@BMW130ii , from 0-60, you'd be shocked how close a much less powerful CLS550 comes to the CLS63. As much as I love the 6.2L AMG V8, I think it's a little low on torque in the low end (unlike the MB 5.5L V8 engines) and im skeptical of its max power output rating. A torquier CLS55 AMG with 50 less horsepower is faster from virtually any speed up to 150 mph. There are videos to back this claim up.
ITS NO FASTER THAN CLS550 ARE YOU SERIOUS?! 550 0-60 7.5 and CLS63 AMG is 0-60 in 4.3 seconds and thats notr much of a difference?!?!? Why would they say goodbye did it die or something its 50,000-90,000
@zenenmoro , That depends on how long the race you have in mind is and on your perception of "huuge". From a 40 mph roll, im certain a CLS550 will hang on to a CLS63 for about 2~3 sec, and once above 65 mph the AMG will begin to pull at a rate of <1/3 car length per second. Even in a standing start 1/4 mile, the difference seperating a CLS550 and a CLS63 is only about 5 carlengths. It'd have to be a pretty long race (even at highway speeds) to see a huuge difference between the two cars.
@vili567 , MBUSA (very conservatively) estimates low 5s for the 07-11 CLS550. But actual instrumented testing has the CLS550 at 4.7 sec 0-60 in a 2007 car and driver road test. Look it up.
Info was a little off, and they said goodbye? I didnt understand that part and there information wasn't slightly right, CLS550 is way slower also so not the best review.
God this journalist is a fucking idiot.. When i was 13 i could've done a better job reporting accurate facts about an automobile.. Just goes to show, if your going to be an automotive journalist, also be an automotive enthusiast, you can't do one without the other.. I've listened to this review about 5 times, and not only is he giving incorrect information, his oral presentation is horrible.. Damn, Insideline / edmunds.. I'll be his replacement, hit me up..
the narrator is commenting on the top speed comparison. both the 550 and 63 amg are limited to 155mph. not the acceleration or 1/4 mile.
sure with the performance package you raise the top speed to 186 give er take in the amg but this car obviously did not come with the package.
*most 1/4 mile times stated are the test AVERAGE. its not likely youll pull of 12.4 EVERY single time in this car. unless you have a robotic foot calibrated to perform the same exact process each time.
The CLS63 will smoke the CLS550 My father ran 12.3 @ 116 in the 1/4 mile at atco with this car. The 550 is a low 13 second car, fast but not 507 HP fast. These guys need to learn how to drive, 12.8 is by far the worst 1/4 mile time I've seen for this car. Try 4.1 to 60 12.4 @ 115 in Motor Trend & that's brand new. They get faster when broken in.
i know right ! this guy pissed me off he was way off with the stats and 1/4 mile and then he says the cls 550 is just as fast wtf ??? and if they get 5 mph slower in the slalom than a m5 they are just bad fuckin drivers.
Need to learn how to drive?? I understand that these guys may be retarded haha but this car is auto sooo it's basically, light turns green and punch it and thats about the end of it, any 16 year old should be able to accomplish that and get the same time with the same car. I'm just speaking on the 1/4 test. So yeah I don't know how they are getting different times then other reports on the car
Yeah, it doesn't make sense, the only thing I can think of is they must be coming off at an idle instead of power breaking it. Not sure if that's the issue but, it sure does make a difference performance wise.
Haha yeahh I hear ya, and you right with the power braking. Who the hell knows with these guys, seems like they can be a joke sometimes, especially with this review with some of the facts being jacked
yeah but, theres a huge defference than a 63 and a 550. a 63 is hand made by the amg devision in germany and is built like a rolls or like an s-class or maybach. and its really the mechanizm that makes it 26k more
What a strange (stupied) comment in the video: " Non AMG CLS 550... and a 63 is no faster or quicker" ???
Differnce almoust of 150HP is no difference?!
