@cronoslogic if we take electromagnetism as base 1 strength, then strong nuclear force would be approx 100, weak nuclear force about 0.0000000001 and gravity 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 or 10 to minus 14.
However, it is a few years since I studied cosmology at university, so the figures could be different now
@cronoslogic Gravity might be one of the most dominate forces because it binds planetary systems, galaxies, and even the universe, but gravity is in theory losing to dark energy. And in terms of the strength of forces gravity is the weakest of the 4 fundamental forces in quantum mechanics. Weak forces, electromagnetic forces, and strong forces all have a relative strength of 10 to the power of 25 to 38. Gravity has a relative strength of 1. A child can beat gravity, if only for a second.
Its hard to think that supposedly noting is stronger than a black hole gravitation, but there was a big bang (a lot more matter than a black hole). Even the theory of time travel auto contradict it self. There is what we can call "Relative Time and General Time". Time is not more than matter movement (Frames). I mean, of course the clock use in Einstein's experiment will go slower on higher speed, after all speed act like gravity and the atoms of that clock will be affected.
@AeonLeon the problem with most of these theories and the reason why they seem to contradict themselves at times, is because they cannot be proven. Until you can go examine and test a black hole, or observe how time is affected when massive gravity is introduced, the bottom line is, it's all just a bunch of speculation and conjecture. Nothing to be overly concerned with now, since with the numerous genocidal maniacs running loose on this planet, we'll probably never get the hard evidence.
Thanks to the series, I am more appreciative of having a pair of eyes. The images are absolutely gravitating and I'm am grateful to be able to see cool cosmic entities. Your the man cronologic.
presenter stands there with his hands in his pockets talking in a monotonous tone . . . note the difference between sub-standard communicators of science and and more enthusiastic advocates such as Carl Sagan or Prof. Brian Cox
I was brought up with the understanding that we each have our own opinions! but to bash that which we don't or can't comprehend leads me to my next statement. It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt! If there is no God but you believe there is and you have that faith, your life will be easier because you have God to help you through it. If you don't have faith and there is a God? Better get out your heavy duty water wings to swim in Hell??
Guys i have serious doubts on this documentary and the clips, You can imagine from that, there are two types of histories (underground, public) that do exists in our World Earth, the only public history is allowed to be published but they hide the underground history which is really the actual events that took place. it doesnt hide nothing.
Based on this habit, how come NASA is providing us ACTUAL info on SPACE :))))))))))))) lot of Computer Aid is being used to fool youth!!!!!
@changbroot the pictures are taken through a series of procesess. x-ray , U.V., and if im not mistaken visible light. true the telescope does need a longer exsposure time to create any visible picture. thank god for technologie being able to rotate the telescope the correct speed to keep the light its collecting directed in the center of the mirrors.
I can't trust those images at all. They just make up those pictures with computers and photoshop. It's impossible to take an accurate image of an outer celestial body, when Hubble itself is rotating around the earth. Now, Hubble itself is moving at around 7.5 km. The speed is high enough to distort any image from the earth, let alone the FAR objects that are light years away. Imagine in 1 sec, it's pointed in totally different direction, or better yet, in opposite direction after several minutes
How does the Hubble Telescope not get sucked into a Black Hole, Burnt by a star, go through a worm hole, run inot a planet, or get hit by a meteor? It seems unreal in so many ways....
Well said KirbSleep, If only most men were like you. I mean i really do dispise religion. It's such a STUPID and childish belief i duno how 80% of the worlds population believe it. I really do not.
couldnt hubble just be in a counter-wise orbit, leaving it on allmost the same spot in space all day long?
like lets say the earth is turning counter clockwise when looked down on it from above the northpole, then you can just have hubble orbit earth clockwise right?
thats true if the lens was pointed the way it travels it would face the earth on the other side. But if you focuss the lens sidewards above the horizon it will never look at earth in orbit.
Science Obliterates religion, and the more we learn leaves less and less room for your "god" to operate... like take lighting for example... religion had u belive it was a god casting bolts down,.. But we soon realized from Science that it was just static from clouds... so i hope we lean REALLY REALLY fast to stop religion for mans sake, it only hinders our potential.
this mystery of Why ?no one knows whats going on and common sense tells you can not take things for granted especially on the theme of god.. god is the entity of what created us in peoples minds . what s being discused here is only abouts what is out there. but doesnt answer the question why ? but we have to find out whats out there before we can find out why ? just as space is huge a lot of answers lie in things we cant see.dont ask me why i just dont know
BleuJooz.... shut up... please... cant you get it ? 1 qeustion ...
if god created the earth in 6 days, and all stars and other galaxy's where made in 1 day ?... so god take's 6 days only for earth, and 1 day for everything else there is in space ? kinda strange ....
