Added: 2 years ago
From: 911oz
Views: 20,887
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,053)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Richard Gage is funny. First he says thermite was used to bring down the towers because its silent and would thus disguise the demolition. Then he turns around and claims only huge detonation charges could have ejected steel beams so far.

    Hahahahahaha!

  • @thx1138aa It could generate low explosive pressure which is nowhere as loud as a super sonic high explosive. Why would the buildings 1,2 and 3 (3 not even being hit by a plane) collapse through the path of greatest resistance at near free fall into its own footprint. My cousin died in the collapse of the North Tower. He deserves the truth to come out and justice to be served as all of the victims do.

  • @thx1138aa no idiot,he clearly says that thermite was used to quietly cut the crucial core columns,and conventional explosives were most likely used due to the pulverization of 40,000 cubic yards of concrete & other materials..He also states that nanothermite can be combined as an incendiary & an explosive..yeah so look at what you type before you post something so you don't look to foolish..

  • Could we even trust the Military Tribunals to be fair and just if shadows were cast even on the Military. It seems to me that your operating on a cancer that can't be cured, you just let it die. Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice shame on me

  • @JesusNonEnviromental Well said. ;-)

  • Just stop and think if the 911 Conspiracies are proven to be true and exposed to the World. The Entire Government would have to come before a Military Tribunal including the White House; Congress; CIA; FBI; Home Land Security; Private Corporations; News Agencies. America would collapse in its own footprint and would be thrown in Economic Collapse, Wall Street would collapse; Foreign Loans and Investment. America would be labeled a Terrorist State and placed under embargos. The list goes on

  • There were no planes on 911. Dimitri Khalezov proved it to us.

  • As expected, no answer to my question "what can cause a 2.25 second freefall [in WTC 7] over the span of 8 floors, as acknowledged by NIST, considering that 'gravitational' destruction takes time"? Freefall, by definition, means no structural resistance AT ALL. Ergo, the building cannot have destroyed itself. 80 support columns cannot suddenly give in without ANY resistance over multiple floors.

  • @Finnquirer Easy answer - freefall would be caused by blowing the shit out of the building with explosives. Anybody who argues otherwise (like the retarded fuckwits below) are simply cunts nervous at confronting the truth.

  • Comment removed

  • The emotive debunkers are here in force with this one, shrieking about 'twoofers' like red-faced schoolboys angry at their babysitter.

  • 75,450 DOLLARS

    Richard Gage's salary in 2009 from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. That's according to the 2009 Form 990-EZ available right now at GuidestarDOTorg, an online organization that helps track non-profits.

    The total revenue for 2009 -- 344,570. Salaries for Gage and others topped out at 107,417. That means salaries constitute 31% of AE911Truth's expenses.

    In other words, Richard Gage's salary is 21% of all revenue received by AE911Truth in 2009.

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • @ctcole77

    Dimitri Khalezov explains 911.

    Ground Zero = Place of an atomic bomb explosion! Nanothermite DOES NOT EXIST!

  • gage is a disgusting liar

  • So why is it that Richard Gage and his cronies do not talk abut the distributions of steel and concrete in the towers. Don't skyscrapers have to hold themselves up? Doesn't gravity work the same way all over the planet. Shouldn't the distributions be pretty similar among all really tall buildings?

    So why isn't this resolved among structural engineers and physicists all over the world?

    watch?v=ZT4BXIpdIdo

  • By "gravitational" destruction below I obviously refer to the claim that parts of the building destroyed other parts. Such destruction would have taken time and thereby would not have progressed in free fall, during which no destruction can take place. Simple physics, which conforms to controlled demolition, in which some (obviously, not all) of a building's floors are removed by explosives. In the case of WTC 7, the number of removed floors appears to have been 8.

  • @Finnquirer

    Dimitri Khalezov explains 911. Ground Zero = Place of an atomic bomb explosion.

  • @Finnquirer

    Dimitri Khalezov explains 911. Ground Zero = Place of an atomic bomb explosion.

  • Regardless of the origin of the office fires - fires that, according to NIST's earlier report (as shown by chrissarns below) had burned out well before the onset of the destruction in the area where NIST later claimed the heat started the collapse - no random fires can result in a perfect controlled demolition. Simple question to OCT believers: what can cause a 2.25 second freefall over the span of 8 floors, as acknowledged by NIST, considering that "gravitatioonal" destruction takes time?

  • I wonder, does anyone take Richard Gage seriously anymore after all his erroneous statements?

  • The fire that supposedly started the collapse had burned out over an hour before the collapse. NIST stated in their 2004 preliminary report on pg 26, that they had a photo showing that the fire on floor 12 had burned out by about 4:45 pm. An analysis of the photos and floor plan shows that the fire had burned out about a hour and a half before the collapse. truthphalanx[dot]com/chris_sar­ns/

  • @ ctcole77 Most of Hanjour's instructors said he was a horrible pilot. Though he had "some ability", even professional pilots have said they couldn't perform the maneuvre to hit the building at near ground level with the speed observed. Same with WTC maneuvers: a number of professional pilots tried that in a flight simulator and almost always failed (the towers were narrow targets considering the recorded speeds). P.S. You can find an answer to you "How many" question from the AE911Truth site.

  • it was all made in hollywood........

