@srspower the country has money but they are not allowed a proper army anymore, and its the same with japan. they are only allowed to have a defence force. if they have proper army like the uk or france then they would not be as rich. uk could go to war with japan and germany at the same time and win. america backs them up militarly.
Nah mate thats not accurate with Japan. Japan has a vast army in fact its the second most advanced army in the world. It may be called a defence force, but it is larger and better equiped than the UK's. Honestly, go look it up.
@srspower im in the uk armed forces, im a lance corporal in the royal marines commando. my name is gareth im 25 years old. i have traveled all over the world and have a basic knowledge of the worlds powers and im telling you that japan is not allowed a proper army. we would destroy japan. they dont even have nuclear weapons my friend. neither does germany. i would put a euro fighter against 5 mitsubishis anyday of the week. even on a sunday fella
@nurizeko you idiot. the zionist bankers robbed England and every other country, and now robbing america. Britain didn't give up anything willingly. Such backward notions of robbing the world through fake fiat currency they still cling to though huh? You live in fantasy land
What facts does he not understand? The communists gained territory in WWII, only because of US and British help. Britain then lost its empire. Do you deny those facts?
How the hell in Gods name did Great Britain cause the World Wars? The Nazi's were planning this war way before the British Empire even influenced Europe, they found some new land and based an empire off of Australia and Canada. In fact the gave up their Empire to save the world from German annihilation! It sickens me how people like this old bag can defend Hitler after all he has done! Rot in hell Pat Buchanan!! I'm proud to be British, the saviors of the world! R.I.P Grandad!
@007Influence DOn't be stupid we never sacrificed the Empire to save the world. We mortgaged the empire on a war to save British independence and to stop a hedgemonic power being created on the continent that would overrun the Empire. We never thought that a) we would have to use as many resources and men as was required, b) that our island would actually be at real risk of being conquered and c) that the yanks would screw us in the peace and call in our debts without a softener.
@AresRoar I know it wasn't out intention but the Empire did save the world. We were the 2nd strongest country behind Germany as 1st. We were the 1 country they didn't want to fight!
@007Influence No it didn't, and you weren't number 2. Both the US and Germany had bigger economies than Britain's. The Japanese smashed the empire in the East and Germany left Britain defending our island. The US provided the material needed to win the war from day one to Chiang Kai-shek's China, Stalin's Russia and Britain. Russia was responsible for the most German war dead and the US was responsible for the overwhelming fire power and resources.
@AresRoar British Imperialism was the best thing that ever happened to the world, India and The African countries they annexed said they wished they had never become independent from the U.K, mainly because of all of their financial problems right now and their economy status. If you paid attention in history you would know that America wouldn't be rich without British colonization, by introducing the Industrial age to you! Also Britain was 2nd because they were at the height of their Empire. =/
@00Before you Brits India had consistently either the 1st or 2nd highest GDP in the world, today it is a 3rd world toilet that may go nuclear with Pakistan which you Brits created, not to mention the mass starvations in Bengal under Brit rule. Africa was cut to pieces with disregard for ethnic borders leading to bloody wars through to today, a white brit settler community abusing the native black population & again economic rape as in India.In the US brits gave slavery and the native holocaust.
@007Influence Britain was number 3, your Empire didn't mean shit because both Germany and the US could produce goods more efficiently and under cut your goods in your own colonies. That's why you went protectionist. And also why Germany kicked your ass so badly. If they had fought you one on one you guys would be speaking German. It was only through American material support which began before the war that you barely survived. You Brit loser.
@AresRoar America was 2nd then? That's a laugh because you struggled in a fight against Japan so you had to play dirty and turn it into a thermonuclear war! So Japan surrendered because you were playing a game they didn't want to get involved in! The last thing Germany did was slam us, they planned to invade but couldn't even get past our air force! If you looked it up you might of known that! American support? If it wasn't for Britain you would be speaking German so don't say you saved the day!
@007Influence How did we struggle against Japan. They attacked us in December 1941, after midway in July 1942 the Japs were on island hopping back to the main land and on the run, unlike you Brit pussies who surrendered Singapore to them. And we nuked them because unlike you we don't waste our own lives when we can blast the enemy to hell.
Germany would have conquered you if we didn't provide you with material support. Who do you think was supplying the money, planes and arms? the usa was idiot
@AresRoar And Germany would have conquered you if Britain didn't stop them from conquering Europe! Without one of these countries Russia, America and Britain, Germany would have conquered the world! Yes I'm not disagreeing that you saved us by providing resources and fighting Japan, but you have to respect the fact that without Britain, Germany would have conquered Europe and then would have attacked America like they planned with enough forces by then to kill you 2x over! So don't hog the cred!
