"Well.. She's attractive in an obvious way.. Interestingly, a lot of the women who say that about other woman tend to have hidden their own attractions so well, that you do feel like throwing them a bread roll."
"Well.. She's attractive in an obvious way.. Interestingly, a lot of the women who say that about other woman tend to have hidden their own attractions so well, that you do feel like throwing them a bread roll."
first who or what do you think i hate? second "nanny state" ...my point is every day objects are more dangerous then guns when used to kill, so logically (from your stance of gun control) if you are going to have psych exams (gov. regulated) for guns then you should also have gov. regulated psych exams for all sorts of things bought at a store, driven, utilized, etc. thus, "nanny state"
our actions define who we are, our weapons define the perameters our actions can perform. having crap education is the problem, having explosive materials all over the planet (yet to be mined or mixed as well as that which is already prime for exploding) is not going away.
"She's attractive in an obvious way." Interestingly, the women who say that tend to have hidden their attraction SO WELL... LOL.
4:03 I did a very male sort of reckoning, you know. I did the calculation. I thought, "Right. There's three of you, and there's one of me." --I'm rubbish at maths, by the way-- but in record time, I worked out that it would take at least three of me to defend myself against a third of one of them even if he only attacked me with his [arms? arse?]
I hope you're not referring to America as a comparison cos theres a long list of why thats not true.
And the men did put up a resistance, just in the camps, when they already were disarmed. Plus they weren't aware that they were being killed, up until 1942 they just thought they were being relocated and not massacred. Even when they knew, they were half dead anyhow through starvation. Annnnd most escapees were recaptured and killed.
@HarrisonRocks if they were allowed to own guns in the firt place and the german people new that they couldn't take the jews guns without betraying their nation and their life... how do you think it would have panned out? you seem to know so much.(unlike the average american, especially the ones who think gun rights are for hunters)
@Idolcruisefix the negatives outweigh the positives in gun licenses. of course it will affect those in power, because everyone has guns. the jews were a minority and the rest of germany was either in awe of Hitler or antisemitic.
@Choo69 If each male adult jew (rounded up in WWII) shot a nazi how would the nazi have fought the war? i would guess very poorly. Ambushing soldiers would have worked to significantly hurt the german ranks. There is reports of people regreting that they didn't fight when they had the better chance to, gun or no gun. this regret seems to also work for my argument, for how can you regret something that would be useless, if changed? and why do "gun-less" cities have more shootings if guns are bad?
@Idolcruisefix Of course they regret it, because they had no fuckin' clue they were being exterminated. They were pussies and so was everyone else in Germany afraid of the Nazi party. They regret it because they know now that so many were about to died that day. Even if you ambushed them, the jews were a minority who were outnumbered, outskilled etc. Poland tried to stand up to the Nazis y'know? But they got annihilated. So the male Jews having a gun each would be nothing significant at all.
@Idolcruisefix as for your other question I have no idea, but it does not mean it's a correlation between gun ownership and and increase in gun shootings. Look at the scandinavian countries. They have managed to keep their crime rates the lowest, no guns.
@Choo69 no guns? there are no guns in scandanavian countries? i think that is an exageration, and i think that a countries methods of reformation have more of an impact on the actions in that society then their access to weapons, which is easy to by-pass if you are a criminal.
@Idolcruisefix you know what I meant when I said no guns.
You're going about it the wrong way though. Weapons, violence, self-defence are not part of the solution. To keep peace and crime low we start with education and higher standard of living, that way crime won't be necessary and drugs would be almost be non-existent. So what are you solving by legalising guns? You are just giving people the green light that it's okay to use violence - when necessary. And that's how we end up starting wars.
@Choo69 saying guns and self defence are not ok is saying you can't defend yourself against uneducated violent people attacking you. Making violent uneducated people less violent and more educated doesn't seem to have anything to do with saying a gun should be outlawed. they seem as opposites. saying you can't have a gun seems like saying you are to stupid to not be uneducated and violent. I feel safer, knowing educated non-violent people can have the same weapons as law breakers & war-mongers.
@Idolcruisefix Seem to have ignored my education point, which would pretty much remove law-breaking, of all sorts. How can you call all uneducated people violent? Usually those who are violent are just frustrated and need an outlet, an education and proper upbringing would be that outlet.
However in terms of feeling safe, yeah I suppose you would. But would you not feel safer if they had a knife instead? It's the same logic.
My solution would be with education, in the long run it's better.
@Choo69 "the uneducated?violent?" didn't say that, i said "uneducated violent people" as in blue sad people or "orange floatable elephans" doesn't mean all elephants or people are always these things. however i do think all violence is started in ignorance, i just don't think it's safe to conclude we don't need guns (bad people would make guns) until we are all taught to unravel lies made for making war, death, etc. but by then, if there is no violent people why would you need to ban guns?
@Idolcruisefix meh, just to be safe and of course there are always bad people BUT most who commit crime are not bad people. they either seek the thrill, or are a victim of circumstances etc.
if there is any form of legalisation i would consider a test of some sort and a background check. that way guns will be given to those who are clean.
I still think the world would be a better place without guns :P
@Choo69 all people who commit violent (w/victims) crime are bad, i spent alot of time with bad people and i have been homeless before with nothing, but i didn't kill anyone because they wouldn't give me their purse/wallet (which i was also NEVER pulling on). you write "i still think the world would be a be a better place without guns," so your argument is also for education & ridding the world of all explosives(sounds fictional)? &only victimless violence for fun makes your actions "not bad."
@Choo69 and how in the hell are you going to disarm any group or even one well armed person, without any guns? make like non-lethal stuff? foam and shit? lets see how foam and rubber bullets sound cannons and microwave guns(which actually might be lethal, in soft kill) face off against a couple full auto high calibur guns. i think you already know the outcome.
@Idolcruisefix Well firstly if we did not have firearms nobody would get shot. Secondly, education would reduce reasons to turn to crime. Thirdly, the police will disarm them, with their own guns.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that people who own guns should have a psychological examination before handling any sort of firearm.
@Choo69 psycho-analysed folks?like in front and only in front of a jury of 12 of their peers? I must say this beter again, a world wihout firearms? (i suppose by removing any memory or affinity for projectile technology from all human minds/brains as well as removal of all combustible materials capable of making a dangerous weapon (which would require a move to only green energy))??? yah, you must mean only some people can be allowed to have guns and your argument becomes nazi crap, not eutopia.
@Choo69 Average folks saw nazi's doing good for quite some time. "it's better to have a gun and not need one, then to need a gun and not have one." god for bid if Austrailians are ethnicly cleansed by any army, even from their own fraction of desperate delusional people who want to kill or bully. Loss of sanity or corruption from others helps weed out the sane from being soldiers or cops, this will change if average folks are police more often. Ask 5 cops a question, see your sane test at work.
