Can a rolex watch be formed from a bomb exploding? No therefore an all powerful being created earth in 3 days then day and night, then plants, then the sun, then the rest of the some odd billions of galaxies in the universe in a day.
I don't see why we can't teach our kids this in school.
Evolutionists don't talk about the big bang because it has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is simply the observation of life changing over time which is proven by the facts that you people choose to pretend do not exist.
You need to 1. Stop making scarecrow arguments. 2. Wake up! Creationism is certainly not a theory, it doesn't qualify as a hypotheses, in fact it isn't even a coherent idea.
"So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator."
Hmm I wonder why they excluded the next sentence?
"But if the universe is really completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?"
I think it's funny that people refuse to consider that the energy that begot the Big Bang and God aren't the same thing. I mean - God is infinite, omnipresent, etc - right?
Science is not the act of disproving God's existence, it's just trying to explain how things work.
Oh... and it is ridiculous comparing a nuclear explosion to the creation of a watch - c'mon.
why do creationists keep confusing the theory of evolution with abiogenesis. The theory of evolution has no dealing whatsoever with the beginning of life, but how forms of life evolve into other forms. Abiogenesis is the event which forms life from non-organic matter.
Ah, yes - A creationist talking about science when they have no CLUE what science is.
Big Bang is the EXPANSION of space/time. NOT an explosion and NOT space AND time... It's... EXPANSION of Space/Time.
They just can never seem to get that.
And yes, according to Einstein, Sagan, and Hawking, space/time can expand at a speed greater than the speed of light. What violates the laws of physics is anything traveling THROUGH space/time faster than speed of light.
um are there two big bang theories cause I dont recognise the one she describes. 8|
the theory of evolution is not cosmology. its not steller nucleosynthesis or abiogenesis either.
hawking or bowden gee thats a hard one to decide... since the big bang wasnt an explosion as such. Didnt Bowden suggest nostril ignition as the source of fire breathing dinosaurs ?
Bumba the african vomit god created everything, all Hail Bumba !
Pantheists have been proven to be smarter than atheists and theists. The champions of Big Bang Creationism have been proven as frauds time and time again.
There are some bold statements that are not 'explained' in this video. The Creationist version of momentum conservation isn't explained outside of 'God did it'. That the naturalistic model of the Solar system should be more 'homogenous'; with a '1%' similarity means 'intelligently' designed? Where do they come up with these stats or terms? What is 'orbital' hydrogen? It would sound very impressive; if you've never read an astronomy textbook... Empty your garage and a car will appear, if I pray?
@xchris1800 but black holes dont exist, quantum theory is BOGUS, evolution is just a lump of crap, the sun really is shrinking. all of science is just so not logical... the truth is the earth is the center of the universe, god created us from nothing and well dont ever ask what created god.
@xchris1800 for example using your logic a black hole curves spacetime infinitely, in general relativity mass curves spacetime, so if it is curved infinitely that means there must be an infinite amount of mass, but a black came from a star with a finite amount of mass. how can something with a finite "spacetime curvature" become something with an infinite "spacetime curvature"? N = (infinite)? using your bogus math and bogus logic it will never work but with sophisticated math it works just fine
@xchris1800 logic cant solve everything, and no one ever said it could. Euclid's Elements was completely based on logic and yet his parallel postulate was wrong. lots of problems in physics cant be solved by logic, many theories in quantum physics will make your head explode if you try to use logic, Richard Feynman is famous for saying "shut up and compute." only unevolved brains try to use pure logic to solve problems while more evolved and well smart people use mathematics.
evolution ALONE doesnt make sense what started that event something had to start it...the idea is very possible but this still doesnt answer the real question what started us!
Who in the fuck said the big bang was an explosion???? It was an expansion. Where did the energy come from??? Where does the time from tomorrow come from??? Some things are just so damn confusing hahahah
know at least, that it mass/energy, time, space reality. That's why they get weird concept of nothing, when they cannot deal with a model without these elements.
Other problem for atheist is that they dont pay attention to this interesting equation
N = 0*(infinite)
where N is any number. This equation has much to tell us. We must accept by faith that God created the World from nothing, it exceeds our limited mind, atheist on the other hand are far for give a reasonable (3)
So, you think the universe cannot come from nothing, but God can create it from nothing? Science has no particular certainty on how the universe has come to be. We know it expanded in an event called the Big Bang, but we dont know where it came from. It might have always been there or it could be the rests of another collapsed universe. For one thing it is impossible for us to know the physics outside the universe...
Note: you dont need to have phd(s) to get this conclusion, just use your brain. There are fools walking with phd, it doesnt mean they are right.
Now I discovered that nothing for God-haters is not nothing, but the 70% of the mass of the universe. Others says it's just emptiness, but even emptiness if exists is subordinated to the rules of physics, forgetting or not accepting that nothingness implies the absence of everything we (2)
@xchris1800 It's not known whether the universe had a beginning. The Big Bang theory only describes the development of our universe in its early stages, not an absolute beginning. Whatever form the universe had before the Big Bang is unknown; it may very well be beginningless.
Current research in cosmology suggests that the universe's total energy may be zero. Thus, your supposed "absurd" equation (0 = 0 + 1) is a misrepresentation. The equation should, instead, look like this: 1 + -1 = 0.
@TehDako "The equation should, instead, look like this: 1 + -1 = 0."
1 is everything, 0 is nothing, so you mean that everything collided with everything with the opossite charge and the result is nothing.
first, everything is all that really exist in absolute concept, it is not positive nor negative, the equation is just to show the absurdity of getting something from nothing, to visualize this, think in an universal group which contains in it only one group,
@TehDako and that group contains all the elements in the universal group. Now the empty group comes to be an abstraction, because it has nothing. God is 1, we are that zero.
This has nothing to do with anti-matter, but with absolute existence, and relative existence.
produced the first living being, even worst, the universe came into existence from nothing, by itsef, they "think", everything evolves, it's just matter of time, chance, energy, and the elements in place, no intelligence is allowed.
Monkey believes in such foolishness, but not humans.
Now I know: Every "evolutionists" come from monkeys, but they are not humans. When you speak with an "evolutionist", dont be fooled, he is not a human, what you have in front is a monkey (c2)
@xchris1800 ; Your 6th grade education is showing. So, you are the descendant of a clump of mud. You are the descendant of incest, twice over.Congratulaions. Creation in Genesis, is so childish, so dumb, that even YOUR OWN CHRISTIAN colleges do not teach litteral biblical creation.
Now I understand why "evolutionists" say that they come from apes, what they dont know is that they seem to be humans but they are not.
Here is the proof:
When we want to do something, we have to plan, and even planning we have un-expected problems to face on the way, we have to think more than expected, and make more effort that expected, and take more time than expected, finally, the work is done, as expected.
But this "human-monkeys", believe that abiogenesis (c1)
they have a problem with the big bang coming from 'nothing' but their god essentially came from 'nothing'... it's really hard for me to grasp their analogy..
It's awfully revealing that the primary defense of Evolutionists against Creationists is name calling and crying foul when their own beliefs are pointed out to them.
Sorry fellas, vulgar little ditties and childish insults are hardly an adequate rebuttal in ANY debate. When was the last time you saw a Creationist insulting the intelligence of Evolutionists and engaging in ad-hominem attacks?
