Added: 5 years ago
From: xXPersianxAlienXx
Views: 1,327,728
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6,648)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All those space lice in the picture were a bit distracing, made me itch. LOL

  • Change the title to 'explained' and remove 'overload', erase the bullshit Sereda commentary and you'll have some scientifically interesting NASA footage, nothing more.

  • ok now we know...what nxt?

  • They're not UFOs they're Santa Claus

  • Truth going to someone else's exclusive and secret knowledge and crap is going to those who pay for it. Thats all !

  • this was filmed with a potato ?

  • @VendPrekmurec Dumbass

  • @QPofHighGrade go blow some fat cock idiot

  • @VendPrekmurec The tether incident was filmed in 1996. So.. about the time you were born. Why don't you smoke a bowl and pick up a book. :d

  • @VendPrekmurec Blah blah blah potato blah, quit being a troll and beating a dead meme with a stick, seriously, shut the fuck up.

  • @gorillazhead daj jebi se

  • Apparently the simplest explanation will not do any more, and the government lies to everyone about everything.

    If NASA came out and said they painted the International Space Station white, someone would come out and claim that it is actually blue and there is a huge NASA coverup.

  • I can imagine when this lands on someone else's planet. A huge 12 mile long tether falling from the sky. Lol

  • indisputable proof imo.  those are not 'ice crystals' randomly moving across the screen creating anomalies with light from a shuttle camera. I have read most of the skeptics trying to discredit this video. Ask Gordon Cooper or Buzz Aldrin what they think about this. Two men who have walked on the moon, both of which are on the record stating flat out that extra-terrestrials exist and have been here for a long time. Some of you need to wake up

  • "Tether incident unexpected electric overload." LOL "unexpected" The tether is a 12 mile long conductor moving at over 17,000 MPH in a massive rotating magnetic field. It's 165 miles above sea level where the electrical potential is up around 663,854,440 volts per meter conservatively. How can it be an "unexpected" overload? Did someone at NASA forget that electrical conductors moving through electric/magnetic fields generate current?

  • This would no longer be "propulsion" it would be by Venturi which makes use of A.C to "push" or "pull" with the oscillating wave form of the electricity band.

    I remember seeing things like this as child on Earth. I would point them out to Adults, they claimed I was "imagining", when I asked what they were, I was told they were just "in my eye" .

    The light would break down into smaller particles, and different colours, and the "string" would fly off into the sky when it became long enough ...

  • Looks like someone looking at bacteria in a microsope to me. Nothing looks "outer space" about this whatsoever.

  • @ChrispyDog65 Good observation Crispy Dog...welcome to beginnings of true exobiology...a man who knows LIFE when he sees it. This is macrobacteria in the plasma state. Nobulax will set you all on the right path. Find and read The Cosmic Pulse of Life by Trevor Constable.....there are many new staggering things to discover.

  • they all move in one constant direction and speed...therefore they are debris and dust not conscious ships making pass.

  • @ikijas are you serious? did you watch the same video? at one point they are moving all over the place, different directions and speed, are you blind?

  • @CWBou812 Its Life Captain Kirk,but not as we know it. Massive but primitive unicellular-like organisms expressing themselves in a form of living plasma.Normally invisible,cavort around planets,calcium and fluids in the plasma state,400-600 degrees body temp,reproduce live and die.biological etheric propulsion system,sharp turns like electricity in a wire.Photographed & videoed thousands of times from earth and by astronauts in space. Still considered "unidentified" by primitive earthlings.

  • @nobulax You need to lay off the pipe, they are UFOs. Other then that nobody has any true knowledge or proof of exactly what they are. Mechanical, most likely, biological, maybe so or in some hybrid combination, who really knows for sure. I find it hard to believe they are biological, much too harsh of a environment out in cold space for living things to go fluttering around like its a warm summers day here on earth.

  • @CWBou812 The only pipe i use is copper,pvc&pex. You need to rephrase to "I dont KNOW of anybody that has any true knowledge.." "Mechanical most likely" Ever see an airplane PULSATE or look like an organism? "Hybrid combination" Ever see a coffee maker wilh toenails? "Too harsh enviornment" Tube wormbs live at deep sea vents in hotter than boiling water.Cave microrganisms eat hydrochloric acid for breakfast.Aquire and study "The Cosmic Pulse of Life:Trevor Constable if you really want to know.

