sorry,if some sheep here still believe that NIST explained the wtc7 collapse, watch this:
watch?v=ArnYryJqCwU
See that in 2008 Shyam Sunder from NIST said "the public should really recognize the science is really behind what we have said" and "the obvious stares you in the face" LOL!
Dr. Sunder is a Brahmin, a member of India's priestly intellectual caste. He will not lie, but also will not take sides against his "host' the US government. I give him all the credit for not lying to David Chandler and for admitting free fall for 2.25 seconds or 25 meters.
nice clip. have some of you guys saw the wow cheats pack at warcraftbotsXinfo (replace X with .) ? it is incredible, i recently down loaded it. its got totally every thing in it, gold guides, bots, hacks, glitches as well as the new arena glitch. i probably shouldn't tell people about this but at the very least this offers you all a reasonable chance to get it before i pwn you all!
On the beams you can clearly see that they are not cut !! These are the ends of each beam were they once were bolted together .. the bolts were ripped out by the force of the towers collapse .
just what I expected. I posted video links showing you that two whole floors are burning. That show the whole face expelling smoke. that is FACT. And you call it blue sky...
Just like a truther.
I'm done even trying to talk to you.
Have fun fearing everything. Hide in your basement, wear your tinfoil hat, they are coming for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for stopping by. I am sure I will never be able to repair the damage you have done to truth.
When you get around to posting proof of wtc7 fires, please do. I have challenged the offiical story liars for years to show any major fire in wtc7 on 911.
you keep making the same ASSUMPTION. And unfortunatley it is wrong.
you assume these are cut.
Wow... it is impressive that they were all cut straight and true.
1. thermite doesn't cut straight
2. really good ironworkers can make straight cuts, but then there is melted slag on the beams. No slag.
3. How big were the beams when they were installed? I'd be willing to bet, those are the endpoints of each beam... which is why it is so straight and true. Not CD.
Explosives, blow steel apart. they don't bend. You show this one image and make lots of assumptions.
if it was explosives, then notice all the places where things connect. You bring up the bolt anchors at 50sec. LOOK AT THEM. if explosives were used, they would be in shreds. they are not.
Now notice how it is bowed outwards. The building came donw and it popped off the building. the columns were not cut, the welds popped. that is the original ending of those beams.
Ummm you realize there are plenty of videos showing fire coming out of several sides of wtc7 and there are lots of interesting stills that show whole floors of WTC7 on fire right?
v=Afb7eUHr64U
You can see whole secitons under fire easily visible. And you can see smoke pouring out of the WHOLE south side. Not in isolated pockets. The whole building.
Towards the end you can see the fire fully engulfing 2 stories.
dont do it again""? ahahaha. like anyone should be afraid of you and your messages. much less your videos. someone speaks their mind and you censor them....i like that. have enjoyed watching your comments dwindle to just 2 regulars...who are obviously gay. "grilled shill shanks in sauce"? ummmm yeeeeeahhhhh.
All honest research leads toward truth. Follow it.
I am one of the key provers of CD, but, as you might imagine, having proven all the plane images are faked and the airplane parts were planted, the most probable choice is CD!
But, until we capture the imaginaiton of the rest of America and get the real perps tried, we will not know what actually happened.
You were right when you commented that Joe Craine sets the gold standard for 911 research and reporting.
Please thank him again for us, and thank you also for this great channel showcasing this incident of absolute murderous fraud perpetrated by the syndicated jew media/mafia of the world.
If I could do my job half as well as Joe does his, I would have discovered by now how to effectively bring this info to the sleeping masses, and I'd be doing that 24/7.
I wasnt getting what this video is about, Im not sure if it was the monotone speaker or the squiggey writing as I was trying to concentrate on both but whats this video trying to say here, I feel so stupid but I dont want to miss the point
One of the most effective maneuvers of the criminals in running our country is to have managed to suppress all interest in knowing what happened on 911. Thus, all conversations must begin at the most basic point.
NIST after reporting that fire had an improbable likelyhood of being the casue of wtc7 collapse,came back to say it was, indeed, the cause.