Originally it was theorized that the gravity of baryonic matter (stuff made of atoms & molecules, like stars & galaxies) would slow down the spacetime expansion, but the discovery of dark matter changed all that. Most of what acts like gravity in the large scale universe is not matter as we know it. No one knows what it is so they call it Dark Matter. It makes up most of the mass of the universe. We see its effects everywhere, but not it. Not yet. Theories abound.
So mass-gravity as we know it didn't exist until several hundred thousand years after the BB, when spacetime finally expanded enough to cool enough to allow solid matter to form from a soup of subatomic particles (quark soup). It condensed to form ~90% hydrogen & 10% helium, from which all subsequent stars and galaxies formed. (yes, you are 80% water by weight, water is H2O, and all the hydrogen in ur body is ~14 billion years old... left over from the BB!)
Does anyone think it makes since that if the hubble telescope took images from billions of light years away, that if a planet that far away also pictures that it would be able to see the beginning of life on Earth?
@drummaboi14 No, it doesn't make sense. Telescopes still rely on light to capture images. Planets on their own are not big enough to emit enough light to be picked up by telescopes.
@drummaboi14 Well in order to see the Earth itself, we would have to be traveling faster than the speed of light in order to beat our light here to see it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There is no such thing as dark matter. This is just an effect created by the fact that gravity is strong on the inside near the beggining. When the universe reaches a point in expansion where the outer gravity at the centre of dematerialising matter all around,,gets stronger than the creating matter closer to the start,,it speeds up. It all rushes back to the infinity of small inside each partical. Infinitly small and infinitly large are the same infinity. It's a cycle where all is inbetween..
I would guess its expanding into the multiverse, or maybe there is an opening in anothr universe that ours is leaking into. These are some pretty awesome things to think about!
i believe there is life "out there" but it's probably really advanced, or single celled organisms, but to have something around us as far as evolution would be incredible...but really, anything would be.
Ug. What Banter doesn't realize is that earth is not a closed system, which is required for the second law of thermodynamics (the law he is referring to, no doubt) to be valid. Plus, this is a video about the Hubble space telescope...not creationism or whatever he is trying to argue.
Also, if things evolve to a higher state, why didn't every animal evolved from a lower state, why didn't those others evolve too, if the higher state is indeed more suitable to survive? And why does every, and I repeat EVERY, physical science have a law that states if left to itself, a force or chemical state or whatever DEVOLVES to a lower state?
Only 1 higher intelligence can exist at a time. And the chances of a species evolving to such intelligence is extremely rare. And also we act as the inhibitors of evolution for other species that could have evolved to our level. If we are to leave earth. Im sure the next caretakers of this planet that could match/surpass our intelligence are dolphins and chimpanzees otherwise.
Well, if for example 2 different hominid species had survived to form the first complex societies (city states), the possibility for one of them to be exterminated in conflicts would be very high. You can look back time and see how the human race have exterminated itself... for reasons such as tribe, religion , politics, color.
Even though thats exactly the reason 2 sentient species could never live at the same time, you have to admit it would be pretty cool. Even though it would never happen.
It would gain our planet 1 extra view in the experience of consciousness. Two civilized races would (in peacetime) gain much wider view in psychological and philosophical field.
Why is it that evolutionists pull this dim and stupid crap everywhere they go? I know I'm probably talking to a wall, but here goes. How did everything evolve by chance to be able to sustain this vast ecosystem? Vegetation gives off oxygen, animals give off CO2, in perfect synch so as to sustain. We get every nutrient we need from this same vegetation and animals.
banter2345 your logic makes no sense, youre right, the universe sure is magnificent, and yes it can seem absurd how everything seems to fall in its place, but claiming that some guy with woodoo up his sleeve "created" everything would hardly make it less spectacular, nor explain anything..
Yeah, your eye operates as a mirror interpreting incoming light in the form of light frequency, which defines color. So, the speed of vision would be how fast your eye receives the incoming light + how fast your brain processes that information. Speed may vary from person to person, but not by much I think.
