LOL, U still believe we landned on the moon? The 7 apollo shuttles never left the ground, and the countless lives lost was fake..Infact, I saw Gus talking to MJ the other day, Its true....
can someone please explain why these new landing site photos show a black area around the LZ when every photo ive ever seen always shows non disturbed grey dust around the blast area???????
I don't think it happened, too much fake surrounding it and as its mentioned the radiation would fry any living creature, nasa says it knows of no way to protect a craft from such levels. So who to believe? Its hard to believe someone who fakes the original movies to fool billions of people. lol dirty mother fuckers is what I say and we should dam well know better :P
@kernzyp With the release of these images I'm beginning to think that the balance of probability is that the landings were real.
I don't believe it 100% though because of the fakery in the images and footage from the Moon. It will take a lot before I believe anything government or any of it’s agencies claim.
@Spud4X indeed, dude. the shots of the tracks throw you off guard a bit, but pictures of the objects are useless. i do hope it is true, but my eyes tell me it is not....
@Spud4X i mean there are several landings with video and photos, satellite images, moon samples and on mythbusters they even shined a laser at the moon which if you watch the episode proves it too. what more do you want? a cookie?
With these images, I still less believe th moon landings were real.
Aren't you surprised the way the lander looks on the photos?
I remind you that, at the center of the lander, there was big black hole for the descent engine; no way that it can appear like it does on the LRO photos; and the rover tracks and footsteps of the astronauts should be invisible, too small to be seen from that distance.
spud spud spud innocent lil video guru.. You made one awesome video here of the photos NASA made, truly well edited. Your a great video editor you should put those skills to a real use.. Anyway thanks for an entertaining video.
Also camera focal length and zoom is what determines the size of background items in photos. Just a word to the wise for you to contemplate.
If they had been on the Moon... sites and tracks will be, not considering some minor errors of their technical photograph development, as that pictures presented to the public.
Well that puts pay to "did we or did'nt we go to the moon"....Now can we have some proof that 911 was or was not an inside job?....Bin-laden is really dead?....Starting conflicts in the middle east is not for oil?.....maybe in another 30-40 years new evidence will be released on those subjects....Yippee cant wait
The Earth is about 4 times bigger than the Moon so imagine how big it would appear in the Moon sky. The photograph with the Flag @ 2:27 shows the Earth way too small.
yeah your right about that. the thick buggers put it as the same size of the moon from here ..but like you say its a lot bigger...hmmm never really spotted that before.
the picture was at 1:27 not 2:27. dont know if you did a typo.
@Spud4X No, the earth would not be very big from the moon. Magnification is used to get those beautiful earthrise photos. Here's another one of Earth looking not-so-big. w w w . hq . nasa. gov/alsj/a17/AS17-137-20961HR.jpg
@Zeus0Moose Your link worked here in Scotland David. Many thanks!
I'm like many folk on the Net bro we've been lied to so many times than I'm now skeptical about anything released by government or the agencies it funds including NASA.
I'm not sure that image is genuine, the Earth should be 4 times bigger than the moon high in the night sky.
@Spud4X The thing I hear thrown about a lot is that the moon is really about the size of a pea at arm's length from Earth. The moon looks pretty big near the horizon, yeah, but that's really just an optical illusion. As it gets higher it seems smaller. Earth as shown in the photo I linked is definitely bigger than a pea at arm's length if you were standing on the moon where this photo was taken.
@Zeus0Moose True! But it's not 4 times bigger - I think!
Problem for me is that Russia said they couldn't go to the Moon because of radiation and NASA won't go back. I don't want to argue the point too strongly because I'm uncertain. I'd just say there is a question mark over NASA and it's claims. Remember the worm they thought they found in rock from Mars?
@Spud4X I believe you mean on the camera, they concluded it was the result of someone sneezing into the camera on Earth before the missions. I don't want to argue heatedly either, it eats up time. But just on the VABs, Dr. Van Allen himself said that there were not necessarily lethal, and so they went through it at a certain angle. Russia really couldn't get to the moon because their N1 rocket was a total failure.
@TheEagle597 Well spotted! How did it get there without leaving the nice set of double tracks. I'm sure the release of this is a Psyop on the 10th anniversary of 9/11.
