A Few Problems Not Addressed Concerning the Collapse of WTC 7

[Jimbofx911]

The biggest problem with the nist report on building 7 is the nist report on building 7. It is a fairy tale at best, not science and certainly not truthful. What do you expect when the same power system in place that designed the attacks on WTC pay for the investigation into it. Sad situation.

[Nomilus]

Citizenfor911truth1, thank you for your relentless pursuit of truth. The world is fortunate to have folks like you. We need your supporters, too - those who aren't afraid to step out and support fringe theories, such as yours. Without you, and those like you, those of us who are prone to common sense and analytical thinking would have no sounding board to reaffirm our sanity. Thank you for your relentless pursuit of attention, that we might be entertained by the kooks of this world.

[SuperNiemi]

This video is consistent and makes a lot of good points. Very good work.

[251omega]

Sarcasm is a great tool, but by reading some of the comments, they STILL don't get it! They take this video COMPLETELY on face-value. I guess we can only hope that someone they TRUST will EXPLAIN it to them...

The "hijackers" could not have placed the EXPLOSIVES in all THREE buildings. The Arabs could not have made the military STAND DOWN. The ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS could not carry out the COVER-UP. 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB. THAT'S the name of my Cable-Access TV Show...Youtube Channel: 251omega

[FartyBeard]

What music did you use for this video? Thanks.

[terrymanning1]

1) The impact damage from wtc1 caused a partial pancake collapse of the south side, similar to Ronan Point.

2) These are not squibs, more likely smoke escaping when glass broke as the building kinked. No flashes & bangs rule out explosives.

3)The NIST collapse simulation shows a different angle to the camera angle you compare it with.

[terrymanning1]

@terrymanning1 cont.

4) Free fall speed for 2.5 seconds in a collapse time of over 16 seconds proves nothing. The comparison you use with another building is irrelevent because it's a smaller building and entirely different construct.

Basically, everything you present here is BS and/or a strawman argument designed to deceive the ignorant.

[mcguirejohnf]

thanks for the fantastic video. i was especially impressed by the layover of the nist model and the actual building. many of us, myself included, started our quest for 'truth' with the anomalies concerning wtc7. i was wondering if you wouldnt mind taking this section of the video and publishing it independently as a shorter clip (we need to cater to the soundbite culture we are trying to educate)... also, perhaps we can change the voice-over... it sounds sort of creepy... no offense. lol!!

[citizenfor911truth1]

@mcguirejohnf

I'm working on a new WTC 7 video right now that is definitly going to be better than this one. I'll send it to you when it's done. Glad you liked it.

[mcguirejohnf]

@citizenfor911truth1

i posted it on a couple of the sites cuz i know people are going to want to use the nist model clip... i just figured out how to use movie maker too, so im going to put just that section up. please be sure to post your new movie to the relevant facebook groups (i assume you are on fb... if not, you should consider it). thanks again for your work on this!!! oh, i made my first 9/11 clip, check it out:

[mcguirejohnf]

thanks for the fantastic video. i was especially impressed by the layover of the nist model and the actual building. many of us, myself included, started our quest for 'truth' with the anomalies concerning wtc7. i was wondering if you wouldnt mind taking this section of the video and publishing it independently as a shorter clip (we need to cater to the soundbite culture we are trying to educate)... also, perhaps we can change the voice-over... it sounds sort of creepy... no offense.  lol!!

[ISamuelII]

It was all cleared up on liberty forum a long time ago the "gash" is actually a black tarp draped over the side. I believe it was a guy named 'wadosy' or similar spelling that covered that tarp issue. The threads on the issue were basically wrapped up with the agreement of all but the paid shills, a black tarp it is.

These 'squibs' could be the slight twisting of and snapping of the glass. CD definitely, but the 2 towers really show some blast squibs. Silversteins confession is good enough.

[citizenfor911truth1]

@ISamuelII

Could you please send me link that says it was a tarp? Because I really doubt that's what it actually is.

[SlackerSlayer]

@citizenfor911truth1 Love to, but the forum that all this took place at is still not providing its pages. The web still holds the name etc for Liberty Forum but it has been sabotaged for telling and spreading the truth. I can ask around other places for anyone else that remembers that thread topic. The search engines are full off white noise on this.

[ThePeage]

This is very good. I do feel a little uneasy about the suggestion that the video shows "squibs". I had always assumed that what you highlight as being squibs was simply windows breaking as the structure deformed as it collapsed. Of course, the fact that so many windows were intact is a fair reason for doubting the temperatures that NIST claims, but it is a separate issue from the concept of squibs.

[citizenfor911truth1]

A fair observation. And I would probably agree with you about the squib issue if it weren't for the fact that they appeared in a fairly straight row, which is typical of controlled demolitions. And the fact that NIST doesn't even address them in their report also makes me suspicious.

[ThePeage]

You may be right but I think it is a questionable one. I have no doubt it was a controlled demolition - but it's possible that the windows shattered in a more or less straight row as a result of the collapse - the "folding" necessary to collapse it into its footprint. Maybe NIST ignored them coz shattering windows are expected. If they had shattered in that manner before the building fell, I'd be 100% with you on it. As it is, I'm not so sure. Otherwise, good job though! :o)

[Skeptic121]

Great job! As a next step, let's ask NIST to release the raw data that was used to run their simulation. What assumptions about temperature steel strength did they make? We should also ask NIST to release the blueprints for WTC7. Right now, we must estimate the height of each floor.

There is NO legitimate reason to keep such information secret. The East Anglia University climate change e-mail scandal illustrates once again that secrecy is utterly incompatible with science.

[MrPolysyllabic]

Just identify the people who are trying to stop the criminal trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. Right now they are trying to make it seem like a security issue, a foreign policy issue, a military protocol issue. At the end of the day it simply boils down to the REAL masterminds not wanting Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to defend himself. All the evidence countless Americans have asked for in the last 8 years will come out in that courtroom. Then, it will become Terrorist propoganda to even discuss it.

[Oceanno69]

The ONLY Peeps Not getting that 911 was an inside job are those who works for the fbi or cia!

[chunkyboy100]

great. cant wait 4 the debunkers to fumble their way through this!!!!!

[mooners40]

excellent work - as usual - great post - the truth will out - peace