Ron Paul is NOT an inch for anarchism. It is a MILE for big business. The core premise of anarchism is to abolish capitalism and big business. Not abolish affirmative action, medicaid, welfare, food stamps, stomp the lower class into oblivion, and cut all Capitalist taxes, while keeping a federal government. Ron Paul is a huge win for big business and capitalists, not for anarchists.
@cmwerner100 i'm talking about free market anarchists, not the leftie anarchists who can't comprehend that the state is the source of big business, and reducing the state is reducing big business. Social security and the welfare state is the creation of the capitalists you hate so much, in conjuction with the power of the state. International bankers fathered the socialist ideology and funded the communist revolution, so all you lefties are cheering on the same people you claim to protest
@dmsthneez Firstly, I am not sure why you brought communism into this. I am an anarchist, not a communist. The two are very different. Second, if you were talking about free market anarchism, than you should have said anarcho-capitalism because all true anarchists know that anarcho-capitalism is not a form of anarchism. It's a contradiction of terms. I agree that the state is the source of big business, but it doesn't follow that reducing the power of the state, weakens big business.
@dmsthneez (continued) Notice, Ron Paul only wants to reduce the factions of the state that have any roots in social equality; affirmative action, welfare, food stamps, medicaid, etc. To take all of these things away, but keep a state in power, would positively crush all the poor people and minorities in this country. In a true anarchist state, one with no government, hence no property rights, these things would be irrelevant given we would all have free access to goods.
@dmsthneez (continued) But to abolish them and keep the state would be the most dangerous thing to true anarchist ideals ever! But then again, as you stated you are a proponent of the free-market, NOT an anarchist.
(Read my response from bottom up... it appears it got posted out of order.)
@cmwerner100 all the same most anarcho-capitalists consider your flavor of anarchy to be just as fake and whimsical as you see theirs. you think it's nuts to uphold property rights, i think the opposite. and i brought up communism because you keep bringing up the welfare state, something that doesn't help its recipients and was always meant to be a control mechanism
Anarchists SHOULD point out that Ron Paul in many ways, has it right concerning many points. Anarchists may want to consider educating others on how and why, the mainstream continues to destroy anything that is non-socialistic and individualistic and conform to the them wholly.
Anarchists should NOT vote or advocate such, yet should remind others votes money, politicians spend millions of private dollars to buy your vote and your freedom...
@nikechiapas but you are, judging people based on the fictional geographical area that they grew up in. "i'm an anarchist but i judge people based on their nationality." RIGHT!!
well i hope he gets there to.but remember the zionest rule the goverment.look what happen to andrew jackson and john and robert kennady.sure hope that does not happen.in we need someone that does not work for the zionest and banks or isreal.
@TheArjan1982 i think all he meant was that anarchy has no centralized power structure. obviously you know that already, he probably just read you wrong
I guess so. I just noticed that Euro-anarchists and American anarchists are so different in their outlook on society and forming groups/working together etc. But that's ok. I probably shouldn't have stated it like that. So, to 655Robert; I apologize. This stupid tyranny BS is stressing me out way too much.
i didnt say not working together,im talking about leaderless resistance.
we will have to ban together to be taken seriously and doing something like getting a few million people to quit paying their taxes to the federal government.
Joe you are not a anarchist if your for ron paul, were you for ronald reagan ? Because thats what ron paul says his political stance is based on, what ron paul says he is going to do and what he will acutually do is two totally different subjects, do some research into (REAGANOMICS) its same shit different assholes and you know what maybe you deserve what your gonna get, go vote like the sheeple you are !!! Do some research into the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, LEO STRAUS, THE KOCH FAMILY.
@Briantology101 haha way to demonstrate your own ignorance, you don't know shit about ron paul or anarchy. you have no idea what ron paul will do, he has nothing to do with reagonomics. and then there's the part where i explained i support ron paul because he wakes people up. seriously dude, get off my channel if you can't even know what you're talking about. yeah i get it these guys don't want freedom they just want to sell t shirts! DUR HUR HUR!!
