Added: 8 months ago
From: maggiemoline
Views: 14,537
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i tried watching the real first 9/11 conspiracy videos and it was blocked my youtube, for what?

  • impossible to believe that the MOST video surveillanced building in all the world ( The Pentagon) has No video of what hit the building

  • @MasterMark123 Or none that they want you to see?

  • Maybe USA 2008 Hurricane Ike was natures way to speak out about 9-11. Ike made US land 9-13, and that is almost 9-11 of Bush's last 2008 year, and went to Houston, Texas ( NASA HQ ). But there was enough wind force on 9-11-2008 to begin it's wind land damage. The WTC aircraft are associated with much wind power, which produced a lot of Cain in a big hurry at the WTC during Bush's first year. Pres Ike should have told us how to protect ourselves from the Mil Industial Complex&not just watch it.

  • These experiments are ludicrous. The wings either leave a mark on the building or are clipped and would be found among the derbies.

  • I got a question for everyone to answer about an aircraft flying close to the ground at 582 mph maintain speed and control of the plain that low and hit the pentagon without crashing into the ground? If they say the airplane has to reach a certain altitude to reach a certain speed?

  • @Motionstroker it's true the  lower altitude the heavy the object the slower the speed as friction kicks in as the heavy object attempts speed, total BS

  • These buildings did not only collapse becouse of the fire A FRICKING AIRCRAFT HIT THEM! You can hear ppl talk about how they tought the towers were tipping over image how much dmg that did to the core!

  • @Runarmeddenlilastave people also heard explosions moments before they collapsed,do a little research before you leave retarded comments!

  • @Runarmeddenlilastave The towers were designed to take the impact of aircraft hitting them ..... Building 7 had no plane hit it at all and it fell into it's own footprint as well . Never before in all history has a steel tower fallen due to fire and here we have THREE towers fall because of said FIRE .. BullSh*t

  • @MasterMark123

    Well if your so sure of it give plenty of images showing the southern side of WTC 7 "the side facing the north tower" and tell me that the damage made from the falling tower "north tower" did not cause WTC 7 to collapse!

  • See Harrit's analysis of WTC dust samples collected from around Manhattan immediately after 9-11-2001.Old patent thermite was augmented by a nanothermate re triggering. The proportionally high nanothermate content is explainable by an inefficient application. Much unburnt material was recovered. The thermite was mostly sprayed on with directional charges to compliment the post/steel panel assemblies put on during construction.Thermite requires magnesium tapes to ignite, in practice. Nanothermate

  • See Harrit's analyof WTC ples collected from around Manhattan. Old patent th was augmented by a nanothermateiggering. The proportionally high nanotherms inefficient applied, so much idenble un burnt materil was recovered. The thermite was sprayee on and complimented with ddirectional charges during construction. Thermite requires a very high temperature to detonate.Magnesium tape, lit by a butane lighter or electrical impulse would ignite the magnesium, which sets off conventional thermite.

  • For more information look up 911 missing links

  • I can't help noticing the fluctuation in the insurance premium on the WTC complex, so far today its gone from $15 000 000 to $3.5 000 000 000 in three stories. Thats some inflation problem you have!.

  • masonry building at 30 : 25 referring to pentagon

  • bush THE scum,was the perfect inside puppet.

  • This video is a counterattack against the truth. buildings DOESN'T go down STRAIGHT by itself ! Certainly not 2 long towers ! And Building 7 that stood too far away and did collapsed ? What about the buildings between building 7 and the towers ?

    Those "terrorists" could not have put explosifs but insiders could ! Ask the brother of Bush that went inside before the drama ! What about the NO-commercial plane that crashed into a tower ? What about the dissapeared plane and all the passengers ?

  • war is a business  !

  • @1minotm1 Wrong -----> War is BIG BUSINESS

  • You know, I can't say for sure that this was an inside job planned put by our government, but goddammit all if Bush wasn't aware of what was going on in the world and all the hostility between countries. He let it happen. I was only eleven years old when it happened and the images I saw that day are still burned into my brain. I hope for all the families affected by this, that the get the answers they are looking for before they join their loved ones on the other side. I really, really do.

