Actually the oldest survivor and the highest decorated still survives in MEXICO the USS JOHN RODGERS DD574 but her existance is on the bubble hopefully she will return to the US later this year to become a museum ship
actually a destroyer might be able to, depending when it getts caught, the 5 inch guns could destroy the bridge torp launchers if any, some smaller guns and stuff and the torps could sink it
Its a shame, but out of the 175 Fletcher class Destroyers, only 4 survive to this day:
USS The Sullivans (DD-537)
HNS Velos, D-16 (Former USS Charrlotte, DD-581)
USS Kidd (DD-661)
USS Cassin Young (DD-793)
Another 19, like the USS Johnston (DD-557) and the USS Hoel (DD-533) also survive, but as shipwrecks, so whether you want to count them as "Surviving examples" is debateable.
I only said that for those of you who want to know if there are any Fletchers still out there
That's true, but that would actually depend on how close the DD could get before being noticed, if it got close enough to land a few torpedoes into her then maybe, but it's only plausible, and not likely.
It almost happened like biukucanoe said. Yamato almost got sunk by a submarine days before and had to turn hard to avoid a torpedo screen from the Fletchers during the engagement.
I said a SINGLE Destroyer. A floatilla of Destroyers, maybe, but a Single, lone destroyer would stant no chance. In fact, at best a Battleship's main guns would have torn a DD apart before it got in range (USS Johnston only got close enough in the Battle off Samar because it used a tactic known as "Follow the splashes")
2) There was no IJN Takeo; the Only Jap BBs during WWII were the Kongo, Haruna, Hiei, Kirishima, Fuso, Yamashiro, Ise, Hyuga, Nagato, Mutsu, Yamato and Musashi; none of which were sunk by single tin cans.
3) If you ment Takao, that was a CA that was crippled in the Palawan Passage during the battle of Leyte Gulf in '44 and spent the rest of the war in Singapore, and if u ment Higgins, the only USS Higgins that existed is a DDG currently in serivce
@frankydman IJN Takeo did exist but its a BC not a BB and it was sunk during midway with it taking 13 destroyers and 12 light cruisers until battleship new york got its guns on it and fired 4 salvos there ending IJN Takeo
@frankydman true on the 5 inch guns...... but if a fletcher was able to put all its torpedoes in a general are it could easly sink the Yamato....now it would be very hard to do so but it could be done
No, Yamato took 11 torpedoes before sinking in 1945. Fletcher class destroyers only launch ten at a time, even then Yamato will dodge a few of them, plus it's armor should shrug off torpedo hits.
@Exilninja nah bro if the Destroyer got close enough so the arc couldnt hit it then it would never miss a torpedo and 10+ torpedoes is enough to sink it just FYI
Stop right there. The Yamato's main guns are capable of firing over 26 miles, it's six inch guns can fire at least 10 miles, and the 3.9 inchers at close ranges. No way would one destroyer get that close to it that it's guns couldn't train on it. Take the Battle off Samar for example, it hit the destroyer USS Hoel (Fletcher-class) at a range of 19 miles, which almost sunk it. So do some research first before speaking a load of rubbish.
@Exilninja ok so just to let you know the Yamato's smallest guns were the 6.1" cruiser guns, and it only had 5" Flak guns, .98" guns and im going to say that 1) yes the cruiser guns *SHOULD* key word there get the destroyer. 2) do your own research because you obviouly dont know what your talikng about cuz the gun sizes were 18.1", 6.1", 5", .98", and the last 2 were only AA cover just FYI 3) its range was 25 miles (40Km) which were its 18.1" guns and due to the out of date Fire control system
in battle off samar 2 of 3 DDs sunk but Yamato was sent packing back to Japan and Japanese Navy was effectively out of business due largely to tincan sailors
This mod needs a original bf1942?Please answer me!Thanks!