@Choo69 you say "what I'm trying to say is that people who own guns should have a psychological examination before handling any sort of firearm." and you saying that is the same thing as saying everyone is guilty untill proven innocent, rather then the other way around.
Never said they were guilty until proven innocent, I was merely making a compromise to having firearms (even thought I think we're much better off without). The compromise between my no-guns ideal and your ideal is a background and psycho-analysis with PROFESSIONALS. Just like how people are tested for their psyche in fields like medicine where lives can be at risk. Why would you think a psyche test would be wrong? I think it's reasonable.
@Choo69 Doctors are required to take a psych test, not in the USA, they might think they are required to, it could just as well be info to see if you will kill and then put you in charge. since it's all confidential in all those wierd answers and questions, then that can be corrupted to let psycho's get raises and more authority at hospitals. You think the government and control mechanisms help us, i think we help us and you want to give power to a few, which is more dangerous.
@Choo69 A difference w/ saying i need a psych test to drive a car or to own a gun and saying i'm guilty of something? you don't need to test if i am sane, rather if i am capable of gun use or motor vehicle use. if i kill someone with a playing card, then you test my sanity to see if i go to the looney bin or the prison. as i said before, these establishments cause high violent victim death, etc, much more then guns and again it's crazy, get rid of all guns. maybe for fun, for a day, someday
@Idolcruisefix I NEVER said anything about guilty until innocent. The test would determine whether you are suitable to be holding an instrument capable of destruction without causing any.
Your view of the world is extremely pessimistic, maybe because of your own personal experiences. The basic of my principles will not be giving power to the few, but to the ones that understand the responsibility of power.
@Choo69 you say i'm pessimistic, i totally see your view as pessimistic.I say you're wrong, you say i'm wrong?! Geez! you say the world would be safer without guns(preludes outlawing sharp sticks) then you say we need guns, but what it seems you miss is, it is always us that need the guns, just in case, or the criminals can make us dead or slaves etc. it's so simple in my mind and i'm sure your visions of solutions, are simple to see for you. lies told to the ignorant makes war, guns don't.
@Choo69 psych tests are for crazy people, not for people that might be crazy, or you have to regulate everything that kills people, not just guns, i know not one person wants to live in a place where everything dangerous is regulated by the state... it's real simple, killers lived before guns, and would live if you futilely tried to rid the planet of them, (which you still seem on the fence about).& i trust you "understand the responsibility of power" because you are innocent so far, not guilty.
@Choo69 w/ this logic, all sorts of people need psych exams for your nanny state to work, cars kill more then guns do. Your "regulation" will only be used to disarm the public because power freaks want that? always have, always will. until we educate them all and/or their kids and/or minions? they are not "the world" that i think is grim as you said (putting words in my mouth) we are the world. The few who try to control us are always grim and out of control, always have been, in every culture.
@Choo69 lots of things kill, like box cutters(no guns) supposedly on 9-11 or gasoline, elements,compounds, automobiles, boats, planes, etc. innocent people (a MAJORITY) w/ the right to have guns is a good way to be safer(just in case) from the FEW, seemingly more dangerous,but if all innocent people are armed and can shoot, then some of them/you/me might survive being attacked by the FEW who are sick in the head and drunk with power. your outlook on humanity and the world seems grim, not mine
@Choo69 see, i trust you are sane enough to protect me as long as you are not a violent offender, it's a little experiment called the USA, come join in the trust and self governance. it's not spooky.
@Idolcruisefix I actually find USA one of the best examples of freedom in the history of mankind.Yet the prospect of gun ownership in Western civilisation just doesn't make sense? It seems like a cowboy western movie except in cities and rural areas. I dunno, it just seems off.
Besides the overwhelming faith in God that country has, and the guns, it's done everything right so far. It's heading in the right direction, at least.
@Choo69 you say on gun ownership, "It seems like a cowboy western movie except in cities and rural areas. I dunno, it just seems off." maybe you think this because of cowboy western movies and gangster movies and rampant propaganda everywhere in western culture and else where. trust me the few people who want to control everything, don't wan't the 2nd amendment to do anything but fail in reality and in the minds of everyone world wide. ...Slaves can't own guns for a reason.
@Idolcruisefix I don't think we're slaves, I think humans are just naturally subservient. They will always look to a leader to lead them.
Anyway, I don't see myself as a slave even if I don't have a gun because the country where I'm from does not condone violence as a sign of power. It's culture more than anything... the US have a perfect history for the rights to owning a gun. In other countries we do not find the need to own a gun to protect ourselves. We inherently have faith in humanity.
@Choo69 you say "owning guns is not needed if you are not condoneing violence as a sign of power." is that right???? it's like we are speaking different languages. i can't imagine thinking of a gun as something that condones violence. you kniw what condones violence? propaganda about violence and economic enslavement, (already happened to every nation). get an education ...and if you had faith in humanity you wouldn't want to give everyone with a dangerous object a psych test. ...history repeats
@Idolcruisefix As I've said before, gun ownership is a green light for people to use a gun - when it's necessary. The purpose of the psych test? To limit the use of guns to those that will not exploit it as a weapon of attack. Your hate is derived from your outlook on humanity which is the difference between you and me. You think the government is power hungry and mad and that everyone in it is out to exploit the weak. While sometimes in history that happens, more often than not...
@Idolcruisefix the leaders are usually people who have the right intentions, even Hitler thought he was doing good. That is why we have the psych test. To figure the possible consequences if a dangerous object is being given to the wrong hands. It is a precaution, hell, if you don't trust the government make it a third party organisation made up of doctors from everywhere.
There is a difference between serfdom and slavery. Serfdom is an economic class of circumstance.
@Idolcruisefix Slavery is ownership of a human being. Which incidentally infringes on civil rights, defining them as a lower class than human. In a sense everyone is a slave to the economy, especially to money.
I know that horrible things have happened in the past to the common people and that there are several who are looking to exploit them. But in this day and age, they can't do that. The freedom of information combined with technology has made this world closer than it has ever been before.
@Choo69 "those who don't know history are bound to repeat it" and history shows that the common people (the majority, which are mostly good people) are constantly robbed and killed due to the lies fed from a few people who also happen to be the people getting most of the plunder. hmmm? how curious
@Idolcruisefix The world is getting smaller, anything about mass human exploitation would be scorned upon. Look at religion, great example. Religion is dying out, mostly the extreme ones like Islam and Scientology. These religions were built by the several who sought to exploit the common people. They were destroyed with the help of mass communication.
So simply saying that having no guns would disempower the many is wrong.
@Choo69 islam grows i think, and depending on how you look at the religious, they have all grown in numbers as multiple people, because of mass communication, see many religions as buckets of water from the same lake, all having something to offer in philosophy or actual unexplained phenomenon, also science doesn't necessarily end religion or escape dogma. Whats w/ the "guns and absence of religion ?or a small world? being scorned? like nazi's were (after they were praised)? didn't stop them.
