Added: 3 years ago
From: FlexYourRights
Views: 83,891
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (201)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No I do NOT consent to a search when I board an airplane. There must be a reasonable suspicion for me to be searched. 4th amendment. This video is bullshit.

  • @darkon123 then you are running the risk of being Detained and held under laws which try to prevent terrorism. you will most likely miss your flight too. Just let them search, it takes only 5 minutes whats the big deal? Everyone gets the same treatment

  • consent or otherwise, you'll be raped

  • "Protected from unreasonable searches & seizures" My ass. TSA searches are highly unreasonable, I have seen them pull a disabled man out of his wheelchair, his legs were shrunken as they've never been used. He had nothing of harm or illegality on him. Disgusting.

  • None

    

  • Going through a full body scanner where you lift your arms violates your 4th Privacy Amendment , and you can deny consent to this and go through a normal security gate instead.

    Thumbs up so people can see this.

  • @SimeonAirsoft Uh... maybe if airlines were owned by the government, but since they are private business's, they can do w/e they want when you ride their planes... if you don't want to get scanned, don't fly, use a car or something.

  • You people need to stop bitching unless you actually want your plane hijacked.

  • VIOLATION FOURTH AMENDMENT!

  • All the searching that goes on at the airports don't make us safe!!!!!

  • Badpanda... The only problem with your drunk driving scenario is that drink driving is not protected by the constitution...the right of not being searched without probable cause IS protected.

  • The only problem with your drinking and driving scenario is that drunk driving is not protected by the constitution...the right to not be searched without probable cause is.

  • Comment removed

  • Does that include state lines or just international borders?

  • Ben Franklin said that "he who would trade liberty for safety deserved neither liberty or safety". If you give away what the founders gave you because you're afraid of the boogie man, you'll have to eat the fruit of it.

  • @mrathke78 ""he who would trade liberty for safety deserved neither liberty or safety".

    That is easy to say in theory but in reailty it dosen't work that way --

    For instance why don't people have the freedom to drink and drive etc -- because its for everyones safety.

  • Hey guys, do you realize that the reason the do not need probable cause, because you have the choice to fly. If you don't step into an airport and try get get on a flight, you will not be searched. It has nothing to do with trying to take anybody's "freedom". While maybe they may be taking away from your "freedom", it's for your own, and everyone else's safety. It's stupid to think that people never try to bring weapons or bombs onto a plane.

  • @hornywigger I don't understand why people think that anything that the government imposes on them is bad. I think if you had a friend or a relative who died on 9/11, you maybe would understand why this is done. It's idiots like you who are destroying this country, not the government.

  • seeing :38 on how long the video i expected it to just say YOU HAVE NONE

  • How dare they make it safe for people to fly!

    You people are ignorant with the "I Dont want my privacy invaded"

    it's like, yeah i understand, but i dont want someone with a fucking bomb, gun or knife on my plane either. Shutup and just go through the damn checkpoint.

    If you got nothing on you, you shouldn't be worried.

  • Because of TSA tyranny, I don't fly anymore, therefore I do not consent to sexual groping by sleazy TSA enforcement thugs.

  • rights in a airport lol what rights

  • If this is so why can the mexicans get through so easy.....

  • @TheAmericanDiablo because white people are the devil

  • @bmxmisfits That doesn't answer my question even if it applies to some white people.

  • Nowhere in the Bill Rights does it say the TSA is exempt.

  • @indyfan22k you basicly sign away you're rights when you buy a plane ticket.

  • @indyfan22k No one is saying they are exempt. They are simply saying if you want the luxury of high speed travel in highly sensitive and dangerous vehicles then the deal is you consent to search.

    Otherwise: take the bus.

  • @BelgianBasterd

    you are uneducated with your statement, This only gives a false sense of security, if a "terrorist" wanted to attack something then they would figure a way out, there are numerous jobs that allow a person to bypass the security checkpoints, the TSA scanners and searches have already allowed many guns through their checkpoints, they are not as safe as you believe, thus a False sense of security

  • @OpenYourEyesAmerica1

    "there are numerous jobs that allow a person to bypass the security checkpoints,"

    Lol so true -- its probably not a coincidence that many indains and paki's work security -- ( and often in airports)

  • That video was completely useless. Drug abusers on the street have more rights than a family traveling to see Grandma.

