Added: 4 years ago
From: ScaningTheWaves
Views: 581,149
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,881)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey Ron Paul.. They were individually put in jail...

  • Can't wait till he becomes President 

  • Great response by Paul. Poor CNN didn't get their nasty sound bite.

  • He's speaking from his heart. It's so clear.

  • We have got to get this man elected...

    

  • sounds like hes making sense RON PAUL 2012!!!!!

  • obama said he would bring back troops, Ron paul says he will bring back troops

    obama said he would legalize marijauana, Ron paul says he will legalize

    obama said no more secrets, Ron paul says no more secrets.

    im for ron paul, but it seems kinda fishy no?

  • @GRAPEDRANK12 I thought the same thing aswell, until I found out Ron Paul was sticking to his word for 30 long years. Plus all this censorship crap I've been seeing time and time again is even more fishy to me. :P I honestly believe this is the person we've been waiting for, but has been hidden from us for a long time.

  • @GRAPEDRANK12 Not really. But one has 2 keep in mind how politics works, and then figger out if Paul is like the other politicians ;)

  • @GRAPEDRANK12 Fishy that two presidential candidates would say they would do the things that the American people want the most? Yeah, real fishy just like when I go to an interview for a new job and say I'M THE BEST! How old are you anyway? Haven't politicians always made promises that they couldn't keep? I know an honest man when I see one, and Ron Paul is the only honest politician I've ever seen. Let's get him in office so we can keep him honest!

  • @dp1569 I would also like to say, Ron Paul has been in the public eye and behind the same moral and ethical standard, on the platform of constitutionalism and limited government since day one. In 2008, Obama crept out of the shadows and bought the spotlight and it was a testament to the power of the media. And they put him up against McCain. How could he lose? Hype won over truth. A not so great man once said, "fool me once...." lets see if they can fool us once again.

  • hmmm NOT shocking at all....just stupid..move on. RON PAUL all the way.!

  • I think james b powell wrote the offensive newsletters, I read one that he was confirmed to have written and one that was offensive with no author, both authors have a similar vocabulary and writing style

  • Dont worry Paul, collectively this has been watched by millions!!!!

  • Another trashing by the estabishment on Ron Paul.

    Ron Paul WINS !!! 2012

  • wolf blitzer's a fucking horrible interviewer. he just needs to admit he's wrong and stfu. it's like he doesn't even listen to what ron paul says.

  • The fact that Ron Paul didn't get elected in 2008 is kinda scary now looking back at all this. That doesn't mean he wont be elected in 2010, however.

  • Actions speak much louder than words on a 20 year newletter,,, this is all they can dig up on you for decades???? we support you Dr Paul!!!

  • In sum - Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) is a racist. His newsletter. His beliefs. He was probably the actual author of all of it. Racist, racist, racist. His followers are like a cult; excuse, attempt to justify, proclaim persecution. Your man is a racist. Get over it.

    E

    Postscript. Oh, and he will lose. Racists always lose. Cheers.

  • @DeltaSigChi4  lol. nice troll

  • @DeltaSigChi4 maybe you are a racist ?!!

    How old are you ?!! if you are 35 , please delete the 5 , because you are acting like you are 3 !!!

    It does not matter if he wins or not, but you know what , a honest man can never be a racist okay !!!

    And just for you information YOU CANNOT FIND MORE HONEST POLITICIAN THE RON PAUL!!!

  • @IceFireSoul A honest man cannot be a racist? So if one is honest, one cannot hold discriminatory prejudices? Does not pass the common sense test; same as Paul's claims that he knew nothing about the newsletter, especially when he boasted about it (the newsletter, not the contents). And Paulites always turn to attacking critics because they know of no other way to defend their cult leader. Grow up.

    E

  • u GOT THE VOTE OF THE BROWNS TOO

  • "did you read these newsletters?"

    *Crickets*

    he was sillent for just a tat too long.

  • Ron, you seriously expect us to believe that you don't know who wrote it? You never read the newsletter that bears your name and signature?

  • I have to pick at one thing. I don't like the label "civil disobedience". That implies that we are not following a rule. We think, learn and act in language. I think any protest would be better labeled as exercising civil autonomy. In other words, we protest because we can think for ourselves and they are full of shit. Except Ron, of course.