  • The recent Siena poll shows about half of New Yorkers wanting a new investigation into WTC 7. No wonder: it matches a highly skilled controlled demolition; the research material was destroyed before investigation began; and NIST had to acknowledge a 2.25-second freefall, meaning that there was ZERO structural resistance in the span of 8 floors. Zero resistance means NO crushing of structures, which a "natural" collapse would require. In a CD, SOME of the floors are always removed by explosives.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Since demolition experts estimated it would take 100 men 6 months to place explosives in WTC 1, 2, & 7, how come no one witnessed any strange construction, wires, or boxes?

    How can Operation Northwoods be an example of "false flag terrorism" if it never happened?

    If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts & how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

  • @ctcole77 First, google "People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11". Lots of demo professionals agree that what matches a highly skilled controlled demo can only be one. No wires needed for controlled demolition nowadays (duh!), and WTC occupants HAVE testified about strange construction in the weeks before 9/11. Planes: probably remotely controlled (maneuvres exceeded professional pilots' skills). Northwoods was a PLAN; e.g. Operation Gladio and Gulf of Tonkin were actual false flags.

  • @Finnquirer

    Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot, said chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard of Freeway Airport. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."

    911 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!

  • @EvanQuinn07 Actually, it is very difficult to find architects, engineers, or demolition experts who think that office fires alone could demolish a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper (but few have been asked, let alone interviewed). Google "People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11". Don't forget that the final official explanation for WTC 7 says that fires alone were enough to level it to a compact piece of debris, floor by floor into its footprint. (as in a perfect controlled demolition)

  • I meant to write: "compact PILE of debris". The official explanation says that ordinary fires alone resulted in what matches a perfect controlled demolition. But no random damage - be that from office fires or from debris - could ever mimic a perfect controlled demolition. Otherwise we'd not need the VERY expensive services of CD companies. Setting up fires, optionally complemented by random damage to one facade, would do the trick.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1500+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?

    What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?

    Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?

  • @ctcole77 Many of the signatories at AE911Truth have expertise in those areas, incl. controlled demolition - cf. "People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11". As WTC 7 fell without ANY structural resistance for 2.25 seconds (as NIST admitted but did not explain), all the 80 support columns must have been removed as in a CD. "He could not fly at all" was what one instructor said about Hani's flying skills, while others noted he had problems controlling a single-engine Cessna 172. Some ace!

  • @Finnquirer

    I ASKED A SPECIFIC QUESTION. HOW MANY?

    I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7had NOTHING to do with the collapse?

    How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade?

    How about the southwest corner of WTC chopped off?

    Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead?

    Please explain how WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station and how that effected the collapse?

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • @ctcole77 Random damage to a building cannot produce what matches a perfect controlled demo. Moreover, in its final 2008 report NIST explained WTC 7's demise by office fires alone. The alleged, but never clearly documented, south side damage and the diesel fuel were forgotten. NIST claimed that the fires caused an "unprecedented event": thermal expansion of a central column - no 79 - which failed, after which all the other 80 columns also suddenly failed (NIST doesn't explain how that happened).

  • @Finnquirer

    No, that's not what NIST's repot said. You might know that if you actually read it. If you go to NIST's website titled "Questions and Answers about WTC 7's Collapse" you can read how the columns failed. Sorry, I know how much 911 twoofers don't like to read. The fires in WTC 7 were caused by falling debris from WTC 1 & 2. Now, how about answering the questions SHILL?

    Finnquirer DEBUNKED!

  • @ ctcole77 To quote NIST lead WTC 7 investigator Shyam Sunder: "Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event. Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down." NIST says ordinary fires, not damage or diesel fuel, destroyed WTC 7. There's clearly no point in continuing this.

  • @Finnquirer

    "Debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was 370 feet to the south, ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors-7 through 9 and 11 through 13-burned out of control. These lower-floor fires-which spread and grew because the water supply to the automatic sprinkler system for these floors had failed-were similar to building fires experienced in other tall buildings."

    911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

  • @Finnquirer

    I sure you "forgot" to mention that NIST said debris from WTC 1 started the fires.

    911 Twoofers are great at fact picking.

    911 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!

  • so to gasp and wonder why?,why?would a government do this to its own people is to deny history,the realistic world geopolitical mechanisims.Its about resources,power and money,very few powerbrokers have ever been motivated by much else,particularly in the modern corporate era when multinationals almost dictate policy to world powers with aggressive lobbying.America has become a vessal for an elite with a slightly fashist tainted view of the world.John kennedy would be turning in his grave.

  • 9/11 was a false flag operation just like ''the gulf of tonken'' incident that got america comitted to vietnam fully after its execution!.The resukts were to enter afghanistan and stop the pipeline the tailiban were building with the pakistanis and so the CIA could also get control of the export of opium in that country which has risen by 90% since the invasion.the invasion in iraq was also built on lies and that is well documented also.major powers have being doing this throughout history>!

  • why does this pin-head emphesize the point that #7 wasn't hit by a plane? it WAS Heavily Damaged though from falling debris

  • @EvanQuinn07 According to the final official explanation published in 2008, the destruction of WTC 7 was caused solely by fires. "Thermal expansion" caused column no 79 to break, which then caused the other 80 columns to also somehow break in seconds, and then the skyscraper collapsed in a way that any controlled demolition company would be extremely proud of. And the investigation of the unprecedented total skyscraper collapse was preceded by a speedy removal of all the research material...