The massive rubble thrown against the wall of the next building (verizon) proves it wan't fire.
Ok thanks, but how does rubble thrown on the verizon building prove anything for the other building though?
I'm with you on the inside job I dont doubt it at all after watching hours of vids on it I'm convinced of it I just watch more (to learn more) so I'm able to help others see but sometimes I need help to ripple it downward lol
Awh, your so sweet, its most likely me CNN911 because I had two strokes and what followed me was a horrible memory (when I loved debate) and a very hard time concentrating, so I havent got a young mind and too much stuff going on on the screen has me looking at everything, reading and listening and thats too many things for me personally. Your kind effort is noble, that was so kind of you. THough I would get rid of the squiggly letters and not add anymore, less is more here I think
Several years ago, Joe Craine accepted the burden of trying to achieve justice for Edna Cintron, an employee of marsh mclennan.
He did that, in those early days, by commenting on YT videos. In that process, he was introduced to "debunking" evidence that, as is the case for all 911 evidence, showed the official story a lie.
He has, not so neatly, catalogued and archived most of that.
CNN, that is an awesome testimonial to the hard work and tenacity of your team. You have so much to overcome, and are slowly doing it, despite the monumental problems thrown in your path by those who have a vested interest in the lie.
One of my favorite quotes (edited for space limitations) is:
"The vast masses ... are... a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies. Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" (1925)
And I noticed I did a key typo which you probably ignored, knowing that one video cannot pass 20,000 and the sum total of all videos be at 16,000
Total views crossed 160,000!
My fav quote is from Body Heat
"any time you try a decent crime, you got fifty ways you're gonna fuck up. If you think of twenty-five of them, then you're a genius... and you ain't no genius."
giuliani talking to bush 9/10/01 while rummy was talking about the $2.3 trillion.
When I mentioned 'detailed computer model' I don't mean a NIST cover up version that explains the imposable just in case any sheeple are reading this. It amazes me that we have to explain this to people, what happened to common sense in the last seven years, no way do building relocate under there own steam because a couple of fires are burning. The laws of physics are on the cutting room floor in every TV Station with the motto 'What you see is what you get ha ha ha where's my bag of cash'
Its amazing how effective fire is at cutting through steel, perfect straight line cuts, it reminds me of another poster who after listening to this report responded with, "I'll start my own business in demolitions, forget about explosives I'll just set fire to the building and wait for it to fall down in a neat pile. It will save me a small fortune on explosives and man hours lol'
Personally, my big interest is, even with demo explosives, how the hell did it move that gigantic piece of steel 40 feet across Washington street straight up?
think about it, the odds of any floor falling perfectly straight down on top of the next floor is zero and nil. Here we had a wall move in a perfectly parallel fashion sideways!
I'd have to agree that to move something that massive across 40 feet is hard to work out by chance alone. Some great force would have to be at work, not just cutting charges. Back to the idea of energy weapons as the driving force with cutting charges in the mix, its so hard to understand without a detailed computer model to explain it.
This has been flagged as spam show
sorry,if some sheep here still believe that NIST explained the wtc7 collapse, watch this:
watch?v=ArnYryJqCwU
See that in 2008 Shyam Sunder from NIST said "the public should really recognize the science is really behind what we have said" and "the obvious stares you in the face" LOL!
bernuga 7 months ago
Dr. Sunder is a Brahmin, a member of India's priestly intellectual caste. He will not lie, but also will not take sides against his "host' the US government. I give him all the credit for not lying to David Chandler and for admitting free fall for 2.25 seconds or 25 meters.
Skeptic121 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice clip. have some of you guys saw the wow cheats pack at warcraftbotsXinfo (replace X with .) ? it is incredible, i recently down loaded it. its got totally every thing in it, gold guides, bots, hacks, glitches as well as the new arena glitch. i probably shouldn't tell people about this but at the very least this offers you all a reasonable chance to get it before i pwn you all!
mildrednelfg 1 year ago
For a scientific hypothesis to be proven it must be replicated through
experimentation for validation and consistency.
The NIST cannot replicate even with their own computer models
any aspect of the collapse as portrayed in the videographic evidence
rendering their hypothesis irefutably false.
