Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (819)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • .......... Its something you can find by simply googling it.. Jesus Christ.

  • Fucking nixon embraced mao but supported the coup against salvador allende in chile,allende was elected by chilean peopla and did not killed millions like mao did,hypocrites republicans!!!

  • None of this matters. Who's hand soiled Jefferson, Washington, or Lincoln's hand? Diplomacy and protocol are a part of a President's job. It's the deal that is sealed with that handshake that matters. We would be better served to think about that. Instead, we think more about what the pundits tell us to think about. Face it folks, the people are sheeple. Drink the cool-aid and let Kissingers plan of population control win the day.

  • Prescott Bush shook hand with Hitler and Reagan shook hands with Gorbachev. Reagan wasn't a scumbag. The Bushes are all scumbags.

  • @BiggerFatterBlog

    I've got no love for Bushes, but Reagan absolutely was a scumbag in my opinion

  • USSR KICKS YOUR ASS

  • Mao was a Communist dictator? (whoops on your part)

  • @AtheismCentral

    I think by dictator they mean "not elected" as in "took the country by force."

    Though, it was certainly a popular revolution where Mao was in the right, it was definitely taken by force.

    But to hell with that, long live Chairman Mao!

  • @theherooftime4

    He was elected by the communist party though, but yeah you are right, Long live Mao Zedong! I consider myself a Stalinist personally but as a supporter of the Black Panther party (being a native american non white supporter) and also recognizing what a progressive leader Chairman Mao was, he was awesome.

    I like how mike tyson has a tatoo of che and mao. Goes to show the oppressed peoples (blacks, etc) were supported by Mao. Bless Mao and the oppressed masses.

  • @AtheismCentral

    You're right. He was elected.

    After the revolution. It was a glorious revolution. A good one. A beautiful proletariat one.

    Also, I think the black panther party is very good! I support them fully as well! Chairman Mao was also a wonderful person. People think he was terrible, and yes, he may have had to order the kill a few people to achieve his goal, but really, you have to do what you have to do to achieve civil rights.

    I miss USSR. :(

  • @theherooftime4

    Comrade, most people in the masses love mao, especially the african american population, who have undergone so much struggle (bless them) who love him as well.

    80 percent of Russia supports Communism and hates capitalism, even putin came out and said communism was good, putin is beating on big buisness and fighting anti stalin propaganda as well. As for Zyuganov, he will come to power either through reform or revolution.

    Everyone misses the USSR :) Mao made china great!

  • @AtheismCentral

    I am glad, comrade.

    I was born in USSR, and miss when it was around. I moved to China when it collapsed. I couldn't stand living in the pathetic capitalist masses.

    I hope soon our party will have our voice heard again! I think soon it will. The Capitalists can only ignore us for a certain time.

    Soon they will see, we were good all along, it was their own leaders that lied to them.

  • @theherooftime4

    They are already seeing! Glory! Power to the people!

    while the USSR went revisionist, the workers state continued even after the evils of the revisionist leaders.

  • I wonder if you are going to upload a vid showing that Colmes lied about enhanced interrogation NOT being used , when in FACT its was, and we have George Bush to thank for the recent killing of osma

  • @carlindelco Colmes just quoted Rumsfeld and he was right. Just cause rumsfeld changed his story doesnt make colmes wrong. Rumsfelds comments are fact and on record. also another republican admits waterboarding is torture, its 2008 republican presidential candidate John Mccain, and war hero. Also Mancow, a republican talk radio host said he would get waterboarded to prove it wasnt torture...he lasted 6 seconds live on air and admitted it is torture. all facts can be proven & i am a republican

  • @IrishDavaRox LMAO "Rumsfeld changed HIS story" ? There you go, this is what normal people say about liberals, that even when there is irrefutable evidence you guys deny reality and truth. Colmes LIED and has NO evidence to support what he said, and yet you believe it, because of ideology. This is why Liberals have NO creditability. SHOW me the record video or tape ok? He admitted it was torture, wow.. yeah I see what you mean. Torture, deff: Burning, Crushing or wounding. Which is it?

  • @carlindelco george bush the guy who he didn't know bin laden was nor did he care bush? it must kill you that obama did the job that bush couldn't.

  • @janto58 If it wasn't for George W Bush, Obama would NOT have had the chance to do what he did,,,, Plain and simple/// I do give some credit to Obama for doing it, as a liberal it must have cased him great anguish to kill an enemy of America..

  • Nixon should have made any trade deals with China and any American investment contingent on basic human rights and an end to one-party Communist rule. The concept that 'engagement' will lead to reform on the part of repressive dictatorships has time and again been proven a fallacy. Appeasement doesn't work! Nixon took the first step to creating the situation we are in today- economically dependant on a regime that slaughters its own people and complicit in the crimes of Communist tyranny

  • @TheTollundWoman We finally found something to agree upon.

  • Rumsfeld was a private citizen at the time he shook hands with Saddam, and didn't rise to a cabinet level position until later. It is shameful the way that we armed Saddam when it was convenient to counter the rise of Islamic Iran, but then attacking for possessing the weapons we gave him. There is more blood on Don Rumsfeld's hands than Saddam Hussein could ever dream of, and that includes the Iran Iraq war. We have murdered so many in the name of peace that it scares me.

  • @Zyworski

    "There is more blood on Rumsfeld's hands than Sadaam Hussein could ever dream of"??