  • You consent by walking to the security checkpoint? so wheres my alternate route if i dont consent? i dont call it consenting if i have to do it

  • @iwazhere1234567890 You drive you idiot

  • @iwazhere1234567890 I guess you have the right to stay where you are. Come on pal, it`s for the security of people at large. It appears neither you nor I have the right to cross borders without implicit consent to being searched. If you don`t like it, become a Diplomat of your Foreign Office.

  • @iwazhere1234567890 Entry to Private Property, e.g. an airport, is automatic consent to search. But you won't have to worry if you don't have anything illegal or contraband on you.

  • @ReesesChannel said: "Entry to Private Property, e.g. an airport, is automatic consent to search."

    Where did you get this idea?

  • @Pafoofnik1 It was stated in another one of these "Flex Your Rights" videos.

  • @ReesesChannel: OK. I'm sure it's not stated exactly like that. \

    For example, using your airport analogy: I do not give up my right to consent just to enter an airport. I do however, realize that I may not be allowed into certain parts of the airport if I refuse to be searched.

    Not all private property, not give up a right, but informed that I may be restricted if I don't consent to a search.

  • @Pafoofnik1 "Entry to Private Property, e.g. an airport, is automatic consent to search."

    Because that is what the video said -- its like a nightclub or a concert-- its a condition of entry. that you may be searched. for contraband.

  • @badpanda84: I didn't say that, ReesesChannel did.

    I responded that I do not give up my right to consent just to enter an airport. I do however, realize that I may not be allowed into certain parts of the airport if I refuse to be searched.

    Not all private property, not give up a right, but informed that I may be restricted if I don't consent to a search.

  • @iwazhere1234567890 you don't have to get on the plane or cross the boarder. Its your choice.

  • DON'T TOUCH MY JUNK!!!!!!!!!! XD

  • You are lawyer that's been brain washed by the ABA!!!! Anyone can say NO to being searched. There has to be a violation of someone's RIGHTS, or believe that the individual is in the process of a crime before they can search anyone!!!!!! They have to have someone to sign a statement saying they have seen you commit a crime before thay can get a warrant to search you! Then they can only search for a specific item. They can't have a warrant to have a random search. Read the constitution idiot!!!!

  • @jimsanders1 "Anyone can say NO to being searched. There has to be a violation of someone's RIGHTS"

    Exactly and that is fine -- but the consquences of refusing to to be serached is that you will no be allow to enter the restricted area.

  • The US people have no freedom. The "Statue of Liberty" is standing there for what reason?

  • @hlmills2000 to hide the sniveliing asshats which are our leaders!

  • @hlmills2000 that statue has nothing to do with that lol it was a gift from France not even intended for USA

  • @hlmills2000 To make drooling morons feel a disgusting sense of national pride.

  • @hlmills2000 Freedom is only an illusion

  • @hlmills2000 to give you the illusion you have freedom, and because the French gave it to us

  • @hlmills2000 Hyperbolic nonsense.

  • @hlmills2000 i know your feelings bro, but know that your country is just trying to protect its citizens including you.

  • @tetsuky AMERICA IS A CORPORATION,NOT A COUNTRY,BTW IT WAS LIBERATED INTO A REPUBLIC NOT A DEMOCRACY

  • @iwanttocrashmybike wtv =.= your anger just proves that america is messed up XP oh well

  • @tetsuky Anger?You mean my caps button sticking?

  • @iwanttocrashmybike my point is that america's not doing so well right now

  • @tetsuky Indeed,as its being called America,instead of the Union or U.S.

    Now its a Corporation...Even though the non Criminal aspect of our Judicial System is just a game,Real Living people do get hurt by it,course theres two to Tango...

    This series explains it better:

    Political Truth:#1 of 4

    /watch?v=dHdoEP6gtxo

  • @hlmills2000 TO REMIND US THAT MASONS NOW OWN THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION

  • @hlmills2000 no place to sit

  • @hlmills2000 Freedom can mean a wide variety of things. Many countries restrict what the press can publish, your exit from the country, your right to bear arms, your right to deny police entry into your home without probable cause, and more.

  • @hlmills2000 Because Americans love free shit. Its only a matter of time when we're going to sell it to China to melt it down then buy it back.

  • @hlmills2000 No freedom. Lol. Go to other countries then figure out what "freedom" means.