Unless all scientific knowledge prior to 9/11 using the same standard
scientific method is false.
roxxphatcox 1 year ago
On the beams you can clearly see that they are not cut !! These are the ends of each beam were they once were bolted together .. the bolts were ripped out by the force of the towers collapse .
damondamaged1 2 years ago
Wonder where Sham Sunder is today? Wonder if he has developed a certain paranoia since his performance?
Really good video. Great research. Thanks.
nameofthepen 2 years ago
Wow...
I've been studying the collapse if WTC 7 for along time. And like a foot I overlooked this... Jesus....
Excellent video...
5*
BlueMurder911 3 years ago
BlueMurder911
Many thanks, but don't worry; you have a lot on your plate too!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Oh my last thing...
there is this picture... so 3 floors easily burned out...
img85(dot)imageshack(dot)us(slash)img85(slash)9606(slash)wtc7nbc00001az0(dot)jpg
adorabilly1 3 years ago
img85. imageshack. us/ img85/ 9606/ wtc7nbc0000az0.jpg
doesn't work.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Sorry, I got it - missed a character.
Yup, that image shows that the fires went out on their own - the definiton of a minor fire.
You got more like that?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
just what I expected. I posted video links showing you that two whole floors are burning. That show the whole face expelling smoke. that is FACT. And you call it blue sky...
Just like a truther.
I'm done even trying to talk to you.
Have fun fearing everything. Hide in your basement, wear your tinfoil hat, they are coming for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
adorabilly1 3 years ago
adorabilly1
Thanks for stopping by. I am sure I will never be able to repair the damage you have done to truth.
When you get around to posting proof of wtc7 fires, please do. I have challenged the offiical story liars for years to show any major fire in wtc7 on 911.
No one ever has, because there were none.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
adorabilly1
I deleted your comment restating that 2 floors of wtc7 were engulfed in flame as that is a blatant lie.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Man oh man...
you keep making the same ASSUMPTION. And unfortunatley it is wrong.
you assume these are cut.
Wow... it is impressive that they were all cut straight and true.
1. thermite doesn't cut straight
2. really good ironworkers can make straight cuts, but then there is melted slag on the beams. No slag.
3. How big were the beams when they were installed? I'd be willing to bet, those are the endpoints of each beam... which is why it is so straight and true. Not CD.
adorabilly1 3 years ago
adorabilly1
I delete spam and trolling. Don't do it again.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I wasn't spamming or trolling. I was replying DIRECTLY to you. You are the one that insists.. so I am done. Have fun howling at the moon....
hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
adorabilly1 3 years ago
adorabilly1
I deleted your blue sky dreamy comment claiming fires were clearly visible.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Explosives, blow steel apart. they don't bend. You show this one image and make lots of assumptions.
if it was explosives, then notice all the places where things connect. You bring up the bolt anchors at 50sec. LOOK AT THEM. if explosives were used, they would be in shreds. they are not.
Now notice how it is bowed outwards. The building came donw and it popped off the building. the columns were not cut, the welds popped. that is the original ending of those beams.
adorabilly1 3 years ago
Ummm you realize there are plenty of videos showing fire coming out of several sides of wtc7 and there are lots of interesting stills that show whole floors of WTC7 on fire right?
v=Afb7eUHr64U
You can see whole secitons under fire easily visible. And you can see smoke pouring out of the WHOLE south side. Not in isolated pockets. The whole building.
Towards the end you can see the fire fully engulfing 2 stories.
So it was visible, and under fire.
adorabilly1 3 years ago
adorabilly1
I also delete blatent lies. There were no major fires in wtc7 on 911.
There are very few south side exposure shots. None of those show a major fire and none of those show the source of the smoke.
At no time is there any image shwing fire "engulfing" 2 stories of wtc7
Don't do it again.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
dont do it again""? ahahaha. like anyone should be afraid of you and your messages. much less your videos. someone speaks their mind and you censor them....i like that. have enjoyed watching your comments dwindle to just 2 regulars...who are obviously gay. "grilled shill shanks in sauce"? ummmm yeeeeeahhhhh.
