why dont they look at stars less than 50 light years away...We can't even travel at the speed of light...so if we find a planet that has all the characteristics of earth...It's impossible to get there anyway...It took 7 months to get to mars..and is light-seconds away...1 light year is like 6 trillion miles...imagine 560...someone please explain why look for the impossible??
@kenniaruiz0226 In this age we cannot go anywhere, even reaching the closest star in a reasonable amount of time is impossible. The point of the Kepler mission is not to find a planet that we can go to, but to establish the frequency of different planet types in our Galaxy.
@kenniaruiz0226 You dont need to have patience and time to travel 560 light years, its been discovered that wormholes in space exist, so technically, its possible to get there faster using some complex system, but sending a slow projectile like a telescope, dont expect it to go through a worm hole
@kenniaruiz0226 the closest star to our own, is 4 light year away, traveling there with all the technologie that we have now, would take several thousands years. We want to know if planets that has liquid water are rare or frequent in our galaxy. so far, its fair to say it is frequent
Although hundreds candidate Earth-size planets (not in habitable zones) have already been discovered, thus, my aspirations of 2 weeks ago have already been surpassed. These are exciting times to be alive.
@ah4fecksake Actually the candidate exoplanets that have been announced by the Kepler team are mostly not Earth-size, roughly 1200 candidate exoplanets have been discovered, however, 54 are in habitable zones and five of those are Earth-size. While this is undoubtedly exciting, it is important not to forget that these exoplanets are still awaiting confirmation. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that at least one out of these 5 won't get confirmed.
@RidasRules77 It represesnts improvement in our detecting methods. Also, when considering a habitable world for humans, we need one with a mass similar to Earth, so that we can experience not too much gravity.
i thought thats plane keplur 20b my friend told me
BlueRain450 2 months ago
why dont they look at stars less than 50 light years away...We can't even travel at the speed of light...so if we find a planet that has all the characteristics of earth...It's impossible to get there anyway...It took 7 months to get to mars..and is light-seconds away...1 light year is like 6 trillion miles...imagine 560...someone please explain why look for the impossible??
kenniaruiz0226 3 months ago
@kenniaruiz0226 In this age we cannot go anywhere, even reaching the closest star in a reasonable amount of time is impossible. The point of the Kepler mission is not to find a planet that we can go to, but to establish the frequency of different planet types in our Galaxy.
SpaceChronologyCom 2 months ago
@kenniaruiz0226 You dont need to have patience and time to travel 560 light years, its been discovered that wormholes in space exist, so technically, its possible to get there faster using some complex system, but sending a slow projectile like a telescope, dont expect it to go through a worm hole
RidasRules77 2 months ago
@kenniaruiz0226 the closest star to our own, is 4 light year away, traveling there with all the technologie that we have now, would take several thousands years. We want to know if planets that has liquid water are rare or frequent in our galaxy. so far, its fair to say it is frequent
maxjiro25 1 month ago
You must go to the Mustafar System, wipe-out Viceroy Gunray.
quietjedi1010101 4 months ago
dang 560 light years away thats far!
xboxed720 9 months ago
no way thats vulcan its just red then that would be chyte
sobowman 9 months ago
May Vulcan Live Long, and Prosper.
NonstopRam 10 months ago
We haven't even examined 1% of the stars in our galaxy. There is almost certainly a second earth out there.
Ramshobraja 11 months ago
Comment removed
thenoodle98 11 months ago
i leaned abou it in skol
dsacks001 1 year ago
@dsacks001 yes Gliese 581 d and g
xboxed720 9 months ago
Although hundreds candidate Earth-size planets (not in habitable zones) have already been discovered, thus, my aspirations of 2 weeks ago have already been surpassed. These are exciting times to be alive.
SpaceChronologyCom 1 year ago
@SpaceChronologyCom there not in habitable zones beuacuse they planet has toixic oasis and they has hotter liquid lava and hotter
they planet not shall habitable zone like lava planet we cant live there but they rocky planet has it and with lava hotter right?
i Question you?
How many mile Kepler- 10b from Kepler's sun maybe over 64 or 45 million mile as venus and mercury is a between with Vulcan
i hope that planet has habitable zones !
UNSCful 10 months ago
In the coming years we will detect hundreds of Earth-size rocky planets, some of which will be found in habitable zones of their respective stars.
SpaceChronologyCom 1 year ago 4
@SpaceChronologyCom Only two weeks ago you wrote that and today they announced over a thousand....deadly!!
ah4fecksake 1 year ago
@ah4fecksake Actually the candidate exoplanets that have been announced by the Kepler team are mostly not Earth-size, roughly 1200 candidate exoplanets have been discovered, however, 54 are in habitable zones and five of those are Earth-size. While this is undoubtedly exciting, it is important not to forget that these exoplanets are still awaiting confirmation. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that at least one out of these 5 won't get confirmed.
SpaceChronologyCom 1 year ago
@SpaceChronologyCom Why does it matter if they are Earth Size? As long as they are habitable?
RidasRules77 2 months ago
@RidasRules77 It represesnts improvement in our detecting methods. Also, when considering a habitable world for humans, we need one with a mass similar to Earth, so that we can experience not too much gravity.
krazykhrisya 1 month ago