  • @nobulax You are right, I should say I dont know if anyone truly has accurate knowledge of this things because you know are damn government sure as hell does. Far as me accusing you of smoking some crack pipe, as long as you say stuff like "Ever see an airplane PULSATE or look like an organism? "Hybrid combination" Ever see a coffee maker wilh toenails?" then I believe you are a bit loony. Never saw any airplane pulsate, and damn sure no coffee maker with toenails. Space=more harsh then earth.

  • @nobulax as you somehow seem to be an "expert" on these things: could it be possible that these "beings" are radioactive or produce radioactivity since there have allegedly been reports of highly radioactively contaminated soils where no grass stalk couldn´t grow for a long time when a ufo had landed on them. extraordinary strong magnetic fields should also have been registered in some cases. do you think that could stem from these creatures ?

  • @cantabri99 I am not an expert. I read THE COSMIC PULSE OF LIFE by TREVOR CONSTABLE in the mid 1970,s as well as his SKY CREATURES: LIVING UFOS. I was able to capture these same invisible creatures on infrared film and saw one in full visibility in the presence of others.For me there is not a shred of doubt that the upper atmosphere and beyond is inhabited.NASA knows well what they are but are part of a group that lie to us about many things.Their plan is to keep us sheeple very stupid.READ

  • @ikijas r u fucking blind?

  • there is 1000's of ufo's and all of them look like (droppa stones),,,,bought this vid 10 yrs ago,,,,amazing...

  • Its LIFE Captain Kirk...but not as we know it. Biological..dimensions unmeasurable...normally invisible,calcium and fluids in the plasma state..intell similar to fish....reproduce..born,live and die...body tempreture..400 to 600 degrees ..ancient...fill all space but cavort around planets..capable of turning sharp corner at high speed like electricity in wire...photographed and videoed thousands of times by humans from ground level and astronauts in space...only a "mystery" to the uninformed

  • This video is absolutely stupid and a total hoax. There's so many of you who believe that we actually have space ships that can go up and film stuff like this. I mean really, everyone knows that people can't fly and we don't have space ships. We need more critical thinking skeptics in order to set the rest of you straight. Wake up people!!!!!

  • I thought space was meant to be dead empty? Seems like theres a party going on up there!!

  • there is no way these are dust particles.

    dust particles, or any particles out of focus are uniform for a reason,

    the blur makes them ROUND, not mostly round, but with a bite taken out of it.

    if you want to bring up the bokeh effect you should explain why these cut out portions are not all facing the same direction.

  • @Whisper6911

    it is actually pretty obvious to anyone who watches without prejudice that the particles or whatever they are are out of focus in the beginning of the film and are brought into focus along with the tether.

  • @Whisper6911 you can tell by observing the transition, but also the fact that they gain detail and lose symmetry in the process.

    exactly opposite of what one would expect when loosing focus.

    .

  • @Whisper6911 We are looking at massive but primitive biological unicellular-like organisms manifesting in a form of living plasma.This is only a "mystery" to the uninformed.To a typical machinehead "ufo researcher"the idea that ufos might be alive and part of nature is hated with feverish intensity.First discovered by brilliant pioneering researcher Trevor Constable in the mid 1950,s "official science" "mainstream media" "nasa" and "ufo researchers"have made sure you are kept ignorant on ufos.

  • @nobulax maybe, but imo until we have a corpse to dissect, it remains speculation.

  • @Whisper6911 Can you produce a corpse of say a lightning bolt...how about the aurora borealis or maybe a rainbow? These lifeforms are simply made of finer substance than we are used to. The vast majority of ufo video shows what looks like globular balls of light behaving just like living organisms. In my opinion the space ship looking ufos are fake. Nobulax will set you folks on the right path to really understanding this subject if you care to. best wishes

  • @nobulax lightning bolts can be produced in a lab, as can aurora.

    rainbows you can create yourself with a garden hose on a sunny day.

    as for the ufo's it remains a theory until it can be confirmed in some way.

    there are many possibilities that cannot be ruled out atm.

