Really amazing, started with a great idea, identified the issues and made better in a 2nd unrelated field! Security and digitizing books, who would of thought of that!
-"computers cannot read captchas, so typing one proves you're a human."
I'VE NEVER HEARD MORE B. S. in my LIFE.
Down the road there are about 20 billboards next to our local hospital, advertizing how great it would be to get your uterus removed by a robot. That's right--they now have robotic hyserectomies so fail-safe they boast about them on billboards.
And you want me to believe a computer can't read distorted text?
@TheCanadianLemur No, I'm actually using my common sense. Computers can operate on you (roboting hysterectomies at the local hospital), but they can't read wavey letters? Please. They really do think we're idiots. They wouldn't go to the trouble of thinking up this splendid lie if it weren't for a reason.
Wasn't very smart of him to put this information out to the public. Now every time I am asked to fill a re-captcha I always put in "penis", "cock" or "vagina" to hopefully one day read one of these books that have replaced the word "and" with one of the above.
@GFAethna As long as people get educated on this matter then they will know to all substitute the right swear word where possible, use less common ones to pass the filters and it's all good.
So instead of wasting 10s on some random characters, you put in 10s on one word to digitize and 10s for a known word? Doesn't sound like he's solved anything as soon as he had to add a second word.
@jimmayl1 He said in another interwiew that they found out that it takes the same time to type two english words or a set of 6-8 random characters, cause obviously you concentrate longer to get the random characters right, and you can tipe the two words faster. So yo are spending the same average of 10 seconds while contributing with the digitalization.
This new #CAPTCHA / #ReCAPTCHA is a fantastic symbiosis of technologies! Now people in developing countries are digitising books and newspapers! Oh the rest of us are helping, but they're doing it for a living!
I find it always amazing to read some of the moron comments made on Youtube, even on something like this! Some asshole always has to get racist. Some moron thinks that they know more (doubt that VERY much)...the GOOD news, is that you idiots actually watched this and so you learned a very cool thing. You are smarter whether you like it or not. Congratulations!
Can you imagine in the future where androids might be walking around among us, we might have to supply CAPTCHAs IRL, e.g. if we walk into a bank or even on a first date lol.
This is a great idea in theory, but in reality, people will just fuck up the system by substituting one of the words (usually the shorter one) with things such as swears, racial slurs, etc.
Alta Vista may have developed A spammer e-mail applicant prevention program, but Prof. Manuel Blum of Carnegie Mellon University and his PhD student, Luis Van Ahn begin the CAPTCHA project, based on the Turing model, after being approached by Yahoo's chief scientist of the Internet portal, Dr. Udi Manber.
See: New York Times, December 10, 2002, page F, NY edition and "Nova Science Now", June 30, 2009, segment 'Profile: Luis Von Ahn'.
So basically you're forcing people spend their time digitizing a word for you with no possitive impact on security. Clever but I don't think that's such a great feat.
It would be interesting if the results were also used to improve OCR algorithms.
@josealb2 Nobody is being forced to do anything. Web admins are free to not use CAPTCHA if they so choose, and users can just opt not to use a site with a CAPTCHA.
Pretty typical in science i guess. Similar concepts are invented by many people under different names. Depends on how good you market your technology!
Stunning. I can't believe I watched the whole thing - but I'm so glad I did and am happy to know I helped. Now, the question is have they digitized my own books? And will I and other authors be happy about this?
Brilliant! Deserves an award. How about other applications like voluntary Captchas site? Make it an online GAME! If a million people did ten captchas that would be the same as ten million doing one. Kind of like seti@home thing, or pooled computing.
After watching this clip, I am confident that humanity can fix its self in terms of poverty and medicine. It is recyclable and intangible knowledge like this that will help fix the world. 6% of the worlds population is doing something good and they aren't even aware of it.
I do like the fact that you are using captchas to digitize text. However saying that compters can not, or can not do it well; is patently false.
Morphological regularization neural networks make short work of captchas. Using a feature set of around 20, will make any captcha I have ever seen; it's bitch.
However, I doubt that many spammers have graduate degrees in engineering. They are usually scrip kiddies.
