World in conflict soviet assault cutscenes 36 ending!

[sgtCbb]

Bullshit american game so ofcourse they won in their own fantasy. twats

[Venddeta9]

Werent those 2 costguards people who got caught in the fight or im just crazy

[Terminal331]

I can't believe this came was created back in 08 or 07. anyway if it was created today, know how insanely the graphics it would be... I call this game one of the best graphics in history.

[EITY10]

These guys are great!

[hunterkiller3632]

well that blows if your playing as the soviets u should be able to beat the U.S and vice virsa

[hunterkiller3632]

OMFG thats the ending wjth the russians just up and leaving WTF i am heavily disapointed they were wining and they up and leave???? i was hopin for a soviet domination ending that very disapointing :(

[usjta]

@hunterkiller3632 The Soviets were not winning. The commander dude that got killed knew that they would be defeated in Seattle. So the Americans took control of New York, destroyed the Chinese Cargo ships and killed off the rest of the Russians.

[Pornobaer1996]

Does anyone know when and if comes out World in Conflict 2

sorry for my bad english xD

[usjta]

@Pornobaer1996 There is none coming out or announced yet.

[Pornobaer1996]

@usjta ;(

[Rookie2033]

only thing missing is the american flag on a flag pole somewhere nearby and 3 jets streaking across the scene

[Strongholddg]

Oh oh oh I got it. The CD player was what could save them from the nuke, so they had to go to Seattle to get batteries in the Soviet HQ. Now the game is making sense

[Hallottable]

Urgh!!!!!!, c'mon you guys! its just a video, just sit back relax and enjoy the video.

[flanker223]

@Hallottable then what's the use of replying?

[premadebread]

does nobody realize half of these are from the original world in conflict? someone tell me im not going crazy

[Danickas0]

@premadebread

Its a complete collection of cutscenes from World in Conflict and from World in Conflict Soviet assault so I probably should name it like World in Conflict + Soviet assult cutscenes but does it matters?

[premadebread]

@Danickas0 i was just saying because I was looking for the Soviet Assault cut scenes and you're the only person who posted them. and i was just wondering if is that all of them?

[Danickas0]

@premadebread Yes every cutscene form the game is on my channel.

[ChazFoxtrot]

WE WON THE WAR FOR WHITESNAKE!

[DaUziel]

@ChazFoxtrot FFFFF YEAH America, Apple Pie, and ROCK AND MOTHERFFFFFING ROLL

[atomicdonutinc]

@DaUziel  WOOH!!

[Riderk97]

@ChazFoxtrot dude you never know you never know.... >_> heheheh...

[Commanderlouis]

hold on i thought they nuked seattle cos on another cutscene an american soldier talkin to another says "ya hear about that nuke in seattle" and the other one says "THEY NUKED SEATTLE!?"

[Sirpain1]

@Commanderlouis if you watched it fully you hear the first guy say that they are planning to if they fail

[XDivineSouljax]

@Commanderlouis didnt you hear him no but they were if they couldnt get the soviets out in time

[Panzerfan93]

seattle is ruined, but who cares they got a CD-player and defeated the russians!

fuck yeah!

[Kaoro17]

@Panzerfan93 well, i have an i pod, but i wont be able to defeat the russians, how the hell they did with a cd player?

[cody7799]

Good song to end the game with. Very good song.

[CipherTheCommadant]

Wonder what happened to Malashenko.

[proxyeva]

good i love the here i go again. it a good way to end the game .

[galaxy366]

always an pain in the ass when an game ends like this :/, no i want world in conflict 2!

thumbs up if you agree :D

[downloadgoblin]

1:16 The city is still a wreck after the battle. It would of been easier if they nuked it. xD

[gtaclevelandcity]

@downloadgoblin Yeah, its easier to just clean a big glass crater. Just use Windex.XD

[downloadgoblin]

lol, so old school. :)

[asteng454]

God those dudes are freaken classic

[GagesChannel]

Oh no they only defeated the invasion force not the whole armed forces of the soviet union