  • iF THE GUY IS AS BAD AS THEY SAY, I`M SORRY BUT HE`S STILL BETTER THAN ANY BUSH, CLINTON OR REAGAN FAMILY CRAP THE US CAN IMPOSE ON THE REST OF THE WORLD. pOLITICAL FAMALIES TIED FIRMLY TO THE BIGGEST BUSINESS AND CORPORATE MACHINES WHO LITERALY CONTROL THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WHICH SPANS CONTINENTS. jOIN THE DOTS PEOPLE. WATCH AS MANY VIDS ON YOU TUBE COS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MAD SHIT IS THE TRUTH. THE PENNY DROPS AND THERE`S NO TURNING BACK!

  • write him in if you have to

  • The newsletter was written by his friends and relatives. He's just another right-wing liar.

    Ron Paul's definition of liberty: the right of the individual to expolit, impoverish and oppress others without democracy or government getting in the way.

  • @TheForwardGaze How do you know for a fact it was his friends & relatives? Even if that's the case it wasn't Ron Paul that wrote this shit & there's nothing on Record with him making any remotely racist comments, in fact he is the only one talking about how the war on drugs is unfairly afflicting the poor & minorities & I don't hear any other Congressman except for maybe Kucinich even broach the subject so as far as I'm concerned he is one of the least racist congressman. Ron Paul 2112!!!

  • @TheForwardGaze This is just bs. Quit trying to mislead people.

  • Action speaks louder than words... whether he did or did not say these things or if he actually publicly endorsed these inflammatory newsletters; the important reality is that he hasn't acted upon these beliefs in public or perhaps private life. He has not politically supported the means of government that would violate his libertarian morals or non-interventionist ethics.

    By violating these philosophical fundamentals of human action have people created the current would around us.

  • @EvilResult well spoken!

  • 67% of blacks are in prison? What on earth is Paul talking about?

    It's a shame. He's got some important ideas but he's gettingharder to take seriously.

    And his excuse for the disgusting garbage he published is pathetic. He says, it's not the publisher's responsibility - it's the editors. Great. So who's the editor? and why did Paul do nothing & fail to disavow any of it for more than 15 years?

    No other candidate would be allowed to get away with this crap. Neither should Paul

  • @citizenghosttown. Let the mainstream media do its hatchet job on Paul. No need for you to try to help them.

  • @Uncle99B

    If the mainstream media did it's job, they would have held Paul's feet to his fire regarding Paul's disgusting publication a long time ago. They didn't because they never took him seriously as a candidate.

    Stop making excuses for Paul. He's not a victim here.

  • @citizenghosttow bahahaha you can't even comprehend what he is saying. It's 67% of people in jail are blacks..So until you learn how to interpret the english language, don't come onto youtube and try to spread your bullshit propaganda that you heard on the mainstream news! SAVE OUR COUNTRY! RON PAUL 2012!

  • @onehighspeedsoldier

    "It's 67% of people in jail are blacks"

    Then maybe that's what he should have said.

    I'm sorry if you find this story about Paul's disgusting publication inconvenient. But calling it "bullshit propaganda" when every word is true isn't fooling anyone and it's certainly not going to do Paul any favors in this election. His answers have been insufficient and his excuses have been pathetic.

    Paul has nobody to blame but himself here.

  • @citizenghosttown Go ahead and vote any of the other puppet candidates in.. You will see how bad of a mistake it really was when they send the cattle trucks into your neighborhood so they can take you off to FEMA camps! The only one of these candidates that even has the balls to speak a word about NDAA is none other than Ron Paul! Furthermore, Rand Paul was only one of seven senators that voted against NDAA..So you need to wake the fuck up before it's too late buddy.

  • @onehighspeedsoldier

    In other words, who cares about Paul's racist publications, his divisiveness, his affiliation with bigots, his political opportunism, his his horrible judgment, his poor oversight and his lack of honesty. We should forget all of that just vote for him because our freedom is in jeopardy & Ron Paul is our best hope and savior.

    Sorry, I've heard it all before.

    It seems Paul's fans don't really want him to win. They just want to have a ready excuse.

  • @citizenghosttown form your opinions and do your thinking for you.