    Do you have any idea what Sadaam did to his own people?? Rumsfeld didn't model his political party off the Nazis, Rumsfeld didn't attempt genocide, Rumsfeld didn't use chemical weapons, Rumsfeld didn't have people gassed to death. There is NO moral equivalency between Rumsfeld and Husseein, Hussein was guilty of GENOCIDE.

  • @TheTollundWoman I am reluctant to blame Saddam for the use of chemical weapons as the Iranians were using mass human wave assaults in a blatant disregard for the lives of their own citizens, kind of like Germany and France in WW1. As leader of his country he has an obligation to protect his people, if Iran wanted to line them up like ducks in a row that is their fault. The use of chemical weapons to combat domestic insurgencies doesn't constitute genocide just overkill.

  • @Zyworski

    Well. you may be reluctant. But the legal precedent is crystal clear, in both ww1 and ww2 the use of chemical weapons in combat, let alone against civilians, was very clearly classified as a direct violation of international law and a massive crime against humanity. You may not "blame" Saddam for attempting genocide, but his own people did, which is why they executed him

  • @TheTollundWoman I must regretfully inform you that you get to be wrong again, the Geneva Protocol on chemical weapons was not adopted until 1925 7 years after the end of WWI. Genocide is defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group". The suppression of a political uprising is not the same as the systematic extermination of a people. Turning Saddam over to the Shiites was like Pilate turning Jesus to the Priesthood

  • @Zyworski

    Oh please, "domestic insurgencies" i.e. the Kurdish people *defending* themselves from the Ba'ath party murderers? Whatever "domestic insurgencies" existed in Saddam's Iraq were heroes. But you know perfectly well the vast majority of Saddam's victims were CIVILIANS

  • @Zyworski

    You're probably also reluctant to blame Hitler and Mussolini for their atrocities, afterall they were both threatened by "the American war machine." Anyway, this debate is pointless. The outcome I desire- a liberated Iraq that has brought Saddam Hussein to justice- has been acheived. Your desired outcome- an Iraq under Saddam's rule, with millions more civilians slaughtered- is, as Ronald Reagan would sya, "in the ash-heap of history."

  • @TheTollundWoman Actually in the case of the Nazi axis they were threatened by the murderous Stalin, but the final solution IS an example of REAL genocide. I have more bad news, your so called liberation of Iraq has disrupted the balance of power in the Middle East and the moment we leave all hell is going to break loose. There will be blood in the streets as the Shiite's and Sunni's come to terms, when that day comes are you still going to blame Saddam? What we are doing has no legitimacy.

  • @Zyworski I just did some quick research and you are right, Saddam is responsible for 1M Iranians, 250-500k Iraqi's, 50-100k domestic/Kurds. It is hard to get accurate estimates of the dead caused by the US war machine but it looks to be in the 250-500k range, which is considerably less. This of course is cold comfort to the 250-500k who lost their lives. If one considers that the Iran, Iraq war dead were the result of our instigation then the issue gets more complicated.

  • @Zyworski

    I am not talking about the use of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq war. I'm talking about Sadaam's decision to use poison gas on Kurdish CIVILIANS in peacetime. And using chemical weapons is a direct violation of international law and a blatant violation of human rights, not that i expect a Ba'ath party apologist to care much about human rights...Sadaam attempted genocide against the Kurds, he only failed because the Coalition Forces intervened

  • @TheTollundWoman I will agree that the retaliation against the Peshmerga was so heavy handed as to rise to the borderline level of genocide, but the Halbja massacre of March 16, 1988 happened long before Desert Storm. I do care about human rights, but we can start in our own backyard. The right-wing dictatorships of Latin America have been repressing for a century in the name of American agro conglomerates, we don't do anything there because they don't have oil for us to pilfer.

  • @Zyworski

    Oh god...the US war machine....the US Army is the sixth largest in the world after India, China, Pakistan, and North and South Korea. The myth about America's "war machine" is very tiring. How come I never hear people complaining about "the PLA war machine" or the "Pakistani ware machine" or the "KPA war machine"? Is there anything you wouldn't excuse in the name of anti-Americanism?

  • @TheTollundWoman Well you get to hear it now the ISI are the real ones behind the Taliban and Al Qaeda, but that pussy Bush is to afraid to take on a country that is capable of defending themselves. After 9/11 Pakistan should have been bum rushed if it were not for one hidden fact that you will have trouble comprehending. The whole Afghan campaign is not about the Taliban or Al Qaeda, it is about interdicting natural gas pipelines between Turkmenistan and China to maintain American Imperialism.

  • LMAO Bill O' is so ignorant that he couldn't remember all the trips Nixon took to China ,shit he even went there after he got impeached and left the whitehouse !......

  • O'Reilly is a whore.

  • @mandaladouble that's mean....to whores.

  • Actually, Bill was addressing that Nixon interacted with Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai more than Chairman Mao Zedong aka Mao Tse-tung. So glad the the young turds found it humorous.

  • Comment removed

  • OMG, CHECK IT OUT THE PHOTO, ANOTHER MASON HANDSHAKE

  • CLINTON AND BUSH INVITED A LEADER OF AN IRISH TERRORIST ORGANISATION 'GERRY ADAMS'TO THE U.S ON SEVERAL OCCASSIONS,AND THEY HAD A FREAKN PARTY FOR HIM!

    THEN TO TOP IT OFF TONY BLAIR PUT HIM INTO THE NORTHERN IRELAND GOVERNMENT ALONG WITH ANOTHER HANDFULL OF 'CONVICTED'MURDERS-THE WORLDS GONE MAD!