@dmsthneez I dont know shit about ron paul and anarchy, yeah im sure i dont. First off anarchy means without government and what ron paul or any of the other politicians is going to do is increase the government size, if you buy this pre election public relations retoric your no better than a obamanoid ! You say he has nothing to do with reagannomics hahahaa he said on jones show that reaganoics were geat but the democrats messed it up when they got in lol.
@dmsthneez They dont just want to sell t shirts though do they ? They want to sell POTASSIUM IODIDE AND RADIATION MONITERS ETC !!! Are you dead from the radiation from japan yet ???? Ron pauls wakes people up but he puts them back to sleep by voting from him as stefbot a real aranchist he will tell you the same but i gess you know better right ?
@Briantology101 i don't care what he said about reagonomics, i care about the half dozen books i've read about austrian economics and how that is the school of economics ron paul comes from. anyway i know stefs arguments i'm just not impressed anymore. i don't care what ron paul does with the government, i care about the people he wakes up. that's the difference. they're not going back to sleep, you're just hateful and negative. where are all these truthers buying shirts radiatioon monitors?
@dmsthneez There was many truthers that bought into the radiation scare and to think they still follow such people as ALEX JONES is beyond me ! And t shirts, i see them a few of them now and than when i am in town center but its you guys the americans that are big on the t shirts. It gets you thinking dosent it, did everyother revolution is history need t shirts and silver iodide and all the other fear based products aswell as MICROSOFT PARTNERSHIPS ?
sitting around and bitching about being the perfect little anarchist like stef does definitely isn't getting us results! don't get me wrong i love stef to death and would take free market anarchy anyday, but for now i'll take a constitutional republic over the tyranny we have right now. im in boiling water, any relief will do. and there is no way in hell rp would be worse for the world than the other globalists who are running. at least he'll try to dismantle the fed and the MIC
@dmsthneez I agree sitting around bicthing like stefbot dont got us nowhere but i also think people people like you are pure indenial about the libertarian party and the PAYtriot movements leaders. I believe the some of what the constitution states is the best set of laws to live by, but i know you know that these politicians dont live up to that document, do they ? Define a globalist to me cause you do know who bankrolls the libertarian party dont you, David and Charles Koch, GLOBALISTS !
@Briantology101 i don't care about the libertarian party, i'm an anarchist. ron paul is the closest thing to an anarchist with power we'll ever see. we only live once. look man, i trust ron paul and will continue to do so until he gives me a reason to break that trust. i've met him in person, i know he's real. as for alex jones: all of his haters think he is perfect and never makes mistakes; no, he's like the NWO in his calculated servings of disinfo. and that his listeners are fucking retards!!
@Briantology101 oh and how dare AJ sell DVDs and merchandise to fund his operation.. i thought free markets were what we were fighting for. if you listen to alex jones enough to know that RP mentioned reaganomics recently, then you probably listen enough to have heard alex jones address his haters on all these issues at one point or another. i trust the guy, what i don't trust are people telling me who i should listen to (and it's almost always bill cooper)
@dmsthneez The mans richer than the million dollr man ted dibase his operation is paid for by g.c.n that is n partnership with OUTSOURCERY, he dose have to pay his staff and equiptment but over all if you take all the peoples work he bought up over the years through outsourcing other people dvds and books hes made a nice sweet earner for himself and still is. Now to the potassium iodide topic do you think that was a moral thing to do ? Scaring the shit out of his viewers to by his product ?
@Briantology101 see, i think he scares the shit out of people out of genuine concern. there no way to say that iodide won't come in handy eventually.. it's not like those reactors AREN'T melting.. so no, i don't think it was immoral. what, did he set off the reactors too? i don't mind that he makes money from other peoples books and dvds. half those books and dvds wouldn't see the light of day if it wasn't for him. these people are thrilled to have him promoting their work, i'd bet on it.
@dmsthneez Genuine concern he bought up a whole supply of potassium iodide and jacked the price up to double the store price, there is no problem with the radiation itself its to far away to reach the us it is the plutonium and sesium etc that are the problem and jones knew all this from day 1. So is it immoral to tell people they are going to need a to buy a prouct or they COULD die when he has already bought up the supply a large amount of that product ?