  • @hlmills2000 They have plenty of freedom. But it's more about capitalistic freedom, and about voicing opinions, not just police stuff.

  • @hlmills2000 True freedom doesn't exist anymore. Freedom of speech isn't even present in the UK: If you voice racism you can get arrested. I'm not racist but I think people should be able to voice their opinions however radical they are

  • @hlmills2000

    us freedom is better then the shithole your from i guess!

  • @BrianBuckShot Hey, you got nervous on this, why ? Maybe beecause you're not sure of what you claim ? Oh, BTW, please learn a little english...."is better THAN the...." To get a good education is part of a people's freedom....

  • @hlmills2000 As a Brit, I have to say that is MONUMENTALLY IGNORANT thing to say. Almost all these freedoms this video covers do not apply at all in the United Kingdom nor any of her territories.

    US has far more freedoms. Police don't even need a warrant to raid my home without my consent in the UK. We now have 42-day detention before we need to be charged.

    America wanted Independence from Britain FOR A REASON!

  • @hlmills2000 So the Statue of Happiness can exist in GTA IV

  • Search does not include private information!

  • AKA NAZI STATE

  • @GnLReviews That is only correct when the machines are calibrated and operated correctly, there is very little room for error. Do you trust TSA agents with your life? Keep in mind TSA agents spend hours training, are paid very little, and put under pressure. In contrast, Radiologist spend years training, are paid very well, and work in a relaxed environment.

  • isn't there a reasonability clause against invasive searches such as these?

  • The field of battle the feds have choosen for us all is the civilian one. And for us the public to be disarmed now is like sending your troups into battle with whistles to tell the big guns were to aim there artillery. We are not the governments paws , we are the only reason for having any government. We do not need plans for the continuation of government in case of a nuclear holocost. If the fed gets me and my country men nuked then the feds should to. No need for government without us.

  • If that is the case law then we need to change the law behind it. I want to have some means of defence if I am at 35 k feet and a person pops up and intends to do me or anyone else harm or to high jack the whole flight. That is me up there not a government TSA worker. I have the absolute right to bear arms and the proper type of weapons must be issued to us all since the feds have made us all targets when we fly or are in public. Now that we are targets our right to bear arms is most important

  • @fizzywool Wow, finally some people that can see through all this bullshit. Damn right the things that the US gov. has done theoretically on behalf of their citizens has really n truly increased the risk that, others will act against them. Being an american isn't dangerous so much as attaching yourself in any way to the policies of it's government. I have nothing against most of the americans I've met but to follow your countries politics is like a scifi horror sitcom written by Jerry Springer.

  • radiation causes infertility

  • The minute a person consents to a search by the police, they expose themselves to cops who may plant illegal items. When a person doesn’t consent & the police do the search anyway, it is often thrown out of court by the judge no matter what they find. But since the TSA knows that their searches legally circumvent this rule of law, they get away with it thanks to the traitors to the Constitution in the U.S. Congress. TSA agents have been caught planting drugs in people’s stuff at the airports.

  • god i wish they made videos like this for australians.

  • Don't like airline security tactics? Don't fly!

  • NO... WRONG schmuck... the Constitution applies, even in airports. This guy is an obvious give your rights away lib!!!

  • "As with any group of humans, 80% of them are assholes, and 20% are cool. That's 1 in 5. I am educated, responsible and hard working"

    yeah but the reality is that being an asshole works better... how are police meant to enforce the law if they back down everytime people refuse to be searched.. Otherwvise every drug dealer would refuse

  • @badpanda84: Are you saying that police are not required to follow the law? You know what I call a person that acts outside of the law? A criminal.

  • @Pafoofnik1 Well the law is open to interpreation...

  • @badpanda84: Yup. That job is left to the courts. Not the police. And the courts have interpreted that the the right to refuse consent to search is constitutionally valid.

  • @Pafoofnik1 Still sure it would be better to put up with being searched  occasinally if it meant that police could acutally do there job and arrest drug dealers and crimal more effectively

  • @badpanda84: You can get searched, as long as the officers follow the law.

  • @Pafoofnik1 Well yeah if you consent -- but if you were a drug dealer would you consent to a serch??  No criminal is going to consent to a search

  • @badpanda84: You can still be searched even if you do not consent. The particulars depend on where you are. Searching a house is not easy at all. Searching your effects at a TSA security checkpoint or actually U.S. border is much easier.

