@paulagloria the simple fact that this gentleman doesn't present any knowledge of the physics involved with tapping an oil reservoir. And the one source he sites is Alex Jones?? Pardon me for being a little skeptical. Peak oil is not a fraud its a fact.
Do you lefties know that "M. King Hubbert" was never an actual person? They say his first name was Marion and he didn't like it, so he shortened it to M., but in fact, "he" was a woman named Marion C. Reynolds who was never even a geologist and worked for an early branch of what we know know as ACORN. The story after that gets complicated but you get the point.
Listen to Alex Jones and you'll educate yourselves on the TRUTH.
I would say, just like there is no concrete evidence of Global warming, there is no concrete evidence of Peak oil as claimed by some people.
Of course, the amount of oil on our planet is finite. But we don't have and proven data that shows that Oil reserves will be exhausted in next 20-30 years.
Global warming fake science is in complete shambles and is falling apart. Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel laureate resigned from APS because he is fed up with Global Warming fear mongering.
The peak oil theory is utterly concrete.It deals in factual quantities and rates.The issue is to get the true figure of production from suppliers which has/is difficult.
Peak oil doesn't lend itself readily to myth.The theory is dealing with actual figures
Hubbert predicted that US production would peak in the early 1970's and he was ridiculed.He turned out be correct. In Australia oil production has peaked. You just have to look at the figures.No.Myth does not sit well with the idea of peak oil
Lol... the prodcutiion peaker because they wanted the price artifically high so the rest of the world would need to buy more dollars in oil.. Not saying that peak oil isn't real but the 70s lowering of production was predistable.
The prediction of the peak has come and gone many times now. This is evidence that the model is flawed. Easy access to these resources are certainly limited, but the hysteric hand waving by the peak oil proponents only proves that this is politics and not science. The same thing goes for the Warmists and their failed model.
Yes, the basic premise has validity, but the introduction of ideology and politics taints the science. My argument is with Malthus.
I'm 5 mins in and i could tear him apart on nearly everything he's said. This is absolute nonsense, and i think it should be deleted from YT as Peak Oil is now a reality and more and more people are educating themselves on it. They dont need to hear this outdated rubbish.
Chris Martenson says it best. Economists have no words for decline, they simply call it negative growth.
These people will be wrestling with numbers right into another dark age if we dont get our voices heard above them.
@paulagloria I think neither are as pressing an issue! Lol.
Radiation Hormesis I've heard of but have not looked at in any kind of detail. Isnt it the debate as to the positive or negative effects of radiation exposure? I'll have a quick peek into it in a mo if i get the chance. I'm open to debate, (as always!) if it is relevant in to the pending Energy Crisis.
Global warming is accepted amongst the wider scientific community and I agree with its thesis.
@moonsugar1 I do not agree with the "science" behind global warming....I had invited the people at the Byrd Polar research center to be part of a round table discussion and every person passed the buk right up to Ronnie Thompson. Almost a billion $ has gone into computer models while water vapor and sun flares or sun anything is never considered. The panel at the UN behind this is not our friend.
@moonsugar1 In 2009 prior to the climate gate controversy 97% of active climate scientists supported AGW theory, but in 2010 a larger survey of climate scientists, post-climate gate, had 34.7% support of AGW. The difference in the numbers was not just from climate gate, but from the survey methods.
@moonsugar1 2009 97% number comes from selecting fewer than 80 anonymous scientific papers.
Funding is selective based on the intent of a given study. Peer review process where all papers were reviewed by the AGW scientific minority shall taint the outcome.
When world money powers insist upon taxing carbon rather than replanting deforested rainforest lands or reclaiming lands subjected to desertification due to fresh water aquifer depletion by tycoon companies, scientists sell out for funding.
@moonsugar1 Weather mod tech has existed predating the NSDM 165 Nixon memo. Hockey stick graph measures extreme anomalies with wide error bars, then data is smoothed & the scale is zoomed in by a very large factor that exceeds the error limits of original data.
Skeptics argued that chemtrails were just a conspiracy theory, but now government documents discuss the topic. Chemtrails, weather modification, & deforestation are all under globalist control affect climate.
@moonsugar1 Carbon tax / credit trading system is BS because the entire system is under globalist tycoon control that caused the fake problem in the first place.
Working poor, middle, & lower classes do not have any choice except for products available on store shelves.
Big globalists control what policies are regarding their factories whether to pollute or to displace manufacturing jobs to other countries or to deforest the Amazon & Mexico & Africa & can vote themselves pay raises & bonuses.
@moonsugar1 If you can tear it to pieces in 5 mins, then do it here for the knowledge-seekers to read and evaluate. I find Webster Tarpley and his analysis to be very enlightening and fruitful when I investigate it further. I fancy his skill with the English language quite a bit too. That being said, I have been hoodwinked more times than I would care to admit, and I am very open to well-stated criticisms that I can investigate the validity of. I warn you though, I am quite in Tarpley's camp.
@jkerri16 I havent got 5 mins right now buddy! lol, got places to be. I'll have to watch the video through again as its been a while since i watched it, and I'll try and get back to you soon. All I would say quickly is that alot has happened since 2006 when this video was uploaded and the actions of oil companies since, as well as international independant bodies, suggests purely in their actions that peak oil is very much a reality. Must dash, speak soon ;)
@moonsugar1 "i think it should be deleted from YT"
Thank you for revealing your true colors. That you would so quickly call for censorship of a view with which you disagree shows you to be someone with no regard for free speech and an explicit fear of an open debate.
So, first he says there's no geologic evidence of oil depletion and then he sites Alex Jones. I now have two very good reasons to not believe a word he says.
Global warming proponents still buy food from Ralph's / Trader Joe's / Whole Foods / WallMart / et cetera. Which depends on oil. If you want to dramatically reduce oil dependence then grow your own food. It's healthier and you don't support two protracted wars.
I side-step the science only because if you wish to believe something no one can convince you to not believe it other than you. I don't really care if people believe in it or not. They'll starve regardless.
@TheJUNGLESURFER What's your proof oil does not originate from primordial sources & Col. Prouty is wrong?
Young children are indoctrinated by the deliberately dumbed down education system. As soon as you realize that some of its teachings are utter nonsense, you will see that it is on purpose to protect its tycoon designers whose think tank groups formulated education policies starting in the 1800s.
If a tycoon can get you to buy his stuff at higher prices, he makes more money from your labor.
Don't believe anyone--think for yourself--check / verify if anyone independently says that other oil reserves exist, yet are untapped.
By Google video searching (energy non-chrisis) a preacher named Lindsey Williams outlines his eye witness accounts of vast quantities of oil found in Alaska that are untapped.
Williams explains in other videos that the monetary system / Wall Street is kept afloat by an investment pact with the Saudi Arabian Arabs.
Identify, track down, list down all speculative non-productive worthless toxic debts, & identify their creators. Then outright cut them out of the financial sectors, put the country on bankruptcy reorganization to seperate illegal & legal debts & re-negotiate the deal with all legal debts and cut out illegal debts from the economy by legally writing them off for they are virtually speculatively worthless. Remove & criminalize central banking, use Hamiltonian banking principles of debt-free cedit
The Y2K - peak oil comparison is bogus and stupid.
Peak Oil is an observation and occurs in every oil field sooner or later. Fields are finite not infinite. As more wells are drilled and pumps added (field pressure drops) there is a peak in the extraction rate of oil. At some point it becomes uneconomic to add pumps. The peak is the maximum extraction rate. That is peak oil. It is that simple. It happens in every oil field, region, nation, and has probably already happened globally.
@harrymook so you are pro or anti nuclear energy? ..I agree there is huge misunderstanding about nuclear energy "I have ultra-low-cost solar panels costing $0.04 per peak watt to make H2 for $100/MT.
@harrymook But we cant make paints, tooth paste, plastic, nylon, gum and other things with solar and wind energy. The problem with oil is that you find it even in your computer. Replace it is going to cost us a huge effort, if we can.
Once you have a source of carbon (any, like plants) you can use pressure and heat to convert it to synthetic crude. Yes its inefficient, but it can be done if you have enough energy of any form.
