Added: 3 years ago
From: williamfdgo
Views: 231,987
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (444)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Awesome!!

  • very cool rock n roll baby

  • shit ther lead singer is awesome

  • I've listened/watched this about 25 times...never gets old!!!

  • Not too bad...

  • best version of this song, hands down

  • love this !!!!!

  • AWESOME!!!!

    

  • migliore cover...grandissimi

  • they rock!!!!!!!!!!

  • A real ball-tearer !!!!!!

  • Excellent!

  • POWERFUCK!

  • great cover :):):)

  • this cover rules. =D

  • The Rock Man xD

  • Heureusement qu'il existe encore des émissions comme Taratata à la TV Française ! Géniale cette cover !

  • Fantastic!!

  • What a few of you people haven't a clue about is that the Stereophonics are not only an amazing band in their own right but when they cover any song from a long list there is never a time you can say ( not bad ) these guys show the upmost respect for the artists who originally wrote these songs... go see them live and you'll see exactly what i mean....

  • @snatchwars with all the respect, of course, for the absolutely honest job of these guys.

    Covering, even at the highest level, is not certainly creating.

    The Stones are where they are after 50 years for some reason......

  • BEST COVER OF THE SONG

  • I agree. If not the best, certainly one of the top two covers of this classic.

  • not a bad cover, but i find it extremely lacking without the falsetto "Rape...murder..." bridge.

  • exellent cover, great voice!

  • Good, but no one does it better than the Stones.

  • @ggjones7596 and no one will ever do...... sorry.

    This masterpiece comes from hard times (the 68, Vietnam war, etc), where creativity was everything.

    The Stones have been managing the arrangement of this song for half a century, this means they edited tens of different versions, on which Richards expressed the highest talest as creative , here including the Wino's version (greatest). Although Mick Taylor contributed heavily.

  • Good cover but not quite in the same league as Thunder's...

  • GREAT COVER!....COOL !......THANKS !

  • not only do they sound great the older they get but damn they are good looking fellows.

  • Seems like 14 f..tards didn't get any shelter early in life.

  • Spot the f..k ON !

    Bet Keith smoked a big bowl after groovin' on that.

  • Best F@#$%ing voice in the business. Period!!

  • This is ok. The equipment sounds ok and there was some good energy in the performance, but it was only really good in the sense that a good x-factor cover of a great song is good. To show you how mediocre and average musicianship is today listen to Ruth Copeland's version with Eddie Hazel.

  • superb !!!!!!!!!!!

  • 2:42 haaa :D

  • I like the stones version more, but stereophonics just rocked the song hard, i love it

  • great cover

  • This is awsome! Also look up 'Paul Brady and the Forest Rangers', I'm not comparing their version to the Stones', but they've really made it their own!

  • wow the lead's falsetto is awesome

  • Someone needs to do a much heavier version of this song. This song would sound great with some heavy guitar. I'm thinking Disturbed but with someone else's voice.

  • @nce74 Look up "Thunders" cover of it.

  • not many bands could cover that song. Great job!

  • possibly the best cover version of Gimme Shelter!

  • this is a b-side to "my friends" if anyones wanting it :) awesome cover :D

  • leave oasis out of it people, top cover man

  • wow Kelly needs to sing in that tone more :PP

  • Comment removed

  • pazzesca!

  • Awesome, awesome, awesome

  • fucking amazin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • What a cover.... the stones version is brilliant... bt a real rocky version like that is amazing!!!

  • Excellant Jam!!!!!

    Anyone got an MP3 of this?.....Amazon doesn't offer it. :(

  • @unrealmisery just use a youtube to mp3 converter dvdvideosoft do a gd 1

  • @unrealmisery Type in vid 2 mp3 on google - Then top one, download in high quality or standerd.

  • @T3HLOLZORZ guess you don't know too much about music, if the Stones hadn't written this song these guys wouldn't have been able to cover it . The fact that they have ,shows that they , like pretty much everyone but you has respect for the most definitive rock band of the last 50 yrs......and by the way they have done it justice.

  • Comment removed

  • @T3HLOLZORZ Hope it was just a joke ^^" ...

  • @T3HLOLZORZ, you're a douchebag, who knows nothing about REAL music. Now go listen to your shitty Oasis, kid) lol

  • who wears sunglasses indoors nowadays

  • @HilroyHartley

    Only cool people.

  • FAILURE! If you're going to cover a song, YOU DON'T SKIP THE BEST BLOODY PART FOR FUCKS SAKE! They have two guitarists, there is nothing stopping them from doing the harmony at the beginning, bloody amateurs.

  • @fullclip16117

    Doing cover means to do YOUR OWN THING. You have no idea about music you pompous twat.

  • @ebaymotion Excuse me for having an opinion, but it just seems rather cheap to cover a song and then skip the best part. Its like the equivilent of a shagging some girl, then pulling out just before you blow your load to go take a cold shower.