  • @Pafoofnik1 then what is the point of saying "I dont consent to any searches"  if the police are going to do it anyway

  • @badpanda84: For example, in a house search officers need either consent or a warrant to search. To obtain a warrant, officers must gather up enough evidence to convince a judge that they are very certain that you are engaged in criminal activity and that exact proof of this activity will be found if they search.

    If you consent, then they can go fishing through your entire house looking for anything.

  • @Pafoofnik1 Fair enought but I was think more along the line of cops searching your car (

  • @badpanda84: A car search is almost the same. For the most part, officers need to the same probable cause needed to search a house. The only real difference is that they do not have to present the proof to a judge before they search. They will still have to justify that probable cause existed before the search should the incident make it to court.

    Research _motor vehicle exception_for more info.

  • So if I cross the border then a 40 year old man is allowed to stick his finger up my untouched anus? D:

  • BIND THE TYRANTS BY THEIR OWN WORDS!!!! (I.e. Study their language. Legalese is the language of FORKED TONGUES)

  • Silly silly rabbits. I usually like the stuff they post, but this one kinda thru me for a loop. I guess it's more of me wanting to ask a question. You see, when they said ANY TIME you fly commercially, and or crossing international borders, you are by default Consenting to a Search. Well, that doesn't make any sense. Consent means of free will. So in the event that I choose to Travel, across and then back into this country, the act of traveling doesn't constitute or proclaim in anyway that cons

  • Airline Security = All constitutional rights suspended.

  • @soccom8341576 as i understand it, the airport you step in is not considered "your" country

  • I got three days in jail when I asked a told a cop who pulled me over that he can search my car "...if I can search his...". He jerked me out of the car and when I positioned myself of my shoulder that was hurting (while on the ground) he also charged me with resisting arrest and assault....

  • @BallsInYourJawsBitch You are an idiot.

  • @BallsInYourJawsBitch if by promoting criminality you mean stating your rights then yeah i suppose you are right.

  • How to get into the US:

    1. Babble some foreign language with hints of english

    2. Tell everyone about how offended you are.

  • we are not even bounded by the same laws that limit police.

    our authority is nearly absolute, we're MORE CLOSELY RELATED TO SOLDIERS, than we are to police

    :)

  • @Yankee81186

    You sound like you might really enjoy this ABSOLUTE POWER you think you have.You also sound like the type of person that should not be allowed any where near these types of JOBS performed to protect and SERVE U.S. citizens

  • @Yankee81186 Most of what your saying is retarded.You have no more rights than any U.S. citizen.You dont have a ton of power,why not to long ago,a boarder patrol agent was thrown in jail for 20 years for shooting an illigal who was driving a truck filled with tons of non-concealed pot,and refused to stop.I will agree with you on one point though,if you are in this country illigaly,you are not a citizen,you have norights,and should be deported the second you are caught.Its not racist,its the law.

  • If the X ray machine fucking fried you to death, thats not the fuckin problem of the United States Border Patrol.

  • and we also have the right to use any motherfuckin piece of equipment we deem needed to conduct our job.

    we're not your fuckin doctor, we are the United States Border Patrol.

  • when you cross a border, you have no rights at all.

    You are NOT a citizen of the country you are going into,  unless you are returning.

    and then you have to PROVE that you are a citizen.

    period

  • Just because you cross a border it does not mean that you consent to a search. What they mean is, that you will be forced into being searched and that is a different matter entirely.

    Get to grips with your common law rights, enter into lawful rebellion and take back your common law rights and with it your freedom. Check it out, there are plenty of sites and together we can hold these idiots accountable for what they do: freedomrebels co uk, tpuc org, worldfreemansociety org, fmotl com.

  • Should we consent to x-ray searches that will cause us cancer as well?

  • @ScopedOUT2 one x ray wont cause cancer many x rays shouldnt cause cancer and the only time the law enforcement would make you have an x ray is if you are already under arrest and they have full evidence of the possiablity that something is in your body

  • Well, you're obviously not a medical expert at all. A few x-rays per year will put you in threat of developing cancer. That is why your doctor or dentist must always ask how many you've taken thus far, before attempting to take another x-ray. Moreover, these X-ray machines are very powerful and they're also full body, which means every segment of your body is now in greater risk, unlike localized x-rays.

