To all you little commies out there. Reagan was one of the best Presidents of our history. With that said. Ya this video was VERY funny and creative! Even us consevatives have a sense of humor and can laugh at a good joke.
Rock ON, "zamaz99".....i was in my 20s during the Rayguns regime. Even evil ol' ex-President Nixon was critical of what Rayguns was doing to the country. Nixon predicted that, if Rayguns had his way, by the time the 21st century was 10 years old, we'd be screwed! Guess he was right. BUT THERE IS ALWAYS HOPE!!!!!
reagan was the worst president he fucked our economy up .always getting on tv threating to blow the world up starting wwlll .telling other countries that we got more weapons then everyone else .i sure am glad it's not the 80s anymore.and all the stupid people saying that the 80s were better than today .it's always been a fucked up nation from the start
This is funnier than Toilet Paper strung out of your bosses ass as he is leaving the Mens Room. We're losing our freedoms to make jokes like this. SNL has become way to PC with politicians and goes to far with the general public. Fuck them sellout motha fuckas
Does anyone know the name of and where I can find on youtube or anywhere a classic short film shown on night flight about a cafeteria worker who goes nuts due to the monotony of her life. She keeps saying tater tomato as she serves the customers. Hope to find it on you tube so funny! thanks for any help
PS to any one who thinks the rich did not benefit from worldwide drug trade, making legal substances illegel (LSD, pot, etc) and that there are whole industries that were founded on outlawing or CONTROLLING drug trade (define "drug" while your at it, pill-poppers and Barney Gumbles of the world) please just jump in a lake. ;)
this is funny, but the real message of the "spoof" was on target, drug trafficking increased during the Reagan years, police, military, HMOs made a bundle off of peoples drug use, and treatment was thrown out the window. God bless Night Flight, just when I thought my childhood was barren of real commentary, unstained by corporate BS, I realized I was raised with some pretty cool shit.
@5winston yeah I bet the drug trafficing increased, these clowns were behind it. Look up Barry Seal. The CIA is doing it right now, running all the opium they can out of Afghanistan, selling it in Russia and even here to our own people.
Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th century and I think this vid is fantastic! We always loved Night Flight and was sorry to see it go. We had great hope for cable TV, but most of it is crap.
How is it that the old USA, Nostalgia Channel, TV land etc reran all sorts of great old bizzare stuff when there were only a few cable channels, but now that there are 100's of them there's almost nothing original to be found.
And "Arts and Entertainment" runs spook shows. Amazing.
Republican or Democratic, it well never make a change 2 this world!!!What well is if we all stop bitching about who's RIGHT AND WHO"S WRONG!and work on the task at hand!thats what gets things done.
The founding fathers and mothers did not win a war agents british witch ruled the world for over200 years by bitching about WHO'S RIGHT AND WHO'S WRONG!! now did they?!
Reagan made me a staunch liberal at age 14. Gawd how I hated that evil bastard. He helped push this country towards total corporate control. The rich got richer, the poor got poorer, and the middle class started getting screwed when he became president. Republicans are so harmful to this country. And, I agree with the person who said we never expected that anyone could top this moron in stupidity. Yet, we got stuck with Bush Jr. Ugh! Never again, let's hope.
Here here, The dentured cowboy drove a wedge right into the heart of the middle of America that still exists to this day. He was dead set against raising income taxes but he raised every other tax he could think of and we are still paying today. Just search for Reagan and tax increases. This guy was the death of the United States as we used to know it.
Martin Luther King was a republican. AS were virtually all black people in his time. Because the Republican Party has a long history of actually doing things for minorities and the poor.
Do you ever stop to think that democratic leaders have spent billions and billions on fighting poverty for the last 30 to 40 years. Why haven't things ever gotten better?
Zamaz99, you are not a staunch liberal. Tip O'Neil was a staunch liberal. You are a left-wing extremist and you belonged in Nicaragua. A true liberal would oppose Soviet Communism. I was in the U.S. Army hoping that I would find American traitors in Central America. My unit conducted manuevers in Honduras in 1985. I wish I met you there, zamaz99. I really do.
I have to admit when I was younger and naive, I liked Reagan. It was only until I was 15 and moved to the Bay Area in '84 and saw the reality of what was going on. I started questioning things and reading more about the truth was then I was enlightened and became a staunch lefty!
I still have a funny and bad feeling Palin might get it in 2012. I hope I am wrong but I really think Obama is getting swiftboated times a thousand right now.
Pailin?? you're on crack bro. If anything the only republican worth a flying fuck is Ron Paul, and even he's got no shot. Do me a favor and don't watch TV all they are doing is what they do to any President when he goes against the monster we call big business
@zamaz99 "how I hated that evil bastard." Oh please, lighten' up will ya. You sound like that guy in "Stripes'... Francis... who always needed to chill. So Francis, did you ever hear that saying about the 'Business of America being business.' It dates all the way back to Calvin Coolidge in 1925. Liberals aren't very well read, nor do they practice the compassion they're forever preaching. So you 'hated' Reagan? Did you wish for his death in a plane crash like that loser recently said of Palin?
@jfrockon this country needs to be ethnically cleansed of people like you. you are the reason we are hated throughout the world and continue to be the object of terrorism.
@PlaystFreak if that is their wish, liberals are free to do so. it would be fun to have sex with your face till you barf jizz on yourself. can i do that?
Hey Re-pubic-conserv, you are complete freak. I went to your channel. Obama is in office..drink some kool aid and kill yourself, people like you fucked this country up for the last eight years. Time to move on. I really hate you people!
You got that right! And look at these nuts now with Obama in office. They couldn't get their shit together for eight years and now they sabotage anything his office tries. I am not sure how this is going to end up but at least he's educated and not faith driven or greedy-the two things their party seems to be consistent with not matter what kook is in power! Reagan got what was coming to him.
What the hell do any of these comments have to do with this video? Take your shitty conservative views elsewhere. Comment on the subject of this video only.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yes, we do know what they're in to, stuff like, lowering taxes, stoppping the murder of innocent unborn life, saving YOU money, keeping you safe, making sure you have all your rights........nasty republicans, I mean, who would want all of that?
And you Republicans have done such a great job with lowering taxes (for the rich), banning abortion (?) and creating sex ed programs to prevent unwanted pregnancies (?) and pre-natal care and support systems for mothers and children (?) so that abortions will be less common (or is that the liberals with their "socialism"?), ...
lowering everybodys taxes,but an emphasis on buisness owners so they can expand and hire more people,libs wouldnt let us take away the right to kill a person,libs want sex-ed programs,conservatives want abstinence programs,support for mothers and children who cant support themselves(libs gave money to anyone with a hand out,and that detracted from the money that could have been spent on mothers and children)and there is something called adoption,10,000 couples who want children,but cant naturaly
... keeping us safe (3,000 dead on 9/11 due to Bush ignoring warnings, 4,250 dead 30,000+ wounded soldiers due to a war, based on false and manipulated intelligence, "planned" and executed with extreme partisanship/ideology but no competence or expertise, and the thousands who've died from environmental and consumer product problems due to total disregard to protecting Americans with regulations, none of them count...for some reason),
what warnings? if there were any, the libs would have called bush crazy. many dead service men and women, who voluntarily gave their lives to liberate iraq, and preserve freedom in America, libs who over-regulate everything, so that buisness men are more worried about profit, than product(look at American cars)
lol "liberate" Iraq. Yeah I guess that's why oil companies now are trying to privatize Iraq oil and use it for themselves. Also would requiring cars to have good safety standards be considered "over regulating" and if so then I kinda enjoy having car manufactures "over-regulated" to have seat belts and side airbags.
