I hate to admit it..but Russian planes are better than our american planes! The B-1 Bomber is nice, but this black jack TU-160 is just awsome!!! Its almost scary how powerful and how much better it is than our B-1 Bomber..Russian engineers are the best in the world!! hands down!!
fortunately for America these things barely fly anymore and recent reports show that there are less then 15 of these in Russia and a few in Ukraine. we can also assume most aren't in flying condition also.
Hardpoints: six external hardpoints for 59,000 lb (27,000 kg) of ordnance (use for weapons currently restricted by START I treaty[43]) and 3 internal bomb bays for 75,000 lb (34,000 kg) of ordnance.
TU-160:2 internal bays for 40,000 kg (88,185 lb) of ordnance, options include:
@natsplit Also, the Lancer is now designed for low-level strikes, whereas the Blackjack is designed for high-speed, all-altitude bombings, primarily high-altitude.
And the Blackjack is a BIG girl. I love this plane to death but honestly I'd be the first to head for the hills if I saw THAT attempting to come at me at 100 feet off the ground!
The Tu-160 isn't a copy of the B-1 really. The B-1 itself is sort of a dud whose replacement almost beat it into service and its precursor is still flying. Between the B-52 and the B-2 the B-1 is the odd man out.
ummm most of you are missing the point the Blackjack is a Russian attempted to copy the Bone its much different than most people think most of this doesn't matter its all about the Bones radar and the purpose is low and fast get on the deck and punch it under radar. payload and top speed doesn't matter its about mission effectiveness in the end any intelligent general is going to take the Bone over the BJ because its more flexible, harder to detect, and easier to maintain
do you know wha B1 was redisegned in low attitude bomber after continuous problems with his engines ??)) it was designed as high alttitude high speed bomber but project was failed. and who told you what B1 "harder to detect" ?)) Tu-160 have radar signature less than B1.
at this moment Tu-160 is a single type of supersonic strategic bomber in world. cuz engines of all B1 deforced and currently they have no afterburners
мдя самолет то хороший но дяде летчику сеачало надо елементарного научиться - выдерживание скорости высоты и направление.. У меня чуть разрыва сердца небыло как он мотылял самолет на подходе...
Ето же тебе не Су-27 а тяжелый бомбардировщик!! И не нужно Дергать РУД вперед-назад, найди подходящий режим и сажай не ципляя жопой бетонку...
Wish I could read cyrilic.. can barely read the instruments in Flanker/LOMAC. Love the design of those Russian planes, don't get me wrong. I think you guys have mean looking aircraft. Love the way a Su looks from any angle!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Tu-160 is bigger, heavier and faster than the B-1B, but the B-1B can carry a bigger payload of weapons
B-1B max payload: 135,000 lbs
Tu-160 max payload: 88,000 lbs
Not only can the B-1B carry a heavier weapons load than the TU-160, the B-1B can carry about TWICE as much as the B-52 Stratofortress and more than THREE times as much as the B-2 Stealth Bomber.
Uh.. the MiG29 and Su27 were an attempt to counter the F-15, my silly friend, and although might be dangerouse in a knife fight, have no capable BVR ability, and would be owned by the -15, -16, and don't forget, the -18. Soviet era avionics are incapable of competing in the modern battlefield. Oh, and then, watch out, here comes the F22, which you can't detect....
Not too sure about that. How many -47's are with active units? The USAF/NASA experimented with that forward-swept wing design decades ago. It was found to be unreliable for a combat aircraft.
That's really too bad. Pretty cool looking aircraft, with a little streamlining(Like a Flanker nose or something) would look killer. How did it crash? Control problem or was it stuctural failure?
