In 1650, Archbishop Ussher published the Ussher chronology, a chronology dating the creation to the night preceding October 23 4004 BC. Ussher's proposed date of 4004 BC differed little from other Biblically-based estimates, such as those of Bede (3952 BC), Ussher's near-contemporary, Scaliger (3949 BC), Johannes Kepler (3992 BC), Sir Isaac Newton (c. 4000 BC), or John Lightfoot (3929 BC).
Ararat Anomoaly? "linear facades in the glacial ice underlying more recently accumulated ice and snow". I know it's nice to believe you're going to heaven when you die, and if you want to believe that, it's up to you. But please don't tell me there is evidence for god when none exists, and please dont tell me that evolution did not happen when it did and does.
I am telling you the truth, but because you are prideful you do not listen yet you ask me questions and will not accept the answers.
If I were to list to you every single one of the scientific, historical, prophetic, medical, and archeological, evidences in the Bible you would be overwhelmed with this yet still you would contend against me and what I speak. This is your nature and I don't expect you to change it.
you don't have to list anything. i don't believe that god exists. you do. but how do you know you believe in the right god? are all muslims and hindu's wrong? were all the ancient greeks and romans wrong? can you not see how absurd religion is?
You speak the truth when you say that religion is absurd. For what man is saved through rituals and chants?
I know that my God and His word are truth because He has spoken prophecy, science, medicine, history, astronomy, and much more in the Word and not once has it fallen short of truth.
Really? Belief in a supernatural leader is religion, you are contradicting yourself. by the way, could you give me an example of a scientific fact which has been predicted by the bible?
if i could show you many cases where the bible is scientifically incorrect, what then would you say? For example, it is indicated in the bible that the world is flat. i believe that much of the language is metaphorical, and can not be used as evidence. if you do want to use it as evidence, you must accept my claim.
It is not indicated that it is flat, rather, spherical.
It is He who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers... - Isaiah 40:22
You are going to tell me that a circle is not a sphere, however, you have to look at the Hebrew word that was translated into "circle." That word is "khug," a word that is directly translated as "sphere."
Furthermore, Jesus Christ states that during his return, "Some will be sleeping, and others will be working," ->
As I've stated before, the internet, whether be it for or against the claims in the Bible, holds a stupid amount of bias to even be considered "credible."
Sorry, but your going to have to show me information that's well earned through your own research.
i find that comical as it's obvious to me you've just searched the web to find your quotes. it is easy to quote mine the bible to prove a point. that is the point i was trying to make. i can disprove as many as you can prove - they don't actually prove anything. the bible contains no science. science contains science.
If you would actually research what you are refuting, you would find that the very thing you refute is the very thing you support. Likewise, because you will not research such things, you will find nothing, and therefore, you refute what you do not know but what you do know is the very thing that you refute.
No. I believe in the entire Bible. It makes no sense for some parts to be truth and others to be false, especially when the obvious truths around us are evidence of God's truth. Yes, I believe in Adam, Eve, and the Ark.
You know that the story of the arc is impossible? how can you fit two of every species on a boat? then you have the problem of stopping them eating each other! don't forget the aquarium for all the fresh water fish (which also all have to be kept seperate). oh, and the fact it is genetically impossible for all life on earth to have come from one male and one female of each species. come on!
Do you not know that the ark was 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high? Or that Naval Engineers copy the arks design because of it's near perfect Buoyancy? Give animals more credit, their world is about to be flooded, I'm sure they had more important things to worry about then eating each other. As for the fish, they probably died. Those living today are probably adaptations of their former selves.
you've made two references to the process of evolution there. Of course no domestic breeds existed, they are the result of human forced evolution. the fish probably adapted? what do you think the process of evolution is? it is adaptation to new or changing environments. you can't say you believe everything in the bible, then excuse the holes in the story by using evolution! btw, the animals had more important things to worry about? you think a snake is intelligent enough to care? bye mice!
When you go to Alaska your cold for a while but eventually get used to it. You don't evolve, you simply adapt. There are no holes in the story but those that people put in them. That's what people are famous for, exaggeration and degeneration. The ark itself was over 3 stories tall, do you think Noah, a human, would not have separated them?
ok, so adaptation is responsible for turning fresh water fish into salt water fish! you're like a comedy act! adaptation is not the same as getting used to being cold. you clearly have a very limited understanding of science. also, how does one guy build a boat that big? out of wood i'm assuming? it's laughable.
i've never heard of an 18th century gallion that is capable of fitting 2 of ever species of animal in it. let alone being built by a small group of people. come on. can you not see how far fetched this is?
no, i think it would take a hundred years for one family to chop down then collect the wood from enough trees to make a boat that big! please think about what you are saying!
People did not live longer, where do you get this stuff from?! Like i've said before, i don't believe in things for which there is no evidence, just because other people do. there is NO evidence to support this story, christians have been searching for the arc for years and found nothing. it never existed! Please look at the evidence, and don't just believe what you've been told/ read in the bible.