Toyota has better saftey than any American car, better quality and gas mileage overall, and they don't work under unions! car manufacturers regulatung is different than govt. regulations too, if car manus. want more buyers, they make the car safer there is no problem with CM regulating stuff, thats their buisness. govt regulations, tend to go overboard
The reason companies like Ford failed isn't because they were Unionized it's because they produced shit cars no one wanted while better cars were made overseas. Hell even Toyota has unions.
Govt regulations are nothing compared to regulations in other countries which shockingly seem to produce better cars.
UAW, forces car companies to pay higher salaries and work the workers less, in Japan, there may be unions, but they don't force toyota/ honda/ etc... to do what the UAW forces. if companies were allowed to regulate themselves, they would work the workers hard but fair, and produce quality products, like american cars used to be BEFORE UAW. the regulations in other countries don't force payment/ time worked regulations on companies, only saftey/ other stuff
UAW has nothing to do with the crap quality cars being produced by Ford GM etc. France makes good quality cars (in that they don't break down, have good millage etc. ) and there unions are leaps and bounds beyond ours.
The main culprit isn't unions its the companies making bad cars.
companies making bad cars because of....what? it's funny back when American cars were good, the unions were almost non-exisistent, then at the same time union power went up, quality went waaayyy down.
The trend was to make "good" (good in that they last longer) cars but companies found it was better to make cars bad so they break down and people get new ones. (look at Oldsmobile).
"Quality" also went down because safety standards went up (crumple zones etc.) which made the car safer but also made parts less interchangeable and harder to fix the car.
In fact in most other countries car quality goes up when unions get better.
the car companies produce crappy cars because the union forces certain time limits on each day ask any decent working person from before 1978 such as my dad who was"end of the line"inspector at Frieghtliner co.before 78 the unions were relativley small at freightliner and there was almost no problems with trucks that rolled off the assembly lines then unions came in and demanded manditory coffee breaks.MANDITORY that means you HAVE to take the break like it or not.laziness being promoted
... and protecting all of our rights (you have to be fucking joking..are you seriously this ignorant and just plain stupid? for fuck's sake, the right to bear arms and to not quarter troops are the only parts of the Bill of Rights that asshole Bush didn't violate!). Fucking moron.
tell me which rights Bush violated? the tapping of phone calls was suspected terrorists OVERSEAS, and I thougt you just said bush was ignoring warnings? now you are bashing him for investigating what might have been another terror attack?
I kinda thought we had a right to privacy in our constitution? Also wiretapping isn't exclusively overseas it's everywhere and it's as close to an Orwellian future as it gets to be honest.
we do, but it's also you liberals accusing Bush of not doing anything about 9/11, because he supposedly knew about it, before it happened.....if I'm suspected of being a terrorist, and the govt. has sources, and the worst they do is tap my phone....I wouldn't care, I have nothing to hide, if they came into my house(which didn't happen under bush) w/o a warrent, then i'd be mad
Well I'm guessing the warrentless wire tapping (what the patriot act did) is cool too. We're not saying Bush didn't do anything, it's just what he did was consecutively wrong.
I mean invade Iraq? Even if they had WMDs what would be the point? Why didn't we invade North Korea or Iran or even the Soviet Union for that matter?
if there is a suspected terrorist that the govt is watching, and thousands of peoples lives are at stake, there could be no time to go through all the BS of the court system, and hey...if you got nothin to hide, why would you care? the 4th amendment says "unresonable searches" like I said, if 1000's of lives are at stake, that is not an unreasonable search if there is "supported by Oath or affirmation"
the court system is so screwed up as it is, there is almost no justice ever! if you gave evidence to a court that terrorists were going to attack, the court would consider it, unless it was accusation against a muslim, the GOD FORBID they should ever be accused of ANYTHING bad!
did I say kill all in Gitmo? no I said if they're terrorists kill them. if there were any innocents in there and they got out...good, but look at al-nashiri, confessed to killing service men on the USS Cole, and he walks
oh, I almost forgot, American cars are crap, we both can agree on that right? if you want to have a successful buisness, you will build quality products. why would you need GOVT. regulations if you wanted to be successful, you would build quality, now govt. as we all know screws everything up, so why would you want it bigger? you do realize that in the '70s when Japanse cars were crap, the unions were huge, then in the 90s they were reorganized to a fraction of their original size
ok, you're right, we should have left the psychopathic saddam hussein as dictator of Iraq. there is no harm in the mass murder of iraqi citizens right? we were so bad for liberating them, shame on us, they were so foolish as to want to be liberated, shame on the Iraqi people, all hail hussein....
we shouldn't be allies with any oppresive nation, that is why we should get rid of the UN it is BS. and hell..why shouldn't we go in there and fix our mistakes?
so you count it as a dumb idea to have stopped Saddams reign of terror and mass murder? you think it's horrible that the iraqis can now freely vote?
We shouldn't go in because chances are their people would be brainwashed to think their leaders are gods and reject us. Then we'd fuck up their country even more.
When we went into Iraq more people died then under Saddam (reign of terror, mass murder?) and we completely destabilized their country and lead to a civil war.
Hey at least now they can vote....oh wait there's a civil war going on and thier rejecting the new government.
that is what the media would have you believe, Saddam killed 10s of thousands of innocent citizens and the only reason innocents die still is because the muslim men are too cowardly to dress in uniform and disgraceful enough to start a shootout with women and children around.
Civil war....they're winning those freedoms one by one, just like America through civil war ended slavery in America and preserved the union
I think you're over exaggerating with a million people, and if tax dollars go to a worthy cause, such as FREEING A NATION, I'm willing to support that cause. Life, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS don't apply to only Americans, and if you feel that we should have left saddam in power, you go tell that to an iraqi woman who can now vote, or the little girl who can go to school, or the man who is allowed to operate his buisness the way he wants to
um....in case you haven't noticed Iraq is in shambles and spreading freedom to Iraq wasn't worth the effort.
Iraq may be sustained but that effort is pointless for the sole purpose of "SPREADING FREEDOM" when countries that we're allied with still have dictatorships.
In case you haven't noticed our only point in Iraq was honestly just for their oil which will run out anyway in a couple decades.
terror attacks in iraq are down in iraq, and people get to vote and have revolutions, it was worth it. iraq actually has a better economy now than America
you really hate freedom don't you? you think it was a waste to free a country, just because it is small? why syop at big countries though? lets free the world! freedom is a gift from God, and fighting under the Banner of Christ and for the purposes of liberating those countries, we would be just. as Ronald Reagan said,"freedom, is always worth the price"
it is, and I will be the first to admit that Reagan wasn't perfect and made mistakes, but the question stands, why can't we fix our mistakes? what is so horrible about freeing a country? what do you have against freedom, that you don't care if iraq was freed, just because of it's size?
I don't have anything against freedom but what I am against is using force. Violence creates more violence.
When we radicalized the Muslims to fight the USSR, the blowback was 9/11 and when we did the coup in Iran in 1954 the people revolted and implemented the crazy muslim government we know today.
We went in Iraq to find WMDs not to "free" them but when we realized that there weren't any then we used the fact that we "freed" them (and created a civil war) as a justification.
you have a good dream of no violence, but it will never happen, because America is never the agressor, it is always someone else. the truth is, the world is full of sin, and as long as there are those who don't follow Christ, there will be killing
you think America was the agressor in those wars? I gues you think we picked a fight with the japs and hitler too...we had troops stationed in S. vietnam to prevent communist invasion, happened anyway. and lets not forget the fact that saddam was helping al-quada(WTC, 9/11) and everyone, including GB and Bill clinton thought Iraq had nukes
there was literally no connection between Saddam and al-qada and in Vietnam we started the Gulf of Tonkin incident by being the first to fire on the Vietnamese boats (and we shouldn't of been there to begin with).