Are you sure it crashed?, it was never meant to be produced it was a technology demonstrator, the Russians are working on the PAK FA, which will have technologies from the 2 demonstrator aircraft.
i read an interesting comment about cope/redflag airwar simulations the U.S.A.F. wanted their eagles and falcons to get their clocks cleaned so congress would open up the checkbook and the horrible performance they gave was not reality but do give the su-30 and the I.A.F. credit they are good
Why would they want to show that the Su-30 is good, why not think the opposite, that the F-15 are outdated against the Russian aircraft so that they can push the F-22 project even further!!!
that is exactly what i mean by opening the check book my friend....push the raptor project through even faster...those cope games were in 04.. the first raptor squadrons came on line in 06
Yeah, the F-15 is outdated. The Su and Mig29 were built to try to counter her. She still rules the sky, and has superior BVR capabilities. In an stick puller, the Su might be able to out maneuver her, but then it would all be up to which pilot is better trained, nes pa? USAF rules the skies. Always has, Always will.
But every technology fails in wars like afghanistan and iraq...
Sadly we will see
"which pilot is better trained"
soon in georgia i'm NOT sure but it could escalate to a huge war: russia supporting south ossetia, USA supporting georgia or USA vs. russia?! (it is quite unrealistic at the moment but we will see)
Geez I sure hope not. Hopefully things will calm down very soon. This world has seen too much killing in this century already! Besides, a war between the US and Russia will cause a Global war..as in the End Of Time...
The Tu-160 ia "pretty" and "fast" and "big" but when you have a poor, corrupt. country than cannot facilitate large scale production for an airforce that is effective what's the point??? Just stick to the ballastic nukes and subs to defend yourself. Even though the US has those marked as well. Russia=Easy Prey.
Poor? Russia has surged far since the days following the Soviet collapse. It has payed off international debt, instead of accruing more, it has a large stabilization fund. Its economy has been growing quickly every year since the collapse and is only going to grow further.
Corrupt? Not since the bad old days following the Soviet collpse when pro western forces attempted to destabilize and tear apart Russia and squander away her wealth and resources. If any one has followed current events for damned near the last decade, those days are clearly OVER. Now, corruption? Look no further than Washington D.C. the corruption capitol of the world.
Now, it has recently introduced new aircraft into its inventory, along with missiles, subs and other equipment. The pak fa project will replace a large amount of aircraft. This project is being fully funded. Russia also has ballistic nukes that are road-mobile and thus CAN NOT be targeted like silo based ones. These have warheads capable of maneuvering and counter measures. Even the Pentagon knows better than to call them no threat. If Russia was such easy prey, why will no one dare touch it?
Danda1999 does have a point. Russia's is once again becoming a force to be reckoned with. To be quite honest with you, the F-22 is gonna have some serious competion if we go to war with russia. And this is from an american's standpoint
I could say to improve upon it. If you believe this is simply just a copy, consider that the Tu-160 is almost 30% larger than the B-1, heavier, faster, more powerful and has a greater payload and range. It is the largest, heaviest and fastest(along with Tu-22M) bomber and employs the most powerful engines of ANY combat aircraft put into service.
Yes, it is! The top speed of the F-18 is Mach 1.8 or 1190 mph, the top speed of the Tu-160 is Mach 2.05 or 1,380mph. Not bad for a jet with 10 times the empty weight and 12 times the maximum takeoff weight!
Nice video. Hard landing though.
niceone11987 3 weeks ago
You are fired!!!
you damaged the rear section
Weibkoln 3 months ago
УЖАААС!!! Ты разбился как минимум три раза!!!
Yord1989 10 months ago
I hate to admit it..but Russian planes are better than our american planes! The B-1 Bomber is nice, but this black jack TU-160 is just awsome!!! Its almost scary how powerful and how much better it is than our B-1 Bomber..Russian engineers are the best in the world!! hands down!!
dnlcast2 1 year ago
is it grand theft auto?? lol x]
sony3003 1 year ago
@sony3003 no, it's slightly better but try Lock on or DCS Black Shark if you wan't to have a sim
MiG29MOVT 1 year ago
@sony3003 its fsx
fsxanas90 11 months ago
fortunately for America these things barely fly anymore and recent reports show that there are less then 15 of these in Russia and a few in Ukraine. we can also assume most aren't in flying condition also.
nastystank 1 year ago
lambbo wings xd;)) what game is that?
vladimirrrkasi666 1 year ago
hahaha I love the russian bomber over carrier reference.
soviet176 1 year ago
Yes, I can do that roll. Give it altitude and airspeed and it will roll nicely. Same as a Boeing 747.