It's still not impossible to have a program read the text, there just seems to be a lack of them that can... so far. Or so I've seen, as many programs do indeed fail to read them.
Really great on so many levels. But, in your Utopian zeal for efficiency, are you ensuring that the words that we human techno-slaves are converting for recaptcha for free are being offered back to us for free? Do you charge recaptcha API users for the service and profit from the effort? What is the underlying economic exchange? The NYTimes archive only gives the first paragraph as text. We have to read the rest from the original image, for example. The consumer is likely being duped again.
Good said, I have run into this problem when I was doing research for my history class project.
I found some good old articles in the New York Times but they would charge like 2 or 3 dollars ( I forgot the exact amount) for every article downloaded.
Someone should file a class action lawsuit against reCaptcha demanding that -
1. consumers be paid for their work to date, or
2. all material deriving from human computation remain in the public domain
We would see how quickly the economic model would come to light. If we're doing work, we should be paid. Otherwise, if the company is stealing human computational power in the guise of the greater good and profiting from it, as are their customers, then it is basic exploitation.
The only possible counter-argument is that, since users use sites like Facebook for free, their computation could be construed as a reasonable exchange. However, customers like NYT should be paying reCaptcha for computation and reCaptcha should be paying the sites that use their APIs along the lines of Adsense. Further, users should be notified that they are doing work in exchange for access to the destination site as part of the T.O.S.. I'm all for it, but don't steal the work product.
All the effort this guy made inventing the captcha and now the recaptcha , now he's gonna hafta re-re-invent it when hack-chas find a way around the recaptcha
He answers that specifically at 8:15. You're given 2 words; 1 is the OCR mistake/unknown, the other is legit/known. Then it takes the results of 10 or so users which correctly guessed the known words and then takes the unknown word for granted see as they all entered the same results.
... basically all work done is with English language
I wonder about expanding the possibilities of this project, i.e. more languages
For example, the problem of getting with random system, according to Mr. Luis, is sometimes embarrassing (he did as an example "bad Christians") - but not if you put two words coming from different languages. This would help diversity of cultures survive as well (hope he is reading this).
except the internet is pretty much globally expected to be in English with very few exceptions. The global language is now becoming English, and expecting people to know other alphabets or even be able to type them on their keyboard is going too far in my opinion. Even languages that use the same alphabet have strange nuances not found in English, things like üíóâàè, how do you expect people who are willing to wait when it says "wait" to be able to type such characters?
Probably the best online money scheme ever. a) He makes money from making books digitally b) He gets people to sign up free c) He makes users do it for free. He's a genius!
That makes so much sense. Although, because I figured out that it only needed you to figure out the easier to read work I stopped typing the harder words. This could be a problem if more people figure this out.
Are there safeguards against, for instance, what 4chan did to bypass the Times' recaptchca by entering "penis" for every word, or will the New York Times now have random sprinklings of the word throughout their archives?
Comment removed
362762373 1 week ago
Where are these digitized books posted, have somehow adverts near? that would mean we make somebody richer :D
floringheru 2 weeks ago
Really amazing, started with a great idea, identified the issues and made better in a 2nd unrelated field! Security and digitizing books, who would of thought of that!
DoCWaSaBe 1 month ago
lolsuck my cock fag
anon000000000000000 2 months ago
-"computers cannot read distorted texts"
-"computers cannot read captchas, so typing one proves you're a human."
I'VE NEVER HEARD MORE B. S. in my LIFE.
Down the road there are about 20 billboards next to our local hospital, advertizing how great it would be to get your uterus removed by a robot. That's right--they now have robotic hyserectomies so fail-safe they boast about them on billboards.
And you want me to believe a computer can't read distorted text?
What's their hidden agenda?
1robinsong2 3 months ago
@1robinsong2 You're fucking retarded.
TheCanadianLemur 3 months ago
@TheCanadianLemur No, I'm actually using my common sense. Computers can operate on you (roboting hysterectomies at the local hospital), but they can't read wavey letters? Please. They really do think we're idiots. They wouldn't go to the trouble of thinking up this splendid lie if it weren't for a reason.
1robinsong2 3 months ago
great people with great ideas!