  • @Whisper6911 It is only a matter of considering the possibility that lifeforms might be able to exist in a pure energy state.If so,the idea of finding corpses is very unlikely.If life could manifest as a kind of living plasma,specimens would probablly look much like what we see here.They could grow to dimensions totally unrelated to earth life.Just a few years ago high heat and life was "known" to be incompatible.Tube wormbs in deep sea vents live in hotter than boiling water. best wishes

  • @Whisper6911 thanks for you nobulax for your Insistence and your wise comments

  • @0000000NoName0000000 Thanks noname for your support and good spirit in the face of irrational people who like to keep this subject a "mystery"

  • @Whisper6911 , exactly if this was out of focus image defects, then all objects should have the bite at the same side ,

    thanks for your comment

  • if you notice 2:57 to 3:02 they actually change the focus of the lenses showing they re just dust particles in space appearing big cause of focused lens... you can see stuff like this when dusting a pillow in sunlight!! but i don't get how the one appearing @4:22 moves around the tether :O i mean its space.. no wind or gravity.. isn't that supposed to go straight like other dust particles??? :|

  • they are behind the tether , thats almost certain ,

  • Lens artifacts and out of focus particles (likely dust or ice) in low earth orbit (i.e. gravity) which explains the trajectory in some. Those who claim these are miles in diameter, I assume you also believe the tether is at least a 1/2 mile wide, right? Sorry, it's thin as a match stick (2-3 mm). And for the going behind the tether part? Read up on optical phenomenon. Moving on.

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot so why can you see objects, i.e. dust and lens artifacts clearly pass behind the tether, indicating that they were farther away from the camera then the tether, rather then in between the camera and the tether like it should be. Im not saying that its not dust and other stuff, considering we have dumped so much stuff into orbit over the years, but i can clearly see objects passing behind and not infront of the tether Meaning that its not just dust but something else.

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot how does dust change direction, speed, and also pulse and flicker?

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot So you're saying, everything that "seemed to be" going behind the tether is nothing but an optical phenomenon? Funny, coming from "just another crackpot". Moving on.

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot arent you just a cute little skeptic :D

  • @JustAnotherCrackpot how come the artifacts appear after the tether has broken if they are dust or ice? also if it was dust and ice it would all have to be so close to the camera, meaning that there would be a MASSIVE cloud of dust and ice and hence would be thicker and harder to see into, also considering that, if its so close to the lens there is no way they could move in different directions due to gravity.

  • @yugrules "how come the artifacts appear after the tether has broken if they are dust or ice?"

    I think people are falling back on the ice/dust explanation because that is what it typically is. The reason why the particles appear after the tether breaks is because the particles are part of the tether that broke, simple as that.

  • For gods sake! The Pac men are coming, they're coming to get us!

  • Dust hahahaha good one

  • I didn't know that dust illuminates and flickers in space. Wow

  • @Cymbalz4Lyfe Well now you know

  • dust ?! whahahaaaaa

    nothing in space makes turn exept by gravity or energie.

    big dustparicals.........whahahaaa­aaa

  • the static look to all nasa videos are because they put this kinda like lense effect over the camera called snow globe or suming there is a video on utube were a nasa video shows this effect goes of for a couple of seconds then u can see space and the earth really clear then they switch to a camera on board the iss then switch back and the effect is back on again mmh

  • I saw a history channel show back in the 90's

    where they found prehistoric cave drawings of ufo's

    this was one of them, it had that same wedge cut out

  • The tether did not break. The tether was never properly attached as there is no gravity or friction in space to break it.

  • @allclassics gravity and friction are two different things. friction has nothing to do with gravity. now the tether snapped due to overload it caused the material to deteriorate and snapped due to high tension of the tether line. now you don't need gravity to create tension, also gravity and kinetic energy have nothing to do with each other. if that was tha case then the shuttle wouldn't be able to move even if it used it's vernier thrusters and propulsion systems.

  • @Nekito16 But there is no friction in space either.

  • it was from 1992....remember america's funniest home videos.

  • I'm looking for some of the best footage available on the net. If you can think of one off the top of your head that you think I should see please point me in the right direction with keywords to search. Thanks!

  • The so called dust particles are passing behind the teather , which then u could measure the scale of them by the teather..... 1 mile in diameter just a thought.

  • NASA. Never a straight answer. They are bound by the department of defense to not tell us anything in the interest of national security....meaning  they couldnt tell us if they wanted to, which they dont.

  • Aww so angry, he's been anally probed I guess! The alien was dressed just like my dad!

