Sen Coburn (R-OK) Questions Kagan (Full Video)

[melissatubman]

cool clip thanks for sharing ..

[Leigh306]

wsg2112-sounds like you said it would be an injustice to have a Supreme Court. You have nothing to say about what exactly you think would be "injustice" in Kagan's appointment?

[wsg2112]

Everyone contact their Senators NOW, and let them know how much of an injustice it would be to the American people to have this person on the Supreme Court !!!

[FreeinTX]

Imagine my suprise, if the long pause between comments is this guy actually watching these videos.

[FreeinTX]

He also said the reason for this was to, "create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole."

[FreeinTX]

Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies. "

Do you know who said this?

[FreeinTX]

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

[Standup091]

ALERT: Elena KAGAN is a ANTI-AMERICAN Progressive liberal.  She does not believe in the Constitution.

[surgewakefield]

Funny, Mr. Coburn has a problem with telling people they have to eat vegetables but as soon as they smoke one he's fine with putting them in prison.

"In this country, marijuana remains a Schedule I drug and is known as the ``gateway drug,'' because it can lead to the abuse of more dangerous substances. For this reason, the next ONDCP Director must be a strong opponent of marijuana and all illegal drugs"

Talk about senseless laws... Can you say hypocrite?

[eatmelibs]

BLAAAA,BLAAAA,BLAAAA.......Pla­titudes!!.......Platitudes!!..­.....Platitudes!! NO CONTENT WORTH A DAMB! huh.....where did she learn that type talk..?.....OH, Yeah!! Her great buddy, Barrack!.....That's how he ran, by speaking a bunch of bullshit that people were willing to eat! well, the Dumb Asses amongst us ate his bullshit sandwiches.

[masercot]

Wow! An ignorant redneck with no idea what the process is for is appealing to ignorant rednecks all across the country...

[eatmelibs]

@masercot Explain it than, Genius. Please, explain to the rest of us how the judicial confirmations work. After all, you are the smartest one here. Explain how her dodging of questions, inwhich constitutional law and it's interpretation apply, constitute for honest answers.Tell us, oh wise one, how a person with whom can not answer whether or not the Gov. has the right to tell us what we can eat (put in our body's) and yet she thinks woman have abortion rights (take out of their body).

[masercot]

@eatmelibs Well son, if you've watched the hearings, you know that you are seeing vague questions asked of someone that is being considered for a role in the government concerned with specifics. So, Coburn asks a vague question, then starts talking about something else before she can answer and you girls eat it up...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "Coburn asks a vague question, then starts talking about something else before she can answer"

Well, at least you acknowledge that they are throwing her a bunch of B-LLSH-T questions so they can look tough, all the while knowing that they are gonna conform her.

If they wanted her gone. They would address the REAL issues. Her arguements to ban free speech and books. Her not being "sypathetic" to gun owners in a gun ban case that would ban ALL guns.

[masercot]

@FreeinTX You girls gotta keep your lies straight. She wasn't talking about banning anything. CONTEXT, son... Check out the case that your heroes claim to be "quoting"...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "She wasn't talking about banning anything, CONTEXT,"

QUOTE, "“If it’s a 500-page book, and at the end it says, ‘and so vote for x,’ the government could ban that?”"

Now, what CONTEXT should I take that to mean that she is NOT advocatri9ng the banning of "anything."

[masercot]

@FreeinTX I still have to say that you haven't read the transcripts, son. Not good to let yourself get spoon-fed.  I always try to go to the source...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

And the big ones, her relationship with Goldman Sachs, her association with Cass Sunstien and his COMMUNIST beliefs, her position on hiring requirments for employers, her role in the Siegelman case, her comparison of the NRA to the KKK, her role in stopping 9/11 victims family's lawsuits, her role in Ruby Ridge, and then ask her why she has only hired 1 black person in her entire career.

Will she recuse herself on Goldman Sach cases?