  • @citizenghosttown So I take it that you have no idea what the NDAA ,since you failed to acknowledge it! I am working with facts and you are just regurgitating the garbage that mainstream media feeds you.It is really odd that the policies that he supports on drugs would be much more beneficial to blacks than it would for whites since the percentage of blacks in jail for non-violent drug related charges is significantly higher than those that are white. Keep letting fox and cnn

  • @citizenghosttown You seriously thought that's what he meant? I mean, c'mon, really? Really? Even after considering his statement immediately before that? Or were you just looking for a reason to jump...?

    He's already answered your other questions. If you care to know the answers, you can find them everywhere; they've only been brought out of the basement every time his opponents and the media get scared that he might be taking some votes.

    Care to put your pick to the test?

  • @PleasantlyPeanut

    “He's already answered your other questions”

    He hasn’t answered a SINGLE one. You know this – otherwise it would be a simple thing for you to answer any of them.

    Look, I understand you'd rather talk about what you LIKE about Paul. And I get why Paul would rather talk about what’s wrong with America than deal with the fact that he published this racist garbage.

    But he hasn’t dealt with this in a serious way.He needs to.if he's serious about running for President.

  • @citizenghosttown Funny, you didn't answer my question. Who do you endorse?

    Regardless if you believe what he's said, his actions have not shown him to be a racist and no one has come forward to say that he personally has ever said anything to indicate he might be. I can say you're a racist; prove otherwise. I can write a newsletter with your letterhead and have it contain statements that can be taken as racist; prove you didn't know about them. You're asking the impossible.

  • @PleasantlyPeanut

    "Who do you endorse?"

    Not sure, but why change the subject? Is it your point that Paul's opponents are using this against him? Well of course they are. So?  Is Paul running for office or isn't he? I don't favor Paul but before this, I used to respect him.

    .

    "I can write a newsletter with your letterhead and have it contain statements that can be taken as racist."

    Poor analogy. Paul was the PUBLISHER of this newsletter.He raised money from it. He's not a victim here.

  • @citizenghosttown No, that wasn't my point. I'm done. There is no sense trying to have a discussion with someone who is hellbent on thinking the worst and distorting the facts to support that agenda. I, frankly, don't care who you support. I only hope that America doesn't suffer greatly for your ignorance. Which, if you pick any of the other candidates, it will. Enjoy the ride.

  • @PleasantlyPeanut

    Run along then. Go ahead and pretend that MY agenda is the issue.

    As you know, I havent' distorted a thing. If Ron Paul wants to be taken seriously, he needs to deal with this in a serious way. NO other candidate would get away with such drivel - neither should Paul.

    This blindness is sad - some of you are so convinced that America NEEDS Ron Paul, you're willing to make the most pathetic excuses for his disgusting newsletter. Paul has nobody to blame but himself.

  • @citizenghosttown It's called reasoning. Paul has ack'd the newsletters and has said that he didn't write them. They were written by others while he was busy with other things like his med practice. He has accepted responsibility for not paying attention to them. He has stated that he does not in any way endorse what they said. His actions have NEVER shown him to be a racist, nor has anyone said that they have ever seen or heard anything from the man that would indicate he is.

  • @PleasantlyPeanut

    "He has accepted responsibility for not paying attention to them"

    Of course he hasn't.That's the problem.

    When asked why he's done NOTHING to identify the writers or editors of the newsletter that his company published (AND which raised considerable money for him) & why he's done nothing to disassociate himself from the remarks, he refuses to answer. Instead he blames the media as if it's THEIR fault he published such filth.

    In no way has he taken responsibility

  • fuck ron paul he is a sneaky racist!!!!!

  • @MrDestruction25 Ron Paul's racist & the other Neo-Cons running against him aren't? He made a mistake by letting that shit into anything with his name on it but he has said a million times "I was very busy running a medical practice & being a Congressman". He wasn't involved with the ins & outs of the magazine. Why is this so hard to believe? Even if it's true & he's a racist which I doubt, if he does nothing more than veto bad bills from congress we'll be better off with him than anybody else.

  • @Conquistador2112 <--Another example of an uneducated and brainwashed liberal swine. This weak attempt to dismantle Ron Paul by labeling him as a "racist" is as absurd as the media destroying Herman Cain because he was a threat to Obongo.