  • why does the tether look all spirally when it breaks in the first footage then the scene changes to this shot and it looks all straight. Just doesn't look right...looks fake to me.

  • @yupyup1562 maybe the energy that it was generating was moving in one direction, and when the tether broke...the momentum may have caused the tether to eventually straiten out? That's all I can think to explain how that may have happened. Who knows

  • you know it kind of looks like orbs people seen in pictures with ghosts...now those i discount because they're usually dust, moths, etc...but when they're considered...it's because they generate their OWN light. this looks like the "real" orbs. spirtis in space? weird? yes, but so is George Bush getting elected..."Twice" lol.

  • is it just me but i swear it kinda looks like sperm zoom in with a microscope?

  • looks like germs to me. video looks like its recording through a microscope.

  • Nasa is supposed to be cutting edge, the highest tech possible. Why do these leaked footage things always use a camera system that's dinosauric by today's standards?

  • @OptifIex good question

  • @OptifIex probably cuz this video was made in the 90's dip shit

  • Of course they are dust particles. It's so funny that people still discuss about this video, hehee.

  • @MrJPI

    So you claim that material can make turns in space ?

  • @OptifIex Because they think that we're drugged up and waste our lives in front of screens like the sheep. Bu they don't get that there are thinking people left on the face of the earth

  • @OptifIex common thinking, man, common thinking...these are very performant cameras...you don't know what you're talking about...

  • @OptifIex it's 1997. cameras have improved enormously since then

  • It is dust particles. Same thing with people who see orbs on their digital camera shots. I went on a haunted tour one time and the guide was making the dust particles in peoples camera shots out to be ghost.

  • with the billions and trillions of dollars that they spent on this program you would have thought they would have at least put it in blue-ray

  • Looks like this is taking place on a microscope slide or in a petri dsh.

  • every time i watch this it just gets better an better, thank you NASA

  • These are massive but primitive biological unicellular-like organisms manifesting in a form of living plasma.First photographed on infrared film in the 1950,s by brilliant pioneering researcher Trevor Constable.From a golf ball to literally miles in dia.,they are normally invisible.Astute but naieve persons insist this video is shot under a microscope.They are MACROBACTERIA. The signature of life is written all over this video. Read The Cosmic Pulse of Life and test the work like I did.

  • @nobulax

    Nope, just incredibly deluded idiots on YouTube who can't spell, and worship charlatans like Trevor Cuntstable, who's actually laughing right now because of the money he gained by selling bullshit to gullible fools like you.

    Don't read that shit kids. Nobulax is a tin foil hat wearing pillock of the first order. He wouldn't know a UFO if it served him a G&T using a 10 mile articulated arm.

    NASA = Never Acknowledge Stupid Assholes

  • @MoronAntidote Agree or disagree with me.....you have still acknowledged me. You are are still the same old MORON-A we know and love. Why would you refer to these mostly intellegent people commenting here as "kids". Are you some sort of elder statesman in your 80,s? Your PSY-OP NASA cover-up SHILL activity is shining thru "kid" . A hapless mechanical (articulated arm) thinker like you cannot penetrate or tolerate biological ufos. Our atmosphere and space beyond is teeming with LIFE.

  • @MoronAntidote Think back to the very first day of school in grade 1 when your mom was waving goodbye from the front steps as you walked a little reluctantly,carrying your weighty books.Although you have spent a lifetime, head stuck in mechanical thinking,her waving arm was not just a biomechanical movement.It was an expression of love&compassion for her little tike heading out into the world all alone.The whole universe is also filled with love and invisible LIVING organisms. Its OK to cry.

  • @nobulax Think back to very first day of school in grade 1 when your mom was waving goodbye from the front steps as you walked a little reluctantly, carrying your weighty school books. Although you have spent a lifetime, head stuck in mechanical thinking, her waving arm was not just a biomechanical movement. It was an expression of love & compassion for her little tike heading out into the world alone.The whole universe is also filled with love and invisible living organisms. Its OK to cry.

  • Obviously dust I don't get what people are freaking on about, note that none of these supposed UFO's change direction or speed, and that as the focus of the camera is changed so are the sizes of the objects.

  • @xMotherx /watch?v=Q2DVeil21gc note that they are actually doing a lot more then just changing speed and direction :) lol "obviously dust" you must think youre just so brilliant dont you.

