im not an expert on bullets and military weapons, but isnt a military bullet supposed to break apart and spread throughout the body to deal as much damage as possible? well if they hit maybe 6 inches below the neck, isnt it possible that a shrapnel from the bullet went through his neck, and another through the windshield?
@iownu1324 Actually, military bullets are of the full metal jacket type, which do NOT fragment. Frangible, soft point, and hollow point bullets are banned by the Geneva convention. It's apparently more polite to kill people with FMJ rounds.
@vydeoynkhorne8:01 Really? This weapon system had to be tested on a president to know if it would be effective against a head of state in a vehicle? It wouldn't have worked correctly if it wasn't being pointed at anything other than the leader of a nation?
hey i dont know if im right probably not but doesnt it seem that his wife when he looked down put a gun to his head and shot then pushed his body down a bit then rushed away from the president????!!!!!!
Forget all the bullshit that came in after 11/22/1963,the doctors at Parkland hospital know the thruth,the autopsy at Bethesda was a total scam ,the people that were there on the Knoll heard and saw shots from behind the fence,James Files knows what happened that day,he may not have been the shooter, but he was with the shooter and desrcibes the scene very well.The reason his head blew up was because the Remmington fireball was loaded with a mercury bullet.
James Files claims that Charles Nicoletti was in the Dal-Tex building,Oswald was eating a sandwich on the second floor and never fired a shot...yes,he was set up!!
@nicenonya3 OK, so if the throat wound is an entry, the shallow angle would have the exit pointing down at the trunk of the car. where is the damage caused by this bullet?
@vydeoynkhorne I don't know where the throat shot came from,probably the grassy knoll,as everyone there that day will tell you,and it wasn't 6 stories up.WHO SAID THAT THERE HAD TO BE AN EXIT WOUND? It PROBABLY lodged in his spine.
@nicenonya3 the throat wound lines up with the triple overpass and not the grassy knoll, and a bullet fired into soft tissue like his throat would certainly exit somewhere
@vydeoynkhorne ,Well I don't know,because the Warren omission covered up most of the evidence,didn't they?There might have been a shooter in the sewer drain in front of Dealey plaza,James Files says he was one of two shooters on the knoll,how do you explain the bullet hole in the windshield,many people saw that at Parkland ,and they claim it was from the front also.There was most likely more than one team of shooters.
@nicenonya3 all I can say is that I've been studying this and interviewing people since 1973. my conclusions are outlined in my video. thanks for your comments, and I try to keep an open mind and not be too nutty like some of my fellow conspiracy buffs
@vydeoynkhorne May I suggest burning the Warren omission report,it's based on lies,,they wanted to put all "three" shots from the 6th floor and Oswald.Even Grerry Ford admits that the back wound was altered.NOW WHY WOULD THEY ALTER THE WOUND??? IF THAT DOESN'T TELL YOU SOMETHING,I GIVE UP>>..
Search youtube video: JFK Assassination Storm Drain Shooter Theory Debunked.
Then search youtube video: JFK Zapruder Film Closeup. WATCH IT.
Don't you find it very disturbing Jacqueline NEVER comforts her husband. Why does she just stare at Gov. Connally all the time?. She failed on both accounts to comfort & get JFK out of the firing line or flag down any agent.
The temple explosion is actually the exit wound fired from the left side of his head. His head?. BACK & TO THE LEFT.
the goverment knows who did it. they have files and stuff about it that keep secret cause all the presidents up till now have signed to keep it secret.
JFK got thrown back and to the left indicating a shot not from behind, but from the front right. I think they either had a shooter on the grassy knoll or in the storm drain. And the driver was in on it because he slowed down to almost a complete stop like a piece of shit.
no from behind, it was the brainmatter getting compressed & forced out of the side of his head, this made his head recoil the way it did, back & to the left!!
There would have been a bullet exit wound somewhere on the left side of JFK's head if the shot came from the Knoll or storm drain, which wasn't the case.
@Sick3ninVend3tta the storm drain was on the right side of the street right past the sign. and getting shot from that angle is very logical. your head wont jerk back that hard or at all getting shot from behind. it woud go forward before it came back.
@Sick3ninVend3tta you can watch it over and over again her hands are both down by her no where does it show a hand come behind his head or in front of his head. and if he go shot from behind the impact of the bullet wouldnt blow the front of his head like it did. the storm drain is tough but its possible and not to mention the skin and everything blowing back like that,his head jerking back so hard. that the shot could have been close like governor connally did it. he had the angle. but idk
@xenomann442 the triple underpass portion is "not to scale" sorry, I couldn't frame the car and the overpass with any detail if the proportions were actual, so I compressed them. robert groden made the same observation that you had
I believe in a sniper in the 3rd floor of the Dal-Tex building, and a sniper in the storm drain in front of the car.
This video makes a lot of sense too.
But there's no way anyone will know. The shooters themselves don't even know who killed Kennedy. the Zapruder and Dorman films were altered. Everyone reports shots from different places, people were impersonating secret service all over the place that day. Definitely a conspiracy, but no one will know who exactly did it.
This video has so many things wrong with it. First of all, in the "scope" view of oswald, that is nowhere near the angle of where the first shot was fired. Second of all, a bullet could easily go through the governor's seat, and third of all, the skull analysis is completely wrong. Most people know that the exit wound is usually greater than the entrance in a high caliber rifle. It entered kennedy's skull at an angle, then blew the top front of his skull out. Nuff said.
This video infers suttle , mysterious , thingamajig wit da trunk ?
SS puts bubble top put on for flight (preservation of crime scene evidence) to DC , then photographed & bullet fragments recovered (forward compartments) .
When the FBI burned the tosty Hosty note calls immediately go out for it's disbandment . When it does it's job properly , JFK Conspiracy Do-Gooders repay them w/a 'Big whopper' !
This video proves that all the good shooting locations had already been taken .
This video contains many misleading factoids BTW .
Tests done with ballistic gell simulating human fleash proves bullets don't follow a straight line when going through people , especially two people . They can change course after entering and change course again after exiting .
yes, I heard there was a theory that michael jacksons other glove was involved and that is why it has never been seen...and he did like small ninjas, so there you are, QED
In the end, the JFK of history is hardly a man who needed to be removed from office by shadowy, nameless forces from w/in the USG . The notion that these nebuolous anti-Progressive plotters acted in order to bring in the domestic liberal agenda of LBJ & were able to get Chief Justice Earl Warren & the man who would not let Ernesto Miranda go to jail because a police officer forgot to read him his rights, to be a willing part of the overall scheme, is simply idiotic.
All things considered , I'm usually intolerable , quick with a rebuttle , stinging criticism of stewpidity when I hear it , other than that , I'm in a extra shitty mood most of the time :-)
oh my..i had never seen a vid that shows the second shot in fact i didnt know he got shot twice..his wife even if she was behind all this..she should freaked out!! that was terrible
Watch "JFK: Beyond the Magic Bullet" on the discovery channel. It wasnt really a magic bullet at all. I believed conspiracy till i watched this. It explains how Oswald could have done this with 3 bullets, with evidence to back it up.
You state that the shot had to come from below that hit JFK in the back of the head. NO shot hit JFK in the back of the head, it was the back part of the right ear and then the massive exit wound in the back of the head.
David Lifton Explains the altered wound in the top front of JFK's head, a crude attempt to justify the conclusion a shot was from behind.
Plus the acoustic evidence shows us where all the shots were from.
Jackie was on trunk to get jFK's head part blown out the back.
that's the distinction he is trying to make, that the skull info shown was wrong, that reports say that there was broken skull at the top of the head, not the right side of the ear... listen to what he says at the start
watch the video again and see around 3:58 - the zapruder film cleary shows the matter from kennedy's head blowing up and forward, not toward the trunk
if the PARTY of people whom plotted this assassination exist,..than more than likely they still congregate and if so more than likely have plotted other evil doings? do we know of any?
