@erikrhea i sir, am not a dumbass. or a guido. your probably just upset you have your own emotional problems. im sorry your blinded by ignorance and stupidity. hopefully one day you can mature, but until then ill just call you a fag and enjoy your misfortune =]
lmao I'm sorry. just incredible high and that's the first thing i thought of when i read your comment. For some reason the thought was in the perspective of a stereotypical uneducated African American man. Probably from a low income area stricken with horrible crime and bad credit.
I'VE HEARD ALLEGATIONS , BUT THIS IS A VIDEO EXPO , AND ALL I SAW WAS YOUR ALLEGED BOOK COVER . AT LEAST ONE PICTURE OF A CLEAN STONE ROOM IN THE COAL MINE?
i dont undertand....What else is he trying to say besides humen has live for billions of years? Can someone sum it up in a small paragraph to what this man beleives
there have been many devestations in recent human history alone, not just 1 300 mil yrs ago, the only way walls would be shiny and not eroded is if it got buried fully instantly before weathering or chemical alterations could happen
"the disciples came unot him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of they coming, and of the end of the world? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you." Matt 24:3-4 The scientific community is merely trying to prove every other possibility but a biblical one. Anything that shows light on an early earth is shut out. Look up Problematica. Pray and Search for the Truth
Some of the dating methods can be wrong also. He has either proved that intelligent man was here LONG before average history teaches, or he has proven that the dating methods are wrong, i.e. something dates 2 million, but is really only a few thousand years old. Cremo is also a Hindu agent, and the Hindus teach the Kali-yuga cycles of time, Cremo is trying to back up his Hindu belief as much as anything else, there are always alterior motives for anyone who gets "pushed" into the public light.
@darknesseveraftergod That was debunked 30 yrs ago. This show never questions the claims of it's guests. I read Cremo's book way back in '92 and since discovered that it's almost completely full of BS, shoddy research and nonsensical theories. I distrust any authors who claim hidden or undiscovered "truth". New discoveries win Nobel Prizes, they don't wind up in cheeesy books discounted to 50% from poor sales. Also, the authors almost invariably have religious agendas, not scientific ones.
@ritter89, but the whole point of his book is that it is mostly reporting of the findings of others who have discovered anomalous artefacts in deposits that show them to be impossibly old. How could Cremo invent stuff if he is simply reporting the findings of others? The iron spheres that were found in rock formations many millions of years old for example, are you saying he changed the dating or what? How about the ancient fossil footprints next to those of dinosaurs? Explain please.
EducateRebellion - Fair point re agendas, but you cannot doubt that artefacts found inbedded in coal seams hundreds of feet below ground can't be only a couple of thousand years old, so you cannot intelligently doubt that there has been a scientific cover-up. And knowing that our education systems are run by the same institutions that finance the scientific world, to doubt these things would be naive to say the least. That is unless you are ready to say that geology itself is based on falsehood.
Nobody knows anything. We r all SLAVES. our masters, the elite, r 50 years ahead of us in knowledge, tech., info., secrets & r using all of it AGAINST US! The Sheeple must WAKE UP & DEMAND answers! Have CRITICAL THINKING,Destroy Illuminati - Follow the CONSTITUTION! Our founding Fathers r rolling in their grave rite now! When will Humanity start FIGHTING 4 freedom &2 make this world BETTER? What u believe &what is Truth r 2 diff things! Believe almost nothing-? EVERYTHING!
scottish atheist, sometimes.. even you could be wrong.. ever consider that very possibility? oft times it's the people who seem too eager to show their superior intelligence above all others.. are found to be exactly the opposite.. didn't mean to offend though.. take it easy.. there are possibly more lies out there than we have time in our lifetime to prove..........................
so? lucy its not a humanzee its a monkey still so wheres the physical proof of a real humanzee i ask?? and to correct you i dotn know what kind of idiot told u that about our living race since its clearly shown and stated that humans lived many many years when God Created us. not that i follow the bible but its even written that moses lived thousands of years. the real question should be who corrupted these teachings into making people belive whats not correct? or.. whats a Year in GODS timing?
just think about it.. they found lucy from africa 3 million yrs old but people wanna just shut it down and not talk about it. because they dont want to fathom the thought that civilization started in africa. we have to think about who is teaching us these things and why people cant just use their brains that civilization didnt start 6 thousand years ago.. this is just my opinion with some truth
Utter garbage. Red flags go up immediately upon hearing the standard conspiracy canards "scientists are lying to us!" who IS us? Scientists ARE us too! o_O
"this is what they don't want you to know!"
