At 5:54 you comment on LandingApollo's claim that information is widely available on the internet, by saying that Ralph René doesn't use internet.
The comment was addressed at you, not Ralph René.
Although LandingApollo says this information is widely available on internet, it is not the only source. Non-use of internet cannot be used by René as defence against any accusation of poor research.
"Although LandingApollo says this information is widely available on internet, it is not the only source. Non-use of internet cannot be used by René as defence against any accusation of poor research."
And where exactly do you expect him to get it from? NASA? It took them nearly two years for them to send him the photographs he requested.
At 5:19 you pause LandingApollo's video at the point at which he says you should have spent more time researching. As a counter you talk about Ralph René's letter.
Are you presenting René's letter as evidence that you did spend more than 10 minutes researching? Or is it that you are distancing yourself from any criticism by laying the blame on René?
Jarrah, you still haven't understood. The 2.5 min burn was used to accelerate the CSM out of lunar orbit. ie to accelerate from 3600 mph to around 5000 mph.
Apollo 13 was never in a captured lunar orbit. It was already approaching the moon at about 5000 mph. It didn't need a burn equivalent to the CSM 2.5 minute burn, because it was already going fast enough.
"It didn't need a burn equivalent to the CSM 2.5 minute burn, because it was already going fast enough."
So if it was already going fast enough, why commence the TEI burn in the first place? How can a shorter and less powerful burn than what's normally used to propel just the one craft have any effect on both vehicles which together has double the mass?
The A13 TEI burn was made so as to either increase the speed, and/or refine the trajectory so as to get them home faster.
Do not confuse the A13 TEI burn with the normal TEI burn, which was used to accelerate the CSM from lunar orbit at 3600 mph to about 5000 mph. The velocity change required on A13 was not of this order.
The TEI was used to accelerate the craft to get them home faster. It wasn't even necessary. They did it to get them home faster and change the Splashdown site.
By the way Jarrah, do you honestly think you can calculate fuel consumption by doubling the mass and thus fuel required? Your fuel calculations make me laugh lol.
MOON HOAX -In order to insure huge government grants Nasa will continue to carry the moon walk farce into the Mars hoax farce while a country of morons praises movies like, In The Shadow of The Moon. SUCKERS
"If the world's astronomers can truly be that incompetent(...)"
Happens all the time Jarrah! Just look at the official story for 9/11! I don't remember how many people were tracking the flight that hit the Pentagon, but they just couldn't! It's a human "error" I guess, just like for Proton-4... I'm kidding of course. They lied for both and still are doing so! And they sure don't mention Israel's implication in it.
At 5:54 you comment on LandingApollo's claim that information is widely available on the internet, by saying that Ralph René doesn't use internet.
The comment was addressed at you, not Ralph René.
Although LandingApollo says this information is widely available on internet, it is not the only source. Non-use of internet cannot be used by René as defence against any accusation of poor research.
apollotls 4 years ago
"Although LandingApollo says this information is widely available on internet, it is not the only source. Non-use of internet cannot be used by René as defence against any accusation of poor research."
And where exactly do you expect him to get it from? NASA? It took them nearly two years for them to send him the photographs he requested.
WhiteJarrah 4 years ago
National library in Washington, for instance.
apollotls 4 years ago
At 5:19 you pause LandingApollo's video at the point at which he says you should have spent more time researching. As a counter you talk about Ralph René's letter.
Are you presenting René's letter as evidence that you did spend more than 10 minutes researching? Or is it that you are distancing yourself from any criticism by laying the blame on René?
apollotls 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Or is it that you are distancing yourself from any criticism by laying the blame on René?"
Funny.
WhiteJarrah 4 years ago
Jarrah, the question is serious. I don't understand the comment you made at that point in your film. Could you explain a bit more?
apollotls 4 years ago
Jarrah read what the newspaper article says
"Moscow Sunday - Russia launched a 17-ton cosmic laboratory Proton 4 into orbit yesterday"
So Proton 4 was launched on Saturday 16th November, don't you think?
apollotls 4 years ago
Jarrah, you still haven't understood. The 2.5 min burn was used to accelerate the CSM out of lunar orbit. ie to accelerate from 3600 mph to around 5000 mph.
Apollo 13 was never in a captured lunar orbit. It was already approaching the moon at about 5000 mph. It didn't need a burn equivalent to the CSM 2.5 minute burn, because it was already going fast enough.
apollotls 4 years ago
"It didn't need a burn equivalent to the CSM 2.5 minute burn, because it was already going fast enough."
So if it was already going fast enough, why commence the TEI burn in the first place? How can a shorter and less powerful burn than what's normally used to propel just the one craft have any effect on both vehicles which together has double the mass?
WhiteJarrah 4 years ago
The A13 TEI burn was made so as to either increase the speed, and/or refine the trajectory so as to get them home faster.
Do not confuse the A13 TEI burn with the normal TEI burn, which was used to accelerate the CSM from lunar orbit at 3600 mph to about 5000 mph. The velocity change required on A13 was not of this order.
Thanks for the thumbs down by the way.
apollotls 4 years ago
"So if it was already going fast enough, why commence the TEI burn in the first place?"
Why try to get them home faster you mean?
Beacause they were 3 men in a spacecraft designed to hold 2 men for 40-odd hours.
apollotls 4 years ago
The TEI was used to accelerate the craft to get them home faster. It wasn't even necessary. They did it to get them home faster and change the Splashdown site.
By the way Jarrah, do you honestly think you can calculate fuel consumption by doubling the mass and thus fuel required? Your fuel calculations make me laugh lol.
LandingApollo 4 years ago
MOON HOAX -In order to insure huge government grants Nasa will continue to carry the moon walk farce into the Mars hoax farce while a country of morons praises movies like, In The Shadow of The Moon. SUCKERS
EGMAG 4 years ago
"If the world's astronomers can truly be that incompetent(...)"
Happens all the time Jarrah! Just look at the official story for 9/11! I don't remember how many people were tracking the flight that hit the Pentagon, but they just couldn't! It's a human "error" I guess, just like for Proton-4... I'm kidding of course. They lied for both and still are doing so! And they sure don't mention Israel's implication in it.
AzraelEngel2 4 years ago
Oh dear Pukebaguk 'tally hoo old chap' seems to be at odds with aerospace engineer and photography expert Jay Windley.
Sat/ISS=UFO or does it not?
greenmagoos 4 years ago
this as a lot of people running and looking to find different data to counter you jarrah, lol.
great work bud.
eggnation 4 years ago
Nice work Jarrah !
The Apollo "propagandists" sure do trip themselves up in their web of lies , don't they ?
Ralph Rene' was right about these guys ... There is no talking with them, as none of them know how to be honest about any of this.
straydog02 4 years ago