Try this. Try using those same ideas, but use the Dal-Tex as the origin of the shots as opposed to a concealed weapon on the trunk of the car. I'm just as curious about this as you are and I really like your idea. It certainly makes sense.
That's a very interesting point you make. The headshot going through Kennedy's head and hitting Connally. But the problem is, the entry wound is above the right temple as it is smaller. The exit is in the back of Kennedy's head as it is bigger.
As for the concealed weapon theory, yeah it make sense. But idk. Is there much evidence to support it?
Once again, very well thought out video. I like your reasoning. But can you show me more evidence?
I don't know much about a concealed weapon near the trunk. I suppose it's always a possibility. Hasn't yet been ruled out. But I think the shot that hit Kennedy in the back and continued into Connally's right armpit came out of the Dal-Tex Building. Oswald never fired that shot. It's the wrong angle. I don't think the headshot came from the Knoll, but there was a shooter there. I think the headshot came from in front. However, I do find your theory interesting.
I am fan of guns. I don´t belive that low velocity gun can make this massive blow out of his skull.
Wound is so huge!! This can do hunter high velocity bullet only. BUT your theory is so impressive - it can be true (trunk can contain special CIA prepared gun with hih velocity ammo+high explosive bullet). Kennedy was squat - it is so weird - it looks like he knows will be shot and his wife was outside the buller trajectory-it seems to be planned.
very interesting. thank you. the wound are very odds, the remote control gun is indeed a viable alternative. if i want to be absolutely sure of the outcome!!!! great video. thanx again.
I am so tired of these JFK and other conspiracy theory videos. We all know that JFK was killed by the illuminait bankers for threatening to expose them. The mission was carried by the Luciferian C.I.A. But there is nothing we can do about it unless we revolt militarily. They might admit to it 100 years from now which is why G.W. Bush tried to pass a law that seals all government records for 100 years when a gov. official leaves office. They are so corrupt that it's disgusting. What will you do?
this video claims connolly was sitting directly in front of jfk,not true,in fact he was sitting in a fold down jump seat,slightly towards the centre of the limo and also a little lower than the seat jfk was on.this video is a bit of a stretch i think,grasping at straws.multible shots were fired by several assasins,some probably had some sort of a suppressor so many were not even heard.witnesses who report hearing more than 3 shots were told you are mistaken,cover up at the highest level.
This has to be the most crackpot theory I've ever heard. This beats out the manhole assassin "idea" and the gem that one of the Secret Service Agents in the front seat fired the fatal shot. A round of Kool-Aid for all of you.
the only crack pot theory is the discovery channel "beyond the magic bullet" and if you watch my rebuttal video "way beyond beyond the magic bullet" you can see that their video falsified the angles and in reality connally and jfk could not have been hit by the first shot alledgely fired by oswald
You know I agree with you, this theory is a bit ridiculous and the autopsy photos are doctored and the skull model is extremely inaacurate... but it's still more believable than the THEORY that Lee Harvey Oswald managed to kill the president on his own...
Ever read the FBI and CIA files on Oswald???
They knew where this guy was every second of his life...
The Warren Commission was a fraud along with the HSCA .
No. I'm not completely ruling out the chance others were involved, but Washington is a town that leaks like a sieve. My late uncle was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for 25 years, and he read all of the Warren Commission materials. He became convinced both Oswald and Ruby acted alone. Truth is quite often stranger than fiction, and I'm leaning toward the conclusion of Gerald Posner's "Case Closed." Oswald missed with shot one, hit JFK & Connolly with shot two and killed JFK with shot three.
pretty strange that.from when he defected and came back you can understand why they would be watching him,but before then,maybe he was being sheep dipped so as to look like a nut,a lone gunman nut with military training who chooses to use the worst rifle you could get for this assasination.would someone with military training use a carcano when he possibly could have used a much more accurate weapon,semi-auto,militaty type weapons that would be available in some states at that time.carcano=crap
This is without a doubt the dumbest conspiracy video I have ever seen. Hahahaha!
Alright alright, so someone was hiding in the trunk? OK. So if there was someone in the trunk waiting to kill Kennedy or there was a "remote controlled gun".. why would they pull the trigger at that moment? The gun in the trunk theory is nothing but bullshit.
Kennedy was shot from the grass knoll area near the railroad tracks.
yeah,it is a bit much,also the narrator called diem nu,i think nu was diems brother,he got blown away as well.this remote control gun thing,i dont think so.i agree thier were assassins behind the fence on the grassy knoll,i also think thier were 2 or 3 more teams of assassins around dealy plaza.according to chancery holt he saw at least 6 world class assassins in and around dealy plaza that day.check out spooks,hoods & the hidden elite,you can google the whole video.very interesting.
Why would Jackie be "reaching for bits of brain and skull"? That, plus testing the gun by assassinating the Vietnamese guys didn't make sense. Otherwise a good video and perspective.
I know what is goig on here. I'm no dummy you know. Andy Kaufman is not, in fact dead, he is masquerading as vydeoynkhorne!! I can swear that is Jerry Lawler doing the voice over! I knew you weren't dead Andy!! I knew it. The video was kinda good, but please tell me that you are you gonna do another Saturday Night Live? I just love your Elvis impersonation. Oh, Please say you will!
William Cooper claims it was the limo driver that fired the fatal shot to the head. He shows the full screen version and not the this zoomed in version of the Zabruder film. He also says the Warren Commission never saw the full screen Zabruder film.
Don't you think that one of the bystanders along the parade route would have noticed a gun popping up out of the trunk and firing and then returning to the trunk?
you need to stop masturbating to oliver stone and william cooper in your grammas basementand do something more ambitious like try out this theory and blow out your own brains
vydeoynkhorne, please demonstrate that your theory is plausible.
Where was the hole in the trunk through which the bullet passed, and how large was it?
And how did they set this thing up without firing test shots, which would have put bullet holes in the trunk surface?
And if the hole was more than a few millimeters in diameter, why didn't anyone notice it - Clint Hill for example, who was on that trunk all the way to Parkland?
Bob asks you to "remove the video." Oh god, Bob are you kidding!!! You (bob harris) have posted three separate assasination theories that are even more nutty than this one. When are you going to unblock me Bobbie and let me reply to your whacky videos anyway?
sorry mag30th, the only thing more nutty is "beyond the magic bullet" showing the bullet emerging from jfk's sternum despite exact measurements and angles. if it came out his throat, then I'd be first to say "lone nut assassin"
my video demonstrates the plausibility. the hole is the diameter of a typical antennae hole, certainly large enough for a muzzle. and my video said they test fired it in vietnam. clint hill suffered from depression for many years, made few comments about the assassination (one to mike wallace) and could have been coerced into keeping his mouth shut.
How could something like that have been rigged in the trunk, without risking discovery by the Secret Service agents??
Or were they all in on it?
Was Clint Hill in on it?? Odd, for a guy who almost got himself run over and killed, trying to get to the President.
All the Bugliosi's and Posners of the world cannot do NEARLY the damage to the credibility of a JFK conspiracy, that conspiracy people can, publishing half-baked, goofy theories.
Ok, I am looking at your vid at 1:20. A pistol is mounting inside the cylinder, right?
