if u pause the video just before the missile, sorry i meant plane ;o) hits the building, u can see that the explosion happens just as the front of the so called plane hits the building ! u can also see clearly that what ever is in the pic it is to small to be a passenger jet ! but hey that is just my view and i don't know fuck all ;o). And ultrabeat are you smoking crack ? lol inches above the ground !! you should stop watching those top gun movies
there were no marks on the ground probably because the landing gear was up and the aircraft flew straight into the building without ever touching the ground. it might have flown like inches above ground before it crashed. hence no skid marks.
What i love is that 2 6-ton titanuim rolls royce engines didn't make larger holes or damage afterall that's where the POWER is. But I heard that the 2.3Tril pentAGone money or ability 2investigate was now gone & so were some of the HONEST true AMerICAN officer'sfighting for US Constitution! Not e/1 believes in this their brand of NWO Agenda. They showed one of the picture Parts to Rolls & even they didn't know where it came from. Truth is Coming 2011!
forget the pentagon. we know that no planes struck the pentgaon, and no plane crashed in shanksville. so why should we believe that 2 planes hit the towers? OOOH, the fake footages and fake witnesses... dont believe me? do the research! THERE WERE NO HIJACKED PLANES ON 9/11/2001! this isnt a joke. every footage (which is only around 40 footages, suprising) show fake images of a plane! no physical reaction, wingless, and a gray water color image!
theres only around 25 footages. didnt you know that? if you watch these footages carefully, you can tell what is wrong with the footages and the planes. the plane isnt real!
yeh, it does look phoney , but that's just a pixel trouble...there is amateur clips where u see clearly it's a real plane... u can doubt the first, but not the second...
u can see the hole in the towers, come on, ur not helping thruth seekers with those arguments,
real truth seekers are starting to understand it. even people who didnt believe are finding out everyday. most of the truth groups are full of lying idiots for example alex jones. they claim that tv fakery discredits the movement. which is completely false. there is no physical impact. what were the towers made of? butter? btw, 500mph at 700ft sea level is impossible to do for any pilot. those fake hijackers werent even trained to fly any boeing 727-767s.
My favorite truthers are the frauds that keep claiming Mineta said he heard Rumsfeld say NOT to shoot down the plane.
If you actually read his testimony (9/11 Commission report. Pages 36-37, 42-42), he clearly says that Langley had scrambled and there WAS an order to shoot down the jet headed for the D.C. area.
About half the truthers are chronic liars, and the other half are just dumb as a box of rocks.
"steel-reinforced concrete columns and stone walls busted off ... just the same shape & size of a 757's wings"
The conspiracy twats won't show you this photo of the Pentagon, without the usual smoke & foam obscuring the first floor, because it CLEARLY shows wing damage:
tinyurl (DOT) com/3yu2hz
Gosh, you might almost think the Truthers were scum-sucking liars.
The assholes that think the Pentagon was hit by some freakin missile need to get a life, and then explain this 100-foot wide damage on the first floor of the Pentagon, with steel-reinforced concrete columns and stone walls busted off ... just the same shape & size of a 757's wings.
Missiles, also, blow shit OUTWARD, not inward, like all these columns & walls.
These little teenage zit factories ought to do some real research before babbling like monkeys.
People, move on with your lives. 9/11 did happen and it did happen the way the government said it happened. The sooner you get over this the better your life will be.
Im perfectly willing to entertain the notion of a conspiracy......... but this "evidence" is loose, badly documented and completely unconclusive, even in showing any disparity. You cant tell anything useful from this and "eyewitnesses" (the LEAST reliable of all evidence) were attempting to keep a keen eye on an aircraft going as fast as its engines would carry it - looking only at the last second.
"eyewitnesses" (the LEAST reliable of all evidence"
But still hundreds of them (probably thousands, but hundreds that we can put names to from interviews) agreed that it was a large commercial passenger jet. A couple thought it might be a commuter plane.
Of the ones that had a good look -- like the pilots, esp. the ones that followed it in from Dulles Apt -- they all ID'd an American Airlines 757, which is exactly what the recovered parts match up to.
I hope this guy doesn't do CSI for a living! Never mind, this person can't have a job, he has to much free time on his hands and obviously doesn't have an education.
You've got to be kidding me! You idiots are giving the Bush administration WAY TOO MUCH CREDIT!! You cannot keep hundreds of conspirators that quiet! Bush couldnt even come up with one little peice of chemical weapons in Iraq when he had to. Their NOT THAT GOOD!!!
look, it'd take too many insiders for the government to pull this off. you cant have police, every member of the media, the airlines, all atc, every member of the fbi, cia, etc.. it'd be a huge thing, there would always be someone to get some sort of word out. the government doesnt control everything, it'd be impossible. and if they did, that'd just be more people that would have to be involved.
also, from the ground images, and all the foam on the ground,it's hard to tell if there is actually any marking on the ground. some of those images were ground level from hundreds of yards away. plus, the security cam does not look altered to me. you'd have to prove it with more of an aerial view. plus i heard the aircraft came down at like a 60 degree angle.
ok well let's see. im no expert either, but if the pentegon was designed to resist these kinds of attacks to an extent,which in reality, it did do a pretty good job of, then: wouldnt it be tough enough that when the plane hit,parts from the front of the plane before the explosion would break apart and fly backwards as if they bounced off of the building?
I hate to break it to you (no I don't) but none of the videos show the plane hitting the lawn before the building. The plane hit light poles, an engine clipped something but the plane didn't hit the ground.