  • @looknfortruth

    State your sources. Gerry Adams may well have supported, only to a certain extent I might add, the PIRA. It has never been proven that he was a leader of the PIRA. One thing is certain, however, he has always been associated with constitutional republicanism.

    As for power-sharing, Tony Blair had no choice but to create a government which includes all ideologies and movements. If peace is truly to be achieved, it is only through cooperation it can be achieved.

  • @rabbiemunro darkie huges would disagree with you,you idiot..

    as for tony blair not having a choice..are you serious?to put the likes of gerry kelly,matin and the rest of the terrorists into power is a slap in the face for all us you lost loved ones here.

    where are you from to be so deluded?

  • @rabbiemunro as for sources,j118 and any of the documents linked with the fru would be a start,or you could have lived here,everyone in northern ireland know people who were actually involed in the troubles.

    i have never met a member that would deny gerrys position.

    what a fkn idiot you are...

  • @looknfortruth

    Brendan Hughes is one source, and the book based on his interviews were only published just over 6 months ago and are yet to face genuine scrutiny.

    I'm neither Republican nor Unionist btw, but how many of the Unionists in Stormont were once affiliated with the UVF or the UDA?

    As for power-sharing, muse upon this quote from a great man, "the best way to destroy an enemy, is to make him a friend" Abraham Lincoln

  • @rabbiemunro id be intrested to know how many unionists in stormount you think are 'affiliated'?

    so do you think that a convicted murderer sent to jail for the crime,who then shots a prison guard IN jail is qualified and respectable enough to be a politician?because i dont want murderers deciding my families future no matter what religion they are.

    as for your quote,perfect!just how british intel took the ira,and the uvf/uda.do you know the amount of documented touts of both sides?

  • @looknfortruth

    Are you telling me just because you are from Northern Ireland you know who was and who wasn't in the PIRA? The role of Gerry Adams in the PIRA is one of the many UNSOLVED mysteries of the Troubles (you cannot deny this), yet just by being from the six counties you've solved it! Well done.

  • @rabbiemunro lol,your too funny.theres not to many people here of my age that doesnt know a 'terrorist'.you clearly have no idea what your talking about and to just the extent off the numbers signed up to a paramilitary groups over the years.i suggest you ask a republician that question and see if they answer with a straight face,ofcourse the numerous photos,videos and statements showing gerry in full army regalia must have been photoshopped..its not really a mystery here my friend

  • @looknfortruth

    Also, its a bit pathetic that you feel the need to add a wee insult at the end of every statement you make. Sign of a weak man methinks

  • YOUNG TURKS FUKIN GAY. GO HOME TO TURKEY AND GET RAPED UP THE ASS BY YOUR MUSLIM DADDIES

  • @Purplecatsoup30 Haha, look, it's an example!

  • @Stillwell86 Yeah, totally dude! You know, I don't think your pathetic for admiting that happened to you. But you are gay. Drink some shit water.

  • @Purplecatsoup30 Hahaha, you are too cute.

  • this lying sack of shit spread lies about malmady massacre during ww2 american soldiers pwo's executed by Nazi's and Bill Oreilly presented as if american executed nazis pwo.

    I am not even American even i know this.

  • If your not worried about ORielly statement why do keep talking about it?

  • How about Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein? Should that had happened?

    /watch?v=bUPb-3zkh0c

  • TheYoungTurks, do you plan on becoming a journalist/anchorman for your own show at some point?

  • The raise you get? From Republicans? The same Republicans that want to abolish labor unions from our planet and do away with full-time work benefits? Are you referring to those philanthropists? The same republicans that make unions out to be this huge monstrous powerhouse of wealth and power? Unions that rely entirely on dues from their workers middle class salaries to exist. While corporations have billions and billions to sway government with? Those sweet, generous, giving Republicans?

  • Impression of bluegsp:

    Mmmmfffffmmmmmffffffohbillmmff­ffffff!

    Translation: bluegsp loves the cock, so long as it's BILL'S cock, and doesn't let facts, thoughts, proof, or rational observation dissuade him.

  • I just love morons like this guy trying to look smarter than O"Reilly. Since this video, a MILLION times more people have tuned into to O"Reilly than have watch this video. I feel like I just wasted 2 min 43 seconds of my life.

  • @Chownings You mean the Bill O'Reilly who said that Malmedy was an AMERICAN atrocity against German POWs? And never retracted?

    THAT genius? By the way, ten million times more people tuned into Happy Days than Bill O'Reilly. You know why most people watch Bill? It's easier than changing the channel until The Simpsons come on.

    MAGGIE is smarter than Bill. Proof? She only speaks when she's sure of what she's saying.

  • Comment removed

  • Bill never said that. It was Keith Olbermann that perpetrated that lie. Olbermann exploits weak minds like yours because he knows that you are too lazy to form your own opinion. Learn to think for yourself and see Olbermann for what he is. He only hurts your ideology and most liberals have distanced themselves from him already.

  • @bluegsp I saw the video with my own eyes. Dude, go play with yourself. It's in Bill's interview, not Keith Olbermann's. I went to the source, unless you'd like to document yourself to the contrary.

  • @bluegsp But just to address your clear lack of grasp, I'm not a liberal. You don't really have to be a liberal to detest Bill O'Reilly's shrill, ignorant, hateful fear-mongering, nor his rather pervasive habit of playing fast and loose with the facts.

    I don't like him because he's a demonstrable liar, a blathering bully, passive racist, and a sexual predator of his co-worker. Nice guy.

    Distancing myself from BILL should be your concern. He makes me feel like I need a shower when he talks.

