Bank Foreclosure Fraud pt 4 Of 5 ..."WHO OWNS THESE NOTES" DISCLOSED! DISCOVERY PROSPECTUS PSA!

[DinSFLA]

Yea after these videos... my website became ALIVE stopforeclosurefraud [dot] com and I've learned plenty. check it out.

Thank you for leaving comments.

[2237lemon]

need to establish which is the originator, which is the Remic(trust holding the mortgage), which is the REIT(trust holding the promissory) and which ones are the servicer. a company needs to register as one of these or even a few of these in some cases such as indy mac seemed to be. they looked like originator, Remic who sold swaps as insuirance per se, and servicer all in one.. some investment house like Pimcp probably was the REIT who sold cdo's to little old lady investors as a pension plan

[immafreemann]

excellent expose on the securitization fraud and SEC fraud. The problems at court are that we don't demand the exhibits and evidence be put 'in the record' and or the judge refuses to allow the evidence be put 'in the record' [stamped exhibit 1, etc.] That way no appellate court can 'see' the evidence. If you don't object and get the alleged judge to rule on the objection 'sustained' or 'overruled' you haven't reserved it for future review, you've acquiesced to his 'opinion'. Great research

[hbloch1]

Toll Brothers Luxury Housing...........Go to Youtube...........Looking for Schmucks

[china6518]

Hi I have a question? If a person owned a property and was behind 3 months of mortgage $6000 exact in which was the 3 last payments due on the house..can the bank send an eviction letter without forcloser and actually sell the house without taking the owner to court and stripping them of ownership?..

[joygarner]

DID THEY EVER PROVE THAT YOUR NOTE/LOAN WAS ACTUALLY OWNED BY THIS POOL? Did they ever prove that the pool was actually the "holder in due course"??? Did they prove up that they had been the actual holder at the time that it went missing?

[divabikinis]

The Federal Trade Commission today stepped up its ongoing campaign against scammers who falsely promise guaranteed jobs and opportunities to “be your own boss” to consumers who are struggling with unemployment and diminished incomes as a consequence of the economic downturn. “Operation Empty Promises,” a multi-agency law enforcement initiative today announced more than 90 enforcement actions including FHTM.

[Dre4dwolf]

Good work, there is more to it than that, the hard truth is, the money that was used to pay for the house was yours, Banks are money changers, not lenders, they pretend to lend to defraud borrowers into incuring risk, the bank lends no money, they lend you back your own credit (every-time you swipe your credit card new money is created out of thin air that inflates the money supply).

Debt = Money , Money = Debt

People who do not understand this are wrong, its frankly that simple.

[KingCast65]

@Dre4dwolf

Watch this video from last week at KingCast65 -- Mortgage Movies Journal

NH US Trustee Protects Florida's David Stern Pals at Harmon Law Office on B 10 foreclosure.

I was a licensed Title Insurance Producer in NH and have practiced Civil Rights Law for the government and on my own. Now I point the camera at the liars.

[DAREDARVIL]

The custodial note holders by virtue of electronic assignment, can foreclose even if their not the original lender - the catch: original mortgage was a MOM document, automatically (sans notary) electronically assignable, see site mersinc.org/why_mers/mom Legalized economic slavery or utilitarian equation... which do we think fits the situation best? Property taxes and job loss increases, planned or coincidence?

[Yankhadenough]

Squat until they find the note! (Hint: they never will)

[SoulStay]

Look at the definition for "loan" in your contract. It will say something like "Loan means the debt evidenced by the note plus interest." The loan is debt? No money was given to you? I never got any, did you? Try to find anywhere in the paperwork where it says they gave you $. They never gave you a loan. They tricked you into contracting with yourself. They didn't sign anything. Both parties have to sign for there to be legal contract. There was no loan and there is no contract.

[70road]

I agree that this smells and I have no doubt that their is plenty of fraud to go around, but I have to ask, did you buy a house you could not afford?

[Yankhadenough]

no note, no mortgage.

[hannahunney]

these judges should all be thrown off the bench.

[DeborahADugger62]

Hey part Three is missing on : Bank Foreclosure Fraud- can you help me?

[419boyos]

What doc are you reading from, the instrument in which your loan is in?

[WannaTalkMoney]

Really good stuff....Keep It Coming!!!

[nlab]

DBNT is NOT the one who holds your mortgage note, check the pooling and service agreement. DBNT are the trustee for the certificates. Indymac holds your note. But first they had to endorse there rights in the note away to DBNT, then DBNT endorses the note and gives up there rights to the note, to make certificates. Then DBNT pass the certificate to the administator of the main trust Maples Finance Limited,

You want to check out Indymac c1-1 Corp the are incorporated in Cayman Islands.

[gppceo]

The problem here isn't the fraud. The evidence is substantial, but sequence of events indicating fraud is poorly presented. I worked for 2 Judges. They'd toss this guy not because he's wrong, but can't present. Words like "ok?" "pretty much" etc. blows it by trying to drag people through a pile of evidence without being brief/focused-too many tangents, side-prases/issues. No clear connect the dots linkage. 1st video was close-sigs were good. I'd teach someone & let them narrate with a script.

[Anothercoilgun]

@gppceo

Typical assumption. This is a youtube video. Were you in court? Thanks for making this world a crap hole.

[jwerner79]

Well, you just said what I said in the previous videos in my text comments.

The only problem outside of the fraud is that the original noteholder (actual servicer) IndyMac sold that negotiable instrument before the notary left your door pursuant to UCC "anybody can enforce" pursuant to "assignments." But that is where the problem is (with fraud of course) in who has the fiduciary responsibility!

These bastards owee the debtor millions of dollars in damages for wrongful foreclosure.