  • @tca420 Settle down there conspiracy guy, if you want to believe these are aliens go for it, you don't have to get upset that people have a different opinion.

  • @xMotherx the typical trolling "youmadbro"? im not mad or upset :) i was just saying. i(and quite a few others) think people like you that think theyre rocket scientists are really in fact... stupid :) your "obviously its dust" was just legitimately amusing to me. because thats one thing that these objects are obviously not. its got nothing to do with conspiracy.. alien life forms are inevitable. my apologies for getting you all excited there though.. thinking you got someone upset and all <3

  • there is one interesting thing that i dont think anyone has pointed out , that is the grooves on these things resemble the grooves on the ( droppa stones ) anyone familiar with ufology will know what the droppa stones are

  • why dont these things fly close to the shuttle,its all a bit to relative to me

  • don't you really not see that it's micro-organisms in macroscopic view ?

  • There's too many things moving I can't tell what's what.

  • anyway this isnt the be all and end all of ufology,NOBULAX sorry but i dont go along with that space organism stuff ,at 5.11 they are all going in different directions , how strange is that

  • Well, I didn't see any of the spots change directions or anything like that, so it's hard to say that they are alien spacecrafts.

    Could just be particles from the cable breaking, not to mention how much space junk there is up there in the first place.

  • The UFO's are dust particles.

  • Comment removed

  • @easahanhan LOL those are some pretty big dust particles then einstein... whats with that same odd shape of ALL of the objects? and that little dark center? oh and the fact they materialize out of nowhere.. flip around.. change direction.. etc etc. those are some funky "dust particles" i must say.

  • @tca420 google "perspective"

    Look I'm all for conspiracies but you all already have an conclusion and look for evidence to support it

  • @easahanhan lol >.> i am aware of the meaning of "perspective" but thanks :) why dont you go youtube the infrared version of this video(The STS75 "Tether Incident" - FORENSIC ANALYSIS) so you can see even better what these crazy little "dust particles" are doing.. strange huh? if thats what these are is "ice" or "dust".. basically you are saying everything humans think they know about physics is bullshit.

  • @easahanhan Those are some big ass dust particles lol

  • @easahanhan you can tell some of them are passing BEHIND the tether,

  • @easahanhan Dust particles cannot go behind an object 12 nautical miles out in space and remain that size. They would be 12 mile wide dust bunnies.

  • @psychanaut PERSPECTIVE

  • @easahanhan Riiiight...With your amazing powers of perspective, perhaps you didn't notice that some of the objects are clearly passing behind the tether. The tether is 80 MILES AWAY, so how could we see a dust particle passing behind the tether 80 MILES AWAY. Only a complete retard would swallow that. Also, explain how dust particles can make gradual turns, or decelerate, like many of these objects? Explain how dust particles can account for ALL these observations, oh astute one? UFOs, period.

  • @easahanhan dust particles aren't observable moving BEHIND an object that is miles away

  • @easahanhan dust particles that are shown to move BEHIND the tether?

  • @easahanhan Right! And all the dust particles have a hole in the center like macaroni has?

  • @rpdigital17 watch from 2:56-3:02.. See the camera focus? That is NOT the "UFO's" moving at high rates of speed.

    See how the donut hole disappears at around 3:03 and in the focused area, the particles become smaller and less distorted?

    You all are barking up the wrong tree here. There is tons and tons of good UFO footage out there. This isn't part of it.

  • @easahanhan How can a dust particle pass behind the tether? Watch at 3:27-3:31, the object in question clearly passes behind the tether. That must be a HUGE dust particle for the camera to capture it passing behind the tether at that distance. I am not saying it is a UFO, but the dust particle response does not hold water. What say you?

  • @easahanhan So would you give as reference to the better videos?

  • @easahanhan you might be right about that, where or what should I be looking at that would be considered more credible and high quality footage? Thanks.

  • @easahanhan If you would, please explain why you believe the "UFO's" are dust particles.

  • @nobulax Sweet, I'll check it out thank you. Are these things related to Rods?

  • @easahanhan Funny how those 'dust particles' seem to avoid colliding with each other wtih random generated movements. "Some move fast, some slow. Never an unmissed collision. You can't explain that!" -- Bill O'Really. ; )

  • @easahanhan how the fuck can they be dust particles if they pass BEHIND the tether you plonker ? Go back to sleep mate n talk less pish please you people give me a sore head.