By your calculations, where was the hole drilled in the trunk lid to allow the bullet to pass? And what approximately, were the dimensions of the hole?
if this took place as I claim in the video, at least one ss agent knew. I have been unable to confirm what purpose the cylinder was. Robert Groeden believes it to be an airconditioner for the passenger compartment. hess and eisenhardt (the company that modified the car, never returned my inquiries.
an intact bullet was "found" on a stretcher, not in connally's thigh.
in my video, I show the only moment connally's armpit is not covered by the jump seat back. it's at frame 312. I sincerely believe a fragment hit him then
Connally was hit by an intact bullet. The entry wound in his back was large and elongated. And the bullet deposited particles in his wrist, which could only have come from the inside of a whole bullet.
well im really really confused about the angle of dangle......one proves Oswald killed JFK...other proves there were atleast 3 shooters.....and also something abt magic bullets.....now comes concealed weapons at back of the trunk of the limo.....which is operated by remote control.....well i dunno wat to believe.......anyways nice vids...
but the cloud analogy is poetic...reminds me of the michelangelo antononi film where the photographer sees imagery in the prints he makes of an assassination..."blow up"
I have been accused of an over active imagination
i can see your way of thinking about this, but i dont see it working. all the doctors at parklands hospital cannot be wrong when saying the exit wound was on the back of his head! the windscreen had a full hole in it and was replaced while he was at the hospital according to several witnesses.
ions girl there was NO overwhelming evidence incriminating oswald. it was all coincidental, that is why he had to die before trial, they could NOT convict him
That is complete rubbish and shows you have not really looked into this case whatsoever. Your claim about the windshield is entirely wrong - there was no hole. There was a crack. And thorough tests were conducted on that crack to show that it was struck by a projectile from the inside. Those tests were NOT done at the hospital. Show me one citation from a witness that supports what you said.
nuwuck, you need to read the Warren Report, and in particular, the testimony of the doctors. What was actually said by the emergency doctors trying to save Kennedy's life to the Warren Commission and what has been said since vary considerably. By their own admission, the head wound was barely looked at and again by their admission, JFK was on his back - giving the impression of a rear wound on the head. It is the authenticated autopsy photos, x-rays and testimony that are of vital importance.
As far as your claim that the evidence against LHO was coincidental (did you mean "circumstantial"?), I've sent you an email as there's too much to list here. Do me a favour after you read it, reply with all the hard, credible, physical evidence that supports a shooter OTHER than Oswald
To : All - In any post investigation that proposes a different solution 2 1 that was agreed 2 upon in the WCR has 2 use the scientific method 2 replace the agreed upon conclusion (SBT) . This means that not only do U have 2 disprove the SBT but U have 2 prove that it couldn't of happened any other way . This is the agreed upon way of disproving a accepted norm . It's up 2 the advocate & his superabnormal position 2 take the lead & wrest it out of the hands of the accepted position .
To : vydeoynkhorne "I thought I did that with my video"
Well ....? That's open 2 interpretation . U still have 2 explain how JFK's lung was bruised & how the tract of damage from back 2 front @ a downward angle coresponds w/ your upward angle shot . I just have a hard time picturing that .
Ok, there have been some absolute rippers regarding conspiracy assassination theory - but this one takes the cake! I am utterly astounded that so much effort it literally wasted on this when the OVERWHELMING WEIGHT OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE points to Lee Harvey Oswald as the LONE killer. This video is interesting (to say the least!) but it's typical conspiracy agenda - your apparent "proof" is in the questions you raise - not the answers you provide. This provides none.
try putting the entry and exit wounds on a friend, then place them in a car seat similar to the limo seat. then tell me what trajectory you come up with.
But the bullet entry wounds line up with shots fired from the Depository's 6th floor. One of the greatest tricks you pull in this video is the way you manipulte the angles to suit your theory. Have you ever looked at Dale Myers' 3D analysis of Dealey Plaza and the bullet trajectories? It lines up a whole lot better - but more importantly, it corroborrates the physical evidence in the case
I discussed this with dale myers. he said "I used the entry in connally and the exit in kennedy to point back to the depository window." exact quote.
I said why didn't you use jfk's wounds or just connally's. he said he didn't know jfk's exact entry.
How do you know it was "a big lie"? Where is your proof? Just saying the words "big lie" doesn't make it so. Also, your film has some crucial errors that will confuse the average viewer. Your "Depository View" through the scope is not right and needs to be corrected.
In 500 words? Ok, I'll try. The bullet entered the back of his head at around 2000 ft/sec and broke apart. The fragments exited. The kinetic energy that the bullet imparted on the inside of the head as it was slowed by the brain tissue caused a massive build-up of pressure. This pressure was released in the graphic fashion seen in the Z-Film. But from a purely physics POV, the explosion didn't really need to be on the right side of the head - it could have been anywhere
Your right "VegasVentura" Bravo ! Good to see someone uses his brain around this conspiracy coo coo clock prison ! The technical name for the force that builds up behind the bullet is called a 'temporal cavity' and is indeed what caused JFK's brain to be ejected out the right side of his head .
Don't believe false facts? That's what I'm doing! You haven't actually provided any solid proof that there was a gun in the trunk. It's all been speculation and attempts at discrediting the Warren Report findings - standard tactic. So then, how do you account for the all the physical evidence pointing to Oswald (shell casings, bullets etc), witness testimony confirming him as the shooter and the fact that NOT ONE witness interviewed by the WC has EVER reported the shots coming from the trunk?
For more info : > karws dot gso dot uri dot edu /jfk/jfk dot html > Scientific Topics > Wound Ballistis > How a high-speed bullet damages an organ . It's a eye opener by one of the U.S.'s foremost authorities on the subject, Dr. Vincent J. M. Di Maio . Then see Prof. Rahn's Monograph length treatise on the subject .
What a breath of fresh air to see someone else has actually put some time into reading the info on Ken Rahn's site. In my opinion, from a scientific standpoint, the info on that website is the best I have seen. Larry Sturdivan's book (which is mentioned on that site) is also well worth the read for a comprehensive understanding of wound ballistics
Got one other thing to say about a section of the video dealing with the splice in the Z-Film and the narration asking the question whether or not that splice hides a puff of smoke....there are other films (Nix, Muchmore etc) as well as the Moorman photo that are good at establishing the absurdity of this claim
shows how little you really know. camera shooting angles and light reflectivity can affect how a puff of smoke is photographed. the zap film is 180 degrees different from the muchmore/nix films. even the head burst is barely visible from the muchmore/nix yet is clearly visible in the zap film
The muchmore/nix films were shot on the opposite side of JFK's head . Nix did not use the adjusting lens that came with the camera for that type of indoor film . (See Disc. Chann. Unsolved History JFK : Death in Dealy Plaza)Je would of also got a good shot of the grassy knoll during the shooting but he muffed it and tryed to compensate by telling story's of a grassy knoll shooter .
Can I ask you this... Are you stating that it is your conclusive opinion that there was a concealed gun in the trunk of the limo that delivered the fatal head shot? So besides fiddling with trajectories and citing grainy footage that doesn't actually show a gun, how then do you account for the evidence against Oswald (bullets matching casings matching a rifle etc)? You do agree that the burden of proof is on you here (I hope)
I never said ozzie was innocent. his declaration "I'm a patsy" could have meant that he was just firing in the air...part of some "draw attention to cuba" thing.
can you honestly say that the throat shot was a perfect angle up to ozzie? have you plotted the autopsy pics on a stand-in to verify this, or do you accept dale myers stiff drawings? he did a nice animation though!
I saw your email and I have done the stand-in (both in the past and again now). The problem is that it is so subjective. A slight movement creates a flow-on effect that is massive. We don't have the actual car, the actual conditions etc. This is why the best evidence is the physical evidence - Oswald's rifle, Oswald's bullets - fired by Oswald.
why did oswald have gun residue on his hands but not his face? to aim a rifle effectivley it needs to be near your face. secret service were alone with oswalds body in the funeral parlour.. is it inconceivable that they placed his palm print on the weapon there
It's not inconceivable at all...but until you have proof, it's a pointless avenue to pursue. Also, what is your basis for claiming the gun residue on LHO? The paraffin tests conducted by the FBI? You really should research that a little more. That test was and is considered one of the least effective, eg, for comparison, 20 random people were paraffin tested...the test showed that 10 had fired guns. Says it all.