@paulagloria ¿May I ask you a cuestion? In minute 18:12, Webster says that russian science is based on a guy that acording to him is the greatest mind of the last 300 hundred years. Well, I couldn't hear the name, ¿what's his name? Thanks. (Sorry for my bad english, I'm from Argentina)
@neoconretard LOL, most geologists I have personally met with say Peak Oil is a myth. Lots of oil in Alaska, more in fact than in all of Saudi Arabia. Peak Oil is merely wishful leftist thinking and they are wrong.
I've got an idea: All you guys who believe in abiotic oil should all get together and start your own oil company. You'll save the world from energy shortages and become the richest people in on Earth! ...or maybe you'll just find out it's a bullshit theory.
I've got an idea: All you guys who believe in abiotic oil should all get together and start your own oil company. You'll save the world from energy shortages and become the richest people in on Earth! ...or maybe you'll just find out it's a bullshit theory.
While your guest can spout a lot of information he clearly is not well versed in understanding the bigger picture of peak oil which is a well understood problem even within the oil industry itself. Even Mr. Tarpley briefly admits that it is likely that there will be a peak, but brushes it aside. Knowing that we WILL peak, regardless of the date, we should be eager to face and address the problem rather than deny its reality.
GLUTTONY: just another thing the good ol US of EH has outsourced . . .
Born in Nagano, Japan, Kobayashi set his first record at his rookie appearance on July 4, 2001, when he ate 50 hot dogs in 12 minutes at the Nathan's Coney Island hot dog-eating contest, doubling the previous record of 25.
In my objective opinion, Jones is suspect. Whether he is or is not a disinformation agent is anybody's guess. The suspicion surrounding Jones is due to his loud, and occasionally blowhard nature. His almost fake crying, similar to glen beck, does not garner for him any believability points. But, compared to the treasonous pop-media, he does provide excellent guests like: Tarpley, Celente, Keiser, and Shiff.
however at the end of the day what is the result of these "refreshing" voices? For example does Celente help people become more than hoarders of gold? How does that help the overall society. Where is nobility?
@paulagloria Come on! don't expect Celente or others to help you with every aspect of your life! Everyone has an expertise in one thing or another. Don't expect him to be your savior!! It's not like believing that "Obama is a messiah and will save us all!!" Why do you Americans expect the TV characters and political leaders to help you with everything! Use your own head stupid!
@msquestionmark I don't know what you are talking about...I am not a fan of Celente and if you look over my feedback with Webster interviews they are usually complains that I interrupt (in order to question and better understand) so please clarify and I will respond.
Jones is NOT suspect. He's goofy but he means well. He's gotton a lot better over the years with Tarpley's help. He recognized Tarpley's insight especially when he talks about taking and breaking the false flag tool in front of the oligarchs' faces.
One should always uses a reasonably critical mind when it is warranted, regardless of the source. In the case of Trapley, the claimed made by a few knuckle daggers posting here like: "where is your proof" is embarrassingly ignorant. History is not about "proofs." It can also be argued it isn't even about truth. It is about a reconstruction of the past.
Also, the dolt who claims that peak oil is not manipulated is living in a capitalist utopia.
Now, I'm a huge fan of Webster Tarpley, but sitting there in a short-sleeve shirt, on the edge of his seat checking the pad notes he looks more like a retail grocery sales representative than a brilliant intellectual. Lol.
He didn't touch on any of the undeniable evidence that makes peak oil a real crisis. He just linked people with other people through assumptions and says that proves peak oil is a fraud. Tarpley and Alex Jones are disinformation artists. Give me some real evidence to debunk the fact of peak oil or don't make dumbass videos.
Just another group of silly people excersising themselves in wishful thinking. This is the exact cause why we are all doomed - because of simpletons who keep prattling "it can't happen to us", until it's too late.
Unfortunately for you, Mr. Fatman, peak oil is a proven geological fact.
I've been to the peak oil conferences, listened to Richard Heinberg and it is very compelling- i mean, I used to be a "believer". but I now think we have to allow for the real possibility that there is a huge amount of manipulation going on in the peak-oil movement and the oil markets. There is more driving the price than just supply and demand and there is more going on politically than just greedy, incompetent politicians & business interests trying to make a buck.
Webster Tarpley is amazing. i just love listening to him. The man is a fountain of knowledge. I wonder if he is a Christian. As for Paula Gloria thank you so much for posting these videos but every time you speak I cringe.
there is not much I can say about you cringing...not enough info....I did more than post these....I went down to DC arranged for the equipment, conducted the interviews and then uploaded and edited them
HAve you ever wondered why it is so hard to get this info? Have you ever wondered why it is ever harder to challenge it or develop it?
-Paula Gloria
(in my dad's account as mine was disabled 4 posting "Joe Friendly and Carl Person Want Dope to be Legal" about the cancer healing benefits of hemp)
if you are serious about advancing a concept you are not making yourself clear except to imply that you know and understand what others don't.
Considering the state of ignorance in the world why side with that ignorance if your sharing could help? It is a thousand times easier to complain about a creation than to participate in creating and taking responsibility for it. This to me is the real power of what is built up through YouTube comments.
crossroad, you're an idiot! i'm not going to qaulify my statement because you're that much of a fucking idiot you wouldnt understand what i was saying.
Around 19 minutes into this video, Webster Tarpley mentions an empirical survey done by Daniel Yergin (@19:35). That survey was done for the "oil cartel" and apparently concludes that theres plenty of oil left and that Peak Oil is just a fraud. Then, toward the end of the video (@27:10), Tarpley says that Peak Oil is all a fraud created BY the "oil cartel". Tarpley actually managed to contradict himself in a 20 minute video, proving that he doesnt know what hes talking about.
some believe that the universe is limited and others believe it is unlimited...some believe that what you put your attention on grows and others believe they are victims of circumstance..oddly enough those that believe there is probably no God are the biggest complainers to...who, then if they are not responsible for their own actions are they complaining to? their "superiors"?
I wanted to listen to this guy - but he is just nasty - he wont let her ask questions or speak. I found it very hard to deal with his overbearing manner.
yeah, he does have a bad tendency to run off at the mouth and no one gets a serious word in edgewise. like he cant stop talking or he'll lose his train of thought lol
tarpley is right on with the dollar, but he is clueless to energy. this is an older video though. #1 and #2 oil producers have peaked. saudi arabia and russia. its real and its happening, manipulated or not. Its time to start learning to be self-reliant and to live outside the system. build community and grow your own food. check out permaculture and if you still want transportation, the air car is a good technology. more info on my blog - infopatriots(dot)org
get the book "gaia's garden - a guide to home-scale permaculture
for ready to ship transportation now, ride a bike, walk. learn to grow food while we wait for replacement vehicles. you could get a zap car or truck which are electric but the batteries are not sustainable
I read your comment, not only your a dangerously ignorant about everything, but your take your fantasy for truth, you should better do your research before inviting speaker that believe in "abiotic theory" : just a fraud invented by the soviet no more no less. But it seems that you like "fraud"
good luck, and look at the gas station numbers if you don't believe in peak oil you can always complain about "the conspiracy of the big oil" if it makes you feel better, go for it.