  • @Lrdvltr Your a fucking dumb ass! I was sticking up for Ron Paul & saying that I was still voting for him because I believe it when he says he's not a racist so what the fuck is your problem numb-nuts!!! If it wasn't for the fact that I really want Ron Paul to be elected I would tell you he doesn't need your vote but you should choose your battles with non supporters of Dr. Paul not people who support him if you really want him to be elected!!! Oh and by the way, I'm not a liberal DUMB ASS!!!

  • Comment removed

  • even if he did say this which im sure at one point he did say something negative about blacks. it doesnt change a thing. just like it didnt matter when people found out G. W. Bush did cocaine and was charged with it and was a alcoholic, or when they found out the govenator was in the Hitler Youth. everyone has said something bad about another race at one time and if they deny it they are a liar.

  • Totally straight told the media "YOU LET ME FINISH!" lol RON PAUL 2012

  • Blitzer doesn't even listen to the responses

  • Why does Blitzer not disclose he is former paid propagandist for AIPAC?

    Better yet, how the hell does this Blitzer get to present himself as a journalist?

  • @Uncle99B Yeah, those are great points. Because Wolf Blitzer - as with everybody else who is so very disillusioned as to promote & be in favor of AIPAC and the evil regime of Zionist Israel - severely distorts the truth to make it seem like Zionists never do or say anything wrong and they make the massive mistake of falsely making it seem like honest & trustworthy people such as Ron Paul tell horrible lies.

  • @ocf1fan1. Blitzer is one of them. I doubt the existence of a God, but the existence and success of the Zionists makes me believe in Satan

  • @Uncle99B Since you mentioned Wolf Blitzer, check out the great way that David Duke defended himself against that putz Wolf Blitzer in this interview: /watch?v=PM9WBS1q6k8

  • @ocf1fan1. I have seen that. Anyone who watches that will be mystified hwo the mainstream media can sell Blitzer as a journalist and Duke as a radical when it is clear that Duke makes a whole lot of sense and Blitzer is only interest in pushing the Likkud agenda.

  • That's true what Ron Paul said about the discrimination with the war on drugs. Common man we could keep the drugs and guns out of the hood if we wanted to but we don't. It's no coincidence poor people make up the majority of our prison population. Ron Paul speaks the truth and even though I think he had bad judgment letting that kind of racial commentary into his magazine I believe him when he says he's not racist and I'm still voting for him. Ron Paul 2112!!!

  • @Conquistador2112 You say we could keep the drugs& guns out of the hood if we wanted to. Are you aware Ron Paul has no intention of doing that? He correctly believes guns & drugs should be legal & people should be responsible for themselves. The hood destroys itself & it's their right to live however they want. If you're looking for someone to pass laws in an attempt to protect a group of people Paul is not your guy because he believes people need to care for themselves. That's not the govs role

  • @shananagans5 hahaha you really dont know what your talking about, you dont obviously dont understand the way this system really works...start doing some research you uneducated fool, the civil rights movement never did anything, the govt. merely changed the name of "racially segregated" to "projects" or "ghettos" and telling these minorities that they were basically on there own after abusing them for 300 years straight, you really need to learn your history and look at the bigger picture

  • Comment removed

  • Wish you good luck Ron Paul, you are the man. Save the Republic, Save America

  • Ron Paul in 2012

  • im honestly proud of CNN for letting him talk so long. lol

  • Awww Ron is so cute.

  • I know whoi'm voting for Ron Paul

  • Just say'oops we used the wrong video tape it seems'

  • Support Dr. 'Sir' RON PAUL 2012

    Welfarism: Give Jack a fish and he wont go hungry today

    Freedom: Teach Jack to fish, he will never go hungry!

    #UNOCCUPY BIG GOVT.AND THE FED  **AMERICA vs MEDIA**

    FIGHT MEDIA BLACKOUT SPREAD RON'S 'WHAT IF' AND 'IMAGINE' SPEECH ON IPAD,IPOD

    Check Nigel Farage vids taking EU govt. to task

    Please vote on vids and comments, Your opinion matters!

    Write on dollar bills : IN RON WE TRUST ! END THE FED OR FEED THE END

    Click like to support ♥ RON PAUL ♥

  • @ashwadhwani Ron Paul for USA / Nigel Farage for UK

  • Any idiot can write something and plaster a name on the top of it.

