Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Retsquid is a troll. Pay no attention to him.
sandman4224 2 years ago
well retsquid,they were wrong!
joe00727 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL!
RetSquid 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
U.S. Supreme Court
The Revenue Act of 1918 approved February 24, 1919, c. 18, 210, 211, 212(a), 213(a), 40 Stat. 1057, 1062, 1064, 1065, imposes a tax upon the net income of every individual including 'income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal service ... of whatever kind and in whatever form paid,' LUCAS v. EARL, 281 U.S. 111 (1930)
RetSquid 3 years ago
quoting cases is pretty mutch worthless in making your point . i can quote all day and i can take it from the code. if it were as you think why do we need to give permision why dont they just say pay this bill?
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RetSquid "Income" does not mean "all that comes in" and is limited to federally-connected renumeration/receipts.
beingjohngalt1 1 year ago