I would like to point out that many officials say the plane disentegrated like an aluminium can, hence no engine parts or bodies etc found at the pentagon. If it disentegrated on impact how the f::ck could it go through 12 walls or whatever it was! it has to be a missile , not only that , arial photos before the pentagon attack show a markered line directly aiming for the wall where the plane supposedly hit on the lawn.
There are 3 A3 Rayethon planes missing from the inventory of an aircraft maker , these planes are identical to witness accounts,and photos of the parts found. The planes are alot smaller than a 757.
Sure man , I have the magazine at work, I will let you know tomorrow (monday australia) the info was from a magazine i brought a few months ago called UNCENSORED the magazineis produced iin New Zealand, you could go to the website aswell.
Damn liberals trying to make us think that terrorisim is not a problem again. If they had let the eye witness speak it would have ruind thier plan of having everyone believe that it wasn't the terrorists. also as you can see at 4:29 the shadows don't line up at all and the bottom one is getting more light, indicating that the biulding shaded part of the closer, top one while the farther away bottom one is getting more light because it is farther away and the building isn't in the way.
Witnesses are allways full of ideas of they thought they saw. There is always discrepencies and people change their mind when they hear what really happened. The guy who says he saw the nose of the plne crumple up as it hit... has better eyesight than any person ever could have. He is adding to his recollection of what happened.
see the wheels of the plane in the froth??let me guess they were planted in seconds. Take thousands of ppl to be in collusion to cause all this consipiracy.give it a rest,JFK probably was a consipracy,go dig that out.
Another alarmist at work. Get a life and stop using scare tactics pretending to be an American. There were no marks on the lawn because the plane flew a few feet above the ground as it impacted...dummy! I'm sure the terrorists on board didn't think about lowering the landing gear. You are such a #### disturber. Get out of the USA.
You can't see the plane hit the Pentagon because the frame rate of the security camera is too slow. Nothing more mysterious than that. Sorry. If you think it's faked, tell that to the families of the victims.
and the third plane that crashed is a mystery all in itself. those people in the towers that died deserve to rip and have the true killers brought to justice. the only way that can happen is if you ignorant sheeple stop believing everything youre told insted of researching it for yourself and coming to a conclusion on your own. and stand by it. 9/11 was planned so many things could come to pass.
Now you said APPEARS, now say that right there. obviously the plane (referring to your object of destruction there) was low but you can look pretty close and believe what you want but if I wanted to do the most damage to the pentagon I would get a parallel to the ground but not reduce the speed of the plane by skidding it on the ground. Not saying want to kill my fellow Americans but just stating what i see form your gathered footage brings me to a different conclusion.
everyone shutup we got attacked who cares if we tried to cover something up all that matters that we saw what happened and we have troops over there still fighting argue about that and shut up
it does matter if we attacked ourselves,I have 6 family members overseas fighting for something we probably did to ourself. So it matters to me if the truth comes out.
What fucking dumbshit would attack itself and then blame it on another country just to start a fucking war!!!! Kill thousands of our own to kill thousands we dont like????? what kind of shithead would use that tactic????
what a bunsh of morons!!!!!!! ok!!!! where is the plane!!!! don't tell me,,, is still flying!!!!! we lost 4 planes that day,,,,quit the dreaming and quit making shit up!!!!!!!!! what happened to your brains???
Well I do have one question, if we were on high alert then why wasn't the missle defense system activated on the roof of the Pentagon, to shoot down whatever was flying at it. Don't most of the federal buildings in D.C. have some sort of anti-aircraft defense system on top of them, if so why didn't they activate especially on a high alert day? I'm just posting a question i'm not stating anything as fact. 8-)
Cuase Bush Now that the pentagon whas bombarded :S But he dont wanted it to defense it :S Jus tlike the WTC. if you see that Pics and Movies you can see a explosion before its hitting the building so there was a bomb-rocket on boar dof the plane :S And you can see spy-Planes.... AND A Building whas collapsed AFTER the Impact 4 hours after it... And nothing hits that building. So.. there were bombs but they Activated to late
The supposedly jet engine from the airliner shown in the photos released by the gov't was in fact an engine from a Navy transport plane! There was no plane in the hole in Pa according to the coroner sent there! And FAA shows that plane to still be flying according to the ser. no.!
I wanted to believe the stories we were told, Because I served in the Air Wing Division of the US Navy, Guess I WAS brainwashed so I listened But the things I saw didn't support the story, I was there for the rescue, body recovery,demolition, and rebiuld I LOVE my country BUT Fear my government is exactly the way I feel
Yeah, right. And everyone knows Carl Rove created hurricane Katrina with his DOD weather machine. Thanks for the masterful piece of work, Herr Goebbel.
hello people fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch<----known
member of bohemian grove! And fully illuminati just like Ted Turner remember it was Fox news Followed by CNN that announced W the winner after ALL of the other stations gave it to Gore! We all said it whether in our heads or out loud " what if it comes down to Florida and Jeb", then it did! How many coinsidences can one group of people be apart of in 8 years? the aswer is as many as we let get away with!
Another BS conspiracy theory about 9/11. Having participated in more than a few air accident investigations, it is quite obvious that the author didn't do his homework.
One question then, what happen to the airplane if it did not crash and where are the people from that Flight. Are the hidding somewhere for the Gov. and their family's just think they have died. You are a jack-ass.
cont. Maybe people would rather believe it was a plane and not a cruise missile that hit the pentagon so not shatter their vision of the US and the govt. However, living in the DC area, I remember numerous eyewitness accounts as relayed to local media in the ensuing months that they say a commercial jetliner and not a missile.
I think the people who are labeling themselves as "truth-seekers" should be a little bit more tolerant of criticism. After all, where is the "scientific method" in only hearing one side?