Also even if Iraq did have nukes why invade them? We didn't invade Iran, or North Korea when they got nukes.
really, saddam had no connection with al-qada? that must be why the iraqi govt. payed #2 in command of al-qada,Ayman al-Zawahiri, $300,000. or why Iraq provided training to al Qada members in the areas of poisons and gases and making conventional bombs. right? no connection......
Well I see all this information is all true and cited and verifiable and in no way looks like a GOP talking point.....seriously this isn't listed anywhere.
it's funny you should call it a liberal talking point because I got the vietnam info from the 2008 Encarta encyclopedia. which is micro soft, which last time I checked, not GOP.
of course saddam wasn't a member of al-qaida, but he WAS the leader of iraq when AQ was being funded by iraqi govt. right? there is no way around it. if president bush or Obama or even their administrations were corrupt enough to fund white power or any other radical group, I would blame el numero uno for not having better control of his workers. wouldn't you? I mean if 300k is missing here or more or less there, and it's dissapearing, he should at least do investigation into where its going
you are either dumb, american, plain stupid or a mix of it all... Saddam funded your family as well. "saddam funded al-qaida" LOL, ignorant prick, that's what you are.
you've got the whole thing bass ackwards my friend, let me give you a history lesson. LBJ ordered the U.S. Navy to conduct surveillance missions along the North Vietnamese coast, and on August 2, 1964, North Vietnamese coastal gunboats fired on the destroyer USS Maddox. though the war had not started there, as early as '61 the NLF had been training guerilla fighters and had been attacking ARVN military forces. this caused the US to send reinforcements
CONT... caused US to bomb known NLF and NVA training facilities and parts of the Ho Chi Min trail, also caused US spying in the gulf of tonkin, where as I said previously, NVA gunboats fired FIRST on the USS Maddox
Funny because a 2005 report from the NSA explicitly stated the Maddox started firing on the boats. It fired as a "warning shot" and never reported this to the Johnson Administration.
note I got this directly from the nsa website soooo there goes your little history lesson.
"Skunks, Bogies, Silent Hounds, and the Flying Fish: The Gulf of Tonkin Mystery, 2-4 August 1964" page 17.
according to this article, Maddox did fire first, but did you happen to read that NVA commanders SENT the attack command to the boats, and the boats, as the article put it "chased" the maddox. I'm not sure, but this could be considered aggressive right? and still you completley disregard the fact that this was the start of the official war, the "war" itself had begun earlier when the NLF started attacking ARVN, if you have any probs w/that,tell it to encarta
"Hmmm a strange ship from a powerful foreign country unauthorized in MY water? No clearly I should just let it go."
In fact chasing it isn't even aggressive in the slightest it's on foreign waters and in a different country.
I'm using the incident because that's when it became a full blown war and the US really got involved. Even if the Veitcong attacked it's none of our businesses what happens in other countries.
We honestly didn't have any right to intervene in a foreign civil war.
ah, you do make a good point here, and it would be pertinent, if S. vietnam had not asked for US help, and if there were no open hostile conflicts between north vietnam and US/south vietnam forces before the gulf of tonkin incident
am I in the GOVT? why in the heck should I know why we didn't get rid of NK and Irans nukes yet, I say we should, but people in govt. are too dumb to do anything about it, they still think it is possible to disarm these countries by "peace talks" and sending money
you're serious? you think Bush only went in after oil? why would he do that when he is sitting on billions of barrels in ANWR, and off the coast. there is no logical reason to go in after oil, and he didn't, if you haven't noticed, Iraqis still control their own oil fields
When you consider the vast amounts of Oil it has it's not that ridiculous.
Actually going back to what I said earlier, US companies are trying to privatize (as in take for themselves and away from Iraq) Iraqi oil but the Iraq congress has been resisting.
well if Bush was THAT interseted in oil, he would be taking ALL sources now wouldn't he? he would be trying to steal from Iraq and he would have opened up drilling in ANWR. now what you said about America privatizing iraqi oil, that is absurd, the only comapny we have in Iraq is Freedom and Associates(U.S. military and red cross....)
all I can say is, you really take your freedom for granted and, based on what you said earlier, couldn't care less now that the Iraqis are free, it's sad that you will disrespect the Americans who have given their lives for operation Iraqi freedom
thats not the GOVT. though, that is private companies, they have their rights to see if the Iraqis want to sell them the oil. although with regulations going up the govt. will soon own the companies
Widely distributed reports have noted in January 1968, Obama was registered as a Muslim at Jakartas Roman Catholic Franciscus Assisi Primary School under the name Barry Soetoro. He was listed as an Indonesian citizen whose stepfather, listed on school documents as L Soetoro Ma, worked for the topography department of the Indonesian Army.
Dude, seriously, your (sic) a retarded, Muslim, Socialist, terrorist, devil worshipper. I know this is true, because it has been widely reported and because I saw it on YouTube. THIS IS THE SHOCKING REPLY I WANT U TO SEE!!!!!!
Obama was quite religious in Islam Contemporaries, records dispute campaign claim that he was never practicing Muslim By Aaron Klein, JERUSALEM Was Sen. Barack Obama a Muslim? Did he ever practice Islam? The presidential candidate officially rejects the claims, but the issue of Obamas personal faith has re-emerged amid conflicting accounts of his enrollment as a Muslim during elementary school in Indonesia, the worlds most populous Muslim nation.
More and more videos going up everyday on youtube (enter the titles in youtube serach bar to see for yourself) showing the american people getting sick of Obama
ObaMessiah Gets Pinned by Dennis Miller
Obama Attacks Christians, Doesn'tBelieve inThe New Testament
Leftist Obama Distorts the Bible, Attacks Christians
Obama Mocking the Bible
AND REALLY SEE THIS ONE = Shocking Video Obama doesn't want U to see!!
phoenixhammerof"truth"... How did the election work out for you? No worries, January of 2017 there will be another shot - Please, run with Palin!
Until then, you can see how this generation of students reacted if you search "Obama Victory University of Washington" - what's amazing is that they sang the Star Spangled Banner" with only ONE flag - they did not need a truck load shipped in! You will see what genuine patriotism looks like if you dare to watch - then again, don't bother!
Ohhh... what a shock! When I went to: phoenixhammerof"truth" it said that "This account is closed"... I guess that the RNC stopped paying people to post fat lies - they will stick with their usual cast of right-wing-nut radio pawns for awhile... until they start blaming the depression on Obama.
I miss Night Flight. Back in the day we used to get so trashed and sit up all night watching this show. Kids today have no idea what they're missing. Ah, life before the NeoCons was so much better. :)
right, because the conservative curve lacks any sense of humor whatsoever. didn't i already own the fuck out of you and your Reagan loving ass on another video thread? go jerk off to milton friedman now.
Milton Friedman rules. Anyways, lots of these guys like friedman and reagan and even goldwater would probably be considered moderates, even Buckley, today. Im classically conservative but i find humor in this.
Reagan was the foundation of what is the current maniacal neo-con movement in the form of Cheney, Robert Gates etc... if you think these guys are moderate, you don't realize just how far right you actually are. The current economic crisis is the manifestation of Friedmanism and an indictment of its ultimate failure.. the sad thing is that they're gonna stick to it and just make the problems worse bailing out the creditors and letting the people pay and suffer. I think even Friedman would be sad.