Also, if the SS were with LHO and were being subversive, why did they do only half a job. If they were there to frame him, why not ensure that gun residue patterns were perfect (ie, all over his face and hands) thus leaving no questions to ever be raised?
"but do palm prints & or fingerprint patterns on the hands degrade after death w/tissue breakdown?"
Has nothing to do w/that. Fingerprints are left because while people are alive they excrete a thin film of 'grease' or 'body oil' out of there pores . After death this exaporates very quikly and it's no longer possible to obtain fingerprints w/out using whats used when fingerprinting suspects . Another bold faced lie told by CTer's who piss on the memory of JFK while lying for self glory & $ .
"regarding smoke from bullets, haven't makers moved on from cordite and established smokeless ammunition by then or...?"
In 1884 Paul Vieille invented a smokeless gunpowder called Poudre B . Modern ammunition emits very little smoke . The proponents of a "Puff of smoke" from the knoll are pulling peoles legs .
Also, to clarify, I'm not saying Dale Myers is 1005 correct. However, the work he did in that animation by taking into account every aspect of Dealey Plaza that was possible to take into account based on the films is by far the most impressive piece of work. The fact that he lined up the shot using JFK's exit wound and Connolly's entrance is not a major issue as the physical evidence supports him doing this
yet the physical evidence of ozzie's gun needs to match the evidence of the wounds. by saying the subjective view of the throat wound etc, you realize this indicates "reasonable doubt" that would have been seized on by the defense.
The subjective view is only MY subjective view. I'm not a criminal investigator. But throuhgout every piece of literature I've read and from my own experience, I find that the wounds DO match Oswald's gun and position - from doctor's testimony to autopsy photos to simulated recreations to witness testimony.
Im gonna be upset if I watch this and u try and tell me Oswald was one of the shooters.
thatstheguy07 2 weeks ago
@thatstheguy07
are you upset then?
irmbrown 2 weeks ago
@thatstheguy07 Yea I dono about this theory...
thatstheguy07 2 weeks ago
im not an expert on bullets and military weapons, but isnt a military bullet supposed to break apart and spread throughout the body to deal as much damage as possible? well if they hit maybe 6 inches below the neck, isnt it possible that a shrapnel from the bullet went through his neck, and another through the windshield?
iownu1324 8 months ago
@iownu1324 Actually, military bullets are of the full metal jacket type, which do NOT fragment. Frangible, soft point, and hollow point bullets are banned by the Geneva convention. It's apparently more polite to kill people with FMJ rounds.
@vydeoynkhorne 8:01 Really? This weapon system had to be tested on a president to know if it would be effective against a head of state in a vehicle? It wouldn't have worked correctly if it wasn't being pointed at anything other than the leader of a nation?
drewdane40 4 months ago
hey i dont know if im right probably not but doesnt it seem that his wife when he looked down put a gun to his head and shot then pushed his body down a bit then rushed away from the president????!!!!!!
MrTheVidster 1 year ago
The men who killed Kennedy episode 1 (5-5)
nicenonya3 1 year ago
The men who killed Kennedy episode 1 (4-5)
nicenonya3 1 year ago
Forget all the bullshit that came in after 11/22/1963,the doctors at Parkland hospital know the thruth,the autopsy at Bethesda was a total scam ,the people that were there on the Knoll heard and saw shots from behind the fence,James Files knows what happened that day,he may not have been the shooter, but he was with the shooter and desrcibes the scene very well.The reason his head blew up was because the Remmington fireball was loaded with a mercury bullet.
nicenonya3 1 year ago
if these shots came from the trunk,why did they have the SS back off behind the limo?
nicenonya3 1 year ago
James Files claims that Charles Nicoletti was in the Dal-Tex building,Oswald was eating a sandwich on the second floor and never fired a shot...yes,he was set up!!
nicenonya3 1 year ago
windshield shot was also from the front,what a total waste of time!! thanks for the laughs
nicenonya3 1 year ago
wrong,the neck wound was an entry wound!!!
And Oswald never fired a shot!
this video is bullshit
nicenonya3 1 year ago 2
@nicenonya3 OK, so if the throat wound is an entry, the shallow angle would have the exit pointing down at the trunk of the car. where is the damage caused by this bullet?
vydeoynkhorne 1 year ago
@vydeoynkhorne I don't know where the throat shot came from,probably the grassy knoll,as everyone there that day will tell you,and it wasn't 6 stories up.WHO SAID THAT THERE HAD TO BE AN EXIT WOUND? It PROBABLY lodged in his spine.
nicenonya3 1 year ago 2
@nicenonya3 the throat wound lines up with the triple overpass and not the grassy knoll, and a bullet fired into soft tissue like his throat would certainly exit somewhere
vydeoynkhorne 1 year ago
@vydeoynkhorne ,Well I don't know,because the Warren omission covered up most of the evidence,didn't they?There might have been a shooter in the sewer drain in front of Dealey plaza,James Files says he was one of two shooters on the knoll,how do you explain the bullet hole in the windshield,many people saw that at Parkland ,and they claim it was from the front also.There was most likely more than one team of shooters.
nicenonya3 1 year ago
@nicenonya3 all I can say is that I've been studying this and interviewing people since 1973. my conclusions are outlined in my video. thanks for your comments, and I try to keep an open mind and not be too nutty like some of my fellow conspiracy buffs
vydeoynkhorne 1 year ago
@vydeoynkhorne May I suggest burning the Warren omission report,it's based on lies,,they wanted to put all "three" shots from the 6th floor and Oswald.Even Grerry Ford admits that the back wound was altered.NOW WHY WOULD THEY ALTER THE WOUND??? IF THAT DOESN'T TELL YOU SOMETHING,I GIVE UP>>..
nicenonya3 1 year ago
@nicenonya3 James Files' story matches up pretty well with the real witnesses on the grassy knoll, including Ed Bowers and Ed Hoffman.
nicenonya3 1 year ago
@nicenonya3 and I never said ozzie was the shooter
vydeoynkhorne 1 year ago
@vydeoynkhorne I didn't do the autopsy,but there was a hole in the windshield.
Jackie climbed onto the trunk to get a piece of skull and brain,she held it until after they got to Parkland.
try doing some research before making some stupid video.
nicenonya3 11 months ago
the Parkland doctors tell the truth,the cover up came from the Bethesda doctors and Warren omission .
nicenonya3 11 months ago
@nicenonya3 The evidence does not support your theory. FAIL!
GOODY61 11 months ago
Comment removed
nicenonya3 1 year ago
Search youtube video: JFK Assassination Storm Drain Shooter Theory Debunked.
Then search youtube video: JFK Zapruder Film Closeup. WATCH IT.
Don't you find it very disturbing Jacqueline NEVER comforts her husband. Why does she just stare at Gov. Connally all the time?. She failed on both accounts to comfort & get JFK out of the firing line or flag down any agent.
The temple explosion is actually the exit wound fired from the left side of his head. His head?. BACK & TO THE LEFT.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
the goverment knows who did it. they have files and stuff about it that keep secret cause all the presidents up till now have signed to keep it secret.
makethemXearnit1 1 year ago
Rockin good news!
malkooth 1 year ago
JFK got thrown back and to the left indicating a shot not from behind, but from the front right. I think they either had a shooter on the grassy knoll or in the storm drain. And the driver was in on it because he slowed down to almost a complete stop like a piece of shit.
MassacreBlast 1 year ago
@MassacreBlast
no from behind, it was the brainmatter getting compressed & forced out of the side of his head, this made his head recoil the way it did, back & to the left!!
grettoz 1 year ago
@MassacreBlast, Fail for the knoll & storm drain.