@Briantology101 well sure if that's the case, then yes that would be considered immoral. if true, however, it will have absolutely no effect on how much i listen to the man. for the most part everything he says sits well with me and i think his message is more important than all these petty shady dealings. i know infowars is promoting NIA's new documentary, that doesn't mean AJ is wrong he gets pissed off about tyranny. and that's what i'm in it for with AJ. not his products.
@Briantology101 and anyway, i'm reading tradegy and hope by carroll quigley. he supported the whole new world order, should i put his book down? deprive myself of that info? no. same goes for AJ. and i get my info from so many different sources that AJ really isn't a big part of it or that big of a deal
@ultrafamousgirl Tell me what family has bankrolled the libertarian party and the tea party and a basically all the libertarian think tanks etc ? Could it be the KOCH FAMILY ?
@Briantology101 what difference does it make? you've never seen ron paul be president, you have no idea what he'll do. but based on his record it is reasonable to expect him to work in favor of liberty as the president. this isn't a stretch by any means whatsoever. and about the LP, i don't care because i've never liked it. how can libertarians have a political party? it's absurd. at least ron paul is openly playing the system by being a republican, he doesn't hide the fact.
Does it make a difference which actor/puppet "wins" the presidency next year? I'm sure this election will be a fantastic spectacle and many will be at the edge of their seat... maybe even losing sleep over it (haha I remember those days when I thought it mattered!) but unfortunately I cancelled my cable because 90$ a month for brainwashing seems excessive!
i think Ron Paul would be the best hope in terms of liberty for this country but sadly the brain dead Fox and MSNBC watchers will drink in the propaganda and we'll most likely be back to another round of either an Obama or another Bush, so i'm not feeling too good about the primaries :/ but he's got my vote, and one vote always counts!
hasn't Paul been in govt much longer than Obama? if Paul had no influence on a Repub white house with bush, and certainly not with obama now, where's he gonna get support to get things done as pres? im all 4 a 3rd candid, like ventura maybe. Paul is an interesting choice though...
You are so steaming hot sexy .... but.... anarchy with no government?! NEVER. Like a company with no managing director. Free markets? Never. Anarchists have poorly sort out ideas verging on imature. Leaders and followers... that's the name of the human race's game. There's no way of getting away from it.
and with all those compliments it's be really cool if you were a chick! although men finding me beautiful is fine, i'd just rather it be women looking at me that way! lol
Nirosive hits it on the head, Stefan is a perfect example of this: "I have to agree. I'm an anarchist but I support RP. It's hard to convince most anarchist that it's OK to support him. Probably cause they ignore the NWO."
I'm a Ron Paul supporting anarchist, too. I will vote for him and for Rand, and anyone else who will take a high-profile shot at the FED. The reason why so many people are even aware of the Federal Reserve issue now is thanks to him putting it on the map for the mainstream. So I'm willing to support his power and his voice in any way I can. Purity-obsessed perfectionist anarchists can kiss my butt. I believe in getting real and doing whatever it's going to take.
the big problem i see is this, an economic/political crash is coming... if ron paul gets in he inherits the debt & problems, when he says "we must face the pain now rather than later when its worse" the moronic voters will probably then blame the collapse on libertarianism... i agree with everything you are saying! but i think the globalists will just use ron paul &libertarianism as a scapegoat for the coming economic crash.
I have to agree. I'm an anarchist but I support RP. It's hard to convince most anarchist that it's OK to support him. Probably cause they ignore the NWO.
Did you listen to his interview with Mr Brit where he thinks that letting RP win will only hurt him and the libertarians. It's pretty interesting.
@nirosive i actually had the chance to meet lew rockwell's wife once and was able to let her know that i think ron paul is a clost anarcho-capitalist too! lol!
I'm all for Ron Paul but i don't think voting Ron Paul in will be a revolution. im sure it can be done peacefully but i dont think the people were fighting against will go down without a war........ hope im wrong but i just see a war ahead and not an "infowar" either i know its fucked up but think about it
I'm an AnCap and I'm fully behind Ron Paul. I'm not a fan for voting, but Ron Paul makes an exception.
