"Antigravity" Method 3a of 15, Vacuum Polarization- (Biefeld Brown effect), Group IB(ii)

[aomimezura11]

the description seems to describe an ion engine... sweet

[Juefawn]

5:00 is that perpetual motion? What are the resistances, if any?

[mmeraj6]

i want your company and make some generator plzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

he ion engine is very slow to pick up speed, but over the long haul it can deliver 10 times as much thrust per kilogram of fuel as more traditional rockets. So you can be excused for your lack of foresight. He who laughs last, laughs best. LOL

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

NASA is already using a similar concept refer Deep space 1 probe, this pint-sized powerplant has been doing it longer and more efficiently than anything ever launched. An ion thruster is a form of electric propulsion that creates thrust by accelerating ions. So yes, you can increase your speed by 11,000 km/h on just 2.3kW!

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi fungusamogus,

The number of scientists and engineers who confidently stated that heavier-than-air flight was impossible in the run-up to the Wright brothers' flight is too large to count. Even thought they had small rubber band motored propeller toys they showed it worked on a small scale! Lord Kelvin is probably the best-known. In 1895 he stated that 'heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible', only to be proved definitively wrong just eight years later.

[nickharvey7]

This sounds like it would make a good video!!

The candle flame represents EMR in the visible spectrum we can also see the different wavelength of the EMR as different colours of the light if we use a prism. It would be interesting to see what affect the energy has on the wavelength of the light. If Quantum Atom Theory is right it should form symmetry.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Yes Nick, It would make a good video!! From a visual inspection it appears that there is no change in wavelength when the candle is stationary or next to the spinning gyro. I have a spectrophotometer and can confirm this, but requires a bit of setting up. Please define the symmetry you have mentioned that your theory predicts.

Cheers JRI

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Regarding the candle paradox", further Experiments with smoke, have revealed that it appears that the boundary layer effect is at play, the smoke or flame (hot gases) are dragged towards the slower moving turbulence, which is off course is at the vicinity of the angular velocity of the lowest value which is at the centre of the wheel, air moves from high to low pressure hence attracted to the area of lowest air pressure.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Nick,

Referring to the candle paradox post on my Method 3a vid, where I stated that further Experiments with smoke, have revealed that it appears that the boundary layer effect is at play, the smoke or flame (hot gases) are dragged towards the slower moving turbulence, which is of course at the vicinity of the angular velocity of the lowest value which is at the centre of the wheel, air moves from high to low pressure hence attracted to the area of lowest air pressure.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Was with the gyro spinning vertically and with a candle flame vertically beside it.

I will elaborate further, I then placed a barrier between the flame and the spinning gyro and there was no apparent effect of flame moving towards the gyro, the candles point towards the centre of rotation where the density of the air has decreased.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Further experiments with the experiment performed in the traditional way, where candles enclosed in a glass cup are spun on a horizontal rotating platform, the flame of the candles point towards the centre of rotation where the density of the air has decreased, which basically demonstrates Newtons First Law as inertia pulls the heavier air to the outside; the candle flames point inward.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

This only confirms that classical physics can explain the observed effects, as when the cups are removed the flames move in a direction opposite and at right angles away from the direction of spin to the position of the candle as one would expect, as it is moves through the air.

Cheers JRI

[johannesvalks]

test

[nickharvey7]

Have you tried putting a candle flame next to a gyroscope when it is spinning? I have not tried this but it would be nice to know if the centrifugal force affects the flame as in the candle paradox

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Nick,

Yes I have just tried it, this is absolutely brilliant, when the gyro disc is spinning in a vertical position the candle flame is attracted towards the centre, from either side, always towards the centre, when the candle flame is at the periphery of the spinning disc the candle flame blows away, when the gyro is spinning horizontal, a candle flame from below the candle flame is squashed downward between the earths attractive gravitation force and the centripetal force from the gyro???

[johannesvalks]

Hello John - interresting. Just some questions about the candle. Do I understand what you say if I say: When the flame is inside the gyro-disk is moves outward? And when it is outside the gyro-disk in moves inward?

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Joannesvalks,

No the reverse of what you stated, in most cases apart from when the disc is spinning horizontal and the flame is below, the flame is inside the gyro-disc moves inwards, and when the flame is on the periphery or outer edge of the disc in moves outward.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

I then tried a plasma discharge of 14 MHz and a discharge of 500Khz, both do not follow the path of least resistance, the plasma and discharge respectively are attracted towards the centre or the outer edge, even when the plasma discharge is at a shorter distance than the outer edge. Electromagnetic-gravitic fields unified. I will now perform an experiment to see if I can bend light.

Cheers JRI

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

when the candle is above the horizontally spinning gyro the flame is once again attracted towards the centre as the force of gravity and centripetal force from the gyro have the same net vector direction. All this reminds me of Hans Christian Ørsted experiments with magnets and conductors when electric current from a battery was switched on. I will continue this investigation and let you know the results, this is truly brilliant.

Cheers John

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi fungusamogus,

You are correct, it doesnt allow me to fly as Im too big and the model is too small, size and scale does matter.

Thanks for your comment John

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Why use Gravity when Electromagnetism is several orders of magnitude stronger per centimeter squared?

[Beamshipcaptain]

ETHER TECHNOLOGY

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Beamshipcaptain, in your statement ether Technology are you stating that this technology should be called Ether Technology or are you referring to a book by Rho Sigma, that I discovered recently over the net.

Thanks JRI

[Beamshipcaptain]

The Biefeld Brown Effect is Vacuum Polarisation, acording to Subquantum Kinetics (LaViolette, et al).