Ha Ok, because the alternatives are on Youtube necessarily imply that they are true...just like the words of Tarpley right? anyway the fact that you shift on the "alternative to oil" exist on youtube tells me that you start to feel by yourself that this "peak oil is a fraud" becomes shaky. Msr Tarpley might be an erudit on geopolitics but he is an ignorant in matter of energy and geology and should better informs himself before asserting that peak oil is wrong and abiotic theory is right.
it is the scarcity of iol that determines our economy...our economy buys into scarcity...without the notion of scarcity it doesn't function.....even an illusion of scarcity allows a high price that then covers up many other things....youtube is about transparency and not hiding coming forth into the light and sharing with all the most precious think to share is knowledge
I reject ur notion of limiting nature. we r products of nature able to infinitely express ourselves into joy and abundance
That's a new economic theory that I was not aware of, despite being quite well informed in general. Anyway , you say that you reject my notion of "limiting nature" but I haven't said anything about that so far. It is not because I brought up the fact that "peak oil is a proven fact and abiotic theory has proven to be wrong" that I support the notion of limiting nature in general. though there is limits to nature like there is limit to everything, only the reckless human nature is limitless
in your "conspiracy theory" frenesy you say "our economy doesn't function without the notion of scarcity" at 5$ a gallon oil is still cheaper than mineral water despite that you have to drill it in alasaka carry it over thousands of miles, refining it. A gallon of gas can propel your car at 60MPH over 30Miles, try to shover your car over that distance, ok? you americans are absolute inconcients about your wasteful lifestyle and the disastrous political and ecological consequences of it
"we r products of nature able to infinitely express ourselves into joy and abundance"
oh yes : polluting, dumping our trash everywhere, wreking the climate, annihilating the rain forest and the coral reefs, making other species extinct at an unprecedented pace.
but sure we all have wings in our back and a halo above our head...god bless america.
Your ingenuousness is rather laughable than really to be taken seriously
I do not believe that nature came from God but the other way around.....I hve a deeper reverence for nature than you do.....I bleieve in abundance and love of nature and act accordingly...your position leads to eugenics..the culling of the race according to puny understandings of how nature work.
I believe what you put your attention on grows...if you want to look at nature's cruelty (a lion eats a lamb) it is there but there is all kinds of evidence that there is abundance
which includes forgiveness and kindness to each other and to ourselves as very much belonging in nature's grand scheme of things. I believe in love and gratitude. These grow too according to attention
wether God created nature or nature created god is futile discussion for me since I am sraight atheist.
what you mean by "the evidence of abundance". if you look at living organisms wether they are plants or animals, the evolution has really tuned them for scarcity (fishes don't regulate their appetite cause food is extremely scarce in the marine environment) each specy is always on the verge of survival because of the scarcity of resources in nature, your theory sounds shaky again.
abundance or scarcity depends on your perspective. the fact that we have life and food is proof of abundance. however if we don't move towards a sustainable system, we will move into scarcity as our abundant energy enters into decline and/or we pollute our planet past its carrying capacity.
I understand that "peak Oil" is quite a disturing problem, especially in america where the whole system is based on cheap oil. Unfortunately the fact that oil production peaked in US in 1973 is a fact, wether we like it or not. Not only oil production peaked US in 1973, but it kept decreasing during 35 years despite use of modern enhanced recovery technics. Your guest is easy with words but he is short of any serious data about geology. what we hear here is justdenial.
my audience isn't for those who play music and listen. I don't mean to be rude but how much did you pay to listen to this? Those who donate to what I am trying to do have helped me since this time to make my work better. The global warming and peak oil fraud will cause great damage and even lend itself to the justification for fewer people whch always means endless war
my turn. I'm sorry. I don't care for global warming or peak oil. I always like to educate myself on all topics. I need data not belief systems. One thing your opponents have against you is no one is marketing for peak oil and global warming. Peak oil is not in mainstream media and global warming is in mainstream media. Your thesis is very marketable. You should have no problem playing the game to get the money.
by "make my work better" I meant getting equiptment to work better, getting better equiptment and so on....TV is costly..ppl have turned down their music when it was something that interested them...I don't think you are open to a premise other than your own which is why I always say what you believe today may not be what you believed yesterday or may not be what you belief tomorrow.... more info instead of labels, compliments as well as insults don't really advance a better understanding
Your kind of cute. I was looking for that word {premise} but because I could'nt spell it correctly so I went with {thesis} Which totally changed my premise. And yes you are a real person and forgive my inconcideretness twords you this morning.
Exponential growth is exponential growth. Saying that it might "slow down" doesn't mean it stops being exponential growth. If you don't understand this concept, then you have no right to say anything on this topic.
A savings account with 4% interest has exponential growth, and so does one with 1% interest. Linear growth will add some number over a certain amount of time. Exponential growth will double over a period of time. This is totally different.
The peak production in the US was not the only peak. Every oil field peaks in the same sort of bell curve shape. All of these add up to one big peak. There is no other curve shape that could possibly fit. Discoveries also peaked well before the US production peak, which makes sense because if you don't discover more fields, the fields we have are just going to run out.
Besides, how can there NOT be a peak. We can't get more oil out of the ground than there is.
Nobody is surpressing CF. CF is a lie. Don't even bring CF up because I will rip you to peices on that.
"The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings."
Unfortunately you and I don't have to believe in peak oil for it to bite us in the ass. The problem is there are men of the greatest power who do believe it, and they are going to war because of it and dragging our economy along with it. I am writing a book about it currently. Not a scholarly research book, but a how to survive guide, that's my area of expertise. Of course a lot of research has to be done for it anyway. Still keep smiling. Investigate 9/11.
Okay, but I still vote for austerity because it is still more sustainable for the earth and all the animals and plants other than ourselves. The more oil we pull out for our usage, the more pollution, the more extinctions follow. We are in a period of great extinction right now. The earth records only 5 major periods before this.
I don't believe in Peak Oil, or global warming. Like you, that doesn't mean that I support consumer culture and wasteful and unnecessary behaviour. The ultimate "solution" is reduction of human populations.
hi. you're right. so: 1. peak oil isn't necessarily inconsistent with the non-biotic theory, and 2. peak oil doesn't have to be interpreted as malthusian . anyhow, i think i regret posting the comments, and so i'd really appreciate it if you could remove them (inc. this one). thanks. - interesting video, good post, debate needed, thanks.
do you know WarzSchoolchild? he sent me some info privately that I will look into....yes we must stay connected on this topic of great concern to economic well being to many many
Webster's theory that many past civilizations died by oligarchy is supported by the record of history. The greatest gift we can give our children is a good education, so that they can see through the smoke and mirror tricks of the current oligarchs. The internet can assist this objective if the content is not subverted.
Thanx Paula, I am very fortunate to have a wonderful Boss. Head of H.M.'s Household Scotland. Merlin Hay(Earl of Erroll)and myself have been very strong supporters of the Internet since it's inception. BTW we had advance info on 9/11. Also BTW. I am his Chaplain(Royal Military Police)
You're completely right. In 100 years there will be 10 trillion on the planet and we will all have SUVs and 50,000sq ft homes. The planet isn't finite, what 'kook' would believe that?
@John201nz: I have a deep and abiding faith in the workings of nature and not man's machinations...I do not believe in population control nor that man is a problem on this planet...only grossly ignorant. but he must learn to ask the right questions before the right answers come
What I meant is that the guy in this video is grossly misinformed. He contradicts himself numerous times and doesn't seem to actually understand the issue.
do you believe that on Mars (which is also showing signs of warming) they are driving SUV's I think man made global warming is a ridiculous theory and when I contact the main source of scholarship at the Byrd Polar Research center they keep passing the buck up to Lonnie Thompson himself when I ask for a representative to come and sit on a panel at a distinguished location and to video tape it
I did a thesis in my last year of high school on Peak Oil. From what I can see, the thesis depends on the info (ie. reserves, discoveries) coming from the oil companies and government agencies. So, the thesis depends on whether or not these companies are telling us the truth.
Furthermore, there is still the question of whether oil is a fossil fuel or not. If it is, it makes great sense that it is finite and will run out. But, if oil is abiotic the whole situation changes. The problem with the abiotic theory is that it is very obscure and unknown, whereas fossil fuels are the commonly accepted science.
Webster says that the Soviets are very scientific, but, correct me if I'm wrong, didn't the Soviets believe they could control what plants grew from seeds and thus screwed up their agriculture system?
True, so we shouldn't trust the Russian abiotic theory simply for the fact that they have a "serious scientific tradition". Logic and reason should always be our guide.
@kulza23 ahh-h yes but to my knowledge the fossil theory was just sort of "put out there" by British at the turn of the century before last. Was NAY scientific work done on that theory? great to have your comments...thx for the connection
"If the "oilgopoly" has such a control over the world oil...why bother making a peak oil myth...?"
