Was this guy born with that tallent,I play little jazz guitar , unfortunately I started late, i love jazz guitar .Joe pass , Wes montgomery,pat martino.list goes on .nice music
@Gilly4727 He grew up with music as his first language, all our children have similar potential, but if you don't teach them the language earlier enough it will always be a second language and not a native language. If it's 85 then he's 19 because he's the same age as me, I play jazz but I didn't even touch a guitar until I was 13 and by that age he was a virtuoso.
@gr0mithtimon every person in the world grows up more or less to be a virtuoso in their own language, but few of them are poets. There is a difference between exposing your child to the language and forcing them to sit and practice. All children grasp and learn things that are a natural part of their lives. My 4 year old already knows how to bake bread, but I didn't sit him in front of a blackboard to show him, he makes it with me.
Thats a strange definition of virtuoso you are using there. In my eyes, a virtuoso is someone who is in complete control of their art, unhampered by practical limitations. Thats certainly not true for the general population concerning language. Sure, children grasp and learn things that are a natural part of their lives (and easier then when being force fed), but some children learn certain things much faster then others. Environment is just one (important) factor.
@gr0mithtimon I don't think it's a wrong definition. A given persons vocabulary may not be huge, but they utilize it effortlessly. Does a virtuoso have to know every scale and arpeggio that exists to make great music and play virtuosically even if they only use 10% of their knowledge. If you have to think about how to construct a sentence you are not a virtuoso for sure. Do you have to think about how to construct a sentence when you speak?
Reading research papers by my peers (first year physics bachelor) convinced me that many need to think deeply about how to construct sentences, and still fail.
I don't think a virtuoso has to know every scale and arpeggio, if they can play without. That is, if not knowing those scales does not limit them in what they can do on their instrument. Most people don't utilize their vocabulary effortlessly, i don't know why you think that..
It also depends on your definition of a virtuoso and if you insist on elevating the status of some saying they have a special skill.
As a teacher of art and music for 20+ years I can see what inhibits peoples development in these areas and while I cannot definitively say what makes one person better than another, I can see that we all have the potential to be virtuosos given circumstances and guidance and the way we learn language is a key to unlock this.
@gr0mithtimon part 1 by your peers research papers are you implying their 'grammar' is wrong? Grammar is just a guide line. Communicating ideas is far more important than the structure it's delivered in. Language evolves. Rules inhibit language. What we speak now bears little resemblance to language a 1000 years ago
The left side of the brain deals with language. If we can make music with the left side of the brain then it will flow. But first the right side has to make sense of it.
Rules inhibit language? Thats a pretty dull point of view. Without rules, language has no meaning, and communication is impossible. You need rules, be they written or unwritten. There are arguments for keeping the rules the same (f.e. to ensure the documents of today are easier to read in half a century then reading those of a 500 years ago is today) .
Mistakes in grammar often inhibit the communication of ideas, especially in areas where precise formulation is important.
@gr0mithtimon The laws of physics are unbreakable by humans, but human rules often inhibit growth. The tritone interval in music was banned for centuries by the church for it's devilish sound but it is the cornerstone of harmonic tension and release and the basis of most music today. Especially jazz. The rules of language are just patterns developed through the growth of language, and they will always be changing and growing no matter how much societies try to restrict them by imposing rules.
I certainly agree with your first and your last sentence, but that doesn't imply rules in general are bad. The tritone ban was a stupid rule. However, I don't think the existence of bad rules is an argument for having no rules. We should judge rules on their validity, and in language there is much to say for some conservatism. In my language (dutch) its a torture to read anything more then a 100 years old. English fares much better because of official rules.
there's some weird vibrato
paganinilovedkebab 4 months ago
Lâtchi bâcheba !
Zanetniglo 4 months ago
que grande!
tinkiwinkixeraser 4 months ago
he looks so nervous but that genius comes through..
aaronamccoy 7 months ago
The Most boring Comments Ever ,
just type ( Nice vid , thanks for posting , i liked it .., AWESOME ,,, etc )
it will do great ....