Somewhere on the web is a shot of a (I think( a 707 rolling. Very Cool.
AVIDvideoeditor2 1 year ago
@AVIDvideoeditor2 Yeah, Boeing test pilot Tex Johnston rolled the 707 prototype over a boat race in Seattle. Twice.
jpatt1000 1 year ago
I wonder if it can really do that roll, if so it is awesome.
drowsy4 1 year ago
Where in san fran did you land or was it somewhere else??
Good video. thats why i got this lovely jet,it goes fast and does fighter things...
Qantas119 2 years ago
nice video . Perfect music.+5
Bibazavr 2 years ago
Треба підіймати оборонку Росії, бо НАТО зараз сильніше.
ilona943 2 years ago 5
B-1 has:
Hardpoints: six external hardpoints for 59,000 lb (27,000 kg) of ordnance (use for weapons currently restricted by START I treaty[43]) and 3 internal bomb bays for 75,000 lb (34,000 kg) of ordnance.
TU-160:2 internal bays for 40,000 kg (88,185 lb) of ordnance, options include:
2 internal rotary launchers each holding 6 × Raduga Kh-55 cruise missiles (primary armament) or 12× Raduga Kh-15 short-range nuclear missiles
Highlanderswave83 2 years ago
Yeah.
The TU-160 was the most expensive and most feared plane in the soviet union.
It could load more weapons then the B1, it could fly much faster then the B1 and the radar signature was much smaller.
It was superior to the B-1 in every aspect.
natsplit 2 years ago 17
@natsplit key word in that comment is 'was' and the most fear soviet bomber was the TU-95.
BRIANROX1 1 year ago
@natsplit how bout the b52?
MrPennyworth007 1 year ago
@natsplit Also, the Lancer is now designed for low-level strikes, whereas the Blackjack is designed for high-speed, all-altitude bombings, primarily high-altitude.
And the Blackjack is a BIG girl. I love this plane to death but honestly I'd be the first to head for the hills if I saw THAT attempting to come at me at 100 feet off the ground!
RRVCrinale 1 year ago
@natsplit
And it still is.
Heightofhate 11 months ago
The Tu-160 isn't a copy of the B-1 really. The B-1 itself is sort of a dud whose replacement almost beat it into service and its precursor is still flying. Between the B-52 and the B-2 the B-1 is the odd man out.
jrkepler 2 years ago 11
@jrkepler NO no no no the B1 was a american respond to a TU22M. and the the soviets made a better one the TU160.
jijdom 9 months ago
ummm most of you are missing the point the Blackjack is a Russian attempted to copy the Bone its much different than most people think most of this doesn't matter its all about the Bones radar and the purpose is low and fast get on the deck and punch it under radar. payload and top speed doesn't matter its about mission effectiveness in the end any intelligent general is going to take the Bone over the BJ because its more flexible, harder to detect, and easier to maintain
Siman1990 2 years ago
rofl
do you know wha B1 was redisegned in low attitude bomber after continuous problems with his engines ??)) it was designed as high alttitude high speed bomber but project was failed. and who told you what B1 "harder to detect" ?)) Tu-160 have radar signature less than B1.
at this moment Tu-160 is a single type of supersonic strategic bomber in world. cuz engines of all B1 deforced and currently they have no afterburners
Sightless111 2 years ago 3
Красавец.. Amazing song, tell plz who the author
Lyssamania 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Who cares, this is a fake vid! Why do people keep posting this fake crap?
zer0dahero 2 years ago
i thought the 160 was designed as a missile carrier?
kaiser0790 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The B-1B can carry a HEAVIER weapons payload than the Tu-160
max internal+external payload
B-1B: 135,000 lbs
TU-160: 88,000 lbs
airraideagle 2 years ago
Bullshit read wikipedia
Brovenosec 2 years ago
B-1B's can carry approximately 60,000 pounds total in three internal
bays. The are prevented from carrying ANY external weapons by the START
Treaty but they were designed to carry another 40,000 pounds distributed
on eight fuselage hard points.