Jingles2423x 3 weeks ago
I have started a group on Facebook called "anarchists for ron paul 2012" join, we need more posters! ;-)
DecassyJake 3 weeks ago
It sucks so much that you think you are smart.
CheckYoSelf528 1 month ago
Ron Paul is NOT an inch for anarchism. It is a MILE for big business. The core premise of anarchism is to abolish capitalism and big business. Not abolish affirmative action, medicaid, welfare, food stamps, stomp the lower class into oblivion, and cut all Capitalist taxes, while keeping a federal government. Ron Paul is a huge win for big business and capitalists, not for anarchists.
cmwerner100 2 months ago
@cmwerner100 i'm talking about free market anarchists, not the leftie anarchists who can't comprehend that the state is the source of big business, and reducing the state is reducing big business. Social security and the welfare state is the creation of the capitalists you hate so much, in conjuction with the power of the state. International bankers fathered the socialist ideology and funded the communist revolution, so all you lefties are cheering on the same people you claim to protest
dmsthneez 2 months ago 2
@dmsthneez Firstly, I am not sure why you brought communism into this. I am an anarchist, not a communist. The two are very different. Second, if you were talking about free market anarchism, than you should have said anarcho-capitalism because all true anarchists know that anarcho-capitalism is not a form of anarchism. It's a contradiction of terms. I agree that the state is the source of big business, but it doesn't follow that reducing the power of the state, weakens big business.
cmwerner100 2 months ago
@dmsthneez (continued) Notice, Ron Paul only wants to reduce the factions of the state that have any roots in social equality; affirmative action, welfare, food stamps, medicaid, etc. To take all of these things away, but keep a state in power, would positively crush all the poor people and minorities in this country. In a true anarchist state, one with no government, hence no property rights, these things would be irrelevant given we would all have free access to goods.
cmwerner100 2 months ago
Comment removed
cmwerner100 2 months ago
@dmsthneez (continued) But to abolish them and keep the state would be the most dangerous thing to true anarchist ideals ever! But then again, as you stated you are a proponent of the free-market, NOT an anarchist.
(Read my response from bottom up... it appears it got posted out of order.)
cmwerner100 2 months ago
@cmwerner100 all the same most anarcho-capitalists consider your flavor of anarchy to be just as fake and whimsical as you see theirs. you think it's nuts to uphold property rights, i think the opposite. and i brought up communism because you keep bringing up the welfare state, something that doesn't help its recipients and was always meant to be a control mechanism
dmsthneez 2 months ago
@dmsthneez
My opinion
Anarchists SHOULD point out that Ron Paul in many ways, has it right concerning many points. Anarchists may want to consider educating others on how and why, the mainstream continues to destroy anything that is non-socialistic and individualistic and conform to the them wholly.
Anarchists should NOT vote or advocate such, yet should remind others votes money, politicians spend millions of private dollars to buy your vote and your freedom...
PositivelyBored 1 month ago
@cmwerner100
affirmative action? really?
what the hell does affirmative action have to do with anarchism whatsoever?
InvincibleNumanist 3 weeks ago
ron paul's objective is to have a libertarian society, which would be just fine with anarchists opting out.
MirageScience 5 months ago
plain and simple, you aint an anarchist.
leave to fucking americans to fuck up the meaning of a word.
nikechiapas 5 months ago
@nikechiapas but you are, judging people based on the fictional geographical area that they grew up in. "i'm an anarchist but i judge people based on their nationality." RIGHT!!
dmsthneez 5 months ago 4
@dmsthneez dumbass never even thought that im american too did ya? didnt bother to look either. damn you sure do americans proud.
nikechiapas 5 months ago
@nikechiapas anyway
dmsthneez 5 months ago
@dmsthneez thought so
nikechiapas 5 months ago
well i hope he gets there to.but remember the zionest rule the goverment.look what happen to andrew jackson and john and robert kennady.sure hope that does not happen.in we need someone that does not work for the zionest and banks or isreal.
cmwatchers 6 months ago
yup
RonPaulFriends 6 months ago
@RonPaulFriends thanks for checkin it out buddy.
dmsthneez 6 months ago
Is this a joke or parody?
alifeofreason 7 months ago
nicley said
655Robert 8 months ago
@655Robert thanks
dmsthneez 8 months ago
is there a anarchist group in your area?