  • I really still hold on to the hope that we didn't do this to our selves but we humans do do some sick sick things to each other I just don't get why fuck money why ???????

  • Murder, insurance fraud, victims who are still alive, cashing in on the misfortune of others. Why are people not screaming for justice or is the media not reporting it? Of course, the media is in on it since all major statoins are owned by the same fks. I feel almost better than I know the towers were pretty much empty. But I wonder about the jumpers - they were real or was that fake too...goddam it, who the F do they think they are. Rich spoiled brats are leading the world.

  • @califradmt the jumpers were real. i can promise you that.

  • Youtube refuses to let me share this with my contacts. Anyone else facing the same problem?

  • Even this video missed important facts No 1: ALL of the Bin Laden videos are fakes with doctored audio and fake actors pretending to be Bin Laden. No 2: Bin Laden died of liver dysfunction years ago: The assassination authorized by Obama was another false flag operation. this video does not even begin to expose the thousands of other uncovered facts which prove it was a CIA operation and the connections between the Bin Laden family and the Bush Family.

  • Dont forget about the asbestos . From the mind of another critical thinking "truther" who has covered 911 for years I WAS an avid reader of National Geographic and Popular Mechanics . .Thanks for the post . Was building 7 pre wired ? watch?v=YKrUZERj1cQ

  • 12 people got their reality destroyed by watching this video!!! :o

  • I AM JESUS,

    I AM THE 666 IN REVELATION,

    I AM THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH...

  • @ulived1969 YOU are offtopic

  • Only the guilty parties obstruct justice the way they did. The 9 11 Con Mission members knew they had to cover their butts when we started discussing their co-conspirator role.

  • Be wise be happy and most of all Be the moment of peace and truth support the honest around you be the peace in the moments of your interactions, think on whatsoever things are worthy and true be space around you be the moments in which life happens. Skip the ego, and anger and wasted time. Be encouragement, be life and shelter. The truth already has come out now support the next part, Vote the good Dr Ron Paul, do what you may to support him as well as all compassionate and honesty. Cheers

  • too bad that the "architects of 9/11" still out there .. :-\

  • it did not ate it's way through the engine, it just melted the skin, same as the safety box.

  • national Geographic disappoints me :(

  • @IFrancyISantosI NatGeo, PopMech,, on and on, the "media" is in the criminals hands and they spin their own lies into a false reality that people accept, unquestioning, as the truth. I think their attitude must be, "they can't tell lies, some one will sue them". So the criminal controllers keep on killing.

    I also blame those that feel their god will step in to 'take care of the bad guy',,, how else can you explain the meek acceptance of the liars claims, with no evidence to back them up.

  • At 28:40.. why would they have to simulate this crap about the Pentagon while this building has tons of camera's , if they want to debunk "truthers" about no plan in the pentagon. Why not just show us a video ????????

  • @SuperHns Ive been saying that for years.Its funny how they avoid talking about 90 cameras around the building but they wont show any of a plane hitting.If you have video evidence why not show it to the public??? Because it was horse shit the story we were all told.Great point

  • @SuperHns true why hide the videos to hide the evidence to an inside job

    are people going to sit on their asses like they did when JFK was murder

    or are they going to finally say enough! we demand the real truth now!

    or else....

  • The plan since WW11 communism, terrorism rogue nations, then the grande finale ALIENS lmao

  • Building 7 was not hit by anything and it fell. Any questions?

  • and also wtc tower 7

  • It wasn't a "Government" conspiracy.

    There WERE people within the government involved, but to say that the "Government" was involved is ridiculous and easily dismissed by the corporate/fascist media.

  • FAKE !!! there never was any towers.

  • Whoever made this has not examined what the other side has proven.

  • they dont need demolition company to hire

    when they have navy seals  mercenaries to do this stuff

  • The Twin Towers was a crime scene, why was all of it bull dozed up and put on a ship to be melted down by China? Wasn't this a crime scene?!!!! Where was the investigation? Crime scene or Not?!!!!  Nope, evidence shipped off to China...Why?!!!!!