These hard points have been removed :)
Also its 125,000 lbs internal and external v 88,000 internal,we have yet to see russian specs on the pre SALT Tu-160s
Whiteplane 2 years ago
wow that is a bunch of bulllllll shhhhhiiiiiiiittt t-160 carries at least 160k
kalashnikovowner 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol.. dream on stupid kid)
Sightless111 2 years ago
Нереалистичная физика, зато пиздатая графика
CepexaPNZ 2 years ago 2
Very good plane . The best i would say!
meffer1111 2 years ago 3
Shits all over the B1-B or even the B1-R if it comes out.
XR6Charged 2 years ago
Amaizing plane! Great TrackIR! Brilliant scenery! But you can't fly and aspecially land for your life. thanks for sharing
cookiemonster0626 2 years ago
I love TrackIR! :D
blackice228 2 years ago
what is the name of this game ?=)
Marocain100x100 2 years ago
description people.... its FS2004
blackice228 2 years ago
mine alpha tu-160 won't takeoff straight and it will veer to the right very hard off the runway :S
crazygood150 2 years ago
Check the calibration on your joystick, or your controls sensitivity. It might even be your winds...
blackice228 2 years ago 2
wth blue smoke when touch down anyway g8 vid keep up da gd work
mervynsjy 2 years ago
Dang, they are deleting all music videos too?/
axelbello99 3 years ago
they are just dumb, I think it is a good advertising for their music, whatever
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
I have this for FSX
TonyFirelli 3 years ago
The song is, I believe, "I wish I had an Angel" from Nightwish
axelbello99 3 years ago
well at least it was...
till Warner Music Group deleted it!
I use a song from the audio swap library, I jope it isn't too bad =(
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
I really like the new music.. really fitting. This video should focus on the amazing airplane and the music is just perfect for that.
k0nn0r 2 years ago
what song is this?
twyztted 3 years ago
it would be cool to be able to read i think...
(description, my friend)
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
why not say its in the description or dont reply at all why be an asshole
twyztted 3 years ago
i'm sorry, but you're not the only guy who doesn't reads the description...
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
they should bring out a game about long distance bombers with missions and weapons
cookiemonster0626 3 years ago 2
ooo yes, i searched for a Tu-160 mod for lock on but i wasn't able to find one...
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
мдя самолет то хороший но дяде летчику сеачало надо елементарного научиться - выдерживание скорости высоты и направление.. У меня чуть разрыва сердца небыло как он мотылял самолет на подходе...
Ето же тебе не Су-27 а тяжелый бомбардировщик!! И не нужно Дергать РУД вперед-назад, найди подходящий режим и сажай не ципляя жопой бетонку...
ukieflip 3 years ago 3
Wish I could read cyrilic.. can barely read the instruments in Flanker/LOMAC. Love the design of those Russian planes, don't get me wrong. I think you guys have mean looking aircraft. Love the way a Su looks from any angle!
TheOriginalEAGLE 3 years ago
It isn't that hard to learn, you could also you the transcription on wikipeida...
btw i don't know how the Su-47 crashed it also isn't there on wikipedia, but i once read about that...
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tu-160 sux. B1r owns this class
RUSSIAisPRIMITIV 3 years ago
i m sorry every one, it does
RUSSIAisPRIMITIV 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Tu-160 is bigger, heavier and faster than the B-1B, but the B-1B can carry a bigger payload of weapons
B-1B max payload: 135,000 lbs
Tu-160 max payload: 88,000 lbs
Not only can the B-1B carry a heavier weapons load than the TU-160, the B-1B can carry about TWICE as much as the B-52 Stratofortress and more than THREE times as much as the B-2 Stealth Bomber.
airraideagle 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that looks JUST LIKE B1 Lancer...