  • @Finnquirer maybe that's true, to be honest because I'm not here to cover-up or pretend I know everything, I haven't read the final report from NIST, what I'm basing my opinion on is the way #7 was constructed, with the cantelever, where it was damaged and the fact it did burn all that day, even though I think the fires weren't that great

  • @Finnquirer ...explosive-like material that only the military or gov't could get....that's REALLY a stretch...besides thermite is not an explosive like one would think, it's used to burn, it burns really hot and fast, BUT slower than you'd want if you were imploding a bldg, IF gage was really onto to something earth-shaking, don't you think more of his collegues would be too? he likes to throw out that number of how mant A&Es have signed on....

  • @Finnquirer thats a very small number of the total of 233k architects & 2.5 million engineers in the US, that makes me question gages' motives too....he presents it like MOST of his peer community are behind him, they're NOT, and the way he mentions #7 "it was never hit by a plane" and he stops there, it WAS HIT by falling Debris and WAS Damaged...but he never says that.....he spins things, reminds me of those "loose change" Fools

  • I think Richard really believe in controlled demolition! He seems convinced in my eyes! But why he ignores that at least 10 story's of the south side of wtc7 was taken out from the north tower? I saw it with my own eyes! I was standing near winter garden as it collapsed!It also lean to the south after a fall of 25-30 story's, ok nr.7 had a 6 story high concrete foundation, this could be the solution& it doesn't damage any other nearby building, this was suspicious!

  • if anyone is gonna send me a message, i dont hate america or bush etc, im no conspircacy theorist but none of the official report adds up, alot of vital info has been ignored or covered up, and when you think about why the goverment would do it theres so many incentives and its not the first time a government have commited a crime on its own people in order to promote their propaganda. theres no answers and there wont be, but facts point in the direction of corruption and an inside job.

  • @TheJJGillespie

    I do believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Next question is why?

    These videos are worth watching. It could be wrong but it's quite well made.

    watch?v=pNjb1MGmGDc

    and

    The Hate Mongers Among Us

    watch?v=cxnbngV_zOg

  • Military explosive thermite was found in the dust which brought the buildings down, that was ignored. Its waste product molten iron was seen by fireman, they denied it. Building 7 came down without being hit, that was ignored. Media create a moral panic over "war on terror" to put fear into people, this fear distract them from problems with the economy while america quietly go to war (which they fabricated themselves) get oil, boost the economy, "kill" bin laden and all is good in the world. USA

  • @TheJJGillespie The thermite paper has never been published in an independent peer-reviewed journal.

    NIST wrote a report on 7, and the knowledge in it has helped buildings resist fire more.

    Say, how did the explosives survive getting hit by an airplane and an hour of fire?

  • @EGRJ because the core columns were cut near the bottom and the plane hit the top. If you see the core columns at the bottom after the demoltion, their cut at an angle which is how columns are cut during a demolition to bring the building down. littlefires on 2 floors wernt hot enough to melt the structure of building 7 and bring it down in that way, freefalling into its footprint. Molten iron was found which is produced by thermite yet the goverment denied witnesses seeing it when fireman did?

  • @TheJJGillespie The columns were cut by rescue workers with torches. The "little" fires were producing giant clouds of smoke visible from the ground. The OS says that steel was weakened by heat, not "melted", 7's footprint doesn't include the Verizon Building or the roof of Fiterman Hall, which were across the street from it in two separate directions, it's only freefall if you ignore the E. Penthouse, and even trained metallurgists can't recognize molten iron by sight.

  • @EGRJ the fire were only on 2 floors and they werent exactly raging fires coming out of the windows. we could do this for days and even with the facts and evidence i know you wont change your mind cause you obviously dont want to believe it. im no conspiracy theorist, i dont hate america but when i see facts from experts and flaws in a major event which is being ignored it raises suspicsion, the japenese feel its a hoax too.

  • @TheJJGillespie okay idiot you have no clue what your talking about. I don't give a shit if your Japanese friend said it was a hoax, bottom line thousands DIED that day and these conspiracy theories are Garbage. Ignore all the stupid math and insinuations coming out of this mans mouth, and think, A PLANE!! CRASHED!! INTO!! A BUILDING!!!!! What is the first thing that comes to mind. Nothing happens it'll be fine:).....NO bull shit!! Its ass is grass and going to the ground.

  • @Chromebully im the idiot? you believe people who live in caves managed to plant thermite in the world trade center buildings? cause thats what brought them down haha its not a conspiracy because theres facts! government are ignoring all these important FACTS. you can sit there, call me an idiot and deny it all but thats your opinion, obviously some peope arent open-minded and refuse to believe a government wouldnt be so corrupt. need a reality check mate, watch the zeitgeist link then reply.

  • @TheJJGillespie You know Osama was a Civil Engineer, right?

    You're not accusing "the gov't", you're accusing thousands of people, including FBI agents, cops, firefighters, military men, people who would give their lives for the public good. All of whom, you allege, just turned their back on the murder of 3K people.

    I don't have that kind of cynicism.

  • @EGRJ thermite was found in the dust, its biproduct molten iron was found by fireman (not acusing them of anything) yet "the govt" denied witnesses seeing it to cover it up. all i know is, theres many flaws in their story, too many coincidences, overwhelming evidence of a controlled demoltion, their explanation of the collapse was wrong. fbi took 80 cctv footages of the "pentagon crash". no luggage or seats and the plane "vapourised" haha scientiffically impossible, bodys were identified though?