These questions would END her quest quick!

[masercot]

@FreeinTX Yeah! Why isn't anyone asking those questions? You are funny, son, as if the neocons in congress don't know about these incidents. She worked for Goldman Sachs and earned 10000 over a few years. She wasn't a CEO. And, perhaps you should research what a lawyer does. When she worked for the government, she argued cases for the government regardless of her belief. Are you twelve? You think every defense attorney advocates murder?

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "She worked for Goldman Sachs and earned 10000 over a few years. She wasn't a CEO."

NOONE said she was the CEO of Goldman Sachs. What I said was that they need to ask her if she will recuse herself from ANY CASE that involves Goldman Sachs while she sits on the bench, You ADMIT that GS was a client of hers, and that she has consulted for them, therefore, she is OBLIGATED to recuse herself when former GS employees are looking at PRISON TIME failing an appeal in the SC

[masercot]

@FreeinTX If the judge in the BP case is any indication, I'd say that the judge must be making that decision on a case by case basis, don't you think?

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "When she worked for the government, she argued cases for the government regardless of her belief."

That is ABSOLUTELY TRUE! However, since it was HER making the arguement, and HER using HER logical thinking processes, and HER answering questions that the judges asked, and HER trying to win the arguements for the government, as is HER job. Don't you think we ought to know how she REALLY feels about these things now that she is NOT a g man, but rather a SC nominee?

[masercot]

@FreeinTX How she really feels? She is supposed to interpret the law, if she came in with an agenda, you girls will scream about that as well. Neocons are like old women, they'll bitch no matter what happens...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "How she really feels? She is supposed to interpret the law."

Ok,"feels"isn't the right word. As a person arguing for the government she argued to BAN BOOKS. Now, that may be a position taken by the government she represented, but if she believes that it is a valid position, and maybe she does maybe she doesn't but she argued the case, so I would like to know if she actually believes that banning books is legit, or if she argues bad cases because its her job.

[masercot]

@FreeinTX Obviously, if the context was that she wanted to ban books, she'd never get confirmed. Read the FULL dialog. Or, remain ignorant...it is your choice, son...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

Nice how you tried to wind a list of over a dozen reasons why the republicans, if they really wanted to could derail this confirmation by exposing that she is a commie b-tch after our guns and our free speech to protect her Goldman Sachs overloards while they steal everything, by saying, "if the context was that she wanted to ban books, she'd never get confirmed."

She has gone FAR FURTHER than just wanting to ban books!

[masercot]

@FreeinTX Wow! A dozen? Well, then why aren't the Republicans derailing the appointment?

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You asked, "A dozen? Well, then why aren't the Republicans derailing the appointment? "

PAY ATTENTION!

The IDIOT asking the Goldman Sachs B-tch a question has NO INTENTION of re-railing this nomination because HE, just like the Goldman Sachs b-tch, is simply following orders given to him from above.

This is the FALSE LEFT RIGHT PARADEIGM! It is NOT REAL, and the players are ACTORS trying to decieve YOU! Wanna see bi-partisanship? Have them vote on sending money to Israel.

[masercot]

@FreeinTX So, it's all a big conspiracy by republicans and democrats to ban books and guns...you figured it out, child. You must be a Glenn Beck fan...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "it's all a big conspiracy by republicans and democrats to ban books and guns...you figured it out, child.  You must be a Glenn Beck fan... "

Glen Beck, like Andi Cooper, are CIA dis-info agents. Beck is there to make REAL libertarians look bad, and he does a good job at it. He's a f-ck0n MORON! OK?

And it is a big consperacy by GLOBALIST to destroy American soverignty, circumvent the Constitution and evicerate the Bill of Rights! Just like they ADMIT trying to do!

[masercot]

@FreeinTX So, I have two questions: First, when did this conspiracy begin? And, second, who isn't part of it???

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You asked, "when did this conspiracy begin?'