@confoundtheidols The biggest problem with the argument in favour of creationism is that there is NO PROOF to support it; NONE. The creationist's argument relies on the bible; a ridiculous work of fiction constructed in the form of a circular argument that is supposed to justify itself. I say that any book that makes extraordinary claims to revealed wisdom requires extraordinary proof. End of story. I'll rely on proof over a talking snake in an apple tree any day thanks.
@Dennycrane757 do you think it was literally a talking snake that deceived Eve and sin came from Eve literally eating an apple from a tree? Do you not understand the intricate metaphors in the book of Genesis alone!?
@PoloBoyPrince I think I've got a pretty good idea about metaphors thanks. The problem is that there are plenty of nut jobs in the religious right that don't , hence the ridiculous attempt to get pseudoscience taught in schools as a supposed alternative theory to science.
@PoloBoyPrince And to further answer your question, I don't believe that ANYTHING in the bible is true. Metaphors or not, the bible is a terrible example to refer to if you're looking for examples of good ethical practice. It's laden with hypocrisy, misogyny, bigotry, hatred and ignorance. Since the day man invented God, religion has done nothing but retard progress, free thinking and human endeavor. Science flies men to the moon; religion just flies men into buildings.
@confoundtheidols What else can one do. It doesn't do any good to cite references, refer them to appropriate scientific journals, or even do the calculations for them. Creationist don't comprehend logic, reason, evidence, peer review, scientific principles, and even basic mathematics. It's just easier to believe with NO evidence in man poofing from dirt, woman being cloned from a rib, a talking snake, a man surviving in the belly of a fish for 3 days, a world wide flood, virgin birth, etc.
@confoundtheidols There is NO debate. The instant a creationist with a credible background can put up his "research" for scientific peer review and not rely on"god did it's" because he can't figure out why his argument would otherwise fail, then maybe they will be taken seriously. Instead, scientifically illiterate creationist "scientists" put out fucking retarded videos like this for other scientifically illiterate brainwashed creationist idiots.
@jknengr796 When the retarded call retarded to the intelligent is understandable, but when the intelligent call retarded to the retarded, he just speak the truth, evolution is a false religion, created for retarded dreamers, by retarded God-haters.
@xchris1800 When someone thinks or has been brainwashed to think that "evolution" or science in general is a "religion", they have a serious intellect problem. It usually comes down to a complete lack of any pertinent education, willful scientific ignorance and a complete immersion into a particular fundamentalist religious cult by having been told what to do and think.
@jknengr796 " When someone thinks or has been brainwashed to think that "evolution" or science in general is a "religion", they have a serious intellect problem".
Ok, let's start by using logic, and let see who has serious intellectual problem. I dont care the explanation of "evolution" but its core, that is abiogenesis is truth, and the universe always existed or it came from nothing by itself, because everything evolve, these are ancient pagan mithological beliefs, that you may (c1)
@xchris1800 Dumb kid. Abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution. You don`t even know the definition of the sciences. Where do you think Christianity came from. It is based on the myths of older religions.
@tallliza Now the ignorance get dressed as a person with "education", education is not to have a degree, it is to understand the reality, and that is open to everyone, who hates fantasies, I laught at ignorants with degree. God exists, I recognize that you dont know him, and that is foolishness what I say to you,because you cannot understand, but I understand your position, your problem that you perhaps admit inside you, but never will declare it, it is your proud,(1)
@xchris1800 Go back to school , and learn to write a decent sentence is English, It will improve your credibility. You come here to discuss evolution ,and you don`t even seem to know the definition.
@tallliza I see you are afraid, you are right, English is not my language. you said "How the universe came from nothing? Only the bible teaches that something comes from nothing, NOT science"
Then the universe came from something, can you explain that something? I mean, is time, mass, and space applicable to that something?
And please dont be ignorant, SCIENCE says the universe came from nothing, but I will follow your logic, not what science says, the debate is between you and I.
@xchris1800 Only religion claims to know with 100%certainty how it all happened, without showing any evidence as to the HOW, WHY and WHEN of creation. Science presents the best hypothesis available,(the Big Bang) ,without claiming with 100 % certainty that that is how it happened. Science NEVER taught that something comes from nothing. Only religion teaches ,god created the universe OUT OF NOTHING. Learn at least the basics before starting a discussion.
Ignorance 1:" Science NEVER taught that something comes from nothing,Only religion teaches" Go to you tube: "'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009", how can I debate with you, if you dont know your religion?
Now I know you dont understand the "big bang" theory. Great "educated" you happend to be.
That's why you were not consistent with my question "Then the universe came from something, can you explain that something?".(1)
@xchris1800 I dare you to prove anything wrong with what I claimed. Silly kid. A universe from Nothing" by Lawrence Krauss ? That` is just another Hypothesis. Where does he say with 100 % certainty," The universe came from nothing ? Stupid kid. There are many books written about the start of the cosmos. You can`t even seem to make a distinction between an hypothesis,and absolute certainty.
@xchris1800 ; Learn the definition of "religion", kid, before you start talking about it. It`s hard to have a meaningful discussion with people still living in the Stone-Age. Good luck with your fantasy. One day reality will knock at the door. Something to ponder.. One of the last prayers of Mother Theresa... God, IF YOU EXIST, have mercy on me. Think !!!
@tallliza that makes you hold what you want to believe for true, but it is your proud, not the logic, reasoning, common sense which are with you, your proud make you fool. Start with something that you want about origins, which you feel strong, you have nothing, you will see your reasoning is like water which you cannot hold it among your fingers, obviously a CREATOR is the reasonable conclusion for a healthy mind.
But be happy many people will believe in fantasies, becasue they (2)
@xchris1800 Your comment is evidence you have no education. An argument from ignorance. Don't bother. It would be like explaining Calculus or Differential Equations to my cat.
@xchris1800 How the universe came from nothing? Only the bible teaches that something comes from nothing, NOT science. What did your creator use to create the universe ? NOTHING, but you never question that, do you ?
@tallliza dont like the truth, so i am not here to win people to my side, just to show how fool you are in your dreams, that's all my purpose. Let'see who is more "educated" in terms of reality, and common sense.
@xchris1800 Then give me ONE reasonable answer why YOUR OWN CHRISTIAN COLLEGES do not teach litteral biblical creation. From the 106 colleges that form the " Christian Coalition of Colleges " only 5 teach the creation story as described in Genesis.
@FaceMrCare unicorns are rhinos if you look at the first printing of the webster dictionary it says it right there its just that the meaning of the word changed over time
If you truly believe in Creationism, please take 3 minutes and watch my 'In order to believe in Biblical Creationism' video. If you can still be a Creationist after that, please take the time and explain to me HOW
This video is PROOF that Creationists are seriously intellectually challenged. These people have a complete and total lack of understanding of scientific principles. They have a complete willful ignorance of the sciences. They have a total disregard for physical evidence and logical problem solving ability.
This is so stupid it hurts!! If any sunday school is playing this for their 5th graders, those parents need to be charged with child abuse.
it's not something coming from nothing. it's the expanding of the singularity which held all time,matter, and space. it's not a big bang just a great expansion.
What a load of ignorant bullshit! Science has NEVER said that something comes from nothing. Not once. What science has said is that approximately 70% of the measurable energy in the known universe is known to exist in the space BETWEEN celestial objects; eg: planets, moons etc. When science says this, they are talking about quantum physics. These people are so ignorant that the thrust of their argument is that because science doesn't have all the answers, then the flying spaghetti monster did.