Ron and Nancy Reagan. Two evil ignorant old people in the White House.
Ronald Reagan. One of the worst presidents ever. He came into power because of the KKK Christian Reich. And he funded Osama Bin Laden and funded and supported Saddam Hussein.
An evil man and disgusting bigoted senile horrible president who raised the spending budget to massive heights. Horrible president, horrible man, a horrible human being. No wonder the Nazis at Fox "News" & the rednecks in the South like him.
Hmm - I could say something. But you are so blinded by your own ignorance and bias that you wouldn't even listen. Go get em - because we all know that when the left comes into power we will live in utopia. Of course if they fail to correct our current problems people like you will still blame the republicans. But to be honest - it is both parties fault - they are both liars, thieves, and only want whats best for themselves.
For example, by my using the words homeland security, computers at homeland automatically now focus on this web site, and with back doors in Microsoft IP addresses from each poster now are recorded, who says what, when, and best of all from which ISP -- router -- node and then home address. ^_^ Libraries computer terminals are also on these monitoring programs due to terrorists using picture files to pass messages so even there now anyone seated at a terminal are video taped.
Drug abuse has a wide range of definitions related to taking a psychoactive drug or performance enhancing drug for a non-therapeutic or non-medical effect. All of these definitions imply a negative judgement of the drug use in question. Some of the drugs most often associated with this term include alcohol, amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, methaqualone,
The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance. Socrates - R.I.P Mr. President there are many who remember you correctly and will always stand like lamp lights to burn away the shadow of lies they cast towards you
Saudi Arabia has also come under fire for its oppression of religious and political minorities, torture of prisoners, and attitude toward foreign expatriates, homosexuality, and women. Although major human rights groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have repeatedly expressed concern about the states of human rights in Saudi Arabia, the kingdom denies that any human rights abuses take place.
to see why the 80s were a push to protect us from the east lets lok at some facts..SAUDI CRIMES Human rights in Saudi Arabia are based on sharia religious laws under rule of the Saudi royal family. Many freedoms as described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights do not exist; it is alleged that capital punishment and other penalties are often given to suspected criminals without due process.
To all you little commies out there. Reagan was one of the best Presidents of our history. With that said. Ya this video was VERY funny and creative! Even us consevatives have a sense of humor and can laugh at a good joke.
fistofborg 3 weeks ago
That is Good Stuff! Way better than the other crap i got searching irony...
AlfieRomero00 1 month ago
Rock ON, "zamaz99".....i was in my 20s during the Rayguns regime. Even evil ol' ex-President Nixon was critical of what Rayguns was doing to the country. Nixon predicted that, if Rayguns had his way, by the time the 21st century was 10 years old, we'd be screwed! Guess he was right. BUT THERE IS ALWAYS HOPE!!!!!
booksforlovers 5 months ago
Awesome
djronniebruno 7 months ago
You failed, Reagan! I laugh at you and your braindead wife.
AtheistPanic 8 months ago
oh i see this is edited together
MichaelHansenFUN 9 months ago
An early Pre-Youtube Poop?
chada75 10 months ago 2
Fuck off hippies.
seary6579 11 months ago
Awwwh. This made me actually almost miss the 80's.
thewhyblock 11 months ago 3
reagan was the worst president he fucked our economy up .always getting on tv threating to blow the world up starting wwlll .telling other countries that we got more weapons then everyone else .i sure am glad it's not the 80s anymore.and all the stupid people saying that the 80s were better than today .it's always been a fucked up nation from the start
nevetsnamffoc 1 year ago
This is funnier than Toilet Paper strung out of your bosses ass as he is leaving the Mens Room. We're losing our freedoms to make jokes like this. SNL has become way to PC with politicians and goes to far with the general public. Fuck them sellout motha fuckas
coptersoisoi 1 year ago
This is my new favorite YT vid!!! Thanks for this gem!!!
phemohilia 1 year ago
Me marijuana showed how evil and disgusting the world is. Strange.
VitoPossilipo 1 year ago
As a conservative, let me say that I never listened to Reagan when it came to drugs...not... that I would know anything about such things...
WestVirginiaRebel 1 year ago
Does anyone know the name of and where I can find on youtube or anywhere a classic short film shown on night flight about a cafeteria worker who goes nuts due to the monotony of her life. She keeps saying tater tomato as she serves the customers. Hope to find it on you tube so funny! thanks for any help
hellonyhello 1 year ago
My brain is so confused
EmmaLeeHD 1 year ago
PS to any one who thinks the rich did not benefit from worldwide drug trade, making legal substances illegel (LSD, pot, etc) and that there are whole industries that were founded on outlawing or CONTROLLING drug trade (define "drug" while your at it, pill-poppers and Barney Gumbles of the world) please just jump in a lake. ;)
5winston 1 year ago
this is funny, but the real message of the "spoof" was on target, drug trafficking increased during the Reagan years, police, military, HMOs made a bundle off of peoples drug use, and treatment was thrown out the window. God bless Night Flight, just when I thought my childhood was barren of real commentary, unstained by corporate BS, I realized I was raised with some pretty cool shit.
5winston 1 year ago
@5winston yeah I bet the drug trafficing increased, these clowns were behind it. Look up Barry Seal. The CIA is doing it right now, running all the opium they can out of Afghanistan, selling it in Russia and even here to our own people.
ProfessorCP 1 year ago
@mogadoremike HA!
happyluckyfunbus 1 year ago
@zamaz99 HA!
happyluckyfunbus 1 year ago
brilliant
jeffscully 1 year ago
Could you imagaine doing something like this on TV now? No way. The do gooder, politically correct assheads would have a shit fit.
lemonpickle56 2 years ago
bullshit. family guy does that sorta shit all the time
jacksager924 2 years ago
I spent much of the Reagan years stoned off my ass. I'm glad I didn't see this vid back then; I would have died from the lulz.
suzbailey23 2 years ago
Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th century and I think this vid is fantastic! We always loved Night Flight and was sorry to see it go. We had great hope for cable TV, but most of it is crap.
How is it that the old USA, Nostalgia Channel, TV land etc reran all sorts of great old bizzare stuff when there were only a few cable channels, but now that there are 100's of them there's almost nothing original to be found.
And "Arts and Entertainment" runs spook shows. Amazing.
LWall2000 2 years ago
Nancy and I are hooked on heroin. LMFAO.
Nohname1 2 years ago 3
See? Even Nancy liked it; it was good for her glaucoma. God her eyes freak me out.
HailDarkened 2 years ago 5
Her entire face looks like a Halloween mask.
EndlessChris 2 years ago
The real American traitors are right there in the US Neutral.
gmsmfan 2 years ago
Republican or Democratic, it well never make a change 2 this world!!!What well is if we all stop bitching about who's RIGHT AND WHO"S WRONG!and work on the task at hand!thats what gets things done.
The founding fathers and mothers did not win a war agents british witch ruled the world for over200 years by bitching about WHO'S RIGHT AND WHO'S WRONG!! now did they?!
HippieLandTV 2 years ago
IS there any way I can get NIGHT FLIGHT on DVD?? I wish this show was available on DVD sets.
dogeymon83 2 years ago 2
that was awesome. wish it was real
Josephdorf03 2 years ago
The end is near July 15th you will have no choice!
Fuck youtube
abba149 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The end is near July 15th you will have no choice!
