Matt Cutts is talking too much about how Google can handle things.
I suggest Google will soon get back to worrying about "what the user can handle"... and bloated pages can crash a lot of slow systems for the user. So, Page Bloat Does matter in futureproof SEO even if Google are overlooking its significance this year.
I suspect Mr Cutts is answering the question as asked, rather than giving the full picture - is page bloat (benign) the same as code bloat (possibly malignant) I suspect not.
Well yeah, he's definitely not recommending you have a page that's 1.5mb in total size, that's still a really bad idea.
look at your crawl stats under Google Webmaster Central and see how long it's taking googlebot to download your page. Typically, lower latency+faster response time will return better results. Not necessarily better rankings, but googlebot will more likely want to crawl more pages if they're not having to download 1.5mb per page.
While I agree with you Matt that page bloat isn't as big of a thing as it used to be- if two sites are competing for the same keywords and one has trim concise code that separates markup from content, loads faster, etc. - if all other things like domain authority and linkbacks are the same - I can see page bloat being a factor that will negative effect rankings.
I love connecting with like-minded people. Add me!
internettopmentor 1 year ago
Matt Cutts is talking too much about how Google can handle things.
I suggest Google will soon get back to worrying about "what the user can handle"... and bloated pages can crash a lot of slow systems for the user. So, Page Bloat Does matter in futureproof SEO even if Google are overlooking its significance this year.
BirminghamDan 1 year ago
Regardless, why not have a clean, well-designed page!
bhicks111 2 years ago 11
I suspect Mr Cutts is answering the question as asked, rather than giving the full picture - is page bloat (benign) the same as code bloat (possibly malignant) I suspect not.
heenan73 2 years ago
Lean sites probably do well because they load faster and people can click through more pages without getting frustrated.
kevinargh 2 years ago 5
Well yeah, he's definitely not recommending you have a page that's 1.5mb in total size, that's still a really bad idea.
look at your crawl stats under Google Webmaster Central and see how long it's taking googlebot to download your page. Typically, lower latency+faster response time will return better results. Not necessarily better rankings, but googlebot will more likely want to crawl more pages if they're not having to download 1.5mb per page.
jonathandingman 2 years ago 2
Googlebot does not have "wants"
tantamnt 2 years ago
While I agree with you Matt that page bloat isn't as big of a thing as it used to be- if two sites are competing for the same keywords and one has trim concise code that separates markup from content, loads faster, etc. - if all other things like domain authority and linkbacks are the same - I can see page bloat being a factor that will negative effect rankings.
DanielDavidAllen 2 years ago
I understand that Google can figure out a lot of things but isn't it better if Google does not have to figure out anything?
Page bloat is still bad. I see websites that have a 1.5MB footprint and lots and lots of websites have 100k just in javascript.
fewsilly 2 years ago
I agree.
DanielDavidAllen 2 years ago
I thought google doesn't read javascript or css?
ShaneSelby 2 years ago
Google now read javascript, css, and xml too :)
rahnas 2 years ago
ok. Thanks =)
ShaneSelby 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok. Thanks =)
ShaneSelby 2 years ago