  • @Chromebully type zeitgeist movies into google, first link, watch the 2007 movie from 40 minutes in, explains everything, if you still believe im an idiot after watching it you must be the idiot to brush all those facts and "coincidences" aside. everything your arguing for is what you've been told but have no real idea about, what im arguing for is backed up. i dont hate america or their government but the facts speak for itself.

  • @TheJJGillespie v=ukO3hENZ9zA#at=3m58s

    Yep. Just two stories.

    I've asked questions. I've done research. The OS may be flawed, but it still holds up. There are a lot more experts who agree with the OS than disagree. There is no call for an ad hominem.

    You still haven't answered how the explosives survived. Either they wouldn't have survived, or their remains would've been found in the wreckage. No boom-boom.

  • @EGRJ go onto zeitgeist movie .com, youtube wont let me post the link but click on the 2007 film, watch from 40 minutes in and enlighten yourself. its only 30 mins long.

  • @EGRJ /watch?v=0kW35q0BghM

    

  • @MMIIXX So an abstraction when speaking to laymen and the public is a "lie" now?

    What "military grade" devices were you referring to?

    How did the wiring and detonators survive, then vanish?

  • Richard Gage turns out to be just another conspiracy kook. He claims the firefighters and police had advance notificaiton of the "detonations." Sure, that just makes a lot of sense that they were part of the plot that killed hundreds of their own. What a nutcase.

  • Experts that are only saying they see unusual occurrences (based on their skill set ) happening on 9/11 that require further investigation.Why do "debunkers" object to further investigation ?

  • @MMIIXX Because of the big picture. Any attempt to fit conspiracies into a narrative form, an actual theory of the crime, quickly starts looking ridiculous. EG: Nanothermite. Thermite burns slowly and chaotically, and the bad guys would need split-second timing. That leaves explosives, which would be loud enough to cause hearing damage as far as a half-mile away. There were survivors IN the towers who didn't hear it.

  • @EGRJ sorry to burst your bubble but "Nanothermite. Thermite burns slowly and chaotically" is incorrect .If you do a little research you will find thermite cutter charges DESIGNED to cut steel beams .

    A little knowledge is a dangerous weapon and it's also ignorant !

    No offense but do you have any science or engineering skills or qualifications ?

  • @MMIIXX Good question! First, what are *your* qualifications, since you're going to play that game? Oh, right, you only need "common sense", while your opponents need PHDs before they know what they're talking about.

    v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M

    Look at the size of that thing. And that's just to burn through a piece of rebar, not a steel structural support. This is where you say nanothermite would be smaller, without any proof whatsoever.

  • @EGRJ I have been involved in engineering my whole professional life .I have trade quals as a "coppersmith" and worked as a electronics technician for over twenty years and now I design and build Superconducting Magnets for NMR and MRI etc. . I know a little about material sciences and construction methods. So I'm not going to " play that game".

    And your skill set is what ?

    Military grade devices are different to what is seen in your vid.

    Now what is your engineering experience ?

  • @MMIIXX "The game" I referred to was appeal to authority. Gage has been able to gather 15K people to his cause. There are over 1 mil people in those professions in the US alone, and 17K more entering the workforce every year.

    Also, you just admitted that you don't actually have any real architectural or structural engineering experience.

    How did the detonators and wiring survive the plane crash and fire perfectly, but not turn up in the debris field?

  • @EGRJ you have failed to mention YOUR "engineering experience" at all.

    To admit to being a "truther" is like painting a target on your back. I applaud the courage it takes for those one thousand five hundred engineering professional for risking their status for the truth.

    If you are trying to be reasonable tell me why four times more money was spent investigating Bill Clintons sexual affair with an intern than was spent investigating the murder of over three thousand innocent civilian !

  • @MMIIXX 1. Appeal to Authority.

    2. Someone being widely considered wrong doesn't automatically make them right.

    3. You're equating the $14 mil the 911 Commission got with the ENTIRE Clinton investigation. The 911C was a secondary investigation, not the primary.

    bit ly/yi2z1

    4. What "military grade devices"?

  • @MMIIXX What "military grade devices", exactly?

  • I cant believe anyone still considers the government version as being the truth.

    Rumsfeld was quized during an interview a few weeks ago about building 7; his reply was "what was building 7?"

  • @tofty21 Do you have any idea how many Building 7th there are under the purview of the United States gov't? I'm guessing a lot.

  • If you shills want to debunk something why aren't you urging the Government to perform chemical testing for explosives and thermite on WTC Debris and Dust?

    That would end the scientific debate then and there. "Experiment is the arbitrator of competing hypotheses" - Galileo

    Just show us the science and the proof that no bombs were used and all these conspiracy theories will go away. If you can't then you must be hiding something and the conspiracy theories are probably true...

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

    Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?

    How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?

    If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?

    If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

  • @ctcole77 And if the charges survived the plane impacts, why isn't any of their debris visible in the wreckage?

    How did they "aim" WTC 1 debris at 7 to give them an excuse?

    If NIST's report is nonsense, why has knowledge gleaned from it helped new buildings stand up to fire better?

  • @EGRJ

    This isn't a game show SHEEP.

    There's no need to phrase you answers in the form of a question.

    911 TRUTH = REFUSING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT DEBUNK YOUR MAGICAL THEORIES

  • @ctcole77 Those are all questions that must be addressed by any theory of the crime. Most of them cannot be answered by any truther, on account of being physically impossible, yet the "truth-seekers" won't even try. In fact, it's odd to actually find them stating a complete theory, for some reason. Ad hominems won't change that.

