Added: 2 years ago
From: freelanceteach
Views: 28,757
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow spectacular job!!! You were born to teach; I love this!!!!

  • Its like he's stabbing the board!

  • Please go teach at my university! The chemistry department NEEDS someone like you!

  • Why is carbon assumed to be 12 in the calculation of CH2Br2? Didn't you say that carbon could be 12 or 13? i'm really confused... help?

  • @ksoccerz19 Try to watch again at 10:00. I think he mentioned about it. "you will never have more than 1 carbon 13 cause there has only got 1.1% abundance. But all of the bromine are either 79 or 81. These are both very likely.50% chance." hope that helps. Have fun!

  • So much better than learning from my professor's awful Powerpoints...

  • omg he looks like the guy from two and a half men!

  • @ramzwi92 Alan harper!

  • Man i did Msc in 2005 we had to study lot books make it clear. After five years I need to study it again for some reason, you are really helpful and made it so clear from basic. I wish I had a teacher like you during my studies.

  • AWESOME!!!

  • there is part of the video missing! In the last part of previous video (2) the parent ion = 43 and the M+1= 1.4. At the start of this video (3) the parent ion = 56 and M+1= 4.3!

  • There might be some mistakes, but the way it is explained it is really clarifying and if the people new what he is talking about minor mistakes could be forgiven. We are human after all! Thanks for the help!!

  • I'm sorry but this man is wrong multiple times. Here's a list

    1. Parent peak and base peak mix up.

    2. 7.7% means there are 7 Carbons. 7x12(Carbons) = 84, which is already pass your 44 propane peak. 84, not to even mention the hydrogens.

    sorry but i hope this guy is a new teacher.

  • @freshreynolds Pedantry is the plague of education nowadays. There's no point to you trying to prove your intelligence by picking out a non-mistake. It's very clear that he left that up on the board because his trail of thought lead him to giving people an example, which in turn provided for a better explanation. Why don't you try to learn from videos at face value next time, instead of trying to flaunt your nonexistent common sense? Thank you for the videos, they've been my saviors recently.

  • In this video, he said "the parent peak is the big peak". Not true as he explained in video 1. The big peak (tallest) is the base peak. Of course, he could be referring to this specific example where parent peak (peak at furthest left except the for the isotopes) happens to be the base peak as well..

  • you meant "isotopes" at around 2:30

  • it wrks!!

  • this video isn't working for some reason.....

  • yes it is ... im watching it right now ...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more