  • @bluegsp "Bill never said that."

    WRONG.

    This is Fox News' own transcript:

    foxnewsDOTcomSLASHstorySLASH0,­2933,197635,00DOThtml

    Will you be a man and admit you were wrong? Or will you be a BILL?

  • @bluegsp Wow, just noticed that remark: "Weak minds like yours".

    ROFL, sorry, there, idiot squared. I saw the video on FOX's site, read the transcript on FOX's site. I wasn't 'too lazy' to form my own opinion. I read the documents, saw the film, decided Bill's a dickwad.

    The absolute hysterical irony is, I have NO IDEA who the hell you've been letting form your own opinions, but I know who encourages your tactics of 'deny first, insult next, research...nahhh.'

    Again go play with yourself.

  • @OneVoiceMore Nope, I mean the Bill O"Reilly that will correct himself if he misspoke. Last time I checked, Malmedy was not on the radar of many in the US nor something we can do something about. Maybe you should hold the Germans accountable for that one.

    By the way, I check the Nielsen numbers and Happy Days was not even close to O"Reilly in viewership. Now go back to your job flipping burgers so I can watch the Simpsons.

  • @Chownings Bill didn't correct himself. He held the AMERICANS responsible for that one, to make his convoluted point that "Americans have committed atrocities'.

    I DO hold the Germans accountable for that one. I just wish Bill and all his little boyfriends would, too.

    It's like babysitting Bizarro.

    I misspoke on Happy Days. Golly, you sure busted me, there. Would you like me to show you any number of shows with better ratings that demonstrate my point?

    Oh no, the old burger-flipper dis. Novel.

  • @Chownings But, and let me absolutely show the Bill-shills for what they are.

    Loathesome little insects utterly missing the big people world. But if that world crosses them with its darned reality, they bite, they sting, they hiss, and some of them light off stink-bombs.

    All to try to convince you they're not insects.

    Go back to your therapy sessions, and this time, don't refuse a swing-by of the meds cart.

  • @OneVoiceMore Whats funny is that you actually think your making a difference. Bill O"Reilly is a success because people believe what he is saying. The fact that you try to insult us watchers is laughable. The only meds I'm on will be the high I get when Pelosi is downgraded to a mutt like she should be. Get ready for the conservative landslide as this will be our just rewards for a President/Idiot we have in charge right now.

  • @Chownings Making a difference? ROFL. I'm just mocking a pointless gasbag, and the pointless gasbags who adore him.

    I could care less about Nancy Pelosi.

    I'm pretty sure I can withstand another Republican landslide, like all the other Republican landslides before...heh, and basing the last Vice Presidential candidate that was put up like a donkey pinata from the GOP, I'm sure your next candidate justifies using the word 'idiot'.

    Good lord. Democrats and Republicans are dinosaurs.

    BOTH Suck.

  • @OneVoiceMore You have only proven what a moron you are. If you had any intelligence you would easily find that Morningside Partners is the company that does the transcripts for Fox, MSNBC and CNN. Fox didn't change them because they can't. Bill was referencing the "revenge killings" of Malmedy because Clark was accusing the Marines at Haditha of "revenge killings". You are a brain dead liberal idiot that cannot think for yourself and has no interest in the truth. Pathetic, really. XD

  • @bluegsp You, like Bill, make excuses for being complete fuckups.

    Here it is, short and sweet, pumpkin. You have no case, so you go on the warpath. You run your mouth, and say nothing. HI BILL! You two are cut from the same pink cloth, you chickenhawk pussies.

    Fox didn't change them because it's what Bill said. DERRRRRRRRR

    And you're right. Pathetic in pairs, you and Bill.

    I just hate rude assholes, no matter their politics. It's just that Bill-clones are the rudest, and therefore easy.

  • @OneVoiceMore Bill has never said that he didn't change the transcripts, he never responds to Olbermann or his insane rantings. These are not excuses, they are the facts, jackass. You have been completely owned and humiliated in this discussion, and exposed for the lying liberal propagandist that you are. I hope the shame does is not too great for you.  XD

  • @bluegsp And like your boyfriend, you place loose and easy with the facts, crow a victory you never achieved....and golly, here's a surprise from a Bill wannabe...you slap a label, call a name, and run off.

    "I hope the shame does is.." Me hope language the not problem big too you for.

    Exposed, oh NOES! You're doing INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM...of about the coloring-book level of Bill! You am big boy now!

    Olbermann's a FUNNY propagandist. Bill is a LOUD one. They're both idiots.

    You top both.

  • @OneVoiceMore "you place loose and easy..." Me hope language the not problem big too you for. DRRRRRRR. Irony is lost on mental midgets such as yourself. You have been easily dispatched and now you are only humiliating yourself. (Which I appreciate, by the way, as I have grown weary of it.) lying liberals such as yourself are such easy targets to expose for the idiots that you are. XD

  • @bluegsp Touche on the typo.

    You see how easy it is to admit you made a mistake? Easy for RATIONAL people, that is.

    I notice you have to tell yourself you've won, because no one else is.

    I also notice your insecurity about intelligence, in that once someone disagrees with your obvious servility to liars, you need to crow victory and RUN!

    Seeya. In your Bizarro world, you are important, and know quite a lot. When you visit earth, be sure to check out the scenery.

  • @OneVoiceMore You have been destroyed by both Chownings and myself (and I suspect anyone over the age of 4 that you may have had an argument with. Olbermann has also been dispatched for the unethical lying jack ass he is as well. You are in good company. XD

  • @bluegsp Olbermann, O'Reilly, agreed, two of a kind, exposed as biased commentators.