The "consperacy" to reunite the crown with the colonies began in May of 1776 when it was OBVIOUS they would lose the colonies to the people. Just like the kings of old building castles that took generations to complete, some things take time.

You asked, "who isn't part of it???" The people who love this country, respect the Constitution, and stand by the Bill of Rights as view these documents as LAWS that RESTRICT government!

[masercot]

@FreeinTX So, the "conspiracy" began at our country's inception and everyone who is elected to office is in on it? Any proof of these weighty claims?

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

But hey, I just posted a quote by BILL CLINTONS Rhode Scholar mentor that explains what they are trying to do. Are you calling him a liar? Do you know about what Cecil Rhodes (Rhode Scholar) was trying to accomplish according to Cecil Rhodes? Rockefeller, Kissenger, Bush (both of them), Rothchilde, The Queen of the Netherlands, the Prince and a duke in England, all touting the same montra!

[FreeinTX]

@masercot Here watch this; ENDGAME: Blueprint for Global Enslavement watch?v=x-CrNlilZho It has a FULL BIBIOGRAPHY at whatistheendgame Learn Barry Soetoro's role. watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw Learn Al-CIA'da and Bin Ladens role. watch?v=28tE0fKpISM Learn FEMA's role watch?v=Klqv9t1zVww WAKE UP!!!

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

It's a wrestling match. It's the WWF in DC! Quit falling for it. Barry Soetoro has EXPANDED every single one of the Bush policies. Torture, spying, wars, invasions, occupations, murder, the Patriot Act, domestic security, rights restrictions, privacy violations, war on terror, NAFTA, SPP, bail-outs. What the hell has "changed?" Now we are being FORCED to buy insurance from CRIMINAL SCUM and calling it health insurance reform?

[masercot]

@FreeinTX If none of it is real...why are you commenting on it? 

[eatmelibs]

@FreeinTX couldn't have said it better myself.........

[FreeinTX]

@eatmelibs

Thx, Much appreciated.

[thebackbencher666]

@masercot really irrelevant how? the fact that the commerce clause is being used as precedence for socialized medicine (see me video on virginia suing over obamadeathcare)... in ny they have tried to ban salt with the theory being that it affects commerce by raising all of our health care costs.its perfectly relevant.

[masercot]

@thebackbencher666 Yeah, son...let me know when we get socialized medicine. Right now it is still subject to the greed of large corporations and is doled out to the highest bidders...unless you want emergency care... When you vomit what others tell you to say, you might want to check it first for accuracy...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said to the other guy, "...let me know when we get socialized medicine. "

THAT's RIGHT, they f-ck-n lied to the "left" too! The insurance companies WROTE the law, and the IDIOTS on the left supported it because they thought Congress would comprimise into something better. Never mind that the ins companies said they would pull supoprt if there was a gov option, so it was NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN!

Now, it's a FASCIST healthcare plan that NOONE likes!

[thebackbencher666]

@masercot dosent matter what you want to call it.the question is not irrelevant when they are using the commerce clause in ny under the guise of cost to ban foods or make them unprofitable through taxation you walking failed abortion.since you have trouble reading let me repeat it.in ny they went to war against salt,soda,transfats and smokes.the argument being that health care for all would go up if these nasty habits were continued.where is personal liberty? the question is totally relevant.

[FreeinTX]

@thebackbencher666

Nice!

Saw that coming, and I remember hearing about the salt tax, but didn't know it was EXACTLY like it was planned DECADES ago.

This happened with welfare back in the 70's. They based the payment amounts on the number of kids you had, then used the increased costs of having more kids by welfare parents, to justify all sorts of horrible things.

[thebackbencher666]

@FreeinTX (i dont know if it was decades ago)the main point being that if the commerce clause is applied as the obama administration wants it to in the case of its health care argument then there is no limit as to what the state can not do.if you fall off your bike they can ban bikes because to many people fall of bikes and its costing our health care system to much.you have now opened the door for absolute tyranny and simply saying the gov wont does not mean we should let have the opportunity.