TheArjan1982 8 months ago
@TheArjan1982 i wish
dmsthneez 8 months ago
@TheArjan1982 hell no.. not that i know of
dmsthneez 8 months ago
@TheArjan1982
there is no anarchist group , thats the point.
655Robert 8 months ago
@655Robert
not working together is the point? what the fuck are you talking about?
TheArjan1982 8 months ago
@TheArjan1982 i think all he meant was that anarchy has no centralized power structure. obviously you know that already, he probably just read you wrong
dmsthneez 8 months ago
@dmsthneez
I guess so. I just noticed that Euro-anarchists and American anarchists are so different in their outlook on society and forming groups/working together etc. But that's ok. I probably shouldn't have stated it like that. So, to 655Robert; I apologize. This stupid tyranny BS is stressing me out way too much.
TheArjan1982 8 months ago
@TheArjan1982
i didnt say not working together,im talking about leaderless resistance.
we will have to ban together to be taken seriously and doing something like getting a few million people to quit paying their taxes to the federal government.
655Robert 8 months ago
@655Robert
exactly, I'm in bro
TheArjan1982 8 months ago
Joe you are not a anarchist if your for ron paul, were you for ronald reagan ? Because thats what ron paul says his political stance is based on, what ron paul says he is going to do and what he will acutually do is two totally different subjects, do some research into (REAGANOMICS) its same shit different assholes and you know what maybe you deserve what your gonna get, go vote like the sheeple you are !!! Do some research into the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, LEO STRAUS, THE KOCH FAMILY.
Briantology101 9 months ago
@Briantology101 haha way to demonstrate your own ignorance, you don't know shit about ron paul or anarchy. you have no idea what ron paul will do, he has nothing to do with reagonomics. and then there's the part where i explained i support ron paul because he wakes people up. seriously dude, get off my channel if you can't even know what you're talking about. yeah i get it these guys don't want freedom they just want to sell t shirts! DUR HUR HUR!!
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez I dont know shit about ron paul and anarchy, yeah im sure i dont. First off anarchy means without government and what ron paul or any of the other politicians is going to do is increase the government size, if you buy this pre election public relations retoric your no better than a obamanoid ! You say he has nothing to do with reagannomics hahahaa he said on jones show that reaganoics were geat but the democrats messed it up when they got in lol.
Briantology101 9 months ago
@dmsthneez They dont just want to sell t shirts though do they ? They want to sell POTASSIUM IODIDE AND RADIATION MONITERS ETC !!! Are you dead from the radiation from japan yet ???? Ron pauls wakes people up but he puts them back to sleep by voting from him as stefbot a real aranchist he will tell you the same but i gess you know better right ?
Briantology101 9 months ago
@Briantology101 i don't care what he said about reagonomics, i care about the half dozen books i've read about austrian economics and how that is the school of economics ron paul comes from. anyway i know stefs arguments i'm just not impressed anymore. i don't care what ron paul does with the government, i care about the people he wakes up. that's the difference. they're not going back to sleep, you're just hateful and negative. where are all these truthers buying shirts radiatioon monitors?
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez There was many truthers that bought into the radiation scare and to think they still follow such people as ALEX JONES is beyond me ! And t shirts, i see them a few of them now and than when i am in town center but its you guys the americans that are big on the t shirts. It gets you thinking dosent it, did everyother revolution is history need t shirts and silver iodide and all the other fear based products aswell as MICROSOFT PARTNERSHIPS ?
Briantology101 9 months ago
sitting around and bitching about being the perfect little anarchist like stef does definitely isn't getting us results! don't get me wrong i love stef to death and would take free market anarchy anyday, but for now i'll take a constitutional republic over the tyranny we have right now. im in boiling water, any relief will do. and there is no way in hell rp would be worse for the world than the other globalists who are running. at least he'll try to dismantle the fed and the MIC
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez I agree sitting around bicthing like stefbot dont got us nowhere but i also think people people like you are pure indenial about the libertarian party and the PAYtriot movements leaders. I believe the some of what the constitution states is the best set of laws to live by, but i know you know that these politicians dont live up to that document, do they ? Define a globalist to me cause you do know who bankrolls the libertarian party dont you, David and Charles Koch, GLOBALISTS !