What I've been told throughout the years is that man evolved from a fish. That fish turned into a cat-like creature, which in turn, turned into a primate and then into a 22 year old boy named AlexanderMBlade. Is there evidence supporting this? No.
But I do say this, that you research "Ararat Anomaly."
you're saying that a lump of ice in a glacier proves that noah and his family built an ark, filled it with over 2.5 billion amimals, survived a flood that covered the entire planet and then had incest with each other in order to restart the human race?
o_O Noah had three sons, all three of whom had a wife each,each of whom bore Noa'hs sons several children. Understand the scriptures and see where your argument stands.
@Strikesnake1994 Pretty much. The reason being is that the genetic line was still "pure," and not as broken down as it is today, thus, the negative results prouced by "incest," didn't exist as it does today. At least not until the time of the book of Leviticus when the practice was prohibited. Nevertheless, read the scriptures and understand.
@AlexanderMBlade If we all came from one family then why are black people, white people, Asian people, red people and Latinos? Evolution doesn't work THAT fast.
1:08 .....bullshit
CRUSH3Rdlux 1 year ago
@CRUSH3Rdlux
o_O
AlexanderMBlade 8 months ago
Has the bible said anything about dinosaurs? I can't fine one statement that at least insinuated that.
mjay22 2 years ago
@mjay22 Yes, yes it has.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
In 1650, Archbishop Ussher published the Ussher chronology, a chronology dating the creation to the night preceding October 23 4004 BC. Ussher's proposed date of 4004 BC differed little from other Biblically-based estimates, such as those of Bede (3952 BC), Ussher's near-contemporary, Scaliger (3949 BC), Johannes Kepler (3992 BC), Sir Isaac Newton (c. 4000 BC), or John Lightfoot (3929 BC).
so, simply atheists making it up?
Strikesnake1994 2 years ago
@Strikesnake1994 What, exactly, are you trying to say???
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
Ararat Anomoaly? "linear facades in the glacial ice underlying more recently accumulated ice and snow". I know it's nice to believe you're going to heaven when you die, and if you want to believe that, it's up to you. But please don't tell me there is evidence for god when none exists, and please dont tell me that evolution did not happen when it did and does.
thisissick22 2 years ago
I am telling you the truth, but because you are prideful you do not listen yet you ask me questions and will not accept the answers.
If I were to list to you every single one of the scientific, historical, prophetic, medical, and archeological, evidences in the Bible you would be overwhelmed with this yet still you would contend against me and what I speak. This is your nature and I don't expect you to change it.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
you don't have to list anything. i don't believe that god exists. you do. but how do you know you believe in the right god? are all muslims and hindu's wrong? were all the ancient greeks and romans wrong? can you not see how absurd religion is?
thisissick22 2 years ago
You speak the truth when you say that religion is absurd. For what man is saved through rituals and chants?
I know that my God and His word are truth because He has spoken prophecy, science, medicine, history, astronomy, and much more in the Word and not once has it fallen short of truth.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
Really? Belief in a supernatural leader is religion, you are contradicting yourself. by the way, could you give me an example of a scientific fact which has been predicted by the bible?
thisissick22 2 years ago
In technical terms, yes.
Religion, however, is much more then just belief. It's a series of rituals and actions a person HAS TO abide by.
Here's a scientific fact predicted in the Bible: The water cycle.
Here's another in case you still don't believe: Earth's rotation around the sun.
And a third: Pi.
There are several more.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
ok, could you quote me the parts which make these predictions?
thisissick22 2 years ago
- Water Cycle Job 26:8, Job 36:27-28, Eccl 1:6-7; 11:3; Amos 9:6.
-Pi: 1 Kings 7:23
I would write out the entire passages but I think your more then capable of looking them up.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
if i could show you many cases where the bible is scientifically incorrect, what then would you say? For example, it is indicated in the bible that the world is flat. i believe that much of the language is metaphorical, and can not be used as evidence. if you do want to use it as evidence, you must accept my claim.
thisissick22 2 years ago
It is not indicated that it is flat, rather, spherical.
It is He who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers... - Isaiah 40:22
You are going to tell me that a circle is not a sphere, however, you have to look at the Hebrew word that was translated into "circle." That word is "khug," a word that is directly translated as "sphere."
Furthermore, Jesus Christ states that during his return, "Some will be sleeping, and others will be working," ->
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
Speaking about the rotation of the earth.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
/watch?v=0jfJraxj95k
thisissick22 2 years ago
Are you serious?
As I've stated before, the internet, whether be it for or against the claims in the Bible, holds a stupid amount of bias to even be considered "credible."