    Destroyed?

    Fantasize much? You're a universe of one. Enjoy your obscurity.

  • @OneVoiceMore I believe that last Tuesday demonstrated that liberal idiots like you are the dinosaurs and obsolete Soviet style artifacts. O'Reilly is nothing like your version of Tokyo Rose, Olbermann. You are such an intellectual light weight, This is like taking candy from a baby. You are pathetic dude.

  • @bluegsp I believe that everything you say demonstrates intellectual featherweight qualities. Like all YouTube trolls, of which there is no lack, you come out with your pinhead lit for easy identification. You call anyone who disagrees with you a liberal, which is your first and fastest shortcut to thinking. In fact, it's the only track to thinking you ever take.

    And of course, YOU are the only one saying you're smart.

    Crow your victory, minor internet warrior. You typify why America is failing

  • @bluegsp But let's look at your towering intellectual observation:

    One Senatorial race, and you have pronounced doom on an entire enlightened culture, as if in four years, like the pendular swings of Congress FOREVER, the pendulum won't swing back when short-memory people are reminded why Republicans need the keys to dad's car taken away again.

    Then the Dems will return, and screw things up, too.

    And idiots like you will believe we actually have a two-party system.

    Both sides are bought, you pay

  • @OneVoiceMore Such mindless drivel comes from your keyboard. You are obviously one of those intellectually vacuous liberals that label yourself an "independent". You think you are above it all when in reality, you are beneath it all. You think you are the smartest guy in the room when in fact you don't have a clue. This is a victory for conservatism. Republicans will fail again if they follow the Bush/McCain model of appeasement to liberals. Conservatives are the real grownups

  • @bluegsp I'm just above YOU. If you're an example of a conservative, then let me sum it up:

    Low, cruel, indifferent, dishonest, insecure and completely without value.

    If you think your remarks have any traction with anyone of intellect, it's precisely indicative of your low-echelon peer group.

    It's trite to say, and bounces off of a bitter troll like yourself, but I really do feel sorry for you, because it's clear that the highlight of your moment is the imagination that you've hurt someone.

  • @OneVoiceMore You are not above snail shit you intellectual pygmy. If you bothered to look up the definition of "neo-con", you would learn that it is not an insult. But that is too much to expect from such a simple minded puppet as you. I am not a republican, I am a conservative and if they don't do what America sent them to do, they will fail. The only "MONUMENTAL failure" is the Obama regime. Your pathetic stupidity is on full display and really quite amusing to watch. XD

  • @bluegsp We had eight years of Republicans failing anything resembling a conservative agenda, but you knew that. Bigger government, out of control spending, interventionist foreign policy, unprecedented decline in personal rights.

    I expect no different from Obama.

    It would be NICE to see some real conservativism in this country.

    But it's not the world we live in, and it's not on ANY politician's agenda, with perhaps the exception of Ron Paul.

    I just don't buy the bullshit we get sold every term.

  • @OneVoiceMore Bigger Government and too much spending, yes. That is how Obama was able to fool his way into office. I would hardly call the Bush administration "8 years of Republicans failing" Maybe you can explain which "personal right" you lost under Bush, And responding to terrorist attacks is not "interventionist", it is protecting America, which is the primary job of a president. You should stop watching MSNBC's anti America propaganda and learn to think for yourself.

  • @bluegsp I would call attacking Iraq which had NOTHING to do with 9/11 interventionist. The Bush Doctrine is the DEFINITION of interventionist.

    What rights did I lose? Are you drunk? How about the right not to have my phone calls monitored without a warrant? If you think our two Middle East wars made us safer, you're a putz. And I can't believe you suggest Bush protected us.

    What color is the sky in your homeworld? This isn't MSNBC, you partisan drone. It's call READING.

  • @OneVoiceMore "When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know....

  • @OneVoiceMore So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions."

    --Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003

    This lie perpetrated by the left has no steam left. After 9/11, everyone was on board to go into Iraq. (and I can provide the quotes to prove it). Un American democrats then used the war for political reasons in 2004

  • @bluegsp And there it is, the official narrative: Call anyone who disagrees with you Un-American.

    It's very simple: Bush was not a conservative, and his interventionist doctrine isn't disputed.

    And you might want to ask yourself HOW Hussein got the capability for WMDs, which goes a long way to explain why Bush was so sure they were there.

  • @OneVoiceMore You lose one argument so you go on to another. I never said Bush was a conservative. we had as many problems with him as you America hating liberals have, only for different reasons. Bush's actions to keep America safe after 9/11 were justified and effective and are still in effect today. (has Obama done anything he promised the "anti war leftist" during the election? no. Because campaigning is no leading. He was good at campaigning and a complete failure at leading.

  • @bluegsp Anyway, it's been fun babysitting your McCarthyism of my hatred of America. Clearly, you never served in the military, for all your 'love of country'.

    If you think the Patriot Act keeps you safe, enjoy your magic bubble.

  • @OneVoiceMore U.S, Navy, jackass. Have you ever done anything but run your mouth and make a fool of yourself? I didn't think so. Its always good to expose another America hating ignorant leftist for the morons that they are. Thanks for playing.

  • @bluegsp US Marines. Thanks for the ride, swabby.

    Sure have, but neither of us is doing anything here but running mouths.

    You're just deluded that yours runs true.

  • @bluegsp Sum it up, slow-coach:

    "Republicans will fail again." It's the only thing close to the truth you've said.