What was clear from this interview is since the decline of the "petro dollar", the fiat dollar has been harder to keep in check, or propped up to keep others in check. A myth could easily serve to raise the price per barrel in correlation with the declining petro dollar hegemony and resulting hyper-inflation and other fallout resulting from a floundering fiat dollar.
There will be always oil on earth. The point is, with India, china, USA, there will be not enough cheap and abondant oil for everyone, based on a Techno society consuming more and more energy. These people are insane or ignorant or inconcious. Already millions are suffering, soldiers are dying because of oil problem. Happy 4th of july, at least you have a roof and bread to eat, but no more mind to enjoy it. That what it's called decadence.
If the "oilgopoly" has such a control over the world oil quanities, why would they even bother making a peak oil myth, if they can get away with price gauging anyway? Peak oil is not a myth. And the reason US producion in all industires peaked in the 1970s was BECASUSE OIL PEAKED peak oil is always a record breaking year more oil = better econmy
i believe it is because they hide behind irresponsible fiscal policies that ppl are encouraged to participate in. IF you believe that oil is necessary for the economy they secretly you are FOR the war feeling it is necessary to support your lifestyle. It fosters self-hatred which becomes debilitating and thus such a population is easier to control
Oil IS nessessary to support our lifestyle, you twit. Without it how would you run your car? How would we grow our food? There is nothing in our entire society that oil dosen't effect.
I am not for this war, I am for finding alternative fuels. I could just as easily say that you are acctually in secret a repersentive of the oil industry thats trying to hid the truth, and that would be just as cedible as what toy have said.
who is "toy" (besides a typo)? This is a very EMOTIONAL subject, isn't it? I don't care what ppl think about me..I have almost 300 vids that speak for themselves for those with the patience to sample them...check out the playlist on zero point energy. u will be amazed
People can't handle the truth. I know man made global warming is to a large extent a hoax. But the truth is we are trashing and raping this planet. The less humans on this planet the better. The elites are justified in their campaign of austerity, destitution, and killing. This is a truth that almost no one can admit to themselves much less dare say. This is the ugliest truth.
websterdamus! what do you know, 2006 and he was dead right! by the way,2006 seems like yesterday
shtfuk668 2 weeks ago
This video is a joke right? If you are looking for facts you will not find very many of them in this video.
MrPentatonicScale 3 weeks ago
@MrPentatonicScale I am up for correction...what disturbs you most about this video?
paulagloria 3 weeks ago
@paulagloria the simple fact that this gentleman doesn't present any knowledge of the physics involved with tapping an oil reservoir. And the one source he sites is Alex Jones?? Pardon me for being a little skeptical. Peak oil is not a fraud its a fact.
MrPentatonicScale 3 weeks ago
Do you lefties know that "M. King Hubbert" was never an actual person? They say his first name was Marion and he didn't like it, so he shortened it to M., but in fact, "he" was a woman named Marion C. Reynolds who was never even a geologist and worked for an early branch of what we know know as ACORN. The story after that gets complicated but you get the point.
Listen to Alex Jones and you'll educate yourselves on the TRUTH.
HorseCents 1 month ago
Global warming is a cover up for politicians to avoid talking about peak oil.
sangolt88 1 month ago
YOU CANT TELL THE WEBSTER U GOT 1 MIN!!!!
americanmambi 1 month ago
Your channel has 911 videos
psilocyberspaceman 3 months ago
I would say, just like there is no concrete evidence of Global warming, there is no concrete evidence of Peak oil as claimed by some people.
Of course, the amount of oil on our planet is finite. But we don't have and proven data that shows that Oil reserves will be exhausted in next 20-30 years.
Global warming fake science is in complete shambles and is falling apart. Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel laureate resigned from APS because he is fed up with Global Warming fear mongering.
kkbose 4 months ago
The peak oil theory is utterly concrete.It deals in factual quantities and rates.The issue is to get the true figure of production from suppliers which has/is difficult.
Peak oil doesn't lend itself readily to myth.The theory is dealing with actual figures
Hubbert predicted that US production would peak in the early 1970's and he was ridiculed.He turned out be correct. In Australia oil production has peaked. You just have to look at the figures.No.Myth does not sit well with the idea of peak oil
iankyoko 4 months ago
@iankyoko
Lol... the prodcutiion peaker because they wanted the price artifically high so the rest of the world would need to buy more dollars in oil.. Not saying that peak oil isn't real but the 70s lowering of production was predistable.
xMaXiMuSx 2 months ago
Tarpley is correct. (even if oil is running out), it still political.
yourmajezty 4 months ago
The prediction of the peak has come and gone many times now. This is evidence that the model is flawed. Easy access to these resources are certainly limited, but the hysteric hand waving by the peak oil proponents only proves that this is politics and not science. The same thing goes for the Warmists and their failed model.
Yes, the basic premise has validity, but the introduction of ideology and politics taints the science. My argument is with Malthus.
AntiFed1791 5 months ago
I'm 5 mins in and i could tear him apart on nearly everything he's said. This is absolute nonsense, and i think it should be deleted from YT as Peak Oil is now a reality and more and more people are educating themselves on it. They dont need to hear this outdated rubbish.
Chris Martenson says it best. Economists have no words for decline, they simply call it negative growth.
These people will be wrestling with numbers right into another dark age if we dont get our voices heard above them.
moonsugar1 6 months ago
@moonsugar1 what do you think about global warming? or radiation hormesis?
paulagloria 6 months ago
@paulagloria I think neither are as pressing an issue! Lol.
Radiation Hormesis I've heard of but have not looked at in any kind of detail. Isnt it the debate as to the positive or negative effects of radiation exposure? I'll have a quick peek into it in a mo if i get the chance. I'm open to debate, (as always!) if it is relevant in to the pending Energy Crisis.
Global warming is accepted amongst the wider scientific community and I agree with its thesis.
moonsugar1 6 months ago
@moonsugar1 I do not agree with the "science" behind global warming....I had invited the people at the Byrd Polar research center to be part of a round table discussion and every person passed the buk right up to Ronnie Thompson. Almost a billion $ has gone into computer models while water vapor and sun flares or sun anything is never considered. The panel at the UN behind this is not our friend.
paulagloria 6 months ago 3
Comment removed
oldspammer 5 months ago
@moonsugar1 In 2009 prior to the climate gate controversy 97% of active climate scientists supported AGW theory, but in 2010 a larger survey of climate scientists, post-climate gate, had 34.7% support of AGW. The difference in the numbers was not just from climate gate, but from the survey methods.
oldspammer 5 months ago
@moonsugar1 2009 97% number comes from selecting fewer than 80 anonymous scientific papers.
Funding is selective based on the intent of a given study. Peer review process where all papers were reviewed by the AGW scientific minority shall taint the outcome.
When world money powers insist upon taxing carbon rather than replanting deforested rainforest lands or reclaiming lands subjected to desertification due to fresh water aquifer depletion by tycoon companies, scientists sell out for funding.
oldspammer 5 months ago
@moonsugar1 Weather mod tech has existed predating the NSDM 165 Nixon memo. Hockey stick graph measures extreme anomalies with wide error bars, then data is smoothed & the scale is zoomed in by a very large factor that exceeds the error limits of original data.
Skeptics argued that chemtrails were just a conspiracy theory, but now government documents discuss the topic. Chemtrails, weather modification, & deforestation are all under globalist control affect climate.
Carbon taxes are BS.
oldspammer 5 months ago
@moonsugar1 Carbon tax / credit trading system is BS because the entire system is under globalist tycoon control that caused the fake problem in the first place.
Working poor, middle, & lower classes do not have any choice except for products available on store shelves.