@Idolcruisefix I was just saying that Hitler thought he was doing the right thing, for his people, which is just another viewpoint of what leaders do.
Mao Zedong starved his people to death but also brought employment rates to a sky high and lifted parts of China out of a third world state. Some people thinks he did great, others not so much. Matter of perspective. I'm not saying what Hitler did was right, but he thought he did.
@Choo69 i like how you wrote "Mao Zedong starved his people to death but also brought employment rates to a sky high" ....that is comedy, maybe if we murder 30% of our population, i could get a job, ha ha
@Idolcruisefix ;) yeah it's funny that some people stand by his decisions, I liked his idea - to bring China out of a third world state, but his means of doing so were extreme. But who could know what would've happened if he didn't? I mean, people were already so poor. That begs the question whether the means justify the ends.
Like the atom bombs America laid on Japan. It ended world war, but at what cost?
@Choo69 Machiavelli principals are shit. also food,free cleen water and electricity is not what these people do,(they kill folks who try to make this stuff out of turn), ever, because the good people have no desire to ever be those people, so they don't have the power to destroy or create whole nations. unless they unite and wake the fuck up and start telling it how it is so the minions of the asshole control freaks stop doing what they are doing and we get the world back from the royal bitches.
@Idolcruisefix the world isn't divided into good and bad people, you have to remember that. most of the time the 'evil' side will never be united, that is why the good always triumph because they are united against an enemy whereas evil are full of people willing to exploit, corrupt for power.
not all people in power are evil either, royalty sometimes have their good and bad. which is the very weakness of a monarchy, it stays within the family.
@Choo69 if people in power appear good or are good it still seems to be the bad ones that always steer empires into despotism and terrible dictatorships or monarchies, or the like, that suppress people/resources and also cause genocide in more dirrect ways, ie. human sacrifice, torture ordained by "god" or "logic", detainment/exicution without trial, etc. "we the people" governing ourselves, is a new idea that can defeat this cycle of tyrrany, but it needs us to work.
@Choo69 you say that the evil side will always be divided, but how much crap will they spew trying to take over the world? how much will we let them spew, we have to wake the world up and take it back, staying non-violent for as long as posible, yet spewing truth and thought provoking stuff as much as possible before we are fighting their most loyal brainwashed minions and/or drones in online worlds of fiction made real. yes just like in the old movie, forget the name."master and commander?"
@Choo69 how can we be under control? bailouts of trillions of dollars, alot of which was supposed to go to the failing housing market then just set off to unknown parties, that sounds legal, how about the patriot act?!!!! or the disarming of americans in disasters (even economic?)the economic enlavement of over 100 countries from euro trash royalty? business as usuall? nothing to be alarmed about? you should watch "confessions of an economic hitman," or "freedom to fascism"
@Idolcruisefix Don't see how European monarchies are enslaving their people. They get to live a lavish lifestyle in return for being in charge of the running of government. Well, the UK is an exception because the monarch over there practically has no power.
By the way, the mess that America has gotten itself into is pretty funny, the rest of the world is laughing at the once great nation it was.
Anyway, people don't give a rat's ass whether they are under control, as long as they have money.
@Idolcruisefix Sorry, as long as they have food, water and shelter. Nobody gives a fuck about freedom. We are fighting wars in the middle east for freedom? Fuck no, we are fighting because we hate muslims and their dirty ass way of living. This thing about people being different has turned us into monsters. Everyone hates each other because they're different. If they're happy and not interrupting our lives why the hell should we give a crap? They like monarchy, fine, as long as there's no pain.
@Choo69 so, ok, your not talking about money, exactly, you are talking about pacification with decent living standards, food and entertainment. These 3 are an old tactic w/ the roman empire. and are always rationed and taken away to get people riled up, pissed off & make them want the 3 things, if we can make this shit ourselves, problem solved also, you say"Everyone hates eachother" i don't think so most strangers who look different than me are not assholes.
@Idolcruisefix I know, but it's a general statement. We are no longer in the medieval era and yet we still find the weird or strange unacceptable and they must die or conform in order to belong in society.
All the world needs is for the basics, food, water, shelter, education and health care. The rest is luxury. If people could understand that we would not have wars. Of course, you're gonna say the government can manipulate such conditions to their advantage, but if they too realised it...
@Choo69 we the people, being informed in the usa would make they (the masters, or us) "realise it" because they would be us, the empowered, which we still are, We have to inform the sleepy heads first before any violence starts among the idiots.
@Idolcruisefix The problem is, violence has already started and nobody has woken up. The US war on terror is going worse than expected, they're just not telling anyone. This war is useless. But once we pull out the terrorists will count it as a victory and no American is going to accept that... none.
While we fight there are third world countries suffering from famine, disease. The money we spend making bombs etc would be put to better use saving the innocent. I hope people soon wake up.
@Choo69 and i still don't think anyone but maybe 5% of the population, all idiots, think wierdos should die or conform. maybe you haven't gotten out and socialized much, but there are alot of nice people all over the place, from what i see. sure there are assholes that come out of the woodwork to rob you, the good folks mind their own business, but you are right there are problems, just not so bad as you think, there is also realization of the problems and a reversal of these type intentions
@Idolcruisefix The small world, the Earth has become a small village because of communications. With the exceptions of countries who are employing censorship of media, everyone is included in this village. Like a village, everyone knows what each other is doing and that's where this "rampant propaganda" of yours comes in. Movies, television, the paper is providing us with the moral and social standards, whether this is propaganda or not is another issue. These standards are applied to everyone.
@Idolcruisefix Everyone will be "scorned" if any such country would step out of line too far. This is what we are heading towards, we are only currently moving towards internationalist ideas.
Religion is the one being scorned, if it does step out of line. Islam and Scientology are the examples. All because of this village.
This shows the power of words over guns, solving conflicts without the need for firearms. It is what I've been saying about a "gun-less" world.
@Choo69 religion might just be highjacked by "several who sought to exploit the common people." not neccessarily built for it, except scientology (recent history). Prime example of dogma in science the fixed eliptical orbit of the earth around the sun, is not fixed, but is still taught everywhere almost a hundred years later to push this idea we live in a fixed universe so anything wierd happening must be us. same thing religion was used for by the few., anything that went wrong was our fault.
@Choo69 and what do you mean by this? what do i hate? you said "your perception is distorted by hate" what do you think i am sounding hateful towards?
@Idolcruisefix I mean that, and I'm assuming here, that some of your own personal experiences has led to a biased view on life. It is pessimistic, I know I've seen cases where people can be overtly manipulative, psychotic. But that's just the few and it's rare. The good in people can astonish you sometimes, it's just a matter of finding those people. Geographically, the bad tend to band together because of them being outcasts to the majority of good people in society.