I just wanted to clarify something... you believe that a plane DID actually hit the Pentagon? Wouldn't be surprised if people start blaming YOU for being brainwashed/threatened by the government...
FBI, CIA, Men In Black, Members of the masons lodge where all there, the people who kept appearing on the news where all actors covering it all up. In 2010 there will be another attack like the previous 911 attack.
I guess the people who witnessed a low flying commercial airline flying over I-395 are all liars or in on the conspiracy? Where were the CT'ers in D.C. that day?
Just by looking at the eyewitness accounts I'm sure even you can tell how much a memory can be altered, especially during a traumatic and stressful event. Studies have been done to show that, over time, people can be made to "remember" the details of an incident in their childhood or how a particular event happened. Eyewitness accounts are extremely unreliable but, unfortunately, they are considered accurate accounts, even in a court of law.
I understand what you are saying. But these eyewitnesses were not children and over time, I figure, is over many many years, like from childhood to adulthood. Some of these eyewitness accounts were taken within a year of two, at the latest.
Over time can actually be a period of seconds. To prove my point, try one of those "what's different" memory games where you look at one side for 30 seconds, then look at the other side and try to figure out what changed. And in those, it's a full 30 seconds you've got to see the event... I'm thinking the crash was less than that.
For proof of this in adults, Bush himself "remembered" the plane crashing when the media asked him about what he was watching at a certain point in time, even though the media hadn't even published the a video of the actual crash at the particular time that he was allegedly "remembering" accurately. It's called a "snapshot memory".
On the other hand, I understand what you're saying... if we can't beleive what we remember/see, then why bother remembering? Well, it's worth it to remember things (memories are the stuff of life blahblah... etc.), but not to have so much faith in it to the point where we should use it as hard information for a case.
Get a life losers, just because your life is very boring, doesn't excuse you from playing quasi-detective with your sub-scientific reasoning. Next time use some actual fact and some actual scientific method.
you can call us 9/11 truthseekers nuts or whatever you want, but that does not take away the fact we have mountains of evidence to support our claims.
As a learning pilot, this is a stupid and pointless video, of course it didn't leave a trail on the lawn, it didn't hit the ground, it hit the building! a shallow angled dive can be deceptive, it looks like it is on the ground when in reality it is distant, factor in the camera's height and it looks like it hits the ground, but it does not! and who are you going to believe a whacko or the NTSB
ill make a prediction, youtube wont last much longer if more people start seeing this stuff, they wont let it happen, why doesnt it get covered in the news? because they control the news, who stands to gain from the new world order? who really runs the show? dig people dig
Hmm. Kinda gay. Not impressed. But then again, I'm not an expert in Plane-crash-into-building-ology. The security camera displayed Sept 12, 2001 17:37. I was under the impretion it all took place Sept 11 at 9:41. I find that little bit the most interesting thing of all.
So let me ask all of you liberal conspiratist believing folks...where did a fully loaded American Airlines B757 go?
Let me explain something else. The fact that we as true Americans (the very few that commented on here - mpp101), have more facts to back up the fact that this was a genuine terrorist attack rather than some stupid conspiracy gives you no right whatsoever to call yourself "truthseekers". Grow up and quit trying to get famous.
if it crashed into the building then where did this fully loaded and very large planes part go to? there have been plane crashes, big one a few years ago in pittsburh area, huge crash, plane parts everywhere torsos strapped into their seats, no arms head or legs just torsos. the plane that crashed in pa, wheres all the parts? it just turned to dust like the plane that hit the pentagon. they want you to think the conspiracy people are nuts, its time we open our eys to the hard truth
OK - notice the flyover image from the satellite, pre 9-11? I think it was taken 9-7 or something. See the scour in the grass, exactly the path of the [whatever] traveled, if it did? Someone (persons - 'grounds crew') could have made a small trench - killing the grass in that line & buried some sort of electronic or some kind of thing that helped the missile/drone whatever - home in correctly - whatdyathink?
I think it is very interesting that this mark is in the lawn. One thing I find very interesting is that it is weird that the "pilot" hit the vacant side of the PENT, but that exact path would have taken the aircraft to the Whitehouse
As for the camera being off-date, I have a question; Do you own a camera?, do you own an old camera? have you ever wondered why it says: december 3 1997? do you have a VCR? have you ever wondered why it keeps flashing 12:00? Do you have a clock or a watch that was made in a different country where timezones are different? ta-da! gimme a cookie.
Yeah, because clocks that haven't b een set yet are usually out of date and always flash 12:00 as default until you set the time and date. Give him back the cookie!!!
You know what...if you are so convinced the GOVT STORY IS TRUE. Then why are you even bothering to watch movies with such titles. I don't watch the people who bash the "truthseekers" because those videos are a waste of time. In other words, you know there is some mystery out there and you just can't handle it. Go hijack a plane and hit your target on the first try.
Dont watch the movies then. Why would you watch the movies if it was making you sick? It's better to tell them what really might of happened then the BS the GOVT has to say.
I am getting sick of people who criticize those who offer a better explaination. Go ahead believe that 4 arabs hijacked each plane with box cutters.BUT why would the government not release better footage of "AA77 hitting the Pentagon" (not the blurry object video) because they claim it was a matter of national secutity, the crime was already commited, the government already claims that their secutiry sucks so might aswell release a clear video of the terror they allowed to happen.
Your a complete dumbass. Go back to area 51 and look for UFO's. Dipshit. Oh yeah, and watch out you paranoid piece of crap, the government is out to get ya!!!!!!!!
You know, if you would read the update in the title (about section of the video) that had been there for a long time, maybe that would have made you more content about the video. That is why I had put "update below" in the title! ...