My guess is that you would see light on the ground since most of the light beams won't be traveling on the exact same vector as the car. If the car wasn't there, only the lights, then the light would land behind the headlights.
Nothing outside your car! As you approach the speed of light, everything not in your inertial frame becomes compressed in length, the light you see from objects outside eventually becomes compressed into a smaller and smaller blue-shifted spot in front of you. If you *could* reach the speed of light you would arrive everywhere instantly (from your point of view) as the Lorentz contraction means that distance in the direction you are travelling becomes zero and no time would pass.
Anything on the line you are travelling, yes, as its size in that direction shrinks to zero! However, if you travelled to, say, Andromeda (which is 2.2M light years away) then turned your car round and headed back to earth at light speed, for you no time would have passed, but the earth would have aged 4.4M years, so things would have changed a bit!
In practise though, only the massless particles, i.e. electro-magnetic (photons) and gravitational (graviton) can travel at light speed.
i think believing in science doesn't mean that not believing in GOD...coz science just want to show us some REAL evidence of living... try to watch this site.. zeitgeistmovie dot com
astronomy is the answer to the universe ...why do people study religion?...Why dont people wake up and realize who we are...the goverment want to keep you dim and stupid....
So we can see deep deep into space, and view amazing galaxies, and star systems... Then why is it that we can't get a damn clear picture of the face on Mars?
Gret channel, thanks for all the videos. Best wishes. Irene.
baycast 2 months ago in playlist More videos from cronoslogic
Look 3 christians dont like the truth LOL
699backstab 8 months ago
gravity is not the king of all forces
vulpecula999 1 year ago
@vulpecula999 If not gravity, then please explain. Seems to be king in this Universe since gravity is what holds it all together.
cronoslogic 1 year ago
@cronoslogic if we take electromagnetism as base 1 strength, then strong nuclear force would be approx 100, weak nuclear force about 0.0000000001 and gravity 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 or 10 to minus 14.
However, it is a few years since I studied cosmology at university, so the figures could be different now
vulpecula999 1 year ago
@cronoslogic GOD lol
showtime15o 11 months ago
@cronoslogic Gravity might be one of the most dominate forces because it binds planetary systems, galaxies, and even the universe, but gravity is in theory losing to dark energy. And in terms of the strength of forces gravity is the weakest of the 4 fundamental forces in quantum mechanics. Weak forces, electromagnetic forces, and strong forces all have a relative strength of 10 to the power of 25 to 38. Gravity has a relative strength of 1. A child can beat gravity, if only for a second.
Sektor14g 5 months ago
@vulpecula999
maybe not in these 4 dimensions... but what about the other 7-19 other dimensions? Sure?
00Billy 3 weeks ago
Its hard to think that supposedly noting is stronger than a black hole gravitation, but there was a big bang (a lot more matter than a black hole). Even the theory of time travel auto contradict it self. There is what we can call "Relative Time and General Time". Time is not more than matter movement (Frames). I mean, of course the clock use in Einstein's experiment will go slower on higher speed, after all speed act like gravity and the atoms of that clock will be affected.
AeonLeon 1 year ago
@AeonLeon the problem with most of these theories and the reason why they seem to contradict themselves at times, is because they cannot be proven. Until you can go examine and test a black hole, or observe how time is affected when massive gravity is introduced, the bottom line is, it's all just a bunch of speculation and conjecture. Nothing to be overly concerned with now, since with the numerous genocidal maniacs running loose on this planet, we'll probably never get the hard evidence.
cronoslogic 1 year ago
Hubble has done so much for already. I'm anxious for the James Webb Space Telescope to be launched. Just imagine how much it could accomplish.
BlueLotusSC 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks to the series, I am more appreciative of having a pair of eyes. The images are absolutely gravitating and I'm am grateful to be able to see cool cosmic entities. Your the man cronologic.
TheJovanist 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheJovanist 1 year ago
presenter stands there with his hands in his pockets talking in a monotonous tone . . . note the difference between sub-standard communicators of science and and more enthusiastic advocates such as Carl Sagan or Prof. Brian Cox
doctorHOUSE 1 year ago
I was brought up with the understanding that we each have our own opinions! but to bash that which we don't or can't comprehend leads me to my next statement. It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt! If there is no God but you believe there is and you have that faith, your life will be easier because you have God to help you through it. If you don't have faith and there is a God? Better get out your heavy duty water wings to swim in Hell??