MrRochiam 8 months ago
oh god D: sry I ment the wrong ship :/
neunzehn99 8 months ago
xD that's not a yamato :DDDDDDDD
neunzehn99 8 months ago
why didnt the yamato shoot back, huh? if it would then that fletcher of urs would have sunk with 1 salvo of shells :'D
zameliz 10 months ago
@zameliz I was too close for it to traverse it's aim onto me.
98RamMagnum 10 months ago
@98RamMagnum By the time someone was in it at least.
98RamMagnum 10 months ago
why did it take you so many shots to sink that first destroyer?????
gmen999 11 months ago
@zXTheFallenXz It's actually Battlefield Vietnam, but with a mod, Battlegroup 42
98RamMagnum 1 year ago
Comment removed
hellomon100 1 year ago
Actually there is one more Fletcher in existance the USS JOHN RODGERS now down in Mexico hopefully she will come home this year
usselliot76 1 year ago
Actually the oldest survivor and the highest decorated still survives in MEXICO the USS JOHN RODGERS DD574 but her existance is on the bubble hopefully she will return to the US later this year to become a museum ship
usselliot76 1 year ago
great music !!
dudipl 1 year ago
actually i meant torp the battleship but ya
MajSingletary 2 years ago
actually a destroyer might be able to, depending when it getts caught, the 5 inch guns could destroy the bridge torp launchers if any, some smaller guns and stuff and the torps could sink it
MajSingletary 2 years ago
Uh, most battleships didn't have torpedos in WWII
frankydman 2 years ago
love the song
Steelhorsetransferco 2 years ago
Its a shame, but out of the 175 Fletcher class Destroyers, only 4 survive to this day:
USS The Sullivans (DD-537)
HNS Velos, D-16 (Former USS Charrlotte, DD-581)
USS Kidd (DD-661)
USS Cassin Young (DD-793)
Another 19, like the USS Johnston (DD-557) and the USS Hoel (DD-533) also survive, but as shipwrecks, so whether you want to count them as "Surviving examples" is debateable.
I only said that for those of you who want to know if there are any Fletchers still out there
frankydman 2 years ago
Actually, i only knew about The Sullivans surviving, thanks for that, more things to try to get a chance to visit.
98RamMagnum 2 years ago
I like FLETCHER more THAN YAMATO
because It's my sir name!!!!!!
TopGearYamato 2 years ago
Gee i wonder how old you are..
dybro2 2 years ago
In reality, a single DD could never sink a Yamato class BB, because its 5-inch guns wouldnt so much as dent Yamato
frankydman 2 years ago
That's true, but that would actually depend on how close the DD could get before being noticed, if it got close enough to land a few torpedoes into her then maybe, but it's only plausible, and not likely.
98RamMagnum 2 years ago
It almost happened like biukucanoe said. Yamato almost got sunk by a submarine days before and had to turn hard to avoid a torpedo screen from the Fletchers during the engagement.
Taospark 2 years ago
wrong destroyers have been know to sink a battleship in ww2 a 5 inch gun fired at the superstructure of a battle ship would do massive damage
golfisgreat123 2 years ago
I said a SINGLE Destroyer. A floatilla of Destroyers, maybe, but a Single, lone destroyer would stant no chance. In fact, at best a Battleship's main guns would have torn a DD apart before it got in range (USS Johnston only got close enough in the Battle off Samar because it used a tactic known as "Follow the splashes")
frankydman 2 years ago
may 1943 the uss higgens launch 4 torpedos at the ijn takeo 2 of the 4 hit and sank the battleship
golfisgreat123 2 years ago
I've never heard of the USS Higgens, nor the IJN Takeo.
98RamMagnum 2 years ago
@98RamMagnum that USS Higgens is real but it is a modern missile destroyer
hellomon100 1 year ago
Ok, 3 things:
1) there was no USS Higgens
2) There was no IJN Takeo; the Only Jap BBs during WWII were the Kongo, Haruna, Hiei, Kirishima, Fuso, Yamashiro, Ise, Hyuga, Nagato, Mutsu, Yamato and Musashi; none of which were sunk by single tin cans.