@007Influence Hitler couldn't even beat Russia or invade Britain. Both powers were supplied by the USA. He wouldn't have stood a chance against the US. One he'd have to cross the Atlantic, secondly we were technologically more advanced and got the atom bomb first.
The US went into both theatres of was and smashed the opposition, coming out of the war as the most powerful nation on Earth. And lets not forget how well armed the US population is and how we've never been conquered.
@AresRoar You NEVER supplied Russia!? I don't know if your getting these retarded facts from Wikipedia but you only supplied Britain at the end of the war and that's it! The U.K stood alone against Germany and it's allies until the Nazi's invaded Russia which made them join and then Japan blew up Pearl Harbor which made you join. America has only been around for a few hundred years so that's why you haven't been conquered..yet! You only just came out as the most powerful nation from the cold war
@007Influence Ok I'm not going to argue with a retard who doesn't know anything about history or looking up facts. Now little boy I want you to look up the "lend-lease program" and it's deliveries to Russia. You'll find that I am correct and you are as ever wrong.
Wrong again, the US came out of the war as the most powerful and economically advanced nation on Earth. Russia was a distant second, they had to make up for it by stealing our nuclear tech through spying. Yeah so young yet so great.
@AresRoar Yeah but Russia was never supplied by you. Russia transferred them to linked countries who were in the war because they couldn't get or afford supplies directly from America. I don't know who you think you are calling me a little boy because I have studied this at an A grade level and have a pass distinction on it! You and Russia stole technology from each other, and you struggled against them toe-to-toe, except your 'country' obviously wouldn't tell you that.
@AresRoar Dude, let's be fair. Germany had the best equiped and trained military in the world when the US joined WW2. If Hitler hadn't been such a control freak, he would have fucked us over and if Japan hadn't attacked you, Hitler would have crossed the Atlantic to get to you. You came out of WW2 as a super power but you sure didn't go into it as one. But why argue about it? It happened and that won't ever change.
@Jems17 The largest economy on Earth at the time was the USA, the most advanced nation on Earth was the USA- where do you think things like flight, skyscrapers, DC and AC electricity were developed- all in America, then Germany because of racism saw a brain drain to America. The reason we were courted by the Allies was because we were a superpower but we were isolationist, furthermore after WW1 we forced all Europe including the British empire to join the league of nations but we didn't join.
@AresRoar Forced us to join ahahaha don't be stupid you never you suggested it then pulled out and America was not the biggest economy and advanced nation until after WW2 after the profits you made of the war not to mention all the knowledge and technology we Brits gave you as an enticement to send us weapons and food not that we needed it in the end just caused are own downfall i hope china does as you did to us call the debt bang America collapses as you cannot afford it
@AresRoar Britain has invented more things than America, Germany and France combined so your point of America being the most advanced is lunacy during and before WW2 it was only after when you brought all the German scientists and had all the money to experiment as well as the massive population and resources that you took a lead only due to Europe's bad state
@AresRoar also Britain would have made a comeback had the winter of 1946-47 not been so severe slashing £1 equal to $4.03 to $2.80($1.60 today) that with a 10% decline in industrial production that then made the US dollar the top currency without doubt, had that winter not occured you could argue Britain would still have an Empire and be a superpower but then again what does a superpower really mean we have beaten them as nothing more than what we are now
My God! That's the first time I've ever heard defending Poland (or anyone for that matter) against the Nazis as the wrong thing to do! He draws a comparison between Britain's position then and America's now "...everytime we have to stand up we can't appease", if he knew F all about WWII he'd know Britain tried to appease, signed a treaty in fact which Hitler broke. WTF else does he suggest after that?! Got no idea who this no-nothing twat is but I'm willing to bet he's Bill O'Reilly's bum buddy.
Ha ha ha. One country caused everything apparently. That's funny. Buchanan does not know much about history. It's absurd that in America people like him even get interviewed properly on television.
world war 2 is caused by Communism, the SovietUnion, and the ashkenazim jewish marxist mafia. It was not a blunder of Great Britain, it was INTENTIONALLY done the way it was done. Great Britain is a supporter of Communism, just like the Jews in New York who funded Lenin and the massacre of 65 million Christians in the Soviet Union.
Er, i think you will find it was Hitler that caused an unnecessary war, and we sold our empire to fight against him (whilst people like Pat Buchanan sat around with their thumb up their arse and their mind in neutral). Its a good job we did to, as it wouldnt just be Europe and Asia that would be speaking German right now. They were within miles of Moscow whilst fighting on two fronts, imagine if it was just one. This guy is clearly a wanker.
And as for blaming the british for WW2....insanity. Was the US responsible for Japan killing 20 million chinese, because they stopped oil imports to the japanese mainland? Why not blame the french, seeing as their army outnumbered the british 4 to 1?