    Let the big guys convince you why these things are good for security and steal freedom!

  • @ScopedOUT2 I know exactly how x rays work and I am in the medical field

    I am not disagreeing with the fact that x rays can absolutly not cause cancer yes it is true that x rays emit radiation thats why the radiologist stands in a diffrent room and patients are given protection in the gentile reason as to not cause seterlization but to say that one x ray is going to cause cancer is a bold statement

  • @ScopedOUT2 Are you a medical expert? one might assume you would be, considering the way you talk. What was once considered dangerous levels of radiation has been restudied, and it is shown that not only can humans take more radiation than previously thought, the body has the capabilities to repair damage from such exposure in a very short period of time, as short as one day. So it wouldnt matter if you got that x-ray once a year, or 12 times a year.

    Old procedures do not reflect new facts...

  • Go through machine or get your "pee wees" and "boobies" touched for a moment. Looks like the TSA agent did exactly as trained. What is the miscommunication here?

    If you’re worried about government taking control there are plenty of other topics.

    FYI… Not a lot of years back there was a question the Feds had to answer..."How can we MAKE SURE that nothing gets on a plane and blows it up; and as fast as possible"...The scanner does this. How many of you fly anyway? Just my 2 cents.

  • Comment removed

  • @ScopedOUT2 actually, that amount of radiation isnt going to affect you at all, your chances of getting cancer actually rise by 0.00000000375% to every 10,000 units of radiation, which is about 200 X-RAYS a month.

  • @ScopedOUT2 this stops terorrists from killin ppl u dumb asshole

  • @BelgianBasterd well said from a Belgian bastard...

  • @ScopedOUT2 Not only that but also your Dr or Dentist will cover you with a lead plated vest during an x-ray (women anyway) and also will cover your thyroid which is extremely sensitive to radiation. Also, these aren't just ordinary x-ray machines, they are back-scatter scanners which can affect your dna.

  • @ScopedOUT2

    so it will be 5 years when we start to see cancer in a number of Pilots, Flight Attendance, and very flequent flyars ?

  • @indyfan22k Interesting that you happen to mention cancer and the TSA

    healthland.time.com/2011/06/30­/did-airport-scanners-give-bos­ton-tsa-agents-cancer

    Then there is the NIST who said they HAVE NOT validated that the scanners are safe

    epic.org/privacy/backscatter/r­adiation_NIST_USAToday.pdf

  • @ScopedOUT2 damn bro!!! that was deeeeeep!

  • @ScopedOUT2 Well if you dont consent you are just refused entry to the country

  • what about the border patrol checkpoints INSIDE the U.S.?

    Does the same concept apply?

  • Just like with private security at a concert or a sporting event, you have the right to not give consent and are free to walk back the way you came. In order to proceed though, you have to consent to the search.

  • Bullshit, I don't consent to any fucking search at the airport.

  • @goob67896 then you can't fly.

  • @fake1009: "then you can't fly"... commercially.

  • how can i take a handgun with me when crossing a boarder?? since i have a handgun license and use it for protection only (i never shot at a person in my life)

    would they accept my request to take a firearm across the boarder with me if i have the license for it??

  • THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

    UN General Assembly Resolution 217A (III) of 10 December 1948)

    Article 13

    1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

    2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

  • @LottsaLasagna

    That declaration isnt worth the paper its writen on.

  • Racism definitly plays a part when you cross borders. I had to empty all my belongings and had a thorough check through the clothing i wore because the metal detector beeped when it crossed my belt buckle.

    Whereas when a ( suprise suprise) white man got beeped for his belt buckle the officer ignored it.

  • @ReggaeZal well maybe you just came off like a jackass and they didint have time for your shit lol

  • How they hell did i come off as a jackass, i just walked up to the bloody thing and the officer just told me to empty all my belongings into the tray.

  • is that not just how the security is at this time?

  • @ReggaeZal sorry I called you a jackass but how is it racist and what would you do in times of fear like this ?

  • Im brown, and i was the only one amongst all the white people who were checked coincidently i was the only one asked to empty all my belongings into the tray.

  • @ReggaeZal I'm in the US Army. Over the last decade I have worn the US Army uniform or Army Combat Uniform (ACU) while flying to and from Iraq. In 2005, i was ordered to take off my boots, my belt, empty my pockets, show ID, etc. In 2007, i was ordered to do the same. I'm white. In spite of wearing my uniform i was treated like a criminal each time because the current system treats everyone as a criminal. If the TSA does not treat you like a criminal consider yourself lucky.