@Spud4X hey bro i personnally don't believe nasa. but this photo is not fake. the wheel track comes from behind. look between 2 wheels front and rear you can see the track. this photo has taken from frontside but the track is from behind. all these photo is maded in a studio they never went to the moon.
the forground is a huge sand. and the background is just a animation looking stupid graphics.the color of for and back ground don't match in every single photo of moon
@karakan1453 You make a valid point bro but I was meaning the satellite photo, not the insert photo. There doesn't appear to be tracks to the LRV's position. There is a dark line near it which ends next to the crater but no double tracks going off in any direction. The single dark line in earlier images is said to be from astronauts walking.
@TheEagle597 Im pretty sure NASA will tell you, just like many others that your view of the wheel tracks is being obstructed by a weather balloon reflecting off the planet Venus.
LOL, U still believe we landned on the moon? The 7 apollo shuttles never left the ground, and the countless lives lost was fake..Infact, I saw Gus talking to MJ the other day, Its true....
thoricha 1 week ago
can someone please explain why these new landing site photos show a black area around the LZ when every photo ive ever seen always shows non disturbed grey dust around the blast area???????
mrx659 2 months ago
It's simple no man has got passed the VanAllen belts.Not even today..any body that know that knows it never happened........
jdproductions1999 4 months ago
I don't think it happened, too much fake surrounding it and as its mentioned the radiation would fry any living creature, nasa says it knows of no way to protect a craft from such levels. So who to believe? Its hard to believe someone who fakes the original movies to fool billions of people. lol dirty mother fuckers is what I say and we should dam well know better :P
MyCosmicPath 5 months ago
bullshit ...gotta call it. we never went....lol
deracinated1 5 months ago
so spud, you believe the moon landings were real, yeah?
kernzyp 5 months ago
@kernzyp With the release of these images I'm beginning to think that the balance of probability is that the landings were real.
I don't believe it 100% though because of the fakery in the images and footage from the Moon. It will take a lot before I believe anything government or any of it’s agencies claim.
Spud4X 5 months ago
@Spud4X indeed, dude. the shots of the tracks throw you off guard a bit, but pictures of the objects are useless. i do hope it is true, but my eyes tell me it is not....
kernzyp 5 months ago
@Spud4X i mean there are several landings with video and photos, satellite images, moon samples and on mythbusters they even shined a laser at the moon which if you watch the episode proves it too. what more do you want? a cookie?
xxuncexx 4 months ago
@Spud4X
With these images, I still less believe th moon landings were real.
Aren't you surprised the way the lander looks on the photos?
I remind you that, at the center of the lander, there was big black hole for the descent engine; no way that it can appear like it does on the LRO photos; and the rover tracks and footsteps of the astronauts should be invisible, too small to be seen from that distance.
hunchbacked 1 week ago
Good one Spud!
TexasRose50 6 months ago
Good production Spud ..
Am wondering why 2 different suits are being used / shown !
netlethe 6 months ago
spud spud spud innocent lil video guru.. You made one awesome video here of the photos NASA made, truly well edited. Your a great video editor you should put those skills to a real use.. Anyway thanks for an entertaining video.
Also camera focal length and zoom is what determines the size of background items in photos. Just a word to the wise for you to contemplate.
Did I mention Awesome video! =)
Jammin4uo 6 months ago
Thanks, love the music!
Peace!
ISENTRY 6 months ago
If they had been on the Moon... sites and tracks will be, not considering some minor errors of their technical photograph development, as that pictures presented to the public.
monitoryou 6 months ago
Why would they release the photos 2 years later????????????
piffpete420 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well that puts pay to "did we or did'nt we go to the moon"....Now can we have some proof that 911 was or was not an inside job?....Bin-laden is really dead?....Starting conflicts in the middle east is not for oil?.....maybe in another 30-40 years new evidence will be released on those subjects....Yippee cant wait
NickTamotor 6 months ago
Litter bugs. :O.
RamsesReturns 6 months ago
The Earth is about 4 times bigger than the Moon so imagine how big it would appear in the Moon sky. The photograph with the Flag @ 2:27 shows the Earth way too small.
Fake!!!