The reason britain gave up it's empire was becasue it WASN'T MAKING ANY MONEY. It held on to the one piece that was making money (Hong Kong) and let the rest go. The british had had enough of empire (both morally and economically) in 1900, that's why the 1903 invasion of Tibet was massively criticized despite it being a complete military success. Basically, they grew out of it. The empire was in decline long before WW1.
the united states caused WW2 in two ways, first they caused the financial crisis that plunged germany back into economic deprivation allowing hitler to say "the suffering you are experiencing is the jews fault!", hitler could never had done this without the grinding poverty the 1930's wallstreet crash caused in germany. second, america after WW1 took its policy of 'splendid isolation', abandoning europe when we needed them most. Remember, hitler wanted us as allies, we refused based on morality
you idiot if hitler was left to his own devises they would have marched relatively unopposed across eastern europe and turn west. hitler asked the british to become allies before we declared war. sometimes you have to make decisions with your heart not your head. i for one believe we made the right decision and could not care less that we are no longer the power we once were
I think Buchanan's wrong. Britain, in my view, had no choice but to declare war
on Germany after they invaded Poland. Is he saying that Hitler could be trusted? That's a stretch. I believe that Roosevelt wanted to enter the war but was restrained because of political ramifications. The American public were largely against war and isolationist. But Pearl Harbor changed all that. Churchill rejoiced at Pearl Harbor as he knew that the Anglo American alliance would eventually defeat Hitler
anyone who thinks that the west(UK and USA) could have won germany from 1945 (which is likely when he would turn on britain, as it would give more then enough time to take russia) is a fool and a dumbass, not even the USA could win then.
The USSR taking of europe could have been stopped if the US leaders were not so stupid to think that Stalin would leave it alone, i mean, look at it, Churchill wanted to do the attack on the balkans for a reason which is well known and the US wouldnt allow it,
As for "empire to an island", much of the empire was now its own lands, and were giving support as they could, shame that india isnt to good for giving iron or steel huh?
"Churchill wanted to do the attack on the balkans for a reason"--How, why and with what? Fight the USSR and Germany simultaneously or after Germany? Btw, I disagree with Buchanan.
The reason being that should we have launched the major assault from the balans then we would be able to rush north through eastern europe in a pincer against the germans with the russians, but we would also be able to lock the russian forces out of the war, because the americans being americans thought they would be able to convince stalin to give up the europian land he would take in the war, churchill being british didnt trust stalin, 1 turned out to be right and decades of hell.
Launch an assault in the Balkans? That would've been nice but it sounds like it would've been impossible and definately suicidal. Churchill said that? If so can you give me a source please? It seems something like this kind of operation would've needed to take place before SU got in the war in, plus the Soviets had the man power the Allies needed; they really did 70% of the total Allied work, with many multiple times the casualties.
it was more of a question of keeping the russians out, ofcourse it would have been more dead in the british and american forces, but Churchill knew stalin wouldnt give up the ground, i tried to find some internet sources but cant, sorry, all i remember is from books i read years ago/tv programs i watched.
Though i dont remember the original plan name, i remember a sorta quote of"you attack a crocodile from the belly, away from the mouth/scales".
And i know how much the russians did, but what i am saying is that churchill knew what was going to happen and tried to stop it, it was the arrogance of the US government thinking they could control stalin that fucked up eastern europe for decades.
It was 8 months standing alone against an airforce that outnumbered ours something like 50-1 at a time when the said opposing airforce had the factories and resources of the whole of europe at its disposal. It was the country that forced us to pay for whole terrortories and bases in exchange for old warships. It was the country who only joined the war when the battle for britain had be won and had not faced a pearl harbour on both coasts simulatiously. That was what ended the british empire
How can u say declaring war on germany was unnesersary thaty were planing to invade britain and europe and slaughter any one who got in the way on the other hand we were fighting a war for 3 years before the americans joined they were prepared to let us die and rot but as soon as japan attacked them they decide to enter the war and claim thay on it sure they helped but the british had to stop invasion on britain america were quite happy to sit and watch europe die.
The british didn't cause the holocaust, Hitler would have done that anyway. wwii was completely necessary, wwi was the uneccessary one. if we hadn't have joined wwii then Russia would have pwned Europe and taken all the way up to France. Read "what if"
I haven't read the book. But I do think the allies of WWI did contribute to the outbreak of WWII. Look at the Treaty of Versailles. They crippled Germany, both financially and morally. That poverty and sense of wrong doing only aided the rise of someone like Hitler.
no1 wanted a war except germany after ww1 (which was cuased by hungarian terrorists!) hitler increased his power, he took many countries. the allied forces made an agreement with hitler that he could keep the land he gained as long as that was it, any more war was declared. but no1 was fully prepafred for a war except germany, and the US were the cause of many deaths, and i mean allied forces were killed by u, just like u bombed some GB soldiers in iraq recently, then blamed it on the GB army!