AndYiam99 5 months ago
nosotros sabemos que en guate existen personas muy inteliguentes lo que necesitamos es apoyo de los gobiernos
ReggaeChapin76 8 months ago
@ReggaeChapin76 Tenés razon. :D
rayochapin 3 months ago
nosotros sabemos que en guate existen personas muy inteliguentes lo que necesitamos es apoyo de los gobiernos
ReggaeChapin76 8 months ago
great genius!! from Guatemala. Paisano sos un genio
skadflaksguate 8 months ago
Wasn't very smart of him to put this information out to the public. Now every time I am asked to fill a re-captcha I always put in "penis", "cock" or "vagina" to hopefully one day read one of these books that have replaced the word "and" with one of the above.
MuieBute 10 months ago
@MuieBute Bayesian filters and as mentioned "10" people verification prevents you from doing stupid shit like this.
GFAethna 5 months ago
@GFAethna As long as people get educated on this matter then they will know to all substitute the right swear word where possible, use less common ones to pass the filters and it's all good.
MuieBute 5 months ago
yay he's my professor...
necroskiss 11 months ago
there's 666 likes.
Kakashi3280 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK YOU THANKS FOR RUINING THE INTERNET
linkzzzzzzzzzz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK YOU THANKS FOR RUINING THE INTERNET
linkzzzzzzzzzz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK YOU THANKS FOR RUINING THE internet
linkzzzzzzzzzz 1 year ago
Comment removed
linkzzzzzzzzzz 1 year ago
amazing. Thumbs up, didn't know about this, but this is very smart!
Neo001100 1 year ago
Proud that you are guatemalan:) and very smart btw.
raquelita40 1 year ago
So you're saying I pretty much own 6% of the New York Times?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!? I'll take my cut in large bills please.
wittyunpredictable55 1 year ago
So instead of wasting 10s on some random characters, you put in 10s on one word to digitize and 10s for a known word? Doesn't sound like he's solved anything as soon as he had to add a second word.
jimmayl1 1 year ago
@jimmayl1 He said in another interwiew that they found out that it takes the same time to type two english words or a set of 6-8 random characters, cause obviously you concentrate longer to get the random characters right, and you can tipe the two words faster. So yo are spending the same average of 10 seconds while contributing with the digitalization.
chipech5 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
they are the best...!
Some of my friend on
RENTAFRIEND. COM
told me about this. Really nice.
calhounjohn 1 year ago
who knew signing up to porn websites contributed to society!
LiloPlease 1 year ago 4
how many of you found it really really annoying?... outstanding I invented that... heh
zambatoo 1 year ago
This new #CAPTCHA / #ReCAPTCHA is a fantastic symbiosis of technologies! Now people in developing countries are digitising books and newspapers! Oh the rest of us are helping, but they're doing it for a living!
MikeSynonymous 1 year ago
Awesome! I didn't even know about this.
TheVisibleWind 1 year ago
I met him. I was chosen at school to go and interview him.
superjim3333 1 year ago
Comment removed
thewiredrabbit 1 year ago
Comment removed
thewiredrabbit 1 year ago
I find it always amazing to read some of the moron comments made on Youtube, even on something like this! Some asshole always has to get racist. Some moron thinks that they know more (doubt that VERY much)...the GOOD news, is that you idiots actually watched this and so you learned a very cool thing. You are smarter whether you like it or not. Congratulations!
thewiredrabbit 1 year ago
A smart thing to do would be to make the word they already know harder to read, and try to make the word they don't know untouched
windowsforvista 1 year ago
I *LOVE* smart ideas!
GargamelCZ 1 year ago
Comment removed
splodeyfrog 1 year ago
TYPE "NIGGER" FOR THE WORD THAT THE COMPUTER CAN'T READ FOR EPIC LULZ.
BolnoyBratchny 1 year ago
@BolnoyBratchny rofl yes
Rogerdof 1 year ago
yeah changed the world, and made it fucking worse.
Jesus fuck, now i have to spend more time on writing capatcha then filling in information.
It is bad and should not have been there, it should only show up on bots or wrong people, not the good guy.
Shit is bad
gregor00005 1 year ago
@gregor00005 If they already knew how to differ from a "bot" and a "good guy" then they wouldn't need this technology.