Judster3 1 year ago
What is required ( School Wise ) to become a space scientist?
lpoverdrive 1 year ago
Guys i have serious doubts on this documentary and the clips, You can imagine from that, there are two types of histories (underground, public) that do exists in our World Earth, the only public history is allowed to be published but they hide the underground history which is really the actual events that took place. it doesnt hide nothing.
Based on this habit, how come NASA is providing us ACTUAL info on SPACE :))))))))))))) lot of Computer Aid is being used to fool youth!!!!!
droppermyth1 1 year ago
@changbroot the pictures are taken through a series of procesess. x-ray , U.V., and if im not mistaken visible light. true the telescope does need a longer exsposure time to create any visible picture. thank god for technologie being able to rotate the telescope the correct speed to keep the light its collecting directed in the center of the mirrors.
missionblank1 1 year ago
I can't trust those images at all. They just make up those pictures with computers and photoshop. It's impossible to take an accurate image of an outer celestial body, when Hubble itself is rotating around the earth. Now, Hubble itself is moving at around 7.5 km. The speed is high enough to distort any image from the earth, let alone the FAR objects that are light years away. Imagine in 1 sec, it's pointed in totally different direction, or better yet, in opposite direction after several minutes
changbroot 1 year ago
its wonderful presentation..related to space sceince
venkat007ind 1 year ago
I believe the universe is continuous, just sayin
Orlando2914 1 year ago
How does the Hubble Telescope not get sucked into a Black Hole, Burnt by a star, go through a worm hole, run inot a planet, or get hit by a meteor? It seems unreal in so many ways....
RockOnAdamLambert 1 year ago
Well said KirbSleep, If only most men were like you. I mean i really do dispise religion. It's such a STUPID and childish belief i duno how 80% of the worlds population believe it. I really do not.
swordfish356 1 year ago
Thx for uploading this - this is fascinating!
*****
Corrupt5358 2 years ago 3
couldnt hubble just be in a counter-wise orbit, leaving it on allmost the same spot in space all day long?
like lets say the earth is turning counter clockwise when looked down on it from above the northpole, then you can just have hubble orbit earth clockwise right?
no idea if these physics are possible but haha.
TehKazangsta 2 years ago
@wherejusthumanbeing
thats true if the lens was pointed the way it travels it would face the earth on the other side. But if you focuss the lens sidewards above the horizon it will never look at earth in orbit.
Armigo91 2 years ago
isn't the hubble rotating around the Earth?
then how can it stays focus on one point of space for 10 days????
wearejusthumanbeing 2 years ago
couse it goes around like to each pole so it doesnt get at the back of the earth... i think.
goskoo04 2 years ago
Its stay focus by moving the opposite this spin (earth)
SrryIThoughtUWasCorn 2 years ago
Science Obliterates religion, and the more we learn leaves less and less room for your "god" to operate... like take lighting for example... religion had u belive it was a god casting bolts down,.. But we soon realized from Science that it was just static from clouds... so i hope we lean REALLY REALLY fast to stop religion for mans sake, it only hinders our potential.
KirbSleep 2 years ago
Funny, you'd think God would have had to create himself first...
satinpurplefender 2 years ago
this mystery of Why ?no one knows whats going on and common sense tells you can not take things for granted especially on the theme of god.. god is the entity of what created us in peoples minds . what s being discused here is only abouts what is out there. but doesnt answer the question why ? but we have to find out whats out there before we can find out why ? just as space is huge a lot of answers lie in things we cant see.dont ask me why i just dont know
peterpetersnbg 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
BleuJooZ 2 years ago
That I did
netsoj 2 years ago
BleuJooZ: I do not like green eggs and ham........
Thulgore 2 years ago
BleuJooz.... shut up... please... cant you get it ? 1 qeustion ...
if god created the earth in 6 days, and all stars and other galaxy's where made in 1 day ?... so god take's 6 days only for earth, and 1 day for everything else there is in space ? kinda strange ....
XazorozaX 2 years ago
Fuck ur god .