Big globalists control what policies are regarding their factories whether to pollute or to displace manufacturing jobs to other countries or to deforest the Amazon & Mexico & Africa & can vote themselves pay raises & bonuses.
oldspammer 5 months ago
@paulagloria Oh and perhaps my request for the video to be deleted was a little forward, we all have a right to voice our beliefs ;)
moonsugar1 6 months ago
@moonsugar1 If you can tear it to pieces in 5 mins, then do it here for the knowledge-seekers to read and evaluate. I find Webster Tarpley and his analysis to be very enlightening and fruitful when I investigate it further. I fancy his skill with the English language quite a bit too. That being said, I have been hoodwinked more times than I would care to admit, and I am very open to well-stated criticisms that I can investigate the validity of. I warn you though, I am quite in Tarpley's camp.
jkerri16 5 months ago
@jkerri16 I havent got 5 mins right now buddy! lol, got places to be. I'll have to watch the video through again as its been a while since i watched it, and I'll try and get back to you soon. All I would say quickly is that alot has happened since 2006 when this video was uploaded and the actions of oil companies since, as well as international independant bodies, suggests purely in their actions that peak oil is very much a reality. Must dash, speak soon ;)
moonsugar1 5 months ago
@moonsugar1 "i think it should be deleted from YT"
Thank you for revealing your true colors. That you would so quickly call for censorship of a view with which you disagree shows you to be someone with no regard for free speech and an explicit fear of an open debate.
GenSButler 3 months ago
@moonsugar1 definatly you have your right to your opinion, this man has a right to present his facts.
circusboy90210 1 month ago
This dude aligns himself with Alex Jones.
So, first he says there's no geologic evidence of oil depletion and then he sites Alex Jones. I now have two very good reasons to not believe a word he says.
bobbygnosis 6 months ago
@bobbygnosis how do you deal with the global warming "science"?
paulagloria 6 months ago
@paulagloria Food > heat wave
Global warming proponents still buy food from Ralph's / Trader Joe's / Whole Foods / WallMart / et cetera. Which depends on oil. If you want to dramatically reduce oil dependence then grow your own food. It's healthier and you don't support two protracted wars.
I side-step the science only because if you wish to believe something no one can convince you to not believe it other than you. I don't really care if people believe in it or not. They'll starve regardless.
bobbygnosis 6 months ago
@bobbygnosis yes webster is great on libya etc but here he shows total ignorance ABIOTIC OIL wow thats super dumb
TheJUNGLESURFER 6 months ago
@TheJUNGLESURFER What's your proof oil does not originate from primordial sources & Col. Prouty is wrong?
Young children are indoctrinated by the deliberately dumbed down education system. As soon as you realize that some of its teachings are utter nonsense, you will see that it is on purpose to protect its tycoon designers whose think tank groups formulated education policies starting in the 1800s.
If a tycoon can get you to buy his stuff at higher prices, he makes more money from your labor.
oldspammer 5 months ago
@bobbygnosis You meant to say cites Alex Jones.
Don't believe anyone--think for yourself--check / verify if anyone independently says that other oil reserves exist, yet are untapped.
By Google video searching (energy non-chrisis) a preacher named Lindsey Williams outlines his eye witness accounts of vast quantities of oil found in Alaska that are untapped.
Williams explains in other videos that the monetary system / Wall Street is kept afloat by an investment pact with the Saudi Arabian Arabs.
oldspammer 5 months ago
@oldspammer You're preaching to the chior.
bobbygnosis 5 months ago
Identify, track down, list down all speculative non-productive worthless toxic debts, & identify their creators. Then outright cut them out of the financial sectors, put the country on bankruptcy reorganization to seperate illegal & legal debts & re-negotiate the deal with all legal debts and cut out illegal debts from the economy by legally writing them off for they are virtually speculatively worthless. Remove & criminalize central banking, use Hamiltonian banking principles of debt-free cedit
darthvader5300 8 months ago
@darthvader5300 Something Strange Is Starting To Make Sense; The CUSIP
/watch?v=liIwP-mwmTU
paulagloria 8 months ago
Webster has his head up his ass. All these things have little if anything to do with Peak Oil.
He has the rationale of Lyndon Larouche.
MsZeitgeist85 8 months ago
The Y2K - peak oil comparison is bogus and stupid.
Peak Oil is an observation and occurs in every oil field sooner or later. Fields are finite not infinite. As more wells are drilled and pumps added (field pressure drops) there is a peak in the extraction rate of oil. At some point it becomes uneconomic to add pumps. The peak is the maximum extraction rate. That is peak oil. It is that simple. It happens in every oil field, region, nation, and has probably already happened globally.
Knossos22 8 months ago
cunt bitch. eat that pig dick and shut the fuck up
yourmajezty 10 months ago
@harrymook are you familiar with radiation hormesis? that low level radioactive stones are like vitamins to us? We need radiation.
On your other points of energy: what do you think is the solution, including economic implementation.
paulagloria 10 months ago
@harrymook so you are pro or anti nuclear energy? ..I agree there is huge misunderstanding about nuclear energy "I have ultra-low-cost solar panels costing $0.04 per peak watt to make H2 for $100/MT.
harrymook 2 hours ago "
paulagloria 10 months ago
@harrymook But we cant make paints, tooth paste, plastic, nylon, gum and other things with solar and wind energy. The problem with oil is that you find it even in your computer. Replace it is going to cost us a huge effort, if we can.
MGGoblin 10 months ago
@MGGoblin
Once you have a source of carbon (any, like plants) you can use pressure and heat to convert it to synthetic crude. Yes its inefficient, but it can be done if you have enough energy of any form.
52111centrumcz 6 months ago
@52111centrumcz ¿Really? Interesting! =)
MGGoblin 6 months ago
@harrymook do you like low cost nuclear?
paulagloria 11 months ago
@paulagloria ¿May I ask you a cuestion? In minute 18:12, Webster says that russian science is based on a guy that acording to him is the greatest mind of the last 300 hundred years. Well, I couldn't hear the name, ¿what's his name? Thanks. (Sorry for my bad english, I'm from Argentina)
MGGoblin 10 months ago
quite old but still relevant
CHRIS1974100 11 months ago
@neoconretard LOL, most geologists I have personally met with say Peak Oil is a myth. Lots of oil in Alaska, more in fact than in all of Saudi Arabia. Peak Oil is merely wishful leftist thinking and they are wrong.
RepublicConstitution 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've got an idea: All you guys who believe in abiotic oil should all get together and start your own oil company. You'll save the world from energy shortages and become the richest people in on Earth! ...or maybe you'll just find out it's a bullshit theory.
yarco8000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've got an idea: All you guys who believe in abiotic oil should all get together and start your own oil company. You'll save the world from energy shortages and become the richest people in on Earth! ...or maybe you'll just find out it's a bullshit theory.
yarco8000 1 year ago
happy canada day
THEWWEBOSSMAN 1 year ago
@THEWWEBOSSMAN why do you say "canada" day?
paulagloria 1 year ago
@paulagloria Cuz i am canadian
THEWWEBOSSMAN 1 year ago
@paulagoblin
Canada Day, its a national holiday
Do you know what a "national holiday" is?
sansez 1 year ago
@THEWWEBOSSMAN ain'ts they
SeeProfileForDetails 1 year ago
hahaha the uk celebrates getting their asses kicked
W1ndir 1 year ago
wow this guy is talking about issues we have today. he even touched on single payer
marpoq 1 year ago
Now i know why people are forced to pay more $ for gas than ever before.Thank you.
4LOSTSOULSONLY 1 year ago
While your guest can spout a lot of information he clearly is not well versed in understanding the bigger picture of peak oil which is a well understood problem even within the oil industry itself. Even Mr. Tarpley briefly admits that it is likely that there will be a peak, but brushes it aside. Knowing that we WILL peak, regardless of the date, we should be eager to face and address the problem rather than deny its reality.
cupojoeg 1 year ago
Why is she holding a hot dog?
imthemac420 2 years ago
it is an American tradition to eat hot dogs on the 4th of July
paulagloria 2 years ago
GLUTTONY: just another thing the good ol US of EH has outsourced . . .
Born in Nagano, Japan, Kobayashi set his first record at his rookie appearance on July 4, 2001, when he ate 50 hot dogs in 12 minutes at the Nathan's Coney Island hot dog-eating contest, doubling the previous record of 25.
MrXenomorphosis 2 years ago
Lol oh yeah I forgot thats when this interview was conducted.... Great vid btw
imthemac420 2 years ago
Webster Tarpley is an all time great.