The Big Bang Theory IS that nothing exploded and created everything. In so many words. You'd probably balk at the idea that Evolution also teaches that life evolved from rocks over billions of years. And yet that is what Evolution teaches. Oh yes, and life came from those rocks after they absorbed the nonexistent oxygen that was in the atmosphere...
@confoundtheidols The big bang theory says nothing of the sort. The statement about "something coming from nothing" is just a bunch of bullshit spouted by religious idiots who have just over-simplified what science has said. What science has said is this: They don't know exactly what happened. But they do know the type of event that it had to be. This statement actually speaks to the strength of science rather than it's weakness. Science has never said that life evolved directly from rocks.
Order can come out of chaos! And example is a flock of starlings. It's chaos when you look at it, there's no leader and yet they all fly in the same direction and change direction together.
These people are so retarded, it's hilarious. They completely misunderstand the theory. They misunderstand the difference between biology and physics. They misunderstand basic scientific concepts. They quote mine Hawking. They make ridiculous over bearing analogies. They are devoid of simple logic and knowledge. They need to seek a primary school education...
oh, well if the bible says so, then that must be true. I stone whores and execute homo's too because its in the bible and we all know the bible is true
@bdhcarbon Hey ,how it going .That in the Law of Moses In the Gospels when the crowd was about to stone the cheating woman .The brought her to Jesus and he said ""He who is without sin cast the first stone " .My question to you is should we apply his to are life ?
@bdhcarbon@bdhcarbon Hey ,how it going .That in the Law of Moses In the Gospels when the crowd was about to stone the cheating woman .The brought her to Jesus and he said ""He who is without sin cast the first stone " .My question to you is should we apply this to are life ?
if you leave your garage for 10,000 years , you won't see a car but will see lot of changes such as algae or stones or the garage maybe would just disappear.
@skatercez How many recorded virgin births have there been in the history of man?
Ah. None. 0. Less than 1. There are however many many virgin births through out human religions. You could say they are rife with the idea. Christianity certainly wasn't the first to think it would make a good embellishment to a set of stories about morality and control. But simply writing a story makes it no more true than painting a picture. A representation of reality through the filter of a human conciousness.
@iFrannkie geocentricism is killing creationist because all creationist seem to be able to do is criticize scientist about faulty theories meanwhile the bible states that the sun revolves around the earth.
Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and Chronicles 16:30 state that "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." Psalm 104:5 says, "[the LORD] set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that "the sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises."
Quoting Hawkins is weird, since he didnt believe in a god. he said it was unnecesary because the universe can infact create itself but we cant prove that there is no creator however he is not nessecary.
And the problem with a creator is that he has to be created too.
And this one has because of the factors that are required are in place.
So saying that it is an argument against evolution that earth has just the right factors is retarded since there wouldnt be life unless we had these factors.
The ignorance of these people is so,,,,,, i dont have words for it,
The car experiment is retarded,
Since it would work , but it could take billions of billions of years and its more likely that someting else evolves
And how the hell can this woman not realise that if god is the creator who the hell created god, a complex being like god cant possibly be spawned into existence, he had to evolve.
The universe began with simplicity.
And the argument that a sinlge change on the earh would make life impossible is retarded, the sole reason why we have life is because of the factors that require life is in place here.
@jonray305 Much more fun exposing creationists for the retarded idiots that they are. If only they knew how stupid they are.They need people like myself to remind of their mental shortcomings.
These idiots just don't understand the big bang theory at all. Its kind of amusing how they think everything popped into existence with a help from the divine creator. They don't understand that the Universe wasn't what it is today. It was more of a big expansion. And there was only a few elements in place and it would have been only very hot gases. And Stephen Hawking has recently stated. "there is no need for a creator in the Universe."
@rationalanarchy "Organic molecules have been around since the cooling and fusing period post Big-Bang..."
That is total speculation and conjecture. There was no one around to document it therefore it is nothing more than an hypothesis. Until a time machine is invented no one can go back and see what happened 10 years ago, let alone 10 billion (assuming the universe and physical space existed back then for a time machine to even go back to).
@seijeff Until a time machine is invented no one can go back and see what happened 10 years ago, let alone 10 billion (assuming the universe and physical space existed back then for a time machine to even go back to)."
Ever hear of evidence? Just because we cannot revisit the scene of a crime as it takes place doesn't mean that there isn't evidence that it didn't happen.
Actually no, NO-ONE with even a rudimentary knowledge of science would call the big bang an "explosion", most ten year olds could correct you on that annoying plastic-faced woman. I can't believe people are un-educated enough to buy this turd.
Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and Chronicles 16:30 state that "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." Psalm 104:5 says, "[the LORD] set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that "the sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises." thats what stephen hawking says and that is what is killing creationist to this very day.
@rationalanarchy OK, since you refuse to answer my simple questions about 'where did water' come from, and 'where did planets' originate from, and you didn't answer my question to whether it is logical to believe a super-natural being, may have caused the entire universe and everything in it into existence....so my new question is where did organic macromolecules originate from??? If I'm going to stop believing in God, then I need indisputable proof and evidence to convince me otherwise.
@rationalanarchy The DNA molecule is gentically stored digital information, stored in 3 dimensions, with over lapping and embedded sequences which conforms to linguistics laws.The number of nucleotides,ACTG's, are regulated not only in the sequences, but the entire molecule from one end to the other conforms to linguistic laws.The amount of information stored up in a strand of DNA is dumbfounding, and nature has no power to cause something, this complex or even information itself, into existence
@rationalanarchy Yes, I know that life didn't 'come' from rocks, according to evolutionist, but they originated from them. Just think, where did this Earth and everything in it come from. I've heard atheist who believe space-rocks are the originaters of Earth and life, but how is this possible and where's the proof. Where did water come from, comets? Where did plants and life originate from, rocks/nothing? Isn't it logical to believe a super-natural being caused these things into existence?
@rationalanarchy When I brought up Windows Vista I was comparising its complexity with the complexity you need for life. If a computer couldn't of evolved over billions of years do to random chance, what makes you think life, which is far more complex, could have evolved do to random chance. Also, a computer consist of codes such as 101011101, while our DNA consist of a code aswell like ACTGTGAC. So my question is, how could this code that makes up who we are, come by random chance and nonliving
@rationalanarchy What are you talking about? Who told you that lie, and why did you believe it? Have you never studied the intricate complexity of the cell, are you not aware of how unimaginably complex the DNA molecule is. It is logically and scientifically impossible for these things to have come by random chance, especially from non-living material(Rocks). That's like saying Windows Vista, evolved from rocks over billions of years, yet 'Life' is far more intricate & complex than Windows Vista
Evolution is the biggest lie and conspiracy of all times. More and more scientists are converting to creationism because they realize the stupidity of evolution. Stupid lies = evolution.
@Hsojaml you realize your comment is stupid wright? you just cant say that evolution is lies. you cant disprove atheists muslims jews etc. dont be closed minded idiot next time okay.(:
ummmmmmmmmmm evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. how the fuck do you plan on debating 99% of the scientific community that supports it?
