@KOlive2043 Yes, I take your distinction. It does not in any way fly against any of my thoughts. Our terminology may differ slightly but the net effect is that photons can interact with mass. As such it is probably one of the routes to understanding 'everything' .i.e. How these waves and wavelets interact. I trust this makes sense to you.
@KOlive2043 Hi, now that I've uploaded Video 5, which is my 'raison detre' (spelling?), I would like to make the point that the Magnetic field is still not understood. The children's toy is as much a mystery now as it was when loadstone was discovered. If 'Gravity' is the bending of matter waves, is Electrostatic attraction similar. Only the Magnetic field appears as a complete loop. Perhaps the original 'flow' concept is correct. Does the field only occur in relative electron movement?
@KOlive2043 (Con'td) My view, but I will accept correction, is that the Electron is a totally basic Energy Particle. Neutrinos may be one step down, but of the same order. One Photon or many? At present my main premise is that gravity is the Refraction of the wave which simulates a Gravitational 'pull' but, in fact, is only the bending of the wave as per Einsteins Space Time distortion. All refraction of light is a distortion of the wave in space and time.
@KOlive2043 Yes, to your first paragraph. I do strongly believe, as you, that we need to look at basic proofs in Physics before moving on to the more specific projections that must be made. I find it disheartening that Hawking and others have gone down the path of the S.F. writers in relation to the consideration of time travel.----- In his book, The Universe in a Nutshell, his explanation that the paradox is dealt with by Nature is unrealistic. Credibility in Wormholes appears to be at stake.
@KOlive2043 Very perceptive, if you would allow me to say so. My view is that the electron is totally basic. I originally thought it a spherical wave, a little like a ball of wool but extending out to infinity and loosing field strength. However, I now picture it similarly, but in the form of a barrel wave since it has magnetic moment. i.e. poles.
I cannot visualise it propogating in and out. At the time of creation it would have probably expanded but now 'is'.---- Spinning(?) about a point.
@KOlive2043 Hi, sorry for the delay. I'm opening everything in chronological order and also had to leave the keyboard. Also need my beauty sleep, and oh boy, do I need my beauty sleep.
I did follow what you meant, I digressed at that point. Of course when I mentioned the Wilson Cloud chamber, the deflection of Electrons and rotation of the plane of polarisation, I am also aware of the accepted theories, but these could be as flawed as Gravitons, LOL, explaining Gravity.
@KOlive2043 One model I imagined whilst trying to visualise the Electron was of a Jelly (Is Jallo the American term?) and how could spherical or barrel waves be created to simulate the focal point of this Electron.
Your model could be a better visualisation than mine if the connection point performed gyrations based on a Mobius strip
It's too early to start passing on to you the views of radical Physicists, but if you Google 'Milo Wolff' you will see we are not alone. 90% agreement, not full.
@KOlive2043 Your line of logic is encouraging. I hadn't considered quarks in any detail, it just appeared reasonable to make my assumptions based on my firm conviction that Matter is Energy, and that Energy Electromagnetic. At the time of the Big Bang massive amounts of Energy in the form of photons must have been generated, so why create with Matter as a different entity?
@KOlive2043 I simply don't know. However, whilst I believe all matter is only Energy,
i.e. electromagnetic waves, I speculate that quarks are unstabe waves which can only exist combined with other unstable waves. (Quarks of a different 'colour'.)
The perception of a photon is that it is the simplest form of Electromagnetic radiation. I dispute this and propose that a simple EM sine wave can be considered to be two Circularly polarised waves rotating in opposite directions, each half the amplitude of the wave under consideration. I propose that one of these waves then 'transmutes' into an Electron, the other into a Positron.
@KOlive2043 Yes, I take your distinction. It does not in any way fly against any of my thoughts. Our terminology may differ slightly but the net effect is that photons can interact with mass. As such it is probably one of the routes to understanding 'everything' .i.e. How these waves and wavelets interact. I trust this makes sense to you.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Hi, now that I've uploaded Video 5, which is my 'raison detre' (spelling?), I would like to make the point that the Magnetic field is still not understood. The children's toy is as much a mystery now as it was when loadstone was discovered. If 'Gravity' is the bending of matter waves, is Electrostatic attraction similar. Only the Magnetic field appears as a complete loop. Perhaps the original 'flow' concept is correct. Does the field only occur in relative electron movement?
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 (Con'td) My view, but I will accept correction, is that the Electron is a totally basic Energy Particle. Neutrinos may be one step down, but of the same order. One Photon or many? At present my main premise is that gravity is the Refraction of the wave which simulates a Gravitational 'pull' but, in fact, is only the bending of the wave as per Einsteins Space Time distortion. All refraction of light is a distortion of the wave in space and time.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Yes, to your first paragraph. I do strongly believe, as you, that we need to look at basic proofs in Physics before moving on to the more specific projections that must be made. I find it disheartening that Hawking and others have gone down the path of the S.F. writers in relation to the consideration of time travel.----- In his book, The Universe in a Nutshell, his explanation that the paradox is dealt with by Nature is unrealistic. Credibility in Wormholes appears to be at stake.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Very perceptive, if you would allow me to say so. My view is that the electron is totally basic. I originally thought it a spherical wave, a little like a ball of wool but extending out to infinity and loosing field strength. However, I now picture it similarly, but in the form of a barrel wave since it has magnetic moment. i.e. poles.
I cannot visualise it propogating in and out. At the time of creation it would have probably expanded but now 'is'.---- Spinning(?) about a point.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Hi, sorry for the delay. I'm opening everything in chronological order and also had to leave the keyboard. Also need my beauty sleep, and oh boy, do I need my beauty sleep.
I did follow what you meant, I digressed at that point. Of course when I mentioned the Wilson Cloud chamber, the deflection of Electrons and rotation of the plane of polarisation, I am also aware of the accepted theories, but these could be as flawed as Gravitons, LOL, explaining Gravity.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 One model I imagined whilst trying to visualise the Electron was of a Jelly (Is Jallo the American term?) and how could spherical or barrel waves be created to simulate the focal point of this Electron.
Your model could be a better visualisation than mine if the connection point performed gyrations based on a Mobius strip
It's too early to start passing on to you the views of radical Physicists, but if you Google 'Milo Wolff' you will see we are not alone. 90% agreement, not full.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Your line of logic is encouraging. I hadn't considered quarks in any detail, it just appeared reasonable to make my assumptions based on my firm conviction that Matter is Energy, and that Energy Electromagnetic. At the time of the Big Bang massive amounts of Energy in the form of photons must have been generated, so why create with Matter as a different entity?
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 I simply don't know. However, whilst I believe all matter is only Energy,
i.e. electromagnetic waves, I speculate that quarks are unstabe waves which can only exist combined with other unstable waves. (Quarks of a different 'colour'.)
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
so your saying the high energy photon hits the electron causing it to split into antimatter and regular matter?
deltaforce 2 years ago
Hi deltaforce, no but the question is welcome.
The perception of a photon is that it is the simplest form of Electromagnetic radiation. I dispute this and propose that a simple EM sine wave can be considered to be two Circularly polarised waves rotating in opposite directions, each half the amplitude of the wave under consideration. I propose that one of these waves then 'transmutes' into an Electron, the other into a Positron.
Regards, Frank.
MrFrancisH 2 years ago
Ta!
MrFrancisH 2 years ago