Tarpley>>Zinn>>Chumpsky
CraigKramer 2 years ago
long live webster tarpley!
mystikast 2 years ago
NEW truth - just out!
Global Warming -
SEE "Lord Christopher Monckton: From Global Warming to Global Governance"
A MUST see . . .
SEE "Lord Christopher Monckton: From Global Warming to Global Governance"
This has become a lot worse than we ever thought it could, and "Lord Christopher Monckton: From Global Warming to Global Governance" shows us why.
NEW truth - just out!
Global Warming - SEE "Lord Christopher Monckton: From Global Warming to Global Governance"
A MUST see . . .
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
thanks for the tip off...have you seen my work with the Internet Skeptic (Bob Wagner)?
paulagloria 2 years ago
I discovered "Transition Towns" several weeks ago. There was an action in a town nearby in the Netherlands.
I saw their propaganda for "The Age of Stupid".
I discovered "Transition Towns" everywhere make propaganda for PEAK OIL and GLOBAL WARMING.
When I reacted on their website about the Global Warming HOAX, I was removed / banned.
jackp6 2 years ago
Just to be clear I am referring to Alex Jones.
In my objective opinion, Jones is suspect. Whether he is or is not a disinformation agent is anybody's guess. The suspicion surrounding Jones is due to his loud, and occasionally blowhard nature. His almost fake crying, similar to glen beck, does not garner for him any believability points. But, compared to the treasonous pop-media, he does provide excellent guests like: Tarpley, Celente, Keiser, and Shiff.
biped19 2 years ago
however at the end of the day what is the result of these "refreshing" voices? For example does Celente help people become more than hoarders of gold? How does that help the overall society. Where is nobility?
paulagloria 2 years ago
@paulagloria Come on! don't expect Celente or others to help you with every aspect of your life! Everyone has an expertise in one thing or another. Don't expect him to be your savior!! It's not like believing that "Obama is a messiah and will save us all!!" Why do you Americans expect the TV characters and political leaders to help you with everything! Use your own head stupid!
msquestionmark 1 year ago
@msquestionmark I don't know what you are talking about...I am not a fan of Celente and if you look over my feedback with Webster interviews they are usually complains that I interrupt (in order to question and better understand) so please clarify and I will respond.
paulagloria 1 year ago
Jones is NOT suspect. He's goofy but he means well. He's gotton a lot better over the years with Tarpley's help. He recognized Tarpley's insight especially when he talks about taking and breaking the false flag tool in front of the oligarchs' faces.
gosciu555 2 years ago
One should always uses a reasonably critical mind when it is warranted, regardless of the source. In the case of Trapley, the claimed made by a few knuckle daggers posting here like: "where is your proof" is embarrassingly ignorant. History is not about "proofs." It can also be argued it isn't even about truth. It is about a reconstruction of the past.
Also, the dolt who claims that peak oil is not manipulated is living in a capitalist utopia.
Jones is a different matter.
biped19 2 years ago
tell me about Jones
paulagloria 2 years ago
Comment removed
biped19 2 years ago
Now, I'm a huge fan of Webster Tarpley, but sitting there in a short-sleeve shirt, on the edge of his seat checking the pad notes he looks more like a retail grocery sales representative than a brilliant intellectual. Lol.
Jespax 2 years ago
He didn't touch on any of the undeniable evidence that makes peak oil a real crisis. He just linked people with other people through assumptions and says that proves peak oil is a fraud. Tarpley and Alex Jones are disinformation artists. Give me some real evidence to debunk the fact of peak oil or don't make dumbass videos.
THEGlassIED 2 years ago
I like how it was 30 mins of him prattling on about his oh-so valid opinion, of which it was solely of, and 0 seconds of actual proof.
harlexWTF 2 years ago
Webster Tarpley for President, this is one very smart person! Obviously he is a voracious reader, what a great American!
jdfarr45 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
The United States is a child-molester of smaller nations.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
I want to drown in a pool of my own blood and feces.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
thanks for sharing
rabbitholecentral 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Say, could I trouble you for a cup of feces, good chap?
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Just another group of silly people excersising themselves in wishful thinking. This is the exact cause why we are all doomed - because of simpletons who keep prattling "it can't happen to us", until it's too late.
Unfortunately for you, Mr. Fatman, peak oil is a proven geological fact.
Kamamuracz 2 years ago
I've been to the peak oil conferences, listened to Richard Heinberg and it is very compelling- i mean, I used to be a "believer". but I now think we have to allow for the real possibility that there is a huge amount of manipulation going on in the peak-oil movement and the oil markets. There is more driving the price than just supply and demand and there is more going on politically than just greedy, incompetent politicians & business interests trying to make a buck.
jacksoncarreras 2 years ago
Webster Tarpley is amazing. i just love listening to him. The man is a fountain of knowledge. I wonder if he is a Christian. As for Paula Gloria thank you so much for posting these videos but every time you speak I cringe.
0Ellie25 2 years ago
there is not much I can say about you cringing...not enough info....I did more than post these....I went down to DC arranged for the equipment, conducted the interviews and then uploaded and edited them
HAve you ever wondered why it is so hard to get this info? Have you ever wondered why it is ever harder to challenge it or develop it?
-Paula Gloria
(in my dad's account as mine was disabled 4 posting "Joe Friendly and Carl Person Want Dope to be Legal" about the cancer healing benefits of hemp)
mrcon5 2 years ago
IS that a hot dog bun in her hand?
fenderfunk 2 years ago
yep...it was my forth of july holiday picnic
-Paula Gloria
rabbitholecentral 2 years ago
exactly India calling again
ice9001 2 years ago
if you are serious about advancing a concept you are not making yourself clear except to imply that you know and understand what others don't.
Considering the state of ignorance in the world why side with that ignorance if your sharing could help? It is a thousand times easier to complain about a creation than to participate in creating and taking responsibility for it. This to me is the real power of what is built up through YouTube comments.
Therefore what do you think about Peak Oil?
paulagloria 2 years ago
She is not getting this lol int aint sinking in she aint that bright but Tarply makes some good points .
ice9001 2 years ago
"lol int aint sinking in"
what does that mean?
paulagloria 2 years ago
less oil means higher price. :) higher price means more money for producers. :)
unworldlything 3 years ago
in capitalism, scarce means money... :)
unworldlything 3 years ago
how could you make more money by overstating the reserve? :)
unworldlything 3 years ago
Oil is abiotic, it comes from the Earth's core. Oil and coal can be found on other planets, so they are not fossil fuels.
He101A 3 years ago
crossroad, you're an idiot! i'm not going to qaulify my statement because you're that much of a fucking idiot you wouldnt understand what i was saying.
freedomfight2012 3 years ago
what do you call an person who writes to an idiot.....
paulagloria 3 years ago
Around 19 minutes into this video, Webster Tarpley mentions an empirical survey done by Daniel Yergin (@19:35). That survey was done for the "oil cartel" and apparently concludes that theres plenty of oil left and that Peak Oil is just a fraud. Then, toward the end of the video (@27:10), Tarpley says that Peak Oil is all a fraud created BY the "oil cartel". Tarpley actually managed to contradict himself in a 20 minute video, proving that he doesnt know what hes talking about.
OperationCrossroad 3 years ago 2
with non mass based energy all this is irrelevant. Have you heard of Nikolas Tesla?
paulagloria 3 years ago
This is way off. High prices because of glut? Oil is infinite resource? Bullshit.
ibphotos 3 years ago
some believe that the universe is limited and others believe it is unlimited...some believe that what you put your attention on grows and others believe they are victims of circumstance..oddly enough those that believe there is probably no God are the biggest complainers to...who, then if they are not responsible for their own actions are they complaining to? their "superiors"?
paulagloria 3 years ago
I wanted to listen to this guy - but he is just nasty - he wont let her ask questions or speak. I found it very hard to deal with his overbearing manner.