    So, I can be patient, while you'll need to spout off again, threatened by any idea that isn't one you've borrowed from fascists.

    Watch and see. And it will be MONUMENTAL failure, just like Bush's regime.

  • @bluegsp And I can sum you up much more succinctly.

    You're a neo-con.

    (Pause for general scornful laughter.)

  • @OneVoiceMore How many phone calls have you had wire tapped? You are the one that is drunk. You have lost no rights and Bush has kept your ungrateful un American ass safe for 4 years. Obama is continuing all of Bush's foreign policies because he hasn't a clue how to improve on them. My sky is blue on planted earth. I suspect that everything you see is brown because you have your head so far up your ass. XD

  • @bluegsp Here's the fun part! I don't KNOW how many calls I've had tapped, and neither do YOU! We don't GET to know that, and if someone does know, and tries to tell us, they can go to prison for five years! FREEDOM RULES!

    What color is the sky on your home planet?

    Actually, one foreign policy, waterboarding has been discarded. Obama's ineptitude doesn't JUSTIFY Bush's.

    THAT's the partisan drone tactic when one of your party favors gets criticized, turn the tables. Topic was Bush. Keep up.

  • @OneVoiceMore Unless you were making calls to the middle east and using selected language that a computer is programed to pick up, NONE.  I have already dispatched your nonsensical babbling s about Bush and shown that your "alternative" is a complete joke. Try to focus, its like trying to have a conversation with a 4 year old that has eaten too many paint chips

  • @bluegsp I'm sure you're convinced that everything you say is true.

    HR6304 makes pretty certain that no one's going to be able to PROVE it's being abused. But one might ask, why would pre-emptive legislation keeping people from suing private companies be NECESSARY?

    This isn't a debate. You believe what you believe.

    I have a pair of eyes not blinded by partisan dogma.

  • @bluegsp And if your suggestion, then, that ONLY Middle East calls are being monitored, what a ridiculously inept way to monitor terrorist cells, eh? They're ALL OVER.

  • @OneVoiceMore Seems to have worked so far, moron.

    And by the way, I am calling you a liar about being a Marine, or else like R. Lee Emery said of Congressman Murtha, "it didn't take"

  • @Chownings Here's a lesson in what's ACTUALLY funny:

    You don't say 'Bill tells the truth'. You say 'people believe what he is saying."

    Thoughtful people make that finer distinction.

    I'm willing to bet that there is part of his demographic, like me, who watch him, just to see which foot he'll put in his mouth today.

    Thinking Bill is a journalist is the equivalent of thinking the WWF is real.

  • @OneVoiceMore I guess it's the same as listening to Couric or Olberman. Bill is the most watched new journalist in the world and all you can do is put him down. I hate to see who you think is a respectable journalist?

    FOX has done a terrific job on their political coverage and their ratings prove it. One would think the competitors would try to emulate them but their ratings just keep dropping. Any smart business would change when they get crushed, why does the mainstream media ignore it.

  • @Chownings No disrespect intended but the people who would agree with the fact fox does a good job reporting on politics are generally conservative. I know my reasoning for tuning into fox is to keep an open mind and hear the other side of political issues because, Fox's bias is very blatant. Though he is the most watched analyst I much prefer one who actually makes a point rather than yelling until he believes he's gotten his point across frankly I think he's good for a laugh.

  • @alfamail2016 That is the argument that is used every time and it is completely false. Time and time again, FOX news has been proven to be the most fair and balance network on TV. You have nothing to compare it with, the main stream media is so far to the left, any movement to the right makes liberals go crazy. Just that fact that you get a laugh out of it is proof enough. Best sellers and a number one show, what more could we ask? Please keep helping the ratings, thanks.

  • @Chownings Fair and balanced, I keep an open mind but that is something you will never convince me of with Fox I apologize but there is no way a network with such outward bias can be called fair and balanced their political coverage is good however I would never call it balanced. I will continue to watch O'Reilly though because it's possible he will say something that will sway my opinion.

  • @Chownings Oh for God's sake. Network news. NEWSFLASH: It's ALL biased. And Bill is NOT a journalist. He's an editorialist. HUGE difference.

    Anyone who thinks FOX's GOP bias isn't inyerface blatant IS a conservative. I just like yanking chains of people who think either side of the aisle is different, and OURS IS GOODERER.

    But you have to admit, both sides act like trailer trash.

  • @OneVoiceMore Nope, FOX is the most balanced network on TV. Clearly you have something against the most watched network for political news. I'm very sorry this grates you so much but remember, you have many more networks to choose from such as CNN, MSNBC, ABC,CBS and NBC. I'm also sorry that the vierership of FOX eclipses almost all your networks combined. Success is tough to accept such as the Republican landslide that will be coming your way very soon. Lets see how your networks cover it.

  • @Chownings I repeat: Network news, which is kind of a joke in itself. I tend to prefer actual news, not the sort seen between drug company commercials and beer ads, but occasionally I slum the airwaves. So, I'll just concede that Bill is the king of the slumheap and make you all giddy with your 'landslide'.

    Pumpkin, I don't have any networks. I like my cable, my BBC and newspapers. That way, I get the facts before Bill has a chance to FOX them.

  • @OneVoiceMore Thanks gord, now that I know where you are coming from I see the issue. Enjoy your bias slant and I will enjoy the most balanced Network on TV. BTW, did you hear that BBC is watched by almost 20,000 people each night, WOW!!! I'm proud to be one of the MILLIONS watching O"Reilly and changing this nation for the better.

