英皇攪笑教學(賭錢篇)

[shingchan940525]

呢D片 呢D故事

雖然講唔出D咩大道理

但係我睇完之後覺得非常之有親切咁

所以我高度推介呢條片比讀econ既朋友收睇

[FionaYoutub]

唔好咁挑剔啦

[angelutins]

但對方有可能係玩虛張聲勢心理戰搏你唔跟,其實佢無葵線5

[olimpic2008gordon]

judo chops!!!

[vc05349]

佢冇講錯喎

佢唔係講呢場賭局輸贏既可能性

而係解釋選擇跟或唔跟既oppotunity cost係幾多

佢由頭到尾冇建議過應該係跟定唔跟

我唔明下面果d reply點解話佢錯

[kelvinpoon123]

其實佢大傻果到講錯左,佢話投降輸一半可以拎番5百萬走,玩呢D GAME係相方一樣既賭注先可以睇下一隻牌,所以每邊係付出左5­百萬,投降輸一半應該係可以拎番250萬走,所以機會成本係25­0萬+100萬共350萬先岩,並唔係佢講既6百萬

[kelvinpoon123]

@ahmale 我係講緊佢話後面輸少當嬴果到.唔係講緊機會成本

[ahmale]

@kelvinpoon123 你仲唔明 你自己睇多次人地00:40講咩 條友掉左1000萬出去囉

[ahmale]

@kelvinpoon123 留心D啦00:40你係咪無開喇叭???

[45234589]

@kelvinpoon123 你唔係認為你會勁過佢啊?

[CR7RONALDO9]

大傻個個唔係咁解囉-_-

[sam023302]

大傻~笑死

[hsc77777]

係賭俠唔係賭神

[WinsonX]

佢假設左個賭仔會輸

[ahlokwong]

講得好亂....

[Poyekali]

好錯, 1000萬唔係sunk cost, 因為佢仍然有機會recover 返

[qwerty190619]

@Poyekali 佢assume左個賭仔跟左都會輸

[alexfree05]

頂佢把聲好煩

[knife348]

realli on 99 teacher!

[gicole]

真係俾佢吹漲, 點解我以前跟佢上Econ會無呢d動畫呢?

(不過精讀班有漫畫送, 而且仲整到本YES咁)

[540196]

呢個唔係活學厘架咩?_?

[kcleungchris]

佢以前係英皇架...

[tomkoolman]

佢講到咁撚勁... 係既話一早發左啦... 仲駛係度鳩up

[wearefdz]

大傻唔係睇到周星星隻牌知道輸梗，先話投降輸一半咩！？

原來大傻經濟咁勁架！佩服佩服！

btw，大傻RIP

[8589409]

乜戈套唔係賭聖咩- -唔通我記錯左- -?

[99782a]

更J,正常學校一開始學econ都已經知咩叫機會成本,d and s先最緊要

[tommy868]

七旋斬！！

LOL

[jimfee42]

again, he's so wrong. Each round of the bet is not independent as the winning probability changes according to the cards turned over. The $10 million should be included in opportunity cost valuation because that's the opportunity cost to win the hand and the game. Bad example. Plus, the marginal of utility plays a more important role in this case. That is the marginal utility of $1 million compared to $10 million. Senior teacher, full of shit.

[vinniechan]

there is only 1 card to complete a straight flush (5 of spades) , and he could win with a full house with 3 cards (presumably)

besides, if the other side doesn't get the 5 of spades, he's screwed. 3 of a kind beats a high card.'

simple

[weiwei6969]

@jimfee42 maybe he considers it as sunk cost because he mentioned the probably of winning is very low (or zero).

[didthghk]

唔係化？0甘都比佢大到！你真係信佢同花醇呀？佢好大可能一pa­ir都無，花蛇都唔係，你自己起碼三條，0甘都唔去輸比個拋浪頭­係好苯seven???!!! 0甘賭法輸到你PK呀！呢個局唔可以用經濟學黎計，用proba­bility黎計下佢底牌係同花醇，花，蛇，機會有幾大，你都可­以拋佢扮有夫食佢花蛇0架。

[mars9492]

原來Kevin k0以前係英皇架..

宜家個頭同以前一樣既@@"

[ray011220]

爆哂咪

[clementnarutosai]

it is not present option

[clementnarutosai]

kevin ko rules

[lilian716]

however, $10000000 is sunk cost

sunk cost is not opportunity cost

it should not alter our decision

[joeydefrancesco]

七旋斬斬斬！！斬到你眼花又好頭暈！

[mauricec87]

come on... dun link your example to pot odds when your concept to totally flawed

[hata9413]

應該從佢得到隻3既機會率有幾高, 然後先去諗個值博率, 未賭就去諗投唔投降, 咁不如唔好賭.

[bcben1986]

There is something wrong with Ko's theory!

Although the $10,000,000 on the table is not the opportunity cost, it's,in fact, the potential income of the option. $10,000,000 should be disconted to an expected value which will alter his decision to continue or not.

[jarudess]

wots wrong with his hands?

[lamchin14]

d 懶音好勁呀救命...

[alexonchu]

把聲真係麻麻地...