The video also makes the claim comets have "icy surface". Direct observations and sample collection from comets shows quite clearly and convincingly that comets have a rocky surface, as well as a rocky interior. Comets are rocks, not balls of ice sublimating from solar heating.
The video also shows a "belt" of densely populated asteroids between Mars and Jupiter, we know from observation that "near Earth" regions are more densely populated with objects.
Feel free to do your own research to verify the claims. It's enough work for me simply to correct all your errors and the errors of others. No source I could give you would convince you, anyway, since you've rejected every single source of information that I've provided to verify the claims I've made. Do your own research, convince yourself, or remain ignorant. It's your choice, you make it.
@fertilizerspike I've done plenty of research. I spent most of the past few months in the Science Library at my University. Your lame excuse is all the evidence one needs that you don't have any sources, that you are just cribbing your favorite counter-culture icons, and that you wouldn't know where to find a source, much less what is actually in it. Every time you respond to anyone in these threads you every and always do nothing but prove what an empty and obnoxious troll you are.
Apparently you've been researching coloring books or works of fiction because what you call "science" is nothing more than a collection of fables masquerading as science. Eat my ass, you fucking troll, and save your opinions about me for the next time your mother comes down to the basement to do your laundry. Just keep your fat fucking mouth shut about me. This video is not about me and this comments section is not for comments about me.
@fertilizerspike Yeah yeah, someone has you pegged, so you resort to vulgarity and name calling. When you cough up a source, we may have something to talk about, but as it stands you are obviously much more interested in antagonism than anything resembling an intelligent exchange of ideas.
As I've stated to you several times here and elsewhere, I've tried my best to point you in the right direction so you can discover this information for yourself. You refuse to do the leg work. I can't force you to learn. I've given you dozens (if not hundreds by now) of sources, you ignore them. That's your fault. And I address people the way they address me. If they stick to the subject, so do I. If they try to discuss me, I hit them in the face with both barrels.
Again and again we've done this. You ask for information, I give it, you ask for "sources" of the information, I give it, you call it my "opinions" or some such, I tell you to eat my ass, you complain, I call you a lazy whiner. I don't see this going anywhere. I think your learning disabilities are going to make it impossible for me to teach you anything. Couple that with your combative and insulting demeanor and it makes quite a nasty and annoying package. Cheerio.
@fertilizerspike Also, (unless you can provide a reasonable source that says otherwise) even if you include the centaurs, Near Earth Objects, Lagrange objects of the Jovian planets and other miscellaneous Small Solar System Bodies, the region between Mars and Jupiter still remains the most densely populated collection of SSSBs, and even though it is early days for the Kuiper Belt, the number of observed objects fitting the description of KBOs is easily living up to prediction.
I've already done the research. The flux density of objects in "near Earth" regions of the solar system is an order of magnitude larger than in the "asteroid belt". This isn't surprising, since the "asteroid belt" is vastly huge compared to "near Earth" regions. Again, we're talking about density of objects, not the sheer number of objects. The "near Earth" region of the solar system is much more densely populated, and this is OBSERVED, not assumed.
On a related note, the "asteroid belt" was hypothesized due to an inherently flawed numerological model of planetary spacing that ignored the "outer planets". This model was subsequently abandoned, but its prediction of a planet between Mars and Jupiter persisted. When no planet was found, but instead asteroids, it was dubbed the "asteroid belt", without any consideration of the actual density of objects or comparisons to other regions of the solar system.
The claim is made in this video that comets formed in "cold" parts of the solar system while asteroids formed in "warm" parts of the solar system. There is no basis to make this claim, in fact, samples from comets indicate they formed under very "hot" conditions. Astronogers continue to cling to this icy comet model that says they are all watery "remnants" of the solar system formation. Again, there is no basis for this claim.
Peak dates this year- the mornings of Aug. 12 and 13- 11 may not be bad either. So from midnight to dawn of these dates find a dark, grassy place to lay back and watch the show.
@Kenjineering In case anyone's wondering, this is just gibberish, it's spam. abcderqwtyz posted a i u e o, the five vowels in Japanese, and Kenjineering posted ka ki ku ke ko, the next five characters in the Japanese alphabet.
@SuperiorApostate yeah i havent seen fertilizerspike around for ages... maybe hes in hiding from government agents or men in black. Or been electrocuted doing electric gravity research...
Maybe you can suck my fat cock, faggot. I don't know why you fucking idiots are so obsessed with me, you fill these comment sections of these videos with superfluous imaginary bullshit you invent about me, and very rarely add anything salient to the discussion that isn't readily refuted.
@SuperiorApostate Yeah, I was wondering how long it would take our resident crazies to come out and tell us all about how meteors are a purely EM phenomena.
I was wondering how long it would take our resident crazies to come out and tell us all about how there is no electricity in space, and everything is explained by "gravity".