  • @fullclip16117

    It's only your opinion that the beginning intro is the best part of the song. Some may not like it. If you love it so much, cover the damn song yourself.

  • full throtle !!!

  • Well done boys and as a survivor of altamont and white lake ! ! i would say very well done indeed (very convincing cover) Im sure jagger and the boys are proud !!! Well done from santa clarita, CA

    P.S I am using my grandsons utube - he is into rap l o l !!!

  • I think that this is great because it is what it is - a cover done in the band's style that really suits them. And they have bags of style!! Nice glasses... You'll never beat the original, and the phonics don't set out to; they're just having fun doing what they love - lucky bastards!!

  • He's miming this but I still love him lol classic cover

  • Kick ass cover, and for being done live, extra points!

  • It takes balls to cover this right and it looks like only stereophonics and meatloaf did it right!!!

  • Stereophonics are such an underrated band.

  • this is the best cover

    just a little harder than the original, but not too much :D

  • The singer's voice is better than jagger's

  • @DeadbeamNetworks ''The singer's voice is better than jagger's.'' You're a cock. Who knows nothing about music. I listened to this cover months back and thought it was alright. Now it just sounds ridiculous in comparison to Jagger and the original. These imitations from a later generation will never come close to the natural talent and creativity of those bands they idolize. Just different times back then. Horrible cover. And it's pure ignorance to say it's better.

  • @Underground906 why are you all butt hurt. I just think jagger should have sung like this in Gimme Shelter because it would sharply counteract the music having a hard voice and soft music. I didn't mean his voice is just better, I meant to say that the way he sang was IN MY OPINION better than the way Jagger sung in the original. If you get mad at someone saying something without them first backing their opinion just tell me to explain instead of flipping out douche bag.

  • @Underground906 His voice would complement the original because his hard voice would be in sharp contrast with the original's soft music.

  • @Underground906 im a "cock" ,because I have an opinion and I "dont know anything about music" ,because apparently I have never heard any music ever nor played any musical instruments nor know anything about anything at all. You sound like a butt hurd dickwad, that is what you sound like. Why are you coming here to troll on me because I said something when you could better be using your time listening to the original.

  • @DeadbeamNetworks Not butthurt.To assert an opinion like that as if it was a fact was just silly. He comes no where close to Jagger in performing this song. And that's what Jagger did. And he was several orders of magnitude greater than this gravelly voiced, try hard, pub kareoke version . His performance, charisma, stage presence doesn't come close. No finesse. And I like Kelly, he's done some great covers. But tackling the Beatles or the Stones exposes a one dimentional, imitation singer.

  • @Underground906 in all honesty your a bit of a dick

  • @l14mk A typical youtube faggot fan boy. Can't have anyone point out the truth. Silly twat.

  • @l14mk What would you know know about music anyway you little nerd? He done's a few beatles/stones song. All with the same style of voice. The only one he has. Take a listen to the Beatles and Stones tracks he' covered by the original artists and see how much variation there is in those songs alone. And then witness the lack of it with Kelly. Still a fan of Kelly but it's a fact.

  • @Underground906 but why click on a video to give start an arguement

    troll

    typical troll

  • @l14mk I clicked because I'm a fan of Kelly and liked his other covers. But I disagreed with a comment I saw here about this being better than the original. No fucking way does even touch the original.

  • this is the best cover iv ever heard.

  • wahouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

  • The guitar in the original is used as a the most powerful instrument and complemented by everything else. This cover is all over the place and that is why it is 'weak'

  • @AlexxxxxSaysHi

    i think this is one of the better covers of this song out there.

    Just because they play it they want to.

    A cover should have your touch to it.

    otherwise it would've been called a copie!!!

  • @AlexxxxxSaysHi The only think that is weak is your flaccid 1.5 inches. the only time you get hard is when some other guy is fvcking you up the ass.

  • 12 dislikes my ass fucking idiots !

  • i don't get how this can be seen as a weak cover?

  • Awesome cover, but did anyone see the spit coming out of his mouth at 2:43 ?

  • They are brilliant live! This is an amazing cover :-)

  • phonics + the stones... I think I could cry :')

  • Awesome cover. Very powerful.

  • Woah, Respect for Stereophonics just skyrocketed :D

    Seriously, this was live? They sound fucking amazing!

    I prefer the stones version, but this is amazing - especially considering it's live! :)

  • @ash356 it probably sounds a LOT different for the studio audience than for people watching it here or on television.

  • This is such a powerful song a band that covers it needs to give it 110% and give out so much energy, you can tell the band gave this they're all which resulted in a fantastic cover!

  • fucking amazing!

  • I would sell my soul to have been at that show. ;_;

  • pause at 0:42 and look at his mouth.....

  • I think the Original is Epic but this is just Awesome~!

  • F'ing awesome!!! 