SludgeBomber 1 year ago
@gregor00005 lolumad and stupid
BellowSucks 1 year ago
Can you imagine in the future where androids might be walking around among us, we might have to supply CAPTCHAs IRL, e.g. if we walk into a bank or even on a first date lol.
m4r71nk 1 year ago
@m4r71nk So you think you're too good for robosex? Fine more for me...
Coachramsies 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck that we are not even getting paid by doing this. My suggestion would be to boycott by substituing the 2nd word with nigger.
cshcrazy 1 year ago 9
@cshcrazy As I heard it, you can't know which one of them is the 'first' (known) and which is the other (digitalized).
UserHuge 6 months ago
This is a great idea in theory, but in reality, people will just fuck up the system by substituting one of the words (usually the shorter one) with things such as swears, racial slurs, etc.
ThisIsArtem 1 year ago
@ThisIsArtem
the vast majority of people are oblivious to reCaptcha. only the people in the know will do that, such as /b/ tards.
BolnoyBratchny 1 year ago
That's pretty cool.
Sposchy 1 year ago
Thank You for sharing.
Katieonealbrown 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check my channel for free movies at fast speeds you wont be disspointed movietorrents[dot][org]
S2KMW2 1 year ago
you make money and also you advertise it time spent for something good for humanity. yea this is evil genius :D:D that's what i thought
ComplexStudios 1 year ago
this guy knows how to make money LMAO
ComplexStudios 1 year ago
@ComplexStudios he's digitalizing old books and giving them out for free, how is he making money?
Gongomm 1 year ago
.. which is a very popular site for nerds (like me) ...
* nobody's laughing *
:P
logicfight 1 year ago
wow thats cool
krackherback 1 year ago
Comment removed
djjiggler 1 year ago
now ... i love (re)captchas !!!
nullphp 2 years ago
Ms/Mr. josealb2 -
REGARDING: OCR improvements, see "Teaching computers to read: Google acquires reCAPTCHA [from Luis Van Ahn]" at googleblog, blogspot.
pam000damonium 2 years ago
Mr/Ms QuintupleD:
Alta Vista may have developed A spammer e-mail applicant prevention program, but Prof. Manuel Blum of Carnegie Mellon University and his PhD student, Luis Van Ahn begin the CAPTCHA project, based on the Turing model, after being approached by Yahoo's chief scientist of the Internet portal, Dr. Udi Manber.
See: New York Times, December 10, 2002, page F, NY edition and "Nova Science Now", June 30, 2009, segment 'Profile: Luis Von Ahn'.
Can you share your citations?
pam000damonium 2 years ago
So basically you're forcing people spend their time digitizing a word for you with no possitive impact on security. Clever but I don't think that's such a great feat.
It would be interesting if the results were also used to improve OCR algorithms.
josealb2 2 years ago
@josealb2 Nobody is being forced to do anything. Web admins are free to not use CAPTCHA if they so choose, and users can just opt not to use a site with a CAPTCHA.
MasterDinadan 1 year ago
found this via StumbleUpon. Great ideas put to work here, had no clue I was helping out like this!
chrizby2 2 years ago
Pretty typical in science i guess. Similar concepts are invented by many people under different names. Depends on how good you market your technology!
aaairaqi 2 years ago
He did NOT invent captcha. I can't hear it anymore.
Yahoo had it at the end of the 90s.
Bastard!
QuintupleD 2 years ago
He developed it at Yahoo's request. Listen to the talk.
dcmeatloaf 2 years ago
He did not!
Andrei Broder et al had Captcha's at Alta Vista alread 1997, they just did not call it "Captcha". He started early 2000.
QuintupleD 2 years ago
He made a joke. Lighten up.
cgeorge1122 2 years ago
This joke repeated often enough make super "lightened up" people like you believe it. Well done!
QuintupleD 2 years ago
Captcha!
SlimD11 2 years ago
"Excellent, I had no idea what this was about; I watched it because of the high rating - Keep up the great work!" Thanks
Johnnyart2000 2 years ago
love the accent. :-)
XANDERXXZ 2 years ago
Clever fucker [2]
IIvveennss 2 years ago
This is brilliant. Clever fucker, I have to say.