  • @easahanhan

    This was filmed with what was available in the late 90's.

  • @easahanhan Dust particles that have a uniform shape? i.e. Circular with a central hole and a small square cutout on the edge of each one? Hmmmm. If you watch the full video analysis by David Sereda, those "dust particles" are estimated to be between 2 and 3 miles in diameter!

    The reason for the grainy video is because the cameras used are capable of looking into the ultra violet spectrum. This is the reason why the "dust particles" are even visible at all. The cameras really are high tech.

  • @DudeLoveAndLight

    Dust particles will have a uniform appearance when they are out of focus (an inherent optical property of cameras). There's nothing new or unexpected about that. If you'll watch the footage Sereda didn't want you to see, you'll see how the particles only become disc-like and similar when the focus/zoom is adjusted. When in focus, they appear much smaller and many appear to tumble as particles do in space (seen as pulsation when out of focus).

    The camera was not UV.

  • Nikola Tesla made something similar, but more effective than this in 1901, research it.

  • (HAS ANYONE NOTICED THIS)If you watch the big ufo or whatever they are come in from the left at 4.22.watch it very carefully,don't blink.As it reaches the top of the tether a small ufo come from above at speed and collides with the bigger one,as it collides it misshapes itself.now,space junk does not misshape and go back to normal shape after impact....anyone out there got any answers???

  • One of the big things flying about is about 2/3 miles in diameter compared to the 12 mile lengh of tether.so there different sizes flying at different speeds and flying at different angles and some hardly moving at all......but what are they and have they been seen since???

  • Amazing footage, only thing i dont understand is this: At the end of the first part you see the tether that Apparently snaps from its holdings, the next thing you see is the tether curling and forming a very dense package. The second footage shows a tether perfectly stretched showing no signs at al it has ever bin curled up. This is very hard to imagine, if something is totally curled up in space it unfold out of noting in to a very unnatural shape. Am i making any sense here?

  • @keepinmindthat .YOUR MAKING ALOT OF SENSE HERE BUD,THE FIRST PART OF THE VIDEO IS TRUE,THE TETHER DOES SNAP AND CURL UP,AFTER THAT IT JUST LOOKS LIKE A SOLID RIGID POLE.THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE AS FAR AS I AM CONCERED.SO WE ARE LOOKING AT 2 DIFFERENT THINGS HERE.BUT WHAT?

  • hmmm the tether is 12 MI long its a bit curled at one end, and 12 MILES on the other curled a bit does that make sense? but really who cares about the thether wtf are the things flying around? I mean I think the world has moved passed swamp gas, pretty much everyone knows aleins are a real ocurance. want proof thumb this up everyone that thinks aleins are real and visiting earth EVERYONE!

  • @geovs20 People's self delusion amazes me because I'm willing to bet that the majority of the world does not believe in the existence of aliens. It's almost laughable, at least it would be if their mass delusion didn't hamper our forward thinking so immensely. That being said I don't think any of that debris are alien spacecrafts. Not a single on of them makes even the smallest of hesitation or change on direction so unless those are all aliens just orbiting us it has to be something else.

  • i think "BankaiIchigo12345" was right the 2nd part of the video looks truely like an microscope!

  • The "Don't film that!" comment in the background just before the tether comes into view is also on the NASA footage I have on DVD that was live streamed during the mission. Just fyi.

  • Comment removed

  • this is Bullshit, where's the porn?

  • Looks like something under a microscope and it's out of focus. That donut shapped artifact is something out of focus. This is a hoax video. The only true part is that this experiment was indeed conducted with a teather.

  • @BankaiIchigo12345 It's not a hoax. Its NASA's footage. These guys call the things out of focus "debris." I have a dvd of the flight and the release of the satellite attached to this tether. I don't see any debris until they zoom in on the tether, as shown in this clip. When they zoom in on the tether, they have already lapped it once around the Earth, and are filming it while passing it with a low light camera which was originally on the mission to attempt to view electron beams.

  • china has no chance to make this in the next ten years maybe even 40 years

  • @USAmilitarypower I'm highly sure they could

  • @TheChrisConspiracy they cant even make a carreir bye there selves fuck even the j-20 is stolen documents from the calf project the mig 1.44 and the f-35

  • It looks like they filmed miniature in an aquarium with small insects/animals and lots of floating particles that look like discs when they're slightly out of focus.. or a bunch of spacecrafts checkin out a 12 mile glow in the dark tether.