[ToniMontana4000]

mankind can destroy the world with the nuclear weapons if he want,but.........wen the moment comes ,the man press the bottom,and he will think "i am doing the the right thing ? "

[ToniMontana4000]

0:51that was so gay 1:02 the medic

[CoNarx1x]

fallout, anyone? >:D

[msr5118]

boss ending. i loved this game

[slayerk912]

this is World in Conflict no soviet assult ^^

[ArmAFan]

Who cares about nuke? At lest those two guys got CD player working :D

[ModelbuildingTANKS]

Crap, the nuke may have not come down, but considering the damage to mostly destryed buildings, and the space Needle (AKA, most important land ark of seattle), I don't think they needed a nuke :)

[RichardTaylor1800]

@ModelbuildingTANKS i lol'd

[ModelbuildingTANKS]

@RichardTaylor1800 Yeah, certainly wouldn't want to see my city where I was born and raised destroyed. lol

[muffinmanxxx321]

ummm so is the US going to invade Russia or what?

[Velocispic]

@muffinmanxxx321 I hope they make a new World in Conflict, that would be badass. U.S. invades Russia :o

[wicNKWD37]

@Velocispic With what? didnt you hear on a cutscen america dont got any soldiers left to attack?

[Velocispic]

@wicNKWD37 Oh, thats right. But a new WiC would still be pretty cool though, am I right?

[wicNKWD37]

@Velocispic Your damn right! maybee one in the midle east. ive heard from the soldiers talk russia has attacked Iran.

[Nazgul100]

thats for you to decide :/

[Kdssow]

@muffinmanxxx321

Nah, they suck too much.

What leader plans on nuking his own city?

[DevildogBK]

A strong one does....what we have been lacking lately sadly

[Kdssow]

@DevildogBK

A strong one? don't think so.

A foolish man would do it instead.

A strong and wise man would accept his defeat.

A foolish man would not.

The foolish men in the world are the most dangerous because they never give up.

[DevildogBK]

AKA are government

[dexun1847]

nope they don't. Sometimes, you have to give something up to gain something. in this case is giving seattle up to save america and possibly win the war

[Kdssow]

@dexun1847

Maybe thats so, but a Nuke?!?!?!?!

The Radiation will fade away after atleast 100 Years.

and even still it would be a cesspit.

sorry but I'd rather use a big squadron of Stealthfighters armed with expanded versions of the MOAB.

[dexun1847]

radiation??? the radiation would not stay that long... =.= look at Hiroshima..... it cleared up less than a year.

IF u use stealth fighters, they have very good AA defence and some sorta missiles which could kill them.they could cause a lot of damage, but you still need ground forces to take seattle, air forces cannot.

[XXNeonXX54]

@dexun1847 Actually we've developed nuclear weapons to the point where it would take 100+ years for the radiation to clear up. The Hiroshima explosion would be about 1/30th of the nuclear capability of ONE typical ICBM. Not to mention we have MIRVs right now.

[dexun1847]

oh i see.........

100+ years... that's horrible. But maybe america would not use those kinds... but in the conversation between General morgan and Mr.President he said he would detonate a B53 strategic nuclear DEVICE. Not a missile.

[XXNeonXX54]

@dexun1847 LOL! Haha. The B53 was one of the most powerful thermonuclear weapons ever developed by the United States. The blast effect would have a projected 100% fatality rating and the radiation would stay for about a century or so. So we're talking strong. Like take out all of Seattle and the surrounding countryside strong lmao. xD Sadly it's still commissioned by the U.S.

[hienhao]

At that time they don't have MOAB yet

They have Daisy Cutter

[ToniMontana4000]

they are gona do that in modern warfare 3

[Warlord13413]

@muffinmanxxx321 what russia?^^ the whole fucking russian army invaded seatle in this game xD

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413 thats no excuse for the United States not to counterattack those sons of bitches.

[Warlord13413]

@muffinmanxxx321 us is a little warjunkie they need war. They cant life without it;)

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413 oh Canadian i see

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413 and if someone invaded your country and began killing your citizens you wouldnt retaliate by invading theirs???