Hamish121212 3 years ago
yeah, he does have a bad tendency to run off at the mouth and no one gets a serious word in edgewise. like he cant stop talking or he'll lose his train of thought lol
julezmotif 3 years ago
tarpley is right on with the dollar, but he is clueless to energy. this is an older video though. #1 and #2 oil producers have peaked. saudi arabia and russia. its real and its happening, manipulated or not. Its time to start learning to be self-reliant and to live outside the system. build community and grow your own food. check out permaculture and if you still want transportation, the air car is a good technology. more info on my blog - infopatriots(dot)org
zstowasser 3 years ago
do you know the best products "ready to ship"
paulagloria 3 years ago
get the book "gaia's garden - a guide to home-scale permaculture
for ready to ship transportation now, ride a bike, walk. learn to grow food while we wait for replacement vehicles. you could get a zap car or truck which are electric but the batteries are not sustainable
zstowasser 3 years ago
I love perma-culture but check this out:
video.google com/videoplay?docid=6562030534380820378
paulagloria 3 years ago
be sure to put a "." between the google and com and tell me what you think!
paulagloria 3 years ago
OK Paula,
I read your comment, not only your a dangerously ignorant about everything, but your take your fantasy for truth, you should better do your research before inviting speaker that believe in "abiotic theory" : just a fraud invented by the soviet no more no less. But it seems that you like "fraud"
good luck, and look at the gas station numbers if you don't believe in peak oil you can always complain about "the conspiracy of the big oil" if it makes you feel better, go for it.
dou40006 3 years ago
there are enough alternative energy cars and devices all over youtube you could choke a horse....do YOUR research
paulagloria 3 years ago
Ha Ok, because the alternatives are on Youtube necessarily imply that they are true...just like the words of Tarpley right? anyway the fact that you shift on the "alternative to oil" exist on youtube tells me that you start to feel by yourself that this "peak oil is a fraud" becomes shaky. Msr Tarpley might be an erudit on geopolitics but he is an ignorant in matter of energy and geology and should better informs himself before asserting that peak oil is wrong and abiotic theory is right.
dou40006 3 years ago
it is the scarcity of iol that determines our economy...our economy buys into scarcity...without the notion of scarcity it doesn't function.....even an illusion of scarcity allows a high price that then covers up many other things....youtube is about transparency and not hiding coming forth into the light and sharing with all the most precious think to share is knowledge
I reject ur notion of limiting nature. we r products of nature able to infinitely express ourselves into joy and abundance
paulagloria 3 years ago
That's a new economic theory that I was not aware of, despite being quite well informed in general. Anyway , you say that you reject my notion of "limiting nature" but I haven't said anything about that so far. It is not because I brought up the fact that "peak oil is a proven fact and abiotic theory has proven to be wrong" that I support the notion of limiting nature in general. though there is limits to nature like there is limit to everything, only the reckless human nature is limitless
dou40006 3 years ago
in your "conspiracy theory" frenesy you say "our economy doesn't function without the notion of scarcity" at 5$ a gallon oil is still cheaper than mineral water despite that you have to drill it in alasaka carry it over thousands of miles, refining it. A gallon of gas can propel your car at 60MPH over 30Miles, try to shover your car over that distance, ok? you americans are absolute inconcients about your wasteful lifestyle and the disastrous political and ecological consequences of it
dou40006 3 years ago
"we r products of nature able to infinitely express ourselves into joy and abundance"
oh yes : polluting, dumping our trash everywhere, wreking the climate, annihilating the rain forest and the coral reefs, making other species extinct at an unprecedented pace.
but sure we all have wings in our back and a halo above our head...god bless america.
Your ingenuousness is rather laughable than really to be taken seriously
dou40006 3 years ago
I do not believe that nature came from God but the other way around.....I hve a deeper reverence for nature than you do.....I bleieve in abundance and love of nature and act accordingly...your position leads to eugenics..the culling of the race according to puny understandings of how nature work.
I believe what you put your attention on grows...if you want to look at nature's cruelty (a lion eats a lamb) it is there but there is all kinds of evidence that there is abundance
paulagloria 3 years ago
which includes forgiveness and kindness to each other and to ourselves as very much belonging in nature's grand scheme of things. I believe in love and gratitude. These grow too according to attention
enjoy your life!
paulagloria 3 years ago
wether God created nature or nature created god is futile discussion for me since I am sraight atheist.
what you mean by "the evidence of abundance". if you look at living organisms wether they are plants or animals, the evolution has really tuned them for scarcity (fishes don't regulate their appetite cause food is extremely scarce in the marine environment) each specy is always on the verge of survival because of the scarcity of resources in nature, your theory sounds shaky again.
dou40006 3 years ago
abundance or scarcity depends on your perspective. the fact that we have life and food is proof of abundance. however if we don't move towards a sustainable system, we will move into scarcity as our abundant energy enters into decline and/or we pollute our planet past its carrying capacity.
zstowasser 3 years ago
Dear Paula
I understand that "peak Oil" is quite a disturing problem, especially in america where the whole system is based on cheap oil. Unfortunately the fact that oil production peaked in US in 1973 is a fact, wether we like it or not. Not only oil production peaked US in 1973, but it kept decreasing during 35 years despite use of modern enhanced recovery technics. Your guest is easy with words but he is short of any serious data about geology. what we hear here is justdenial.
dou40006 3 years ago
"How can you not "beleive" in peak oil? There can't be an infinite amount of oil from a finite sized planet"
Same way as you can pick a tree bare of apples and come back and do it again year after year.
perunatic 3 years ago
I'll make sure I steer clear of you post...
Mystery207 3 years ago
This guest seemed to have more insults than info. Why have him on? Slandering Malthus doesn't make you right.
ManicEightBall 3 years ago
Wow can't hear a thing she is saying...Don't want to turn down my Imusic for this. Use a better microphone please.
Mystery207 3 years ago
my audience isn't for those who play music and listen. I don't mean to be rude but how much did you pay to listen to this? Those who donate to what I am trying to do have helped me since this time to make my work better. The global warming and peak oil fraud will cause great damage and even lend itself to the justification for fewer people whch always means endless war
paulagloria 3 years ago
my turn. I'm sorry. I don't care for global warming or peak oil. I always like to educate myself on all topics. I need data not belief systems. One thing your opponents have against you is no one is marketing for peak oil and global warming. Peak oil is not in mainstream media and global warming is in mainstream media. Your thesis is very marketable. You should have no problem playing the game to get the money.
Mystery207 3 years ago
by "make my work better" I meant getting equiptment to work better, getting better equiptment and so on....TV is costly..ppl have turned down their music when it was something that interested them...I don't think you are open to a premise other than your own which is why I always say what you believe today may not be what you believed yesterday or may not be what you belief tomorrow.... more info instead of labels, compliments as well as insults don't really advance a better understanding
paulagloria 3 years ago
Your kind of cute. I was looking for that word {premise} but because I could'nt spell it correctly so I went with {thesis} Which totally changed my premise. And yes you are a real person and forgive my inconcideretness twords you this morning.
Mystery207 3 years ago
i miss you "Old PaulaGloria" Please come back to us...Hehehe
damouno 3 years ago
Exponential growth is exponential growth. Saying that it might "slow down" doesn't mean it stops being exponential growth. If you don't understand this concept, then you have no right to say anything on this topic.
A savings account with 4% interest has exponential growth, and so does one with 1% interest. Linear growth will add some number over a certain amount of time. Exponential growth will double over a period of time. This is totally different.
Has this guy seen a world population chart?
ManicEightBall 3 years ago
The peak production in the US was not the only peak. Every oil field peaks in the same sort of bell curve shape. All of these add up to one big peak. There is no other curve shape that could possibly fit. Discoveries also peaked well before the US production peak, which makes sense because if you don't discover more fields, the fields we have are just going to run out.
Besides, how can there NOT be a peak. We can't get more oil out of the ground than there is.
ManicEightBall 3 years ago
Wow, what a profound lack rational thinking.
bastionhead 3 years ago
Please answer this:
If Russia "believes" in abiotic theory. Why would they have any OIL imports?
Why would you import something that has infinite quantity?
People don't import dirt because everyones got it.
yogiudo 3 years ago
why would the 9/11 "Truth" movement have Steven Jones who supressed cold fusion 25 years ago.....there has never been a shortage in nature
paulagloria 3 years ago
Cold fusion is BS.