  • the question i have is why the fuck arnt any of them passing in front of the tether

  • I wonder what those things look like without the aid of a camera.

  • I will say that if you follow some of the spots after they appear, they change directions and speed. That would be impossible to do if not being controlled or influenced since there is no air resistance in space.

  • Hahahaha. Are you kidding me? Microscopic bacteria? ICE!? Those objects are several kilometers around!

  • @puregenius7112 exactly... but thats those BRILLIANT "skeptics" for you! with their even more "plausible" "explanations" its a bird! its dust! OMG. fucking clowns. youre only helping the government cover shit up by making excuses for them. im sure they love you morons. is there ever a such thing as being a REASONABLE skeptic? or are you all just stupid? half of your fail explanations sound even more pathetic than the original thought.

    well never know the truth. until its right above our heads..

  • It looks rather microscope image of contaminated water and not outer space

  • These were actually proven to be ice cubes that were accidently expelled from the Nasa spaceship during an after party.

  • i have been reading all all of you twerps for the past year bickering over this video. its real dam entertainin. its like a dam war goin on here. i should let you guys borrow some of my fine hand carved wodden revolvers ..why you could pretend to shoot em up & clock one another on the head... Theres more shit goin on the infrared than you guys would rver dream of...i know caus i can see it all kind of stuff. you guys need new f in names nubulax moronantidote yahoybee youre f,n kidding right?

  • @infraredneck1 The wars we are in are because of them though. They did 9/11. The planes were UFOs. They were holograms. There were orbs all over the building. Orbs brought them down.

  • @ella5024 The big wars are dam oil wars and you know it. Deep cover elements of DOF rouge fbi army intel used mossad bag men to man flight schools, airport security buy wtc 6 weeks prior to 911. Dov zakhem wired up real planes for remote control. no passengers though. i do believe orbs could bring em down but nano thermate was found in the wtc dust. o and gravity just wont pulverize half million tons concrete and my dam kerosene (jet fuel) heater still has not melted...gotta go look at orbs

  • These are ancient etheric fauna.Normally invisible Many resemble unicellular microscopic organisms. They are probablly calcium&fluids in the plasma state. 400 to 600 degrees ft. Size from golf ball to literally miles in dia. Intell. similar to fish. Born, live, reproduce and die. Feed on chemical ether that fills all space.Can be captured from the invisible state with infrared equipt. just as in this video.First filmed in 1957 by Trevor Constable. Covered up by NASA to dumb down the herd.

  • These arent UFOs or any other crafts... They are space creatures, actual biological beings in the ultra violet spectrum. They are related to the jellyfish on earth, that also pulsates light.

  • i still think its strange how these things pulsate like that , someone did make a good point though that was ! why do these things only appear flat and not from a side angle

  • @jeff19721000 They are not disc shaped objects.. they are globe shaped. We are looking at a primitive lifeform expressing itself in a form of living plasma. Exactly how they manifest on video is itself a major study. you can throw most of the Newtonian laws out the window. The "hole" in the center is probablly where the most energy is. We are not looking at the whole organism here..just what manifests on video. The magnetosphere, solar wind, cosmic rays camera structure could cause notching.

  • @nobulax good point i never thought of that , globe shaped ! that could be why

  • @jeff19721000 90% of the "Mystery" of ufos is in the character structure of individuals calling themselves scientists, not the subject itself. Todays so called modern science is anchored in mechanism. Like MoronA ,living things are outside his ability to comprehend. Even ufo "believers" hate the idea of biological living ufos with feverish intensity. They want them to be mechanical ships from other planets which they are not. Humanity is still in diapers on this subject,scientists included.

  • @nobulax

    Oi, i'm not a 'mechanist', whatever that means. It wouldn't matter to me if the objects you are so obsessed with were biological or mechanical constructs, so stop making assumptions. I'm not surprised by this, since all you ever do is make assumptions. The fact is there is no evidence that these objects are biological or mechanical. You don't seem to be able to get your head around that, because it's stuck firmly up Trevor Constable's ass.

    Jog on you deluded fool.

  • is this actual, real NASA footage or just a fake?!

  • Nothing is closed to an open mind.