  • classic mixup

  • hey you 10 dislikers...go f**ck yourselves..this is an epic cover !!

  • make that 11 man. red hot chilli peppers are complete cocks, who suck cocks. I guess you're into that you faggot.

  • I'd like to see Dave Grol sing this

  • @raresaturn As nice as he is to look at, personally, I'd rather hear Dave Grol sing the song. :P

  • Not bad. I like their choice of guitars & the backing vocalist singing falsetto. They could have made the guitar solo about three times as long, though. They could just copy one of Mick Taylor's solos. Also, it would help to pick up the tempo a little; sounds a bit on the lumbering side.

  • dang these guyts are pretty good at rolling stones

  • awesome perfomance ... 

  • not that good as Rolling Stones but they are close.... :D 

  • 10 people couldnt find shelter

  • Best cover ever, simply.

  • OMG what a man! kelly jones i love you ♥!

  • power!!!!

  • Kicks ass!

  • My favourite band covering my favourite song of all time

    Superb

  • @akerman79 you're a stupid cunt, you haven't properly listened have you? awesome fuckin' talented band makin' a kick ass song even more kick ass. thanks to your petty comment, you've made me want to find yu and shoot you repeatedly, but i'm too busy; listenin' to that genius kelly jones

  • @Lukith66 seriously, listen. GO F@CK YOURSELF.

  • @akerman79 Why don't both of you clowns grow up and shut your filthy mouths? How courageous of you to fight on YouTube... ohhhhh tough guys.

  • @s4099274

    Aaahhh! the great spirit comes to the rescue. Thank you for your wise contribution. If only this world would be a place where every1 agrees with our opinion and our likes. Good night and good luck

  • @Lukith66 I feel compelled to ask you to stop being so silly. This is a really respectable version of one of the best songs ever. It still falls well short of being ''even more kickass'' than the Stones though. By a large margin.

  • this is a great version . i love that guys voice .

  • 1:21-1:23 is my favourite, fuck yeah!!!!!!

  • cool as fuck !

  • fuck me.

  • @MrsAckles09 Name and number...... I'm not laughing....

  • @s4099274 Sorry, baby. I'm saving myself up for Jensen Ackles. (;

  • Nice...Well done !!! GOOD BAND !!!

  • 10 deaf people watched this video.

  • Nice cover

  • if got something lika a 3sec-5sec delay between voice and picture but that doesn't matter great tune =D

    great band

    great sung

    both thumbs up =D

    thanks for posting and great audio quality

  • WHAT A SOUND! WOW!

  • Sound amazing as usual!

  • not just god!!!it's a great performance!!!!they kept the original feeling and the touch they added is amazing!!!Guitars!!!Vocals!!!i­'m listening this version instead of the original for days now!

  • what a cover :)

  • It just shows how strong Kelly's voice is by how he keeps the mike quite far away from him and still sounds great. Excellent cover!

  • Excellent cover of the best rock and roll song of all time.The Stones themselves have never come close to the original with Mick Taylor's guitar and Merry Clayton's stunning vocal.

  • @b3n2p1 Mick Taylor doesn't play on the album version.

  • not a patch on inspiral carpets version.

  • AWESOME !!!!

  • sounds really empty compared the original so no point in playing it!

  • @talltim24 Well you know before too many more years the original classic rockers will all be gone. Then we'll have nothing but the original recordings and cover bands.

  • angie is a better cover done by the mighty stereophonics u should listen to that!!!

  • yum......want to get that boy in me!

  • Ofcourse it's not the original, but it ís the best cover i heard of it..

  • So incredible.

  • he's just nothing compared to Jagger.

  • @beatsofsoultrain

    very different and Jones isnt as influential by any means but still an excellent frontman.

  • THAT IS HOW YOU COVER A CLASSIC.IT IS HARD TO COVER A STONES SONG.

  • good cover..best among the rest

  • This is THE Version!

  • Excellent cover! They did it again!!!! =) Love ot see hear this in a gig!

  • amazing band,good cover

  • very good change to great performance

  • wow!!!.....cooler than a polarbears bollocks!!!!

  • Nothing will ever beat the original!

  • Mick wishes no such thing. He's freaking Mick Jagger, for crying out loud.

  • truely awesome just the most amazing voice! would be great if they did this is june but no chance of that!

  • play ing it a bit slower to keep it safe

  • keep on ROCK

    what a great breath for me

    more moreeeeeeeeee

    moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • ...perchè non c'è performance migliore al mondo.

  • Best band in the world - Im talking about the mighty "STEREOPHONICS" of course - They rock my fucking world upside down !!!!!!!!

  • Fuck me do the phonics know how to pick their covers or what - Incredible, really funky verses with the guitar slides - Deadly !!!! Best band in the world !!!

  • now thats how you cover a great tune :)

  • this is a good rendition, raw rock-n-roll at its best. Try Ashley Clevelands version, its kick.