So you have no problem if Google was owned by tobacco company, and there was a link on the front page that when clicked on goes to a page about the joys of the tobacco? It's absolutely insane that Al Gore's on the Board of Directors of global, and they're pulling this kind of stunt.We're talking about a link on the front page of Google that when clicked on automatically plays Al Gore's video without any further interaction on your part.
who are we to say what a private company can or cannot do with its own product. So if car companies are labeling their cars as environmentally-friendly, are they also breaching some sort of public trust? Tobacco companies are causing millions of deaths each year and we are worried about google supporting al gore. And it says "explore impact of climate change on Google Earth". So it's a function that Google Earth can carry. If you don't want to learn about climate change, don't click on it.
You have no problem if Google was owned by a tobacco company and had a link on their main page when clicked on plays a video about joys of tobacco? You have no problem with this type of conflict of interest? Wow, you are one naive person. Al Gore is on the board of directors of Carbon trading company. And he also on the Board of directors of Google. Furthermore the link is not displayed as a advertisement but a direct link that starts playing the video without user intervention. This is scandal!
Fine I will give you the lack of user intervention part about the video. But since when did Google become a public service? You probably need to check your dictionary but conflict of interest can only occur if an organization is entrusted with impartiality. Unless Google has explicitly claimed that the information is unbiased on its website or that it works for the government, then there is no conflict of interest.
Conflict of interest is not permitted in any form of media. A blogger who receives ANY in kind payment to review a product must by law disclose that fact. Stars promoting products must disclose when being paid for opinions. I not arguing Google is a public service, I am arguing it is a dishonest and conflict of interest to have that link disguised as information without disclosure of conflicts. Google is being impartial in an dishonest way. Why do you stand here and support dishonesty so much?
So if someone is corrupt and you dont like what theyre doing, then just stand here and ignore it? So if you dont like the coal industry then dont complain but just dont use coal? If we apply your silly logical reasoning here, then if you dont like what you see and hear on you-tube then why the hell you standing here posting and complaining about what you read here then? Your hypocrisy here is astounding. BTW I never said not to use Google, I simply said they are dishonest and corrupt.
So your reasoning that if you dont like Coal, or Google, or you what you see posted on you-tube then dont complain, but dont use Coal, Google or in this case you-tube. Why then are you not applying this law and idealism to yourself? So be like Gore running around the planet telling everybody to live conserving lifestyle, but he ignores this living the life of mansions, limousines, private jets. Man you lefts socialists sure are screwed up. Your preaching never applies to the preacher
Okay, was it necessay to post that twice? Well, I'm sorry if I AM a hypocryte, but at least I'm a hypocrite who isn't ignorant about SCIENTIFIC facts about global warming, nor am claiming that there is a COOLING TREND instead. Seriously, why are you so against global warming? Are you saying that it's a propaganda for canada's economic revenu? Then tell me, what was the point of the kyoto accord? Or the meeting at Copenhagen? Why is global warming the GLOBAL concern and NOT the cooling trend?
I am against global warming because its a bunch of socialist bull crap. What government on the planet isnt looking for a way to take more money out of your pocket? If you looked at Copenhagen, it was NEVER about the science, it was about all the countries lined up at the pig trough divvying up the spoils of hopefully this new taxation system. This green BS is bad because by slapping a green sticker on their policies means they can sell it to you. The Bio fuel fiasco is an perfect example.
Countries spend billions of tax dollars subsidizing Bio fuels under the guise of green. Weve had food riots rights in parts of the world this year. Costs of basic foodstuffs have more then doubled. The World Bank estimates vast majority of the huge cost rise in foodstuffs has been due to pushing Bio fuels. One tank of bio fuel in an SUV is enough food to feed approx. 4 people for one year. They just slap a green sticker on any government policy and they can sell it to suckers like you.
Looking at the link and the response it had, I'm just AMAZED at how they immediately say "It's a cooling trend!" yet they miss what the author wrote at the end. Someone said no matter what changes the climate is going through, the, "result of climate-skeptics efforts is that they remove all impetus to ever develop cleaner, renewable means of generating power and more efficient technologies." Which made me question, "What are ppl like YOU trying to do? What good are you bringing to the world?"
On another note, please send me a link which indicates where Canada is putting the Carbon tax to.
black11235813 2 years ago
Do you not know how google works?!
Skydancer365 2 years ago
Albertkallal:
Sorry, but you're a conspiracy theorist.
Skydancer365 2 years ago
So you have no problem if Google was owned by tobacco company, and there was a link on the front page that when clicked on goes to a page about the joys of the tobacco? It's absolutely insane that Al Gore's on the Board of Directors of global, and they're pulling this kind of stunt.We're talking about a link on the front page of Google that when clicked on automatically plays Al Gore's video without any further interaction on your part.