Fuck youtube
abba149 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Reagan made me a staunch liberal at age 14. Gawd how I hated that evil bastard. He helped push this country towards total corporate control. The rich got richer, the poor got poorer, and the middle class started getting screwed when he became president. Republicans are so harmful to this country. And, I agree with the person who said we never expected that anyone could top this moron in stupidity. Yet, we got stuck with Bush Jr. Ugh! Never again, let's hope.
zamaz99 2 years ago 27
Here here, The dentured cowboy drove a wedge right into the heart of the middle of America that still exists to this day. He was dead set against raising income taxes but he raised every other tax he could think of and we are still paying today. Just search for Reagan and tax increases. This guy was the death of the United States as we used to know it.
kshelton 2 years ago 3
Martin Luther King was a republican. AS were virtually all black people in his time. Because the Republican Party has a long history of actually doing things for minorities and the poor.
Do you ever stop to think that democratic leaders have spent billions and billions on fighting poverty for the last 30 to 40 years. Why haven't things ever gotten better?
dogeymon83 2 years ago
Zamaz99, you are not a staunch liberal. Tip O'Neil was a staunch liberal. You are a left-wing extremist and you belonged in Nicaragua. A true liberal would oppose Soviet Communism. I was in the U.S. Army hoping that I would find American traitors in Central America. My unit conducted manuevers in Honduras in 1985. I wish I met you there, zamaz99. I really do.
Neutraleyes66 2 years ago
Oooh, Neutraleye66, I'm so scared! Lol. Big tough guy, huh? ... Sorry about your small penis.
zamaz99 2 years ago
I have to admit when I was younger and naive, I liked Reagan. It was only until I was 15 and moved to the Bay Area in '84 and saw the reality of what was going on. I started questioning things and reading more about the truth was then I was enlightened and became a staunch lefty!
jpx08 2 years ago
I still have a funny and bad feeling Palin might get it in 2012. I hope I am wrong but I really think Obama is getting swiftboated times a thousand right now.
jpx08 2 years ago
Pailin?? you're on crack bro. If anything the only republican worth a flying fuck is Ron Paul, and even he's got no shot. Do me a favor and don't watch TV all they are doing is what they do to any President when he goes against the monster we call big business
pedrokeller 2 years ago 2
I live in Keller. Are you the guy with the Ron Paul sticker on Farmington. He is 100% fake! The only real thing about Ron Paul is hes REAL CRAZY!
Balfadaz 2 years ago
No... I'm not that guy.. Keller, Texas?? I've been there on business. Nice little town.
pedrokeller 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@zamaz99 your a fucking idiot, Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th century!!
mogadoremike 1 year ago
@zamaz99 "how I hated that evil bastard." Oh please, lighten' up will ya. You sound like that guy in "Stripes'... Francis... who always needed to chill. So Francis, did you ever hear that saying about the 'Business of America being business.' It dates all the way back to Calvin Coolidge in 1925. Liberals aren't very well read, nor do they practice the compassion they're forever preaching. So you 'hated' Reagan? Did you wish for his death in a plane crash like that loser recently said of Palin?
gore53 1 year ago
Comment removed
jfrockon 1 year ago
@zamaz99 And now we have the monkey Socialist named Obama.... are you now a happy faggot?
jfrockon 1 year ago
@jfrockon this country needs to be ethnically cleansed of people like you. you are the reason we are hated throughout the world and continue to be the object of terrorism.
facewrecker5 1 year ago
@facewrecker5
Of course a liberal would want to ethnically cleanse someone.
PlaystFreak 1 year ago
@PlaystFreak if that is their wish, liberals are free to do so. it would be fun to have sex with your face till you barf jizz on yourself. can i do that?
facewrecker5 1 year ago
@facewrecker5
Well, contrary to popular belief, nobody can freely commit genocide whether they are a Conservative or a Liberal.
PlaystFreak 1 year ago
@zamaz99 It is obvious you are a drug user and your brain cells are damaged. The best thing you could do is commit suicide.
rlwieneke 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zamaz99 One more thing, Fuck Obama.
rlwieneke 1 year ago
@zamaz99 I couldn't have said it any better zamaz.
bellsboy 6 months ago
nancy looks fucked up, lol
Tarikatlar 2 years ago 4
lol-raise your hand if you don't need drugs to be dopey
theebadnun 2 years ago 13
Hey Re-pubic-conserv, you are complete freak. I went to your channel. Obama is in office..drink some kool aid and kill yourself, people like you fucked this country up for the last eight years. Time to move on. I really hate you people!
cassandracollins 2 years ago 4
These two were the beginning of the end for the US. Who thought someone as self centered and retarded as Bush could top these two kooks.
cassandracollins 2 years ago
I thought the same about Nixon and along came Reagan. So Bush follows him. Never ending psycho-cycle.
Balfadaz 2 years ago
You got that right! And look at these nuts now with Obama in office. They couldn't get their shit together for eight years and now they sabotage anything his office tries. I am not sure how this is going to end up but at least he's educated and not faith driven or greedy-the two things their party seems to be consistent with not matter what kook is in power! Reagan got what was coming to him.
cassandracollins 2 years ago
What the hell do any of these comments have to do with this video? Take your shitty conservative views elsewhere. Comment on the subject of this video only.
cassandracollins 2 years ago
Great clip. How i miss Night Flight...
hleon768 3 years ago
This is so funny, I almost peed in my pants!
onlygunter 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow......this was pretty gay
RepubConserv 3 years ago
Pretty much anything involving Ronnie is gay. He was a Republican politician, after all, and we know what kind of stuff they're into...
BrendanM4458 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes, we do know what they're in to, stuff like, lowering taxes, stoppping the murder of innocent unborn life, saving YOU money, keeping you safe, making sure you have all your rights........nasty republicans, I mean, who would want all of that?
RepubConserv 3 years ago
And you Republicans have done such a great job with lowering taxes (for the rich), banning abortion (?) and creating sex ed programs to prevent unwanted pregnancies (?) and pre-natal care and support systems for mothers and children (?) so that abortions will be less common (or is that the liberals with their "socialism"?), ...
BrendanM4458 2 years ago
lowering everybodys taxes,but an emphasis on buisness owners so they can expand and hire more people,libs wouldnt let us take away the right to kill a person,libs want sex-ed programs,conservatives want abstinence programs,support for mothers and children who cant support themselves(libs gave money to anyone with a hand out,and that detracted from the money that could have been spent on mothers and children)and there is something called adoption,10,000 couples who want children,but cant naturaly
RepubConserv 2 years ago
... keeping us safe (3,000 dead on 9/11 due to Bush ignoring warnings, 4,250 dead 30,000+ wounded soldiers due to a war, based on false and manipulated intelligence, "planned" and executed with extreme partisanship/ideology but no competence or expertise, and the thousands who've died from environmental and consumer product problems due to total disregard to protecting Americans with regulations, none of them count...for some reason),
BrendanM4458 2 years ago
what warnings? if there were any, the libs would have called bush crazy. many dead service men and women, who voluntarily gave their lives to liberate iraq, and preserve freedom in America, libs who over-regulate everything, so that buisness men are more worried about profit, than product(look at American cars)
RepubConserv 2 years ago
lol "liberate" Iraq. Yeah I guess that's why oil companies now are trying to privatize Iraq oil and use it for themselves. Also would requiring cars to have good safety standards be considered "over regulating" and if so then I kinda enjoy having car manufactures "over-regulated" to have seat belts and side airbags.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
Toyota has better saftey than any American car, better quality and gas mileage overall, and they don't work under unions! car manufacturers regulatung is different than govt. regulations too, if car manus. want more buyers, they make the car safer there is no problem with CM regulating stuff, thats their buisness. govt regulations, tend to go overboard
RepubConserv 2 years ago
The reason companies like Ford failed isn't because they were Unionized it's because they produced shit cars no one wanted while better cars were made overseas. Hell even Toyota has unions.