There would have been a bullet exit wound somewhere on the left side of JFK's head if the shot came from the Knoll or storm drain, which wasn't the case.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta the storm drain was on the right side of the street right past the sign. and getting shot from that angle is very logical. your head wont jerk back that hard or at all getting shot from behind. it woud go forward before it came back.
makethemXearnit1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta you can watch it over and over again her hands are both down by her no where does it show a hand come behind his head or in front of his head. and if he go shot from behind the impact of the bullet wouldnt blow the front of his head like it did. the storm drain is tough but its possible and not to mention the skin and everything blowing back like that,his head jerking back so hard. that the shot could have been close like governor connally did it. he had the angle. but idk
makethemXearnit1 1 year ago
is the downward angle really that steep by the triple underpass? how would james tague have gotten injured!
xenomann442 1 year ago
@xenomann442 the triple underpass portion is "not to scale" sorry, I couldn't frame the car and the overpass with any detail if the proportions were actual, so I compressed them. robert groden made the same observation that you had
vydeoynkhorne 1 year ago
I believe in a sniper in the 3rd floor of the Dal-Tex building, and a sniper in the storm drain in front of the car.
This video makes a lot of sense too.
But there's no way anyone will know. The shooters themselves don't even know who killed Kennedy. the Zapruder and Dorman films were altered. Everyone reports shots from different places, people were impersonating secret service all over the place that day. Definitely a conspiracy, but no one will know who exactly did it.
xenomann442 1 year ago
This video has so many things wrong with it. First of all, in the "scope" view of oswald, that is nowhere near the angle of where the first shot was fired. Second of all, a bullet could easily go through the governor's seat, and third of all, the skull analysis is completely wrong. Most people know that the exit wound is usually greater than the entrance in a high caliber rifle. It entered kennedy's skull at an angle, then blew the top front of his skull out. Nuff said.
silverdumper 1 year ago
What happened to the trunk weapon video??
SharkN5I50 1 year ago
the video? it runs ok to me, or did you mean the weapon? that I don't know...probably removed on the c130 flight back to dc
vydeoynkhorne 1 year ago
the security sucks.
MrlhOise 2 years ago
This video infers suttle , mysterious , thingamajig wit da trunk ?
SS puts bubble top put on for flight (preservation of crime scene evidence) to DC , then photographed & bullet fragments recovered (forward compartments) .
When the FBI burned the tosty Hosty note calls immediately go out for it's disbandment . When it does it's job properly , JFK Conspiracy Do-Gooders repay them w/a 'Big whopper' !
This video proves that all the good shooting locations had already been taken .
cdddraftsman 2 years ago
cdddraftsman 2 years ago
This video contains many misleading factoids BTW .
Tests done with ballistic gell simulating human fleash proves bullets don't follow a straight line when going through people , especially two people . They can change course after entering and change course again after exiting .
cdddraftsman 2 years ago
I shot JFK i was hiding in the glove compartment i am a small nija PROVE ME WRONG I DARE YOU!!! hahahahaha
bainy1990 2 years ago
yes, I heard there was a theory that michael jacksons other glove was involved and that is why it has never been seen...and he did like small ninjas, so there you are, QED
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
In the end, the JFK of history is hardly a man who needed to be removed from office by shadowy, nameless forces from w/in the USG . The notion that these nebuolous anti-Progressive plotters acted in order to bring in the domestic liberal agenda of LBJ & were able to get Chief Justice Earl Warren & the man who would not let Ernesto Miranda go to jail because a police officer forgot to read him his rights, to be a willing part of the overall scheme, is simply idiotic.
cdddraftsman 2 years ago
hey, haven't heard from you for a while - how are things?
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
All things considered , I'm usually intolerable , quick with a rebuttle , stinging criticism of stewpidity when I hear it , other than that , I'm in a extra shitty mood most of the time :-)
cdddraftsman 2 years ago
i just realized I don't get a notice to the reply to the reply...good to see you are your same encouraging self!!
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
oh my..i had never seen a vid that shows the second shot in fact i didnt know he got shot twice..his wife even if she was behind all this..she should freaked out!! that was terrible
TheGREEKpaladin 2 years ago
Watch "JFK: Beyond the Magic Bullet" on the discovery channel. It wasnt really a magic bullet at all. I believed conspiracy till i watched this. It explains how Oswald could have done this with 3 bullets, with evidence to back it up.
joosh1500 2 years ago
watch my video "way way beyond the magic bullet" and see where they goofed up
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
this video is all bullsh*t because first of all the others are in the wrong position of the real scene!!!
plus many othe rreasons
addvanced 2 years ago
"the wrong position of the real scene"
not sure what this means
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
very interesting thesis, but for my opinion it is abit fetched too far ;)
Too James Bond-like for my taste, but the way you explained all this is quite convincing. Good job.
DoubleR666 2 years ago
You state that the shot had to come from below that hit JFK in the back of the head. NO shot hit JFK in the back of the head, it was the back part of the right ear and then the massive exit wound in the back of the head.
David Lifton Explains the altered wound in the top front of JFK's head, a crude attempt to justify the conclusion a shot was from behind.
Plus the acoustic evidence shows us where all the shots were from.
Jackie was on trunk to get jFK's head part blown out the back.
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago
that's the distinction he is trying to make, that the skull info shown was wrong, that reports say that there was broken skull at the top of the head, not the right side of the ear... listen to what he says at the start
Diabolous3x 2 years ago
watch the video again and see around 3:58 - the zapruder film cleary shows the matter from kennedy's head blowing up and forward, not toward the trunk
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
The Z film was faked for two major reasons:
1. To hide the shot to JFK's head which blew a massive wound in the back of JFK's head
2. Hide the shot to Connally's back at Z325.
The last two shots is shown in;
watch?v=oBpHSyuueMU
The alteration of the Z film is covered in the link but the author didn't understand WHY it was altered.
watch?v=w-rcdBNFnGs
SCGATOR2001 2 years ago 2
if the PARTY of people whom plotted this assassination exist,..than more than likely they still congregate and if so more than likely have plotted other evil doings? do we know of any?
evolawonder 2 years ago
Try this. Try using those same ideas, but use the Dal-Tex as the origin of the shots as opposed to a concealed weapon on the trunk of the car. I'm just as curious about this as you are and I really like your idea. It certainly makes sense.
hogger129 2 years ago
That's a very interesting point you make. The headshot going through Kennedy's head and hitting Connally. But the problem is, the entry wound is above the right temple as it is smaller. The exit is in the back of Kennedy's head as it is bigger.
As for the concealed weapon theory, yeah it make sense. But idk. Is there much evidence to support it?
Once again, very well thought out video. I like your reasoning. But can you show me more evidence?
hogger129 2 years ago
I don't know much about a concealed weapon near the trunk. I suppose it's always a possibility. Hasn't yet been ruled out. But I think the shot that hit Kennedy in the back and continued into Connally's right armpit came out of the Dal-Tex Building. Oswald never fired that shot. It's the wrong angle. I don't think the headshot came from the Knoll, but there was a shooter there. I think the headshot came from in front. However, I do find your theory interesting.
hogger129 2 years ago
Really interestin, well done
mrchef111 2 years ago
I have to say I don't agree with your theory, but kudos for a very well done, professional video.
cyberwing777 2 years ago
thank you for watching. it's hard to swallow, but makes more sense than a grassy knoll shot
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
I was wondering if there was a way for me to download this video so I could use it. I will credit you. Thanks
KWEENo4 2 years ago
I guess it depends on your computer and if you can download. feel free to use this as you see fit, my compliments
mike brown
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
I am fan of guns. I don´t belive that low velocity gun can make this massive blow out of his skull.
Wound is so huge!! This can do hunter high velocity bullet only. BUT your theory is so impressive - it can be true (trunk can contain special CIA prepared gun with hih velocity ammo+high explosive bullet). Kennedy was squat - it is so weird - it looks like he knows will be shot and his wife was outside the buller trajectory-it seems to be planned.