Couldn't defend poland? is this guy a fucking retarded american or what? so we couldn't stop them from taking it over first... TELL ME THIS U OLD AMERICAN CUNT, which small coutry declared war against hitler? oh, wouldn't be britian would it? old piece of shit go die in a fukin old people home.
Britain should never have pledge to defend Poland and should not have declared war on Germany. So no, obviously, UK could not defend Poland and should not have, ever.
Yes, very unnecessary. Britain had no interest in defending Poland. By declaring war, they prompted a French declaration of war, resulting in the german invasion of the Nordic countries, the low countries, France and the battle of Britain.
They should have let the soviets and Germany fight it out until mutual destruction.
apart from what you say is pish mate, Hitler would not have sat idle, he took over several nations before poland, had the tiger in production and had atomic weapons also in design along with having several scientists trying to give ieas such as the stg44, the high alt jet bomber and so on. Should the UK have stayed out, he would likely have crushed the russians to the point he took over the oil reserves russia had thus eliminating the russiand powering his own and a nuke, hmmm.
boooooooooo to this arsehole hes talking complete shit. hes a complete wanker. true our empire went down in flames but this guy seems to have the wrong idea.
Well this guy knows about as much pre world war 2 history as a brain dead swan.Can't you ever just blame yourselves for whats happened to you instead of blaming other countries wen it was neville chamberlian the pri minister of britain that let ww2 happen,not britain as a whole,and if giving up our empire for trying to fight for the freedom of the people of europe then so be it,but wer wer u,oh yeah thats it,sittin at home watchin until they declared war on u,then suddenly u wer all up for it
What an idiot. Hitler clearly said in Mein Kampf his plan was to invade Eastern Europe. Either he would have conquered it and wiped out millions, more than he as specifically planned in Mein Kampf or the soviets would have won and we would have been run by commies. We fucking gave up our empire because we elected the labour party who wanted India to be free. India was given itl;s freedom. You ignorant pratt.
He said in Mein Kampf he wanted to exterminate the jews. So? doesnt mean he could have. i think the brits could have done better if they left the work to the russians.
And the brits left india because of mass protests and civil disobediance. Not to mention the japanesse indian nation al army lead by subash chandra bose. The britishers couldint handle it after ww2 because indians refused to work for them.
Anti-British? Absurd. His book is about the follies of the British statesmanship of Churchill. It is not more of an attack, then to say that because you disagree with the policies of George W. Bush you're anti-American.
I said that because of a statement he used on another video aswell as this one.
I can understand things could have went different if we hadn't made Germany pay for WW2 along with whatever sactions we had. But the same goes for the American-Japanese war, that could have been prevented if America hadn't cut off trade with Japan.
Agreed. Like Pres. Hoover said, "We can only stick pin-cushions into rattle-snakes for so long." Yes, America helped to antagonize the Japanese. However, none of that negates the follies committed by the British in its war-guarantee to a Polish junta.
There are a fair amount of refutals online of his selective memory for history as written in his book, and even the Washington Times cites him as an Anglophobe as I previously stated.
w w w . washingtontimes . com/news/2008/jun/10/letter-anglophobe/
Britain pretty much founded the USA I am british before any one thinks im a stupid american. about 99.99% of the american populus think that america lead the world in every thing. Think again. Britain led the world in everything until just recently and the USSR were on even terms Eg first to space. so America stop thinking your all that and come to terms with the weak nation that you really are thinking you are the greatest, Gokalon
The GDP of the entire EU in 2007 was barely larger than that of the US. If you by led the world you mean led a huge empire then sure, you led the world. But you certainly didn't lead the world. I know some very smart British people, and I know some utterly retarded British people. You get off your high horse, and realize that what's happening now in America has happened many times in your own history. When did the Russians hit the moon? Oh they're just getting around to it now? BS analogy
There is a difference, but explain to me how not being one of the first two countries in space is leading the world. I'm so fucking tired of brits explaining to me how stupid Americans are. The way the view history is flawed with historical amnesia, just like us. He also finished by explaining that we need to realize that we're a weak nation. LOL We aren't exactly doing anything to benefit ourselves nor the free world at the moment.
But the fact remains that we are the sole superpower in the world. How long that will last is up to nobody but ourselves. Admittedly with the route and pace we're going it won't last long, but by god it's true today. The only way Europe stood a chance was to throw all their national sovereignty out the window. China will do very well in the next 20 years.
Alas there is agreement and peace. I couldn't be any sorrier than I am for our foreign policy over the last 50 years. I couldn't be any sorrier for most of our media. I tend to think thats a function of running our own empire. Don't worry, it won't last, yours didn't either.