Govt regulations are nothing compared to regulations in other countries which shockingly seem to produce better cars.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
UAW, forces car companies to pay higher salaries and work the workers less, in Japan, there may be unions, but they don't force toyota/ honda/ etc... to do what the UAW forces. if companies were allowed to regulate themselves, they would work the workers hard but fair, and produce quality products, like american cars used to be BEFORE UAW. the regulations in other countries don't force payment/ time worked regulations on companies, only saftey/ other stuff
RepubConserv 2 years ago
UAW has nothing to do with the crap quality cars being produced by Ford GM etc. France makes good quality cars (in that they don't break down, have good millage etc. ) and there unions are leaps and bounds beyond ours.
The main culprit isn't unions its the companies making bad cars.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
companies making bad cars because of....what? it's funny back when American cars were good, the unions were almost non-exisistent, then at the same time union power went up, quality went waaayyy down.
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Not even remotly.
The trend was to make "good" (good in that they last longer) cars but companies found it was better to make cars bad so they break down and people get new ones. (look at Oldsmobile).
"Quality" also went down because safety standards went up (crumple zones etc.) which made the car safer but also made parts less interchangeable and harder to fix the car.
In fact in most other countries car quality goes up when unions get better.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
the car companies produce crappy cars because the union forces certain time limits on each day ask any decent working person from before 1978 such as my dad who was"end of the line"inspector at Frieghtliner co.before 78 the unions were relativley small at freightliner and there was almost no problems with trucks that rolled off the assembly lines then unions came in and demanded manditory coffee breaks.MANDITORY that means you HAVE to take the break like it or not.laziness being promoted
RepubConserv 2 years ago
privatising is not a bad thing, you can always go to another seller, it's nationalizing that is dangerous, you are forced to buy from one supplier
RepubConserv 2 years ago
... and protecting all of our rights (you have to be fucking joking..are you seriously this ignorant and just plain stupid? for fuck's sake, the right to bear arms and to not quarter troops are the only parts of the Bill of Rights that asshole Bush didn't violate!). Fucking moron.
BrendanM4458 2 years ago
tell me which rights Bush violated? the tapping of phone calls was suspected terrorists OVERSEAS, and I thougt you just said bush was ignoring warnings? now you are bashing him for investigating what might have been another terror attack?
RepubConserv 2 years ago
I kinda thought we had a right to privacy in our constitution? Also wiretapping isn't exclusively overseas it's everywhere and it's as close to an Orwellian future as it gets to be honest.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
we do, but it's also you liberals accusing Bush of not doing anything about 9/11, because he supposedly knew about it, before it happened.....if I'm suspected of being a terrorist, and the govt. has sources, and the worst they do is tap my phone....I wouldn't care, I have nothing to hide, if they came into my house(which didn't happen under bush) w/o a warrent, then i'd be mad
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Well I'm guessing the warrentless wire tapping (what the patriot act did) is cool too. We're not saying Bush didn't do anything, it's just what he did was consecutively wrong.
I mean invade Iraq? Even if they had WMDs what would be the point? Why didn't we invade North Korea or Iran or even the Soviet Union for that matter?
KidsTrax 2 years ago
if there is a suspected terrorist that the govt is watching, and thousands of peoples lives are at stake, there could be no time to go through all the BS of the court system, and hey...if you got nothin to hide, why would you care? the 4th amendment says "unresonable searches" like I said, if 1000's of lives are at stake, that is not an unreasonable search if there is "supported by Oath or affirmation"
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Yeah fuck the BS of the "court system" who needs a honest court when you can just use blank accusations.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
the court system is so screwed up as it is, there is almost no justice ever! if you gave evidence to a court that terrorists were going to attack, the court would consider it, unless it was accusation against a muslim, the GOD FORBID they should ever be accused of ANYTHING bad!
RepubConserv 2 years ago
...............yeah lets just through them in to Gitmo because they might be terrorists.
It's not like there were EVER any INNOCENT people there.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
if they're terrorists, I don't want them in gitmo, I want them dead, that is the only way libs cant let them back into society
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Lol yeah kill all those in gitmo despite the fact a bunch of them have been proven innocent and released.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
did I say kill all in Gitmo? no I said if they're terrorists kill them. if there were any innocents in there and they got out...good, but look at al-nashiri, confessed to killing service men on the USS Cole, and he walks
RepubConserv 2 years ago
oh, I almost forgot, American cars are crap, we both can agree on that right? if you want to have a successful buisness, you will build quality products. why would you need GOVT. regulations if you wanted to be successful, you would build quality, now govt. as we all know screws everything up, so why would you want it bigger? you do realize that in the '70s when Japanse cars were crap, the unions were huge, then in the 90s they were reorganized to a fraction of their original size
RepubConserv 2 years ago
You do realize that unions in Japan are the exact opposite of what you said. There are more union members today then in the 70s.......
KidsTrax 2 years ago
ok, you're right, we should have left the psychopathic saddam hussein as dictator of Iraq. there is no harm in the mass murder of iraqi citizens right? we were so bad for liberating them, shame on us, they were so foolish as to want to be liberated, shame on the Iraqi people, all hail hussein....
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Oh ok lets just go in and free up Egypt, North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe or any other dictatorship the US installed in the 80s.
I mean gosh all those dictators are just so bad....oh wait some of them are our allies, well golly gee this is just one hell of a moral dilemma.
What Saddam did was bad but it doesn't give us some sort of moral high ground to come in and "free" the country.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
we shouldn't be allies with any oppresive nation, that is why we should get rid of the UN it is BS. and hell..why shouldn't we go in there and fix our mistakes?
so you count it as a dumb idea to have stopped Saddams reign of terror and mass murder? you think it's horrible that the iraqis can now freely vote?
are you a christian?
RepubConserv 2 years ago
We shouldn't go in because chances are their people would be brainwashed to think their leaders are gods and reject us. Then we'd fuck up their country even more.
When we went into Iraq more people died then under Saddam (reign of terror, mass murder?) and we completely destabilized their country and lead to a civil war.
Hey at least now they can vote....oh wait there's a civil war going on and thier rejecting the new government.
Look at Mr. Christian now.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
that is what the media would have you believe, Saddam killed 10s of thousands of innocent citizens and the only reason innocents die still is because the muslim men are too cowardly to dress in uniform and disgraceful enough to start a shootout with women and children around.
Civil war....they're winning those freedoms one by one, just like America through civil war ended slavery in America and preserved the union
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Congrats only a million people had to die and billions of tax dollars wasted so that a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 can be free.
Fantastic.
Go spread more freedom America.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
I think you're over exaggerating with a million people, and if tax dollars go to a worthy cause, such as FREEING A NATION, I'm willing to support that cause. Life, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS don't apply to only Americans, and if you feel that we should have left saddam in power, you go tell that to an iraqi woman who can now vote, or the little girl who can go to school, or the man who is allowed to operate his buisness the way he wants to
RepubConserv 2 years ago
um....in case you haven't noticed Iraq is in shambles and spreading freedom to Iraq wasn't worth the effort.
Iraq may be sustained but that effort is pointless for the sole purpose of "SPREADING FREEDOM" when countries that we're allied with still have dictatorships.
In case you haven't noticed our only point in Iraq was honestly just for their oil which will run out anyway in a couple decades.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
terror attacks in iraq are down in iraq, and people get to vote and have revolutions, it was worth it. iraq actually has a better economy now than America
RepubConserv 2 years ago
You do realize that we spent billions and lost thousands of lives just so some random country can be free?