    I could write a thesis on cold fusion and say Yogi Bear wrote it.

  • @theBaglady74 Yogi Bear is a genius in regards to sustainable energy.

  • @theBaglady74 Is that you BooBoo?

  • @theBaglady74 ROTFLMAO there Yogi!!

  • Comment removed

  • Everyone knows ron paul is not a racist. We get a good guy with ron paul.

  • fucks sake I shoulda voted for this guy :(

  • @UrHardyRardy He sure is! Here's the truth!

    /watch?v=2yD_e7WFoi8

  • The media sure likes to reach with these old, old news clips. Ron Paul didn't write any of those letters. Blitzer sucks, btw.

    "With persistence we can all prevail and come up with the right answers." - Ron Paul.

    Tea Party Day Money Bomb - December 16, 2011

    Ron Paul 2012.

  • This may be your last chance for an honest real politician.I met the guy and hes great..subscribe to the American Free Press..Dont be a dummy! We lost Ralph Nader and Perot.Get Paul

  • Notice the twitch in his eyes at 1:08 when he says " I do not know who wrote those things"

  • dont you hate it when people call FACTS racist! its not racist if its true! RON PAUL IS HONEST, HES NOT A CORRUPT POLITICIAN! RON PAUL! 2012!

  • Ron Paul is the only republican I'm hearing out.

  • RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!!!!=

    id like to say fuck FOX NEWS and CNN!!!!  anyone who knows to think, will think ron paul!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ 3: 50 Tell the host stop STah STah Stuttering.... pick a side feller...lol

  • a modern day 2pac!!

  • This was such a horribly cheap shot.

  • Ron Paul = Human Power

  • Here's a thought.... Maybe the elite actually do keep tabs on government officials... and maybe they fabricate crap like this to smear anyone who is against their agenda. And for anyone who thinks I'm just another kook... Just look at the patriot act... look at how OWS has been treated... look at internal border patrol checkpoints...  look at our Bill Of Rights being raped daily... Look at the Supreme Court ruling that police can pull you over for nothing and frisk you without cause...

  • they will do anything to keep him out b.c. he might help us. He doesnt fit into there scheme and that pisses them off. I just hope that if he gets in he actually lasts.

  • They hate ron paul because they know hes is the Best. even if he did say that id still vote him in...hes wise enough to see Race is not even the issue...it is everything that keeps ppl blind and all the deception

  • I'm a 29 year old african american an " I WANT OBAMA OUT OF HERE!!" HE IS SUCH A PUPPET TO THE ELITE, HOW COULD YOU MISS IT! Ron's actions speak louder then "MAINSTREAM BS" I'm doung what i can from my neck of da woods, but i need more fella black brotha's and sista's to wake up and realize " ITS NOT A BLACK OR WHITE ISSUE" it is a right or wrong issue! WATCH OBAMA DECEPTION FREE ONLINE. God bless this mess....we all made.

  • @oklahomakidz I'm African-American too, and my response to you is Bush was a puppet of the rich and big business. Is the real reason you dislike Obama is because he isn't one of the "homies" from the ghetto? That he's intelligent, articulate, and well-spoken? Be honest. You can tell me.

  • its time to consider ron paul more of a serious canidate. i hate he hes viewed as such a radical underdog. i think hed be great in the white house

  • Dr. Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks and Ghandi were not libertarians. Dr. King wanted to "...get the government off our back"? Huh?! Vis-a-vis race relations in the country, Dr. King wanted to get the government ON our backs - to end racism in this country. Also, I don't like being referred to as "the Blacks".

  • @Tuxster3 He refers to white people as "the whites" so hes not treating african americans as something bad. One thing people need to see is the intention, not the way its presented. Ron Paul says things how he sees them. He didnt worry about being 100% politically correct since he was getting his point across.

    He was calling the Libertarians since they were all standing up for being judged as individuals as opposed to being generalized into groups.

  • @2014akshay I've always found the expression "politically correct" quite interesting. It's always struck me as a reaction whites and others have about other groups. For instance, Blacks using the description "African-American". It seems to me that many Whites take this as a personal affront. Their view appears to be, "Well, Negro and then Black was good enough in past, so it should still be good enough now." Wrong! You don't get to decide what people call themselves -- THEY do.