Stormchaser2be 3 years ago
Because russians always steal the desingns of usa , Like the lancer , concorde/tu 144 , b-29/tu4 , but still the cockpit is different
riviera1992 3 years ago
What about MiG-29, Su-27, Su-17, MiG-21, Tu-95, Tu-16, Mi- helicopters? *ouch*
And keep in mind: a plane isn't only cockpit and airframe my silly friend...
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
Uh.. the MiG29 and Su27 were an attempt to counter the F-15, my silly friend, and although might be dangerouse in a knife fight, have no capable BVR ability, and would be owned by the -15, -16, and don't forget, the -18. Soviet era avionics are incapable of competing in the modern battlefield. Oh, and then, watch out, here comes the F22, which you can't detect....
TheOriginalEAGLE 3 years ago
watch out here comes Su-47, which is going to whoop your a**
1kera 3 years ago
Not too sure about that. How many -47's are with active units? The USAF/NASA experimented with that forward-swept wing design decades ago. It was found to be unreliable for a combat aircraft.
TheOriginalEAGLE 3 years ago
There was only one S-47 prototype (don't know much about it) it crashed and the project was cancelled
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
That's really too bad. Pretty cool looking aircraft, with a little streamlining(Like a Flanker nose or something) would look killer. How did it crash? Control problem or was it stuctural failure?
TheOriginalEAGLE 3 years ago
Are you sure it crashed?, it was never meant to be produced it was a technology demonstrator, the Russians are working on the PAK FA, which will have technologies from the 2 demonstrator aircraft.
vtkrey 3 years ago
i'm not sure but i heared from that crash but i can't remember where...
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
TU 160 rules! Россия впепед! Найтвиш рулит Америка кал!
AnDron390 3 years ago 3
Aiaiaiaiaiiii
TAISTRYKE
revenez 3 years ago
you´ve landed on a closed runway^^
fhellweg 3 years ago 4
lol nightwish
NSFThunderbird 3 years ago 2
lol
jeka300 3 years ago 2
i read an interesting comment about cope/redflag airwar simulations the U.S.A.F. wanted their eagles and falcons to get their clocks cleaned so congress would open up the checkbook and the horrible performance they gave was not reality but do give the su-30 and the I.A.F. credit they are good
1z1q 4 years ago
Why would they want to show that the Su-30 is good, why not think the opposite, that the F-15 are outdated against the Russian aircraft so that they can push the F-22 project even further!!!
Ersp84 3 years ago
that is exactly what i mean by opening the check book my friend....push the raptor project through even faster...those cope games were in 04.. the first raptor squadrons came on line in 06
1z1q 3 years ago
Yeah, the F-15 is outdated. The Su and Mig29 were built to try to counter her. She still rules the sky, and has superior BVR capabilities. In an stick puller, the Su might be able to out maneuver her, but then it would all be up to which pilot is better trained, nes pa? USAF rules the skies. Always has, Always will.
TheOriginalEAGLE 3 years ago
But every technology fails in wars like afghanistan and iraq...
Sadly we will see
"which pilot is better trained"
soon in georgia i'm NOT sure but it could escalate to a huge war: russia supporting south ossetia, USA supporting georgia or USA vs. russia?! (it is quite unrealistic at the moment but we will see)
MiG29MOVT 3 years ago
Geez I sure hope not. Hopefully things will calm down very soon. This world has seen too much killing in this century already! Besides, a war between the US and Russia will cause a Global war..as in the End Of Time...
TheOriginalEAGLE 3 years ago
What movie make did you use to make this vid??
DevanC105 4 years ago
Default Windows Movie Maker
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
The Tu-160 looks much better than the american Version! Great Design
Question: Why is in the middle of the vid the german message: "geschwindigkeit zu hoch"
Is this the german version of the flight simulator?
serjiggheh 4 years ago 4
Ja ist es, ich bin Schweizer
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
Ah coole sache
Cooles Video man! ;)
serjiggheh 4 years ago
The Tu-160 ia "pretty" and "fast" and "big" but when you have a poor, corrupt. country than cannot facilitate large scale production for an airforce that is effective what's the point??? Just stick to the ballastic nukes and subs to defend yourself. Even though the US has those marked as well. Russia=Easy Prey.
steel763 4 years ago
Poor? Russia has surged far since the days following the Soviet collapse. It has payed off international debt, instead of accruing more, it has a large stabilization fund. Its economy has been growing quickly every year since the collapse and is only going to grow further.