@Choo69 and it IS "scorned apon." Slavery is still very real in all forms, including children for sex, war IS "human exploitation," Economic enslavement is controled famine and genocide. and it is all frowned apon, just not enough. mo bettah, with big loud formidable "frowns"(mass peacefull protest from gun owners)
@Idolcruisefix Actually we are all slaves to money, we cannot live without it. In turn we are slaves to the economy, the seemingly self-sufficiency of it. If the economy fails then we will see mass famine. Genocide? Probably. It's what Hitler did after the Great Depression.
These issues... you can see that the world isn't perfect but the world is working towards solving these problems. Even if it does seem governments do nothing, people's voices are speaking and they will damn sure hear it.
@Choo69 if you think it is an accident that we ALREADY HAVE MASS FAMINE (which you seem to not realize), i don't know where to start. I'll try, we p get photographs on the moon & mars and change genes that assimilate plants and copywrite them, AND COLLIDE PARTICALS but we can"t make rivers of fresh water from the ocean or air and pour them in deserts where, also all or most or a third or 1% of the worlds urban organic waste awaits, all growing food w/ no electricity, that's just too complicated
@Idolcruisefix I don't think it's an accident, nor do I think it is on purpose caused by the few. If there is mass famine there is two things wrong in the country:
1. The economy
2. Corruption in government
While 1 and 2 can both be cause and effects of each other it basically boils down to one of the two.
Also, while advancements in science have been extraordinary, it is disappointing to see we can't solve the natural resources issue. There is also the businessmen who don't want it to be solved
@Choo69 watch "confessions of an economic hitman" or "freedom to fascism" or check out monsanto's new products or read "the peoples history of theUS" .... i'm pretty sure, it's on purpose.
if everyone had guns we would not have snipers, because they would be killed quickly by the sane public, not to mention trading off any hitlers or emperialism out of control. the usa can get their country back by any means neccassary.
Or wipe themselves out by cack-handed rednecks, drug-dealing street gangs and angry school kids mowing down their classmates. In the meantime justifying the legality of an item which is entirely designed to kill stuff on hypothetical scenarios of communist invaders and civil anarchy. Thank god the usa has guns eh?
@HarrisonRocks high school shootings and gang violence and drunk hicks shooting people is not so bad when compared to the alternative. Criminals will make guns if they have to. and before guns it's not like swords ever did any damage, right? what every german jew in WWII had an AK-47? maybe they wouldn't have been slaughtered like animals, that's not hypothetical, that's what governments eventually do, if you let them.
What?! So "hypothetically" if the NRA dropped pistols and instruction manuals over eastern europe then that well-organised, well equipped German blitzreig that smashed through France and Britains combined miltary wouldn't have stood a chance now that the jewish women and children could get in on the action? Thats downright right fucking stuuuuupid sir.
And off the record, in the UK guns are illegal (alot of farmers have seem to them though :s) and we're "communist free" thanks.
@HarrisonRocks i'm saying that the nazi party, or anything like the nazi party and the war would have been cut down before it got too big IF there was always a well informed well armed public, everywhere, but there was not, so the world may never, know, but i know i'd want a gunfight before i'd want to walk into a ditch i just dug with another 10,000 people.
@HarrisonRocks men also didn't have guns, not just "women and children" as you say. They were not allowed to own guns, why do you say women and children couldn't own guns?, no jew could own guns, sex had nothing to do with it.
Also killing a nazi meant everybody paid the price, theres an entire viillage in France that was wiped out (700 people I think) because of 1 dead nazi and it was the wrong village anyway!
@HarrisonRocks if being a good servant to any possible psychos in your path(including the ones ordering armies around) is your plan to survive, then you are lost. i would much rather not risk genocide in my own way, by assuring the psycho/s have a short climb to world domination, one ending in death, or imprisonment, not a bunch of blind service and help from god? is this where we are going with this?.
hahahahaha the very end is genius
kazamakooza 2 weeks ago
It's not insanity. He's just diffrently sane.
nicktheclicker 1 month ago
Insanity at its best XD
esa414 2 months ago
to cheer you upxx
rosmeadow123 5 months ago
"what if I crash into a lake?" hahaha
Gleeba77 6 months ago
Well, she was attractive in an obvious way
LightboxArts 6 months ago 5
Way he describes the black guy "wonderful chizlled features" HA HA
Nanotech92 8 months ago
"the best I could hope for would be to drown someone in my own blood" XD LOL
GBfanatic15 8 months ago 11
how witty was that story?!?
tobo86 9 months ago
one person is a skin head.
SaKe875 9 months ago 2
what did he say about californian wine..cleanse up a..?
NightinGal89 10 months ago
@NightinGal89 which you can use to clean submarines
ashdabest67 9 months ago
Does he EVER say how the incident with the skinheads ended? I meam I'm pretty sure he made the story up, but still....
zlozlozlo 10 months ago
1 Person is watching this from a clock tower holding a rifle... :)
metalscreamfool 10 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
"Well.. She's attractive in an obvious way.. Interestingly, a lot of the women who say that about other woman tend to have hidden their own attractions so well, that you do feel like throwing them a bread roll."
spazzishazzi 1 year ago
"Well.. She's attractive in an obvious way.. Interestingly, a lot of the women who say that about other woman tend to have hidden their own attractions so well, that you do feel like throwing them a bread roll."
spazzishazzi 1 year ago 10
my old maths teacher is a hunch back aha.
Clarky3493 1 year ago
1 person did went mental
tommyPT23 1 year ago
so what exactly did the skinheads do? nice upload
derp
IAINoodle 1 year ago
@assym2006 The sheer irony of this being posted on this video is hilarious. Either you're an incredibly intelligent comedian or a prejudice moron
Snowbilby 1 year ago
Hang on. 3 skinheads. Doesn't he try to get beaten up by 3 skinheads in the first episode of Black Books so he's too injured to do his tax?
Electroguy1996 1 year ago 17
@assym2006 That's fucked - what kind of dog would bite the hand that fed them?
Choo69 1 year ago
Sheer genius.
MrRyanF 1 year ago
This is a ramble of a mad man, fucking love it.
IntoxicatingHuman 1 year ago 72
im not a fighter im a bleeder
crowdsurfers 1 year ago 80
@crowdsurfers wasn't that a woody allen line, though?
MrBradipo73 1 week ago
first who or what do you think i hate? second "nanny state" ...my point is every day objects are more dangerous then guns when used to kill, so logically (from your stance of gun control) if you are going to have psych exams (gov. regulated) for guns then you should also have gov. regulated psych exams for all sorts of things bought at a store, driven, utilized, etc. thus, "nanny state"
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
our actions define who we are, our weapons define the perameters our actions can perform. having crap education is the problem, having explosive materials all over the planet (yet to be mined or mixed as well as that which is already prime for exploding) is not going away.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
lol
Daviusheart 1 year ago
"She's attractive in an obvious way." Interestingly, the women who say that tend to have hidden their attraction SO WELL... LOL.