[thebackbencher666]

@thebackbencher666 this makes the question completely relevant despite what utter and complete bag of cunt @masercot would like you to believe.

[masercot]

@thebackbencher666 So, New York the state is using federal statutes to ban trans fats? What you probably mean, son, is that New York is trying to raise taxes on trans fat products IN VIOLATION of the commerce clause...

[masercot]

@thebackbencher666 Where is personal liberty? Where was it when we jammed japanese-americans into prisons? Where was it when they outlawed drugs? Where was it when they outlawed abortion? Where was it when blacks were forced to pay poll tax or take poll tests? You dumbass! If you don't complain when other people's freedoms are lost, you don't deserve your trans-fats, boy...

[thebackbencher666]

@masercot so let me guess this right product of incest...because liberties have been stolen in the past we should allow the government to keep stealing it? is that you point cum breath? so instead of arguing that liberty will not be infringed upon you give me a list of past stolen liberties? thats your defense? how the fuck do you type with a straight jacket on?

[eatmelibs]

@masercot You're right, son, they should ask more pressing questions concerning finding a pubic hair on a coke can. (Justice Thomas-was railroaded with "Bogus" questioning) Yeah, you're right......,son.

[masercot]

@eatmelibs Railroaded? Thomas was confirmed, child. If he'd been "railroaded", he would've been rejected. Try not using slang if you don't know what it means...

[eatmelibs]

@masercot he was confirmed.....,son, that wasn't my point, dumb ass. You are asking and talking about the line of questioning inwhich I'm responding to. Do you know how to carry on a conversation, son, or do you just bounce around like a ball? Keep it within context upon the conversation at hand, Son. Get back in your parents basement, smoke your weed and leave grown up conversations to the Big Boys, ok.......son.

[masercot]

@eatmelibs If it wasn't your point, child, use the appropriate words to express yourself. To "railroad" is to convict someone through flimsy evidence. Take an ESL course if the language isn't your first one. If your point was that Thomas being treated roughly during his appointment hearing makes up for one hundred years of black oppression, I'd have to disagree, son...

[eatmelibs]

@masercot For fuck's sake!! You go Off on such a tangent....I don't know where to begin! You're such a tool-bag! Who the Fuck was talking about "Black Oppression"!! Damn!! Your like talking to a mental patient! Fuck it! I give up! By the way, son, You are not my father....Fag! With that said......Go Fuck Yourself! Retard!!.....................s­on

[masercot]

@eatmelibs I wrote about personal liberty. You answered with a diatribe about Thomas. I think that you're the one jumping about, son. And, you seem pretty excitable. You shouldn't be 'cause most of your kind looks stupid when they are forced to define what they are talking about...you are not alone, son...

[eatmelibs]

@masercot Geee, thanks dad! By the way, have you changed your depends yet?Have you taken your alzheimer's medication? Make sure when you go out side, for your morning walk, to bring your cane so you won't fall and break a hip.OH, and dad, you really need to consider getting off the marijuana, they do have other medications for your cataracts......(it's affecting your memory) Well, that's all I got, dad. Please don't have anymore kids! and tell mom to wash the stank off that hole. Love ya, dad.

[masercot]

@eatmelibs Farewell...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

You said, "So, the "conspiracy" began at our country's inception and everyone who is elected to office is in on it? Any proof of these weighty claims?"

Oh ya, way to twist my words around!!! Nice!

Now, I linked you proof before along with SEVERAL other videos to fill in gaps. Again, watch;

watch?v=x-CrNlilZho

This has a FULL BIBLIOGRAPHY (you know what that is right?) with LINKS to the EXACT PLACE where you can look at the ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS yourself.

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

And what about the Carrol Quigley quote? He is sitting there, as Bill Clintons mentor, saying that the LEFT RIGHT PARADEIGM is COMPLETE B-LLSH-T and just a trick they use to allow GLOBALIST BANKSTERS to come in and take control of every country in the world. You aske for proof, yet competely ignore anything I post.