THEY?
This man produces no credible evidence whatsoever. His excuse for archeologists not accepting it is that "they are trying to hide the truth" I'm sorry, but people are curious no matter where it leads.
Stupid interview and shame on the host for not being as critical as he ought to.
He's talking about some of the 'head guys' in those fields, not everyone. He claims many archeologists have found evidence for our having been around longer but they are ridiculed and shunned. There was one woman in particular, I forget her name but Cremo talks about her, who did an interview talking about how she lost a job, etc. just for talking about her discoveries. He's saying that because of that, many are afraid to explore those possibilities... they don't want their careers ruined.
I'm sorry, bullshit. It sounds strangely like that other wellspring of credulity - creationism. Ever heard of Expelled?
Claims of persecution take the place of evidence. "I was sacked for asking too many questions!" Is another one I should have listed.
The amount of data supporting the standard model of human evolution (and evolution in general) is so well established it would some damn solid evidence to convince anyone otherwise. Sadly for Cremo and his ideas - they don't quite cut it.
Among many others examples Cremo cites, he mentions something from the 1800's (during the gold rush mining) of human remains being found behind geological formations from (I think) 20,000 years ago.
For the most part the people he talks about have both evidence AND claims of persecution.
Have you listened to what Michael Cremo has to say and some of the evidence people have claimed to have unearthed or did you just listen to some of this? Not trying to sound like a douche bag just wondering.
Also, I'm not trying to convince you that all this is fact. I don't necessarily believe it all myself but it's interesting and the reasons he gives for why it would be kept hidden from the public at large makes sense to me.
How long ago was it that people were persecuted for claiming the Earth circled the sun and not the other way around? A theory that was kept from the public and ridiculed. Or even the theory of evolution (which I subscribe to), how long ago was that thought of as bullshit?
"Among many others examples Cremo cites, he mentions something from the 1800's (during the gold rush mining) of human remains being found behind geological formations from (I think) 20,000 years ago."
Um... so? Humans have been around for a LOT longer than 20,000 years mate. Try 100,000 for starters. I think you quoted him wrong, for a figure of 20,000 years is nothing unusual.
Sorry, I meant humans as they are today. I maybe wrong on the time frame on those formations but, for example, remains were found in Illinois I believe underneath the bedrock which was formed loooong before humans were thought to have come over the Barren Straits. Coins have been found from a time long before coins were first used as currency.
And Cremo admits he is not an archeologist. But he says he's done tons of research and found reports from archeologists, newspapers, etc.
If you met a human from about 100,000 years ago you wouldn't notice much of a physiological difference.
That aside, if you go by pure weight of evidence the standard model is safe. Be very wary of a man that writes books and does lectures instead of presenting his evidence to the scientific community like any other person would do. Maybe he has? Does his work stand up in peer review?
He should be convincing the relevant experts, not pandering to the untrained public à la Expelled.
The main point about the remains is that they are in places they shouldn't be considering when they were supposedly left. And he talks about million year old remains, based on the geology.
And honestly I don't know if his views are accepted by many experts or if he's just dismissed out right. My knowledge of Cremo isn't extensive enough to say. It definitely goes along with his claims of this info being held back, but then again one could just argue that's the reason he says that.
Wow, lots of thumbs down for my comments. I guess some people don't like me talking to ScottishAtheist..
Since when are experts actually to be trusted without question? Our scientists have been proven wrong through out history but they're correct now, right?
Honestly! You think such finds that Cremo and Thompson claim to, would be suppressed by today's researchers, scientists, archaeologists, etc. if their claims and so called findings stood up to scientific scrutiny and testing. I think not.
The only expertise that Cremo and Thompson have is in the field of Justknowism, they are Justknowologists, experts in selling books full of BS.
I can understand why information & evidence of that type would be suppressed & ridiculed. If we found proof that civilized humans had been around for millions of years (as opposed to just a few thousand) that would change EVERYTHING. It would involve rethinking everything we thought we knew about our species, evolution, civilization, etc.
