19 But she added to her promiscuities, bringing to mind her youthful days when she was a prostitute in the land of Egypt. 20 She lusted after their male consorts, whose sexual organs were like those of donkeys, and whose ejaculation was like that of horses. 21 She relived the wicked days of her youth, when the Egyptians touched and fondled her young and nubile breasts.
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
now wait a minite , how it can be night and day of sunday and only on wednesday the sun and moon been created.
I see that the bible is a human writing , and I am asking who wrote the bible .
after watching the video... that is why i Believe the Bible is true as well as some other reasons. the FACT that the empty tomb of Jesus was indeed found empty needs explaining in itself but not only that what happened to Jesus' body? you all know the answer to that, as well as Jesus' disciples died for the truth no one would want to die for a lie or EVEN not knowing if its true. as well as James and Paul being converted after the resurrection of Christ. no religion can match this unique events
Scienctist think that they know all things. LOL it's funny how a person don't believe scriptures1000's of years from people who never knew each other talked about they same things. I guess becuase you are so anti-religion that your mind won't let you comprehend it.
@aguteempasil thanks for being so specific in your critique. If you thought this was bad, I'd love to know what you think scientific claims that radiocarbon dating should be trusted, or that everything came from nothing - or an even a bigger laugh - that we're to believe in macro-evolution regardless of exactly zero empirical evidence.
In fact, since scientific methodology requires empirical, repeatable evidence, your assumed belief in scientific theories to explain history is based on?
@WillofGod72 i dont know what they've been teaching at bible camp these days, but they are very inaccurate. unlike radiocarbon dating, which like all dating methods points to the same constant. scienctists btw, haven't really said the universe came from nothing, that is rather the argument of a religious person who believes god made it from nothing.
@WillofGod72 and there are absolute mountains of empirical evidence for evolution. transitional fossils (which for some reason creationists totally deny), vestigial genes, vestigial limbs and organs, the list goes on. it is clear from observing human chromosome 3 that we share a common ancestor with chimpanzees. amazing how some religious people put their hands over their ears when presented with the facts.
@WillofGod72 and btw, there is NO archaeological or historical evidence to support much of what the bible claims. the writers of the new testament even got the rulers of Judaea wrong when jesus was supposedly alive. no evidence of moses' existence, or hundreds of thousands of jews wondering the desert for 40 years. nothing.
@WillofGod72 Young Earth Creationism is a farce, it is today's flat and fixed earth in a geocentric universe. I am a geophysicist which uses geochronology on a regular basis. You are today's fools and tomorrow's people will look back at the ever continuing perpetual ignorance machine that is religious epistemology and throw it to the flames. Virtually everything this guy is saying is either absurd, demonstrably untrue, or a bastardization of rheteric.
@kdwormy Wow. That was great example of an educated smear. Too bad you just made up a bunch of empty claims and generalizations based on nothing. Never the less, I pray that the truth will be revealed to you also.
@bigstevejames It's not up to me to do your education for you. Young Earth Creationism is a joke. Although it is a sad thing, I am rather happy that it is perpetuated so much by uneducated Christians as it makes it much much much easier to argue against the value of religion in society.
@kdwormy It's not up to me to do your education for you. Evolution is a joke. I am rather happy that it is perpetuated so much by uneducated atheists as it makes it much much much easier to argue for the value of religion in society. XD (Two can play at this game.)
@bigstevejames My formal education is done, and everything that you are saying is a relief to me. It is only expected. You can play the game, but really you are playing alone.
@kdwormy You think you are educated, but in reality, all of your education was worthless. You could spend your whole life learning a certain theory or philosophy, but that doesn't mean that it is true. There is only one truth, and that truth is God and Jesus Christ. You can deny, and argue that it's baloney, but it still doesn't change the fact.
More interesting Bible facts: The Bible says the earth seats upon pillars. And that it is flat. And that the sun orbits the earth. And that bats are birds. And that insects have 4 legs. And that humans are made of dirt. And that man was made before plants and animals, while woman was made AFTER the animals. It just goes on and on. A book of bronze-age myth.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God
Like I said in the first video, it was pretty much the Emperor Constantine actually trying to unite a broken Christianity during its early history. Their was no unified belief in the divinity or mortality of Jesus Christ and his position in the Holy Trinity. It wasn't a conspiracy, it was actually an attempt at a unified church and putting an end to Christian infighting which early on was quite common.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It is not ignorancy to use one intellect. Riligion is the easy way, for people who are not able to find out the truth intellectually or are just to lazy.
It is ignorant to believe the most flawed and contradictory book in the history of the earth, which is a lot older than 6000 years mate.
Besides the fact that you seem incapable of typing proficiently in-spite of an built in spell checker...
You claimed religion was the easy road for dumb people. That is patently false.