@BillKiernan Wow, you have no clue what you are talking about and it is obvious that you get your information from retarded christians who have no eucation. Your whole idea is that there is this imaginary space wizard who makes stuff from NOTHING. The Big Bang Theory never states that there was nothing then it blew up you retarded liar. Typical christan, has to lie to try to ake a point that you always fail to make.
@db10001110101 *AHEM* calm down, take a breather. i'm an atheist, and when i say "these people are fucking retards" i'm talking about fundamentalist christians. i understand your mistake though, i see red easily and have mixed up peoples posts like you have in the past.
@BillKiernan Sorry man. I had all my wisdom teeth pulled yesturday and was all doped up. If I had been in the right state of mind I would have noticed.
@db10001110101 haha, no problem. like i said, this type of shit puts me on the warpath too and sometimes there's collateral damage and i mistake what people are saying as well
After watching this video, I feel disappointed and kind of happy at the same time. Disappointed because these people willingly spread disinformation and mislead people without much knowledge in the scientific area, and happy to know that these kind of strawman arguments don't affect me anymore. I'm happy because after a long process from being religious to being atheist, I have matures intellectually, and I know some of the real answers that many Christians don't believe. It's a good feeling. :)
Woah, I've never seen anyone quote-mine Stephen Hawking. In his series "Into The Universe", he makes it pretty clear that he's an atheist. I don't know the original context of the quote that was stated here, but he definitely does not believe in any kind of intelligent creator.
Can a rolex watch be formed from a bomb exploding? No therefore an all powerful being created earth in 3 days then day and night, then plants, then the sun, then the rest of the some odd billions of galaxies in the universe in a day.
I don't see why we can't teach our kids this in school.
madmiguelh2o 1 week ago
Evolutionists don't talk about the big bang because it has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is simply the observation of life changing over time which is proven by the facts that you people choose to pretend do not exist.
madmiguelh2o 1 week ago
You need to 1. Stop making scarecrow arguments. 2. Wake up! Creationism is certainly not a theory, it doesn't qualify as a hypotheses, in fact it isn't even a coherent idea.
kyekire 1 month ago
at 0:50. Nobody is saying the universe came into being by an explosion dumb bitch. Only creatards like you claim that scientists claim that.
The big bang was not an explosion. It was a rapid expansion of time and space.
But seeing as that's a rather lenghty description for a headline in a paper. Someone started calling it big bang, and the name stuck.
thedutchman01 1 month ago
"So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator."
Hmm I wonder why they excluded the next sentence?
"But if the universe is really completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?"
Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time
aakesson1 2 months ago
I think it's funny that people refuse to consider that the energy that begot the Big Bang and God aren't the same thing. I mean - God is infinite, omnipresent, etc - right?
Science is not the act of disproving God's existence, it's just trying to explain how things work.
Oh... and it is ridiculous comparing a nuclear explosion to the creation of a watch - c'mon.
GregJoshuaW 2 months ago
@GregJoshuaW I agree:D
princess17257 1 month ago
why do creationists keep confusing the theory of evolution with abiogenesis. The theory of evolution has no dealing whatsoever with the beginning of life, but how forms of life evolve into other forms. Abiogenesis is the event which forms life from non-organic matter.
thegreatdefender1 2 months ago
so let me get this str8...1st the sun was spinning around the earth...now its the opposite...
1st there wasnt any lightning , it was the fury of god...now that is explained...its just lightning
so in the WHOLE known history...where science couldnt explain...IT WAS GOD...
1st the ATOM was only a theory...now we can even divide an ATOM
maybe evolution is not right but...if this is god's BEST JOB...im not impressed
i cant belive in something who MESSED UP almost EVERYTHING
him80us 2 months ago
An "Explosion"???
Ah, yes - A creationist talking about science when they have no CLUE what science is.
Big Bang is the EXPANSION of space/time. NOT an explosion and NOT space AND time... It's... EXPANSION of Space/Time.
They just can never seem to get that.
And yes, according to Einstein, Sagan, and Hawking, space/time can expand at a speed greater than the speed of light. What violates the laws of physics is anything traveling THROUGH space/time faster than speed of light.
Equality72521sr 3 months ago
Comment removed
DJJulieO 3 months ago
@DJJulieO
Please re-read what you just said... THEN, get back to us!
Equality72521sr 3 months ago
The entire basis for creationism is "I don't know, therefore God. Oh, and I didn't do an ounce of research."
rexer888 3 months ago
Some of the arguments in this video are so comedic that if someone told me it was a parody I'd believe them.
joeyt5000 3 months ago
Real science stories get %97 likes where your videos are shy to show dislikes. Haha, what a waste of time.
noonelovestotalk 3 months ago
um are there two big bang theories cause I dont recognise the one she describes. 8|
the theory of evolution is not cosmology. its not steller nucleosynthesis or abiogenesis either.
hawking or bowden gee thats a hard one to decide... since the big bang wasnt an explosion as such. Didnt Bowden suggest nostril ignition as the source of fire breathing dinosaurs ?
Bumba the african vomit god created everything, all Hail Bumba !
well, no. the Theory of Evolution is biology
SqueakerAlpha 4 months ago
I hate it when the friggin music is LOUDER than the person speaking waste of time.
TheChrissy48 4 months ago
evolution.... its not evolution stupid women its called physics CREATIONISTS NEEDS TO BE RIDICULED everytime they show up
AdrianDeMoxica23 5 months ago
ID-iots don't know the difference between Evolution and the Big Bang.
gregrutz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The big bang is not the theory of evolution.....
scarletharlot69 5 months ago
One example of one explosion producing order: stars producing the chemical elements.
fiesta181 5 months ago 5
@fiesta181 so you're saying stars come before elements?
1cor14vs1 4 months ago
@1cor14vs1 Yes.
All elements except hydrogen. Big H is the 'raw material' out of which all the other elements are formed - that's how the theory goes.
fiesta181 4 months ago
Comment removed
1cor14vs1 4 months ago
Pantheists have been proven to be smarter than atheists and theists. The champions of Big Bang Creationism have been proven as frauds time and time again.
orrerystar 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a question: You don't believe in the big bang?
KevinVang1000 5 months ago
Most creationist videos block being able to like or dislike them... Atheism for the win.
aqouby 6 months ago 8
Thanks God to make more intelligent to those who love you, and more foolish to those who hate you. God the Creator to HIM the honor.
xchris1800 7 months ago
There are some bold statements that are not 'explained' in this video. The Creationist version of momentum conservation isn't explained outside of 'God did it'. That the naturalistic model of the Solar system should be more 'homogenous'; with a '1%' similarity means 'intelligently' designed? Where do they come up with these stats or terms? What is 'orbital' hydrogen? It would sound very impressive; if you've never read an astronomy textbook... Empty your garage and a car will appear, if I pray?
granddad2002 7 months ago
scientist cant help creationist, why? cause there is no cure for stupidity!
skatercez 7 months ago
@xchris1800 but black holes dont exist, quantum theory is BOGUS, evolution is just a lump of crap, the sun really is shrinking. all of science is just so not logical... the truth is the earth is the center of the universe, god created us from nothing and well dont ever ask what created god.
skatercez 7 months ago
@skatercez tou will ask him when you meet him... scoffer..
MADbokowsky 4 months ago
@skatercez
you will ask him when you meet him... scoffer..