  • @Tuxster3 Right on, People in a group are the ones who decide what they call themselves. "Indian" for example is not politically correct for Native Americans or Canada's aboriginal people, but when and if some choose to refer to THEMSELVES as that, it is their choice.

  • @Juliemorgana Thanks!

  • @Tuxster3 Where are you from? "Blacks" is a commonly accepted, albeit maybe not 100% politically correct, label in US politics.

  • @jsday187 I think you were reading my post "too hard", because you missed the point of it. I was speaking in the VOICE of a person that purports to hate what they see as "politically correct" use of references. Re-read what I wrote. Let me make it more clear to you. At one time, Japanese-Americans were referred to as "nips" or "japs". Thankfully, this is no longer the case. My point is a no one else gets to decide what OTHERS call themselves. Is it clear now?

  • @Tuxster3 Well, in my opinion, since the governing powers in today's society have made life without, what are in fact, simple "divide and conquer" tactics, seem untenable, it is often seems necessary (this is by design ) to divide society into groups. In this context referring to a group based on skin color is ideal because it is both factual and easily visualized. If a so-called group should decide what to call themselves should it be by unanimous (read 100% vote) decision of the entire group?

  • @Tuxster3 If not, what one person can truly make claim to represent the wishes of the group in it's entirety? For instance, I am a person, black of skin, who has likely not had a common ancestor from the African continent in as long as time as many white-skinned people, and yet many people, in an effort to appear 100% politically correct, will refer to me as an African-American. I would my prefer that, in the spirit of truth, if I must be grouped, the name be factual, not misleading.

  • I hope I am able to articulate discussions like Ron Paul when I am at his age.

  • I want to believe in him. I'm putting energy into change but I really feel the votes don't count man Smh its unfortunate

  • Ethics mean everything to this man.

  • Just listen to the words of ron paul, and stop your bickering.....ron paul 2012

  • wolf and cnn gets paid by the jews..jews wants to kill the muslims back in Israle and steal tax payer money to make corporate profits..most corporate bosses are Jews (Goldman Sach for example).. Ron Paul don't want war...so he is against killing innocent people --which is exactly what wolf is trying to prevent by questioning Ron Paul about his character, racism and what not

  • he kinda reminds me of kennedy,i don't know why ...

  • @kev1nmcc He's a long, long way from a Keddedy. ron paul prefers a ME society as opposed to RFK or JFK's WE society. And, ron paul doesn't accept evolution and he called human-caused climate change a "hoax". It apparently doesn't matter to him that no respected scientific institution or studies support his opinion. It's a rejection of reality. Our future generations should NOT be put at risk for the sake of this guy's "free" market philosophy. Our habitat is degrading. The "free" market COSTS!

  • @ReduceGHGs Go ahead and say it... "Bahhhh!" Cause thats what you sound like... a sheep. Keep distroting Ron Pauls ideas and the things hes said even after watching this video which puts perspective of another popular lie about this great man.

  • @TrackStarUSF No "Bahhhh" on rp from me. Hear it from his own lips here on YouTube.  He's a climate change denier, he doesn't accept evolution, and he's an advocate for more deregulation. He's dead wrong on all three and yes, not addressing climate change puts our future generations at risk. You have a credible argument to the contrary. No guessing why.

  • @ReduceGHGs You do know the difference between scientific fact and theory right? You do know that there are edited videos of his quotes designed to make him look crazy on the topic right?

    Learn to science please.

  • @TrackStarUSF Definitions. Common day-to-day language we often use 'theory' generally to mean a hunch - an unsupported idea, something that had yet to be tested, or one with only tenuous support ." Eventually "theories" often become very well supported and accepted among the experts that study the issue. At some point we can call them facts. Evolution and Climate Change are so well supported and contrary evidence is so weak, they are facts.

    Learn to science please." What does that mean?

  • @ReduceGHGs Sorry, but thats not correct. Have you ever heard of people arguing over the LAW of gravity? No, because its been proven. The theory of evolution and the theory of climate change/global warming are called theories because they haven't been proven yet. If you watch the real Ron Paul video on his statements about the theory of evolution with that in mind you will realize that he recognizes it as a theory. If you do research you will fine quit a few examples were evolution is disproven.