Phazonaddict 2 years ago
Effin Cool! Now that's what I call being resourceful. Beautifully Amazing! WOW!
wdmax 2 years ago
So, in order to make sure that you're not a computer, you'll be used in a manner similar to a computer?
What if YouTube comment submissions used some form of Captchas? or twitter tweets? or cellphone txt msgs? or everyday conversations?!
*slips into coma to dream of electric sheep shaped like clouds which calculate the weather*
hurryupandw8t 2 years ago
And barely anyone will know they are being used, so who cares.
This guy is awesome.
DrFlanigan 2 years ago
OpenCaptcha-dot-org .. I started it, come on now, who's with me?? Any geeks out there??
MrStimpy77 2 years ago
The NY Times is so bad because they actually use CAPTCHA output to write their articles.
volatilegx 2 years ago
This is why nerds RULE. This was so imformative and I'll pass it on.
ginia01 2 years ago
Stunning. I can't believe I watched the whole thing - but I'm so glad I did and am happy to know I helped. Now, the question is have they digitized my own books? And will I and other authors be happy about this?
elainemadsen 2 years ago
the world is your computer
god4334 2 years ago
lately i've been hearing/reading people saying that the NY times sucks, and it's not what it used to be
josh48315 2 years ago
To hell with the New York Times
fwend12345 2 years ago
major dork
peripatetikerQC 2 years ago
6:45 absurd and inpracticable!
Plato, as EMerson once said can mean a thousands, ten thousand things to the world, depending in who reads him...
ThePanegyriccc 2 years ago
As much as I admire Luis, he is not a gifted storyteller I'll tell ya!
No two glories are ever found together usually. He just repeats his speeches in exactly the same way over and over and over again.
Go Luis, you are a brilliant scientist, though not a very brilliant speaker.
ThePanegyriccc 2 years ago 2
I didn't really find anything wrong with his presentation, he was fluent and captured my interest.
You can't argue the time's being put to better use.
Schpudd 2 years ago 31
@Schpudd, he is a gifted scientis nobody denies that, the problem is that he repeats the same speech over and over again.
chinchonchinchon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Schpudd
>>he was fluent and captured my interest.
I think you meant he captchaed your interest.
DoubleGauss 1 year ago
so does youtube use reCaptcha now or is it still on the old one?
anonymous6366 2 years ago
nice idea...
keepitcrisp2009 2 years ago
Brilliant! Deserves an award. How about other applications like voluntary Captchas site? Make it an online GAME! If a million people did ten captchas that would be the same as ten million doing one. Kind of like seti@home thing, or pooled computing.
determinist48 2 years ago 3
He wants to reuse the time of the people by adding an extra word? It sounds to me that he is stealing extra time
g0liat 2 years ago
oh...did he mention they now have access to what we type in web-forms where there are capchas? scary...
fcommmisso 2 years ago
Pure genious. So incredibly smart yet so simple at the same time Love it!
PureAwesome92 2 years ago 4
Bad Christians. LOL
CianLR 2 years ago
1. But now it takes them twice as long to do the captcha.
2. This has been around for years now.
Good work though ;)
jeremystanford 2 years ago
Comment removed
haloman720 2 years ago
It's not always "check word" "book word". Secondly they take an average of 10 people (or whatever number)
jonyboy10000 2 years ago
wow, thats pretty neat
kionay 2 years ago
After watching this clip, I am confident that humanity can fix its self in terms of poverty and medicine. It is recyclable and intangible knowledge like this that will help fix the world. 6% of the worlds population is doing something good and they aren't even aware of it.
Nsways 2 years ago 3
Really wonderful.
sbhusi 2 years ago
One the most awesome thing I've seen.....
amitkgupta28 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It sucks,first of all,sometimes i have to spend 5 damn minutes looking at the picture and thinking "Why the fuck is this word so hard to read".
And it doesnt work.
nodakim13 2 years ago
You must be a bot then.
JerrySinefield 2 years ago 2
Captcha says I am.
So I must be,right?
nodakim13 2 years ago
Yeah, I'm sorry man. You should probably try to get yourself debugged then.