MADbokowsky 4 months ago
@xchris1800 for example using your logic a black hole curves spacetime infinitely, in general relativity mass curves spacetime, so if it is curved infinitely that means there must be an infinite amount of mass, but a black came from a star with a finite amount of mass. how can something with a finite "spacetime curvature" become something with an infinite "spacetime curvature"? N = (infinite)? using your bogus math and bogus logic it will never work but with sophisticated math it works just fine
skatercez 7 months ago
@xchris1800 logic cant solve everything, and no one ever said it could. Euclid's Elements was completely based on logic and yet his parallel postulate was wrong. lots of problems in physics cant be solved by logic, many theories in quantum physics will make your head explode if you try to use logic, Richard Feynman is famous for saying "shut up and compute." only unevolved brains try to use pure logic to solve problems while more evolved and well smart people use mathematics.
skatercez 7 months ago
Don't you guys want to talk about who formulated the Big Bang?
Stitchman3875 8 months ago
This is genius.
DarthHater100 8 months ago
@DarthHater100 Darhthater100 is shockofgod .
alltiedup217 8 months ago
evolution ALONE doesnt make sense what started that event something had to start it...the idea is very possible but this still doesnt answer the real question what started us!
bloodyxscar 8 months ago
stop quote mining real scientists
shnibly12 8 months ago
Who in the fuck said the big bang was an explosion???? It was an expansion. Where did the energy come from??? Where does the time from tomorrow come from??? Some things are just so damn confusing hahahah
brasil91768 8 months ago
answer, everything they touch they spoil it. little example is: a) Nothing is not nothing b) Abiogenesis is true, the law of biogenesis is not a law.
I dont laught at atheist, I feel sorry for them.
xchris1800 9 months ago
know at least, that it mass/energy, time, space reality. That's why they get weird concept of nothing, when they cannot deal with a model without these elements.
Other problem for atheist is that they dont pay attention to this interesting equation
N = 0*(infinite)
where N is any number. This equation has much to tell us. We must accept by faith that God created the World from nothing, it exceeds our limited mind, atheist on the other hand are far for give a reasonable (3)
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800
So, you think the universe cannot come from nothing, but God can create it from nothing? Science has no particular certainty on how the universe has come to be. We know it expanded in an event called the Big Bang, but we dont know where it came from. It might have always been there or it could be the rests of another collapsed universe. For one thing it is impossible for us to know the physics outside the universe...
SaunaFinland 8 months ago
@xchris1800 That's not an equation, if you want to be precise.
595o 8 months ago
The universe is the absence? of that SOMETHING.
Note: you dont need to have phd(s) to get this conclusion, just use your brain. There are fools walking with phd, it doesnt mean they are right.
Now I discovered that nothing for God-haters is not nothing, but the 70% of the mass of the universe. Others says it's just emptiness, but even emptiness if exists is subordinated to the rules of physics, forgetting or not accepting that nothingness implies the absence of everything we (2)
xchris1800 9 months ago
IF THE UNIVERSE HAD A BEGINNING, GOD EXISTS, AS SIMPLE AS THAT.
Nothing, is the absence of everything.
0 = 0 + 1. Absurd. Nothing cannot produce everything, otherwise it would not be nothing.
1 = 1 + 0. Logical. Everything is the only that may produce nothing, and it remains being everything.
then:
If nothing cannot produce the universe which is everything before nothing.
Then SOMETHING which is everything produce the universe WHICH IS nothing before it. (1)
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800 It's not known whether the universe had a beginning. The Big Bang theory only describes the development of our universe in its early stages, not an absolute beginning. Whatever form the universe had before the Big Bang is unknown; it may very well be beginningless.
Current research in cosmology suggests that the universe's total energy may be zero. Thus, your supposed "absurd" equation (0 = 0 + 1) is a misrepresentation. The equation should, instead, look like this: 1 + -1 = 0.
TehDako 8 months ago
@TehDako "The equation should, instead, look like this: 1 + -1 = 0."
1 is everything, 0 is nothing, so you mean that everything collided with everything with the opossite charge and the result is nothing.
first, everything is all that really exist in absolute concept, it is not positive nor negative, the equation is just to show the absurdity of getting something from nothing, to visualize this, think in an universal group which contains in it only one group,
xchris1800 8 months ago
@TehDako and that group contains all the elements in the universal group. Now the empty group comes to be an abstraction, because it has nothing. God is 1, we are that zero.
This has nothing to do with anti-matter, but with absolute existence, and relative existence.
xchris1800 8 months ago
THEY USE THE ATHEIST STEVEN HAWKING TO JUSTIFY CREATION????
MrKevin624 9 months ago
that disguise itself as a human. (c3)
xchris1800 10 months ago
produced the first living being, even worst, the universe came into existence from nothing, by itsef, they "think", everything evolves, it's just matter of time, chance, energy, and the elements in place, no intelligence is allowed.
Monkey believes in such foolishness, but not humans.
Now I know: Every "evolutionists" come from monkeys, but they are not humans. When you speak with an "evolutionist", dont be fooled, he is not a human, what you have in front is a monkey (c2)
xchris1800 10 months ago
@xchris1800 ; Your 6th grade education is showing. So, you are the descendant of a clump of mud. You are the descendant of incest, twice over.Congratulaions. Creation in Genesis, is so childish, so dumb, that even YOUR OWN CHRISTIAN colleges do not teach litteral biblical creation.
tallliza 9 months ago
Now I understand why "evolutionists" say that they come from apes, what they dont know is that they seem to be humans but they are not.
Here is the proof:
When we want to do something, we have to plan, and even planning we have un-expected problems to face on the way, we have to think more than expected, and make more effort that expected, and take more time than expected, finally, the work is done, as expected.
But this "human-monkeys", believe that abiogenesis (c1)
xchris1800 10 months ago
@xchris1800 Go back to school kid and get your certificate from kindergarten. Thank you. And come back, when you got an education.
tallliza 9 months ago
big bang false......God created the earth true
BramWinB 10 months ago
they have a problem with the big bang coming from 'nothing' but their god essentially came from 'nothing'... it's really hard for me to grasp their analogy..
Georgiadogs4life 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The big bang theory is probably accurate: In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. BANG!
GeekingForJesus 10 months ago
Wow, This lady knows more than scientists who spend their whole life studing the subject. Let's pray to her, she's a goddess !!
gregrutz 10 months ago
Evolution = Cosmology. All those universities better change all their departments as they obviously have it wrong.
mik99D 11 months ago
Hahaha...christians accusing others of having blind faith...classic.
TwistedPoliticians 11 months ago
It's awfully revealing that the primary defense of Evolutionists against Creationists is name calling and crying foul when their own beliefs are pointed out to them.
Sorry fellas, vulgar little ditties and childish insults are hardly an adequate rebuttal in ANY debate. When was the last time you saw a Creationist insulting the intelligence of Evolutionists and engaging in ad-hominem attacks?
confoundtheidols 1 year ago
@confoundtheidols The biggest problem with the argument in favour of creationism is that there is NO PROOF to support it; NONE. The creationist's argument relies on the bible; a ridiculous work of fiction constructed in the form of a circular argument that is supposed to justify itself. I say that any book that makes extraordinary claims to revealed wisdom requires extraordinary proof. End of story. I'll rely on proof over a talking snake in an apple tree any day thanks.