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Thanks Beamshipcaptain for this clarification. I would also like to add for the benefit of the readers that that Dr. LaViolette Subquantum kinetics, is a novel approach to microphysics that not only accounts for electric, magnetic, gravitational, and nuclear forces in a unified manner, but also resolves many long-standing problems in physics such as the field singularity problem, the wave-particle dualism, and the field source problem, to mention a few.

Kind Regards JRI

[JonDeth]

You just keyed a very important term in regards to this effect and field in general, ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY.

If someone manages to generate true gravity/anti gravity, AMAZING but until then, everything we see publicly is a form of artificial gravity.

Never overlook the genius that was used to invent the chicken stick.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Thanks for your comment JRI

[Beamshipcaptain]

It IS artificial gravity, that is the WHOLE POINT! Energy and matter are EQUIVALENT!

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Beamshipcaptain,

Yes I totally agree. Einstein field equations in Einstein's theory of general relativity describe the fundamental interaction of gravitation as a result of space-time being curved by matter and energy which equate space-time curvature with the energy and momentum within that space-time which is similar to the way that electromagnetic fields are determined using charges and currents via Maxwell's equations.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

The Poynting Vector is the closest thing that describes the direction of electric, magnetic and gravity that is currently accepted by physics theory named after John Henry Poynting (1852-1914). The Poynting Vector "S" is defined as: S=1/uo*ExB

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

The Poynting vector S=1/uo(EXB) in SI derived units are expressed as watts/meter^2 which in SI basic units is kg/s^3. Therefore on one side of the equation you have Electric / Magnetic, and on the other side you have the units of mass.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

This is extremely revealing. I consider The Poynting Vector as a Grand Unification Theory! To further explain the quantum field theoretic derivation of Einstein's Weak Equivalence Principle of general relativity is based on inertia which can be called quantum inertia.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Poynting suggests that gravity also involves the same 'inertial' electrical force component that exists in inertial mass. Einstein's general relativistic Weak Equivalence Principle originates from common 'lower level' quantum vacuum processes occurring in both gravitational mass and inertial mass in accordance with the principles of quantum field theory.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

To adduce reasons in support, it does appear that all matter and the quantum fields of the strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions of our entire material universe are confined to a 3D membrane that floats around in a higher dimensional space where they roam wild. The apparent weakness of gravity would therefore be an illusion to inhabitants of the membrane: gravity is merely diluted as it spreads out into additional dimensions that we cannot perceive.

Kind Regards

JRI

[Beamshipcaptain]

THat is one new theory, I know, and there are several mathematical theoretical proofs to support that, jsut as there are theoretical and experimental proofs that show gravitation is simply due to a converging flux of ether. Which means that gravitation is the Casimir-effect on a Macro-scale. My two-cents. Namaste.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Beamshipcaptain, This is new to me thanks, an interesting theory, worth some more though. Cheers John

[Beamshipcaptain]

I was going to subscribe to you and I see I am already subbed! Great!

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Beamshipcaptain,

Thanks for your subscription and your fantastic work and enthusiasm to the cause.

Kind Regards JRI

[Beamshipcaptain]

This is my job, my MISSION... Namaste, peace.

[Beamshipcaptain]

Of course it is ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY! Not "anti-gravity". This is all semantics.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Hi Beamshipcaptain,

Yes all semantics, the term ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY is also used in a number of different ways, i.e. centrifugal force as well as a simulation of gravity in outer space or free-fall. The word antigravity also denotes a range of ideas, adopted by various people to meen different concepts. Which is why I have the term antigravity in inverted commas.

Cheers JRI

[GreatSorcerer2]

Hello please check universetechnique, universetechnique2, greatsorcerer,greatsorcerer2, thaijellybean242. Thank you. Enjoy learn something new. View all my favorite. Thank me later. Be a part of what I know.Welcome to my life.You have been selected to view the opening movie trailer of the movie Touch of Fluid. Remember I was here

[JKG317]

What is happening here with the spin of that little canoe shaped item?

I understand it has a preferential spin, and perhaps is subject to a constant torque, as evidenced by its spin once static friction is overcome. But what is the mechanism by with this torque is created? If it's vacuum polarization, what is creating that effect?

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

Your answer depends on from what point of view you want to look at. According to classical physics, each direction of spin is linked to a different mode of oscillation: if clockwise rotation feeds the pitching oscillation, then counter-clockwise spin would feed a side-to-side, or rolling, oscillation. So, when the canoe shaped object spins clockwise, any tiny pitching oscillation will grow exponentially.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

It feeds off the rotational energy which slows down the spin. But even when there is zero spin, the torque still acts, So the direction of spin changes. Now beginning to spin counter-clockwise, the energy stored in the pitching oscillation feeds into the counter-clockwise rotation (and the rolling oscillation). The canoe can reverse spin directions again by trading rotational energy with the rolling oscillation.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

The canoe can reverse spin directions again by trading rotational energy with the rolling oscillation. This spin-reversal motion seems, at first sight, to violate the angular-momentum conservation law of physic.

From a quantum physics point of view we ask how the spin actually causes the oscillation and spin reversal,

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

this video was filmed in 1996 and at the time I believed that it was an example of a Vacuum polarization effect, in quantum field theory and specifically electrodynamics this process describes that the background electromagnetic field produce virtual electron-positron pairs that change the distribution of charges and currents that were generated originally by the electromagnetic field,

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

this energy is called the zero point energy or sometimes referred to as self energy, where matter interacts with charged particles with the vacuum or ether . In the canoe example the force is induced by rotation,

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

which widens the positron sources in the electron-positron dipoles. Such as the Coriolis force which is the right angle deflection that is encountered at a centrifugal pressure barrier. It also prevents a pivoted precessing gyroscope from toppling over, it causes the reversal torque in canoe shown, and it is also involved in the force of electromagnetic induction.