"Second clip of some major evidence that is circulating that can prove American 77 may not have hit the Pentagon. If anyone who watches this can provide answers that explain these anomalies...then so be it.
UPDATE: These anomalies have been reviewed and it now appears that after review, a 757 and possibly AA77 actually did hit the Pentagon. The whole point to these productions was to get info and anomalies out there which debate could help find the truth regarding 911. (less)"
Oh and by the way, you "can't have a job" either because you have the time to watch and comment on people's "youtube" videos. You definitely don't have an eye for detail, just like most conspiracy theorists, you ignore some information and only look at what benefits your case. Oh and not to mention you cut up people who have evidence against your case. I did an investigation on anomalies to find out what happened and I actually found conclusions that went against most of them. Who's dumb?
If it was AA77, they certainly would have shown ONE of the videos....sooooo.....
THEY are the ones FORCING us to become therorists of conspiracies.,,,
Now turing citizens into suspects as it's goal...
MrNoblemanoflove 2 months ago
if u pause the video just before the missile, sorry i meant plane ;o) hits the building, u can see that the explosion happens just as the front of the so called plane hits the building ! u can also see clearly that what ever is in the pic it is to small to be a passenger jet ! but hey that is just my view and i don't know fuck all ;o). And ultrabeat are you smoking crack ? lol inches above the ground !! you should stop watching those top gun movies
OldskoolFool99 2 years ago
there were no marks on the ground probably because the landing gear was up and the aircraft flew straight into the building without ever touching the ground. it might have flown like inches above ground before it crashed. hence no skid marks.
ultrabeat0 2 years ago
How do we know if the amatuer videos are real. They could be people paid by the government to put these fake videos out.
Dmidgette1 2 years ago
I hope your not implying my video :p, because they didn't pay me, they asked and I agreed!
TinneseeTV 2 years ago
@Dmidgette1 How do you know you have a brain? It sounds like a rattle can to me.
gumpdydumpty 3 months ago
What i love is that 2 6-ton titanuim rolls royce engines didn't make larger holes or damage afterall that's where the POWER is. But I heard that the 2.3Tril pentAGone money or ability 2investigate was now gone & so were some of the HONEST true AMerICAN officer'sfighting for US Constitution! Not e/1 believes in this their brand of NWO Agenda. They showed one of the picture Parts to Rolls & even they didn't know where it came from. Truth is Coming 2011!
CORPARANOID 2 years ago
do you mean george bush lied ?, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!.WE CAN'T TRUST OUR GOBMENT.
leftjab19 2 years ago
forget the pentagon. we know that no planes struck the pentgaon, and no plane crashed in shanksville. so why should we believe that 2 planes hit the towers? OOOH, the fake footages and fake witnesses... dont believe me? do the research! THERE WERE NO HIJACKED PLANES ON 9/11/2001! this isnt a joke. every footage (which is only around 40 footages, suprising) show fake images of a plane! no physical reaction, wingless, and a gray water color image!
chibangin007 3 years ago
come on, the planes in the towers were real, there's lots of AMATEUR video...
i agree with u on the pentagon, and Shanksville....though.
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
theres only around 25 footages. didnt you know that? if you watch these footages carefully, you can tell what is wrong with the footages and the planes. the plane isnt real!
chibangin007 2 years ago
yeh, it does look phoney , but that's just a pixel trouble...there is amateur clips where u see clearly it's a real plane... u can doubt the first, but not the second...
u can see the hole in the towers, come on, ur not helping thruth seekers with those arguments,
but again, i agree with u otherwise :)
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
real truth seekers are starting to understand it. even people who didnt believe are finding out everyday. most of the truth groups are full of lying idiots for example alex jones. they claim that tv fakery discredits the movement. which is completely false. there is no physical impact. what were the towers made of? butter? btw, 500mph at 700ft sea level is impossible to do for any pilot. those fake hijackers werent even trained to fly any boeing 727-767s.
chibangin007 2 years ago
"Does anyone wonder why the first video released of the Pentagon impact is date 09/12/01?"
No. that silly question has been answered so many times we're just bored shitless with it.
Hint: It wasn't time-travel.
ChopperSix 3 years ago
At its heart, 9/11 Truth is a conceit, a narcissistic pipe dream for a sheeplike population that imagines itself dangerous and ungovernable.
Rather than admit to their own powerlessness and irrelevance, Truthers instead flatter themselves with
fantasies about a secret ruling class keeping the truth from The People.
It's like something cooked up by a bunch of teenagers raised on texting, TV and video games, who thought V for Vendetta was a documentary.
OsakaMadeek 3 years ago
My favorite truthers are the frauds that keep claiming Mineta said he heard Rumsfeld say NOT to shoot down the plane.
If you actually read his testimony (9/11 Commission report. Pages 36-37, 42-42), he clearly says that Langley had scrambled and there WAS an order to shoot down the jet headed for the D.C. area.
About half the truthers are chronic liars, and the other half are just dumb as a box of rocks.
OsakaMadeek 3 years ago
"steel-reinforced concrete columns and stone walls busted off ... just the same shape & size of a 757's wings"
The conspiracy twats won't show you this photo of the Pentagon, without the usual smoke & foam obscuring the first floor, because it CLEARLY shows wing damage:
tinyurl (DOT) com/3yu2hz
Gosh, you might almost think the Truthers were scum-sucking liars.
legalboxer 3 years ago
The assholes that think the Pentagon was hit by some freakin missile need to get a life, and then explain this 100-foot wide damage on the first floor of the Pentagon, with steel-reinforced concrete columns and stone walls busted off ... just the same shape & size of a 757's wings.
Missiles, also, blow shit OUTWARD, not inward, like all these columns & walls.