LaOm33 2 years ago
Originally it was theorized that the gravity of baryonic matter (stuff made of atoms & molecules, like stars & galaxies) would slow down the spacetime expansion, but the discovery of dark matter changed all that. Most of what acts like gravity in the large scale universe is not matter as we know it. No one knows what it is so they call it Dark Matter. It makes up most of the mass of the universe. We see its effects everywhere, but not it. Not yet. Theories abound.
longlakeshore 2 years ago 2
So mass-gravity as we know it didn't exist until several hundred thousand years after the BB, when spacetime finally expanded enough to cool enough to allow solid matter to form from a soup of subatomic particles (quark soup). It condensed to form ~90% hydrogen & 10% helium, from which all subsequent stars and galaxies formed. (yes, you are 80% water by weight, water is H2O, and all the hydrogen in ur body is ~14 billion years old... left over from the BB!)
longlakeshore 2 years ago 2
Does anyone think it makes since that if the hubble telescope took images from billions of light years away, that if a planet that far away also pictures that it would be able to see the beginning of life on Earth?
drummaboi14 2 years ago 9
As we see the light of stars and galaxies in their past, those on the opposite side of the spectrum would see the beginning of Earth.
sososean 2 years ago
that possibility, i must say, is surely above zero percent.. but only provided that control center knows where to focus..
bkthambugala 2 years ago
@drummaboi14 what
RockOnAdamLambert 1 year ago
@drummaboi14 No, it doesn't make sense. Telescopes still rely on light to capture images. Planets on their own are not big enough to emit enough light to be picked up by telescopes.
iz2sicc 4 months ago in playlist Astronomy / Cosmology
@drummaboi14 Well in order to see the Earth itself, we would have to be traveling faster than the speed of light in order to beat our light here to see it.
MrCanadiankid25 3 months ago
Its just mind boggling how far Hubble can see :O
Wonder how much further the new telescope will see.. The future is exciting..
AGWDanimations 2 years ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
Hear no Evil See no Evil Feel no Evil.....
The truth will set you free.... =D
PaulWayneBarnett 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hear no Evil See no Evil Feel no Evil.....
The truth will set you free.... =D
PaulWayneBarnett 2 years ago
Nice techno trance music in the second half, wonder.
cool70200 3 years ago
at 5:12 it looked like a city from sky
videogamenerds2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There is no such thing as dark matter. This is just an effect created by the fact that gravity is strong on the inside near the beggining. When the universe reaches a point in expansion where the outer gravity at the centre of dematerialising matter all around,,gets stronger than the creating matter closer to the start,,it speeds up. It all rushes back to the infinity of small inside each partical. Infinitly small and infinitly large are the same infinity. It's a cycle where all is inbetween..
Rob187ok 3 years ago
Where does light, gravity, waves/wavelengths, and time themselves come from?
If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding in?
cool70200 3 years ago 4
exactly.
somebody give this man a beer.
deathn8r 2 years ago
I would guess its expanding into the multiverse, or maybe there is an opening in anothr universe that ours is leaking into. These are some pretty awesome things to think about!
raptureboi 2 years ago
Comment removed
nickv999 2 years ago
i believe there is life "out there" but it's probably really advanced, or single celled organisms, but to have something around us as far as evolution would be incredible...but really, anything would be.
unforgivenheadshot 3 years ago
so beautiful.
theman696996 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is a exclusive world premiere preview of what is to be released at xmas, to show the world what is above our earth if we just take a look.
a live event will be on the internet xmas week to show these craft live.
this is just a fraction of film there is still 80% more to see.
michiokaku 4 years ago
Ug. What Banter doesn't realize is that earth is not a closed system, which is required for the second law of thermodynamics (the law he is referring to, no doubt) to be valid. Plus, this is a video about the Hubble space telescope...not creationism or whatever he is trying to argue.
jbl5764801 4 years ago
This series went off topic after the 2nd chapter.
thepostfk 4 years ago
looks very cool
l3g3ndin 4 years ago 2
Also, if things evolve to a higher state, why didn't every animal evolved from a lower state, why didn't those others evolve too, if the higher state is indeed more suitable to survive? And why does every, and I repeat EVERY, physical science have a law that states if left to itself, a force or chemical state or whatever DEVOLVES to a lower state?
banter2345 4 years ago 2
Only 1 higher intelligence can exist at a time. And the chances of a species evolving to such intelligence is extremely rare. And also we act as the inhibitors of evolution for other species that could have evolved to our level. If we are to leave earth. Im sure the next caretakers of this planet that could match/surpass our intelligence are dolphins and chimpanzees otherwise.
reichfuhrer1942 3 years ago
Even thought that's true how awesome would it be to have another sentient species living amongst us.