BMW130ii 9 months ago
@BMW130ii , from 0-60, you'd be shocked how close a much less powerful CLS550 comes to the CLS63. As much as I love the 6.2L AMG V8, I think it's a little low on torque in the low end (unlike the MB 5.5L V8 engines) and im skeptical of its max power output rating. A torquier CLS55 AMG with 50 less horsepower is faster from virtually any speed up to 150 mph. There are videos to back this claim up.
4MATICbenz 8 months ago
ya good one ..one of the most liked cls
proximer217 1 year ago
Comment removed
4MATICbenz 1 year ago
Give me this over any other super-sedan any day. In fact, give it to me in that same gorgeous color!
jaymum23 1 year ago
ma jebem ti mercedes FERRARI 458 ITALIA je zakon
TheMarkos427 1 year ago
same performance numbers as the 5.0 mustang....YEE!
GTGTRR 1 year ago
a cls550 is 5.4 sec u dom ass...
johnnydrumma24 1 year ago
ITS NO FASTER THAN CLS550 ARE YOU SERIOUS?! 550 0-60 7.5 and CLS63 AMG is 0-60 in 4.3 seconds and thats notr much of a difference?!?!? Why would they say goodbye did it die or something its 50,000-90,000
TheCarMasta13 2 years ago
@TheCarMasta13 , A CLS550 runs 4.7sec 0-60. The CLS63 AMG is surprisingly only a tiny bit faster.
And for God's sake, learn how to spell, please!
4MATICbenz 1 year ago
@4MATICbenz ok and when the road keeps going? from around a 40 mph roll the difference would be huuge!
zenenmoro 8 months ago
@zenenmoro , That depends on how long the race you have in mind is and on your perception of "huuge". From a 40 mph roll, im certain a CLS550 will hang on to a CLS63 for about 2~3 sec, and once above 65 mph the AMG will begin to pull at a rate of <1/3 car length per second. Even in a standing start 1/4 mile, the difference seperating a CLS550 and a CLS63 is only about 5 carlengths. It'd have to be a pretty long race (even at highway speeds) to see a huuge difference between the two cars.
4MATICbenz 8 months ago
@4MATICbenz in a race....5 car lengths is a huge difference!
zenenmoro 8 months ago
@4MATICbenz Are you sure the CLS550 runs 4.7 0-60 isnt it like over 5 seconds?
vili567 2 months ago
@vili567 , MBUSA (very conservatively) estimates low 5s for the 07-11 CLS550. But actual instrumented testing has the CLS550 at 4.7 sec 0-60 in a 2007 car and driver road test. Look it up.
4MATICbenz 2 months ago
@4MATICbenz Oh sorry i must i have thought of the CLS500 when i typed this comment.
vili567 2 months ago
The car remains comfortable and compliant.... as mercedes is known for
bsumattallica 2 years ago
yep conmfortable and fast
TheCarMasta13 2 years ago
@thecarmasta
lol idk i've driven a couple benz's that had no go at all. the older diesels
bsumattallica 2 years ago
Info was a little off, and they said goodbye? I didnt understand that part and there information wasn't slightly right, CLS550 is way slower also so not the best review.
TheTubestar12 2 years ago
my volkswagen cc kinda looks like one, a lil, eh not really. loll
clubheadxtasy2 2 years ago
hahah the CLS 63 is a second faster to 60mph
nedforrest 2 years ago 2
I think its faster by 3 or 4 seconds trust me im a car guy
TheTubestar12 2 years ago
God this journalist is a fucking idiot.. When i was 13 i could've done a better job reporting accurate facts about an automobile.. Just goes to show, if your going to be an automotive journalist, also be an automotive enthusiast, you can't do one without the other.. I've listened to this review about 5 times, and not only is he giving incorrect information, his oral presentation is horrible.. Damn, Insideline / edmunds.. I'll be his replacement, hit me up..
trav187 2 years ago
the narrator is commenting on the top speed comparison. both the 550 and 63 amg are limited to 155mph. not the acceleration or 1/4 mile.
sure with the performance package you raise the top speed to 186 give er take in the amg but this car obviously did not come with the package.