  • what race are you?

  • im never traveling on airlines again fuck that. fucking chick was screening my stuff & she kept saying " anything else sir" i thought she going to ask me to put my balls up to be screened too. fuck em!!!!!!!1

  • Always carry a copy of Pentagon's Operation Northwoods, and ABC News' report on Northwoods, with an article on the Israeli attack on USS Liberty, hand them to TSA airport screeners, pilots and crew. Too bad 1,000s of TSA screeners are illegal aliens.

  • LOL imagine someone leaning out their car window and yelling out at the dog "I dont consent to any searches".

  • LMAO!!!

  • wow that really sucks i really didnt know not even knowin!!

  • "the only people who have any problems with the police r criminals and thier famely and friends."

    Tell that to the 46 people jailed and convicted in Tulia, Texas by the testimony of a single informant... that was lying.

  • Pleease forgive, I was 'bullshitting' the ironweasele for his very sheltered insight.

  • No prob.

  • having grown up in a bad neighborhood and now being a cop I know what I am talking about. I nor my famely was never afraid of or had any probs with the cops cause we had no reason to be. But my neighbors who were selling crack on the other hand...

  • cops abuse and persecute in the name of law and order and will suffer in the final wrath those with eyes let them see

  • bull shit

  • Don't believe me. Do your own research.

    Google: tulia police informant

  • Tell that to Rodney King. I don't hate cops, but I understand that they are humans. As with any group of humans, 80% of them are assholes, and 20% are cool. That's 1 in 5. I am educated, responsible and hard working. I pay my taxes. I told a cop he couldn't search me when I was waiting for a bus. He thought I was selling drugs. He searched me anyway. I got a $50,000 settlement. Cops forget their role. They enforce the law, they don't create it.

  • way to go

  • @MPMaarek I don't know you but I'm so proud of you.....

  • @MPMaarek Rodney King was beyond provoking, and the fact that people used it as an excuse to loot and murder makes me hate the fact that people use him as an example of Police brutality, other then that, I completely agree with you, I'm a total advocate against PB. My sister was beaten and maced at a peaceful protest in California.

  • @MPMaarek I don't think they teach them anything besides how to be a dick at the police academy

  • iron weasle: Obtuse or acute "angles" most of them seem rather obtuse and far from 'cute.

  • WRONG

  • whats WRONG?

  • I replied to some guy who said something dumb but I don't remember who or what anymore.

  • To remember who you said what to, go to the bottom of the page and click Show All (however many) Comments. It will take you to a new page showing either all comments, or a large number of them sorted where the replys are under the comments replied to. Go to your top Windows toolbar, click Edit. In the dropdown menu, click Find. a bar opens at the bottom of the screen. Type your SN in the box, and keep clicking Next (to the right of the box) until you find your forgotten comment.

  • Sorry...they are international zones...you have some rights still, but not all those American ones. Theres a reason they are called "international airports". Heard a story about a friends friend, had his car stripped wheels taken off steering wheel off and seats off, and the guards at the border didnt give him as much as a socket wrench to put anything back together.

  • It seems clearer everyday that its us and them.

    Police take an oath to protect and serve, but to protect and serve who and why do they most always seem to be at war with us the citizens.

    With speed traps - red light cameras that speed up the yellow light - following us in their cars, waiting for us to make a mistake so they can fine us - trained in coersion to force us to waive our 4th amendment.

    Officer Friendly is dead!!!

  • Thank you. Their are a lot of idiots out there who think cops are all angels..

  • It is true that SOME police are guilty of provoking an incident, solely to entice people to cross that line, and with their training in the art of the pen they can ultimately serve their local D/A. While the citizens they promised to protect and serve play second fiddle.

  • The ACLU, from my perspective is educating the public on our rights as Americans, which can sometimes frustrate those in law enforcement who think they are in Nazi Germany and wish to remove the speed bumps that we call The Bill of Rights.

  • Please mnpd007, do not post misinformation.

    Educate yourself first before replying. The ACLU

    has a free website. They deal mainly with governmental abuse of US citizens Constitutional rights.

  • What about boarder patrol searches within 100 miles of a boarder?

  • CORRECT!! I fully agree.