FASpitfire 3 years ago
Well, if for example 2 different hominid species had survived to form the first complex societies (city states), the possibility for one of them to be exterminated in conflicts would be very high. You can look back time and see how the human race have exterminated itself... for reasons such as tribe, religion , politics, color.
SawonEsco 3 years ago 2
Even though thats exactly the reason 2 sentient species could never live at the same time, you have to admit it would be pretty cool. Even though it would never happen.
FASpitfire 3 years ago
I agree.
It would gain our planet 1 extra view in the experience of consciousness. Two civilized races would (in peacetime) gain much wider view in psychological and philosophical field.
SawonEsco 3 years ago
Why is it that evolutionists pull this dim and stupid crap everywhere they go? I know I'm probably talking to a wall, but here goes. How did everything evolve by chance to be able to sustain this vast ecosystem? Vegetation gives off oxygen, animals give off CO2, in perfect synch so as to sustain. We get every nutrient we need from this same vegetation and animals.
banter2345 4 years ago
banter2345 your logic makes no sense, youre right, the universe sure is magnificent, and yes it can seem absurd how everything seems to fall in its place, but claiming that some guy with woodoo up his sleeve "created" everything would hardly make it less spectacular, nor explain anything..
AWorldLedByIgnorance 4 years ago 2
someone message me about if there is a speed of vision
I'm guessing there must be!
shifturhip 4 years ago
Yeah, your eye operates as a mirror interpreting incoming light in the form of light frequency, which defines color. So, the speed of vision would be how fast your eye receives the incoming light + how fast your brain processes that information. Speed may vary from person to person, but not by much I think.
cronoslogic 4 years ago 2
What I want to know is this.... If you are travelling in a car at night at the speed of light and you turn on your headlights......
kearz77 4 years ago 6
you will see no light on the ground lol:}
aflacduky 4 years ago
Ecxactly ..you will be travling with the light
supbeotch 4 years ago
My guess is that you would see light on the ground since most of the light beams won't be traveling on the exact same vector as the car. If the car wasn't there, only the lights, then the light would land behind the headlights.
10kensea79 4 years ago
Nothing outside your car! As you approach the speed of light, everything not in your inertial frame becomes compressed in length, the light you see from objects outside eventually becomes compressed into a smaller and smaller blue-shifted spot in front of you. If you *could* reach the speed of light you would arrive everywhere instantly (from your point of view) as the Lorentz contraction means that distance in the direction you are travelling becomes zero and no time would pass.
Weird huh?
MuckyMcPuppy 3 years ago
Let me get this straight....If I reached the speed of light, I would reach everywhere instantly??? Does that mean all light leads to Rome?
kearz77 3 years ago
Anything on the line you are travelling, yes, as its size in that direction shrinks to zero! However, if you travelled to, say, Andromeda (which is 2.2M light years away) then turned your car round and headed back to earth at light speed, for you no time would have passed, but the earth would have aged 4.4M years, so things would have changed a bit!
In practise though, only the massless particles, i.e. electro-magnetic (photons) and gravitational (graviton) can travel at light speed.
MuckyMcPuppy 3 years ago 3
You'd get a gamma boom similar to a sonic boom. I'd be interested to see how big the boom would be as long as I'm not in the rocket. :)
russkeller 3 years ago
speed of light = speed of vision?
shifturhip 4 years ago
i think believing in science doesn't mean that not believing in GOD...coz science just want to show us some REAL evidence of living... try to watch this site.. zeitgeistmovie dot com
crazymunch 4 years ago
astronomy is the answer to the universe ...why do people study religion?...Why dont people wake up and realize who we are...the goverment want to keep you dim and stupid....
johnrobertsskate 4 years ago
So we can see deep deep into space, and view amazing galaxies, and star systems... Then why is it that we can't get a damn clear picture of the face on Mars?
EvilDOOER 4 years ago
q:IF HUBBLE CHAPTER 9 IS IN TWO PARTS,WHY NOT PLACE CHAPTER 4 IN LIKEWISE?THESE ARE GREAT VIDEOS AND 4 IS SIMPLY MISSING.
MORBIN5150 4 years ago
ok, its so great whats out there.you never know what technology will find out the explore more areas and more planets..
eddienator 5 years ago
If you have a real interest in the Hubble Space Telescope, I suggest watching these videos in sequence.
cronoslogic 5 years ago