*most 1/4 mile times stated are the test AVERAGE. its not likely youll pull of 12.4 EVERY single time in this car. unless you have a robotic foot calibrated to perform the same exact process each time.
nmac121 2 years ago
Wait did the narrator just say the 63 AMG is not quicker than the CLS550?
What a fucking moron.
AMGFromHell 2 years ago 4
i had to listen to that twice haha
san21893 2 years ago
The CLS63 will smoke the CLS550 My father ran 12.3 @ 116 in the 1/4 mile at atco with this car. The 550 is a low 13 second car, fast but not 507 HP fast. These guys need to learn how to drive, 12.8 is by far the worst 1/4 mile time I've seen for this car. Try 4.1 to 60 12.4 @ 115 in Motor Trend & that's brand new. They get faster when broken in.
IrishChris1979 3 years ago
i know right ! this guy pissed me off he was way off with the stats and 1/4 mile and then he says the cls 550 is just as fast wtf ??? and if they get 5 mph slower in the slalom than a m5 they are just bad fuckin drivers.
AMGkompressor20 2 years ago
i know they idiots ^3 amg is faster than 550 by like 3 seconds and they dont think thats a difference?!
TheCarMasta13 2 years ago
Need to learn how to drive?? I understand that these guys may be retarded haha but this car is auto sooo it's basically, light turns green and punch it and thats about the end of it, any 16 year old should be able to accomplish that and get the same time with the same car. I'm just speaking on the 1/4 test. So yeah I don't know how they are getting different times then other reports on the car
Grmcrsrlz 2 years ago
Yeah, it doesn't make sense, the only thing I can think of is they must be coming off at an idle instead of power breaking it. Not sure if that's the issue but, it sure does make a difference performance wise.
IrishChris1979 2 years ago 2
Haha yeahh I hear ya, and you right with the power braking. Who the hell knows with these guys, seems like they can be a joke sometimes, especially with this review with some of the facts being jacked
Grmcrsrlz 2 years ago
OMG I just realized I spelled it breaking instead of braking lol. Oops
IrishChris1979 2 years ago
Hahah ohh yeahh you did, ahh eff it who cares, close enough
Grmcrsrlz 2 years ago
Sexiest chassis sedan of the century!
Xevisberi 3 years ago 16
you should see the 2010 model!
djburrondarize 3 years ago 2
where can you see it? im trying to seach for it but i cant find it.
Atoweha 2 years ago
ebay or ask your local MErcedes Benz dealer, if they get one they can tell you, or get a car broker
TheTubestar12 2 years ago
Edmunds always gived the slowest times though this car gets 4.1 0-60 in road and track
swtendo 4 years ago
That sounds right. Amazing speed
AKAbimmer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the 550 is 0,2 sec slower to 60mph hahahah... maybe a little expensive for so little extra enginevise
MarinerMercury 4 years ago
yeah but, theres a huge defference than a 63 and a 550. a 63 is hand made by the amg devision in germany and is built like a rolls or like an s-class or maybach. and its really the mechanizm that makes it 26k more
sachakishlar 4 years ago 4
i know, it is much better in that way
MarinerMercury 4 years ago
4.4 seconds for that kind of weight is god like.
snguyenn 4 years ago 13
..."fast and quick"...where did this guy learn english?
bob22bob 4 years ago 3
I know, and "five hundred seven horsepower"...I'm sure it's actually "five hundred AND seven horsepower"
Jeansie101 3 years ago
this is a 4 door coupe not a sedan like the narrator says...
Lucik27 4 years ago 2
how is the cls63 not any faster or quicker than the cls500, when it has over 100 hp more, yet its virtually the same vehicle?
b0rncha0s 4 years ago 4
so the new naturally aspirated 63 AMG's are faster than the older supercharged 55 AMG's...more hp but n/a...thats a good gain
swtendo 4 years ago
Less torque though
StreeTRacR008 4 years ago
ya but still faster 0-60 so who cares lol
swtendo 4 years ago