[Warlord13413]

@muffinmanxxx321 when they invade you and defeate them you want to invade them? When someone invade your countrie, enought people/soilders got killed ;)

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413 so youd let someone attack your country, destroy miles and miles of your land, damage your economy and infastucture, destroy your home and thousands and thousands of other homes AND destroy one of your cities as well as kill tens of thousands of your civilians, and thousands and tens of thousands of your soldiers and youre going to shrug it off and let them get away with it? thats the most idiotic thing ive ever heard.

[Warlord13413]

@muffinmanxxx321 when everyone is thinking like you since now we will all be dead tomorrow.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413 oh really? so vietnam is going to invade us? oh or maybe Germany! Or maybe even Japan! Youre an idiot kid, no other nation dare invade us because theyd know we'd retaliate and wipe them off the face off the Earth not because they just shrugged it off and said "its ok America! We cool!". Your knowledge of diplomacy makes you look quite unintelligent.

[Warlord13413]

@muffinmanxxx321

1. its only a game lol

2. why you cry so much?

3. We dont attack America because we are Allies?

4. War is shit?

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413

1. were talking about real life

2. very original comeback

3. hahaha yea were allies with north korea and vietnam alright. and the reason japan and germany dont attack us is because theyre scared shitless of us.

4. I agree, im not sayin war is awesome but im saying war is the answer to many problems.

[Warlord13413]

@muffinmanxxx321 it isnt. There are only Loosers in War. And the only enemie we have are the taliban.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Warlord13413 war has ALWAYS been the answer, since the beginning of time. It makes countries, fixes economies, builds alliances, and so on. Of course it does destroy destroy countries, ruins economies , and break alliances, but the nature of war and it will never be changed. War is the never ending answer to society's problems.

[natoman345]

@muffinmanxxx321 i hope. like what the hell? i thought this expansion was going to have that! i wanna fight in moscow

[Comrade4561]

@muffinmanxxx321 they can try , but they will have the same sucess as we had invading USA . Invaders never win .

[muffinmanxxx321]

@Comrade4561 haha i can tell youre russian because of the "we had". its understandable youd think that way, Russia's cold winter and maintaining a secure supply line through the arctic/ice covered oceans and terrain would be hard to do for both USA and Russians alike.

[ClearSkyTMD]

@muffinmanxxx321 Oceans never freeze.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@ClearSkyTMD do you even know what the arctic ocean looks like? Its a vast amount of the ocean that has been frozen over and melts and refreezes according to the time of the year. Thats why the ice caps have varying sizes... Im arguing with 10 year olds here...

[Dogmeat1950]

@Comrade4561 lol. tell that to the people taken over by the Romans lol.

[greyvulc]

@Comrade4561

also tell that to allied WW2 veterans, russian and american like, who took over germany both ways/

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@muffinmanxxx321 Out of the question, on their own soil there would be no conceivable way to force them into submission. If this really happened we would quarantine them at the iron curtain and wait until communism gave way then move in and blow apart rouge army factions, establish a republic, then leave them to themselves to sort the mess out. But could we fight them in their own country? No

[muffinmanxxx321]

@davedavedaveannoy1 Absolutely false. The out cry for American retaliation from not the American citizens but also from Allied nations would be so tremendous that we would have to go to war with them. And mind you, the only thing that keeps Russia from being dominated is their terrain and weather. With the new versatility and rapid deployment of modern day equipment we would be able to negate the effects of supply line stoppages and cold weather effects. Technology is a big game changer.

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@muffinmanxxx321 However, we don't know how far they are willing to go to prevent the downfall of their regime, so the use of nuclear, chemical, biological, and radiological weapons would have probably been used in defense. So there is a slight chance of going directly head to head with their military and winning, but the loss of capital, human life, and resources would make it a very very expensive and risky venture. Isolation would be the more cost effective and safer measure.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@davedavedaveannoy1 Ah yes, I absolutely agree with you on that. The risk of nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological warfare is much too great. But you must remember though, In the game nuclear weapons had already been used. This means that once nuclear weapons are used people in general become more likely to have them used or even want them to be used. Imagine the public outrage when the American people found out we had to use nuclear weapons on our shores. We'd want to return the favor.