I'm NOT telling you this is all fact but there are a lot of things that were scoffed at in the past. Science is a process of continuing growth, it's not set.
I'm not an expert, what I believe is irrelevant. When you have evidence which is agreed upon (it satisfies testing) there is no room for belief because the evidence speaks for itself.
I'd be interested in exactly WHAT artifacts these are, and how they were dated. You have to wonder why experts in the relevant fields seem to disagree with him. Is it because they're "keeping the whole ghastly Truth hidden" Or is it simply that his methods and conclusions are erroneous?
check into Erik Von Daniken, i can say the same as you my friend in regards to all the scientists and archeologists that are on the minority side of things. It only takes one of these many scientists or archeologists to have found something for it to be true, just one. Now in my opinion it cannot be just mass lies.Just one needs to be real.Think about it and look into Von Danikens credibility and findings. A lot of comments are made without research which i find a little ignorant to the subject.
O.o strange that you'd mention Von Daniken's credibility--as if it he has any. The man has been debunked and exposed as a fraud so many times it isn't even worth remembering his name. Perhaps YOU should look into Daniken--as in find out why those who say he's bunk, say he's bunk.
@ScottishAtheist evolution explains human linage well up to the past 500,000 years, then not so much.
Why would three lineages of homo sapiens (sapien sapien, sapian idaltu, and sapien neanderthalensis) exists at the same time? While the functional DNA was from the same source, then "suddenly" diverged 500,000 years ago?
Can you explain how a society that existed around 13000 BC would be able to cut massive stones that have a hardness of 9 out of 10, in perfectly straight lines?
how much credible evidence do you want for ancient technology?
The stones in ancient constructions are too heavy to be moved by cranes today. If you're interested i could give you links to things that you can't explain away.
lol we meet again *twists mustache", but seriously you're replying to a comment that's nearly a year old.
"how much credible evidence do you want for ancient technology?"
Finding some would be a good start. You're not giving proper credit to the ingenuity and persistence of earlier builders. Just because you personally can't figure out how things were built, doesn't mean you can start inventing advanced technologies that have never been seen, and have no evidence even existed.
ingenuity and persistence cant do things that we cant do now. and really thinking about how ancient peoples moved stones weighing hundreds of tons above the treeline in south america might open your mind up to possibilities.
The history we are taught , is a lie.
The Sumerians came from nowhere as in no gradual progression discernible in archaeological records, and gave us all modern civilisation - courts,laws you name it . Did you hear that in school?
@erikrhea i sir, am not a dumbass. or a guido. your probably just upset you have your own emotional problems. im sorry your blinded by ignorance and stupidity. hopefully one day you can mature, but until then ill just call you a fag and enjoy your misfortune =]
MrMcarucci 2 months ago
lmao I'm sorry. just incredible high and that's the first thing i thought of when i read your comment. For some reason the thought was in the perspective of a stereotypical uneducated African American man. Probably from a low income area stricken with horrible crime and bad credit.
MrMcarucci 2 months ago
@MrMcarucci or maybe a dumbass guido like yourself..
erikrhea 2 months ago
@rarosera youza smert azz nigga dawg
MrMcarucci 2 months ago
I'VE HEARD ALLEGATIONS , BUT THIS IS A VIDEO EXPO , AND ALL I SAW WAS YOUR ALLEGED BOOK COVER . AT LEAST ONE PICTURE OF A CLEAN STONE ROOM IN THE COAL MINE?
GIANFRANCO FRONZI SEPTEMBER
9493760 5 months ago
i dont undertand....What else is he trying to say besides humen has live for billions of years? Can someone sum it up in a small paragraph to what this man beleives
John0fusion 6 months ago
IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THE BOOK YOU CAN NOT MAKE AN EDUCATED COMMENT... OK... SMH
KALIEFBARKSDALE 8 months ago in playlist amazing discoveries
IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THE BOOK YOU CAN NOT MAKE AN EDUCATED COMMENT... OK... SMH
KALIEFBARKSDALE 8 months ago in playlist amazing discoveries
there have been many devestations in recent human history alone, not just 1 300 mil yrs ago, the only way walls would be shiny and not eroded is if it got buried fully instantly before weathering or chemical alterations could happen
iseecheese 10 months ago
What if you were to be told that there has been 7 leagues of generations of mankind before the dinosaurs. Because there is evidence
ergo197320031 1 year ago
this reminds me of Lesbians for Idiots
ihateyoujerkoff 1 year ago
"the disciples came unot him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of they coming, and of the end of the world? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you." Matt 24:3-4 The scientific community is merely trying to prove every other possibility but a biblical one. Anything that shows light on an early earth is shut out. Look up Problematica. Pray and Search for the Truth
Jon45914 1 year ago
i believe ther other lifeforms, the universe is huge, i thnk the gorvernment is hiding shit... its all fuked up
MacheteMafi27 2 years ago 18
@MacheteMafi27 The government is not smart enough to be hiding shit. The universe is huge, so huge we will never run into other life.