RandomHero1971 3 years ago
Awesome Post! Thanks so much for exposing those paid science whores! How could they disgrace science and America with their lies???
I can't wait until men like Shyam Sunder and John Gross are tried with Conspiracy to commit Murder!!!
WarCrime911 3 years ago
WarCrime911
OK, OK, flattery does get your cap letters back!
I don't think we will see justice, but history will put these murderers and their cohorts where they belong - the shitpile!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
ps, if you want to see those verizon pieces on the ground
watch?v=wZ3HVy3-Pdw
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
warcrime911
do tell me why you block me when 4 known shills are chasing me on your video?
You want to block, block the shills - I was only answering their attacks, which, btw, you could have told them to stop.
You really have the gall to benefit from my contacts, then block me?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I dont agree ith the TV faery but the no planers and the regulars can agree on one thing "CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS" watch?v=MnHLleVjezA
feedbacksol 3 years ago
feedbacksol
Truth is not a matter of belief.
All honest research leads toward truth. Follow it.
I am one of the key provers of CD, but, as you might imagine, having proven all the plane images are faked and the airplane parts were planted, the most probable choice is CD!
But, until we capture the imaginaiton of the rest of America and get the real perps tried, we will not know what actually happened.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
someone needs to make a undebunking 9-11 myths series the material is out there but unfortunately my sory ass doent have the time or expertise.
feedbacksol 3 years ago
feedbacksol
All help is good help.
Comment occassionally, research a lot. back up original videos you may find and all images.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
This guy Sudden Sham guy, I mean, Sunder Shyam aint a scientist. watch?v=XHxnI-qUS0M
Oh and, Hey, Superman can fly in a computer models 'grounded in physics and principles of science'.
Psy0pAgent 3 years ago
Stick with this one. This is REAL science. This is what I was fed as a kid.
watch?v=XHxnI-qUS0M
Psy0pAgent 3 years ago
good work
sidsixpoint7 3 years ago
Many thanks. Encouragement is the fuel that keeps this engine going!
Finding errors is what keeps it on track!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
The Disney style writings a bit much
NefariousEquivocator 3 years ago 3
NefariousEquivocator
Lot's of folks don't like it. It's purpose is to draw attention to ABC, the faux news subsidiary of disney and co-conspirator of 911.
If you have a suggestion for a font that will accomplish the same editorial goal, I am all ears!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
PS, I couldn't pick a good color, either
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
5*/FAV
cherrielane 3 years ago 2
You were right when you commented that Joe Craine sets the gold standard for 911 research and reporting.
Please thank him again for us, and thank you also for this great channel showcasing this incident of absolute murderous fraud perpetrated by the syndicated jew media/mafia of the world.
If I could do my job half as well as Joe does his, I would have discovered by now how to effectively bring this info to the sleeping masses, and I'd be doing that 24/7.
Awesome! Fived, faved and shared.
nameofthepen 3 years ago 2
I wasnt getting what this video is about, Im not sure if it was the monotone speaker or the squiggey writing as I was trying to concentrate on both but whats this video trying to say here, I feel so stupid but I dont want to miss the point
KARStarla 3 years ago
KARStarla
One of the most effective maneuvers of the criminals in running our country is to have managed to suppress all interest in knowing what happened on 911. Thus, all conversations must begin at the most basic point.
NIST after reporting that fire had an improbable likelyhood of being the casue of wtc7 collapse,came back to say it was, indeed, the cause.
The massive rubble thrown against the wall of the next building (verizon) proves it wan't fire.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Ok thanks, but how does rubble thrown on the verizon building prove anything for the other building though?
I'm with you on the inside job I dont doubt it at all after watching hours of vids on it I'm convinced of it I just watch more (to learn more) so I'm able to help others see but sometimes I need help to ripple it downward lol
KARStarla 3 years ago
Star - I know. I have to really STUDY each of this poster's videos myself. But I think I got the point here.
Would a fire/roof collapse at someone's house shoot a big heavy couch out of the front room and completely across the street? No.
Yet the gov't continues to lie to us about what really happened on 911. No mere "fire" scooted that mega-ton chunk of steel beams across that street.