Dennycrane757 1 year ago
@Dennycrane757 do you think it was literally a talking snake that deceived Eve and sin came from Eve literally eating an apple from a tree? Do you not understand the intricate metaphors in the book of Genesis alone!?
PoloBoyPrince 11 months ago
@PoloBoyPrince I think I've got a pretty good idea about metaphors thanks. The problem is that there are plenty of nut jobs in the religious right that don't , hence the ridiculous attempt to get pseudoscience taught in schools as a supposed alternative theory to science.
Dennycrane757 11 months ago
@PoloBoyPrince And to further answer your question, I don't believe that ANYTHING in the bible is true. Metaphors or not, the bible is a terrible example to refer to if you're looking for examples of good ethical practice. It's laden with hypocrisy, misogyny, bigotry, hatred and ignorance. Since the day man invented God, religion has done nothing but retard progress, free thinking and human endeavor. Science flies men to the moon; religion just flies men into buildings.
Dennycrane757 11 months ago
@PoloBoyPrince Saying the earth is a 'circle' is not a metaphor, it shows the men who wrote the bible were wrong.
gregrutz 10 months ago
@confoundtheidols What else can one do. It doesn't do any good to cite references, refer them to appropriate scientific journals, or even do the calculations for them. Creationist don't comprehend logic, reason, evidence, peer review, scientific principles, and even basic mathematics. It's just easier to believe with NO evidence in man poofing from dirt, woman being cloned from a rib, a talking snake, a man surviving in the belly of a fish for 3 days, a world wide flood, virgin birth, etc.
jknengr796 1 year ago
@confoundtheidols There is NO debate. The instant a creationist with a credible background can put up his "research" for scientific peer review and not rely on"god did it's" because he can't figure out why his argument would otherwise fail, then maybe they will be taken seriously. Instead, scientifically illiterate creationist "scientists" put out fucking retarded videos like this for other scientifically illiterate brainwashed creationist idiots.
This video is about as retarded as they get.
jknengr796 1 year ago 14
@jknengr796 When the retarded call retarded to the intelligent is understandable, but when the intelligent call retarded to the retarded, he just speak the truth, evolution is a false religion, created for retarded dreamers, by retarded God-haters.
xchris1800 10 months ago
@xchris1800 When someone thinks or has been brainwashed to think that "evolution" or science in general is a "religion", they have a serious intellect problem. It usually comes down to a complete lack of any pertinent education, willful scientific ignorance and a complete immersion into a particular fundamentalist religious cult by having been told what to do and think.
jknengr796 10 months ago
@jknengr796 " When someone thinks or has been brainwashed to think that "evolution" or science in general is a "religion", they have a serious intellect problem".
Ok, let's start by using logic, and let see who has serious intellectual problem. I dont care the explanation of "evolution" but its core, that is abiogenesis is truth, and the universe always existed or it came from nothing by itself, because everything evolve, these are ancient pagan mithological beliefs, that you may (c1)
xchris1800 10 months ago
@xchris1800 Dumb kid. Abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution. You don`t even know the definition of the sciences. Where do you think Christianity came from. It is based on the myths of older religions.
tallliza 9 months ago
@tallliza Now the ignorance get dressed as a person with "education", education is not to have a degree, it is to understand the reality, and that is open to everyone, who hates fantasies, I laught at ignorants with degree. God exists, I recognize that you dont know him, and that is foolishness what I say to you,because you cannot understand, but I understand your position, your problem that you perhaps admit inside you, but never will declare it, it is your proud,(1)
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800 Go back to school , and learn to write a decent sentence is English, It will improve your credibility. You come here to discuss evolution ,and you don`t even seem to know the definition.
tallliza 9 months ago
@tallliza I see you are afraid, you are right, English is not my language. you said "How the universe came from nothing? Only the bible teaches that something comes from nothing, NOT science"
Then the universe came from something, can you explain that something? I mean, is time, mass, and space applicable to that something?
And please dont be ignorant, SCIENCE says the universe came from nothing, but I will follow your logic, not what science says, the debate is between you and I.
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800 Only religion claims to know with 100%certainty how it all happened, without showing any evidence as to the HOW, WHY and WHEN of creation. Science presents the best hypothesis available,(the Big Bang) ,without claiming with 100 % certainty that that is how it happened. Science NEVER taught that something comes from nothing. Only religion teaches ,god created the universe OUT OF NOTHING. Learn at least the basics before starting a discussion.
tallliza 9 months ago
@tallliza About your own religion:
Ignorance 1:" Science NEVER taught that something comes from nothing,Only religion teaches" Go to you tube: "'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009", how can I debate with you, if you dont know your religion?
Now I know you dont understand the "big bang" theory. Great "educated" you happend to be.
That's why you were not consistent with my question "Then the universe came from something, can you explain that something?".(1)
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800 I dare you to prove anything wrong with what I claimed. Silly kid. A universe from Nothing" by Lawrence Krauss ? That` is just another Hypothesis. Where does he say with 100 % certainty," The universe came from nothing ? Stupid kid. There are many books written about the start of the cosmos. You can`t even seem to make a distinction between an hypothesis,and absolute certainty.
tallliza 9 months ago
@tallliza When you really become strong in your weak religion, come and show what you have. Game over.(2)
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800 ; Learn the definition of "religion", kid, before you start talking about it. It`s hard to have a meaningful discussion with people still living in the Stone-Age. Good luck with your fantasy. One day reality will knock at the door. Something to ponder.. One of the last prayers of Mother Theresa... God, IF YOU EXIST, have mercy on me. Think !!!
tallliza 9 months ago
@tallliza that makes you hold what you want to believe for true, but it is your proud, not the logic, reasoning, common sense which are with you, your proud make you fool. Start with something that you want about origins, which you feel strong, you have nothing, you will see your reasoning is like water which you cannot hold it among your fingers, obviously a CREATOR is the reasonable conclusion for a healthy mind.
But be happy many people will believe in fantasies, becasue they (2)
xchris1800 9 months ago
@jknengr796 start intellectually holding it, I will prove with elemental knowledge, that even a child may understand that that is fairy tale.
Let's start with the essence of everything: How the universe came from nothing? (c2)
xchris1800 10 months ago
@xchris1800 Your comment is evidence you have no education. An argument from ignorance. Don't bother. It would be like explaining Calculus or Differential Equations to my cat.
jknengr796 10 months ago
@xchris1800 How the universe came from nothing? Only the bible teaches that something comes from nothing, NOT science. What did your creator use to create the universe ? NOTHING, but you never question that, do you ?
tallliza 9 months ago
@tallliza dont like the truth, so i am not here to win people to my side, just to show how fool you are in your dreams, that's all my purpose. Let'see who is more "educated" in terms of reality, and common sense.
xchris1800 9 months ago
@xchris1800 Then give me ONE reasonable answer why YOUR OWN CHRISTIAN COLLEGES do not teach litteral biblical creation. From the 106 colleges that form the " Christian Coalition of Colleges " only 5 teach the creation story as described in Genesis.
tallliza 9 months ago
@jknengr796 PLOP!!!
xchris1800 7 months ago
Atheist are proven to be smarter then theist you stupid idiot!!!! if you believe in god, you can just as well believe in unicorns... so shut up!