Sorry, but your going to have to show me information that's well earned through your own research.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
i find that comical as it's obvious to me you've just searched the web to find your quotes. it is easy to quote mine the bible to prove a point. that is the point i was trying to make. i can disprove as many as you can prove - they don't actually prove anything. the bible contains no science. science contains science.
thisissick22 2 years ago
If you would actually research what you are refuting, you would find that the very thing you refute is the very thing you support. Likewise, because you will not research such things, you will find nothing, and therefore, you refute what you do not know but what you do know is the very thing that you refute.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
thankyou for proving my point. i will go around in circles forever with you. you have already made your mind up.
thisissick22 2 years ago
You are welcome.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
so you choose to believe some parts of the bible and not others? do you believe the story of adam and eve? what about noahs ark?
thisissick22 2 years ago
No. I believe in the entire Bible. It makes no sense for some parts to be truth and others to be false, especially when the obvious truths around us are evidence of God's truth. Yes, I believe in Adam, Eve, and the Ark.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
You know that the story of the arc is impossible? how can you fit two of every species on a boat? then you have the problem of stopping them eating each other! don't forget the aquarium for all the fresh water fish (which also all have to be kept seperate). oh, and the fact it is genetically impossible for all life on earth to have come from one male and one female of each species. come on!
thisissick22 2 years ago
Were there Saint Bernards in Noah's time?
Likewise, the Bulldog?
Do you not know that the ark was 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high? Or that Naval Engineers copy the arks design because of it's near perfect Buoyancy? Give animals more credit, their world is about to be flooded, I'm sure they had more important things to worry about then eating each other. As for the fish, they probably died. Those living today are probably adaptations of their former selves.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
you've made two references to the process of evolution there. Of course no domestic breeds existed, they are the result of human forced evolution. the fish probably adapted? what do you think the process of evolution is? it is adaptation to new or changing environments. you can't say you believe everything in the bible, then excuse the holes in the story by using evolution! btw, the animals had more important things to worry about? you think a snake is intelligent enough to care? bye mice!
thisissick22 2 years ago
Did I? Adaptation is not the same as evolution.
When you go to Alaska your cold for a while but eventually get used to it. You don't evolve, you simply adapt. There are no holes in the story but those that people put in them. That's what people are famous for, exaggeration and degeneration. The ark itself was over 3 stories tall, do you think Noah, a human, would not have separated them?
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
ok, so adaptation is responsible for turning fresh water fish into salt water fish! you're like a comedy act! adaptation is not the same as getting used to being cold. you clearly have a very limited understanding of science. also, how does one guy build a boat that big? out of wood i'm assuming? it's laughable.
thisissick22 2 years ago
Gopher wood. Not 1 guy, but 1 guy, his three sons, their wives, and his wife.
If your saying boats cant be made of wood then go take a look at an 18th century galleon.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
i've never heard of an 18th century gallion that is capable of fitting 2 of ever species of animal in it. let alone being built by a small group of people. come on. can you not see how far fetched this is?
thisissick22 2 years ago
No, but it made of wood is it not?
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
no, i think it would take a hundred years for one family to chop down then collect the wood from enough trees to make a boat that big! please think about what you are saying!
thisissick22 2 years ago
Perhaps it did. After all, people lived longer in those days and God did wait for Noah to finish building the Ark to bring forth the flood.
Why do you contend against these words? Is there not more to this world then simply what we can see?
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
People did not live longer, where do you get this stuff from?! Like i've said before, i don't believe in things for which there is no evidence, just because other people do. there is NO evidence to support this story, christians have been searching for the arc for years and found nothing. it never existed! Please look at the evidence, and don't just believe what you've been told/ read in the bible.
thisissick22 2 years ago
What I've been told throughout the years is that man evolved from a fish. That fish turned into a cat-like creature, which in turn, turned into a primate and then into a 22 year old boy named AlexanderMBlade. Is there evidence supporting this? No.
But I do say this, that you research "Ararat Anomaly."
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
you must be joking.
you're saying that a lump of ice in a glacier proves that noah and his family built an ark, filled it with over 2.5 billion amimals, survived a flood that covered the entire planet and then had incest with each other in order to restart the human race?
one or two problems there.
Strikesnake1994 2 years ago
o_O Noah had three sons, all three of whom had a wife each,each of whom bore Noa'hs sons several children. Understand the scriptures and see where your argument stands.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
that still means that everyone had to have sex with their cousins.
unless you are a redneck down in alabama, that still means incest.
or would you like to shag your cousin?
Strikesnake1994 2 years ago
@Strikesnake1994 Pretty much. The reason being is that the genetic line was still "pure," and not as broken down as it is today, thus, the negative results prouced by "incest," didn't exist as it does today. At least not until the time of the book of Leviticus when the practice was prohibited. Nevertheless, read the scriptures and understand.
AlexanderMBlade 2 years ago
@AlexanderMBlade If we all came from one family then why are black people, white people, Asian people, red people and Latinos? Evolution doesn't work THAT fast.
IKillBabyKittensLOL 2 months ago in playlist More videos from AlexanderMBlade
O.o
freaky0chick 3 years ago
o_O
AlexanderMBlade 3 years ago
LOL
Good Video!
freaky0chick 3 years ago
lol, thank you.
AlexanderMBlade 3 years ago