Danda1999 4 years ago
Oh, and has anyone seen Russia's gold reserves lately???
Danda1999 4 years ago
Corrupt? Not since the bad old days following the Soviet collpse when pro western forces attempted to destabilize and tear apart Russia and squander away her wealth and resources. If any one has followed current events for damned near the last decade, those days are clearly OVER. Now, corruption? Look no further than Washington D.C. the corruption capitol of the world.
Danda1999 4 years ago
Now, it has recently introduced new aircraft into its inventory, along with missiles, subs and other equipment. The pak fa project will replace a large amount of aircraft. This project is being fully funded. Russia also has ballistic nukes that are road-mobile and thus CAN NOT be targeted like silo based ones. These have warheads capable of maneuvering and counter measures. Even the Pentagon knows better than to call them no threat. If Russia was such easy prey, why will no one dare touch it?
Danda1999 4 years ago
Danda1999 does have a point. Russia's is once again becoming a force to be reckoned with. To be quite honest with you, the F-22 is gonna have some serious competion if we go to war with russia. And this is from an american's standpoint
DevanC105 4 years ago
huge wingspan.
quiestion is. Do games allow these types of jets to go super sonic.. I want to see some booms!
KrisMorrow 4 years ago
Yes it's possible but with this one you can't see an effect or hear a sound because they didn't wrote a file for it...
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
why do the russians always copy the design of american aircraft it looks like the b1
Tofuman924 4 years ago
Russian answer: Who was first?
American answer: Because it's good...
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
I could say to improve upon it. If you believe this is simply just a copy, consider that the Tu-160 is almost 30% larger than the B-1, heavier, faster, more powerful and has a greater payload and range. It is the largest, heaviest and fastest(along with Tu-22M) bomber and employs the most powerful engines of ANY combat aircraft put into service.
Danda1999 4 years ago
I think that loop would have fucked up the real bird.
MakingGoodVideos 4 years ago
In addition to its size, power, range, payload and speed, it is also amazingly maneuverable for its size weight and class!
Danda1999 4 years ago
yea and it's faster then our (swiss) F/A-18C Hornets!
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
Yes, it is! The top speed of the F-18 is Mach 1.8 or 1190 mph, the top speed of the Tu-160 is Mach 2.05 or 1,380mph. Not bad for a jet with 10 times the empty weight and 12 times the maximum takeoff weight!
Danda1999 4 years ago 2
Hey MiG29MOVT i dare you to do a loop in that thing.
DevanC105 4 years ago
Thats a big bird!!!
DevanC105 4 years ago
No. It would be overstressed...
Paulfrom19370 4 years ago
Where did u dl this bomber
?
fugernut 4 years ago
You can buy it in the alphasim store.
w w w . alphasim . co . uk
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
r u usin trackir?
UFNightWolf 4 years ago
Yes i am.
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
and is this a bomber? or a commercal airliner that lead to concorde?
UFNightWolf 4 years ago
It is a russian nuclear bomber. You can see it in action
Youtube Keywords: tu-160 bombing
MiG29MOVT 4 years ago
nice vid, 2 bad nightwish's vocalest was changed..
guys whats the name of this game??
CrAzyMiX666 4 years ago
Flight Simulator 2004, or simpler name (FS2004)
ComradeLynx 4 years ago
Cooler Film!
Besonders die Stelle ab 3.40 min gefällt mir!
AUDIRS6AVANT 4 years ago
And remember its not an MiG-29OVT xD
ComradeLynx 4 years ago
I thinkt he Tu-160 is actually fairly agile for its size.
TheeYeti 4 years ago
Ooh im having an orgasm
ComradeLynx 4 years ago