damn, i would like to shrink to that size and surf that. well, not that. the sets, that shorebreak could break a neck. it's a nice right though, kinda like a mini backdoor. (=
okay most of you are confused, normal is around 30 fps...Tv, human eye etc....we can see upto150 fps, the reason why slow motion has such high fps is because it's, well, so slow, it has extra frames that would normally be skipped at say 30 or 40 fps but to the human it's just as smooth, but faster, but it doesn't mean lower fps = faster or higher fps = slower, it depends on how many frames are actually being shown.
yeah, its more, 30 sounds right, not sure on the number, but i know 25 fps is a common mistake because that is the optimum number before our brains notice a "mistake", and TV's use 25fps as its small and saves bandwidth
it is true, the article i read was about some scientists are using them to analyise the shockwave produced by a bullet hitting a steel plate. Because it takes 1 million fps it can only store 100 frames so they have to time it extreamly precisely, which is why you dont see many million fps videos :D
ummmmm yup it is maybe 3. the shere beauty of water in motion and the combination lens and frame rate actualy make it look large. Maybe we should have put a transformer in it. no no only kiding.
I noticed that it looks like the camera is moving along the wave line but that's just elements of the shot playing tricks on your mind... isn't it? :P
it's a special high frame rate camera. They're between 25,000.00 dollars and 30,000.00 dollars. if you did it in any video editing program it would be crappier than an outhouse. earlpie
there is a big difference between the less expensive cameras and the pro gear. The cameras I use are as low as $25,000 and go up to well over $250,000. The Casio is ok for some shots, but the low resolution limits the final output. Many lenses alone are over 10K.
I hope you enjoy our images any link some of your own also.
I'm sick of seeing this low budget shit. absolute bollocks.
how do i unsuscribe? its doing my fuckin head in, I keep sayin, right i'l give it one more chance see if ultraslo can bring out something kinda cool but no, its the same random bollocks being posted all the fuckin time. fuck it.
Great, I really need to go pee now.
MichaelLinnMusic 7 months ago
at o:22 it looks like there could be a shark fin :o lol...
MSCHEER4LIFE4EVER 7 months ago
calabunga dude
soccerlovingfrenchy 8 months ago
thumbs up if you made wave noises watching this
killaz441 8 months ago
Amazing! I never knew something we take for granted like this could be so complex!
joshuatk59 8 months ago
thhiiss iisss sssssoooooo coool is it awesome or am i just amazed easily
curlyfry000254 9 months ago
سبحان الله
TheLeabdou 1 year ago
TSUNAMI!!!!!!!!!!!
hockeyg18 1 year ago
amazing!
doilyfilm 1 year ago
ALRIGHT, I GET IT! Jesus Christ. You don't have to reply to me every goddamn day. I get it already.
VindictiveShadowWolf 1 year ago
What the hell does FPS stand for? 2000 faps per second?
VindictiveShadowWolf 2 years ago 2
Frames per second.
Tullidar1 2 years ago 2
@VindictiveShadowWolf
FPS stands for frames per second.
PyroJesusFreak 1 year ago
frames per second
codyjhunt 1 year ago
Frames.
Darthwannabe 1 year ago
frames per second....
mattymeatpatty 1 year ago
frames per second.
charleshoskinson 1 year ago
damn... that would be awesome
WalleWildberrie 1 year ago
2000 fps??????????? lol
andreasmg2 2 years ago
is it an optical illusion that the camera is moving or is it just me?
ImaJosha 2 years ago
Not an illusion; you can clearly see rocks at the end, which have moved and are unarguably static, so - the camera's moving.
Bulasz 2 years ago
Its not a illusion its real move ;-)
TheDamnProduction 2 years ago
can i have a request?
do a car's burnout (focus on the tyre) in ultraslo motion, so one can see the smoke etc :D
sirtristan01 2 years ago 3
quality is way to low
ulogisk 2 years ago
@ulogisk even tho its shot wit a HQ 4000 fps camera? right
isaiah322 2 years ago
@isaiah322
its a high speed camera i get it, but the resolution does not justify the video, its way too low, get it now?
ulogisk 2 years ago 3
Im Confused?? WTF just happened??
NateTheHawk 2 years ago 2
damn, i would like to shrink to that size and surf that. well, not that. the sets, that shorebreak could break a neck. it's a nice right though, kinda like a mini backdoor. (=
prestonpwns1 2 years ago
shoulda gotten a real wave
bfiane 2 years ago
Try filming a Bee in flight, put one in a large transparent container for 2 minutes and film at about 4000fps see hwat happens ;)
ednuttah 2 years ago
Maybe you creat a file with size of 3 tb? xP
bxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is that real? i mean thats a huge tsunami
jk lol
SuicideFixated 2 years ago
man that's a small wawe look at the rocks lol
adrian2oo9 2 years ago
LOL i know
im not retard
i was kidding
SuicideFixated 2 years ago
Woah, that surfer got barreled. Tubular dude.
kayjames888 2 years ago
coll
chewookiethebacca 2 years ago
Oh man, could you have found a smaller wave?