    There are just far too many random variables and impossibilities for the conspiracy to be pulled off successfully.

  • @EGRJ

    GREAT JOB - at NOT answering the questions!

  • @ctcole77 thank you!!!

  • @WarCrime911

    ö

    Do u demand release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?

    He loves the 9/11 Truth movement...

    Just like your buddy M.A.

    /watch?v=K2xn8-aBrp0

  • @WarCrime911 So if the gov't said they found no NT, T, or explosives, but refused to let anyone independent test it, would you think that they were hiding something?

    Oh, and they did have bomb-sniffing dogs at the scene, which turned up nothing.

  • @WarCrime911 Because any explosives, detonators, and wiring would've had to survive a plane crash and hour or more of fire, yet vanish from the debris field picked over and photographed by thousands.

    Also, thermite doesn't burn fast or reliably enough for the split-second precision needed.

    Also, any explosive strong enough to cut a steel beam would be clearly audible. We're talking hearing damage. People *inside* the buildings during the collapse didn't hear it.

  • @WarCrime911 Starting with the fact that thermite-or thermate, or nano-thermite-is unreliable, conspicuous, and relatively slow, and any explosives strong enough to do the job would cause blast injuries. There were people *inside* the towers who didn't hear said explosions, and were pretty much safe. Also, said explosives would be audible up to a mile. That's thousands of people and just about every news camera with a mike on the scene, and a good way off.

  • @EGRJ they said the fires weakened the floors which caused one floor to fall, bring down the next and so on. If that happened the core columns would've still been standing. For the buildings to collapse like that the core columns must of been cut simultaneously, under the wreckage the core colums were cut which they shouldnt have been if the government were right, they were cut at an angle which is how they are cut during demoltions and molten iron was on them which is made by thermite.

  • And then the lack of audio evidence to go along with it. Tsk tsk tsk. He needs to do some homework before he makes these comical remarks.

  • @CaptMandrake360 if you really think all us 100 million truthers are insane, you wouldnt spend your life on youtube trying to debunk us

  • @BrickUnit So, the fact that you are being debunked, is proof that the collapses were controlled demolition? LOL!!!

  • The other thing that is hilarious here, is that every time he is asked about how impossible it is for explosives to be planted beforehand, how he doesn't have a real answer and simply says: "there were elevator renovations going on in the time period leading up to the attacks", which doesn't mean that Al-Qaeda couldn't have penetrated the vulnerable buildings and planted explosives. The other thing, is that it would have taken individual explosives, literally weighing tons to accomplish this.

  • "Internationally respected architect"? LOL!!! Since when would an office fire cause the building to collapse to the side? There is no scientific basis for this bare assertion. Add to that, that he is actually admitting that fires CAN in fact affect a structure. This building didin't collapse until hours later.

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap Go watch ABC NEWS shoot the tower collapse from across the street. We hear absolutely NOTHING in the way of detonations. Nor was ANY CD debris found (and it is EASY to find in any CD!!) Trained people went thru the debris. Kevin Cosgrove trapped on the 105th floor is recorded for over 10 mins prior to collapse. WE HEAR NOTHING!!! No detonations or explosions. Nor does he react to any. Then the building collapses.

    This is UTTERLY ridiculous for CD and no sound.

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap Yeah i do know a few things about CD. I shot the entire process of one for a TV News station. (Been there.. done that!!!) I think the whole point of B7 is that the fire dept KNEW about it!!! It was no mystery to them. It was evacuated BECAUSE it was expected to collapse. The reason it came down is because a VERY large main support failed. And the Chief was right in front when it went.. No detonations no explosions... NOTHING.  it just dropped. From the CHIEF!!

  • @roquefortfiles "The reason it came down is because a VERY large main support failed." That is a new one. With 58 perimeter columns and 25 core columns, this building was very well supported. There wasn't any such "very large main support", that you assert, but instead the weight of the building was well distributed, to each of these columns.

    If you want an engineering perspective, review the outstanding work of Richard Gage, on this subject.

  • @Lightfoot24 LOL oh and btw!!? That is not my opinion. That comes from a structural engineer. (what does he know??... 14 years specialized education) Yes there was a VERY large main support column. It was engineered that way because of a large generator in the building. The main support had to be cantilevered OVER some things. It failed!! Richard Gage is so fucking miss guided it ridiculous. I could hand this fool his hat in 5 mins at one of his lectures.

  • @Lightfoot24 B7? Hmm. Facts huh? FDNY were fully aware it was going to collapse. Very early in the day after WTC came down they determined the building was drifting. It was evacuated because of this. The metallurgy showed the steel failed from a "Rapid Erosion event" (Not melted, not explosives.. FIRE!!). The chief of the FDNY was standing in front of it when it went. No detonations.. no explosions it simply dropped. And they were ready for it..

    So.. Conspiracy?? how does that work?

  • @Lightfoot24

    Richard Gage isn't a structural engineer and he has absolutely no experience in controlled demolition or high rise steel construction.

    Maybe we should close all the civil and mechanical engineering scools and let the 911 Doufus Movement design all of out structures?

    911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

  • @ctcole77 And what about the 1000+ Structural Engineers that signed the petition?

    They are not Structural Engineers either? Yea Right. What ever you say chief.

  • @ctcole77 .

