Added: 5 years ago
From: BlueRajah
Views: 8,895
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (90)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What a surprise...fox propoganda show as usual. Stink always leads back to these people dont it.

  • rick santorum is a bush butt licker. if you want more bush, then santorum is your guy.

  • @coolvideo28 haha...funny :)

  • @JimHinCO you wont laugh when the traitor in the white house you voted for gets fired.

  • @coolvideo28 Whom would that be? So you are both an idiot and a liar? Awesome!

  • @JimHinCO sorry your slow.

  • @coolvideo28 It's "you're" - sorry you're uneducated. :)

  • @JimHinCO HAHAHAAAA all you do is call names like a 8 year old and you have the nerve to call me uneducated. I care so I will help you. Study the Bible and you will gain a real education & learn the truth.

  • @coolvideo28 Hahahaha! You aren't a Christian if you are accusing someone of voting for someone that they didn't vote for. That is stating a lie. :) Run along now...you can't keep up intellectually but God will still love you :)

  • @JimHinCO You voted for him your not fooling anyone but lets say by some miracle you just cheerlead for him thats just as bad.

  • @coolvideo28 Again, it's "you're not fooling" - please repent. Isn't it simply easier to say, "Sorry I was an ass for the assumption" than trying to justify your initial accusation which is untruthful and a lie?

    Any idea what your Bible says about that? I've got a few hundred scriptural references if you need assistance. You realize that most evangelicals don't believe Santorum is going to heaven, right? He's Catholic!

  • @JimHinCO Thats not true at all If you are saved/born again your going to Heaven even if your catholic. who did you vote for then?

  • @coolvideo28 Ron Paul

  • @ase1972 vote for ron is a vote for obama he will never win republican nomination and if he goes independent he will split vote insuring obamas victory so you would actualy be voting for obama

  • @coolvideo28 That makes no sense since there is no real difference between the corporate owned Republicans(Romney, Newt, Santorum, Perry) and Obama. The only candidate that from a christian stand point that makes sense is Dr. Paul, if you can't see that then I suggest you study your Bible before advocating candidates that promote death and warfare at the behest of international money lenders.

  • @ase1972 You might want to check the part were it says "there is a time for war" When somone is about to get a Nuke is insane and wants to use it on US & our Allies it would qualify. ron would sit on his hands and let US die. how would you like to fix this problem after you me and our familys are dead because we had a coward in the white house. What I stated is fact ron wont win rep. nomination & if he runs independent he will split vote & obama will win a vote for ron is a vote for obama.

  • @coolvideo28 who told you he wont win the nomination? Do you know god? Read the answer to your post of ase1972 above. And maybe try for a change to evolve a tiny bit? We need every vote to get rid of the banker plague. Ron Paul 2012

  • @metropol77 Yes I do know God. No one evolves that is part of your problem falling for Fairytales like evol. ron while good on the costitution is a Nut job on foreign policy he is crazy. He also wants to legalize all drugs and give illegals social security.

  • I swear, the three stooges. Can it possibly get any stupider than what these tools just spent 3:42 talking about? These morons wouldn't know the truth if it slapped them across the face We knew there was WMD's in Iraq. Because we supplied them to Iraq to use against Iran. Duh. We also knew they were either used up or useless because of their age. Yet these tools go on TV arguing the most trivial bullshit ever discussed, and it's news. Santorum needs a WMD shoved up his frothy gay ass.

  • These mouth pieces are front rabble for the real power structure in the Republican den of thieves.

    They hijacked Jesus til he gave out, then it was birth control, then birther time, then blow hard time from the intellectually deficient that looks like the line up at Ringling Bros Circus Freak Show.

    Anything but the real issues: JOBS, The Looting of U.S. Treasury by Wall Street and Cronies and the largest tax give away in history to the super rich, all at the expense of ordinary citizens.

  • See this guy trying to use 9/11 in the debate? Pathetic. Good thing he's irrelevant.

  • Rick Scumtorum = filthy homophobic degenerate. 

  • This is not believable. We've already seen Ritter being blocked from Congressional testimony in 2002, the Downing Street Memo, et, etc and now (well as of 2006) we're supposed to believe that some kind of classified document contained some kind of proof of the WMDs. Just more yarn about how the predatory ruling class operating through gvt needs to police the world.