gregrutz 3 months ago
I was abducted by a weather balloon!
zcg3 2 years ago
me too!!!!
MoostacheCancer 1 year ago
ME TOO!!!!!!!
MoostacheCancer 1 year ago
pretty cool ;]
XxM4RKoZxX 2 years ago
Some of the dating methods can be wrong also. He has either proved that intelligent man was here LONG before average history teaches, or he has proven that the dating methods are wrong, i.e. something dates 2 million, but is really only a few thousand years old. Cremo is also a Hindu agent, and the Hindus teach the Kali-yuga cycles of time, Cremo is trying to back up his Hindu belief as much as anything else, there are always alterior motives for anyone who gets "pushed" into the public light.
EducatedRebellion101 2 years ago
maybe the dating's wrong....but how do you explain the modern human footprints beside a dinosaure footprint??
darknesseveraftergod 2 years ago 2
@darknesseveraftergod That was debunked 30 yrs ago. This show never questions the claims of it's guests. I read Cremo's book way back in '92 and since discovered that it's almost completely full of BS, shoddy research and nonsensical theories. I distrust any authors who claim hidden or undiscovered "truth". New discoveries win Nobel Prizes, they don't wind up in cheeesy books discounted to 50% from poor sales. Also, the authors almost invariably have religious agendas, not scientific ones.
ritter89 1 year ago
@ritter89
what rubbish
matthewkcarty 1 year ago
@ritter89 WELL SAID!
sistwist 1 year ago
@ritter89, but the whole point of his book is that it is mostly reporting of the findings of others who have discovered anomalous artefacts in deposits that show them to be impossibly old. How could Cremo invent stuff if he is simply reporting the findings of others? The iron spheres that were found in rock formations many millions of years old for example, are you saying he changed the dating or what? How about the ancient fossil footprints next to those of dinosaurs? Explain please.
arisuta2 1 year ago
EducateRebellion - Fair point re agendas, but you cannot doubt that artefacts found inbedded in coal seams hundreds of feet below ground can't be only a couple of thousand years old, so you cannot intelligently doubt that there has been a scientific cover-up. And knowing that our education systems are run by the same institutions that finance the scientific world, to doubt these things would be naive to say the least. That is unless you are ready to say that geology itself is based on falsehood.
rarosera 2 years ago 5
who gives a fuck..
VideoNasti 2 years ago
@VideoNasti, not you, I guess, so fuck off!
arisuta2 1 year ago
Nobody knows anything. We r all SLAVES. our masters, the elite, r 50 years ahead of us in knowledge, tech., info., secrets & r using all of it AGAINST US! The Sheeple must WAKE UP & DEMAND answers! Have CRITICAL THINKING,Destroy Illuminati - Follow the CONSTITUTION! Our founding Fathers r rolling in their grave rite now! When will Humanity start FIGHTING 4 freedom &2 make this world BETTER? What u believe &what is Truth r 2 diff things! Believe almost nothing-? EVERYTHING!
TruthKnowledge com
MopDMTBARTL 2 years ago 3
scottish atheist, sometimes.. even you could be wrong.. ever consider that very possibility? oft times it's the people who seem too eager to show their superior intelligence above all others.. are found to be exactly the opposite.. didn't mean to offend though.. take it easy.. there are possibly more lies out there than we have time in our lifetime to prove..........................
farithz92 2 years ago
this is bullshit
Jabulon88 3 years ago
so? lucy its not a humanzee its a monkey still so wheres the physical proof of a real humanzee i ask?? and to correct you i dotn know what kind of idiot told u that about our living race since its clearly shown and stated that humans lived many many years when God Created us. not that i follow the bible but its even written that moses lived thousands of years. the real question should be who corrupted these teachings into making people belive whats not correct? or.. whats a Year in GODS timing?