JerrySinefield 2 years ago
superb
ifteebuet 2 years ago
Wow, Excellent.
georgesman33 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dEAth to the CAPTCHA!
Hilariousity 2 years ago
wow. this guys smart!
Nibiru2O12 2 years ago 26
@Nibiru2O12 u can here that in his voice hes a geek...
but so am i :D rock on dude ur waisting ten second of my life :D
Maplemis0 1 year ago
@Nibiru2O12 this is the son of a whore that invented captcha
MrNewyorkslim 1 year ago
does anyone know the name of the song playing at the beginning of this??
yasmile 2 years ago
whats the intro song? I have heard it freakin everywhere but nobody seems to know what it is
opinion56 2 years ago
"Pendulum" -- a free sample from Garageband.
dcmeatloaf 2 years ago
Love his voice.
mrmango786 2 years ago
Brilliant. Thank you.
Michemily 2 years ago 2
I heard someone could decipher the reCaptchas,
KnightSama 2 years ago
this is really cool, but also shows that we need smarter computers)
pinochet222 2 years ago
I do like the fact that you are using captchas to digitize text. However saying that compters can not, or can not do it well; is patently false.
Morphological regularization neural networks make short work of captchas. Using a feature set of around 20, will make any captcha I have ever seen; it's bitch.
However, I doubt that many spammers have graduate degrees in engineering. They are usually scrip kiddies.
oipaloi 2 years ago 4
@oipaloi if that were true, programs to do OCR would never fail.
DusteDdekay 1 year ago
@DusteDdekay
It's still not impossible to have a program read the text, there just seems to be a lack of them that can... so far. Or so I've seen, as many programs do indeed fail to read them.
ShitDizzleTheThird 1 year ago
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. uhgj
GoddardRaines 2 years ago
Wow! This was fascinating! Amazing use of the technology.
YourChessCoach 2 years ago 3
that was a good idea
OsamaPP 2 years ago
After spending some time in their site, I think reCAPTCHA is a great band name generator.
junapedrito1990 2 years ago 4
Or RESTART
rickandrollyou1 2 years ago
I like the guy who waited after the word was WAIT.
jeromewhite2000 2 years ago 2
Super instructional.
I tried it and my reCAPTCHA was: "husband discard"
:)))))))
Hahhaaha
junapedrito1990 2 years ago 2
!!!!!!
reCaptcha
is
truly
awesome
!!!!
greatgregg1982 2 years ago
Comment removed
greatgregg1982 2 years ago
Now if only they could fix the audio recaptchas so it's possible to understand what to type
Stele007 2 years ago
Really great on so many levels. But, in your Utopian zeal for efficiency, are you ensuring that the words that we human techno-slaves are converting for recaptcha for free are being offered back to us for free? Do you charge recaptcha API users for the service and profit from the effort? What is the underlying economic exchange? The NYTimes archive only gives the first paragraph as text. We have to read the rest from the original image, for example. The consumer is likely being duped again.
tuboidal 2 years ago
Good said, I have run into this problem when I was doing research for my history class project.
I found some good old articles in the New York Times but they would charge like 2 or 3 dollars ( I forgot the exact amount) for every article downloaded.
raazstone 2 years ago
Someone should file a class action lawsuit against reCaptcha demanding that -
1. consumers be paid for their work to date, or
2. all material deriving from human computation remain in the public domain
We would see how quickly the economic model would come to light. If we're doing work, we should be paid. Otherwise, if the company is stealing human computational power in the guise of the greater good and profiting from it, as are their customers, then it is basic exploitation.
tuboidal 2 years ago
The only possible counter-argument is that, since users use sites like Facebook for free, their computation could be construed as a reasonable exchange. However, customers like NYT should be paying reCaptcha for computation and reCaptcha should be paying the sites that use their APIs along the lines of Adsense. Further, users should be notified that they are doing work in exchange for access to the destination site as part of the T.O.S.. I'm all for it, but don't steal the work product.
tuboidal 2 years ago
i hate captcha!
StarvMarv 2 years ago
Great idea!
gucker07 2 years ago
nice lol cleeever i need some smarts!!