" thank you for sharing this Epic vid (kapitanswing) keep them comming "
FatFahad 1 year ago
RIP Diz
b0b1919 1 year ago
Very nice indeed! Thank you.
jonno52 2 years ago
Was this guy born with that tallent,I play little jazz guitar , unfortunately I started late, i love jazz guitar .Joe pass , Wes montgomery,pat martino.list goes on .nice music
Gilly4727 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@Gilly4727 He grew up with music as his first language, all our children have similar potential, but if you don't teach them the language earlier enough it will always be a second language and not a native language. If it's 85 then he's 19 because he's the same age as me, I play jazz but I didn't even touch a guitar until I was 13 and by that age he was a virtuoso.
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@TheCompleteGuitarist In China, many parents have their children practice 8 hours per day. This rarely leads to something interesting.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
@gr0mithtimon every person in the world grows up more or less to be a virtuoso in their own language, but few of them are poets. There is a difference between exposing your child to the language and forcing them to sit and practice. All children grasp and learn things that are a natural part of their lives. My 4 year old already knows how to bake bread, but I didn't sit him in front of a blackboard to show him, he makes it with me.
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@TheCompleteGuitarist
Thats a strange definition of virtuoso you are using there. In my eyes, a virtuoso is someone who is in complete control of their art, unhampered by practical limitations. Thats certainly not true for the general population concerning language. Sure, children grasp and learn things that are a natural part of their lives (and easier then when being force fed), but some children learn certain things much faster then others. Environment is just one (important) factor.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
@gr0mithtimon I don't think it's a wrong definition. A given persons vocabulary may not be huge, but they utilize it effortlessly. Does a virtuoso have to know every scale and arpeggio that exists to make great music and play virtuosically even if they only use 10% of their knowledge. If you have to think about how to construct a sentence you are not a virtuoso for sure. Do you have to think about how to construct a sentence when you speak?
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@TheCompleteGuitarist
Reading research papers by my peers (first year physics bachelor) convinced me that many need to think deeply about how to construct sentences, and still fail.
I don't think a virtuoso has to know every scale and arpeggio, if they can play without. That is, if not knowing those scales does not limit them in what they can do on their instrument. Most people don't utilize their vocabulary effortlessly, i don't know why you think that..
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@gr0mithtimon part 2
It also depends on your definition of a virtuoso and if you insist on elevating the status of some saying they have a special skill.
As a teacher of art and music for 20+ years I can see what inhibits peoples development in these areas and while I cannot definitively say what makes one person better than another, I can see that we all have the potential to be virtuosos given circumstances and guidance and the way we learn language is a key to unlock this.
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@gr0mithtimon part 1 by your peers research papers are you implying their 'grammar' is wrong? Grammar is just a guide line. Communicating ideas is far more important than the structure it's delivered in. Language evolves. Rules inhibit language. What we speak now bears little resemblance to language a 1000 years ago
The left side of the brain deals with language. If we can make music with the left side of the brain then it will flow. But first the right side has to make sense of it.
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@TheCompleteGuitarist
Rules inhibit language? Thats a pretty dull point of view. Without rules, language has no meaning, and communication is impossible. You need rules, be they written or unwritten. There are arguments for keeping the rules the same (f.e. to ensure the documents of today are easier to read in half a century then reading those of a 500 years ago is today) .
Mistakes in grammar often inhibit the communication of ideas, especially in areas where precise formulation is important.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
@gr0mithtimon The laws of physics are unbreakable by humans, but human rules often inhibit growth. The tritone interval in music was banned for centuries by the church for it's devilish sound but it is the cornerstone of harmonic tension and release and the basis of most music today. Especially jazz. The rules of language are just patterns developed through the growth of language, and they will always be changing and growing no matter how much societies try to restrict them by imposing rules.
TheCompleteGuitarist 1 year ago
@TheCompleteGuitarist
I certainly agree with your first and your last sentence, but that doesn't imply rules in general are bad. The tritone ban was a stupid rule. However, I don't think the existence of bad rules is an argument for having no rules. We should judge rules on their validity, and in language there is much to say for some conservatism. In my language (dutch) its a torture to read anything more then a 100 years old. English fares much better because of official rules.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
Wo
Cool my friend!
Elferno69 2 years ago
oops! Missed that, Thanks!
kapitanswing 2 years ago
Thank you! The end credits say 1985.
minaees 2 years ago
THAAAAAAAAANKS !
Xiphosss 2 years ago