I noticed that too about the different note at 0:40, I think it's a half-step higher than the other versions, it has a more major sound in the harmonic context of that run of notes. I wonder, though, does anyone know how two versions can come about like this with Bach? I mean isn't there a definitive version?
I noticed that too about the different note at 0:40, I think it's a half-step higher than the other versions, it has a more major sound in the harmonic context of that run of notes. I wonder, though, does anyone know how two versions can come about like this with Bach? I mean isn't there a definitive version?
She plays a different note than Rosalyn Tureck about 0:38 sec into the video and does it again when the pattern repeats. But love her Bach more than anyone else.
i love this interpretation, she really does bring out all the suttleties that in bach's music. it's divine from the very first note. but please less camera rotation !!
@jwchappy1 Immediately after the opening Bach likes to go to the dominant chord :) almost always I think... in this case, D major, so that can justify the C-sharp there, and I think it sounds good... it gives a bit of color... with a C-natural (the way I had to play for my exam) it sounds a little flatter....
@jwchappy1 Duh? You can hear that the key clearly moves to the dominant in the fourth measure as a contrasting response to the first statement in the tonic. C# is the leading tone to the dominant in G. In a couple more measures there is a dominant of the dominant (there's a single G# before Bach turns it back quickly to D) before the sequence begins. In fact, there's more D major than G prior to the repeat, a structural move to the dominant which is expected in the first half of a binary form.
I think, the way she plays Prelude is like, The first round kinda of full tone note. Look at how she press the note, and after the repeat, she only press a little note down, (meaning she a very superb touch)
Angela Hewitt is one of the best Bach performers. It won't do you any good to criticize her when you probably can't do any better. learn from her and if you don't like it then don't do it. I think she's great
Her Bach has pleasing sound but incredibly boring. I didnt know Bach can be good background music. She might still have some fame while she is alive, not after
It might actually be an old manuscript variation after the repeat, or a trend in Bach's repertoire. Otherwise, she could have easily recorded it again.
@martinhablaespagnol There are elements in her playing I appreciate very much, but I like when Bach is played with certain amount of austerity, which she doesn't provide at all.
Yes I've played it. It sounds way better without the sharp, and that's the way Bach wrote it. I'm actually not a huge fan of her interpretation of this piece- there are better versions out there.
Say, could you please help me with this piece? I have no idea whether or not to play a C# in measures 16 or 27. I believe there should be a sharp in M16 since the D to C# is a half step, just like the G to F# in the last measure. Thanks.
Sure, no problem. Yes, you should play a C# in m. 16, but not in m. 27. There aren't any C sharps in either hand there. The recording of this that I like best is by Edward Adwell.
@princessatheart88 Interesting that you like Aldwell's performances of WTC. I have his recordings of both books and they're excellent. He's not as well known as others but I personally prefer his recordings better than Gould.
@benjbloch Im pretty sure its supposed to be a c natural
012jsd 2 weeks ago
good, but she has too much of the "mmmm yes I am quite snooty and classical" thing going on
JHighland1 3 weeks ago
Bach + Hewitt + Steinway = W + O + W
keishadelacerna 1 month ago
wait, is it actually a C# instead of a C? i always play a C....
irkwang 3 months ago
Excellent! Excellent!
mikegallegos7 3 months ago in playlist Bach, J.S._Keyboard
"Speech with and without thought is to be compared with the playing of a piece of music with and without thought"
P.I. 341
jofman1988 5 months ago
aww, the music is adorable.
Pretendkid 6 months ago
Wonderful control in that immortal fugue :)
felipilloo1984 6 months ago
... o ridiculous ... twinkle in his eye ? for the likes of you ? ... J S Bach was much above such talk ... a professional in everyway !
MusicPredominates 7 months ago
This looks creepily like it was animated (I know it's not, or at least I hope, it's not)
Wonderful playing though.
dragon84209 8 months ago
I noticed that too about the different note at 0:40, I think it's a half-step higher than the other versions, it has a more major sound in the harmonic context of that run of notes. I wonder, though, does anyone know how two versions can come about like this with Bach? I mean isn't there a definitive version?
benjbloch 1 year ago
I noticed that too about the different note at 0:40, I think it's a half-step higher than the other versions, it has a more major sound in the harmonic context of that run of notes. I wonder, though, does anyone know how two versions can come about like this with Bach? I mean isn't there a definitive version?
benjbloch 1 year ago
I love the way she makes the fugue dance--Bach in one of his merriest moods!
soami2u 1 year ago
A few seconds later than 0:38 I mean, about 0:40
Justme1635438 1 year ago
She plays a different note than Rosalyn Tureck about 0:38 sec into the video and does it again when the pattern repeats. But love her Bach more than anyone else.