Beautiful video!
postranni 2 years ago
thank you for watching, and thanks for your comments
pass it on
vydeoynkhorne 2 years ago
very interesting. thank you. the wound are very odds, the remote control gun is indeed a viable alternative. if i want to be absolutely sure of the outcome!!!! great video. thanx again.
marinduren69 3 years ago
gracie
chow
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
I am so tired of these JFK and other conspiracy theory videos. We all know that JFK was killed by the illuminait bankers for threatening to expose them. The mission was carried by the Luciferian C.I.A. But there is nothing we can do about it unless we revolt militarily. They might admit to it 100 years from now which is why G.W. Bush tried to pass a law that seals all government records for 100 years when a gov. official leaves office. They are so corrupt that it's disgusting. What will you do?
ResearchX 3 years ago
Yup!! this is it. This is how they did it. Bam!! Solved. lets tell everyone.
chucholetsm8one 3 years ago
very good
starbabe58 3 years ago
At 3.14 the angle is far to steep....if LHO was where alleged then there is every chance that the could have hit the two with the same bullet.
mickety2001 3 years ago
I refer you to my other video "way beyond beyond the magic bullet"
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
this video claims connolly was sitting directly in front of jfk,not true,in fact he was sitting in a fold down jump seat,slightly towards the centre of the limo and also a little lower than the seat jfk was on.this video is a bit of a stretch i think,grasping at straws.multible shots were fired by several assasins,some probably had some sort of a suppressor so many were not even heard.witnesses who report hearing more than 3 shots were told you are mistaken,cover up at the highest level.
eljamiro 3 years ago
obviously you didn't watch. typical
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
This has to be the most crackpot theory I've ever heard. This beats out the manhole assassin "idea" and the gem that one of the Secret Service Agents in the front seat fired the fatal shot. A round of Kool-Aid for all of you.
jaground65 3 years ago
the only crack pot theory is the discovery channel "beyond the magic bullet" and if you watch my rebuttal video "way beyond beyond the magic bullet" you can see that their video falsified the angles and in reality connally and jfk could not have been hit by the first shot alledgely fired by oswald
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
You know I agree with you, this theory is a bit ridiculous and the autopsy photos are doctored and the skull model is extremely inaacurate... but it's still more believable than the THEORY that Lee Harvey Oswald managed to kill the president on his own...
Ever read the FBI and CIA files on Oswald???
They knew where this guy was every second of his life...
The Warren Commission was a fraud along with the HSCA .
DavidAtleePhilips 3 years ago
No. I'm not completely ruling out the chance others were involved, but Washington is a town that leaks like a sieve. My late uncle was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for 25 years, and he read all of the Warren Commission materials. He became convinced both Oswald and Ruby acted alone. Truth is quite often stranger than fiction, and I'm leaning toward the conclusion of Gerald Posner's "Case Closed." Oswald missed with shot one, hit JFK & Connolly with shot two and killed JFK with shot three.
jaground65 3 years ago
pretty strange that.from when he defected and came back you can understand why they would be watching him,but before then,maybe he was being sheep dipped so as to look like a nut,a lone gunman nut with military training who chooses to use the worst rifle you could get for this assasination.would someone with military training use a carcano when he possibly could have used a much more accurate weapon,semi-auto,militaty type weapons that would be available in some states at that time.carcano=crap
eljamiro 3 years ago
Such bs You claim so many things and the video contradicts it. Also JFK and Connaly were virtually im a strait line away from LHO
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
This is the truth, I believe it
yogods 3 years ago
REMOTE CONTROLLED SHOT!?!?! LMFAO.
This is without a doubt the dumbest conspiracy video I have ever seen. Hahahaha!
Alright alright, so someone was hiding in the trunk? OK. So if there was someone in the trunk waiting to kill Kennedy or there was a "remote controlled gun".. why would they pull the trigger at that moment? The gun in the trunk theory is nothing but bullshit.
Kennedy was shot from the grass knoll area near the railroad tracks.
I think it was a cover up too, but COME ON!!
JDSabre 3 years ago
yeah,it is a bit much,also the narrator called diem nu,i think nu was diems brother,he got blown away as well.this remote control gun thing,i dont think so.i agree thier were assassins behind the fence on the grassy knoll,i also think thier were 2 or 3 more teams of assassins around dealy plaza.according to chancery holt he saw at least 6 world class assassins in and around dealy plaza that day.check out spooks,hoods & the hidden elite,you can google the whole video.very interesting.
eljamiro 3 years ago
Why would Jackie be "reaching for bits of brain and skull"? That, plus testing the gun by assassinating the Vietnamese guys didn't make sense. Otherwise a good video and perspective.
JRTJRTJRT 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So much for the Single Bullet MYTH and the charlatan that conjured it out of his ass:
watch?v=aS3zrdkoCdY
Oooops! Good luck explaining this away delusional Lone Nut Sheeple.
VinnyVoom444 3 years ago
look at the trunk at 1:41 i tell me if you see what i see
louisianahick2004 3 years ago
what do you see?
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
I noticed this b-4 I scrolled down to these comments.........look close u see a puff of smoke!!!!!!!
mestrejeb 3 years ago
SMOKE!!I saw it b-4 I read your comment........I was hoping i wasn't the only one!
mestrejeb 3 years ago
Nothing, what is it?
jazzyjonty 3 years ago
I see smoke!
yogods 3 years ago
I know what is goig on here. I'm no dummy you know. Andy Kaufman is not, in fact dead, he is masquerading as vydeoynkhorne!! I can swear that is Jerry Lawler doing the voice over! I knew you weren't dead Andy!! I knew it. The video was kinda good, but please tell me that you are you gonna do another Saturday Night Live? I just love your Elvis impersonation. Oh, Please say you will!
tetonclmbr 3 years ago
tank yu, oh, I mean "thank ya, thank ya very much, uh huh"
elvis
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
William Cooper claims it was the limo driver that fired the fatal shot to the head. He shows the full screen version and not the this zoomed in version of the Zabruder film. He also says the Warren Commission never saw the full screen Zabruder film.
lazydogs 3 years ago
William Cooper also claimed jackie was trying to get out of the limo in a panic,face facts cooper was an idiot & the shot came from the knoll.
a1g77luvvy 3 years ago
"William Cooper also claimed jackie was trying to get out of the limo in a panic"
He may have been right for once (Although he was a baffoon) she certainly wasn't picking up a peice of his brain thats for sure .
"the shot came from the knoll"
No evidence any shot came from the knoll . All fragments found in forward compartments .
Case closed .
cdddraftsman 3 years ago
Don't you think that one of the bystanders along the parade route would have noticed a gun popping up out of the trunk and firing and then returning to the trunk?
CADAZAN 3 years ago
the gun didn't pop up out of the trunk, it fired thru the antenna hole.
there was a report that one of the antennas had broken off on the way to the hospital
thanks
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
If you look at pictures of the limo at Parkland Hospital emergency entrance you will see that both antenna are in place in perfect condition.
CADAZAN 3 years ago
wrong...look at the video again. you will see part of the bubble top kit covering the right antenna. you can't tell if the antenna is intact or not.
in fact if you look at the photos of the car at the airport, the "suspect" antenna is bent and not straight up like the left side antenna.
vydeoynkhorne 3 years ago
Not such a bad theory, in fact easiest to perform.
bezvezeceda 4 years ago
you need to stop masturbating to oliver stone and william cooper in your grammas basementand do something more ambitious like try out this theory and blow out your own brains
Obelisk2290 4 years ago
I've never watched "JFK" and I am smart enough to realize the whole thing was a conspiracy.
K3vinK 4 years ago
vydeoynkhorne, please demonstrate that your theory is plausible.
Where was the hole in the trunk through which the bullet passed, and how large was it?
And how did they set this thing up without firing test shots, which would have put bullet holes in the trunk surface?