YawnGod 2 years ago 5
okay most of you are confused, normal is around 30 fps...Tv, human eye etc....we can see upto150 fps, the reason why slow motion has such high fps is because it's, well, so slow, it has extra frames that would normally be skipped at say 30 or 40 fps but to the human it's just as smooth, but faster, but it doesn't mean lower fps = faster or higher fps = slower, it depends on how many frames are actually being shown.
willtron3000 2 years ago 5
yeah, its more, 30 sounds right, not sure on the number, but i know 25 fps is a common mistake because that is the optimum number before our brains notice a "mistake", and TV's use 25fps as its small and saves bandwidth
madskaterfc 2 years ago
ahhh!!! tsunami!!! haha lol
henrydamaster 2 years ago
Is 2000 FPS many ? =) .. I know its alot, but in comparison to the best equipment, and how much does a video camera like that costs?
Kasilopana 2 years ago
maybe im wrong, but i think the human eye sees at 25 fps - if you understand;-)
moonzhae 2 years ago
I understand ;P .. So 50 fps is double as slow as normal? =)
Kasilopana 2 years ago
humans don't see in fps! or when something is turning at high speed it would look like it would start to go backwards! silly billy =)
shaneybaby123 2 years ago
Yes we do actually, we see at 30fps and as such when something is displayed at a lower rate than this we see "visual lag".
The human eye also has a maximum "megapixels" although it is VERY large there is a maximum
PhaygeWoW 2 years ago
best can go up from 5000 to 7000 FPS.
pneumoniacase 2 years ago
are you sure they dont go over 9000
WtFmAtE12244 2 years ago 4
I don't know I've SEEN UP TO 7K. But considering the technological progress nowdays it's possible to go over that.
pneumoniacase 2 years ago
I think they've actually developed 10,000 frames per second.
dkamm65 2 years ago
Yea ...They've developed cameras with over a million fps
MrSummerboredom19 2 years ago
huh then 1 sec would take 1 million times longer, that cant be true
bennerkiller 2 years ago
it is true, the article i read was about some scientists are using them to analyise the shockwave produced by a bullet hitting a steel plate. Because it takes 1 million fps it can only store 100 frames so they have to time it extreamly precisely, which is why you dont see many million fps videos :D
minieggg1 2 years ago
ummm...is it me or is that "wave" about two inches tall?
rockSG1212 2 years ago 21
ummmmm yup it is maybe 3. the shere beauty of water in motion and the combination lens and frame rate actualy make it look large. Maybe we should have put a transformer in it. no no only kiding.
Enjoy
ultraslo 2 years ago 8
@ultraslo Hey can i make a requestfor a video pls?!?
patrickpolitano 1 year ago
Yeah, it's just you
LAWLWebshow 2 years ago
thats huge !!!!
sethman1996 2 years ago
it kinda looks huge
Superdeduper739 2 years ago
emagian a little city under it woww
gaines9000 2 years ago
imagine!!!
gearheadguru 2 years ago
awesome
Maxil223 2 years ago
lol all sorts of silouettes forming in the wave from
0:29 :P
chrizzo006 2 years ago 2
omg for some reason this is making me nauseous! Sea sick!
kyounao 2 years ago 3
cool
jslbatman 2 years ago
The camera is MOVING. Look on the rocks at the botm
Gorepwn 3 years ago
Who cares if the camera is moving or not? No big deal.
TonyKnockOff 3 years ago
the camera's moving so u see mmore of the wave breaking dip fuck
benderman6 2 years ago
i need pee :/
Tetinha1 3 years ago 4
i don't get it. if it's slow motion, why do you move the camera so much?
i can't see the phenomenon that is happening there because of all the camera movement.
myM8doteu 3 years ago 12
What camera movement?
I noticed that it looks like the camera is moving along the wave line but that's just elements of the shot playing tricks on your mind... isn't it? :P
Is that the movement you mean?
Maloficu 3 years ago
the camera isnt moving its how the water appears
MrGeTSumm 3 years ago
i know what you mean, but im pretty sure the camera is being moved, you can see the rocks underneath moving out of the frame.
dvaifilmsdotcom 3 years ago 4
its deff moving look at the corners of the video
paco47239 3 years ago
nice
ninjakid215 3 years ago
Whaaaa !!
Gnoufroumou 3 years ago
k so i don't know much about how this works can u tell me do u need a certain camera or a video editing program?