As for your claims about the flaws or contradictions in the Bible; are you really that daft as to think Christians ignore troubling passages? Give me a break. You clearly have not even tried delving into the topic. You are merely regurgitating what you have received through your cultures zeitgeist. Not research.
Yeah built in spell checker,mine's in swedish so it's kinda hard to see what english words i spell wrong.
And why is the statement about beeing religous is the easy way false? it clearly isn't. It's for people who can't deal with the truth, which is that we are not any more special or worth any more than any other animal. That can't deal with the fact that we DON'T know for sure how the universe was created etc.
And yeah, christians do seem to qoute the good parts but never the bad parts.
@Oasics93 if you are doing this from another language, than I apologize. =)
You are writing far better than most Americans.
So please accept my apology.
I rejected your statement out of hand because I myself have diligently searched for and studied for the truth. I hardly know everything, but I have learned much.
I know men far far more learned than I who have studied and research far more than I and who are solid Godly Christian men, as well.
2 Tim. 3:16,17 "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17) so the man of God may be thouroughly equipped for every good work."
Sorry, just had to call ya on this one. God bless my friend.
I know this was like a month ago... but 2 Tim 3:16 itself outlines inerrancy. If God is all powerful (Matt 19:26, Jer 32:17,27, Luke 1:37, etc.) and all knowing (Acts 15:18, Jer 38:17-20, Rom 4:17, etc), and if all Scripture (God's word) is God breathed (breathed means it was inspired by, given life by) then All Scripture is therefore inerrant.
they ALL refer to Scripture. 2 Tim 3:16 states all scripture is "God-breathed." that means that God inspired the writers. that means that God directed the writers. Therefore the "word of God" is His message which is the Bible. That's pretty straightforward logic. His inspired words, what was written down, is the "word of God"--or rather, the WORDS of God.
Yes, especially when all of your presuppositions militate against anything other than themselves. Really, you have to want these things to not be true in order to believe they aren't true. But that's cool, you have the right to think whatever you wish. But ultimately, if the Bible is what it claims to be, than what you BELIEVE about it, is really irrelevant.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Demon hunters shoot down angels in the sky. In the city of god, they are dying. Mortar shells shatter the walls of holiness. The masses are terrified and screaming. Their hope is lost as god's gold turns to rust. Innocents looking to end their pain. Their pitiful lives come to an end. Satan's wisdom brings us to life. Leaving pain for the cowards to endure. The masses of futility are forgotten. We are the champions and they were defeated. We are as one with the demon's darkness.
Ezekiel 23:19-21
19 But she added to her promiscuities, bringing to mind her youthful days when she was a prostitute in the land of Egypt. 20 She lusted after their male consorts, whose sexual organs were like those of donkeys, and whose ejaculation was like that of horses. 21 She relived the wicked days of her youth, when the Egyptians touched and fondled her young and nubile breasts.
WOO HOOOO!!!!!!
TheREALforeverone 2 months ago
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
now wait a minite , how it can be night and day of sunday and only on wednesday the sun and moon been created.
I see that the bible is a human writing , and I am asking who wrote the bible .
ladoyah 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ezekiel 4:12 God basically says eat shit & die, huh?
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight.
tallliza 7 months ago
NO, what you DON'T HAVE is proof.
rubberbulletsofsteel 7 months ago
after watching the video... that is why i Believe the Bible is true as well as some other reasons. the FACT that the empty tomb of Jesus was indeed found empty needs explaining in itself but not only that what happened to Jesus' body? you all know the answer to that, as well as Jesus' disciples died for the truth no one would want to die for a lie or EVEN not knowing if its true. as well as James and Paul being converted after the resurrection of Christ. no religion can match this unique events
danwazhere7 11 months ago
Scienctist think that they know all things. LOL it's funny how a person don't believe scriptures1000's of years from people who never knew each other talked about they same things. I guess becuase you are so anti-religion that your mind won't let you comprehend it.
And God gave them a reprobated mind.
stevejon71 11 months ago
Reliable? This guy is delusional and ripping people off like all pan handlers!
SynesthesianDreamer 1 year ago
even the opening sentence is bullshit. "reliable collection of historical documents". Ha! what a load of crap.
aguteempasil 1 year ago
@aguteempasil thanks for being so specific in your critique. If you thought this was bad, I'd love to know what you think scientific claims that radiocarbon dating should be trusted, or that everything came from nothing - or an even a bigger laugh - that we're to believe in macro-evolution regardless of exactly zero empirical evidence.
In fact, since scientific methodology requires empirical, repeatable evidence, your assumed belief in scientific theories to explain history is based on?