@fertilizerspike Funny, I've never said anything about there being NO EM phenomena in space, nor that gravity is the sole explanation for observed phenomena... You however have made MANY claims, not one of which you have properly sourced or cited. Your spurious attack has no basis... somewhat like your wild, and as yet unsupported rantings about astronomy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
why do the narrators feel the need to tell us who they are and where they are from? Do they think anyone (but them of course) gives an honest to God (sorry science) fuck?
@zx1011 So you can look them up. If you just want to swallow everything you hear on TV or YouTube wholesale, I guess it doesn't matter. However, some of us like to check sources any time something sounds fishy or new.
Additionally, the point of these, rather elementary videos, is to get people interested in science and let them know that the scientific organizations and institutions they pay for are doing something they can appreciate directly.
Salamat para sa video
pa rin nagtatrabaho sa kanyang pabor
NewKeepSharing31 1 week ago
@BLmarlo lol... Me too
ftopdirs 1 month ago
just lovely
TheSanovita 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nice vid
TheSanovita 2 months ago
wau. sangat mengagumkan video anda ini
ctopdirs 2 months ago
Thx For Sob, Nice Video
TheJatmikoo 2 months ago
@TheJatmikoo saya juga
JeniTheBat 2 months ago
meteor showers are so beautiful
xtremetom180 2 months ago
amazing!
MyDavidsun 2 months ago
Very nice video
andreeaweed 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
weee ... love it .. the universe if full of unbelievable things ..:)
gadionson1 2 months ago
. . . . : that starsign, what is it?
officialWB 1 year ago
wow space is really weird its unbelievable
scfcsmithy 1 year ago
@scfcsmithy ....space is lame
darpachief 1 year ago
i like tacos
FuckJeffG0ldblum 1 year ago
Good video, I hope a rare meteorite lands safely where i can find it!
777dingo 1 year ago
The video also makes the claim comets have "icy surface". Direct observations and sample collection from comets shows quite clearly and convincingly that comets have a rocky surface, as well as a rocky interior. Comets are rocks, not balls of ice sublimating from solar heating.
The video also shows a "belt" of densely populated asteroids between Mars and Jupiter, we know from observation that "near Earth" regions are more densely populated with objects.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike "Direct observations and sample collection from comets shows..."
Source?
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutodidacticPhd
Feel free to do your own research to verify the claims. It's enough work for me simply to correct all your errors and the errors of others. No source I could give you would convince you, anyway, since you've rejected every single source of information that I've provided to verify the claims I've made. Do your own research, convince yourself, or remain ignorant. It's your choice, you make it.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike I've done plenty of research. I spent most of the past few months in the Science Library at my University. Your lame excuse is all the evidence one needs that you don't have any sources, that you are just cribbing your favorite counter-culture icons, and that you wouldn't know where to find a source, much less what is actually in it. Every time you respond to anyone in these threads you every and always do nothing but prove what an empty and obnoxious troll you are.
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutodidacticPhd
Apparently you've been researching coloring books or works of fiction because what you call "science" is nothing more than a collection of fables masquerading as science. Eat my ass, you fucking troll, and save your opinions about me for the next time your mother comes down to the basement to do your laundry. Just keep your fat fucking mouth shut about me. This video is not about me and this comments section is not for comments about me.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike Yeah yeah, someone has you pegged, so you resort to vulgarity and name calling. When you cough up a source, we may have something to talk about, but as it stands you are obviously much more interested in antagonism than anything resembling an intelligent exchange of ideas.
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutodidacticPhd
As I've stated to you several times here and elsewhere, I've tried my best to point you in the right direction so you can discover this information for yourself. You refuse to do the leg work. I can't force you to learn. I've given you dozens (if not hundreds by now) of sources, you ignore them. That's your fault. And I address people the way they address me. If they stick to the subject, so do I. If they try to discuss me, I hit them in the face with both barrels.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutodidacticPhd
Again and again we've done this. You ask for information, I give it, you ask for "sources" of the information, I give it, you call it my "opinions" or some such, I tell you to eat my ass, you complain, I call you a lazy whiner. I don't see this going anywhere. I think your learning disabilities are going to make it impossible for me to teach you anything. Couple that with your combative and insulting demeanor and it makes quite a nasty and annoying package. Cheerio.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike Also, (unless you can provide a reasonable source that says otherwise) even if you include the centaurs, Near Earth Objects, Lagrange objects of the Jovian planets and other miscellaneous Small Solar System Bodies, the region between Mars and Jupiter still remains the most densely populated collection of SSSBs, and even though it is early days for the Kuiper Belt, the number of observed objects fitting the description of KBOs is easily living up to prediction.