3) If you ment Takao, that was a CA that was crippled in the Palawan Passage during the battle of Leyte Gulf in '44 and spent the rest of the war in Singapore, and if u ment Higgins, the only USS Higgins that existed is a DDG currently in serivce
frankydman 2 years ago
@frankydman IJN Takeo did exist but its a BC not a BB and it was sunk during midway with it taking 13 destroyers and 12 light cruisers until battleship new york got its guns on it and fired 4 salvos there ending IJN Takeo
hellomon100 1 year ago
@hellomon100
Ok, your sources are complete bullsh**
There was NO IJN Takeo at Midway, or anywhere during WWII.
What is your source because it is obviously wrong.
frankydman 1 year ago
Comment removed
hellomon100 1 year ago
Comment removed
hellomon100 1 year ago
@hellomon100
The only Japanese Heavy Cruiser sunk at Midway was the Mikuma
And there was no Jap heavy cruiser called Takeo
frankydman 1 year ago
Comment removed
hellomon100 1 year ago
@frankydman ill back you up on this there was a Takao class but the ships in the class were like the maya etc
gmen999 11 months ago
@hellomon100 Are you trolling? The New York wasn't even near the Pacific theater till after '44.
98RamMagnum 1 year ago
Comment removed
hellomon100 1 year ago
Comment removed
hellomon100 1 year ago
@golfisgreat123 just so you know the Takeo was not a battleship!!!! it was a heavy crusier and the name was never Takeo it was just a class type durp
gmen999 11 months ago
@frankydman true on the 5 inch guns...... but if a fletcher was able to put all its torpedoes in a general are it could easly sink the Yamato....now it would be very hard to do so but it could be done
gmen999 11 months ago
@gmen999
No, Yamato took 11 torpedoes before sinking in 1945. Fletcher class destroyers only launch ten at a time, even then Yamato will dodge a few of them, plus it's armor should shrug off torpedo hits.
Exilninja 10 months ago
@Exilninja nah bro if the Destroyer got close enough so the arc couldnt hit it then it would never miss a torpedo and 10+ torpedoes is enough to sink it just FYI
gmen999 10 months ago
@gmen999
"If the destroyer got close enough"
Stop right there. The Yamato's main guns are capable of firing over 26 miles, it's six inch guns can fire at least 10 miles, and the 3.9 inchers at close ranges. No way would one destroyer get that close to it that it's guns couldn't train on it. Take the Battle off Samar for example, it hit the destroyer USS Hoel (Fletcher-class) at a range of 19 miles, which almost sunk it. So do some research first before speaking a load of rubbish.
Exilninja 9 months ago
@Exilninja ok so just to let you know the Yamato's smallest guns were the 6.1" cruiser guns, and it only had 5" Flak guns, .98" guns and im going to say that 1) yes the cruiser guns *SHOULD* key word there get the destroyer. 2) do your own research because you obviouly dont know what your talikng about cuz the gun sizes were 18.1", 6.1", 5", .98", and the last 2 were only AA cover just FYI 3) its range was 25 miles (40Km) which were its 18.1" guns and due to the out of date Fire control system
gmen999 9 months ago
@Exilninja had horrible accuracy, so before you challenge someone maby you should look up some facts so you dont look stupid
gmen999 9 months ago
@gmen999
Really? Look up "Battle off Samar". You will find Yamatos accuracy wasn't "horrible" at all.
The chances of one destroyer getting to point-blank range of a battleship is about a million to one. For any battleship.
Exilninja 9 months ago
in battle off samar 2 of 3 DDs sunk but Yamato was sent packing back to Japan and Japanese Navy was effectively out of business due largely to tincan sailors
biukucanoe 3 years ago
great song
rommel5055 3 years ago
面白くは無い動画だな
SakaiSaburou 3 years ago
もちろんそうではない
98RamMagnum 3 years ago
orly?
sp33dracerx2 3 years ago