Its not your fault that they lie. In the words on Bush "a fooled man will never get fooled again", lol.
"Don't worry, it won't last, yours didn't either."
It lasted a pretty decent amount of time when you look at it, and I doubt yours is going to crumble anytime soon if McCain gets in or if Obama fails to negotiate.
"I'm so fucking tired of brits explaining to me how stupid americans are"
lol, it isn't just Britons, I've seen people from every country say it. Blame Greenday & Miss Teen America & Bush for some of his comments & whoever the mystery man from the past was who started that stereotype :P
Fair enough, it's not just Britons. A large part of that is due to how large and pervasive throughout the world our media is. The crap they shove down our throats is also shoved down the throats of the rest of the world. Do you think that beauty queens from the rest of the world are smart? GWB is very smart and one of the most effective politicians in a long time. He's just an asshole who's policies are stupid and flawed.
"Do you think that beauty queens from the rest of the world are smart?"
Don't know.
I don't doubt that he must have a decent amount of intelligence, but he has said a lot of stupid crap since he got into his presidency and I agree, him and his buds are assholes for fabricating lies for war.
Said stupid things...agreed. Utterly smashed his competition with his ability to get exactly what he wanted? I think the answer is also yes. However his policies were essentially a continuation of Bill Clinton's.
They fabricated lies for Iraq, I do believe we were justified in Afghanistan though. Maybe we aren't justified in staying there either. We certainly can't afford it.
i know sure smart brits and u aint one. britain was the first in industrial revolution but not in everything and the soviets and america were never on the same block. did u know 700 years b4 the advent of industrial revolution china had the same amount of heavy industry as britain had right b4 industrial revolution.
According to the "conspiracy theories" the Rothschilds have had a lot of power ever since the begining, so if it is true, then they were also the making and the breaking of this country. Besides, I've seen on one of your previous account the "Hitler the Great" video. He also reportedly had good Jewish friends and supporters, hmmmm.
Pat Buchanan, isn't he a favourite of Fox News? =) And talking of failure of British diplomacy, what about American diplomacy with Japan? He's probably grieving his families loss and just wants some1 to blame, oh well.
I'd make a bet that you aren't as versed in ww2 knowledge as you'd think, and neither am i. If anything was different back then, results could have been mightely different, if we had allied with Germany, we would have owned Europe no doubt, but would likely have been taking the risk of getting nuked by the USSR as a last resort. Things went the way they did, and things are the way they are.
If he thinks Bush should do things different, fine, but don't go blaming other countries and people for shit that your dumbass president has got himself into.
what r u a 2 year old fucking kid. He's relating how a great power went down and how it relates to us.god u r stupid, no to mention getting worked up over if he blames other countires, why not stand up for ur own country.
to the delusioal 10 yer old moron, first he's talking about not beiing invilved in european wars so no alliance with germany. 2nd we were the first with nukes. made in 1944 i beleive, while the leadup to ww2 has been since the 20's and the actual war started in 1939. 3rd the ruskies got nukes from US, 4th and ww2 and lend lease cooperation made it possible for russia to infiltrate more in america and hence grab nukes.
great, when u don't know shit attack the person. pat is also against provoking japan. and america didn't get involved in ww2 till hitler declared war on germany. when japan bombed us it was still a war different from the one in europe.
Who was the one who attacked me 1st? You called me a 10 yr old delusional kid, is that not an attack? I know the Japanese war was a different war to the one if Europe, where did you get the idea that I thought anything else? I just checked and yes, you are right, Russia didn't get nukes until after the war, my bad, SORRY!
Just for a little extra info, I have just read up and you didn't sell them the nukes, the documents on how they are made were released and the Soviets made them themselves.
"hitler declared war on usa." no nukes were sold, SOVIETS STOLE THEM. the soviets had at least 5 spies working in los alamos, which was the TOPMOST SECRET US project during ww2. and i'm excluding all other soviet intrusion....like algier hess, assistant to president roosevelt, was a soviet agent. google search george koval, he did the most damage at los alamos. Plus i'd like to see ur sources where u got ur information from , cuz they are erroneous.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The 'Brits' said they would defend poland because they didnt want an evil dictator ruling every1 but if we hadnt you would probably be dead. so. Your welcome
two world wars sunk britain, it went bankrupt. thats why we hate germans. we go bankrupt and they go and loose anyway.
british123able 5 months ago
@british123able
Yeah we only paid of the bill to the US in 2006! And the damn Germans are minted now thanks to US investment in their cars industries.
srspower 5 months ago
@srspower the country has money but they are not allowed a proper army anymore, and its the same with japan. they are only allowed to have a defence force. if they have proper army like the uk or france then they would not be as rich. uk could go to war with japan and germany at the same time and win. america backs them up militarly.