  • @VIKING33NY The same way Oklahoma City was covered up, illegally covered up. This is called conspiracy after the fact.

  • 9:32 shows how they are lying... a wing is destroying columns one after the other, it touches a column and the column doesnt even bend, they dissapear!

    A tank's armour is half the thickness of these columns and you need shells made of harder elements travelling at over mach 2 to penetrate a tank but a 500 mph aluminium plane can penetrate several thicker steel columns easier?

    And according to this simulation it doesnt destroy them, it makes them dissapear! terrorist have magic planes!!!

  • All you got to do to see that 911 was an inside job is look at the way bush acted he had no surprise at all he just sat there. If i was pres and someone came and told me we are under attack i would of been freaking out ! He just sat there, watch the vid and the way he acts and you can tell it's an inside job. TO FUCKIN OBVIOUS!!!

  • @dan32749 good point

  • @dan32749 Then he has the nerve to say, "don't believe outrageous conspiracy theories" as he states the wildest most unbelievable one of them all. The non-defensive reaction demonstrates 100% control from the top over OUR military operations,,, and that falls on the Commander in Chief. The preparations leading up to it, changing the long standing practice of base commanders calling the intercept option, leasing all of the WTC to a private party to remove the publics legal 'need to know',,,

  • @ISamuelII YA IT'S REALLY SAD THAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TURNED INTO SHEEPLE!!!

  • @dan32749 Sure. But it's not so much about what Bush did or didn't do at that moment but, how his Secret Service guard reacted...or didn't. Tarpley's book does a good job in discussing this political aspect of the oldest trick in the book of Empire, the false flag op.

  • @JoeyRapps1 Ya they are losing their control over information! WE WILL EXPOSE THEM!!

  • @dan32749 What is also too obvious,,, their claims of "unknown attackers" would have the secret service sweeping Bush up and taken away, forget about upsetting the children.

    Far too many clues to whew was responsible, and nobody paid to do their Justice job refuse to act. They all should be rounded up as co-conspirators.

  • @SlackerSlayer Oh ya it's painfully obvious!!! We need the truth and arrests so that we can heal properly! Watch "psychologists help 911 truth deniers"

  • @dan32749 yea very obvious the bastard just sat there like a puppet

    no reaction...no emotion he's so cold...i think he gets better reaction when he's taking a dump...bastard.

  • @mephisto88x I know we need to put his ass in JAIL!!!!!

  • facts dont need to be believed.

  • SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Rumsfeld told Sam Donaldson the attack was a job for the FBI as he sat in his Pentagon office watching it on TV.

  • @GroceryGame1981 PLEASE tell me there is a video... Lol

  • @Fred420ist type this into you tube, can't post a link here v=lBX0LHmy0rQ

    9-16-2001 ABC This Week keywords

  • If you americans think the alQaeda is capable of doing this!!! than it proofed that you americans are really a bunch of morons controlled by the rich ...

  • "Wake up u guise! The Patriots losing the Super Bowl is a kunspiracyyyy! Bush did it all!

    If u think I wrong, ur dumb!"

    -Conspiracy Theorist Logic

  • FUCK you national geographic... FUCK YOU.. i'm sick and tired of your fuckry

  • americans stop bein morons and do some fuckin research for christ sake.. damn.. your govt keep fuckin you aver and all you do is ... i cant believe.. i cant believe.. .jeezzzzzzzzz ... the rest of the fuckin world is watching and the perils of the american people will NEVER go away because of what happened on 9/11.. it WILL NEVER go away.. its too great an evil that led to even greater evils... IT SHALL NEVER PASS.

  • If 9/11 wasnt the Muslims, then who flew the plane and what happened to the actual planes?