  • @Chownings I realize you're one of the millions of people who don't read newspapers. Thanks for the confirmation.

    Let me know if you need help with the big words, while you and Bill defend torture.

    The sickest, saddest part....you actually believe you're changing things, or that they're for the better.

  • @OneVoiceMore Typical lib, attack someone for proving a point. I have just won this arguement and will no longer read or respond to your useless comments. So enjoy responding to yourself, I love it when I win. I encourage you to take a look at your paycheck (if you get one) and thank a Republican for the raise they gave you. I thank god we will control congress in January, thanks to the most inept President we have ever had. A special shout out to ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN for opening our eyes.

  • @Chownings Typical Nazi. Lie through your teeth, and vilify those with the sense to call you a liar. And failing THAT, attack them.

    And, don't bother CARING if the attacks are accurate, or even adult, just be glad your mouth made sounds and they came across as tough.

    THAT'S typical of white trash with Jerry Springer/Bill O'Reilly 'critical thinking' skills.

    The most inept president we ever had, CLEARLY, was Bush, and his failed EVERY policy.

    The fact that you can't see that...evidence. Tata.

  • @OneVoiceMore Sorry but I see it as him not being inept but him being very efficient at playing inept and serving his CIA father, Big oil interests, and Halliburton, Rumsfeld and chaney

  • @OneVoiceMore Bush is the worst president? Really? How about gay Obama?

  • @Purplecatsoup30 Great input. Thanks for detracting from the conversation.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    I voted for Richard E. Nixon in 2004.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    tell me comrade, was it bush that spent us 3.5 trillion into a hole or comrade assclown

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel I'm sorry, but are you counting from when Bush spent us from a record surplus to a record deficit? Or just from the point where he is absolved of all blame for eight years of gross and criminal mismanagement, so you, in your enlightened perspective, can blame it all on Obama?

    Your patter cracks me up. You sound like badly written 1950s comic books.

    I disagree with you, because you're a fool.

    Which, in a fool's mind, makes me a communist...right?

  • @OneVoiceMore

    you mean from the republican congress ??yes??

    bush had a war to fight from the incompetence of clinton

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Your take on history, albeit twisted into parody, is comical.

    Go back one more president before Clinton, and what do we see? Oh, yeahhhhhh, a BUSH! Stirring shit in the Middle East, vilifying a man we armed with WMD, continued in the Bush Monarchy eight years later.

    Look, I realize you're a partisan molecule, and that's fine. Lots of people need to frame their lives in black v. white, us v. them, etc, to fill a void of belonging.

    Tools, all.

    That belief MAKES you a loser.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    what was a lie comrade??

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel See? You got a BUTTON TO PUSH! And I can tell your type. The more SHRILL you get, the more PUNCTUATION you use!!!!!!!!!!<---(example)

    I will call you brother, because we ARE brothers. You will call me...liberal? Communist? Comrade? Because I'm a ton smarter on my worst day than you on your best, and you HATE people that are smart, because they rock your FoxWorld with those stupid facts.

    Lie 1. I'm a communist.

    Lie 2. I'm a liberal.

    Lie 3. Partisanship MEANS anything.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    1) we are not brothers, i never saw you in my house growing up

    2) if you believe incollectivism,and you do, then you are close to commie

    3) as smart as me?? ok, what is your degree in, comrade??

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel

    We ARE brothers. Because I say so.

    You ARE a fascist, because everything you do says so.

    I don't wish to be as 'smart as you'. Lobotomies are not elective surgery, and I rather like my ability to control my saliva. You're entitled, of course, to act differently.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    twisted history, comrade??

    accoeding to who??

    not the facts

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Nixon met Mao. Deal with it. Photos, and such, they are inconvenient.

    It's a small point in the world of YouTube trivia, but, clearly, you're missing the point. Fox plays loose with facts, and there is a majority of morons who cheer them on for it.

    Let me go get your pompoms, little cheerleader.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    who cares if he met MAO or not

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel You're having trouble keeping up with the..SUBJECT OF THE VIDEO, fuckwit.

    Scroll up and read the title of the vid.

    If you don't care about the topic, why are you here again? Oh yeah, to reinforce to everyone that you're a neo-con sheep bleating your fears and hatred into the terrors of the night, all of which MUST be some communist conspiracy, which you must destroy with your comic-book-villain monologues and your...super powers?

    Tie a blanket around your neck and fly, eh?

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel And Bush rose to his level of incompetence to fight the war, which vastly superceded Clinton's. Thanks for pointing that out.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    no, comrade clinton fucked up and bin laden was able to attack us on 9/11

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel No, Tool, BUSH fucked up, as did his father, his grandfather, etc, when they were so IN BED with the Bin Ladens in business and war, Nazis, and Saddam Hussein that 9/11 was the blowback of that spook family's black ops and betrayals. But that's history, and you're not interested in learning.

    Obvious: You're a right wingnut, and when I served this country, I didn't really think I was doing it to protect your right to be a fuckwit. My bad.

    Fox news RULES! Right?

  • @OneVoiceMore

    OOHH!! the same old conspiracy theory, no fuckwit, clinton had bin laden and let him go.

    clintons lack of preparation enabled 9/11

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Congratulations, because they responded, you won. Now go along and troll elsewhere.

  • @madnesscombat5

    well, comrade, you will not dictate any aspect of this encounter, i will not leave and i will make my opinion heard

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel You don't have an opinion. You have a spleen to vent.

    Let me elevate this conversation to your level. You're a fuckwit.