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@muffinmanxxx321 True, buy why risk the troops, if we launched covert operations against their Gulags, manufacturing centers, and rail lines then contain them within their borders through defensive positioning of our ground units their nation would eventually starve forcing the people into revolt, where we then intervene during the chaos and establish Republic form of government. When you really think about it a nation full of angry civilians would be far more effective then our military.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@davedavedaveannoy1 Yes, thats a very smart option for us to use but that also presents the Soviets with the opportunity to regroup and attack whichever target they deem important (depending if they recover their losses in the US). This means if they need oil (if do actually starve them) they'll either resort to buy from China or invading an oil rich area (middle east, Alaska, North Africa, etc.) In this case they might use nuclear force anyways, even if we dont invade them.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@davedavedaveannoy1 The Russians, post WW2, adopted this ideology of invincibility. They think if they could beat Hitler and dismantle his highly effect Operation Barbarossa then they could beat anything. This is primarily why Russia is so dangerous, they will do anything to survive. What happens when you back a dog into a corner (us cutting them off from the rest of the world)? Well, they bite (use of nuclear weapons). I think itd be best for us to strike first then to wait for them.

[davedavedaveannoy1]

@muffinmanxxx321 All are suitable ideas, but the Soviets were very unpredictable, and this plot presents too many variables. If this did happen we would have to leave it up to more capable minds and prospect and plot all possible solutions.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@davedavedaveannoy1 Yes thats also very true. I suppose it all rested on the mental capacity of their leader at the time haha. And as you said, its all situational meaning the only way we could truly deal with this is if it actually happens but the chances of that are very minute.

[xZeRo2RaWx]

@muffinmanxxx321 us can't afford any more losses, they lost so much men, and they have to spend all of their money on fixing up america, they can't spend any more money on the war, maybe after they rebuild seattle,and the rest of america, but othere then that , america won't invade right away! And plus remember, when the russain general was sending a message to his wife, they talked about the russain people are being bombed and people are afraid to work in factories!

[muffinmanxxx321]

@xZeRo2RaWx Wait, how much of America do you think this took place in? In the game the US military quarantined the Russian invaders to an area around Seattle (they killed all the Russian in NYC), thats why the game was centered around Seattle. Therefore the US was not in ruins, people would be crying out for war. They would want the US to do the same to the Russians, they wouldn't just take this invasion lying down, thats not like an American.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@xZeRo2RaWx Consequently, the US would do exactly would it did in WW2. It would immediately switch to a high production war economy as it began producing as much as they could and recruit as many young men as they could. The US wouldnt attack the Russians immediately after, thats correct. But you could undoubtedly expect to see a counterattack in about a month or so, depending on whether or not NATO isnt already in Russian by then.

[Rhexx18]

@muffinmanxxx321 propably in world in conflict 2

[LOGANSKY6014]

@muffinmanxxx321 Soviet Union



[muffinmanxxx321]

@LOGANSKY6014 Yes that is correct. I was thinking in terms of present day at the time.

[LOGANSKY6014]

@muffinmanxxx321 i know man, and nice argument in the first question and i think than if in the next game usa join in the soviet floor maybe we'll to the lost and ya know in the game, usa let, to win the soviet union in europe, so in the europe now is the soviet union boss, they in the next game have everything europe dominated, and look that eeuu was destroyed for the red army in the suiccide try of domination of usa. sorry for my english i know is bad but i try man xd

[muffinmanxxx321]

@LOGANSKY6014 I tried to understand that as I best I could but it was hard. Nice try though, keep it up and your english will be flawless. I could see your idea being very realistic for the next game, it would be very interesting to see how it played out.

[LOGANSKY6014]

@muffinmanxxx321 yes yes because ya know man, in the past the soviet union win europe now america have revenge his honor and his politic power, and maybe the next game will be as a "survivor game" when the soviet union join again in the american floor. i hope that be a game first person.

[muffinmanxxx321]

@LOGANSKY6014 Yeah absolutely, it'd be a nice change of pace. Especially if it was a first person shooter.