These little teenage zit factories ought to do some real research before babbling like monkeys.
legalboxer 3 years ago
People, move on with your lives. 9/11 did happen and it did happen the way the government said it happened. The sooner you get over this the better your life will be.
Planeguy13 3 years ago
Oh shit the music...
callasexperience 3 years ago
I think the this was all staged..
my theroy was that they needed the oil.
they were going to have a pipeline deal with alqida or however you spell it .
alquida refused and they needed a way to get into alquida and the oil so they staged that to blame alquida and saddam.. thats was there plan..
Decapitator9000 3 years ago
Im perfectly willing to entertain the notion of a conspiracy......... but this "evidence" is loose, badly documented and completely unconclusive, even in showing any disparity. You cant tell anything useful from this and "eyewitnesses" (the LEAST reliable of all evidence) were attempting to keep a keen eye on an aircraft going as fast as its engines would carry it - looking only at the last second.
Draconai 4 years ago
"eyewitnesses" (the LEAST reliable of all evidence"
But still hundreds of them (probably thousands, but hundreds that we can put names to from interviews) agreed that it was a large commercial passenger jet. A couple thought it might be a commuter plane.
Of the ones that had a good look -- like the pilots, esp. the ones that followed it in from Dulles Apt -- they all ID'd an American Airlines 757, which is exactly what the recovered parts match up to.
One witness even saw passengers.
legalboxer 3 years ago
Does anyone wonder why the first video released of the Pentagon impact is date 09/12/01?
Tony56841 4 years ago
tony - The time reference is a post 9/11 overlay. It is not from the original video. Come on!
Unklebillybob 3 years ago
I hope this guy doesn't do CSI for a living! Never mind, this person can't have a job, he has to much free time on his hands and obviously doesn't have an education.
mikethalman 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your a piece of shit!!!
excitemed 4 years ago
You've got to be kidding me! You idiots are giving the Bush administration WAY TOO MUCH CREDIT!! You cannot keep hundreds of conspirators that quiet! Bush couldnt even come up with one little peice of chemical weapons in Iraq when he had to. Their NOT THAT GOOD!!!
johnmeyr 4 years ago
look, it'd take too many insiders for the government to pull this off. you cant have police, every member of the media, the airlines, all atc, every member of the fbi, cia, etc.. it'd be a huge thing, there would always be someone to get some sort of word out. the government doesnt control everything, it'd be impossible. and if they did, that'd just be more people that would have to be involved.
blastpast80 4 years ago
i also believe the media doesnt know everything. they make up lies, or get information from a source that is not as credible as they make it seem.
blastpast80 4 years ago
also, from the ground images, and all the foam on the ground,it's hard to tell if there is actually any marking on the ground. some of those images were ground level from hundreds of yards away. plus, the security cam does not look altered to me. you'd have to prove it with more of an aerial view. plus i heard the aircraft came down at like a 60 degree angle.
blastpast80 4 years ago
ok well let's see. im no expert either, but if the pentegon was designed to resist these kinds of attacks to an extent,which in reality, it did do a pretty good job of, then: wouldnt it be tough enough that when the plane hit,parts from the front of the plane before the explosion would break apart and fly backwards as if they bounced off of the building?
blastpast80 4 years ago
I hate to break it to you (no I don't) but none of the videos show the plane hitting the lawn before the building. The plane hit light poles, an engine clipped something but the plane didn't hit the ground.
bambino291 4 years ago
How about a little pilot/aircaft trivia knowledge to think about?
Imagine an aircraft, wheels are up. flying with in feet of the ground, actually kind of locked into that altitude.
There is something that we use when landing and also need to lift the aircraft from. Its called "Ground Effect"
skipjackbj 4 years ago
He couldnt have flown a air plane that close to the ground going that fast
kev06073 4 years ago
duh, it says in the update that flight 77 did hit, that people who don't think it did are stupid. idiots
debunkalljunk 4 years ago
I can;t see any plane wheels in the foam.
You don't mean those cable spools do you?
qz2z 4 years ago
Did you notice the date on the video?
qz2z 4 years ago
I would like to point out that many officials say the plane disentegrated like an aluminium can, hence no engine parts or bodies etc found at the pentagon. If it disentegrated on impact how the f::ck could it go through 12 walls or whatever it was! it has to be a missile , not only that , arial photos before the pentagon attack show a markered line directly aiming for the wall where the plane supposedly hit on the lawn.
MIKESGTRS 4 years ago
There are 3 A3 Rayethon planes missing from the inventory of an aircraft maker , these planes are identical to witness accounts,and photos of the parts found. The planes are alot smaller than a 757.
MIKESGTRS 4 years ago
Can you point me toward the source of that information please. Thats very interesting.
Who was the maker with the missing A-3 Skywarriors? Thanks.
qz2z 4 years ago
Sure man , I have the magazine at work, I will let you know tomorrow (monday australia) the info was from a magazine i brought a few months ago called UNCENSORED the magazineis produced iin New Zealand, you could go to the website aswell.
MIKESGTRS 4 years ago
Sorry I meant to say A3 Skywarriors , the maker is Raytheon handsdown the silhouette is the winner
MIKESGTRS 4 years ago
Damn liberals trying to make us think that terrorisim is not a problem again. If they had let the eye witness speak it would have ruind thier plan of having everyone believe that it wasn't the terrorists. also as you can see at 4:29 the shadows don't line up at all and the bottom one is getting more light, indicating that the biulding shaded part of the closer, top one while the farther away bottom one is getting more light because it is farther away and the building isn't in the way.
