@Rematch727 Technically it is 60%. It's not 60% for the second scald, of course, but because it's 30 each team and this is a spread of two turns, it's 30% OR 30%, and with "or's", you add the percentage. So you have a 60% chance of getting the burn on one of the two scalds.
@Blazicune No, it would be 60% because you're adding 3/10 and 3/10 (or 30/100 and 30/100). You wouldn't add the denominator, therefore there is a 60% chance for scald to be used twice and get at least one burn.
Entertaining
MOVEeveryonegoesnuts 2 months ago
the odds of a burn after successive use where x is the number of turns.
1 - (7^x)/(10^x)
after 4 uses the odds of a burn are 75.99%
invaliddisplayname 2 months ago
A battle between the 2 guys i lost too due to hax...this shall be interesting
6ftHax 2 months ago
When he took out your Darmanitan, he should've used V-Create instead.
michael3214594 2 months ago
0.7*0.7 = 0.49 -> 49% of not burning either one of two scalds
Shinuslaw 2 months ago
i thought it was an elo battle cause of the background haha
SingsLikeThunder 2 months ago
Finally, a battle where I know both people. XD
Nice battle. 4 thumbs up.
GamerJayTV 2 months ago
its not a 60 percent chance to get a burn if you go for 2 scalds, its a 30 percent chance each time you use scald.
Rematch727 2 months ago
@Rematch727 I know, I just added up the percentage for both hits.
solosoloblackdude 2 months ago
@Rematch727 Technically it is 60%. It's not 60% for the second scald, of course, but because it's 30 each team and this is a spread of two turns, it's 30% OR 30%, and with "or's", you add the percentage. So you have a 60% chance of getting the burn on one of the two scalds.
CompulsiveOrigami 2 months ago
@CompulsiveOrigami Technically.... It would be 60% of 200%. Divide the two...
Blazicune 2 months ago
@Blazicune No, it would be 60% because you're adding 3/10 and 3/10 (or 30/100 and 30/100). You wouldn't add the denominator, therefore there is a 60% chance for scald to be used twice and get at least one burn.
CompulsiveOrigami 2 months ago
@CompulsiveOrigami That logic states that it would be impossible to not get a burn in 4 scalds, which is obviously false.
TehBrawlGuy 2 months ago
Really enjoyed this, subbed man.
chillahibbz 2 months ago
That ended quite awesomely :O
JumpingJumpluff28 2 months ago
well finally someone battled im bored to death thanks solosoloblackdude :D
MegaAwesomeVictini 2 months ago 7
@MegaAwesomeVictini You're welcome!
solosoloblackdude 2 months ago
i would like more battles from this guy :)
TheRizardon 2 months ago 2
I apologize for this battle for being almost 13 minutes, oh hell. But if you guys enjoyed it then that's all that really matters.
solosoloblackdude 2 months ago 11
Good battle :)
HockeyMan197 2 months ago
finally
bensonclarinet 2 months ago 2