Nobody is surpressing CF. CF is a lie. Don't even bring CF up because I will rip you to peices on that.
"The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings."
The first law of thermodynamics.
yogiudo 3 years ago
Furthermore, the fact that you would bring up CF is a perfect sign that you don't get it at all.
It isn't a conspiracy. OIL is not infinite and CF is not going to save us.
It is just a plain and simple fact. Too many people using too much oil for too long and believe it or not, its almost gone.
yogiudo 3 years ago
Y2K was COMPLETELY different, and companies spent millions of dollars to FIX the problem.
And actually, many companies DID experience problems after Y2K.
Interesting video.
yogiudo 3 years ago
I am of the strong opinion that a lot of people made a lot of money over Y2K and it was to say the least "overhyped"
paulagloria 3 years ago
Unfortunately you and I don't have to believe in peak oil for it to bite us in the ass. The problem is there are men of the greatest power who do believe it, and they are going to war because of it and dragging our economy along with it. I am writing a book about it currently. Not a scholarly research book, but a how to survive guide, that's my area of expertise. Of course a lot of research has to be done for it anyway. Still keep smiling. Investigate 9/11.
beastshawnee 3 years ago
I agree, imagine if Steven Jones and others had NOT gone along with killing cold fusion 25 years ago. They know peak oil is a scam.
I call this a war crime.
paulagloria 3 years ago
Okay, but I still vote for austerity because it is still more sustainable for the earth and all the animals and plants other than ourselves. The more oil we pull out for our usage, the more pollution, the more extinctions follow. We are in a period of great extinction right now. The earth records only 5 major periods before this.
beastshawnee 4 years ago
I don't believe in Peak Oil, or global warming. Like you, that doesn't mean that I support consumer culture and wasteful and unnecessary behaviour. The ultimate "solution" is reduction of human populations.
perunatic 3 years ago
How can you not "beleive" in peak oil? There can't be an infinite amount of oil from a finite sized planet.
ManicEightBall 3 years ago
hi. you're right. so: 1. peak oil isn't necessarily inconsistent with the non-biotic theory, and 2. peak oil doesn't have to be interpreted as malthusian . anyhow, i think i regret posting the comments, and so i'd really appreciate it if you could remove them (inc. this one). thanks. - interesting video, good post, debate needed, thanks.
euclidxxx 4 years ago
do you know WarzSchoolchild? he sent me some info privately that I will look into....yes we must stay connected on this topic of great concern to economic well being to many many
paulagloria 4 years ago
nope, can't say i do.
euclidxxx 4 years ago
Webster's theory that many past civilizations died by oligarchy is supported by the record of history. The greatest gift we can give our children is a good education, so that they can see through the smoke and mirror tricks of the current oligarchs. The internet can assist this objective if the content is not subverted.
WarzSchoolchild 4 years ago
yes
paulagloria 4 years ago
Thanx Paula, I am very fortunate to have a wonderful Boss. Head of H.M.'s Household Scotland. Merlin Hay(Earl of Erroll)and myself have been very strong supporters of the Internet since it's inception. BTW we had advance info on 9/11. Also BTW. I am his Chaplain(Royal Military Police)
WarzSchoolchild 4 years ago
You're completely right. In 100 years there will be 10 trillion on the planet and we will all have SUVs and 50,000sq ft homes. The planet isn't finite, what 'kook' would believe that?
John201nz 4 years ago
@John201nz: I have a deep and abiding faith in the workings of nature and not man's machinations...I do not believe in population control nor that man is a problem on this planet...only grossly ignorant. but he must learn to ask the right questions before the right answers come
paulagloria 4 years ago
What I meant is that the guy in this video is grossly misinformed. He contradicts himself numerous times and doesn't seem to actually understand the issue.
John201nz 4 years ago 3
do you believe that on Mars (which is also showing signs of warming) they are driving SUV's I think man made global warming is a ridiculous theory and when I contact the main source of scholarship at the Byrd Polar Research center they keep passing the buck up to Lonnie Thompson himself when I ask for a representative to come and sit on a panel at a distinguished location and to video tape it
paulagloria 4 years ago
I did a thesis in my last year of high school on Peak Oil. From what I can see, the thesis depends on the info (ie. reserves, discoveries) coming from the oil companies and government agencies. So, the thesis depends on whether or not these companies are telling us the truth.
kulza23 4 years ago
Furthermore, there is still the question of whether oil is a fossil fuel or not. If it is, it makes great sense that it is finite and will run out. But, if oil is abiotic the whole situation changes. The problem with the abiotic theory is that it is very obscure and unknown, whereas fossil fuels are the commonly accepted science.
kulza23 4 years ago
Webster says that the Soviets are very scientific, but, correct me if I'm wrong, didn't the Soviets believe they could control what plants grew from seeds and thus screwed up their agriculture system?
kulza23 4 years ago
scientists can screw up, no?
paulagloria 4 years ago
True, so we shouldn't trust the Russian abiotic theory simply for the fact that they have a "serious scientific tradition". Logic and reason should always be our guide.
kulza23 4 years ago
@kulza23 ahh-h yes but to my knowledge the fossil theory was just sort of "put out there" by British at the turn of the century before last. Was NAY scientific work done on that theory? great to have your comments...thx for the connection
paulagloria 4 years ago
This guy is ok on the fiscal issues but clueless about the geological phenomenon of peak oil. It is physics, not economics.
dawnnaYT 4 years ago
Occam's razor asks which is the simpler explanation? Dry wells or a multi-national conspiracy by the world shadow government?
gangrelsurf 4 years ago
History suggests the latter
huckteeper 4 years ago
"If the "oilgopoly" has such a control over the world oil...why bother making a peak oil myth...?"
What was clear from this interview is since the decline of the "petro dollar", the fiat dollar has been harder to keep in check, or propped up to keep others in check. A myth could easily serve to raise the price per barrel in correlation with the declining petro dollar hegemony and resulting hyper-inflation and other fallout resulting from a floundering fiat dollar.
9Lapdog9 4 years ago
There will be always oil on earth. The point is, with India, china, USA, there will be not enough cheap and abondant oil for everyone, based on a Techno society consuming more and more energy. These people are insane or ignorant or inconcious. Already millions are suffering, soldiers are dying because of oil problem. Happy 4th of july, at least you have a roof and bread to eat, but no more mind to enjoy it. That what it's called decadence.
massagemantra 4 years ago 2
If the "oilgopoly" has such a control over the world oil quanities, why would they even bother making a peak oil myth, if they can get away with price gauging anyway? Peak oil is not a myth. And the reason US producion in all industires peaked in the 1970s was BECASUSE OIL PEAKED peak oil is always a record breaking year more oil = better econmy
KingMucktoad 4 years ago
i believe it is because they hide behind irresponsible fiscal policies that ppl are encouraged to participate in. IF you believe that oil is necessary for the economy they secretly you are FOR the war feeling it is necessary to support your lifestyle. It fosters self-hatred which becomes debilitating and thus such a population is easier to control
paulagloria 4 years ago
Oil IS nessessary to support our lifestyle, you twit. Without it how would you run your car? How would we grow our food? There is nothing in our entire society that oil dosen't effect.
I am not for this war, I am for finding alternative fuels. I could just as easily say that you are acctually in secret a repersentive of the oil industry thats trying to hid the truth, and that would be just as cedible as what toy have said.
KingMucktoad 4 years ago
who is "toy" (besides a typo)? This is a very EMOTIONAL subject, isn't it? I don't care what ppl think about me..I have almost 300 vids that speak for themselves for those with the patience to sample them...check out the playlist on zero point energy. u will be amazed
paulagloria 4 years ago
People can't handle the truth. I know man made global warming is to a large extent a hoax. But the truth is we are trashing and raping this planet. The less humans on this planet the better. The elites are justified in their campaign of austerity, destitution, and killing. This is a truth that almost no one can admit to themselves much less dare say. This is the ugliest truth.
Psychogenius018 4 years ago