FaceMrCare 6 months ago
@FaceMrCare unicorns are rhinos if you look at the first printing of the webster dictionary it says it right there its just that the meaning of the word changed over time
ArtofForte 5 months ago in playlist More videos from zonkas
:D lol
tuitaitei 1 year ago
If you truly believe in Creationism, please take 3 minutes and watch my 'In order to believe in Biblical Creationism' video. If you can still be a Creationist after that, please take the time and explain to me HOW
sgapplebee 1 year ago
with this kind of people humanity is doom :(
hector9462 1 year ago
I was so happy to have found this truly brilliant short comedy film. A good belly laugh does wonders for the constitution.
MrRicehard 1 year ago
This video is PROOF that Creationists are seriously intellectually challenged. These people have a complete and total lack of understanding of scientific principles. They have a complete willful ignorance of the sciences. They have a total disregard for physical evidence and logical problem solving ability.
This is so stupid it hurts!! If any sunday school is playing this for their 5th graders, those parents need to be charged with child abuse.
The
jknengr796 1 year ago
@jknengr796 Excellent comment, I couldn't agree more!
Dennycrane757 1 year ago
it's not something coming from nothing. it's the expanding of the singularity which held all time,matter, and space. it's not a big bang just a great expansion.
Requiemxtoxinnocence 1 year ago
What a load of ignorant bullshit! Science has NEVER said that something comes from nothing. Not once. What science has said is that approximately 70% of the measurable energy in the known universe is known to exist in the space BETWEEN celestial objects; eg: planets, moons etc. When science says this, they are talking about quantum physics. These people are so ignorant that the thrust of their argument is that because science doesn't have all the answers, then the flying spaghetti monster did.
Dennycrane757 1 year ago
@Dennycrane757
What are you talking about???
The Big Bang Theory IS that nothing exploded and created everything. In so many words. You'd probably balk at the idea that Evolution also teaches that life evolved from rocks over billions of years. And yet that is what Evolution teaches. Oh yes, and life came from those rocks after they absorbed the nonexistent oxygen that was in the atmosphere...
confoundtheidols 1 year ago
@confoundtheidols The big bang theory says nothing of the sort. The statement about "something coming from nothing" is just a bunch of bullshit spouted by religious idiots who have just over-simplified what science has said. What science has said is this: They don't know exactly what happened. But they do know the type of event that it had to be. This statement actually speaks to the strength of science rather than it's weakness. Science has never said that life evolved directly from rocks.
Dennycrane757 1 year ago
best comedy series ever
sftf1 1 year ago 2
Order can come out of chaos! And example is a flock of starlings. It's chaos when you look at it, there's no leader and yet they all fly in the same direction and change direction together.
Shimmichan 1 year ago
These people are so retarded, it's hilarious. They completely misunderstand the theory. They misunderstand the difference between biology and physics. They misunderstand basic scientific concepts. They quote mine Hawking. They make ridiculous over bearing analogies. They are devoid of simple logic and knowledge. They need to seek a primary school education...
01eximius 1 year ago
suddenly it all becomes clear
topkev 1 year ago
oh, well if the bible says so, then that must be true. I stone whores and execute homo's too because its in the bible and we all know the bible is true
bdhcarbon 1 year ago
@bdhcarbon Hey ,how it going .That in the Law of Moses In the Gospels when the crowd was about to stone the cheating woman .The brought her to Jesus and he said ""He who is without sin cast the first stone " .My question to you is should we apply his to are life ?
messanicgentile 1 year ago
@bdhcarbon @bdhcarbon Hey ,how it going .That in the Law of Moses In the Gospels when the crowd was about to stone the cheating woman .The brought her to Jesus and he said ""He who is without sin cast the first stone " .My question to you is should we apply this to are life ?
messanicgentile 1 year ago
" evolution can't say what or who created the Universe" ???
WTF....... Evolution isn't supposed to you stupid bitch.... it explains the origin and continuation of life.
Where do they get these idiots from?
philster61 1 year ago
Comment removed
waxybadger 1 year ago
if you leave your garage for 10,000 years , you won't see a car but will see lot of changes such as algae or stones or the garage maybe would just disappear.
sexysailor25 1 year ago
damn, some shameless quote-mining in this vid. . .
SensiStarToaster 1 year ago
How many recorded virgin births have there been in the history of man?... One... Tell me those odds!
skatercez 1 year ago
@skatercez How many recorded virgin births have there been in the history of man?
Ah. None. 0. Less than 1. There are however many many virgin births through out human religions. You could say they are rife with the idea. Christianity certainly wasn't the first to think it would make a good embellishment to a set of stories about morality and control. But simply writing a story makes it no more true than painting a picture. A representation of reality through the filter of a human conciousness.
MrRicehard 1 year ago
Comment removed
skatercez 1 year ago
@MrRicehard that was kinda my point ... but thanks
skatercez 1 year ago
@iFrannkie geocentricism is killing creationist because all creationist seem to be able to do is criticize scientist about faulty theories meanwhile the bible states that the sun revolves around the earth.
skatercez 1 year ago
@skatercez Where does it say in the bible that the sun orbits the Earth ?
messanicgentile 1 year ago
@messanicgentile Bible passages that relate to Geocentrism:
Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and Chronicles 16:30 state that "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." Psalm 104:5 says, "[the LORD] set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that "the sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises."
skatercez 1 year ago
I can't believe people allow these kinds of videos to be made!
mcdonn123 1 year ago
Apart from when they put their fingers in people's bottoms , when do we actually monitor these nutters ?
evidenceonly 1 year ago 12
an attempt to make evolution impossible to believe seems to me that just makes creation seem even less likely
b0gdanB 1 year ago
And the fact that there somwhere in the history of the universe occured a bang is fact. it has been observed.
the question is how did this bang start.
unfad1ng 1 year ago
Quoting Hawkins is weird, since he didnt believe in a god. he said it was unnecesary because the universe can infact create itself but we cant prove that there is no creator however he is not nessecary.
And the problem with a creator is that he has to be created too.
unfad1ng 1 year ago
People like these doesnt deserve to live
unfad1ng 1 year ago
millions of millions of planets, have no life.
And this one has because of the factors that are required are in place.
So saying that it is an argument against evolution that earth has just the right factors is retarded since there wouldnt be life unless we had these factors.
The ignorance of these people is so,,,,,, i dont have words for it,
The car experiment is retarded,
Since it would work , but it could take billions of billions of years and its more likely that someting else evolves
unfad1ng 1 year ago
She is so retarded.
This is so retarded.
Evolution is a fact.
And how the hell can this woman not realise that if god is the creator who the hell created god, a complex being like god cant possibly be spawned into existence, he had to evolve.
The universe began with simplicity.