    You actually manage to deplete the oxygen where you troll, but all you manage to do with your outdated view of a world that exists only in your cartoon mind is get people to laugh at your adorable antics.

    Look up 'poltroon'. See your picture?

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Oh, of course, I want you to stay. And of course, your opinion is CRITICAL to world salvation.

    Know what I'm dictating? Your response, at every turn.

    I'm a troll-baiter. You stalked my channel, so you should know that by now.

    And guess which fuckwit bit?

    ;)

    Fuckwit, you're just my entertainment this week. Dance, little princess, to the tune of your lunacy.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    i am glad i could educate you, comrade!

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel 'Educate' me?

    You couldn't even finish high school. You could educate me, yes, on how to....let's see...be half-literate, get my 'information' from Fox news, and probably how to best seduce your sister.

    Beyond that? I have houseplants that know more.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    really comrade??

    in what field could you"educate" me??

    what is your degree in??

    mine is chemistry, comrade??

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel I could educate you in English, Political Science, History, and When Not To Lie About a Degree You Don't Possess.

    I like when you call me comrade. It shows I'm pissing off the right fascist fuckwits. Lol, You're a punchline.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    my degree is in chemistry, retard!!

    history , huh??

    that is only a minor for me but i will give it a shot.

    what happened , comrade, in 1848

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel So you say. I say I don't believe you, and you right away try to shift the balance to a question for a gotcha. And no matter what, no test online is conclusive, because almost ANY question can be researched online.

    "Chemistry degree" means NOTHING to me. What discipline? What degree? Attained where? Bore me.

    Your question is moronic. You have a narrow single answer in mind, but cite neither place nor perspective. Just a 'year'.

    You haven't even the skill to TEST me.

  • @OneVoiceMore 1) really comrade,any question. ok?? research this:economics title?? Adam S military title by Al . T.M.???? this is your field after all 2) discipline?? chemistry degree??B.S. university?? DREXEL how about you comrade?? 3) 1848 - when your communist manifesto was written 4) another retarded burger flipping liberal
  • @OneVoiceMore 1) really comrade,any question. ok?? research this:economics title?? Adam S military title by Al . T.M.???? this is your field after all 2) discipline?? chemistry degree??B.S. university?? DREXEL how about you comrade?? 3) 1848 - when your communist manifesto was written 4) another retarded burger flipping liberal who pretends he is educated
  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Spamming your blather twice doesn't make it any less incoherent.

    If by Adam S, you mean Adam Smith's groundbreaking "Wealth of Nations", you're still missing making a point.

    But I do love yanking your chain, 'commie-hunter'.

    You're the most fun kind of troll to destroy. The one who keeps coming back, incognizant of his repeated defeats while he's a running punchline in a dinosaur's world view.

    For someone so American, you sure as shit fuck up ENGLISH.

    Get an adult to help

  • @OneVoiceMore

    where is that education you promised me??

    will i finally be able to flip burgers with the same sort of panache as you??

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel....LMAO!­!!! You certainly like being bent over, didkless coward.....lol.

  • @Mazeppa4

    wow!!!

    you are really moving up in the world!!

    usually your boss at BURGER KING doesnt give you so much free time??

    did you get a promotion??

    if so,good for you ,nigger, keep up the good work!!

    asst manager will soon be yours, in less than 5 years , i bet

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel....tell us about your time as a Navy Seal, dickless coward........lol.

  • @Mazeppa4

    if you are as tough as you are educated, burger flipper, even a dickless coward can beat the shit out of you

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel......tel­l us about your time as a Navy Seal, dickless coward.......lol.

  • @Mazeppa4

    sure, tell us about your degree?

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel "if you are as tough as you are educated, burger flipper, even a dickless coward can beat the shit out of you"

    That still doesn't give you a shot at the title, and NO, your vibrator does not count as a penis.

    What you lack in variety of insults, you make up for in endless humor had at your expense, while you imagine yourself the king of intellect.

    You are a PRIZE. I can tell my 8-year-old truthfully he's brighter than at least YOU.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    and yet you never answered any question i gave you, please thrill me on your historical insights?

    what is your favorite area and point in time

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Here's your education:

    First words in sentences begin with a capital letter.

    Only one question mark is used by people who do not wish to sound as shrill as a tranny with a broken heel.

    'I' is capitalized.

    Those tidbits should get you somewhere near the third grade benchmark you're striving for.

    I'm here to help you with your obvious handicap, although I admit I'm enabling your center-of-attention deficit disorder.

    Do you need some attention today? I know you're neeeeeeedy.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    so, like any good commie, you would prefer to make minor points of grammar rather than refuting points.

    you are a non degreed loser like mazeppa. go flip your burgers comrade and leave politics to adults

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Here's more education.

    The Communist Manifesto was written in 1847. That's one of those darn facts that keeps making you look stupid. You confuse publication date with literary completion.

    That's understandable, since books obviously only shore up the hide-a-bed in your trailer.

    Let me know when you REALIZE you need more education. It's pretty obvious to everyone else. Just waiting on you to catch up.

  • @OneVoiceMore

    and it only took you 1 week, wow!!

  • @ObamaIsAMarxistTowel Sorry it took a week. I rank your level of importance somewhere between popping ass-pimples and building castles out of toenail clippings.

    You're a lout, bloviating illiterately to feel better. And you don't feel better. You're stuck in a cycle of ignorance.

    It's because you're a lout, not because there's some vast sweeping 'communist conspiracy' working against you.

    Take off the tin hat, tinkerbell.