PLAY4ACHIEVEMENTS 3 years ago
yeah the camera is worth thousands.
it records about 30-40x faster than a usual camcorder.
almostausername 3 years ago
it's a special high frame rate camera. They're between 25,000.00 dollars and 30,000.00 dollars. if you did it in any video editing program it would be crappier than an outhouse. earlpie
earlpie 3 years ago
weird, i got mine for like 900$.
logitech4873 3 years ago
there is a big difference between the less expensive cameras and the pro gear. The cameras I use are as low as $25,000 and go up to well over $250,000. The Casio is ok for some shots, but the low resolution limits the final output. Many lenses alone are over 10K.
I hope you enjoy our images any link some of your own also.
Best
ultraslo 3 years ago
i see, i was just saying that there is less expensive cameras that does record at high speeds.
also, how do you get money for a camera that costs as much as a ferarri?
logitech4873 3 years ago
i think they use it for work, their career so they make money off it.
DordorPat 2 years ago
i use my cam for fun.
and for requests.
logitech4873 2 years ago
Could you guys do a video of a peice of wood being chopped? i would find that very interesting! thanks|
yusuk789 3 years ago
lol wood chopped xD Lmao
krasher30 2 years ago
\XDDD
yusuk789 2 years ago
lol i get it, its talking about sex
:D
SiMMkillsAll 2 years ago
OMFG u have 2 much money
benderman6 2 years ago
where did you get over $250.000?
loriziell 2 years ago
I am watching waves in slo-mo....I AM WATCHING WAVES IN SLO-MO!!!!!
Yet somehow its fun to watch :)
chadt4 3 years ago
too bad the quality sucks.
NickBK007 3 years ago
if u watch it closley it looks like horses coming out of the water and disappearing
melissagriffiths000 3 years ago
I KNOW! ISN'T THAT WEIRD?!
earlpie 3 years ago
alda gagloo
WoWOmegaServer 3 years ago
people requested that?! boy, their level of expectation has hit rock bottom
rexcars27 3 years ago
SURF'S UP!
nintendog141 3 years ago
whoaa..like a small tsunami
kambingbetula 3 years ago
lol! you're right!
anakin425 3 years ago
a bigger wave would be nice
mtthwlacroix 3 years ago
try looking at "Awsome surfing in slow motion " in more clips from UltraSlo, all clips.
Enjoy
ultraslo 3 years ago
just add &fmt=18 behind the vid address
wiccashaman 3 years ago 2
Ultraslo is starting to fail...
Talkingwaffle 3 years ago 5
We will try to fix this one
ultraslo 3 years ago
ya they need some better ideas
albinocreampuff 3 years ago
ita all pixel-y, not great quality
that is some nasty lookin water :-/
chickensarecool01 3 years ago
so bad quality...
hugoqc321 3 years ago 2
it could be better if it was in a higher quality
grevejp 3 years ago
kinda disappointing, but they have other good vids
oscargurses 3 years ago
It as alright, but the quality of the vid was very crappy.
Run4runes 3 years ago
Beautiful! I liked this. Wish it were available in high quality, though.
sosogood 3 years ago
I'm sick of seeing this low budget shit. absolute bollocks.
how do i unsuscribe? its doing my fuckin head in, I keep sayin, right i'l give it one more chance see if ultraslo can bring out something kinda cool but no, its the same random bollocks being posted all the fuckin time. fuck it.
Lloydo46 3 years ago
you push the unsubscribe button??.....
sodapopsrgood 3 years ago
nicccc so relaxin
Edge3x 3 years ago
Wonderful!!
J35U50986 3 years ago
oh that was beautiful
Killre2801 3 years ago
THIS DESERVES SO Much more than 509 views and 13 comments, its sooooo good
XxCheeseXxProd 3 years ago
thats because its new
grevejp 3 years ago
now do a blendtec blender!
dator36 3 years ago
You should really try recording the mentos + diet coke reaction, that would be REALLY awesome!
MrSonicfan 3 years ago
why is this at 2000 fps but a bee can be at 5000? or a lady bug at 7000?
DevinedKiller 3 years ago
we use different settings for different subjects.
ultraslo 3 years ago
Very nice, too bad it isn't in high quality :(
czechhorstfuchs 3 years ago
awesome
emailzforlife 3 years ago
adjective
4d4mz 3 years ago
pretty hard to tell what the hell I was looking at in the beginning but still nice video.
inad316 3 years ago
poooor queality
aap998 3 years ago 4
amazing! great job
problemloadingpage 3 years ago
beautiful
wainboy 3 years ago
cool
Chris123TV 3 years ago
awsome
brampton1357 3 years ago
sweet
skategul10 3 years ago
nice
aznlilhero 3 years ago