Albertkallal 2 years ago
who are we to say what a private company can or cannot do with its own product. So if car companies are labeling their cars as environmentally-friendly, are they also breaching some sort of public trust? Tobacco companies are causing millions of deaths each year and we are worried about google supporting al gore. And it says "explore impact of climate change on Google Earth". So it's a function that Google Earth can carry. If you don't want to learn about climate change, don't click on it.
callilax 2 years ago
You have no problem if Google was owned by a tobacco company and had a link on their main page when clicked on plays a video about joys of tobacco? You have no problem with this type of conflict of interest? Wow, you are one naive person. Al Gore is on the board of directors of Carbon trading company. And he also on the Board of directors of Google. Furthermore the link is not displayed as a advertisement but a direct link that starts playing the video without user intervention. This is scandal!
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Fine I will give you the lack of user intervention part about the video. But since when did Google become a public service? You probably need to check your dictionary but conflict of interest can only occur if an organization is entrusted with impartiality. Unless Google has explicitly claimed that the information is unbiased on its website or that it works for the government, then there is no conflict of interest.
callilax 2 years ago
and by the way, I just checked out some of your other videos. The facts presented in your videos are not accurate.
callilax 2 years ago
Conflict of interest is not permitted in any form of media. A blogger who receives ANY in kind payment to review a product must by law disclose that fact. Stars promoting products must disclose when being paid for opinions. I not arguing Google is a public service, I am arguing it is a dishonest and conflict of interest to have that link disguised as information without disclosure of conflicts. Google is being impartial in an dishonest way. Why do you stand here and support dishonesty so much?
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Then don't use google, if you find them so 'dishonest'? Hypocrite.
black11235813 2 years ago
So if someone is corrupt and you dont like what theyre doing, then just stand here and ignore it? So if you dont like the coal industry then dont complain but just dont use coal? If we apply your silly logical reasoning here, then if you dont like what you see and hear on you-tube then why the hell you standing here posting and complaining about what you read here then? Your hypocrisy here is astounding. BTW I never said not to use Google, I simply said they are dishonest and corrupt.
Albertkallal 2 years ago
So your reasoning that if you dont like Coal, or Google, or you what you see posted on you-tube then dont complain, but dont use Coal, Google or in this case you-tube. Why then are you not applying this law and idealism to yourself? So be like Gore running around the planet telling everybody to live conserving lifestyle, but he ignores this living the life of mansions, limousines, private jets. Man you lefts socialists sure are screwed up. Your preaching never applies to the preacher
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Okay, was it necessay to post that twice? Well, I'm sorry if I AM a hypocryte, but at least I'm a hypocrite who isn't ignorant about SCIENTIFIC facts about global warming, nor am claiming that there is a COOLING TREND instead. Seriously, why are you so against global warming? Are you saying that it's a propaganda for canada's economic revenu? Then tell me, what was the point of the kyoto accord? Or the meeting at Copenhagen? Why is global warming the GLOBAL concern and NOT the cooling trend?
black11235813 2 years ago
I am against global warming because its a bunch of socialist bull crap. What government on the planet isnt looking for a way to take more money out of your pocket? If you looked at Copenhagen, it was NEVER about the science, it was about all the countries lined up at the pig trough divvying up the spoils of hopefully this new taxation system. This green BS is bad because by slapping a green sticker on their policies means they can sell it to you. The Bio fuel fiasco is an perfect example.
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Countries spend billions of tax dollars subsidizing Bio fuels under the guise of green. Weve had food riots rights in parts of the world this year. Costs of basic foodstuffs have more then doubled. The World Bank estimates vast majority of the huge cost rise in foodstuffs has been due to pushing Bio fuels. One tank of bio fuel in an SUV is enough food to feed approx. 4 people for one year. They just slap a green sticker on any government policy and they can sell it to suckers like you.
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Why don't you " Google " GREENLAND HOCKEY STICKS . Read the first link.
uboat21 2 years ago
ERG, you talking to me or him?
black11235813 2 years ago
Comment removed
black11235813 2 years ago
Comment removed
black11235813 2 years ago
Looking at the link and the response it had, I'm just AMAZED at how they immediately say "It's a cooling trend!" yet they miss what the author wrote at the end. Someone said no matter what changes the climate is going through, the, "result of climate-skeptics efforts is that they remove all impetus to ever develop cleaner, renewable means of generating power and more efficient technologies." Which made me question, "What are ppl like YOU trying to do? What good are you bringing to the world?"
black11235813 2 years ago
Comment removed
black11235813 2 years ago
Nice one Albert!
order9066 2 years ago