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutodidacticPhd
I've already done the research. The flux density of objects in "near Earth" regions of the solar system is an order of magnitude larger than in the "asteroid belt". This isn't surprising, since the "asteroid belt" is vastly huge compared to "near Earth" regions. Again, we're talking about density of objects, not the sheer number of objects. The "near Earth" region of the solar system is much more densely populated, and this is OBSERVED, not assumed.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutodidacticPhd
On a related note, the "asteroid belt" was hypothesized due to an inherently flawed numerological model of planetary spacing that ignored the "outer planets". This model was subsequently abandoned, but its prediction of a planet between Mars and Jupiter persisted. When no planet was found, but instead asteroids, it was dubbed the "asteroid belt", without any consideration of the actual density of objects or comparisons to other regions of the solar system.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
The claim is made in this video that comets formed in "cold" parts of the solar system while asteroids formed in "warm" parts of the solar system. There is no basis to make this claim, in fact, samples from comets indicate they formed under very "hot" conditions. Astronogers continue to cling to this icy comet model that says they are all watery "remnants" of the solar system formation. Again, there is no basis for this claim.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
Peak dates this year- the mornings of Aug. 12 and 13- 11 may not be bad either. So from midnight to dawn of these dates find a dark, grassy place to lay back and watch the show.
julsHz 1 year ago
Thank you, NASA!
MrAndromedean 1 year ago 2
No offense, but this woman sounds like Sarah Palin. lol Kinda strange.
owchywawa 1 year ago
@owchywawa Yeah, especially since that voice belongs to a woman who could not understand the simplest scientific concepts.
TheBeyonder77 1 year ago
@owchywawa kinda, but she doesn't have that indescribably annoying back of the throat talk.
jnthnbush 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
あいうえお
abcderqwtyz 1 year ago
@abcderqwtyz
かきくけこ
Kenjineering 1 year ago
@Kenjineering In case anyone's wondering, this is just gibberish, it's spam. abcderqwtyz posted a i u e o, the five vowels in Japanese, and Kenjineering posted ka ki ku ke ko, the next five characters in the Japanese alphabet.
TharosTheDragon 1 year ago
The universe is full of beauty! Thumbs up & favorite.
MrWajax 1 year ago
@MrWajax nothing more beautiful than the pussy
ABONESR 1 year ago
tnk
731288 1 year ago
where's fertilizerspike with his brilliant ideas why gravity does not exist..?
SuperiorApostate 1 year ago
@SuperiorApostate yeah i havent seen fertilizerspike around for ages... maybe hes in hiding from government agents or men in black. Or been electrocuted doing electric gravity research...
jeebersjumpincryst 1 year ago
@jeebersjumpincryst Or trying to figure out who killed John O'Neal... and why.
julsHz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jeebersjumpincryst
Maybe you can suck my fat cock, faggot. I don't know why you fucking idiots are so obsessed with me, you fill these comment sections of these videos with superfluous imaginary bullshit you invent about me, and very rarely add anything salient to the discussion that isn't readily refuted.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@SuperiorApostate Yeah, I was wondering how long it would take our resident crazies to come out and tell us all about how meteors are a purely EM phenomena.
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
@AutodidacticPhd
I was wondering how long it would take our resident crazies to come out and tell us all about how there is no electricity in space, and everything is explained by "gravity".
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike Funny, I've never said anything about there being NO EM phenomena in space, nor that gravity is the sole explanation for observed phenomena... You however have made MANY claims, not one of which you have properly sourced or cited. Your spurious attack has no basis... somewhat like your wild, and as yet unsupported rantings about astronomy.
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why do the narrators feel the need to tell us who they are and where they are from? Do they think anyone (but them of course) gives an honest to God (sorry science) fuck?
zx1011 1 year ago
@zx1011 same goes for anyone on TV, like news reporters
robertwc82 1 year ago
@zx1011 Relax, it is a formality.
kubush 1 year ago
@zx1011 So you'd rather they not say? Then how would you know if they're legit or not?
UltraComboer 1 year ago
@zx1011 So you can look them up. If you just want to swallow everything you hear on TV or YouTube wholesale, I guess it doesn't matter. However, some of us like to check sources any time something sounds fishy or new.
Additionally, the point of these, rather elementary videos, is to get people interested in science and let them know that the scientific organizations and institutions they pay for are doing something they can appreciate directly.
AutodidacticPhd 1 year ago
Beautiful universe...
WICKEDMAN9MM 1 year ago
I wonder what a meteor shower sounds like...
Kargoneth 1 year ago
@Kargoneth , zooooooooooooooom.... zooooooooooooooooooooooom.... zooooooooooooooooooooooooooomm.. lol
gskowal 1 year ago
@Kargoneth That's a very interesting question dude. Probably it sounds like missiles hitting the earth.
TheBeyonder77 1 year ago
Good video!
CanadianoftheCoast 1 year ago
Very nice Vid ;)
Thumbs up
victoirclochard 1 year ago
Thank you N.A.S.A. Can wait to know a little bit more of our fantastic Universe. Un millon de gracias. LOVE N.A:S.A
hilargiak 1 year ago
@Hikk0 cool story bro. Now back to the awesomeness of America
Zoroasterrrr 1 year ago