    What is your engineering qualification ?

    "911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN" ? in what sense is the Truth Movement a "Strawman" argument? Its a Movement asking for "Truth" regarding the events of 9/11/2001 in New York.

    So many "debunkers" have no identifiable engineering skills or qualifications but make sweeping statements regarding the claims of experts.

  • @MMIIXX As a Truther, what are *your* engineering skills or qualifications?

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap LOL. All i am saying is.. Don't be ignorant. The video on NOVA is there for anyone to see. There was no AGENDA when it was shot. And I am sorry, but people like Gene Corley are not going to throw away a 40 year professional career on this... RETARDED FUCKING CONSPIRACY NONSENSE!!. Give me a break. The guy is a PROFESSIONAL!!! not some Dylan Avery Fuckwad!. The core remained standing for some time. The tower collapses along the EXACT area it was impacted. Go WATCH

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap Your another ignorant truther fuck dude!! Go and watch it. And your going to argue with structural engineers with 14 years education over YOU??? And video showing you what happened?? (Ignorance knows no bounds!!!)

    As For B7 interview..

    Now we're still worried about 7. We have guys trying to make their way up into the pile, and they're telling us that 7 is going to fall down -

    I have a whole interview FULL of quotes like this.

    Don't be another ignorant nut!!

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap It was given to an industry fire fighting magazine. They spoke at length with the Chief and MANY of the grunts dealing with the building. Very early on in the day the decision was made to abandon it because it was too badly damaged from WTC debris. They did not want to lose anymore guys. That is where the... "Pull it" term comes from... To PULL THE GUYS OUT!! (the chief mentions this!!)

    Let me just say all of this B7 stuff on Youtube.. Its all complete CRAP!!

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap You do!!! Go and watch NOVA'S how the towers collapsed. When the top portion of the building lets go the core columns remain standing (go check it out!!). And the building does not fail at the core. It fails at the outer wall. A line of flooring is yanking on the outer wall and buckling it inward (almost a foot). It fails all at once and you can see this in videos. Once the flooring is gone the outer wall crumples like cardboard.

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap BULLLLLLLLLSHIT!!! The FDNY Chief was NEVER threatened!! I saw an interview with him just recently. He thinks all of this conspiracy stuff is a bunch of nonsense (I tend to agree with him). I have a FULL interview with him and many members of the FDNY. They were WELL AWARE B7 was going to collapse. ABC NEWS (one of among MANY!!!!) shoots the tower in total silence prior to its collapse. So which is it dude? you can't have it both ways.

    I don't smoke the shit!!

  • It seems witch ctccole77 is trying to ruffle feathers. Forget it, witch, you had more evil people than yourself try and FAIL.

  • "who benefited from 9/11?"

    GOOD QUESTION

    Let's see.............what did the USA get out of "committing 911"?

    1) A bad economy.

    2) A democratic Iraq that has economic control over its own oil.

    3) A never ending war in Afghanistan.

    4) A plethora of scientifically moronic 911 twoofers.

    I say the US got ripped off!

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • @ctcole77 Go to google video and watch film 'THE EMPIRE OF "THE CITY' also google

    Before 9/11 guess what 2 countries DID NOT have a Rothschild owned and started Central Bank; Afghanistan and Iraq.

    World Trade Center is an act by Israel with the complicity of Britain and America, under the orders of the Rothschild. Why? simple now Afghanistan and Iraq have Rothschild central banks after the United States invaded!, also they wanted the Patriot Act so they can control the people easier!

  • 11 master satanists, occultists, masons, kabbalists & witches were in his/her assigned spots by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London (paid by neocons) on 911 01: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Ann (GWB's witch aunt) Cappelletti, Bill Gates, Giuliani, Con di Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros & Saddam Hussein (not dead hidden) for the MEGA ritual. John/Mike (GWBs witch cousin) Cappelletti's demolition company gutted & planted explosives in WTC for Silverstein to collect $7 billion insurance.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?

    Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?

    How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

  • @ctcole77 Another witch paid poster, Aleister Crowley follower. Witches greet each other with 93. 93=gematria (mason's G), numerical value for word will (thelema), Law & love-Crowley's saying 'do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, love is the law love under will. 77=Crowley identified OZ by the word “strength,” which equates Qabalistically to a double-seven, or 77. Book 77 in Crowley’s canon is known as Book OZ, or The Thelemic Rights of Man. Eat shit at your next sabbat, witchboy

  • NWO: "It appears 074August has exposed super secret agent ctcole77."

    CTCOLE77: "Affirmative sir. How do we proceed?"

    NWO: "Terminate 074August 's command."

    CTCOLE77: "Terminate sir?"

    NWO: "Terminate.............with extreme prejudice."

    NWO: "Weekly $911 checks to be suspended until termination conformation."

    CTCOLE77: "Roger, ctcole77 out."

    CTCOLE77: “Red team, go!”

  • @ctcole77 Witches Ann, Joyce and John Cappelletti have been trying for 35 years to kill me. I am still here, witch.

    Crawl back into your hole and put the rock over you.

  • 1000 architects testimony is fine however A ten year old can see it was a professional demolition that turned the buildings into powder

  • @joein1972 explain how the twin towers collapsed at the exact points of impact on both buildings , surely that puts pay to any controlled demolition talk .