4:03 I did a very male sort of reckoning, you know. I did the calculation. I thought, "Right. There's three of you, and there's one of me." --I'm rubbish at maths, by the way-- but in record time, I worked out that it would take at least three of me to defend myself against a third of one of them even if he only attacked me with his [arms? arse?]
I love this guy!
lijluvr356 1 year ago 3
@lijluvr356 it was arse. ^^
tealwolfhowl 1 year ago
@lijluvr356
With his arse :)
By the way, what's the end of the 'hidden their attraction' sentence - 'throwing them ......' ??
GODSAWAYONBUSINESS 1 year ago
a bread roll
wobbygongman 1 year ago
'Well-armed well-INFORMED public'?
I hope you're not referring to America as a comparison cos theres a long list of why thats not true.
And the men did put up a resistance, just in the camps, when they already were disarmed. Plus they weren't aware that they were being killed, up until 1942 they just thought they were being relocated and not massacred. Even when they knew, they were half dead anyhow through starvation. Annnnd most escapees were recaptured and killed.
HarrisonRocks 1 year ago
@HarrisonRocks if they were allowed to own guns in the firt place and the german people new that they couldn't take the jews guns without betraying their nation and their life... how do you think it would have panned out? you seem to know so much.(unlike the average american, especially the ones who think gun rights are for hunters)
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Hitler was a maniac anyways. He was gonna do it no matter what.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 yah, I guess the right to own guns has no effect on maniacs in power... I'm being sarcastic.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix the negatives outweigh the positives in gun licenses. of course it will affect those in power, because everyone has guns. the jews were a minority and the rest of germany was either in awe of Hitler or antisemitic.
guns would not have stopped hitler.
guns do not stop wars.
guns do not bring safety.
i'm not being sarcastic.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 If each male adult jew (rounded up in WWII) shot a nazi how would the nazi have fought the war? i would guess very poorly. Ambushing soldiers would have worked to significantly hurt the german ranks. There is reports of people regreting that they didn't fight when they had the better chance to, gun or no gun. this regret seems to also work for my argument, for how can you regret something that would be useless, if changed? and why do "gun-less" cities have more shootings if guns are bad?
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Of course they regret it, because they had no fuckin' clue they were being exterminated. They were pussies and so was everyone else in Germany afraid of the Nazi party. They regret it because they know now that so many were about to died that day. Even if you ambushed them, the jews were a minority who were outnumbered, outskilled etc. Poland tried to stand up to the Nazis y'know? But they got annihilated. So the male Jews having a gun each would be nothing significant at all.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix as for your other question I have no idea, but it does not mean it's a correlation between gun ownership and and increase in gun shootings. Look at the scandinavian countries. They have managed to keep their crime rates the lowest, no guns.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 no guns? there are no guns in scandanavian countries? i think that is an exageration, and i think that a countries methods of reformation have more of an impact on the actions in that society then their access to weapons, which is easy to by-pass if you are a criminal.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix you know what I meant when I said no guns.
You're going about it the wrong way though. Weapons, violence, self-defence are not part of the solution. To keep peace and crime low we start with education and higher standard of living, that way crime won't be necessary and drugs would be almost be non-existent. So what are you solving by legalising guns? You are just giving people the green light that it's okay to use violence - when necessary. And that's how we end up starting wars.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 saying guns and self defence are not ok is saying you can't defend yourself against uneducated violent people attacking you. Making violent uneducated people less violent and more educated doesn't seem to have anything to do with saying a gun should be outlawed. they seem as opposites. saying you can't have a gun seems like saying you are to stupid to not be uneducated and violent. I feel safer, knowing educated non-violent people can have the same weapons as law breakers & war-mongers.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Seem to have ignored my education point, which would pretty much remove law-breaking, of all sorts. How can you call all uneducated people violent? Usually those who are violent are just frustrated and need an outlet, an education and proper upbringing would be that outlet.
However in terms of feeling safe, yeah I suppose you would. But would you not feel safer if they had a knife instead? It's the same logic.
My solution would be with education, in the long run it's better.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 "the uneducated?violent?" didn't say that, i said "uneducated violent people" as in blue sad people or "orange floatable elephans" doesn't mean all elephants or people are always these things. however i do think all violence is started in ignorance, i just don't think it's safe to conclude we don't need guns (bad people would make guns) until we are all taught to unravel lies made for making war, death, etc. but by then, if there is no violent people why would you need to ban guns?
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix meh, just to be safe and of course there are always bad people BUT most who commit crime are not bad people. they either seek the thrill, or are a victim of circumstances etc.
if there is any form of legalisation i would consider a test of some sort and a background check. that way guns will be given to those who are clean.
I still think the world would be a better place without guns :P
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 all people who commit violent (w/victims) crime are bad, i spent alot of time with bad people and i have been homeless before with nothing, but i didn't kill anyone because they wouldn't give me their purse/wallet (which i was also NEVER pulling on). you write "i still think the world would be a be a better place without guns," so your argument is also for education & ridding the world of all explosives(sounds fictional)? &only victimless violence for fun makes your actions "not bad."
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 and how in the hell are you going to disarm any group or even one well armed person, without any guns? make like non-lethal stuff? foam and shit? lets see how foam and rubber bullets sound cannons and microwave guns(which actually might be lethal, in soft kill) face off against a couple full auto high calibur guns. i think you already know the outcome.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Well firstly if we did not have firearms nobody would get shot. Secondly, education would reduce reasons to turn to crime. Thirdly, the police will disarm them, with their own guns.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that people who own guns should have a psychological examination before handling any sort of firearm.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 psycho-analysed folks?like in front and only in front of a jury of 12 of their peers? I must say this beter again, a world wihout firearms? (i suppose by removing any memory or affinity for projectile technology from all human minds/brains as well as removal of all combustible materials capable of making a dangerous weapon (which would require a move to only green energy))??? yah, you must mean only some people can be allowed to have guns and your argument becomes nazi crap, not eutopia.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I don't see countries like Australia being Nazis. They're fine.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 Average folks saw nazi's doing good for quite some time. "it's better to have a gun and not need one, then to need a gun and not have one." god for bid if Austrailians are ethnicly cleansed by any army, even from their own fraction of desperate delusional people who want to kill or bully. Loss of sanity or corruption from others helps weed out the sane from being soldiers or cops, this will change if average folks are police more often. Ask 5 cops a question, see your sane test at work.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 you say "what I'm trying to say is that people who own guns should have a psychological examination before handling any sort of firearm." and you saying that is the same thing as saying everyone is guilty untill proven innocent, rather then the other way around.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Stop putting words into my mouth?