WillofGod72 1 year ago 10
@WillofGod72 i dont know what they've been teaching at bible camp these days, but they are very inaccurate. unlike radiocarbon dating, which like all dating methods points to the same constant. scienctists btw, haven't really said the universe came from nothing, that is rather the argument of a religious person who believes god made it from nothing.
aguteempasil 1 year ago
@WillofGod72 and there are absolute mountains of empirical evidence for evolution. transitional fossils (which for some reason creationists totally deny), vestigial genes, vestigial limbs and organs, the list goes on. it is clear from observing human chromosome 3 that we share a common ancestor with chimpanzees. amazing how some religious people put their hands over their ears when presented with the facts.
aguteempasil 1 year ago
@WillofGod72 and btw, there is NO archaeological or historical evidence to support much of what the bible claims. the writers of the new testament even got the rulers of Judaea wrong when jesus was supposedly alive. no evidence of moses' existence, or hundreds of thousands of jews wondering the desert for 40 years. nothing.
aguteempasil 1 year ago
@WillofGod72 Young Earth Creationism is a farce, it is today's flat and fixed earth in a geocentric universe. I am a geophysicist which uses geochronology on a regular basis. You are today's fools and tomorrow's people will look back at the ever continuing perpetual ignorance machine that is religious epistemology and throw it to the flames. Virtually everything this guy is saying is either absurd, demonstrably untrue, or a bastardization of rheteric.
kdwormy 11 months ago
@kdwormy Wow. That was great example of an educated smear. Too bad you just made up a bunch of empty claims and generalizations based on nothing. Never the less, I pray that the truth will be revealed to you also.
bigstevejames 9 months ago
@bigstevejames It's not up to me to do your education for you. Young Earth Creationism is a joke. Although it is a sad thing, I am rather happy that it is perpetuated so much by uneducated Christians as it makes it much much much easier to argue against the value of religion in society.
kdwormy 9 months ago
@kdwormy It's not up to me to do your education for you. Evolution is a joke. I am rather happy that it is perpetuated so much by uneducated atheists as it makes it much much much easier to argue for the value of religion in society. XD (Two can play at this game.)
bigstevejames 9 months ago
@bigstevejames My formal education is done, and everything that you are saying is a relief to me. It is only expected. You can play the game, but really you are playing alone.
kdwormy 9 months ago
@kdwormy You think you are educated, but in reality, all of your education was worthless. You could spend your whole life learning a certain theory or philosophy, but that doesn't mean that it is true. There is only one truth, and that truth is God and Jesus Christ. You can deny, and argue that it's baloney, but it still doesn't change the fact.
bigstevejames 9 months ago
@bigstevejames Thanks for the reaffirmation.
kdwormy 9 months ago
@bigstevejames
What a sad brainwashed person. I feel sorry for you mate.
rubberbulletsofsteel 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imaginefree69 2 years ago
tyvm for posting
thefluffy7 2 years ago
oh i love you thank you for posting!
calledforhiswill 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God
John 3:16-18
coolvideo28 2 years ago
can anyone reference his claims on the archiological digs and dates?
RunicArtist 2 years ago
it's on his site. It's all true.. you can check it on wiki or anther engine
Widlyman 2 years ago
google it :)
iamnotbutinoiam 2 years ago
"THAT's just layer number one" lollll
NecrosVenator 2 years ago
Like I said in the first video, it was pretty much the Emperor Constantine actually trying to unite a broken Christianity during its early history. Their was no unified belief in the divinity or mortality of Jesus Christ and his position in the Holy Trinity. It wasn't a conspiracy, it was actually an attempt at a unified church and putting an end to Christian infighting which early on was quite common.
chayah27 3 years ago
The bible is the most exalted accumulation of nonsense ever produced by man. There is NO evidence whatsoever.
Philos2006 3 years ago
You dont belong here INTELLECTUALLY... because obviously you are ignorant of all the facts proposed
iamnotbutinoiam 2 years ago
It is not ignorance, it is saying no to a Holy God.
bigdaddy403 2 years ago
bigdaddy403 Saying No to our Creator to Creator of everything to to a Holy God is ignorant
coolvideo28 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It is not ignorancy to use one intellect. Riligion is the easy way, for people who are not able to find out the truth intellectually or are just to lazy.
It is ignorant to believe the most flawed and contradictory book in the history of the earth, which is a lot older than 6000 years mate.
Oasics93 2 years ago
@Oasics93 you are completely unfamiliar with the topics on which you speak.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 2 years ago
Oh i don't don't i? please explain your opinion why i dont.
Oasics93 2 years ago
Besides the fact that you seem incapable of typing proficiently in-spite of an built in spell checker...
You claimed religion was the easy road for dumb people. That is patently false.