british123able 5 months ago
@british123able
Nah mate thats not accurate with Japan. Japan has a vast army in fact its the second most advanced army in the world. It may be called a defence force, but it is larger and better equiped than the UK's. Honestly, go look it up.
srspower 5 months ago
@srspower im in the uk armed forces, im a lance corporal in the royal marines commando. my name is gareth im 25 years old. i have traveled all over the world and have a basic knowledge of the worlds powers and im telling you that japan is not allowed a proper army. we would destroy japan. they dont even have nuclear weapons my friend. neither does germany. i would put a euro fighter against 5 mitsubishis anyday of the week. even on a sunday fella
british123able 5 months ago
@nurizeko you idiot. the zionist bankers robbed England and every other country, and now robbing america. Britain didn't give up anything willingly. Such backward notions of robbing the world through fake fiat currency they still cling to though huh? You live in fantasy land
sssssjjjj1 6 months ago
i think this man just doesn't like the British.
677222 6 months ago
Comment removed
677222 6 months ago
Kudos to the Today show, and Lester for letting Buchanan state his case, even if very briefly.
Ponerology 8 months ago
clearly he does not understand history and his book does not take a balanced view upon all the facts
kkrules13 9 months ago
@kkrules13
What facts does he not understand? The communists gained territory in WWII, only because of US and British help. Britain then lost its empire. Do you deny those facts?
Ponerology 8 months ago
ww2 happand thats why we were dependant its pretty obvius
glicher100 11 months ago
An american writing about history in Europe that happened 100 years ago? Please, i hate americans like the guy in this vid
NGC773 11 months ago
Comment removed
NGC773 11 months ago
Whatever is caused by a Brit is solved by a Brit =)
007Influence 1 year ago
How the hell in Gods name did Great Britain cause the World Wars? The Nazi's were planning this war way before the British Empire even influenced Europe, they found some new land and based an empire off of Australia and Canada. In fact the gave up their Empire to save the world from German annihilation! It sickens me how people like this old bag can defend Hitler after all he has done! Rot in hell Pat Buchanan!! I'm proud to be British, the saviors of the world! R.I.P Grandad!
007Influence 1 year ago
@007Influence DOn't be stupid we never sacrificed the Empire to save the world. We mortgaged the empire on a war to save British independence and to stop a hedgemonic power being created on the continent that would overrun the Empire. We never thought that a) we would have to use as many resources and men as was required, b) that our island would actually be at real risk of being conquered and c) that the yanks would screw us in the peace and call in our debts without a softener.
AresRoar 1 year ago
@AresRoar I know it wasn't out intention but the Empire did save the world. We were the 2nd strongest country behind Germany as 1st. We were the 1 country they didn't want to fight!
007Influence 1 year ago
@007Influence No it didn't, and you weren't number 2. Both the US and Germany had bigger economies than Britain's. The Japanese smashed the empire in the East and Germany left Britain defending our island. The US provided the material needed to win the war from day one to Chiang Kai-shek's China, Stalin's Russia and Britain. Russia was responsible for the most German war dead and the US was responsible for the overwhelming fire power and resources.
And saved from what? British imperialism?
AresRoar 1 year ago
@AresRoar British Imperialism was the best thing that ever happened to the world, India and The African countries they annexed said they wished they had never become independent from the U.K, mainly because of all of their financial problems right now and their economy status. If you paid attention in history you would know that America wouldn't be rich without British colonization, by introducing the Industrial age to you! Also Britain was 2nd because they were at the height of their Empire. =/
007Influence 1 year ago
@00Before you Brits India had consistently either the 1st or 2nd highest GDP in the world, today it is a 3rd world toilet that may go nuclear with Pakistan which you Brits created, not to mention the mass starvations in Bengal under Brit rule. Africa was cut to pieces with disregard for ethnic borders leading to bloody wars through to today, a white brit settler community abusing the native black population & again economic rape as in India.In the US brits gave slavery and the native holocaust.
AresRoar 1 year ago
@007Influence Britain was number 3, your Empire didn't mean shit because both Germany and the US could produce goods more efficiently and under cut your goods in your own colonies. That's why you went protectionist. And also why Germany kicked your ass so badly. If they had fought you one on one you guys would be speaking German. It was only through American material support which began before the war that you barely survived. You Brit loser.
AresRoar 1 year ago
@AresRoar America was 2nd then? That's a laugh because you struggled in a fight against Japan so you had to play dirty and turn it into a thermonuclear war! So Japan surrendered because you were playing a game they didn't want to get involved in! The last thing Germany did was slam us, they planned to invade but couldn't even get past our air force! If you looked it up you might of known that! American support? If it wasn't for Britain you would be speaking German so don't say you saved the day!