  • @TrackStarUSF Science never resolves anything 100%. We haven't the capacity or tools to go that far. If that's what you want for "proof" then your expectations are unrealistic. And yes, there are questions about gravity that still generate debate.

    Evolution, with over 150 yrs of science, is factual; it occurred/occurs. As with climate change there is room to debate the details but the underlying concepts are indeed factual. Sorry, we evolved and now we warm (deteriorate) the biosphere. Facts.

  • @ReduceGHGs And this is the ignorance of the American people that will prevent us from having the greatest president since Jefferson. Sir, please, if you consider yourself an intellect please do your homework. The points you are making are asinine. I know this because I am a student of the sciences. I am currently working on a PHD in Genomics. I know science. I know its foundations and I definitely know that the theory of evolution is called a theory for a reason.

  • @TrackStarUSF .

    I never said that voters as a whole aren't generally ignorant. What would be ignorant would be to elect a many that denies science and puts future generations at risk. Yes, THAT would be ignorant.

    You claim to be a student of science. Why then do you support someone that REJECTS science? If you think he's right on the climate change issue, where's your evidence supporting that claim? What about evolution? Want to back him on that too?

    Get real. He's dead wrong on both issues.

  • @ReduceGHGs wiki/Scientific_method

    After you read that and take time to understand it you will understand what I have tried to teach you. When this happens, make sure to vote for Ron Paul.

  • @TrackStarUSF .

    Thanks kid.

    You'll do better as you learn how much you have yet to learn. It's the best lesson.

  • @ReduceGHGs Another lesson, respect. I've referred to you as sir throughout the conversation. You don't have to do the same, but to call me kid because I provided proof for the flaw I pointed out in your argument is disrespectful. Always aim to be the better man. It's a trait you will notice is strong in Ron Paul.

  • @TrackStarUSF .

    Maybe later you'll have earned the respect that you expect. The scientific method requires critical thinking absent in your posts. I don't respect those that have baseless opinions or those that claim to advocate science but reject its well established findings. If you can provide a credible arguments for rp's positions on climate change and evolution, great. Let's see em. I call you a "kid" because you are only 29 yrs and clearly have read little about our only habitat.

    bye

  • @ReduceGHGs Green house gases where to start...scientist on both sides will tell you different things. 30 years ago it was global cooling. And I promise you the omnipotent environmental science hasn't changed much since then. Al Gore's key to global warming is a carbon tax which destroys developing nations chances of growth and personally benefits his investment company (generationim com) that is the main shareholder of the CCX Chicago Carbon Exchange.

  • @Gwhat1935 GHGs, where to start....

    There aren't TWO credible sided to the issue. EVERY respected scientific body sees it about the same on the core issue.

    Gore has nothing to do with the science. He has been telling us what the experts have been saying for over 30 years.

    Carbon Taxes were not his idea neither were Carbon Credits. Know where they came from and why an adjustment to the business model is needed?

    Google: ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES. U. Sankar

  • @ReduceGHGs The video was about racism so that was what that comment was in reference to.

    I agree Al Gore isn't behind the science of it he just pushes it and turned it into an emotional idea for millions of people and now he stands to benifit.

    there aren't credible people on both sides? Have you actually searched for argument against it? Until you've read both you can't say that. And what were the experts telling us 20 years before that 30 years? The next ice age is comming.

  • @Gwhat1935 Profits from Gore's movie and books goes to fight the problem. He is a distraction for some deniers or those that want to continue with business-as-usual. I don't rely on what he says.

    No, there aren't two credible sides. If you really think there are please provide evidence. How about ONE respected scientific body or study that supports that contention?

    Yes, I've done my homework. Here some that you missed.

    Google: Study debunks 'global cooling' concern of '70s - USATODAY

  • @ReduceGHGs

    "Racism" is science, its data and observations;

    Tell me the evolutionary chain of caucasians and tell me who's racist?

    On a purely numbers standpoint in my city most murders are Somalian.

    Or Black people are more likely to have cardiovascular problems than a white person.

    People from China eat more rice than Swedes

    Am I racist to use this information?

    A person should not "be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character" I believe that.