KnowledgeIsPower11 3 years ago
just think about it.. they found lucy from africa 3 million yrs old but people wanna just shut it down and not talk about it. because they dont want to fathom the thought that civilization started in africa. we have to think about who is teaching us these things and why people cant just use their brains that civilization didnt start 6 thousand years ago.. this is just my opinion with some truth
catfish20inc 3 years ago
3 hundred millions years old??Holy shit..
Thecuriouss 3 years ago
hey could you possibly post each subsequent part asa video response?
clearcutting 3 years ago
Utter garbage. Red flags go up immediately upon hearing the standard conspiracy canards "scientists are lying to us!" who IS us? Scientists ARE us too! o_O
"this is what they don't want you to know!"
THEY?
This man produces no credible evidence whatsoever. His excuse for archeologists not accepting it is that "they are trying to hide the truth" I'm sorry, but people are curious no matter where it leads.
Stupid interview and shame on the host for not being as critical as he ought to.
ScottishAtheist 3 years ago
He's talking about some of the 'head guys' in those fields, not everyone. He claims many archeologists have found evidence for our having been around longer but they are ridiculed and shunned. There was one woman in particular, I forget her name but Cremo talks about her, who did an interview talking about how she lost a job, etc. just for talking about her discoveries. He's saying that because of that, many are afraid to explore those possibilities... they don't want their careers ruined.
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
well said SchmokinJoe.
theanswerman69 3 years ago
One look at your channel page explains your defect.
Tin foil hat time! lol
ScottishAtheist 3 years ago
and your remark about my channel just goes to show the straws you decide to clutch onto. It make you sound like you have no idea.
theanswerman69 3 years ago
@ScottishAtheist, reading your incredibly naive and foolish comment makes me ashamed to be Scottish and an atheist. Away and bile yer heid!
arisuta2 1 year ago
I'm sorry, bullshit. It sounds strangely like that other wellspring of credulity - creationism. Ever heard of Expelled?
Claims of persecution take the place of evidence. "I was sacked for asking too many questions!" Is another one I should have listed.
The amount of data supporting the standard model of human evolution (and evolution in general) is so well established it would some damn solid evidence to convince anyone otherwise. Sadly for Cremo and his ideas - they don't quite cut it.
ScottishAtheist 3 years ago
Among many others examples Cremo cites, he mentions something from the 1800's (during the gold rush mining) of human remains being found behind geological formations from (I think) 20,000 years ago.
For the most part the people he talks about have both evidence AND claims of persecution.
Have you listened to what Michael Cremo has to say and some of the evidence people have claimed to have unearthed or did you just listen to some of this? Not trying to sound like a douche bag just wondering.
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
Also, I'm not trying to convince you that all this is fact. I don't necessarily believe it all myself but it's interesting and the reasons he gives for why it would be kept hidden from the public at large makes sense to me.
How long ago was it that people were persecuted for claiming the Earth circled the sun and not the other way around? A theory that was kept from the public and ridiculed. Or even the theory of evolution (which I subscribe to), how long ago was that thought of as bullshit?
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
"Among many others examples Cremo cites, he mentions something from the 1800's (during the gold rush mining) of human remains being found behind geological formations from (I think) 20,000 years ago."
Um... so? Humans have been around for a LOT longer than 20,000 years mate. Try 100,000 for starters. I think you quoted him wrong, for a figure of 20,000 years is nothing unusual.
ScottishAtheist 3 years ago
Sorry, I meant humans as they are today. I maybe wrong on the time frame on those formations but, for example, remains were found in Illinois I believe underneath the bedrock which was formed loooong before humans were thought to have come over the Barren Straits. Coins have been found from a time long before coins were first used as currency.
And Cremo admits he is not an archeologist. But he says he's done tons of research and found reports from archeologists, newspapers, etc.
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
If you met a human from about 100,000 years ago you wouldn't notice much of a physiological difference.
That aside, if you go by pure weight of evidence the standard model is safe. Be very wary of a man that writes books and does lectures instead of presenting his evidence to the scientific community like any other person would do. Maybe he has? Does his work stand up in peer review?
He should be convincing the relevant experts, not pandering to the untrained public à la Expelled.