  • This is all so obvious dosen't take a rocket scientist or architect to figure out something is rotten in New York. Why is it taking so long to get the attention and audience needed to do something about this? I heard 1/2 of population of NY believe there was a conspiracy behind 911 that has not been disclosed yet. Why? Isn't it time for the truth to be revealed after 10 years of lies and mis-representations?

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap

    he is obviously lying as the ask for license numbers of architects and verify it.

    i signed it as an individual not claiming to be an architect as have many others. Either way the facts and physical speak for themselves. look at richard gage a respected architect staking his name on it for what. so dumbass fools like computergeek can think he is a wacko ??? he is doing it for the same reason everyone else is....

    THE TRUTH NEEDS TO COME OUT

  • 9/11 was a ZIONIST job

  • @TylerDurdenMakesSoap yes I lied, to reveal the uselessness of the petition. It's whole purpose is to create the argument from authority logical fallacy. There are even dead people on there. None of the petitioners do any research. If any structural engineer had some studies, he would publish. It's the hugest joke, and it's on you, the whacko conspiracy theorist, who are mostly harmless as they smoke bong hits and don't have to pay rent at moms house.

  • @1computergeek AE911Truth are transparent as to their members. They can be seen on the AE911Truth website. Just click the 'sign the position' and the names are listed with education and license numbers.

    Have you seen this? This is factual information only. Then maybe post some comments form a slightly educated point of view.

    /watch?v=BXw3jJ3021o

  • @matPolaschek I know, I am a member of AE911Truth and lied to become one. It's a pointless organization. Also, I don't watch random videos. Can you explain what it is first? @172km, I bet I could become a member of Pilots too. Again, a pointless organization created to try and use the argument from authority logical fallacy.

  • @1computergeek

    your obviously not a physics geek

  • It is great to see a main stream news station running a segment on this, thanks TVNZ. All this movement needs is more exposure by the media. Without even looking at the inevitability of who's responsible, how come it is so difficult for the media to present these scientific facts? You have over 1400 architects and engineers, as well as chemists, controlled demolition experts all supplying evidence that the buildings could only be brought down by controlled demolition, not by fire.

  • the elevator re-do was when they loaded the explosives, and Marvin Bush was in charge of the security. Yes Bush, Marvin, he was in charge of the security, is that strange? yes. This was a plan, they have to pat themselves on the back, yet anyone wanting the truth is trouble, that is why the evidence is not being talked about. The entire structure was shipped out of America and destoyed, that is destuction of a crime scene,3000 were murdered, this was mass killing. Truth, can you handle it?

  • @powerhouston Did the company who did the elevator upgrade work do the elevator upgrade work? They would have to be a reputable competent company to get the contract to do the work. They would put a bid for the work and go through an extensive negotiation with the Port Authority, with ever clause of the contract being scrutinised. Richard Gage seems to think that people just turn up with hardhats and overalls and do an elevator upgrade. The fact that these people were there doing this >>

  • @cwlldoran work actually points away from the idea of anyone being able to plant explosives in the building- unless Mr. Gage is saying that the workers from this company were planting explosives while they were upgrading the lift system. The steel from the building was examined by numerous experts during the investigation. There was an aircraft hanger full of pieces of steel from the WTC towers in JFK for years after 911 and a judge had to sign off on thier release.

  • @cwlldoran You are trying to make a redundant argument. Evidence has been supplied by the 1,412 verified architectural and engineering professionals of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth of controlled demolition. The science does not lie. This evidence warrants a truly independent investigation in which then they can then deal with how the explosives got into the building. Why select this one component to argue as it is not one of AE911Truth arguments, merely a possibility.

  • @matPolaschek Mr. Gage was asked how the explosives could be placed in a busy office building and he suggested that an elevator upgrade -by a particular named company - was how it could be done, with the collusion of the people on security in the building. I'm suggesting that is a highly implausible (as are most of his arguments). Am I not allowed to make that argument? How is my argument 'redundant' but his is ok - because he's Richard Gage?

  • @cwlldoran Your argument is redundant because you are not trying to disprove Richard Gage's scientific evidence of a controlled demolition. Instead, you are trying to deflect to more speculative subjects, how & why. An investigation would uncover how, and who had access to the building. Maybe start with Marvin Bush of Securacom. What you can't argue is the abundance of scientific fact that supports controlled demolition, i think that deserves an independent investigation.

  • Comment removed

  • @matPolaschek Mr. Gage was refering to the speculative subject of how explosives could be planted in the building, which is not at all speculation on his part since it is the consequence of his idea that controlled demolition brought down the building- it is an inescapable part of his conclusion. The question Mr. Gage needs to be asked is if the WTC towers had not collapsed on 911 and he was asked to sign off on the safety of the buildings would he have gone in to the buildings, done a full>>

  • @cwlldoran >>structural survey, gone up the floors where two large passenger planes had crashed at high speed into them and assessed the damage caused by the impacts and by the subsequent fires -or would he have just said the buildings are safe ,I don't even need to go in a look at them. Because that is the situation he is in now- he didn't go in and make a detailed inspection of the damage and the likely consequences of it, but he is saying they were safe, they couldn't collapse.

  • @cwlldoran You still do not understand. Do you think that the scientific evidence produced by over 1400 architect and engineering experts does not warrant a new investigation?

  • @matPolaschek An investigation is a process of assessing evidence. If Richard Gage and others say the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition then they are reaching that conclusion without the investigation they are asking for. They are also reaching that conclusion without the data they would need to come to that conclusion, i.e an examination of the buildings before they collapsed, data they would insist on getting if they were asked to sign off on the buildings being safe.