Briantology101 9 months ago
@Briantology101 i don't care about the libertarian party, i'm an anarchist. ron paul is the closest thing to an anarchist with power we'll ever see. we only live once. look man, i trust ron paul and will continue to do so until he gives me a reason to break that trust. i've met him in person, i know he's real. as for alex jones: all of his haters think he is perfect and never makes mistakes; no, he's like the NWO in his calculated servings of disinfo. and that his listeners are fucking retards!!
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@Briantology101 oh and how dare AJ sell DVDs and merchandise to fund his operation.. i thought free markets were what we were fighting for. if you listen to alex jones enough to know that RP mentioned reaganomics recently, then you probably listen enough to have heard alex jones address his haters on all these issues at one point or another. i trust the guy, what i don't trust are people telling me who i should listen to (and it's almost always bill cooper)
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez The mans richer than the million dollr man ted dibase his operation is paid for by g.c.n that is n partnership with OUTSOURCERY, he dose have to pay his staff and equiptment but over all if you take all the peoples work he bought up over the years through outsourcing other people dvds and books hes made a nice sweet earner for himself and still is. Now to the potassium iodide topic do you think that was a moral thing to do ? Scaring the shit out of his viewers to by his product ?
Briantology101 9 months ago
@Briantology101 see, i think he scares the shit out of people out of genuine concern. there no way to say that iodide won't come in handy eventually.. it's not like those reactors AREN'T melting.. so no, i don't think it was immoral. what, did he set off the reactors too? i don't mind that he makes money from other peoples books and dvds. half those books and dvds wouldn't see the light of day if it wasn't for him. these people are thrilled to have him promoting their work, i'd bet on it.
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez Genuine concern he bought up a whole supply of potassium iodide and jacked the price up to double the store price, there is no problem with the radiation itself its to far away to reach the us it is the plutonium and sesium etc that are the problem and jones knew all this from day 1. So is it immoral to tell people they are going to need a to buy a prouct or they COULD die when he has already bought up the supply a large amount of that product ?
Briantology101 9 months ago
@Briantology101 well sure if that's the case, then yes that would be considered immoral. if true, however, it will have absolutely no effect on how much i listen to the man. for the most part everything he says sits well with me and i think his message is more important than all these petty shady dealings. i know infowars is promoting NIA's new documentary, that doesn't mean AJ is wrong he gets pissed off about tyranny. and that's what i'm in it for with AJ. not his products.
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@Briantology101 and anyway, i'm reading tradegy and hope by carroll quigley. he supported the whole new world order, should i put his book down? deprive myself of that info? no. same goes for AJ. and i get my info from so many different sources that AJ really isn't a big part of it or that big of a deal
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@Briantology101 I wasn't for Reagan, but love RP. They are two different people! I have done research on Dr. Paul for the past 5 years.
ultrafamousgirl 9 months ago
@ultrafamousgirl Tell me what family has bankrolled the libertarian party and the tea party and a basically all the libertarian think tanks etc ? Could it be the KOCH FAMILY ?
Briantology101 9 months ago
@Briantology101 what difference does it make? you've never seen ron paul be president, you have no idea what he'll do. but based on his record it is reasonable to expect him to work in favor of liberty as the president. this isn't a stretch by any means whatsoever. and about the LP, i don't care because i've never liked it. how can libertarians have a political party? it's absurd. at least ron paul is openly playing the system by being a republican, he doesn't hide the fact.
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@ultrafamousgirl ?
Briantology101 9 months ago
It happened to Kennedy, he is going up against the same evil forces.