And the argument that a sinlge change on the earh would make life impossible is retarded, the sole reason why we have life is because of the factors that require life is in place here.
unfad1ng 1 year ago
wow... this bitch uses a terrorist bomb and a rolex watch to model THE BIG BANG? see! this is why Christians are losing support
awesometoast100 1 year ago
What a moronic piece of shit! XD
However, it is actually quite amusing.
makokun9 1 year ago
Christ this fucking video series is annoying.Stupidity defined
philster61 1 year ago
@philster61 Then find something else to do with your time. I am sure you can find something smart to do like watching saw II or playing video games.
jonray305 1 year ago
@jonray305 Much more fun exposing creationists for the retarded idiots that they are. If only they knew how stupid they are.They need people like myself to remind of their mental shortcomings.
philster61 1 year ago
These idiots just don't understand the big bang theory at all. Its kind of amusing how they think everything popped into existence with a help from the divine creator. They don't understand that the Universe wasn't what it is today. It was more of a big expansion. And there was only a few elements in place and it would have been only very hot gases. And Stephen Hawking has recently stated. "there is no need for a creator in the Universe."
philster61 1 year ago
The energy came from the laws of physics. Look at the latest Stevens Hawking research.
candoyja 1 year ago
Think about it this way:
1. How can something good come out of an explosion?
2. You say that before the Big Bang, there was nothing but 85743942579 cells and stuff. So: Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, KABOOM. Explosion = the world.
iFrannkie 1 year ago
I am so,so angry at these horrid people.
BrendanIsCool 1 year ago
The math for the Big Bang goes back to .0000000000000000000000000001 second.
"A single burst of Light'' NO, light had not evolved yet.
''Was an explosion'' NO, it was an Expansion of space-time.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Did this travesty actually just suggest that Jupiter should dissipate into space because it's composed mostly of gas? Really?? Really-really???
DarthVictive 1 year ago
Worst case of misquoting ever!!!
SuperShakespeare1 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy "Organic molecules have been around since the cooling and fusing period post Big-Bang..."
That is total speculation and conjecture. There was no one around to document it therefore it is nothing more than an hypothesis. Until a time machine is invented no one can go back and see what happened 10 years ago, let alone 10 billion (assuming the universe and physical space existed back then for a time machine to even go back to).
seijeff 1 year ago
@seijeff Until a time machine is invented no one can go back and see what happened 10 years ago, let alone 10 billion (assuming the universe and physical space existed back then for a time machine to even go back to)."
Ever hear of evidence? Just because we cannot revisit the scene of a crime as it takes place doesn't mean that there isn't evidence that it didn't happen.
philster61 1 year ago
Actually no, NO-ONE with even a rudimentary knowledge of science would call the big bang an "explosion", most ten year olds could correct you on that annoying plastic-faced woman. I can't believe people are un-educated enough to buy this turd.
rimfa123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bible passages that relate to Geocentrism:
Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and Chronicles 16:30 state that "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." Psalm 104:5 says, "[the LORD] set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that "the sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises." thats what stephen hawking says and that is what is killing creationist to this very day.
skatercez 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
iFrannkie 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy OK, since you refuse to answer my simple questions about 'where did water' come from, and 'where did planets' originate from, and you didn't answer my question to whether it is logical to believe a super-natural being, may have caused the entire universe and everything in it into existence....so my new question is where did organic macromolecules originate from??? If I'm going to stop believing in God, then I need indisputable proof and evidence to convince me otherwise.
xWhiteLightning 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy The DNA molecule is gentically stored digital information, stored in 3 dimensions, with over lapping and embedded sequences which conforms to linguistics laws.The number of nucleotides,ACTG's, are regulated not only in the sequences, but the entire molecule from one end to the other conforms to linguistic laws.The amount of information stored up in a strand of DNA is dumbfounding, and nature has no power to cause something, this complex or even information itself, into existence
xWhiteLightning 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy Yes, I know that life didn't 'come' from rocks, according to evolutionist, but they originated from them. Just think, where did this Earth and everything in it come from. I've heard atheist who believe space-rocks are the originaters of Earth and life, but how is this possible and where's the proof. Where did water come from, comets? Where did plants and life originate from, rocks/nothing? Isn't it logical to believe a super-natural being caused these things into existence?
xWhiteLightning 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy When I brought up Windows Vista I was comparising its complexity with the complexity you need for life. If a computer couldn't of evolved over billions of years do to random chance, what makes you think life, which is far more complex, could have evolved do to random chance. Also, a computer consist of codes such as 101011101, while our DNA consist of a code aswell like ACTGTGAC. So my question is, how could this code that makes up who we are, come by random chance and nonliving
xWhiteLightning 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy What are you talking about? Who told you that lie, and why did you believe it? Have you never studied the intricate complexity of the cell, are you not aware of how unimaginably complex the DNA molecule is. It is logically and scientifically impossible for these things to have come by random chance, especially from non-living material(Rocks). That's like saying Windows Vista, evolved from rocks over billions of years, yet 'Life' is far more intricate & complex than Windows Vista
xWhiteLightning 1 year ago
Evolution is the biggest lie and conspiracy of all times. More and more scientists are converting to creationism because they realize the stupidity of evolution. Stupid lies = evolution.
Hsojaml 1 year ago
@Hsojaml you realize your comment is stupid wright? you just cant say that evolution is lies. you cant disprove atheists muslims jews etc. dont be closed minded idiot next time okay.(:
ctrslimshady 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ctrslimshady yes I can. And yes I have. Many times. And its right not wright. Watch my video on my profile
Hsojaml 1 year ago
Evolution is lies..
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv you cant just say that read some books watch videos listen to both side of the story
ctrslimshady 1 year ago
ummmmmmmmmmm evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. how the fuck do you plan on debating 99% of the scientific community that supports it?
RobtheBig 1 year ago
"the whole big bang idea is first there was nothing, and then it exploded." holy shit these people are fucking retards.
BillKiernan 1 year ago 13
@BillKiernan Wow, you have no clue what you are talking about and it is obvious that you get your information from retarded christians who have no eucation. Your whole idea is that there is this imaginary space wizard who makes stuff from NOTHING. The Big Bang Theory never states that there was nothing then it blew up you retarded liar. Typical christan, has to lie to try to ake a point that you always fail to make.
db10001110101 11 months ago
@db10001110101 *AHEM* calm down, take a breather. i'm an atheist, and when i say "these people are fucking retards" i'm talking about fundamentalist christians. i understand your mistake though, i see red easily and have mixed up peoples posts like you have in the past.
BillKiernan 11 months ago
@BillKiernan Sorry man. I had all my wisdom teeth pulled yesturday and was all doped up. If I had been in the right state of mind I would have noticed.
db10001110101 11 months ago
@db10001110101 haha, no problem. like i said, this type of shit puts me on the warpath too and sometimes there's collateral damage and i mistake what people are saying as well
BillKiernan 11 months ago
@BillKiernan Why take a shot at people who have nothing to do with the video? How very eugenic, but not very moral, or kind.
JonahTorn 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BillKiernan Why take a shot at people who have nothing to do with the video? How very eugenic, but not very moral, or kind.
JonahTorn 10 months ago
After watching this video, I feel disappointed and kind of happy at the same time. Disappointed because these people willingly spread disinformation and mislead people without much knowledge in the scientific area, and happy to know that these kind of strawman arguments don't affect me anymore. I'm happy because after a long process from being religious to being atheist, I have matures intellectually, and I know some of the real answers that many Christians don't believe. It's a good feeling. :)
pr0kris 1 year ago
@pr0kris good on you (:
ctrslimshady 1 year ago
Woah, I've never seen anyone quote-mine Stephen Hawking. In his series "Into The Universe", he makes it pretty clear that he's an atheist. I don't know the original context of the quote that was stated here, but he definitely does not believe in any kind of intelligent creator.
pr0kris 1 year ago
The stupidity of these people gives me a severe headache. Ignorance, dumb on purpose?
havoc873 1 year ago