Never said they were guilty until proven innocent, I was merely making a compromise to having firearms (even thought I think we're much better off without). The compromise between my no-guns ideal and your ideal is a background and psycho-analysis with PROFESSIONALS. Just like how people are tested for their psyche in fields like medicine where lives can be at risk. Why would you think a psyche test would be wrong? I think it's reasonable.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 Doctors are required to take a psych test, not in the USA, they might think they are required to, it could just as well be info to see if you will kill and then put you in charge. since it's all confidential in all those wierd answers and questions, then that can be corrupted to let psycho's get raises and more authority at hospitals. You think the government and control mechanisms help us, i think we help us and you want to give power to a few, which is more dangerous.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 A difference w/ saying i need a psych test to drive a car or to own a gun and saying i'm guilty of something? you don't need to test if i am sane, rather if i am capable of gun use or motor vehicle use. if i kill someone with a playing card, then you test my sanity to see if i go to the looney bin or the prison. as i said before, these establishments cause high violent victim death, etc, much more then guns and again it's crazy, get rid of all guns. maybe for fun, for a day, someday
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I NEVER said anything about guilty until innocent. The test would determine whether you are suitable to be holding an instrument capable of destruction without causing any.
Your view of the world is extremely pessimistic, maybe because of your own personal experiences. The basic of my principles will not be giving power to the few, but to the ones that understand the responsibility of power.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 you say i'm pessimistic, i totally see your view as pessimistic.I say you're wrong, you say i'm wrong?! Geez! you say the world would be safer without guns(preludes outlawing sharp sticks) then you say we need guns, but what it seems you miss is, it is always us that need the guns, just in case, or the criminals can make us dead or slaves etc. it's so simple in my mind and i'm sure your visions of solutions, are simple to see for you. lies told to the ignorant makes war, guns don't.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 psych tests are for crazy people, not for people that might be crazy, or you have to regulate everything that kills people, not just guns, i know not one person wants to live in a place where everything dangerous is regulated by the state... it's real simple, killers lived before guns, and would live if you futilely tried to rid the planet of them, (which you still seem on the fence about).& i trust you "understand the responsibility of power" because you are innocent so far, not guilty.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 w/ this logic, all sorts of people need psych exams for your nanny state to work, cars kill more then guns do. Your "regulation" will only be used to disarm the public because power freaks want that? always have, always will. until we educate them all and/or their kids and/or minions? they are not "the world" that i think is grim as you said (putting words in my mouth) we are the world. The few who try to control us are always grim and out of control, always have been, in every culture.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix OMFG NO.
WHY THE NANNY STATE WHYYYYYYYYYY
This is for guns, only guns. ok? :) you are delusional, your perception is poisoned by hate.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 lots of things kill, like box cutters(no guns) supposedly on 9-11 or gasoline, elements,compounds, automobiles, boats, planes, etc. innocent people (a MAJORITY) w/ the right to have guns is a good way to be safer(just in case) from the FEW, seemingly more dangerous,but if all innocent people are armed and can shoot, then some of them/you/me might survive being attacked by the FEW who are sick in the head and drunk with power. your outlook on humanity and the world seems grim, not mine
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 see, i trust you are sane enough to protect me as long as you are not a violent offender, it's a little experiment called the USA, come join in the trust and self governance. it's not spooky.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I actually find USA one of the best examples of freedom in the history of mankind.Yet the prospect of gun ownership in Western civilisation just doesn't make sense? It seems like a cowboy western movie except in cities and rural areas. I dunno, it just seems off.
Besides the overwhelming faith in God that country has, and the guns, it's done everything right so far. It's heading in the right direction, at least.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 you say on gun ownership, "It seems like a cowboy western movie except in cities and rural areas. I dunno, it just seems off." maybe you think this because of cowboy western movies and gangster movies and rampant propaganda everywhere in western culture and else where. trust me the few people who want to control everything, don't wan't the 2nd amendment to do anything but fail in reality and in the minds of everyone world wide. ...Slaves can't own guns for a reason.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I don't think we're slaves, I think humans are just naturally subservient. They will always look to a leader to lead them.
Anyway, I don't see myself as a slave even if I don't have a gun because the country where I'm from does not condone violence as a sign of power. It's culture more than anything... the US have a perfect history for the rights to owning a gun. In other countries we do not find the need to own a gun to protect ourselves. We inherently have faith in humanity.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 you say "owning guns is not needed if you are not condoneing violence as a sign of power." is that right???? it's like we are speaking different languages. i can't imagine thinking of a gun as something that condones violence. you kniw what condones violence? propaganda about violence and economic enslavement, (already happened to every nation). get an education ...and if you had faith in humanity you wouldn't want to give everyone with a dangerous object a psych test. ...history repeats
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix As I've said before, gun ownership is a green light for people to use a gun - when it's necessary. The purpose of the psych test? To limit the use of guns to those that will not exploit it as a weapon of attack. Your hate is derived from your outlook on humanity which is the difference between you and me. You think the government is power hungry and mad and that everyone in it is out to exploit the weak. While sometimes in history that happens, more often than not...
Choo69 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix the leaders are usually people who have the right intentions, even Hitler thought he was doing good. That is why we have the psych test. To figure the possible consequences if a dangerous object is being given to the wrong hands. It is a precaution, hell, if you don't trust the government make it a third party organisation made up of doctors from everywhere.
There is a difference between serfdom and slavery. Serfdom is an economic class of circumstance.
Choo69 1 year ago
Comment removed
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Slavery is ownership of a human being. Which incidentally infringes on civil rights, defining them as a lower class than human. In a sense everyone is a slave to the economy, especially to money.
I know that horrible things have happened in the past to the common people and that there are several who are looking to exploit them. But in this day and age, they can't do that. The freedom of information combined with technology has made this world closer than it has ever been before.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 "those who don't know history are bound to repeat it" and history shows that the common people (the majority, which are mostly good people) are constantly robbed and killed due to the lies fed from a few people who also happen to be the people getting most of the plunder. hmmm? how curious
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix The world is getting smaller, anything about mass human exploitation would be scorned upon. Look at religion, great example. Religion is dying out, mostly the extreme ones like Islam and Scientology. These religions were built by the several who sought to exploit the common people. They were destroyed with the help of mass communication.
So simply saying that having no guns would disempower the many is wrong.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 islam grows i think, and depending on how you look at the religious, they have all grown in numbers as multiple people, because of mass communication, see many religions as buckets of water from the same lake, all having something to offer in philosophy or actual unexplained phenomenon, also science doesn't necessarily end religion or escape dogma. Whats w/ the "guns and absence of religion ?or a small world? being scorned? like nazi's were (after they were praised)? didn't stop them.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I was just saying that Hitler thought he was doing the right thing, for his people, which is just another viewpoint of what leaders do.