The Complete Idiot's Guide to the New World Order

watch?v=XRLPG_HplrA

[masercot]

@FreeinTX Oh, I don't doubt that the folks with money run everything behind the scenes. My doubt is with your contention that it is a conspiracy that includes everyone in government and has existed since our country's inception...

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

Sorry misread the 1st portion of your comments.

But if you will acknowledge that he money masters run everything, then what the hell are you doing defending the very B-TCH that they are trying to install? Did it ever occur to you that these people should go to PRISON fo what they are doing? And that this SKANK is gonna make sure that NEVER happens?

[masercot]

@FreeinTX Actually, the people who run things NEVER go to prison...and never will. And, if other folks run things, why does it matter who goes to the supreme court?

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

Run everything behind the scenes is called a FASCIST TYRANNICAL DICTATORSHIP where the only PRETEND to let you vote! Now, I don't know why ANYONE could understand that this is what they are doing, yet stand by and let it happen, like it is no big deal. These CRIMINAL SCUM have stolen over $30 TRILLION in the last 18 months, and intend to cover their tracks with a MILITARY POLICE STATE the world has never seen! And YOU sit there and cheerlead!

[FreeinTX]

@masercot

And just a note, They are gonna kill YOU too!

They hate YOU, their little minion horde, MORE than they hate us.

NIGHT OF THE LONGKNIVES!!!

[masercot]

@FreeinTX I don't live my life worrying about that.  I've planted my seeds already...

[MrWsad]

@FreeinTX you're a COMPLETE moron.

[eatmelibs]

She's getting Creemed! She doesn't have a clue of the position she even is to apply. What an Idiot! She's trying to hide who she really is with little success, in my opinion. Come On!! Show us your horns and tail! And by the way, she needs to brush her teeth.....she's stinking up the room with your Trout like breath! Ya, know you're all thinking it.....

[cowboyshooter1]

Love Coburn, He can turn any Liberal Puke into a Babbling Bafoon

[tomscaters]

She answered every one of his questions with absolutely no reason. She dodges bullets quite effectively. She completely dodged the Commerce Clause question he asked her.

[oliverave1234]

Coburn is a genius at cross examining a witness, i.e. at getting Kagan to tell us who she really is. He says he's not a lawyer. Huh! I'd like him on my side any time anywhere.

[aknotz]

I wish she'd just answer the question not dance around and giving complex answers that have virtually nothing to do with the question.

[bigdogphoto]

The ability of government to force us to buy health insurance is no different than Congress telling us what we have to eat.

Why could she not answer this simple question?

Why does she support a law that would allow the possiblity of banning of books?

When will these tyrants shut down or censor/limit internet content?

What limits the power of these tyrannical "public servants"?

Way to flush out another liberty robbing radical progressive Sen. Coburn!

[getplaning]

I was listening to this today...All I could think of was, "What an ASShole!" It just got worse and worse. Kagan should have laughed at him and asked him if there was a question in there somewhere.

[aknotz]

@getplaning Well if you were interviewing for one of 9 jobs in the highest achievable position in your country, I surely hope they wouldn't just hand you the job on a silver platter.

[marquedesade]

@getplaning Asshole for pointing out a snake in the grass? Asshole for speaking truth to power?

[getplaning]

@marquedesade Oh, yeah, she's so POWERFUL. You guys are pathetic tools.

[eatmelibs]

@getplaning You're a Fuckin' Idiot! She has NO expierence on the Bench! D.S.! Just as your beloved "Savior" President had NO expierence in running Anything. (The guy couldn't run a lemonade stand) If you can not see she is totally lost in answering these questions, then you are equally a waste of space. You libs can Dish it Out, But when someone does the same you cry like pussy little bitches! Change your Huggies, Pussy! And get over it!