As for your claims about the flaws or contradictions in the Bible; are you really that daft as to think Christians ignore troubling passages? Give me a break. You clearly have not even tried delving into the topic. You are merely regurgitating what you have received through your cultures zeitgeist. Not research.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 2 years ago
Yeah built in spell checker,mine's in swedish so it's kinda hard to see what english words i spell wrong.
And why is the statement about beeing religous is the easy way false? it clearly isn't. It's for people who can't deal with the truth, which is that we are not any more special or worth any more than any other animal. That can't deal with the fact that we DON'T know for sure how the universe was created etc.
And yeah, christians do seem to qoute the good parts but never the bad parts.
Oasics93 2 years ago
@Oasics93 if you are doing this from another language, than I apologize. =)
You are writing far better than most Americans.
So please accept my apology.
I rejected your statement out of hand because I myself have diligently searched for and studied for the truth. I hardly know everything, but I have learned much.
I know men far far more learned than I who have studied and research far more than I and who are solid Godly Christian men, as well.
Your statement was based solely in ignorance.
AtlantiansAnAlteran 2 years ago
Thank you :)
My opinion is that yours is based in ignorance. So i guess we won't get to an agreement here. So let's just agree that we disagree!
Oasics93 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Contrary to what most people have been indoctrinated with, Judaism,
Christianity and Islam are relatively new religions. Humanity goes
back tens of thousands of years. These three have worked relentlessly
to keep us from spiritual knowledge and using this power, of which all
of us have."
w w w . e x p o s i n g c h r i s t i a n i t y . c o m
(with out the spaces)
JOSCHILD 3 years ago
What's silly is that the Bible itself
NEVER claims to be "the word of god",
nor does it claim "inerrancy."
Yet christians insist on painting themselves into a corner
so that they must abandon reason to remain "faithful."
And choosing one particular translation is especially silly.
Look up the word "Easter" in your KJV.
You'll see that it SHOULD have been "Passover."
I studied the Bible for 44 years;
it's as full of holes as a sponge.
Imaginefree69 3 years ago
2 Tim. 3:16,17 "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17) so the man of God may be thouroughly equipped for every good work."
Sorry, just had to call ya on this one. God bless my friend.
HeReformedMe 2 years ago
"Sorry, just had to call ya on this one."
You quoted a verse from the Bible.
What do you feel you have "called me on"?
This verse makes NO reference whatsoever to inerrancy,
is makes no mention of the phrase "the Word of God."
So what was your point?
Imaginefree69 2 years ago
I know this was like a month ago... but 2 Tim 3:16 itself outlines inerrancy. If God is all powerful (Matt 19:26, Jer 32:17,27, Luke 1:37, etc.) and all knowing (Acts 15:18, Jer 38:17-20, Rom 4:17, etc), and if all Scripture (God's word) is God breathed (breathed means it was inspired by, given life by) then All Scripture is therefore inerrant.
Passages about Word of God
Rom 9:6, 1 Cor 14:36, **EPH 6:17**, Phil 1:14, Col 1:25, 1 Sam 9:27, 1 Kings 12:22, etc.
Total times "Word of God" appears:47
NecrosVenator 2 years ago
"Total times "Word of God" appears:47"
Number of times it refers to scripture: ZERO
Imaginefree69 2 years ago
they ALL refer to Scripture. 2 Tim 3:16 states all scripture is "God-breathed." that means that God inspired the writers. that means that God directed the writers. Therefore the "word of God" is His message which is the Bible. That's pretty straightforward logic. His inspired words, what was written down, is the "word of God"--or rather, the WORDS of God.
NecrosVenator 2 years ago
"...and that means... and that means.. and that means.."
Nice long string of logic ya got there,
but that is NOT what the scripture says.
The truth never needs such complicated defence.
The phrase "the Word of God" in the Bible
NEVER refers to the Bible.
You would know that if you would read it.
Imaginefree69 2 years ago
sigh... u guys... do what he said k? U dun need to defend the bible! :D It'll just go in roundabouts!
patricksoo 2 years ago
"It'll just go in roundabouts!"
Yes, especially when all of your presuppositions militate against anything other than themselves. Really, you have to want these things to not be true in order to believe they aren't true. But that's cool, you have the right to think whatever you wish. But ultimately, if the Bible is what it claims to be, than what you BELIEVE about it, is really irrelevant.
HeReformedMe 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
RobertBaral365 3 years ago
Where is Why I choose to believe in the Bible, by Voddie Baucham, it WAS SOOO GOOOOOD!? If yall know where I can get Voddie Bauchams sermon videos
Homeskoolfam6 3 years ago
brilliant...simply brilliant.
koalalad 3 years ago 7
"corroborating evidence" n. evidence which strengthens, adds to, or confirms already existing evidence
WillofGod72 3 years ago
whats that word cowbarting witnessses how do you spell that
pungadoo 3 years ago