Mao Zedong starved his people to death but also brought employment rates to a sky high and lifted parts of China out of a third world state. Some people thinks he did great, others not so much. Matter of perspective. I'm not saying what Hitler did was right, but he thought he did.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 i like how you wrote "Mao Zedong starved his people to death but also brought employment rates to a sky high" ....that is comedy, maybe if we murder 30% of our population, i could get a job, ha ha
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix ;) yeah it's funny that some people stand by his decisions, I liked his idea - to bring China out of a third world state, but his means of doing so were extreme. But who could know what would've happened if he didn't? I mean, people were already so poor. That begs the question whether the means justify the ends.
Like the atom bombs America laid on Japan. It ended world war, but at what cost?
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 Machiavelli principals are shit. also food,free cleen water and electricity is not what these people do,(they kill folks who try to make this stuff out of turn), ever, because the good people have no desire to ever be those people, so they don't have the power to destroy or create whole nations. unless they unite and wake the fuck up and start telling it how it is so the minions of the asshole control freaks stop doing what they are doing and we get the world back from the royal bitches.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix the world isn't divided into good and bad people, you have to remember that. most of the time the 'evil' side will never be united, that is why the good always triumph because they are united against an enemy whereas evil are full of people willing to exploit, corrupt for power.
not all people in power are evil either, royalty sometimes have their good and bad. which is the very weakness of a monarchy, it stays within the family.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 if people in power appear good or are good it still seems to be the bad ones that always steer empires into despotism and terrible dictatorships or monarchies, or the like, that suppress people/resources and also cause genocide in more dirrect ways, ie. human sacrifice, torture ordained by "god" or "logic", detainment/exicution without trial, etc. "we the people" governing ourselves, is a new idea that can defeat this cycle of tyrrany, but it needs us to work.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 you say that the evil side will always be divided, but how much crap will they spew trying to take over the world? how much will we let them spew, we have to wake the world up and take it back, staying non-violent for as long as posible, yet spewing truth and thought provoking stuff as much as possible before we are fighting their most loyal brainwashed minions and/or drones in online worlds of fiction made real. yes just like in the old movie, forget the name."master and commander?"
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix You're saying this as if we ARE under control. Do you believe the world to be so?
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 how can we be under control? bailouts of trillions of dollars, alot of which was supposed to go to the failing housing market then just set off to unknown parties, that sounds legal, how about the patriot act?!!!! or the disarming of americans in disasters (even economic?)the economic enlavement of over 100 countries from euro trash royalty? business as usuall? nothing to be alarmed about? you should watch "confessions of an economic hitman," or "freedom to fascism"
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Don't see how European monarchies are enslaving their people. They get to live a lavish lifestyle in return for being in charge of the running of government. Well, the UK is an exception because the monarch over there practically has no power.
By the way, the mess that America has gotten itself into is pretty funny, the rest of the world is laughing at the once great nation it was.
Anyway, people don't give a rat's ass whether they are under control, as long as they have money.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 your grasp on reality hurts my brain to even imagine, lets start with money, what if the money is barley worth the paper it's printed on?
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Sorry, as long as they have food, water and shelter. Nobody gives a fuck about freedom. We are fighting wars in the middle east for freedom? Fuck no, we are fighting because we hate muslims and their dirty ass way of living. This thing about people being different has turned us into monsters. Everyone hates each other because they're different. If they're happy and not interrupting our lives why the hell should we give a crap? They like monarchy, fine, as long as there's no pain.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 so, ok, your not talking about money, exactly, you are talking about pacification with decent living standards, food and entertainment. These 3 are an old tactic w/ the roman empire. and are always rationed and taken away to get people riled up, pissed off & make them want the 3 things, if we can make this shit ourselves, problem solved also, you say"Everyone hates eachother" i don't think so most strangers who look different than me are not assholes.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I know, but it's a general statement. We are no longer in the medieval era and yet we still find the weird or strange unacceptable and they must die or conform in order to belong in society.
All the world needs is for the basics, food, water, shelter, education and health care. The rest is luxury. If people could understand that we would not have wars. Of course, you're gonna say the government can manipulate such conditions to their advantage, but if they too realised it...
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 we the people, being informed in the usa would make they (the masters, or us) "realise it" because they would be us, the empowered, which we still are, We have to inform the sleepy heads first before any violence starts among the idiots.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix The problem is, violence has already started and nobody has woken up. The US war on terror is going worse than expected, they're just not telling anyone. This war is useless. But once we pull out the terrorists will count it as a victory and no American is going to accept that... none.
While we fight there are third world countries suffering from famine, disease. The money we spend making bombs etc would be put to better use saving the innocent. I hope people soon wake up.
Choo69 1 year ago 2
@Choo69 i wake them up, i don't just hope they wake up, which is useless.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I say hope in a bleak way. People hate change and things that take time, which is necessary to change things for the better.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 i don't see all these haters you keep talking about. the majority seem nice.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Nah, pretty sure everyone hates someone unjustly in some way or another.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 and i still don't think anyone but maybe 5% of the population, all idiots, think wierdos should die or conform. maybe you haven't gotten out and socialized much, but there are alot of nice people all over the place, from what i see. sure there are assholes that come out of the woodwork to rob you, the good folks mind their own business, but you are right there are problems, just not so bad as you think, there is also realization of the problems and a reversal of these type intentions
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix The small world, the Earth has become a small village because of communications. With the exceptions of countries who are employing censorship of media, everyone is included in this village. Like a village, everyone knows what each other is doing and that's where this "rampant propaganda" of yours comes in. Movies, television, the paper is providing us with the moral and social standards, whether this is propaganda or not is another issue. These standards are applied to everyone.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Everyone will be "scorned" if any such country would step out of line too far. This is what we are heading towards, we are only currently moving towards internationalist ideas.
Religion is the one being scorned, if it does step out of line. Islam and Scientology are the examples. All because of this village.
This shows the power of words over guns, solving conflicts without the need for firearms. It is what I've been saying about a "gun-less" world.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 religion might just be highjacked by "several who sought to exploit the common people." not neccessarily built for it, except scientology (recent history). Prime example of dogma in science the fixed eliptical orbit of the earth around the sun, is not fixed, but is still taught everywhere almost a hundred years later to push this idea we live in a fixed universe so anything wierd happening must be us. same thing religion was used for by the few., anything that went wrong was our fault.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Choo69 and what do you mean by this? what do i hate? you said "your perception is distorted by hate" what do you think i am sounding hateful towards?
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I mean that, and I'm assuming here, that some of your own personal experiences has led to a biased view on life. It is pessimistic, I know I've seen cases where people can be overtly manipulative, psychotic. But that's just the few and it's rare. The good in people can astonish you sometimes, it's just a matter of finding those people. Geographically, the bad tend to band together because of them being outcasts to the majority of good people in society.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 and it IS "scorned apon." Slavery is still very real in all forms, including children for sex, war IS "human exploitation," Economic enslavement is controled famine and genocide. and it is all frowned apon, just not enough. mo bettah, with big loud formidable "frowns"(mass peacefull protest from gun owners)
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix Actually we are all slaves to money, we cannot live without it. In turn we are slaves to the economy, the seemingly self-sufficiency of it. If the economy fails then we will see mass famine. Genocide? Probably. It's what Hitler did after the Great Depression.