  • @linghun Look for a video with another plane flying in the background, parrallel with the plane flying into the building. You will find that it is an E-4-B. Thes planes are capable of flying drones. Ever see the fuel test footage from a remotely controlled 707 being crashed on purpose? Look it up. The 9-11 planes, I believe, were 'drones'. Flown by remote control. Remember all the "practice" drills going on and the"scenarios" being staged by the govt. that day? It all fits right in.

  • @Fred420ist no planes, sorry. drone cannot displace those steel support structures and "melt" into the building, crashing thru the entire building and exiting the other side. maybe if it was solid titanium, but not likely. road-runner cartoon plane crash just doesn't hold water.

  • @Marleyites Looneytune? It's simple and no cartoon. They have been flying FULL SIZE PLANES since the '40's by remote control. EVERYONE can planely see the "white" E-4-B flying in the background behind the second plane. E-4-B = Command Center. The "planes" = drones. No cartoon... REAL LIFE.... Don't be so simple. Don't be a tool for them.

  • @Fred420ist I don't dispute that they can remote control anything, including people. But, what they can't do is push an aluminum tube thru all that steel and have the "nose" come out the other side. just can't happen the way the videos show and official explanation.

  • @Marleyites So we have no dispute. The titanium shafts from the engines could eaily punch through, but at the same time we alo know that the composite material from he nose, won't. "The 'built in missile' theory is still plausible and believable when watching the event in stop motion.

  • @Fred420ist ok, but how do you resolve the roadrunner-style outline in the steel facade and the nose-thru to the other side of the building?

  • @Marleyites I can't say I've noticed a "Roadrunner" shaped hole. Nice of you to refer to it. Maybe you watched to many 'looney tunes' when you were a wee one. Not all of the facade broke in the same places. The plane went in at an angle. The PLANE, that was flown by remote control, from the E-4-B in the background, flew in at an angle and made your 'Roadrunner". If you don't think momentum and mass will take out the facade and titanium shafts flew out the other side, then what do you interject?

  • @Fred420ist oh yes, of course, quite right, I missed those points didn't I? nice of you to point it out. have a grand and lovely evening.

  • @Marleyites Not so "Looney Tunes", is it? Lol. I will correct my posts now. Disclaimer: All my posts are theory ONLY because I don't have access to Govt. files But I say my theory would be the scenario and fits PERFECTLY. Theoretically of course. Want to watch a missile "theory" being launched into the Pent.? Look for: Rare_Pentagon_9_11_Surveillanc­e_Camera_of_Impact - Youtube *right here on youtube. Watch the left of the screen at 39 seconds or so. It will repeat for you two more times. News

  • @Fred420ist sorry for the misunderstanding. i wouldn't believe anything you present. you've shown your hand, that was all i needed to know. 911 no planes. aluminum cannot penetrate steel in that fashion. beep beep.

  • @Marleyites As I stated before... I know where you get your theories.... Looney tunes. No planes? Looney tunes. Roadrunner? Beep beep? Lol. Go eat somemore fruitcake you get sent during the holidays. Your "Roadrunner made by a titanium tube" theory is solid. Run with that. Your truth movement should succeed with that. Tell that one to the jury and really sell it. Don't forget to rest on the fact that it's shaped like a Roadrunner so it has to be your "Looneytune" way. New debunking tactic?

  • @Marleyites The sheer forcefrom the mass dislodged the welds and bolts that hold the facade together when it was pieced together in a staggard fashion. You know, staggard, like your theory. Uneducated and misinformed. Argue your way out of a FEMA camp.

  • @linghun Alledgedly crashed in Shankesville Penn. - United Air Lines Flt. 93

    Boeing B-757-222

    N591UA 44/44 Aircraft Description

    Serial Number 28142 Type Registration

    Corporation Manufacturer Name BOEING Certificate Issue Date

    07/01/1996 Model 757-222 Mode S Code 51721341 Year

    Manufacturer 1996 (Cancel Date 09/28/2005 Reason for

    Cancellation Cancelled Exported ) Note the date of cancel and export.