No, something else did it. Something explosive.
nameofthepen 3 years ago
I got that and agree with ya nameofthepen :D
KARStarla 3 years ago 2
KARStarla
I have added some annotations to try to incorporate nameofthepen's excellent idea.
Does it help?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Awh, your so sweet, its most likely me CNN911 because I had two strokes and what followed me was a horrible memory (when I loved debate) and a very hard time concentrating, so I havent got a young mind and too much stuff going on on the screen has me looking at everything, reading and listening and thats too many things for me personally. Your kind effort is noble, that was so kind of you. THough I would get rid of the squiggly letters and not add anymore, less is more here I think
KARStarla 3 years ago
KARStarla
Our mutual friend is sending more suggestions than I can comprehend - I know what you mean about concentrating!
About to add one more hopefully helpful piece.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Noms a doll and so are you, I feel just awful for saying anything with you going through all this trouble besides I'm the defect not you lol
KARStarla 3 years ago 2
KARStarla
Several years ago, Joe Craine accepted the burden of trying to achieve justice for Edna Cintron, an employee of marsh mclennan.
He did that, in those early days, by commenting on YT videos. In that process, he was introduced to "debunking" evidence that, as is the case for all 911 evidence, showed the official story a lie.
He has, not so neatly, catalogued and archived most of that.
It is all perfectly obvious!
Unfortunately, not if a person is just starting!
Thanks
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
"Our mutual friend is sending more suggestions than I can comprehend..."
That is a common complaint about That Darn Cat!
:D
Nom
nameofthepen 3 years ago
nameofthepen
The "Joe Craine" series of videos are considerably improved thanks to your valuable attention.
Total views crossed 16,000 earlier and I am about to have 1 video cross the 20,000 view mark.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
CNN, that is an awesome testimonial to the hard work and tenacity of your team. You have so much to overcome, and are slowly doing it, despite the monumental problems thrown in your path by those who have a vested interest in the lie.
One of my favorite quotes (edited for space limitations) is:
"The vast masses ... are... a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies. Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" (1925)
nameofthepen 3 years ago
nameofthepen
And I noticed I did a key typo which you probably ignored, knowing that one video cannot pass 20,000 and the sum total of all videos be at 16,000
Total views crossed 160,000!
My fav quote is from Body Heat
"any time you try a decent crime, you got fifty ways you're gonna fuck up. If you think of twenty-five of them, then you're a genius... and you ain't no genius."
giuliani talking to bush 9/10/01 while rummy was talking about the $2.3 trillion.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
disgrace to decent indians, these nist people are.
photofu 3 years ago 3
More Bollywood in action, photofu. :D
nameofthepen 3 years ago 3
burn bollywood burn, really though, lol.
photofu 3 years ago 2
When I mentioned 'detailed computer model' I don't mean a NIST cover up version that explains the imposable just in case any sheeple are reading this. It amazes me that we have to explain this to people, what happened to common sense in the last seven years, no way do building relocate under there own steam because a couple of fires are burning. The laws of physics are on the cutting room floor in every TV Station with the motto 'What you see is what you get ha ha ha where's my bag of cash'
youroom101 3 years ago 2
Its amazing how effective fire is at cutting through steel, perfect straight line cuts, it reminds me of another poster who after listening to this report responded with, "I'll start my own business in demolitions, forget about explosives I'll just set fire to the building and wait for it to fall down in a neat pile. It will save me a small fortune on explosives and man hours lol'
youroom101 3 years ago
Youroom101,
Thanks.
Personally, my big interest is, even with demo explosives, how the hell did it move that gigantic piece of steel 40 feet across Washington street straight up?
think about it, the odds of any floor falling perfectly straight down on top of the next floor is zero and nil. Here we had a wall move in a perfectly parallel fashion sideways!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I'd have to agree that to move something that massive across 40 feet is hard to work out by chance alone. Some great force would have to be at work, not just cutting charges. Back to the idea of energy weapons as the driving force with cutting charges in the mix, its so hard to understand without a detailed computer model to explain it.
youroom101 3 years ago 2