PAneedsamilitia 4 years ago
Watching the explosion, No parts went flying which is a plane crashed it would.
bbthefirst 4 years ago
Witnesses are allways full of ideas of they thought they saw. There is always discrepencies and people change their mind when they hear what really happened. The guy who says he saw the nose of the plne crumple up as it hit... has better eyesight than any person ever could have. He is adding to his recollection of what happened.
TheBigGameHunter1 4 years ago
see the wheels of the plane in the froth??let me guess they were planted in seconds. Take thousands of ppl to be in collusion to cause all this consipiracy.give it a rest,JFK probably was a consipracy,go dig that out.
neilzep 4 years ago
enjoyed that part 3?
lewisdream 4 years ago
they say that the smoke you see on the right upper corner before the explosion is the plane... its acutally a misile or something.
weareNOTemo 4 years ago
Another alarmist at work. Get a life and stop using scare tactics pretending to be an American. There were no marks on the lawn because the plane flew a few feet above the ground as it impacted...dummy! I'm sure the terrorists on board didn't think about lowering the landing gear. You are such a #### disturber. Get out of the USA.
opinvox 4 years ago
Well sorry for the american people,they are justifying an injustifyable war
dalorenzana 4 years ago
Hmmmm.........too bad they can't send you over seas you retard.........can you say "friendly fucked??"
bjhw 4 years ago
One of my dads friends were neer the pentagon and saw the acsedent, BUT he did not see what plane it was and this was truly sad :(
cause that day was my uncls b-day and all he got was a big puff of smoke neer his house. :((
jessierocks96 4 years ago
You conspiracy clowns are seriously impaired. Lead based paint I suppose !
antonered 4 years ago
:O The pictures where 17:37:19/21/22/23... But where the FUck is 20???? :O
gielfransen 4 years ago
it didnt happen, just like the landing on the moon .. Its fake, IT'S FAKE I TELL YA !!!!
doh
thusse 4 years ago
You can't see the plane hit the Pentagon because the frame rate of the security camera is too slow. Nothing more mysterious than that. Sorry. If you think it's faked, tell that to the families of the victims.
Bomberguy 4 years ago
You cant see The Plane Hits the pentagon because they Dont let us see Frate 20 Theres 19 21 22 23 :S But where is 20???
gielfransen 4 years ago
nothing hit the pentagon. Its a conspiracy. period.
frederic470 4 years ago
A plane hit the Pentagon. End of conclusion.
BritishAgent 4 years ago
no plane hit the pentagon
cdi had explosives were in wtc 1,2,and 7;
and the third plane that crashed is a mystery all in itself. those people in the towers that died deserve to rip and have the true killers brought to justice. the only way that can happen is if you ignorant sheeple stop believing everything youre told insted of researching it for yourself and coming to a conclusion on your own. and stand by it. 9/11 was planned so many things could come to pass.
ampj2 4 years ago
Now you said APPEARS, now say that right there. obviously the plane (referring to your object of destruction there) was low but you can look pretty close and believe what you want but if I wanted to do the most damage to the pentagon I would get a parallel to the ground but not reduce the speed of the plane by skidding it on the ground. Not saying want to kill my fellow Americans but just stating what i see form your gathered footage brings me to a different conclusion.
2doorducky 4 years ago
everyone shutup we got attacked who cares if we tried to cover something up all that matters that we saw what happened and we have troops over there still fighting argue about that and shut up
covanantpaintball 4 years ago
it does matter if we attacked ourselves,I have 6 family members overseas fighting for something we probably did to ourself. So it matters to me if the truth comes out.
manoletto33 4 years ago
What fucking dumbshit would attack itself and then blame it on another country just to start a fucking war!!!! Kill thousands of our own to kill thousands we dont like????? what kind of shithead would use that tactic????
PAneedsamilitia 4 years ago
George W. Bush and a host of neo-con zionists thats who.
The idea is to make the crime so despicable that no one would believe a human was that criminally insane to do it.
qz2z 4 years ago
If Bush is so smart, he could pull this off to justify a war....how come he's not smart enough to get WMD into Iraq to justify the war?
Jumpa31 4 years ago
I agree with you dude! The CIA did it to cover something up.
Turboboyturbinado 4 years ago
what a bunsh of morons!!!!!!! ok!!!! where is the plane!!!! don't tell me,,, is still flying!!!!! we lost 4 planes that day,,,,quit the dreaming and quit making shit up!!!!!!!!! what happened to your brains???
SAMOTSAILE 4 years ago
Well I do have one question, if we were on high alert then why wasn't the missle defense system activated on the roof of the Pentagon, to shoot down whatever was flying at it. Don't most of the federal buildings in D.C. have some sort of anti-aircraft defense system on top of them, if so why didn't they activate especially on a high alert day? I'm just posting a question i'm not stating anything as fact. 8-)
KDAY24 4 years ago
Cuase Bush Now that the pentagon whas bombarded :S But he dont wanted it to defense it :S Jus tlike the WTC. if you see that Pics and Movies you can see a explosion before its hitting the building so there was a bomb-rocket on boar dof the plane :S And you can see spy-Planes.... AND A Building whas collapsed AFTER the Impact 4 hours after it... And nothing hits that building. So.. there were bombs but they Activated to late
gielfransen 4 years ago
the video at 3:24 says september 12!!!
perdikkos 4 years ago
the
perdikkos 4 years ago
pointless...
veggieman00 4 years ago
what the fuck is with your music dude honestly.!!!!!!
loserman30 4 years ago
The supposedly jet engine from the airliner shown in the photos released by the gov't was in fact an engine from a Navy transport plane! There was no plane in the hole in Pa according to the coroner sent there! And FAA shows that plane to still be flying according to the ser. no.!