  • @linghun 1st plane into tower 2 - United Air Lines Flt. 175

    Boeing B-767-222

    N612UA 65/65

    11 Sep 2001 New York City, New York Aircraft Description

    Serial Number 21873 Type Registration

    Corporation Manufacturer Name BOEING Certificate Issue Date

    01/18/1984 Model 767-222 Mode S Code 51773757 Year

    Manufacturer 1983 Cancel Date 09/28/2005 Reason for

    Cancellation Cancelled Exported Again... the date... Ridiculous screw-up? I think not...

  • National geographic obviously think their audience are complete and utter fuckwits to pass this off as investigative journalism,the whole world is seriously fucked with these wankers in charge!

  • Among the lies is the claim no evidence of explosives found, when Steve Jones and Niels Harrit published in a peer reviewed journal finding those tiny red chips Steve talks about here which had super-explosive nano-thermite in a very high tech form adapted for spraying on surfaces, with the aluminum and ferrous oxide particles in intimate contact within chambers of foam. That's how the concrete and nearly everything but the steel turned into very fine dust that washed away with the rain.

  • You would have much more credibility as a commentator if you knew the correct pronounciation of aluminum... hehe

  • at 37;20 he says it is the biggest Flase Flag Operation of all time, I say wrong, its 2nd....

    1st) is the Extresstrial Being UFO cover up..

    2nd) Is 911.

    3rd) is Obamas placement as president. A doctored PDF layered Birthcerticate, and a mok S.S N number...

  • I remember the last time people started questioning the cover up openly, even some political figures started agreeing the case needed to be reopened,when coincidentally we had a oil rig blow up in the gulf of Mexico which completely diverted attention away from the topic and even more coincidental, Halliburton had just got done working on it.

  • 1. Interesting to note that in the Pentagon simulation, they conveniently forgot to add the engines

    2. Sozen; "We have the plans for the Pentagon. ALL the details.." So; If they'll release THE WHOLE PENTAGON SCHEMATICS AND BLUEPRINTS (& show the 'crashes' to the WTC's), WHY IS IT THAT RELEASING ONE SINGLE VIDEO OF THE PENTAGON BEING HIT IS CLASSIFIED AS "National Security"?

    ANYONE connected to ANY 'debunking' effort, should, when the truth comes out, be charged with Conspiracy to commit Murder

  • If a commercial jet hit the pentagon, show us the tape that proves it... 

  • @steviebrochdale onsite witness states flight 93 was flying away from scene after missile explosion at pentagon - Also flight 175 was seen still flying on radar after it was supposed to hit tower 1. Answer - two planes coincide in the air seeming to come together as it were, and loop away from each other - one looks like it is a continuous flight tragectory but actually the flight was exchanged. Flight 175 continues to fly onwards while missile takes over flight path

  • @steviebrochdale ditto

  • @1:05 "The damage to the Pentagon was not caused by a 577." Is the speaker dyslexic?

    If it was a plane, then it was 757, not 577.

  • @jockboy69 He says "Flight 77" not "577"

  • @Tombizar Heard it wrong; no matter: it wasn't flight 77 or a 757 airliner. Too small a hole; no bodies, no baggage, no wings, no engines. 1/4 of a second of a video. All else suppressed (or, probably destroyed!). Total conspiracy on the part of the gov't. Israeli-American False Flag.

    The whole thing a complete fabrication.

    If the gov't. considers the Amer. public to be complete idiots, they may be RIGHT!

    What's the telphone # of the Int'l Court in the Hague? LOL!

  • To know the truth about 9/11 plz watch this: DIMITRI KHALEZOV, 9/11

  • Comment removed

  • I just viewed Dr. Alan Saborsky speaking on this subject in an interview about 9-11 and Israel's involvement on TV program, "The Autograph" on one of the channels here. Very interesting.

  • The ultra rich are experts at convincing the masses that what they see is really not true. The twin towers and building 7 were brought down with explosives all orchestrated by a corrupt elite group of rogues, murderers who will go to any length to do as they please, when they please and how they please, As they use your money to enslave you, kill you and lie to you on a constant river of unbelievable ruse of deception.