Justme1635438 1 year ago
Comment removed
Justme1635438 1 year ago
Comment removed
Justme1635438 1 year ago
i love this interpretation, she really does bring out all the suttleties that in bach's music. it's divine from the very first note. but please less camera rotation !!
yurtzenika 1 year ago
you said its in g major and at the begining you playd a Csharp.duh
jwchappy1 1 year ago
@jwchappy1 Immediately after the opening Bach likes to go to the dominant chord :) almost always I think... in this case, D major, so that can justify the C-sharp there, and I think it sounds good... it gives a bit of color... with a C-natural (the way I had to play for my exam) it sounds a little flatter....
kb27787 1 year ago
@jwchappy1 Duh? You can hear that the key clearly moves to the dominant in the fourth measure as a contrasting response to the first statement in the tonic. C# is the leading tone to the dominant in G. In a couple more measures there is a dominant of the dominant (there's a single G# before Bach turns it back quickly to D) before the sequence begins. In fact, there's more D major than G prior to the repeat, a structural move to the dominant which is expected in the first half of a binary form.
Trompetteenchamade 1 year ago
@Trompetteenchamade sorry that Duh! comment was made by my 8 yr old son - i will be promptly changing my password settings!!
jwchappy1 1 year ago
I think, the way she plays Prelude is like, The first round kinda of full tone note. Look at how she press the note, and after the repeat, she only press a little note down, (meaning she a very superb touch)
D8018 1 year ago
Angela Hewitt is one of the best Bach performers. It won't do you any good to criticize her when you probably can't do any better. learn from her and if you don't like it then don't do it. I think she's great
katerinawsy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's probably just me, but the C-sharp at 0:41 and 1:06 sounds out of place.
WMWWWWWWMWWW 1 year ago
@WMWWWWWWMWWW
It isn't just you, it struck me immediately, too.
ktriebler 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's probably just me, but the C-sharp at 0:41 and 1:06 sounds out of place.
WMWWWWWWMWWW 1 year ago
Comment removed
WMWWWWWWMWWW 1 year ago
it would be good but she plays it like a romantic piece.
pangaea611 1 year ago
Does anyone know where I can get the "Bach: The English Suites No 2." played by her?
REGOLITTLE 1 year ago
@REGOLITTLE
I think in every classical recordshop
Greetings
Jan.
janvkimm 1 year ago
Amazing! her technique is superb!!!
The fugue is usually played slower than that and to me it sounds sluggish that way but she brings it to life and it's just amazing!
I hope I can play even half as well as she does by the time of my ALCM exams (this is one of my pieces! lol after seeing that I feel so... unskilled)
kb27787 1 year ago
Her Bach has pleasing sound but incredibly boring. I didnt know Bach can be good background music. She might still have some fame while she is alive, not after
terrygowork 1 year ago 3
@terrygowork how can you write that after listening to the Fugue? I agree that the Prelude is a bit "flat" and unimaginative, but not the Fugue.
bontempo01 1 year ago
WOW!!!! This is SO beautiful and so delicately and sensitively played - thank you for posting!
Ms Hewitts' ornaments are effortless and simply glide into the passage work without disrupting the flow! WOW!
practicecrazypianist 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A PIANO is A MARVELLOUS VEHICLE?????lollll a PIANO IS NO CAR TO DRIVE!BITCH!
TURBOKNIGHTRIDER 1 year ago
@TURBOKNIGHTRIDER - behave yourself you vulgar little man
mattnotmatt2 1 year ago
@mattnotmatt2 lol BE CAREFUL what you SAY DUDE OK!
TURBOKNIGHTRIDER 1 year ago
I went to a concert and saw her preform the goldberg variations, she has incredible talent.
techyesboy 1 year ago
Im studying this and BACH is my nightmare!
well done
Ueberbacker 1 year ago
I am not the finest music expert, but man, this is soo nice !!
siku5it 2 years ago
@truxaltom, her error is in measure 7 on the second beat.
princessatheart88 2 years ago
It might actually be an old manuscript variation after the repeat, or a trend in Bach's repertoire. Otherwise, she could have easily recorded it again.