LkOutMtnMan 4 years ago
I wanted to believe the stories we were told, Because I served in the Air Wing Division of the US Navy, Guess I WAS brainwashed so I listened But the things I saw didn't support the story, I was there for the rescue, body recovery,demolition, and rebiuld I LOVE my country BUT Fear my government is exactly the way I feel
Throttlewv1 4 years ago
Yeah, right. And everyone knows Carl Rove created hurricane Katrina with his DOD weather machine. Thanks for the masterful piece of work, Herr Goebbel.
LeSphinx2 4 years ago
hello people fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch<----known
member of bohemian grove! And fully illuminati just like Ted Turner remember it was Fox news Followed by CNN that announced W the winner after ALL of the other stations gave it to Gore! We all said it whether in our heads or out loud " what if it comes down to Florida and Jeb", then it did! How many coinsidences can one group of people be apart of in 8 years? the aswer is as many as we let get away with!
dollingroobies 4 years ago
your exactly right
manoletto33 4 years ago
how would an airplane slide across the lawn at the rate of speed it was going, and not blow up prior to hitting the pentagon?
Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Not really deception there when u put in actual physics. The plane didnt touch ground until it actually hit the pentagon.
Another question.
Why would Al Queda take responsibility for something if they actually didnt do it?
sonicboom2885 4 years ago
are u on drugs??? the plane is fying a few feet above the grass, so of course it doesn't leave a mark on the lawn!!!
nicksomd92 4 years ago
Ass
loserman30 4 years ago
Another BS conspiracy theory about 9/11. Having participated in more than a few air accident investigations, it is quite obvious that the author didn't do his homework.
giallofly 4 years ago
why does the time stamp on the pentagon footage say 9-12?
Dragon7697 4 years ago
One question then, what happen to the airplane if it did not crash and where are the people from that Flight. Are the hidding somewhere for the Gov. and their family's just think they have died. You are a jack-ass.
BrazosBoys 4 years ago
cont. Maybe people would rather believe it was a plane and not a cruise missile that hit the pentagon so not shatter their vision of the US and the govt. However, living in the DC area, I remember numerous eyewitness accounts as relayed to local media in the ensuing months that they say a commercial jetliner and not a missile.
MrTange 4 years ago
I think the people who are labeling themselves as "truth-seekers" should be a little bit more tolerant of criticism. After all, where is the "scientific method" in only hearing one side?
I just wanted to clarify something... you believe that a plane DID actually hit the Pentagon? Wouldn't be surprised if people start blaming YOU for being brainwashed/threatened by the government...
ChillyMeerkat 4 years ago
FBI, CIA, Men In Black, Members of the masons lodge where all there, the people who kept appearing on the news where all actors covering it all up. In 2010 there will be another attack like the previous 911 attack.
GreatMoviesForever 4 years ago
I guess the people who witnessed a low flying commercial airline flying over I-395 are all liars or in on the conspiracy? Where were the CT'ers in D.C. that day?
MrTange 4 years ago
Just by looking at the eyewitness accounts I'm sure even you can tell how much a memory can be altered, especially during a traumatic and stressful event. Studies have been done to show that, over time, people can be made to "remember" the details of an incident in their childhood or how a particular event happened. Eyewitness accounts are extremely unreliable but, unfortunately, they are considered accurate accounts, even in a court of law.
ChillyMeerkat 4 years ago
I understand what you are saying. But these eyewitnesses were not children and over time, I figure, is over many many years, like from childhood to adulthood. Some of these eyewitness accounts were taken within a year of two, at the latest.
MrTange 4 years ago
Over time can actually be a period of seconds. To prove my point, try one of those "what's different" memory games where you look at one side for 30 seconds, then look at the other side and try to figure out what changed. And in those, it's a full 30 seconds you've got to see the event... I'm thinking the crash was less than that.
ChillyMeerkat 4 years ago
For proof of this in adults, Bush himself "remembered" the plane crashing when the media asked him about what he was watching at a certain point in time, even though the media hadn't even published the a video of the actual crash at the particular time that he was allegedly "remembering" accurately. It's called a "snapshot memory".
ChillyMeerkat 4 years ago
lol it's bush we are talking about ;)
MrTange 4 years ago
(Fricking 500 word limit...)
On the other hand, I understand what you're saying... if we can't beleive what we remember/see, then why bother remembering? Well, it's worth it to remember things (memories are the stuff of life blahblah... etc.), but not to have so much faith in it to the point where we should use it as hard information for a case.
ChillyMeerkat 4 years ago
vaporize? jajaja
veragaona 4 years ago
Get a life losers, just because your life is very boring, doesn't excuse you from playing quasi-detective with your sub-scientific reasoning. Next time use some actual fact and some actual scientific method.
adamjjohnson 5 years ago
That white streak was smoke from one of the engines
oxomaticman 5 years ago
You have no proof LOL
choidj 4 years ago
It's a more plausible explanation than it being a missile. So tell me, what is your claim, and where is YOUR proof?
oxomaticman 4 years ago
you can call us 9/11 truthseekers nuts or whatever you want, but that does not take away the fact we have mountains of evidence to support our claims.
innerswedish 5 years ago
why does it say sept 12? didnt this happen on the 11th?
skizm22 5 years ago
As a learning pilot, this is a stupid and pointless video, of course it didn't leave a trail on the lawn, it didn't hit the ground, it hit the building! a shallow angled dive can be deceptive, it looks like it is on the ground when in reality it is distant, factor in the camera's height and it looks like it hits the ground, but it does not! and who are you going to believe a whacko or the NTSB
DerRotFreiherr 5 years ago
No, most of the vicims' families do NOT believe it was
an inside job, and most people who offer an 'alternative'
explanation are on the dumb side of Beavis and Butthead.