  • No wings on the model is fucking hillarious if it wasnt SOO SAD. Thats the stupidest shit Ive ever seen.

  • I leave that investigation to you smartass, I'm not as brainiac as you are and by the way is that all you have to say? Lol

    Who cares if they landed on the moon or not, if they want to land on mars or not, this fucking country is going down the drain, you'll hear and see more surprises that will blow your head off, the american pride is no more, so deal with it.

  • Building 7? Anyone? Anyone?

  • watch "September Clues" there were no planes

  • You're kidding me! You truther nuts are still at this? Wow lolololol. It's hilarious how these nuts have an explanation for everything except for ONE critical question that they can never answer. They never have and never will be able to. 

  • @moonlitphantasm what is that question that we apparently never answer

  • @abaguley25 For you conspiracy nuts, I ask this. An operation like this would require an insurmountable level of logistics. To secure demolitions that would bring all of these buildings down is not something that could be done in a clandestine manner. Truthers have said that the airliners were redirected to secret bases and the passengers are now living under new identities. Are you kidding? LOL There's an old saying. For a conspiracy between 3 people to remain a secret 2 must be dead.

  • @moonlitphantasm look at the WTC7, no need to say more, just use your sense of logic.

  • @moonlitphantasm Look at the WTC7, use your logic... If the 2 towers were hit by a planes, what caused the WTC7 to fall down. If a building was bombarded by fighter jets from above and by sheelings from rockets, it won't be destroyed completely, look at the buildings in was zones, some are still standing despite hundreds of shellings and thousands of bullits...

    Use your sense of logic, one lie is enough to make people doubt that there's something hidden within all this madness.

  • @comali2212 All that is missing is your ability to spell. Ok brainiac, if these buildings were demolished as you believe, tell me this. A controlled demolition begins at the base of a building and sequential charges detonate from the bottom up. The WTC went from the top down. Feel free to continue this argument with me but you have no chance of winning. If anyone needs logic, it is you sir. A conspiracy between 3 people can only remain secret if 2 of the 3 are dead.

  • @moonlitphantasm I did that on purpose (misspelling) just to receive your reaction about it coz I knew in advance that you'll make a comment about it. Now let's get back to our subject.

    I mentioned the WTC7 not the the twin towers (seems you have a problem focusing). The twin towers went down from top to bottom to cover the suspiciousness,

  • @comali2212 Uh huh... nice try kid.

  • @moonlitphantasm Imagine if they went from bottom top 'as your smart sense of logic" views it, wouldn't be as clear as a sunshine that it's a demolition plan watched life on Media and all over the world?

    Look closely at the videos (no need for a conspiracy crap) look closely, you can see the explosions went off periodically as the buildings went down, right beneath almost every collapsed floor there was an explosion detonated, they went down like a pan cake, one after the other.

  • @comali2212 But of course it did lol. I hope this isn't taking time away from your investigation of whether or not we really landed on the moon or not lol.

  • I won't expand more in this debate, I suggest you watch " Alan Sabrosky " 10 years US Marine Corps Veteran, and he's Jewish by the way, watch him speaking about that day and you'll have a clue, you can find him on YouTube.

    Have an open mind, that's what it takes to understand.

  • @moonlitphantasm Redirected to secret bases? WTF? Your favored conspiracy theory as detailed in the 9/11 commission and Nist reports about the cave dwellers with box cutters defeating the most secure and advanced air space defenses is just as nuts as the idiotic redirected to secret bases. 6/10 including the chair of the 9/11 commission say it was a criminal coverup that goes all the way to the white house. cnnDOTcom/2006/POLITICS/08/02/­9-11panel.pentagon/index.html

  • @moonlitphantasm democracynowDOTorg/2004/3/23/t­he_white_house_has_played_cove­r "As each day goes by, we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before Sept. 11 than it has ever admitted... I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised." 9/11 commissioner and former Georgia Senator max Cleland, Yet you still believe fables?

  • fucking 100,000,000 mother fuckers...... THERMITE...... SUPER THERMITE FUCKERS

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more