Allaxxiana 2 years ago
i think i just listened to someone talk about captchas,
buzwazfuz 2 years ago
clever i might go into computer science after this,
Allaxxiana 2 years ago 3
why dont u just pay someone to type the whole book instead of digitising it
Allaxxiana 2 years ago
All the effort this guy made inventing the captcha and now the recaptcha , now he's gonna hafta re-re-invent it when hack-chas find a way around the recaptcha
allergic2kryptonite 2 years ago
He answers that specifically at 8:15. You're given 2 words; 1 is the OCR mistake/unknown, the other is legit/known. Then it takes the results of 10 or so users which correctly guessed the known words and then takes the unknown word for granted see as they all entered the same results.
Rapture2k1 2 years ago
This is super. Very well spoken for such a smart man. What I'm curious is how does the Captcha/Recaptcha program know what the image says?
mchopsky 2 years ago
ANTICAPTCHAHAHAAHAAA
kimedar 2 years ago
... basically all work done is with English language
I wonder about expanding the possibilities of this project, i.e. more languages
For example, the problem of getting with random system, according to Mr. Luis, is sometimes embarrassing (he did as an example "bad Christians") - but not if you put two words coming from different languages. This would help diversity of cultures survive as well (hope he is reading this).
hombrepancho 2 years ago
except the internet is pretty much globally expected to be in English with very few exceptions. The global language is now becoming English, and expecting people to know other alphabets or even be able to type them on their keyboard is going too far in my opinion. Even languages that use the same alphabet have strange nuances not found in English, things like üíóâàè, how do you expect people who are willing to wait when it says "wait" to be able to type such characters?
Zetimenvec 2 years ago
What a great way to get a banana.
waveoflight 2 years ago
very good. everything he presented fit together very nicely
lvecsey 2 years ago
Brilliant
Mattheflamme 2 years ago
this man is a genius!!
orgologo 2 years ago
How does Google do this for Google Books?
oisiaa 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
400,000,000 people, that's probably the biggest cooperative project in the world.
ashconnor 2 years ago
Comment removed
ashconnor 2 years ago
Damn liberal! :D
ichthyo 2 years ago 3
Pure genius.
devilsfan098 2 years ago 4
amazing, you could tell from his voice, he was excited presenting this amazing presentation =)
daz3dpanda 2 years ago 10
I was wondering why I had one that said, "$10,000-$9,000 hike"
Who knows, maybe that was in a book.
Gosh, that's neat.
SarahxJane 2 years ago
Probably the best online money scheme ever. a) He makes money from making books digitally b) He gets people to sign up free c) He makes users do it for free. He's a genius!
KICKERMAN360 2 years ago 2
na, it's called computer science.
xavster 2 years ago 2
It takes more than computer science to put Digitizing Printed Articles and Books and Human Verification together. ;)
KICKERMAN360 2 years ago
It's not a scheme if you're making the world a better place.
DrIce926 2 years ago 4
this guy is a good presenter to say the least
KeenFob 2 years ago 6
that was awesome.
Antipodal 2 years ago 3
That makes so much sense. Although, because I figured out that it only needed you to figure out the easier to read work I stopped typing the harder words. This could be a problem if more people figure this out.
cookiexcmonster 2 years ago
AMAZING!
GLeNss 2 years ago
that is amazing
NonCommente 2 years ago 3
Reddit owns. Such a simple and brilliant idea
MajorPaid 2 years ago
4:04 LOL omg i want to work there
letseatlunch 2 years ago
now we all have to type the word "penis" into all the recaptcha and spam all digitized books with penis!
blueoctober1121 2 years ago
That was amazing.
ohthissucks 2 years ago
great video! I had no idea that so much time was wasted by people putting in captcha's!
krackatraxxx 2 years ago
Very cool....
GasificationMan 2 years ago
Are there safeguards against, for instance, what 4chan did to bypass the Times' recaptchca by entering "penis" for every word, or will the New York Times now have random sprinklings of the word throughout their archives?
annoyingloginssuck 2 years ago
4chan wasn't successful as there are restrictions against something like that happening already in place.
krackatraxxx 2 years ago 2
no im pretty sure 4chan won because moot got voted most influential person of the year and the top voted people spelled out "marblecake"
Thundergo 2 years ago