Jbigula 2 years ago
what does WTC stand for?
spiritwinds56 2 years ago
The well tempered clavier
ophirisr 2 years ago
world trade center. or well-tempered clavier. ;)
bachaddict 2 years ago
@spiritwinds56 Well tempered klavier
mdeonx16 1 year ago
I like her. She looks just like Elin! RESPECT
Pladask 2 years ago
I love this - apart from the C sharps that shouldn't be there.
yourforte 2 years ago
she plays bach like chopin!
egvztpwa 2 years ago
@egvztpwa - thats what I think and feel too - either chopin or bach - so what is the sence of this ? Can anybody tell me ?
martinhablaespagnol 1 year ago
@martinhablaespagnol There are elements in her playing I appreciate very much, but I like when Bach is played with certain amount of austerity, which she doesn't provide at all.
pbazant 5 months ago
Nope, the C# is a mistake. Just checked the score. And she made that mistake twice.
princessatheart88 2 years ago
but... it sounds horrible without the sharp! have you played/heard it before? i just played it on my piano and it sounds like a dying squirrel...
373raindance 2 years ago
Yes I've played it. It sounds way better without the sharp, and that's the way Bach wrote it. I'm actually not a huge fan of her interpretation of this piece- there are better versions out there.
princessatheart88 2 years ago
Say, could you please help me with this piece? I have no idea whether or not to play a C# in measures 16 or 27. I believe there should be a sharp in M16 since the D to C# is a half step, just like the G to F# in the last measure. Thanks.
373raindance 2 years ago
Sure, no problem. Yes, you should play a C# in m. 16, but not in m. 27. There aren't any C sharps in either hand there. The recording of this that I like best is by Edward Adwell.
princessatheart88 2 years ago
k, thx!
373raindance 2 years ago
@princessatheart88 Interesting that you like Aldwell's performances of WTC. I have his recordings of both books and they're excellent. He's not as well known as others but I personally prefer his recordings better than Gould.
dmcII 2 years ago
@princessatheart88
I'm missing her error, which measure are you all hearing this c#?
truxaltom 2 years ago
Hmm, a C# in the RH in bar 7? Sounds very strange. And it can't be a booboo, cause she also does it in the repeat...
ivelosthewilltolive 2 years ago
Maybe she intended to play C# in the repeat in order to cover the mistake that she had made, that is, to make the music consistent in some sense....
MgcMrMistoffelees 2 years ago
angela hewitt
is
our next
great hope
when it comes to the piano!
once again think God!
MrDouglasfairbanks 2 years ago
haha yes camera work is like some cheesy 360 wrap-around camera shot from the 1970s
prelude is great, fugue is too fast and a little foggy
justinmutchler 2 years ago
what do you mean by "prelude is great" and "fugue is too fast" ? are they 2 separate things? thanks.
asdfasdfsdfsd 2 years ago
haha so true! But i'm a 70s kind of guy, and it made the vid pretty great.
373raindance 2 years ago
Loved this piece from the very first note but, the camera work is making me a bit dizzy so I'll just close my eyes and listen...
Toccata123 2 years ago 12
Love the music. Loved the playing. Hated the camera work; spoilt the whole thing.
Fredobel51 2 years ago
Are these actual live performances? The sound doesn't quite seem to match her fingers.
jimjoyce25 2 years ago
I love Angela Hewitt's interpretations of Bach. Her voicing is amazing, and her ornamentation is always to perfect.
AdamDavidFroman 2 years ago 15
extraordinary interpretation by this lady pianist and artist, playing the colosal work by genius Johann Sebastian
beethomozart 2 years ago
Absolutely awesome!!! But fugue was too fast.
MrMichalis 2 years ago
much better then Eunice Norton !!!!!
somedudeplayingpiano 2 years ago
i can't get enough!! it's lovely
zxcvuiop45 2 years ago 2
wonderful
firebreathone2 2 years ago
Mas bravos!!!!!!!!!!
Cesar Amaro
6cuerdas6 2 years ago
yes
fmk3141 2 years ago
Merci et bravo Angela pour ce jeu raffiné
ComtedeMassat 3 years ago