Ron Paul is the last hope for America, either that or martial law and American Revolution 2.0
reefcut 9 months ago
Does it make a difference which actor/puppet "wins" the presidency next year? I'm sure this election will be a fantastic spectacle and many will be at the edge of their seat... maybe even losing sleep over it (haha I remember those days when I thought it mattered!) but unfortunately I cancelled my cable because 90$ a month for brainwashing seems excessive!
thecrashfantasy 9 months ago
Oh yeah just taking on the FED he has already done more for the people than anybody.Wow he is not even president yet.
100% Ron Paul supporter
isrp14 9 months ago
i think Ron Paul would be the best hope in terms of liberty for this country but sadly the brain dead Fox and MSNBC watchers will drink in the propaganda and we'll most likely be back to another round of either an Obama or another Bush, so i'm not feeling too good about the primaries :/ but he's got my vote, and one vote always counts!
tinyddreamer 9 months ago
hasn't Paul been in govt much longer than Obama? if Paul had no influence on a Repub white house with bush, and certainly not with obama now, where's he gonna get support to get things done as pres? im all 4 a 3rd candid, like ventura maybe. Paul is an interesting choice though...
solidsharky 9 months ago
You are so steaming hot sexy .... but.... anarchy with no government?! NEVER. Like a company with no managing director. Free markets? Never. Anarchists have poorly sort out ideas verging on imature. Leaders and followers... that's the name of the human race's game. There's no way of getting away from it.
ytrogergt 9 months ago
@ytrogergt i'd consider your knee-jerk reaction to be immature, not my well-researched and long-thought out ideas of a stateless society.
dmsthneez 9 months ago
and with all those compliments it's be really cool if you were a chick! although men finding me beautiful is fine, i'd just rather it be women looking at me that way! lol
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez ... Well, I reckon a compliment from one guy to another is more sincere. That's what the world needs more of! :)
ytrogergt 9 months ago
Nirosive hits it on the head, Stefan is a perfect example of this: "I have to agree. I'm an anarchist but I support RP. It's hard to convince most anarchist that it's OK to support him. Probably cause they ignore the NWO."
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@MistrBrit haha, once again, out of love!
dmsthneez 9 months ago
I'm a Ron Paul supporting anarchist, too. I will vote for him and for Rand, and anyone else who will take a high-profile shot at the FED. The reason why so many people are even aware of the Federal Reserve issue now is thanks to him putting it on the map for the mainstream. So I'm willing to support his power and his voice in any way I can. Purity-obsessed perfectionist anarchists can kiss my butt. I believe in getting real and doing whatever it's going to take.
SunscreenAndVitamins 9 months ago
@SunscreenAndVitamins me too, i am also tired of all the purity-obsessed perfectionist anarchists
dmsthneez 9 months ago
the big problem i see is this, an economic/political crash is coming... if ron paul gets in he inherits the debt & problems, when he says "we must face the pain now rather than later when its worse" the moronic voters will probably then blame the collapse on libertarianism... i agree with everything you are saying! but i think the globalists will just use ron paul &libertarianism as a scapegoat for the coming economic crash.
djdnauk1977 9 months ago
I have to agree. I'm an anarchist but I support RP. It's hard to convince most anarchist that it's OK to support him. Probably cause they ignore the NWO.
Did you listen to his interview with Mr Brit where he thinks that letting RP win will only hurt him and the libertarians. It's pretty interesting.
If you missed start it around the 13:00 mark
watch?v=x36kWkB1CD0&feature=feedu
He also recently said in a chat that there is no doubt in his mind that RP is closet anarcho-capitalist. : )
nirosive 9 months ago
@nirosive Whoops...I was talking about Stefan Molyneux's interview with Mr Brit.
nirosive 9 months ago
@nirosive i actually had the chance to meet lew rockwell's wife once and was able to let her know that i think ron paul is a clost anarcho-capitalist too! lol!
dmsthneez 9 months ago
@dmsthneez Nice!
nirosive 9 months ago
I'm all for Ron Paul but i don't think voting Ron Paul in will be a revolution. im sure it can be done peacefully but i dont think the people were fighting against will go down without a war........ hope im wrong but i just see a war ahead and not an "infowar" either i know its fucked up but think about it
TheSolidm16zach 9 months ago
I guess if you are an anarchist then Ron Paul would make a great President.
depfox 9 months ago