  • Did someone put Santorum's nose in a vice? How does he breath through that pencil?

  • Santorum & Hannity sitting in a tree..........

  • There is a webpage called "Saddam's WMD:Discovery and Denial" which shows some WMD in Iraq!

  • hindsight really is 20/20....this is total bullshit...my god Hannity just believes what he WANTS to believe.

  • I'm amazed. FOX is actually "fair and balanced" with this vicious neoconned moron Santorum and puts him firmly in his place, which, in an ideal world would be behind bars for "crimes against Humanity", but in America is merely "exposed for being a lying, spinning SOB."

    Guess that'll have to do.

  • why dont you mention the share he is recieving here these guys are great . breaking news ,

    these guys are true fact finders. thanks Holmes

  • Saddam had, and used, WMD. He WAS a lying, cheating scumbag who killed even his own people with mustard gas. Fact. So when we gave Saddam warning that we are coming after him, do you think he moved them to Syria or some other safe haven? (which would be the entire middle east, practically.) I don't understand why people put their head in the CNN/NBC/MSNBC sand.

    America: what did you think before the media told you what to think?

  • Hey, guess who gave them those weapons? And no it wasnt any mean arab country

  • Same idiotic comment I've heard hundreds of times. We gave weapons to Iraq to help ward off, at that time, an evil oppressive Iran. People change every day; and Saddam was no different. He used the very weapons we gave Iraq against us. Does that make our charity to him wrong? Given the circumstances at that time, I don't believe so. To rebut, turn on MSNBC and get more info from Keith Olberman.

  • @dave0mary

    "We gave weapons to Iraq to help ward off, at that time, an evil oppressive Iran. "

    But you also gave weapons to Iran at the same time. So you were just perpetuating a bloody civil war by playing both sides.

    "He used the very weapons we gave Iraq against us"

    Actually Saddam mainly used Soviet

    weapons against you. The majority of his conventional army was supplied by the Soviets.

    You mainly just helped with WMDs.

  • @321lawc SO WEAK. And whoever gave 'em the weapons forced them to kill innocent people with. Ludicrous.  You lose the debate. Period.

  • The point is that when we go and interfere with other countries shit and make back room deals it will come back to get us.

  • Way vague and, again, weak.

  • @TruthDroveCove - But you already knew when you were supplying the weapons that he was psychotic.

    He had already used the WMDs numerous times. Yet you continued to give them to him.

    In fact you voted against a UN resolution condemning Iraqs use of WMDs.

  • Get informed before making claims. Not U.S. gov't, but U.S. non-profit and CDC, upon Iraq's request, sent it biological samples to assist in Iraq's medical research. U.S. does not use chem,bio weapons in warfare cuz of inhumaneness. It was East Germany that provided Iraq with most of these WMD technologies. Again, you're like many other sheeple that regurgitate liberally biased media at your own peril. Fact also that Iraq was serious threat to security, evading UN; it knew U.S. was serious.

  • @Truth

    "U.S. does not use chem,bio weapons"

    I never said that.

    "Not U.S. gov't, but U.S. non-profit and CDC"

    The CDC is a governent organisation. So the Gov't did help. The CDC sent toxins that were prohibited by law using export licences approved by the US Dept of Commerce. Therefore, breaking the law.

    "sent it biological samples to assist in Iraq's medical research"

    Except Iraq didn't have a medical research center. The samples were sent to the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission.

  • It's so evident in your SKIRTING around THE FUNDAMENTAL point I made- U.S. WAS CLEARLY NOT BEHIND SADDAM'S BUILDING UP BIO/CHEM WMD / IT WAS HIS OWN SINISTER CHOICE- that you only continue to display pure biased hate toward U.S. by vilifying it. You CANNOT support that U.S. wanting to help Iraq in its peaceful, preventative medical research by sending it samples of maladies such as anthrax and smallpox was "UNLAWFUL."-NONSENCICAL! Blah blah blah. FACE IT! You WANT U.S. to be the BOOGIEMAN!

  • @Truth

    But you didn't send it for medical research. They don't have a medical research facility. You sent it to the IAEC who were building the WMDs.