And if the hole was more than a few millimeters in diameter, why didn't anyone notice it - Clint Hill for example, who was on that trunk all the way to Parkland?
bobharris77 4 years ago
To align the hole, I think they would HAVE to have fired test shots. The alignment would have been extremely difficult
Very seriously, why don't you try to reproduce this weapon in an old car, perhaps at a local junkyard, and see if you can overcome those obstacles?
If you can't, then please tell us and remove this video.
bobharris77 4 years ago
Bob asks you to "remove the video." Oh god, Bob are you kidding!!! You (bob harris) have posted three separate assasination theories that are even more nutty than this one. When are you going to unblock me Bobbie and let me reply to your whacky videos anyway?
mag30th 4 years ago
sorry mag30th, the only thing more nutty is "beyond the magic bullet" showing the bullet emerging from jfk's sternum despite exact measurements and angles. if it came out his throat, then I'd be first to say "lone nut assassin"
valeriemalcolm 4 years ago
Beyond the magic bullet has a bullet exiting from JFK's sternum?
mag30th 4 years ago
my video demonstrates the plausibility. the hole is the diameter of a typical antennae hole, certainly large enough for a muzzle. and my video said they test fired it in vietnam. clint hill suffered from depression for many years, made few comments about the assassination (one to mike wallace) and could have been coerced into keeping his mouth shut.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
go play with your hot wheel cars in traffic
Obelisk2290 4 years ago
jfk was probably the only us president not run by the banking cartels, mafia etc :(
bigfluff73 4 years ago
How could something like that have been rigged in the trunk, without risking discovery by the Secret Service agents??
Or were they all in on it?
Was Clint Hill in on it?? Odd, for a guy who almost got himself run over and killed, trying to get to the President.
All the Bugliosi's and Posners of the world cannot do NEARLY the damage to the credibility of a JFK conspiracy, that conspiracy people can, publishing half-baked, goofy theories.
bobharris77 4 years ago
are you saying this is half baked? or completely baked?
I don't think hill was in on it. he said as he jumped on the trunk, "the shot sounded like a revolver in a barrel."
mike brown
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
Ok, I am looking at your vid at 1:20. A pistol is mounting inside the cylinder, right?
By your calculations, where was the hole drilled in the trunk lid to allow the bullet to pass? And what approximately, were the dimensions of the hole?
bobharris77 4 years ago
Also, looking again at 1:20, I see some kind of fabric or canvas hanging off the left tail light, that extends over the cylinder.
Have you confirmed that the purpose of the cylinder is not to hold that tarp?
And finally, how did the killers insure that an innocent agent or cop, wouldn't see this thing, or the hole in the trunk, and ask, WTF is this??
bobharris77 4 years ago
if this took place as I claim in the video, at least one ss agent knew. I have been unable to confirm what purpose the cylinder was. Robert Groeden believes it to be an airconditioner for the passenger compartment. hess and eisenhardt (the company that modified the car, never returned my inquiries.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
Also, the entry wound in the back, which was about 4 inches below the neckline, was (contrary to popular myths), still well ABOVE the neck wound.
Take any photo of JFK, in profile and draw a line from that point, through the base of the neck and you will see what I mean.
Cosmosity 4 years ago
An intact bullet was found in Connally's left thigh - not a fragment.
How could a bullet on a rising trajectory have dropped downward Kennedy's neck, to below JBC's armpit?
Cosmosity 4 years ago
an intact bullet was "found" on a stretcher, not in connally's thigh.
in my video, I show the only moment connally's armpit is not covered by the jump seat back. it's at frame 312. I sincerely believe a fragment hit him then
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
Connally was hit by an intact bullet. The entry wound in his back was large and elongated. And the bullet deposited particles in his wrist, which could only have come from the inside of a whole bullet.
Cosmosity 4 years ago
this video has changed everything I thought I knew about the Kennedy assassination.. thank you
TitoDaMan 4 years ago
you are welcome, thank you!
mike brown
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
well im really really confused about the angle of dangle......one proves Oswald killed JFK...other proves there were atleast 3 shooters.....and also something abt magic bullets.....now comes concealed weapons at back of the trunk of the limo.....which is operated by remote control.....well i dunno wat to believe.......anyways nice vids...
anginoma 4 years ago
Interesting!
DimondR 4 years ago
Possible that conceal weapons was used from ANY place.
torpedodropkick 4 years ago
but the cloud analogy is poetic...reminds me of the michelangelo antononi film where the photographer sees imagery in the prints he makes of an assassination..."blow up"
I have been accused of an over active imagination
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
thirty years of research makes me a firm believer
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
watch it again...when jfk's head explodes one of the pieces hits connally and this is the only time connally's back is exposed
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
Wow Mike, How long to do this? And the pictures, I've never, ever sen anything like those. Great job. Steve
StephenPeace 4 years ago
I've been researching this and gathering pix since 1972
thanks
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
i can see your way of thinking about this, but i dont see it working. all the doctors at parklands hospital cannot be wrong when saying the exit wound was on the back of his head! the windscreen had a full hole in it and was replaced while he was at the hospital according to several witnesses.
ions girl there was NO overwhelming evidence incriminating oswald. it was all coincidental, that is why he had to die before trial, they could NOT convict him
nuwuck 4 years ago
That is complete rubbish and shows you have not really looked into this case whatsoever. Your claim about the windshield is entirely wrong - there was no hole. There was a crack. And thorough tests were conducted on that crack to show that it was struck by a projectile from the inside. Those tests were NOT done at the hospital. Show me one citation from a witness that supports what you said.
VegasVentura 4 years ago
nuwuck, you need to read the Warren Report, and in particular, the testimony of the doctors. What was actually said by the emergency doctors trying to save Kennedy's life to the Warren Commission and what has been said since vary considerably. By their own admission, the head wound was barely looked at and again by their admission, JFK was on his back - giving the impression of a rear wound on the head. It is the authenticated autopsy photos, x-rays and testimony that are of vital importance.
VegasVentura 4 years ago
As far as your claim that the evidence against LHO was coincidental (did you mean "circumstantial"?), I've sent you an email as there's too much to list here. Do me a favour after you read it, reply with all the hard, credible, physical evidence that supports a shooter OTHER than Oswald
VegasVentura 4 years ago
To : All - In any post investigation that proposes a different solution 2 1 that was agreed 2 upon in the WCR has 2 use the scientific method 2 replace the agreed upon conclusion (SBT) . This means that not only do U have 2 disprove the SBT but U have 2 prove that it couldn't of happened any other way . This is the agreed upon way of disproving a accepted norm . It's up 2 the advocate & his superabnormal position 2 take the lead & wrest it out of the hands of the accepted position .
cdddraftsman 4 years ago
I thought I did that with my video.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
To : vydeoynkhorne "I thought I did that with my video"
Well ....? That's open 2 interpretation . U still have 2 explain how JFK's lung was bruised & how the tract of damage from back 2 front @ a downward angle coresponds w/ your upward angle shot . I just have a hard time picturing that .
cdddraftsman 4 years ago
Ok, there have been some absolute rippers regarding conspiracy assassination theory - but this one takes the cake! I am utterly astounded that so much effort it literally wasted on this when the OVERWHELMING WEIGHT OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE points to Lee Harvey Oswald as the LONE killer. This video is interesting (to say the least!) but it's typical conspiracy agenda - your apparent "proof" is in the questions you raise - not the answers you provide. This provides none.
VegasVentura 4 years ago
try putting the entry and exit wounds on a friend, then place them in a car seat similar to the limo seat. then tell me what trajectory you come up with.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
But the bullet entry wounds line up with shots fired from the Depository's 6th floor. One of the greatest tricks you pull in this video is the way you manipulte the angles to suit your theory. Have you ever looked at Dale Myers' 3D analysis of Dealey Plaza and the bullet trajectories? It lines up a whole lot better - but more importantly, it corroborrates the physical evidence in the case
VegasVentura 4 years ago
I discussed this with dale myers. he said "I used the entry in connally and the exit in kennedy to point back to the depository window." exact quote.