007Influence 1 year ago
@007Influence How did we struggle against Japan. They attacked us in December 1941, after midway in July 1942 the Japs were on island hopping back to the main land and on the run, unlike you Brit pussies who surrendered Singapore to them. And we nuked them because unlike you we don't waste our own lives when we can blast the enemy to hell.
Germany would have conquered you if we didn't provide you with material support. Who do you think was supplying the money, planes and arms? the usa was idiot
AresRoar 1 year ago
@AresRoar And Germany would have conquered you if Britain didn't stop them from conquering Europe! Without one of these countries Russia, America and Britain, Germany would have conquered the world! Yes I'm not disagreeing that you saved us by providing resources and fighting Japan, but you have to respect the fact that without Britain, Germany would have conquered Europe and then would have attacked America like they planned with enough forces by then to kill you 2x over! So don't hog the cred!
007Influence 1 year ago
@007Influence Hitler couldn't even beat Russia or invade Britain. Both powers were supplied by the USA. He wouldn't have stood a chance against the US. One he'd have to cross the Atlantic, secondly we were technologically more advanced and got the atom bomb first.
The US went into both theatres of was and smashed the opposition, coming out of the war as the most powerful nation on Earth. And lets not forget how well armed the US population is and how we've never been conquered.
AresRoar 1 year ago
@AresRoar You NEVER supplied Russia!? I don't know if your getting these retarded facts from Wikipedia but you only supplied Britain at the end of the war and that's it! The U.K stood alone against Germany and it's allies until the Nazi's invaded Russia which made them join and then Japan blew up Pearl Harbor which made you join. America has only been around for a few hundred years so that's why you haven't been conquered..yet! You only just came out as the most powerful nation from the cold war
007Influence 1 year ago
@007Influence Ok I'm not going to argue with a retard who doesn't know anything about history or looking up facts. Now little boy I want you to look up the "lend-lease program" and it's deliveries to Russia. You'll find that I am correct and you are as ever wrong.
Wrong again, the US came out of the war as the most powerful and economically advanced nation on Earth. Russia was a distant second, they had to make up for it by stealing our nuclear tech through spying. Yeah so young yet so great.
AresRoar 1 year ago
@AresRoar Yeah but Russia was never supplied by you. Russia transferred them to linked countries who were in the war because they couldn't get or afford supplies directly from America. I don't know who you think you are calling me a little boy because I have studied this at an A grade level and have a pass distinction on it! You and Russia stole technology from each other, and you struggled against them toe-to-toe, except your 'country' obviously wouldn't tell you that.
007Influence 1 year ago
@AresRoar Dude, let's be fair. Germany had the best equiped and trained military in the world when the US joined WW2. If Hitler hadn't been such a control freak, he would have fucked us over and if Japan hadn't attacked you, Hitler would have crossed the Atlantic to get to you. You came out of WW2 as a super power but you sure didn't go into it as one. But why argue about it? It happened and that won't ever change.
Jems17 9 months ago
@Jems17 The largest economy on Earth at the time was the USA, the most advanced nation on Earth was the USA- where do you think things like flight, skyscrapers, DC and AC electricity were developed- all in America, then Germany because of racism saw a brain drain to America. The reason we were courted by the Allies was because we were a superpower but we were isolationist, furthermore after WW1 we forced all Europe including the British empire to join the league of nations but we didn't join.
AresRoar 9 months ago
@AresRoar Forced us to join ahahaha don't be stupid you never you suggested it then pulled out and America was not the biggest economy and advanced nation until after WW2 after the profits you made of the war not to mention all the knowledge and technology we Brits gave you as an enticement to send us weapons and food not that we needed it in the end just caused are own downfall i hope china does as you did to us call the debt bang America collapses as you cannot afford it
JamesCunnyy 8 months ago
@AresRoar Britain has invented more things than America, Germany and France combined so your point of America being the most advanced is lunacy during and before WW2 it was only after when you brought all the German scientists and had all the money to experiment as well as the massive population and resources that you took a lead only due to Europe's bad state
JamesCunnyy 8 months ago
@AresRoar also Britain would have made a comeback had the winter of 1946-47 not been so severe slashing £1 equal to $4.03 to $2.80($1.60 today) that with a 10% decline in industrial production that then made the US dollar the top currency without doubt, had that winter not occured you could argue Britain would still have an Empire and be a superpower but then again what does a superpower really mean we have beaten them as nothing more than what we are now
JamesCunnyy 8 months ago
Pat Buchanan is so right though...we honestly should have not put those conditions on Germany. WW2 would have never happened.
yangistan 1 year ago
Appeasement was the main cause of WW2. Not Hitler's territorial ambitions. What a fucking idiot.
guywiththerussianhat 1 year ago
My God! That's the first time I've ever heard defending Poland (or anyone for that matter) against the Nazis as the wrong thing to do! He draws a comparison between Britain's position then and America's now "...everytime we have to stand up we can't appease", if he knew F all about WWII he'd know Britain tried to appease, signed a treaty in fact which Hitler broke. WTF else does he suggest after that?! Got no idea who this no-nothing twat is but I'm willing to bet he's Bill O'Reilly's bum buddy.