    " You CANNOT support that U.S. wanting to help Iraq in its peaceful, preventative medical research by sending it samples of maladies such as anthrax and smallpox"

    Except that smallpox doesn't exist any longer in the world. It only exists in labs.

  • Oh, so Iraq had NO honest scientists interested in honest medicine? Sure. Again, you're implying U.S. KNEW Iraq would weaponize the samples. Again with your villanizing U.S. Disgraceful.

    Scratch "smallpox." There was the plague and West Nile, diseases Iraqi's could be susceptible to. Hinesight's 20/20. Saddam turned out to be quite the monster, sadly. But your implying U.S. knowingly provided him WEAPONIZED germs/gas to murder w/ is disgusting, like 9/11 & now, even, Haiti "Truthers"

  • " Scratch "smallpox." "

    Why should it be scratched? The fact is that it was given to the Iraqis and the only use is to be made into a biological WMD.

    Other viruses such as the dengue virus were given even though it doesn't exist in the Middle East.

    "so Iraq had NO honest scientists interested in honest medicine"

    But they didn't send it to a medical facility. They sent it to the IAEC which built WMDs. I am not sure what is hard to understand.

  • "Scratch smallpox" cause I cited incorrectly. I've found nothing that states U.S. sent over smallpox. So YOU now alleging U.S. DID? LOL If so, what's your source? What's its credibility?

    Oh, I understand... the University of Baghdad received scientific samples! You've "conveniently" left that entity out, haven't you? Your SOOO focused on continuing to villainize America, that you also have continued to evade clearly explaining how America is ultimately responsible for Iraq's WMDs...

  • "So YOU now alleging U.S. DID?"

    You said that the US did send smallpox over. Why would I dispute something that you said was true?

    Do you think I was check through the huge list of viruses to ensure that you were correct?

    "the University of Baghdad received scientific samples!"

    Wait, was it the medical facility? No, because they don't have medical facility. Like I said before.

    Why would send live strains anyway when you already have vaccines for them?

  • Again.  Look back. I said I CITED INCORRECTLY, regarding smallpox. What's hard to understand about that?? Laughably but predictably, you hijacked it like it was fact, cause it helped your argument. LOL. Pathetic.

    So Iraq was SO unindustrialized that medicine and its research did not exist there? Wrong.

    Samples of virus/bacteria were sent to Iraq for them, themselves, to develop vaccines, giving them their autonomy in that arena. So hard to understand??

  • No, you just said "scratch smallpox".

    I thought you meant it in reference to the previous sentence that smallpox viruses were sent for preventing diseases.

    I originally responded saying that Smallpox no longer exists. Hence, it cannot be sent with the purpose of preventing medical disease.

    Therefore, I thought you meant "scratch smallpox " in reference to it was sent for use in preventing medical disease. Not in reference to that it didn't exist at all.

  • "Your SOOO focused on continuing to villainize America, that you also have continued to evade clearly explaining how America is ultimately responsible for Iraq's WMDs."

    I am not sure if I am trying to villainise America. America does what is best for itself and plays geo-politics.

    How am I avoiding the question of why America is responsible?

  • You're not sure? LOL. Either you are or aren't? LOL.

    You're unable to connect dots, while, all the while, insinuating that America provided germs to Iraq KNOWING that Iraq would weaponize them. Again, disgraceful, unsupportable defamation. Your just another bloke on the block HATIN ON America. Doing "what is best for" a nation, for the U.S., does not mean promoting inhumane biological / chemical weapons use in war and / or genocide. Again, U.S. does NOT conduct that kind of atrocity...

  • @Truth

    It was unlawful. Some of the list of virus/bacteria were on the Commodity Control List when they were sent with the approval of the Dept of Commerce.

    That is illegal. Hence, they attempted to remove the bacteria/viruses from the CC List after they were sent to Iraq.

    It is all in a senate inquiry in 1995 headed by Don Riegle. The head of the CDC said they were on the CC List.

  • "Some of the list"? So YOU say. Your go-to-Lib, Don Riegle- scandal artist- aimed to discredit Reagan administration that protected world from and effectively defeated Communism. Politics. Typical. Blurt out all the crappola you want. There's a big difference between KNOWLEDGE and WISDOM. The wise GET the tactics of Liberals and their deception, frankly based on jealousy. The wise recognize GOOD when they see it.  Finally getting rid of Saddam was a GOOD thing. The REST is all NOISE!!