The Government's story is basically true, alas....
greg771 5 years ago
ill make a prediction, youtube wont last much longer if more people start seeing this stuff, they wont let it happen, why doesnt it get covered in the news? because they control the news, who stands to gain from the new world order? who really runs the show? dig people dig
wheelinco 5 years ago
Yep, if you read Media Monopoly, you will see how this country controls your minds with the media.
choidj 4 years ago
Hmm. Kinda gay. Not impressed. But then again, I'm not an expert in Plane-crash-into-building-ology. The security camera displayed Sept 12, 2001 17:37. I was under the impretion it all took place Sept 11 at 9:41. I find that little bit the most interesting thing of all.
13timz 5 years ago
So let me ask all of you liberal conspiratist believing folks...where did a fully loaded American Airlines B757 go?
Let me explain something else. The fact that we as true Americans (the very few that commented on here - mpp101), have more facts to back up the fact that this was a genuine terrorist attack rather than some stupid conspiracy gives you no right whatsoever to call yourself "truthseekers". Grow up and quit trying to get famous.
capflight4105 5 years ago
if it crashed into the building then where did this fully loaded and very large planes part go to? there have been plane crashes, big one a few years ago in pittsburh area, huge crash, plane parts everywhere torsos strapped into their seats, no arms head or legs just torsos. the plane that crashed in pa, wheres all the parts? it just turned to dust like the plane that hit the pentagon. they want you to think the conspiracy people are nuts, its time we open our eys to the hard truth
wheelinco 5 years ago
lol you're American Indian
ghostbuster2006 5 years ago
yeah but why duz this video clip say sep 12th?
xplhavoc 5 years ago
there's a new pentagon clip out . i kust uploaded it. check it out.
genghis6199 5 years ago
Hi Greg. Couple points... (breathe right strips)
OK - notice the flyover image from the satellite, pre 9-11? I think it was taken 9-7 or something. See the scour in the grass, exactly the path of the [whatever] traveled, if it did? Someone (persons - 'grounds crew') could have made a small trench - killing the grass in that line & buried some sort of electronic or some kind of thing that helped the missile/drone whatever - home in correctly - whatdyathink?
WNanette 5 years ago
I think it is very interesting that this mark is in the lawn. One thing I find very interesting is that it is weird that the "pilot" hit the vacant side of the PENT, but that exact path would have taken the aircraft to the Whitehouse
excitemed 5 years ago
As for the camera being off-date, I have a question; Do you own a camera?, do you own an old camera? have you ever wondered why it says: december 3 1997? do you have a VCR? have you ever wondered why it keeps flashing 12:00? Do you have a clock or a watch that was made in a different country where timezones are different? ta-da! gimme a cookie.
DerRotFreiherr 5 years ago
Yeah, because clocks that haven't b een set yet are usually out of date and always flash 12:00 as default until you set the time and date. Give him back the cookie!!!
choidj 4 years ago
In 2000 years there's been over 15000 conflicts but only 198 years of peace.
We are doomed! we just don't know it yet.
Peltris 5 years ago
yeah, we do know it - read Revelations.
WNanette 5 years ago
go fucking watch loose change2 and accept the fact that wtc atatcks were a big plan to get people rich.
KisForKennedy 5 years ago
You know what...if you are so convinced the GOVT STORY IS TRUE. Then why are you even bothering to watch movies with such titles. I don't watch the people who bash the "truthseekers" because those videos are a waste of time. In other words, you know there is some mystery out there and you just can't handle it. Go hijack a plane and hit your target on the first try.
excitemed 5 years ago
i think loose change was an attack on people's intelligence to get them (LC) rich.
MrTange 4 years ago
im really getting sick of these people saying 9/11 was fake. Tell that to the familys of the people who died in it.
mpp101 5 years ago
Dont watch the movies then. Why would you watch the movies if it was making you sick? It's better to tell them what really might of happened then the BS the GOVT has to say.
excitemed 5 years ago
I am getting sick of people who criticize those who offer a better explaination. Go ahead believe that 4 arabs hijacked each plane with box cutters.BUT why would the government not release better footage of "AA77 hitting the Pentagon" (not the blurry object video) because they claim it was a matter of national secutity, the crime was already commited, the government already claims that their secutiry sucks so might aswell release a clear video of the terror they allowed to happen.
excitemed 5 years ago
excitemed-
Your a complete dumbass. Go back to area 51 and look for UFO's. Dipshit. Oh yeah, and watch out you paranoid piece of crap, the government is out to get ya!!!!!!!!
mikethalman 4 years ago
You know, if you would read the update in the title (about section of the video) that had been there for a long time, maybe that would have made you more content about the video. That is why I had put "update below" in the title! ...
excitemed 4 years ago
"Second clip of some major evidence that is circulating that can prove American 77 may not have hit the Pentagon. If anyone who watches this can provide answers that explain these anomalies...then so be it.
UPDATE: These anomalies have been reviewed and it now appears that after review, a 757 and possibly AA77 actually did hit the Pentagon. The whole point to these productions was to get info and anomalies out there which debate could help find the truth regarding 911. (less)"
excitemed 4 years ago
Oh and by the way, you "can't have a job" either because you have the time to watch and comment on people's "youtube" videos. You definitely don't have an eye for detail, just like most conspiracy theorists, you ignore some information and only look at what benefits your case. Oh and not to mention you cut up people who have evidence against your case. I did an investigation on anomalies to find out what happened and I actually found conclusions that went against most of them. Who's dumb?
excitemed 4 years ago
most of the victims familys belive that it was an inside job, look at the evidence.
djlogitek 5 years ago
ok yea creeppy
Slayer95282 5 years ago