ScottishAtheist 3 years ago
The main point about the remains is that they are in places they shouldn't be considering when they were supposedly left. And he talks about million year old remains, based on the geology.
And honestly I don't know if his views are accepted by many experts or if he's just dismissed out right. My knowledge of Cremo isn't extensive enough to say. It definitely goes along with his claims of this info being held back, but then again one could just argue that's the reason he says that.
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
Wow, lots of thumbs down for my comments. I guess some people don't like me talking to ScottishAtheist..
Since when are experts actually to be trusted without question? Our scientists have been proven wrong through out history but they're correct now, right?
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
SchmokinJoe
Honestly! You think such finds that Cremo and Thompson claim to, would be suppressed by today's researchers, scientists, archaeologists, etc. if their claims and so called findings stood up to scientific scrutiny and testing. I think not.
The only expertise that Cremo and Thompson have is in the field of Justknowism, they are Justknowologists, experts in selling books full of BS.
Aegialeus 3 years ago
I can understand why information & evidence of that type would be suppressed & ridiculed. If we found proof that civilized humans had been around for millions of years (as opposed to just a few thousand) that would change EVERYTHING. It would involve rethinking everything we thought we knew about our species, evolution, civilization, etc.
I'm NOT telling you this is all fact but there are a lot of things that were scoffed at in the past. Science is a process of continuing growth, it's not set.
SchmokinJoe 3 years ago
ScottishAtheist
It's beyond me why you have a negative response to your statement here.
Your statement is the most balanced and fair on this comment page.
Aegialeus 3 years ago
so are you trying to say then that NO artifacts have been found that are older that you believe?
theanswerman69 3 years ago
I'm not an expert, what I believe is irrelevant. When you have evidence which is agreed upon (it satisfies testing) there is no room for belief because the evidence speaks for itself.
I'd be interested in exactly WHAT artifacts these are, and how they were dated. You have to wonder why experts in the relevant fields seem to disagree with him. Is it because they're "keeping the whole ghastly Truth hidden" Or is it simply that his methods and conclusions are erroneous?
ScottishAtheist 3 years ago
check into Erik Von Daniken, i can say the same as you my friend in regards to all the scientists and archeologists that are on the minority side of things. It only takes one of these many scientists or archeologists to have found something for it to be true, just one. Now in my opinion it cannot be just mass lies.Just one needs to be real.Think about it and look into Von Danikens credibility and findings. A lot of comments are made without research which i find a little ignorant to the subject.
theanswerman69 3 years ago
@theanswerman69
O.o strange that you'd mention Von Daniken's credibility--as if it he has any. The man has been debunked and exposed as a fraud so many times it isn't even worth remembering his name. Perhaps YOU should look into Daniken--as in find out why those who say he's bunk, say he's bunk.
Authilus 1 year ago
@ScottishAtheist evolution explains human linage well up to the past 500,000 years, then not so much.
Why would three lineages of homo sapiens (sapien sapien, sapian idaltu, and sapien neanderthalensis) exists at the same time? While the functional DNA was from the same source, then "suddenly" diverged 500,000 years ago?
Can you explain how a society that existed around 13000 BC would be able to cut massive stones that have a hardness of 9 out of 10, in perfectly straight lines?
soldog 1 year ago
you again.
how much credible evidence do you want for ancient technology?
The stones in ancient constructions are too heavy to be moved by cranes today. If you're interested i could give you links to things that you can't explain away.
mooners40 2 years ago
"you again"
lol we meet again *twists mustache", but seriously you're replying to a comment that's nearly a year old.
"how much credible evidence do you want for ancient technology?"
Finding some would be a good start. You're not giving proper credit to the ingenuity and persistence of earlier builders. Just because you personally can't figure out how things were built, doesn't mean you can start inventing advanced technologies that have never been seen, and have no evidence even existed.
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
lol
here's a start
watch?v=iH66LramO8U
ingenuity and persistence cant do things that we cant do now. and really thinking about how ancient peoples moved stones weighing hundreds of tons above the treeline in south america might open your mind up to possibilities.
The history we are taught , is a lie.
The Sumerians came from nowhere as in no gradual progression discernible in archaeological records, and gave us all modern civilisation - courts,laws you name it . Did you hear that in school?
mooners40 2 years ago