[LOGANSKY6014]

@muffinmanxxx321 yeah, because it will be like call of duty in wolverine

[leopard2a6mcan]

I wonder what ever happened to Captain Malashenko.

[999cheetos999]

@leopard2a6mcan he got killed with his entire army in seattle because he got brainwashed or too angry....

[FSXplayer15]

wait, out of all that war, and russia invading the u.s, the u.s won???

[bricksoldier2]

What were you expecting?

[FSXplayer15]

well i mean, come on, russian atleast need's to take the u.s completly over first.

if u fail at an invasion it's just embarasing.

[LilATL94]

Oh yeah! WHITE SNAKE!! WOOOO!!

Great game, WIC is awesome and is the best strategy game I ever played along with Company Of Heroes.

[nespavaj]

the first mission is the best, owning Berlin is it?

My friend has this game and I've played it a bit when I was at his place and I didn't know if it was the first mission..anway ,sotrming Berlin felt quite good, im wondering if i would buy WiC SA

[Marty32]

My fave song lol XD

[LordEarth69]

this would make a great movie ending dont you thing

[LordEarth69]

I thing it ended to soon

[Reiben91]

this aint WIC SA...

[LordEarth69]

yea it is I just finished the game and this is at the end

[Reiben91]

really?? quite disappointing...

[LordEarth69]

why I thing it is a nice end those to were fighting side by side through the hole thing so it is pretty good to end it with them

[Reiben91]

yea it is indeed a good ending but using the same for soviet assault is quite disappointing

[LordEarth69]

o will I never play the first one I got the world in conflict soviet assault both on one disc

[LordEarth69]

but then agian, they just haded the other games into the first one so I guess that is why it is the same ending

[johnnyblazze911]

i never got to play soviet assault but as i can see the american won again. what does it take for them to be humbled at least once. i would have never wonted the soviets to win in real life. but what does it take for atleast gaming industry to let go of this baseless american superiority complex.

[revolrz22]

Many of the American characters die, they have to drop nukes on their own soil, yadda yadda yadda. What ending would you have preferred? All the characters die in mission 1, game over?

I understand that hating the U.S. is the cool kid thing right now, and this game lets you nuke the shit out of numerous American landmarks while having exactly zero landmarks in Europe to desecrate.

Besides, the Soviets 'mailing' themselves to America is a retarded plot in the first place.

[SgtCandy]

I hope in WiC2 for more factions/sub factions, like the chinese and the indians. And more units with a campaign that takes us around to theaters like Korea, and afganistan.

[PoselokPA]

i really hope there will be WIC 2. im really pissed how massive made Soviet Assault look like WIC2 till last moment.

[eehhmn]

Yea i wish / hope they make Wic and imo soviet assult was a really shit expansion :/

[suicidalbuddha]

in the next game i want more factions perhaps the indians, or the brits with harrier jumpjets we would own EVERYONE

[aleksey2323]

well everyone knows america will win in the next one cmon they made the game

[StyIlez]

No, it was developers in sweden from Massive Entertainment that made this game.

[crusader810]

Well that would have been a strange end to the 80s...

[cucu4chaos]

something tells me someone is going to go nuclear next game.

[dagestanec37]

the game have special effects ,,,, but i ts real not logic ,an stupid ,, the URSS will not send all they trups to america ,, and america will not tobelared dis ,,,,,,,,,,,

[kasumoto2008]

it doesn't matter now that the russians are pushed off the U.S.A, what matters more is that the People's Republic of China has joined the war against NATO and USA, which will surely tip the balance scale as China and the USSR have clearly superior ground and naval forces. So we can just hope that WIC 2 will let us play as China (2 commies vs 2 capitalism) rather than just NATO and USA teaming on USSR.

[SoManySkinks]

China and USSR and inferior ground and naval forces. They have fairly large armies, but china in particular lacks the elite western and USSR style militaries.

[J2124123]

Not to mention the Warsaw Pact countries in Eastern Europe. I think there should be an alternate scenario in which the Russians took Europe first, then the East Coast and West Coast of the US at the same time.