Jesus christ this isn't the soviet union it's a small country. What difference would it make if it was free?
Why don't we free the fuck out of all the dozens of ,other, more relevant countries?
Did this do anything for 9/11? Did this spread peace? No, Iraqis hate us for destroying their country now.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
you really hate freedom don't you? you think it was a waste to free a country, just because it is small? why syop at big countries though? lets free the world! freedom is a gift from God, and fighting under the Banner of Christ and for the purposes of liberating those countries, we would be just. as Ronald Reagan said,"freedom, is always worth the price"
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Bahahahaha that's really funny because Reagan staged a bunch of coups in Latin America and replaced the governments with US friendly dictators.
"freedom, is always worth the price" lol right.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
it is, and I will be the first to admit that Reagan wasn't perfect and made mistakes, but the question stands, why can't we fix our mistakes? what is so horrible about freeing a country? what do you have against freedom, that you don't care if iraq was freed, just because of it's size?
RepubConserv 2 years ago
I don't have anything against freedom but what I am against is using force. Violence creates more violence.
When we radicalized the Muslims to fight the USSR, the blowback was 9/11 and when we did the coup in Iran in 1954 the people revolted and implemented the crazy muslim government we know today.
We went in Iraq to find WMDs not to "free" them but when we realized that there weren't any then we used the fact that we "freed" them (and created a civil war) as a justification.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
you have a good dream of no violence, but it will never happen, because America is never the agressor, it is always someone else. the truth is, the world is full of sin, and as long as there are those who don't follow Christ, there will be killing
RepubConserv 2 years ago
America was the aggressor in Vietnam and the Iraq War, and your honestly an idiot for thinking we're never the aggressor.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
you think America was the agressor in those wars? I gues you think we picked a fight with the japs and hitler too...we had troops stationed in S. vietnam to prevent communist invasion, happened anyway. and lets not forget the fact that saddam was helping al-quada(WTC, 9/11) and everyone, including GB and Bill clinton thought Iraq had nukes
RepubConserv 2 years ago
there was literally no connection between Saddam and al-qada and in Vietnam we started the Gulf of Tonkin incident by being the first to fire on the Vietnamese boats (and we shouldn't of been there to begin with).
Also even if Iraq did have nukes why invade them? We didn't invade Iran, or North Korea when they got nukes.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
really, saddam had no connection with al-qada? that must be why the iraqi govt. payed #2 in command of al-qada,Ayman al-Zawahiri, $300,000. or why Iraq provided training to al Qada members in the areas of poisons and gases and making conventional bombs. right? no connection......
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Well I see all this information is all true and cited and verifiable and in no way looks like a GOP talking point.....seriously this isn't listed anywhere.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
it's funny you should call it a liberal talking point because I got the vietnam info from the 2008 Encarta encyclopedia. which is micro soft, which last time I checked, not GOP.
RepubConserv 2 years ago
I'm talking about saddam and al-quada.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
of course saddam wasn't a member of al-qaida, but he WAS the leader of iraq when AQ was being funded by iraqi govt. right? there is no way around it. if president bush or Obama or even their administrations were corrupt enough to fund white power or any other radical group, I would blame el numero uno for not having better control of his workers. wouldn't you? I mean if 300k is missing here or more or less there, and it's dissapearing, he should at least do investigation into where its going
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Theres has never been any official evidence to ever link Al-quada and Iraq ever. No government funding, no nothing.
I honestly want to see a citation that ever expressed any kind of connection of Iraq and Al-qaeda.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
sent you the link
RepubConserv 2 years ago
you are either dumb, american, plain stupid or a mix of it all... Saddam funded your family as well. "saddam funded al-qaida" LOL, ignorant prick, that's what you are.
Tarikatlar 2 years ago
You're a stupid ignorant shit.
charterviewer 2 years ago
you've got the whole thing bass ackwards my friend, let me give you a history lesson. LBJ ordered the U.S. Navy to conduct surveillance missions along the North Vietnamese coast, and on August 2, 1964, North Vietnamese coastal gunboats fired on the destroyer USS Maddox. though the war had not started there, as early as '61 the NLF had been training guerilla fighters and had been attacking ARVN military forces. this caused the US to send reinforcements
CONT...
RepubConserv 2 years ago
CONT... caused US to bomb known NLF and NVA training facilities and parts of the Ho Chi Min trail, also caused US spying in the gulf of tonkin, where as I said previously, NVA gunboats fired FIRST on the USS Maddox
RepubConserv 2 years ago
Funny because a 2005 report from the NSA explicitly stated the Maddox started firing on the boats. It fired as a "warning shot" and never reported this to the Johnson Administration.
note I got this directly from the nsa website soooo there goes your little history lesson.
"Skunks, Bogies, Silent Hounds, and the Flying Fish: The Gulf of Tonkin Mystery, 2-4 August 1964" page 17.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
according to this article, Maddox did fire first, but did you happen to read that NVA commanders SENT the attack command to the boats, and the boats, as the article put it "chased" the maddox. I'm not sure, but this could be considered aggressive right? and still you completley disregard the fact that this was the start of the official war, the "war" itself had begun earlier when the NLF started attacking ARVN, if you have any probs w/that,tell it to encarta
RepubConserv 2 years ago
"Hmmm a strange ship from a powerful foreign country unauthorized in MY water? No clearly I should just let it go."
In fact chasing it isn't even aggressive in the slightest it's on foreign waters and in a different country.
I'm using the incident because that's when it became a full blown war and the US really got involved. Even if the Veitcong attacked it's none of our businesses what happens in other countries.
We honestly didn't have any right to intervene in a foreign civil war.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
ah, you do make a good point here, and it would be pertinent, if S. vietnam had not asked for US help, and if there were no open hostile conflicts between north vietnam and US/south vietnam forces before the gulf of tonkin incident
RepubConserv 2 years ago
am I in the GOVT? why in the heck should I know why we didn't get rid of NK and Irans nukes yet, I say we should, but people in govt. are too dumb to do anything about it, they still think it is possible to disarm these countries by "peace talks" and sending money
RepubConserv 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
disarm yourselves, your time as "the ruler" is over. To hell with the united snakes of amerikkka
Tarikatlar 2 years ago
you're serious? you think Bush only went in after oil? why would he do that when he is sitting on billions of barrels in ANWR, and off the coast. there is no logical reason to go in after oil, and he didn't, if you haven't noticed, Iraqis still control their own oil fields
RepubConserv 2 years ago
When you consider the vast amounts of Oil it has it's not that ridiculous.
Actually going back to what I said earlier, US companies are trying to privatize (as in take for themselves and away from Iraq) Iraqi oil but the Iraq congress has been resisting.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
well if Bush was THAT interseted in oil, he would be taking ALL sources now wouldn't he? he would be trying to steal from Iraq and he would have opened up drilling in ANWR. now what you said about America privatizing iraqi oil, that is absurd, the only comapny we have in Iraq is Freedom and Associates(U.S. military and red cross....)
RepubConserv 2 years ago
It's not absurd because it's true.
The "big five" oil companies have been pushing contracts to privatize oil constantly but the Iraq government continually rejects it.
KidsTrax 2 years ago
all I can say is, you really take your freedom for granted and, based on what you said earlier, couldn't care less now that the Iraqis are free, it's sad that you will disrespect the Americans who have given their lives for operation Iraqi freedom
RepubConserv 2 years ago
9/11 - 3000 people died
Iraq War - 654,965 people died
WE WIN
KidsTrax 2 years ago
thats not the GOVT. though, that is private companies, they have their rights to see if the Iraqis want to sell them the oil. although with regulations going up the govt. will soon own the companies
RepubConserv 2 years ago
rot in hell reagan u drug war nazi
libertariananarchist 3 years ago 3
The truth is presented here? Probably. Mature people can handle using drugs. They need to be regulated because some folks SHOULD NOT USE DRUGS.