  • truth is here. 9-11 was a gulf of Tonkin.

  • Respected? He is an idiot!!

    Taken from an interview with the FDNY Chief.

    but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

  • @roquefortfiles you supply no argument. There is nothing here that disputes the scientific evidence for controlled demolition. Instead you write a quote. Yep, that quote disproves the research of 1,412 Professional Architects and Engineers

  • Just because something looks a certain way from one angle, and ignoring information (the fires engulfing the building all day), doesn't mean it is. The sun looks like it orbits the earth, doesn't mean it does. Structural experts explained how this happened years ago.

    WTC1 and 2 were the opposite of Controlled Demo, burning building chunks flying everywhere.

    The conspiracy theory angle makes one look deserving of a straitjacket. How do you true believers still cling on to this nonsense? lol

  • @chillcrazyman And what about WTC7? You'll just eject that information because you must think it does look like CD. Another person that thinks he know more than the increasing number of 1400+ professional architects and engineers of AE911Thruth. You people are so smart, can you give us your education level please? You must all be structural engineers, architects and controlled demolition experts. They are, you just need to listen on this one, the evidence is clear.

  • @matPolaschek I am one of the 1400 "engineers and architects" who signed the petition. I am not really an engineer. The petition is meaningless when anyone can join by making shit up and answering a phone call.

    Engineers and experts have already explained WTC7 collapsing from fire. Theres a lot of info around. But as I know conspiracy theorists will throw out info that doesn't agree with their wacko beliefs. The truth movement has achieved nothing. Just let it die.

  • @1computergeek a: why did you sign the petition then? b: anyone can sign the petition, I have, and I have not been added to the tally of architects and engineers. Furthermore, NIST states their own model only has a 'low probability' of occurring. Furthermore, it is fact they have ejected very significant information, such as people hearing explosions, molten metal out of the sides of the buildings and at the bases, flashes occurring before the collapse. You have not researched this much at all.

  • My only question is...why did building 7 come down at all? it wasn't hit by a plane was it? and the other buidling were to far away so none of its rubble landed on the top of building 7 so why? what happen?

  • why does a building with internal fires and no controlled detonation devices have fall side ways? huh? i have my hands up palms facing each other 10cm apart... this is my building... there is a fire in between my hands... now my hands suddenly tilt left!! huh? what the? no... they dont... they folded inwardly down from the tips of the fingers... there

  • @172km and you think that your know more than 1,411 Professional architects and engineers? You think your finger experiment would counter an argument put forward by that many professionals with scientific evidence not just to disprove fire, but point out in fact only controlled demolition could bring a building down in that way? Did you use a control in your experiment also?

  • @matPolaschek "and you think that your know more than 1,411 Professional architects and engineers?" oh so you tell me who i am? ok.... "You think your finger experiment would counter an argument put forward by that many professionals..." you got the point of the description right? ( fyi it wasnt an experiment...i didnt have fire between my arms) ... ok then... how does a building fall in a non controlled way? ie there is no way a non controlled building fall, will look like that?thats the point

  • @matPolaschek and you are conveniently choosing to ignore the inconceivability of being able to pull this off... the amount of explosives you would need to bring down those buildings in the perfect way that they came down would be massive...and no one involved has come forth or has had their conscious get the better of them since; elevator companys security companys; also if you r right, these people are evil, why then are they so concerned with making sure the buildings fall perfectly?

  • @172km You should watch this and then see if you can present any argument. David ray Griffin uses documented fact to show the Myth and Reality of the events surrounding 911.

    /watch?v=BXw3jJ3021o

    Then get back to me.

  • @matPolaschek that was great... what happened to the pentagon plane tho? i assume he's happy to hold that it could have been plane 77 that flew into the pentagon? he says he doesnt know what happend on 9/11 (we could make fun of that admission ie he doesnt know what hes talking about... just like he made fun of Bush's admission that Osama wasn't a priority)

  • @172km Have you been to Pilots for 911 Truth? Here's a video on the Pentagon.

    /watch?v=opJUOIaGuXY

  • has anyone got an example of a building falling over in an uncontrolled way? I have never seen one of these conspiracy theorists give one. they always compare wtc7 and the twin towers falling with controlled fall. i assume then, that the people behind this are saying, that an uncontrolled fall *cant* happen like a controlled fall. in fact for them to be consistent they must be saying this. why not have 3 falls on screen at the same time... wtc7, a controlled fall... and an uncontrolled fall ???

  • The twin towers ALSO came down at free fall speeds ! - - - USA ruled by Zionist Jewish Banking Mafia... is there any wonder their society is full of EVIL ?!

  • Excellent Video.

    "Wicked tongues can speak, and rewrite history, but you can't keep the truth contained." -Miles Kennedy

  • Comment removed

  • What are you in second grade? So let me stoop to your parochial discourse for a moment...So does Jamm in Jeff mean you like to take it up the butt? Sounds like a plea to others on Youtube for some anal attention...Not that there's anything wrong with that. Still fantasize about being the butt boy for the Football team? Huh, jeffy (probably what you like to be called while you're getting rear-ended).

  • The whole purpose of some comments here is to change the agenda. The point is that these buildings collapsed under controlled demolition and this video reasons that out. Thanks for posting, don't let the bmen get you down!