[deathdealer1995]

your right they suck at naval and land but the make up for it with wave assualts like china has 2million man army and ussr had a couple million at combat arms america has 1 million and west europe probably had about 1.5 million

[Dmega007]

Yea you make a good point.

[kasumoto2008]

@SoManySkinks How much do you want to bet that Quantity will always beat quality in warfare?

[SoManySkinks]

@kasumoto2008 My life.

Desert Storm.

Modern air superiority wins wars. The -only- situation where this isn't the case, is insurgency, wherein civilians are used as cover to prevent counter-attack.

PS Where the fuck did you get that?  It's one war in a dozen that simply throwing numbers at the enemy wins. You usually need better forces, and better strategy and logistics. Having more helps, but isn't that important in the end.

[Rabbit42345345]

@kasumoto2008 your joking when you say superior ground and naval forces right? You might want to put a little bit of research forth if your being serious.

[thenoobfactor]

@kasumoto2008, the US has the best navy in the world, china has the worst of a major world power, and chinas ground forces at the time were at a 1960s level of tech, they only modernized in the 1990s.

[visiblechunk]

this game is so gay there just affraid to admiit that russia owns

[RedSektion]

Agreed!

[bloppo11]

sry i didnt play this game, the russians invaded seattle in the first game and what happened then ? Did they manage to win the war against russians?

[Deehaen777]

World in Conflict and WiC:Soviet Assault are basically the same game, Soviet Assault just adds some missions where you play as Russians between missions from the main game. (so you could say it's more of an add-on)

It isn't established that the war was won however, they just managed to push the Communist Forces off the Pacific coast

[Euroman25]

God bless America !

[skyace102]

no its a mix between the original and the Russian campaign expansion

[Mesina2]

lol

You didn't spare any building in last mission. Looks like nuking Seatlle was better idea.

[skyraptor]

I wouldn't mind USA being destroyed in real life as well :D

[visiblechunk]

ya me too

[skyraptor]

what part didn't you understand, ape? :) I want USA to be destroyed in WiC2. completely.

[iplaybose]

Dont mind this guy , he was born when the parents we're drunk and hats why he is like this or maybe he was kept in a jar and then put to good use .

[skyraptor]

you were not even born - your babboon mama shitted you from her ass, you lowlife cumm eating piece of shit

[iplaybose]

Ok , im not going to waste my words with a son of a bitch

[skyraptor]

SO FUCK OFF FUCKER!

[iplaybose]

I will only fuck off if you tell your fucking mother , which she is a bitch to stop riding my cock for fuck's sake , she's been playing with it all day long jesus im tired .

[skyraptor]

wash your face baboon. it's all covered with Russian cumm.

[RexKwonDoe4U]

well put, damn commie can't see its all a lie

[skyraptor]

america is dead, bone, destroyed, burned! GOD NUKE AMERICA!

[das81]

next you swedish faggots, use some slayer or the like.

[Fistofmail]

Kinda of a poor ending but good to see the Kommisar understood that his old friend the colonel was right in seeing the Battalion on a safe trip home. Instead of taking the dumb idea of seeing a entire battalion decimated..

[TonPappa]

whats the song at the end?

[Sellos23]

that was awsome

[JinRenegade]

1:02

There goes the medic Humvee to help Webb.

[skyraptor]

hope he dies

[iplaybose]

hope you die hit by a truck

[skyraptor]

hope you die from Russian nuke

[zombiemod]

Bit of a poor ending isn't it? Using the same as the original World in Conflict, I mean.

We never know what happened to the Russian captain who shot his uncle, for instance.

[gearsofmom]

You can infer he died fighting...

[zombiemod]

I could infer that, or I could think he got away somehow, I wish they'd shown it. Quite the anticlimax.

[gearsofmom]

Me too to be honest. I think they got really lazy when they made this game, and reused wayyy too much content from the last game.

[gome900]

to be honest its only an expantion, im just glad i finished the game, lol

[9a12b]

in wic 2 i think you will hear more of the russians and then i guess you can be the chineese to =P i looking forward to wic 2 =D