These issues... you can see that the world isn't perfect but the world is working towards solving these problems. Even if it does seem governments do nothing, people's voices are speaking and they will damn sure hear it.
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 if you think it is an accident that we ALREADY HAVE MASS FAMINE (which you seem to not realize), i don't know where to start. I'll try, we p get photographs on the moon & mars and change genes that assimilate plants and copywrite them, AND COLLIDE PARTICALS but we can"t make rivers of fresh water from the ocean or air and pour them in deserts where, also all or most or a third or 1% of the worlds urban organic waste awaits, all growing food w/ no electricity, that's just too complicated
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix I don't think it's an accident, nor do I think it is on purpose caused by the few. If there is mass famine there is two things wrong in the country:
1. The economy
2. Corruption in government
While 1 and 2 can both be cause and effects of each other it basically boils down to one of the two.
Also, while advancements in science have been extraordinary, it is disappointing to see we can't solve the natural resources issue. There is also the businessmen who don't want it to be solved
Choo69 1 year ago
@Choo69 watch "confessions of an economic hitman" or "freedom to fascism" or check out monsanto's new products or read "the peoples history of theUS" .... i'm pretty sure, it's on purpose.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
if everyone had guns we would not have snipers, because they would be killed quickly by the sane public, not to mention trading off any hitlers or emperialism out of control. the usa can get their country back by any means neccassary.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix
Or wipe themselves out by cack-handed rednecks, drug-dealing street gangs and angry school kids mowing down their classmates. In the meantime justifying the legality of an item which is entirely designed to kill stuff on hypothetical scenarios of communist invaders and civil anarchy. Thank god the usa has guns eh?
HarrisonRocks 1 year ago
@HarrisonRocks high school shootings and gang violence and drunk hicks shooting people is not so bad when compared to the alternative. Criminals will make guns if they have to. and before guns it's not like swords ever did any damage, right? what every german jew in WWII had an AK-47? maybe they wouldn't have been slaughtered like animals, that's not hypothetical, that's what governments eventually do, if you let them.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix
What?! So "hypothetically" if the NRA dropped pistols and instruction manuals over eastern europe then that well-organised, well equipped German blitzreig that smashed through France and Britains combined miltary wouldn't have stood a chance now that the jewish women and children could get in on the action? Thats downright right fucking stuuuuupid sir.
And off the record, in the UK guns are illegal (alot of farmers have seem to them though :s) and we're "communist free" thanks.
HarrisonRocks 1 year ago 2
@HarrisonRocks i'm saying that the nazi party, or anything like the nazi party and the war would have been cut down before it got too big IF there was always a well informed well armed public, everywhere, but there was not, so the world may never, know, but i know i'd want a gunfight before i'd want to walk into a ditch i just dug with another 10,000 people.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix even when i was 8 yrs old, i knew that.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@HarrisonRocks men also didn't have guns, not just "women and children" as you say. They were not allowed to own guns, why do you say women and children couldn't own guns?, no jew could own guns, sex had nothing to do with it.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
@Idolcruisefix
Also killing a nazi meant everybody paid the price, theres an entire viillage in France that was wiped out (700 people I think) because of 1 dead nazi and it was the wrong village anyway!
The men bit was a typo too btw, i missed it out.
HarrisonRocks 1 year ago
@HarrisonRocks if being a good servant to any possible psychos in your path(including the ones ordering armies around) is your plan to survive, then you are lost. i would much rather not risk genocide in my own way, by assuring the psycho/s have a short climb to world domination, one ending in death, or imprisonment, not a bunch of blind service and help from god? is this where we are going with this?.
Idolcruisefix 1 year ago
" I can't even swim,I, I can't drive, I was gonna learn to drive but then I thought what if I crash in to a lake?"
Zurdza 1 year ago
"I'm probably liberal because i'm frightened of everyone"
evelesk 2 years ago 24
shit- skinheads vs him...what happened next? o_o
MrCommenterguy 2 years ago 3
"I hope that drunk doesn't go mental"
mochaseptember 2 years ago 21
Whrs the full thing?
saqib09 2 years ago
omg it's brilliant!
can't believe i didn't stumble upon it before!
LOL
zuzik67 2 years ago 4
"'I'm not a fighter I'm a bleeder"
21Sinner 2 years ago 38
That's actually a Woody Allen line, can't remember what film it's in, but it definitely is one of his...
MrBradipo73 2 years ago 3
@21Sinner wasn't that a Woody Allen line? Not that it would detract anything from this amazing comedian's talent...
MrBradipo73 1 year ago
Him and Eddie Izzard can not be compared cs they have different comedy styles. But Dylan Moran is perfect for stand up
wellsey69 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah, and eddy isnt funny
BlexxiBlade 2 years ago
the master
mothernature44 2 years ago 6
fhis guy does things to me in places I never knew I had !!!!!
mothernature44 2 years ago 6
which places?
morbidbynature 2 years ago
now that would be between me and him ! ( in my dreams !!! )
mothernature44 2 years ago
Very much like Eddie Izzard
marshagreen 4 years ago
much better than eddie izzard
ShaiGarENTP 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
ok. so im officially in love with englishmen
PeaceLoveEtc 4 years ago
wow except for he's irish. iiim an idiot. well i love irishmen even more than.
PeaceLoveEtc 4 years ago 20
@PeaceLoveEtc what does that mean? I can't make sense of it at all!?!
123RUTH123 1 year ago
peaceloveetc, this broad is irish lol
Toastpolice 2 years ago
"i decided it would take at least 3 of me to defend myself against a third of one of them"
probably the best line ever in comedy
i genuinely think that dylan is the closest thng to a good poet in this day and age
kinda ironic actually considerin he wrote what he described as "bad poetry" before gettin into comedy
oscarkev190 4 years ago 10
...well you all have guns ...and they do have a limited amount of household applications
hianda 4 years ago
Im not a fighter i'm a bleeder,lol
Nusbah 4 years ago
tattoos on his teeth - brilliant
pr1ncess81 5 years ago
hahahaha you gotta love him!
boondoggle89 5 years ago
amazing!!!
MotenaMsPigguette 5 years ago
brilliant! just brilliant!
myname5548 5 years ago
"i decided it would take at least 3 of me to defend myself against a third of one of them"
lol
plugindave 5 years ago
this man is amazing! (L)
Jumpup123 5 years ago
brilliant. Dylan is awesome.
thanks for uploading
Soos1 5 years ago