  • " "Some of the list"? So YOU say"

    I am just repeating what your congress is saying. It was in a congressional inquiry in September 2002.

    There is a testimony from the head of the CDC saying that he sent banned strains of viruses/ bacteria.

    This is also backed up by the export papers which list the viruses.

    Check for yourself. It is all on congressional record.

  • @dave0mary

    Except there is no evidence that Syria has any of these huge WMD stockpiles and neither is there any credible intelligence to suggest that WMDs were moved.

    The best you have is a book written by an Iraqi General who left Iraq in 1991.

    Actually, there isn't any evidence that Saddam had a WMD program after the mid 90's.

  • He is right. The left has brought us nothing but family destruction, immorality, drugs, crime, shall I go on??

  • A classified document that he just held up on national TV...wow.

  • @QuantumStates WEAK. Did you see the classification stamps on the paper. Nope. Talking out of one's ass is disgusting. You lose the debate.

  • Classified document fail lol

  • 500 chemical weapons that US gave them. in the 70s and 80s

  • DEPORT RICK SANTORUM.

  • A group of GOP must be called a flock of dumbfucks!

    Now the hypocracy is that the Republicans are crying foul because all their scandals, corruption, and poor service records have come to light. This floating turd and Congressional asswipe declassify documents to take advantage of their few supporters ignorance.

    Hopefully on 11/9, pRick will get a nice break from politics and he can go to Iraq and continue his search.

  • Did that idiot just hold up a classified document?!!

  • santorum IS a desperate fool, doing anything and everything he can to try to save a failing reelection bid.

  • Santorum thinks WMD are a pile of crusty mustard gas containers from the 70's! Gee, what does the classified parts of the report include? Mesopotamian arrow heads? What a jerk: a jerk to think the public is that gullable!

  • I love Sean Hannity! He jumps on anything,no matter how retarded, to support his boy. He's nothing more than a propogandist. This information is old, worthless, info that he should have known was insignificant. Bravo Sean! You blew the lid off another one! What a dumbass.

  • unbeleivable naivete. ridiculous idiots. keep voting them in!

  • Ups...Guess I should've watched the whole clip before posting my comment:D

  • "...I'll show you the classified document, it's right here...". Excuse me?! Showing classified documents on tv, even if it was for a second, is in my mind against some laws.

    And yes, they found mustard gas and sarin, but the chemicals were old, useless and not the nuclear ones United States and it's allies went to war for.

  • Anyone who believes that Iraq had WMD (post 1991) is an absolute sucker! All of you apologists for the Bush team need to get a dose of reality and do some critical thinking (which I know conservatives are almost unable to do).

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=hQk3Pu5uJrM&mode=related&sear­ch=

  • ^^ haha, that's because it's BS mr

  • Amazingly all the other major media outlets have been silent about this......Nice black eye to the Liberal media.

  • none of the media is liberal. none of the media is conservative. they all pander to the same idols...dollar fucking bills. billions of 'em. all it takes is research. not blind obedience. this country was founded by guys who decided to become terrorists (yup, boston teat party was a terrorist act by definition) so they could be rid of tyrants. we are now, again, taxed without representation and lied to on a daily basis.

  • amen to that devatron! amen to that. Its the biggest laugh ever that we are still taxed without representation. BTW media is not particularly liberal or conservative but Fox News is straight up propaganda

  • Santorum is a bitch.

  • Since when has WMD been "partially" the reason went invaded Iraq?

    These tools are shameless...

  • From the very beginning. The WMD have been confirmed, per numerous investigations, as well as his butchery and support of international terrorism.

  • Specific sources, please(as far WMDs and links to 9-11).

  • WHAT numerous investigations. Fox News's? You're nuts.

  • Jesus, what a pack of Republican liars. The Defense Department, two days after this video, stated that Santorum and Hoekstra's "WMD"s are old missiles from BEFORE Desert Storm in 1991. They just make up anything and pretend it's true. Fucking monsters.

  • amen !!!!!!!

  • You are the one that is lying if anyone is. Santorum and Hoekstra (the intelligence committee chairman) report was backed by the Defense Department's highest ranking official.

  • One month later, story is gone... Santorum looks like a fool...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more