if i remember right there was CCTV footage shown on one of the news networks that showed a streaking missile move towards the plane in the sky. it was aired once and then never again!
It was a tragedy and a travesty. The tragedy was the plane exploding. and a travesty of the cover up. Fact is in the eightty odd years of commercial aviation, only two plane crashes have been attributed to "fuel tank explosion": TWA 800 and Philippine 434 out of Manila and any explosion out of there would be suspected terrorism. And since when did the FBI investigate flight crashes? They pushed the NTSB out of the way to cover their butts after Ruby Ridge and Waco.
plane crashes are rare FULL STOP. So saying any particular mode of crash is rare is a meaningless statement, there is no such thing as a "normal" air disaster as extraordinary effort is made to prevent accidents so it is to be expected that unusual and unexpected things cause disasters...
.
You criticise the FBI for getting involved, well equally people would be suspicious if the FBI wasn't called in if foul play was suspected.
@NCspook Anytime that there is question as to wether or not a bomb was used or an act of terrorism took place and resulted in the crash of an airplane, both the FBI and the NTSB investigate it. "since when did the FBI investigate flight crashes?" Answer = ALWAYS.
Lisa Perry obviously distinguishes between a rising missle and the TWA 800 aircraft. She is also a rare witness to both missiles as she shows by telling how the second missile 'shadowed' the aircraft allowing its outline to be seen separately from the missile. She then describes it 'shattering' the aircraft. They tried to discredit her by getting bogus 'experts' to say her retina didn't have enough pixels to see that at that distance. But her statement obviously says otherwise. She was ignored.
Ms Perry is obviously distinguishing between a rising object separate from the 747 and the 747 itself. Her testimony has to be excluded and cut down by the official story and its backers because it destroys the zoom-climb theory. I've seen a bogus analysis claiming her retina pixels weren't dense enough to pick-up the airplane at that distance. However, she clearly describes the 747 being shadowed and outlined in profile by the second missle. She's clearly describing a missile impact.
This is all assuming Lisa Perry is telling the truth.
I mean you should at least consider the possibility she lied, you consider that the FBI, NTSB, US Navy, and virtually every single branch of the US government are full the the brim with liars without a single ounce of proof... why not this lone woman?
My hearts goes out to the families. IS a very strange case and Appears no truth there. Beside is extremely rare that planes blows up by itself. Classic example Ahola Airlines 737 has serious metal fatique, plane had ripped fuselauge, but did not blow up, so what s the difference in TWA 800.
the difference is that the bottom part of the plane didnt burst since it is the strongest part of the fusalage. after the bottom part is gone your bassically screwed. since the top part of the aloha plane flew of it still had the bottom(which is stronger) holding the plane togethr
Doesnt sound like it just exploded...it does sound like missiles streaked toward the aircraft before it blew up....from all the eye witness accounts and the footage captured by security cameras on the ground.... Awful event. R.I.P.
if i remember right there was CCTV footage shown on one of the news networks that showed a streaking missile move towards the plane in the sky. it was aired once and then never again!
jsb3287 1 year ago
It was a tragedy and a travesty. The tragedy was the plane exploding. and a travesty of the cover up. Fact is in the eightty odd years of commercial aviation, only two plane crashes have been attributed to "fuel tank explosion": TWA 800 and Philippine 434 out of Manila and any explosion out of there would be suspected terrorism. And since when did the FBI investigate flight crashes? They pushed the NTSB out of the way to cover their butts after Ruby Ridge and Waco.
NCspook 2 years ago
@NCspook
plane crashes are rare FULL STOP. So saying any particular mode of crash is rare is a meaningless statement, there is no such thing as a "normal" air disaster as extraordinary effort is made to prevent accidents so it is to be expected that unusual and unexpected things cause disasters...
.
You criticise the FBI for getting involved, well equally people would be suspicious if the FBI wasn't called in if foul play was suspected.
Treblaine 1 year ago
@NCspook Anytime that there is question as to wether or not a bomb was used or an act of terrorism took place and resulted in the crash of an airplane, both the FBI and the NTSB investigate it. "since when did the FBI investigate flight crashes?" Answer = ALWAYS.
aowen1609 1 year ago
Lisa Perry obviously distinguishes between a rising missle and the TWA 800 aircraft. She is also a rare witness to both missiles as she shows by telling how the second missile 'shadowed' the aircraft allowing its outline to be seen separately from the missile. She then describes it 'shattering' the aircraft. They tried to discredit her by getting bogus 'experts' to say her retina didn't have enough pixels to see that at that distance. But her statement obviously says otherwise. She was ignored.
Exiles800 2 years ago 8
Ms Perry is obviously distinguishing between a rising object separate from the 747 and the 747 itself. Her testimony has to be excluded and cut down by the official story and its backers because it destroys the zoom-climb theory. I've seen a bogus analysis claiming her retina pixels weren't dense enough to pick-up the airplane at that distance. However, she clearly describes the 747 being shadowed and outlined in profile by the second missle. She's clearly describing a missile impact.
Exiles800 2 years ago
@Exiles800
This is all assuming Lisa Perry is telling the truth.
I mean you should at least consider the possibility she lied, you consider that the FBI, NTSB, US Navy, and virtually every single branch of the US government are full the the brim with liars without a single ounce of proof... why not this lone woman?
Treblaine 1 year ago
My hearts goes out to the families. IS a very strange case and Appears no truth there. Beside is extremely rare that planes blows up by itself. Classic example Ahola Airlines 737 has serious metal fatique, plane had ripped fuselauge, but did not blow up, so what s the difference in TWA 800.
eal1011 3 years ago
the difference is that the bottom part of the plane didnt burst since it is the strongest part of the fusalage. after the bottom part is gone your bassically screwed. since the top part of the aloha plane flew of it still had the bottom(which is stronger) holding the plane togethr
denverJPUE 2 years ago
Doesnt sound like it just exploded...it does sound like missiles streaked toward the aircraft before it blew up....from all the eye witness accounts and the footage captured by security cameras on the ground.... Awful event. R.I.P.
temanatahiti 3 years ago 17