Spud4X 6 months ago
@Spud4X
yeah your right about that. the thick buggers put it as the same size of the moon from here ..but like you say its a lot bigger...hmmm never really spotted that before.
the picture was at 1:27 not 2:27. dont know if you did a typo.
ukparkster 6 months ago
@ukparkster Thick fingures bro :-)
Spud4X 6 months ago
@Spud4X No, the earth would not be very big from the moon. Magnification is used to get those beautiful earthrise photos. Here's another one of Earth looking not-so-big. w w w . hq . nasa. gov/alsj/a17/AS17-137-20961HR.jpg
remove the spaces.
Zeus0Moose 6 months ago
@Zeus0Moose Your link worked here in Scotland David. Many thanks!
I'm like many folk on the Net bro we've been lied to so many times than I'm now skeptical about anything released by government or the agencies it funds including NASA.
I'm not sure that image is genuine, the Earth should be 4 times bigger than the moon high in the night sky.
For me the jury is still out. Respect.
Spud4X 6 months ago
@Spud4X The thing I hear thrown about a lot is that the moon is really about the size of a pea at arm's length from Earth. The moon looks pretty big near the horizon, yeah, but that's really just an optical illusion. As it gets higher it seems smaller. Earth as shown in the photo I linked is definitely bigger than a pea at arm's length if you were standing on the moon where this photo was taken.
Zeus0Moose 6 months ago
@Zeus0Moose True! But it's not 4 times bigger - I think!
Problem for me is that Russia said they couldn't go to the Moon because of radiation and NASA won't go back. I don't want to argue the point too strongly because I'm uncertain. I'd just say there is a question mark over NASA and it's claims. Remember the worm they thought they found in rock from Mars?
Spud4X 6 months ago
@Spud4X I believe you mean on the camera, they concluded it was the result of someone sneezing into the camera on Earth before the missions. I don't want to argue heatedly either, it eats up time. But just on the VABs, Dr. Van Allen himself said that there were not necessarily lethal, and so they went through it at a certain angle. Russia really couldn't get to the moon because their N1 rocket was a total failure.
Zeus0Moose 6 months ago
@Spud4X OH wait, I thought you said rock on the moon. I heard about the worm in the rock, I haven't been following it lately though.
Zeus0Moose 6 months ago
@Spud4X Link isn't working after I tested it from here I see. Try searching "Earth over Boulder" with google. IT should show you the right picture.
Zeus0Moose 6 months ago
So, another fake ? Is this more evidence that no landing occurred?
aghoranathi 6 months ago
Oh please NASA...really? This was released only days after the movie Apollo 18 premiered.
Onlymanolos 6 months ago
Photoshop luna?
ljrow49 6 months ago
Best watched in full screen mode.
Spud4X 6 months ago
8)
nettledned 6 months ago
2:01 wheel track missing, another NASA's fake
TheEagle597 6 months ago
@TheEagle597 Well spotted! How did it get there without leaving the nice set of double tracks. I'm sure the release of this is a Psyop on the 10th anniversary of 9/11.
Spud4X 6 months ago
@Spud4X you are right my friend
TheEagle597 6 months ago
@Spud4X Indeed. Thanks for uploading it clean. Joe Craine couldn't have!
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
@Spud4X hey bro i personnally don't believe nasa. but this photo is not fake. the wheel track comes from behind. look between 2 wheels front and rear you can see the track. this photo has taken from frontside but the track is from behind. all these photo is maded in a studio they never went to the moon.
the forground is a huge sand. and the background is just a animation looking stupid graphics.the color of for and back ground don't match in every single photo of moon
karakan1453 6 months ago
@karakan1453 You make a valid point bro but I was meaning the satellite photo, not the insert photo. There doesn't appear to be tracks to the LRV's position. There is a dark line near it which ends next to the crater but no double tracks going off in any direction. The single dark line in earlier images is said to be from astronauts walking.
Spud4X 6 months ago
@TheEagle597 Im pretty sure NASA will tell you, just like many others that your view of the wheel tracks is being obstructed by a weather balloon reflecting off the planet Venus.
ponchott 6 months ago
@ponchott not wrong, I like it :-)
TheEagle597 6 months ago