Skullrik 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Widely distributed reports have noted in January 1968, Obama was registered as a Muslim at Jakartas Roman Catholic Franciscus Assisi Primary School under the name Barry Soetoro. He was listed as an Indonesian citizen whose stepfather, listed on school documents as L Soetoro Ma, worked for the topography department of the Indonesian Army.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Dude, seriously, your (sic) a retarded, Muslim, Socialist, terrorist, devil worshipper. I know this is true, because it has been widely reported and because I saw it on YouTube. THIS IS THE SHOCKING REPLY I WANT U TO SEE!!!!!!
HbombBJJ 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama was quite religious in Islam Contemporaries, records dispute campaign claim that he was never practicing Muslim By Aaron Klein, JERUSALEM Was Sen. Barack Obama a Muslim? Did he ever practice Islam? The presidential candidate officially rejects the claims, but the issue of Obamas personal faith has re-emerged amid conflicting accounts of his enrollment as a Muslim during elementary school in Indonesia, the worlds most populous Muslim nation.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
More and more videos going up everyday on youtube (enter the titles in youtube serach bar to see for yourself) showing the american people getting sick of Obama
ObaMessiah Gets Pinned by Dennis Miller
Obama Attacks Christians, Doesn'tBelieve inThe New Testament
Leftist Obama Distorts the Bible, Attacks Christians
Obama Mocking the Bible
AND REALLY SEE THIS ONE = Shocking Video Obama doesn't want U to see!!
Your going away Mr. Obama. bye bye
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Hey
phoenixhammerof"truth"... How did the election work out for you? No worries, January of 2017 there will be another shot - Please, run with Palin!
Until then, you can see how this generation of students reacted if you search "Obama Victory University of Washington" - what's amazing is that they sang the Star Spangled Banner" with only ONE flag - they did not need a truck load shipped in! You will see what genuine patriotism looks like if you dare to watch - then again, don't bother!
murphicus 3 years ago
Ohhh... what a shock! When I went to: phoenixhammerof"truth" it said that "This account is closed"... I guess that the RNC stopped paying people to post fat lies - they will stick with their usual cast of right-wing-nut radio pawns for awhile... until they start blaming the depression on Obama.
murphicus 3 years ago
I miss Night Flight. Back in the day we used to get so trashed and sit up all night watching this show. Kids today have no idea what they're missing. Ah, life before the NeoCons was so much better. :)
Fretslayer 3 years ago 3
mmmmmmmmm I will have to give that a minus 3 in funny, but on a liberal cruve we can raise that to a 1.
good try firehAhA
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
right, because the conservative curve lacks any sense of humor whatsoever. didn't i already own the fuck out of you and your Reagan loving ass on another video thread? go jerk off to milton friedman now.
ecracker44 3 years ago
Milton Friedman rules. Anyways, lots of these guys like friedman and reagan and even goldwater would probably be considered moderates, even Buckley, today. Im classically conservative but i find humor in this.
BostonMA1979 3 years ago
Reagan was the foundation of what is the current maniacal neo-con movement in the form of Cheney, Robert Gates etc... if you think these guys are moderate, you don't realize just how far right you actually are. The current economic crisis is the manifestation of Friedmanism and an indictment of its ultimate failure.. the sad thing is that they're gonna stick to it and just make the problems worse bailing out the creditors and letting the people pay and suffer. I think even Friedman would be sad.
ecracker44 3 years ago
friedman roles in his grave. the finatial crisis is the product of a rigged market not a free market
libertariananarchist 3 years ago
This is how we knew him. As a great communicator!
DrGull1888 3 years ago 4
Just say yes?! LOL! Love it!
MTCatman 3 years ago
Awesome.
KidsTrax 3 years ago
wtf? i dont get it, is this real?
bikeral01 3 years ago
It's an edit, and the best one ever!
demonedge666 3 years ago
Well he was actually using the CIA to smuggle cocaine into the U.S. as part of the Iran Contra fiasco.
mos619 3 years ago
watch?v=NpXn1SfGp6M Know the Truth!
Koppurointi 3 years ago
Just like George Bush, Ol Ronald is a joke.
EndlessChris 3 years ago
Uhhh... Those guys are a lot of things, but one thing they are NOT is a fucking joke. Check the body counts, son.
planetery 3 years ago
Ron and Nancy Reagan. Two evil ignorant old people in the White House.
Ronald Reagan. One of the worst presidents ever. He came into power because of the KKK Christian Reich. And he funded Osama Bin Laden and funded and supported Saddam Hussein.
An evil man and disgusting bigoted senile horrible president who raised the spending budget to massive heights. Horrible president, horrible man, a horrible human being. No wonder the Nazis at Fox "News" & the rednecks in the South like him.
Satchel334 3 years ago
Hmm - I could say something. But you are so blinded by your own ignorance and bias that you wouldn't even listen. Go get em - because we all know that when the left comes into power we will live in utopia. Of course if they fail to correct our current problems people like you will still blame the republicans. But to be honest - it is both parties fault - they are both liars, thieves, and only want whats best for themselves.
naughtypagan72 3 years ago 3
LOL! The Greatest President Has SPOKEN!
OK Kids drugs are bad for you! what the bad man and woman said, just ignore them and DON'T DO DRUGS! : )
Ronald Reagan would flip in his grave if he saw this lol.
dpchrist26 3 years ago
OMG Hilarious
Halo3fan012 3 years ago
For example, by my using the words homeland security, computers at homeland automatically now focus on this web site, and with back doors in Microsoft IP addresses from each poster now are recorded, who says what, when, and best of all from which ISP -- router -- node and then home address. ^_^ Libraries computer terminals are also on these monitoring programs due to terrorists using picture files to pass messages so even there now anyone seated at a terminal are video taped.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Drug abuse has a wide range of definitions related to taking a psychoactive drug or performance enhancing drug for a non-therapeutic or non-medical effect. All of these definitions imply a negative judgement of the drug use in question. Some of the drugs most often associated with this term include alcohol, amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, methaqualone,
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
THis was amazing - i remember seeing like it was yesterday!
I put it on my night flight playlist. let me know if you find any other good ones out there.
SaintCancer 3 years ago
The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance. Socrates - R.I.P Mr. President there are many who remember you correctly and will always stand like lamp lights to burn away the shadow of lies they cast towards you
powerhousekiller 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these are among many nations whom enjoy the money you give them for drugs who kill our people.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Saudi Arabia has also come under fire for its oppression of religious and political minorities, torture of prisoners, and attitude toward foreign expatriates, homosexuality, and women. Although major human rights groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have repeatedly expressed concern about the states of human rights in Saudi Arabia, the kingdom denies that any human rights abuses take place.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cool double posting ^_^
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
Obviously, some people don't need drugs to be dopey.
baikinmon 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
to see why the 80s were a push to protect us from the east lets lok at some facts..SAUDI CRIMES Human rights in Saudi Arabia are based on sharia religious laws under rule of the Saudi royal family. Many freedoms as described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights do not exist; it is alleged that capital punishment and other penalties are often given to suspected criminals without due process.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago
People like he and JFK Reagan MLK leave a lasting mark with their desire to better lives and are always missed.
phoenixhammeroftruth 3 years ago