I said why didn't you use jfk's wounds or just connally's. he said he didn't know jfk's exact entry.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
in short, he supposed the two angles were the same. a big lie. do the trajectories yourself. don't believe false "facts"
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
How do you know it was "a big lie"? Where is your proof? Just saying the words "big lie" doesn't make it so. Also, your film has some crucial errors that will confuse the average viewer. Your "Depository View" through the scope is not right and needs to be corrected.
VegasVentura 4 years ago
yeah, the "tague" shot is "not to scale" and robert groden blasted me for that too.
but the scope shot is correct. it is prior to the tree,
and indicates when the first shot was heard.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
But the first shot is unlikely to have been the one that passed through both Kennedy and Connolly....it's the second
VegasVentura 4 years ago
explain how the top of jfk's head is blown open.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
In 500 words? Ok, I'll try. The bullet entered the back of his head at around 2000 ft/sec and broke apart. The fragments exited. The kinetic energy that the bullet imparted on the inside of the head as it was slowed by the brain tissue caused a massive build-up of pressure. This pressure was released in the graphic fashion seen in the Z-Film. But from a purely physics POV, the explosion didn't really need to be on the right side of the head - it could have been anywhere
VegasVentura 4 years ago
1/2
To : VegasVentura "massive build-up of pressure"
Your right "VegasVentura" Bravo ! Good to see someone uses his brain around this conspiracy coo coo clock prison ! The technical name for the force that builds up behind the bullet is called a 'temporal cavity' and is indeed what caused JFK's brain to be ejected out the right side of his head .
cdddraftsman 4 years ago
Don't believe false facts? That's what I'm doing! You haven't actually provided any solid proof that there was a gun in the trunk. It's all been speculation and attempts at discrediting the Warren Report findings - standard tactic. So then, how do you account for the all the physical evidence pointing to Oswald (shell casings, bullets etc), witness testimony confirming him as the shooter and the fact that NOT ONE witness interviewed by the WC has EVER reported the shots coming from the trunk?
VegasVentura 4 years ago
clint hill, climbing on the trunk had the thought:
the last shot sounded like a revolver firing into a barrel."
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
Interesting - but hardly proof. If he had said, "I saw a gun barrel sticking up out of the trunk" we'd be having a different discussion
VegasVentura 4 years ago
2/2
For more info : > karws dot gso dot uri dot edu /jfk/jfk dot html > Scientific Topics > Wound Ballistis > How a high-speed bullet damages an organ . It's a eye opener by one of the U.S.'s foremost authorities on the subject, Dr. Vincent J. M. Di Maio . Then see Prof. Rahn's Monograph length treatise on the subject .
cdddraftsman 4 years ago
What a breath of fresh air to see someone else has actually put some time into reading the info on Ken Rahn's site. In my opinion, from a scientific standpoint, the info on that website is the best I have seen. Larry Sturdivan's book (which is mentioned on that site) is also well worth the read for a comprehensive understanding of wound ballistics
VegasVentura 4 years ago
can you re post the correct link please - I'd like to see this.
jazzyjonty 3 years ago
Got one other thing to say about a section of the video dealing with the splice in the Z-Film and the narration asking the question whether or not that splice hides a puff of smoke....there are other films (Nix, Muchmore etc) as well as the Moorman photo that are good at establishing the absurdity of this claim
VegasVentura 4 years ago
shows how little you really know. camera shooting angles and light reflectivity can affect how a puff of smoke is photographed. the zap film is 180 degrees different from the muchmore/nix films. even the head burst is barely visible from the muchmore/nix yet is clearly visible in the zap film
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
To : vydeoynkhorne "shows how little you really"
The muchmore/nix films were shot on the opposite side of JFK's head . Nix did not use the adjusting lens that came with the camera for that type of indoor film . (See Disc. Chann. Unsolved History JFK : Death in Dealy Plaza)Je would of also got a good shot of the grassy knoll during the shooting but he muffed it and tryed to compensate by telling story's of a grassy knoll shooter .
cdddraftsman 4 years ago
Can I ask you this... Are you stating that it is your conclusive opinion that there was a concealed gun in the trunk of the limo that delivered the fatal head shot? So besides fiddling with trajectories and citing grainy footage that doesn't actually show a gun, how then do you account for the evidence against Oswald (bullets matching casings matching a rifle etc)? You do agree that the burden of proof is on you here (I hope)
VegasVentura 4 years ago
I never said ozzie was innocent. his declaration "I'm a patsy" could have meant that he was just firing in the air...part of some "draw attention to cuba" thing.
can you honestly say that the throat shot was a perfect angle up to ozzie? have you plotted the autopsy pics on a stand-in to verify this, or do you accept dale myers stiff drawings? he did a nice animation though!
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
I saw your email and I have done the stand-in (both in the past and again now). The problem is that it is so subjective. A slight movement creates a flow-on effect that is massive. We don't have the actual car, the actual conditions etc. This is why the best evidence is the physical evidence - Oswald's rifle, Oswald's bullets - fired by Oswald.
VegasVentura 4 years ago
why did oswald have gun residue on his hands but not his face? to aim a rifle effectivley it needs to be near your face. secret service were alone with oswalds body in the funeral parlour.. is it inconceivable that they placed his palm print on the weapon there
nuwuck 4 years ago
It's not inconceivable at all...but until you have proof, it's a pointless avenue to pursue. Also, what is your basis for claiming the gun residue on LHO? The paraffin tests conducted by the FBI? You really should research that a little more. That test was and is considered one of the least effective, eg, for comparison, 20 random people were paraffin tested...the test showed that 10 had fired guns. Says it all.
VegasVentura 4 years ago
Also, if the SS were with LHO and were being subversive, why did they do only half a job. If they were there to frame him, why not ensure that gun residue patterns were perfect (ie, all over his face and hands) thus leaving no questions to ever be raised?
VegasVentura 4 years ago
that's concievable - but do palm prints and or fingerprint patterns on the hands degrade after death with tissue breakdown?
jazzyjonty 3 years ago
"but do palm prints & or fingerprint patterns on the hands degrade after death w/tissue breakdown?"
Has nothing to do w/that. Fingerprints are left because while people are alive they excrete a thin film of 'grease' or 'body oil' out of there pores . After death this exaporates very quikly and it's no longer possible to obtain fingerprints w/out using whats used when fingerprinting suspects . Another bold faced lie told by CTer's who piss on the memory of JFK while lying for self glory & $ .
cdddraftsman 3 years ago
"regarding smoke from bullets, haven't makers moved on from cordite and established smokeless ammunition by then or...?"
In 1884 Paul Vieille invented a smokeless gunpowder called Poudre B . Modern ammunition emits very little smoke . The proponents of a "Puff of smoke" from the knoll are pulling peoles legs .
cdddraftsman 3 years ago
Also, to clarify, I'm not saying Dale Myers is 1005 correct. However, the work he did in that animation by taking into account every aspect of Dealey Plaza that was possible to take into account based on the films is by far the most impressive piece of work. The fact that he lined up the shot using JFK's exit wound and Connolly's entrance is not a major issue as the physical evidence supports him doing this
VegasVentura 4 years ago
yet the physical evidence of ozzie's gun needs to match the evidence of the wounds. by saying the subjective view of the throat wound etc, you realize this indicates "reasonable doubt" that would have been seized on by the defense.
vydeoynkhorne 4 years ago
The subjective view is only MY subjective view. I'm not a criminal investigator. But throuhgout every piece of literature I've read and from my own experience, I find that the wounds DO match Oswald's gun and position - from doctor's testimony to autopsy photos to simulated recreations to witness testimony.
VegasVentura 4 years ago