MegaBudHead 1 year ago
Ha ha ha. One country caused everything apparently. That's funny. Buchanan does not know much about history. It's absurd that in America people like him even get interviewed properly on television.
person9144 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMERICA IS NUMBER ONE
AND YOU ARE THE FUCKING LOSERS
WE KICKED YOUR ASS IN OUR STRUGGLE
DONT FUCK WITH USA
YOU FUCKING BRITS BETTER KNOW YOUR PLACE
GO FETCH DOG IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN ANY WHERE
GO FETCH MOTHER FUCKER
LEARN TO FIGHT HELMAND PUSSIES!
USA USA USA USA NUMBER ONE
nice0071 1 year ago
Pat's talking about the political leadership of Britain at the time, not the British people
david1965af 1 year ago
WHAT A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS!!!!!!!!!!!
jackow1986 1 year ago
Comment removed
jackow1986 1 year ago
He says alot of things that are true, but also alot of things that are just American blohard bullshit. Cunt
SpitfireUK2 1 year ago
world war 2 is caused by Communism, the SovietUnion, and the ashkenazim jewish marxist mafia. It was not a blunder of Great Britain, it was INTENTIONALLY done the way it was done. Great Britain is a supporter of Communism, just like the Jews in New York who funded Lenin and the massacre of 65 million Christians in the Soviet Union.
salamander162A 1 year ago
Y the FUCK is that bastard blaming us for the holocaust?? It's hardly our fault if hitler had sumthin against Jews.
jordanpieman 1 year ago
Er, i think you will find it was Hitler that caused an unnecessary war, and we sold our empire to fight against him (whilst people like Pat Buchanan sat around with their thumb up their arse and their mind in neutral). Its a good job we did to, as it wouldnt just be Europe and Asia that would be speaking German right now. They were within miles of Moscow whilst fighting on two fronts, imagine if it was just one. This guy is clearly a wanker.
jonpy55 1 year ago
And as for blaming the british for WW2....insanity. Was the US responsible for Japan killing 20 million chinese, because they stopped oil imports to the japanese mainland? Why not blame the french, seeing as their army outnumbered the british 4 to 1?
maureenOWW 1 year ago
The reason britain gave up it's empire was becasue it WASN'T MAKING ANY MONEY. It held on to the one piece that was making money (Hong Kong) and let the rest go. The british had had enough of empire (both morally and economically) in 1900, that's why the 1903 invasion of Tibet was massively criticized despite it being a complete military success. Basically, they grew out of it. The empire was in decline long before WW1.
maureenOWW 1 year ago
the united states caused WW2 in two ways, first they caused the financial crisis that plunged germany back into economic deprivation allowing hitler to say "the suffering you are experiencing is the jews fault!", hitler could never had done this without the grinding poverty the 1930's wallstreet crash caused in germany. second, america after WW1 took its policy of 'splendid isolation', abandoning europe when we needed them most. Remember, hitler wanted us as allies, we refused based on morality
tigerfedor 1 year ago
you idiot if hitler was left to his own devises they would have marched relatively unopposed across eastern europe and turn west. hitler asked the british to become allies before we declared war. sometimes you have to make decisions with your heart not your head. i for one believe we made the right decision and could not care less that we are no longer the power we once were
geordieracer222 1 year ago
I think Buchanan's wrong. Britain, in my view, had no choice but to declare war
on Germany after they invaded Poland. Is he saying that Hitler could be trusted? That's a stretch. I believe that Roosevelt wanted to enter the war but was restrained because of political ramifications. The American public were largely against war and isolationist. But Pearl Harbor changed all that. Churchill rejoiced at Pearl Harbor as he knew that the Anglo American alliance would eventually defeat Hitler
creekpanther 1 year ago
@creekpanther Im an Englishman, with hindsight, Pat is right, that war destroyed my country and we are feeling the adverse affects to this day.
u6j65 1 year ago
lol
toweronepower 1 year ago
Pat Buchanan is an ignorant American apologist for totalitarianism.
veritasx77 2 years ago
you not like Jews?
TrilogyofC 2 years ago
TheInternetGangster is an obese American hillbilly who worships Hitler.
veritasx77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
haha what a load of shit
Stephanavich 2 years ago
what the fuck are you talking about???
sinerita 2 years ago
anyone who thinks that the west(UK and USA) could have won germany from 1945 (which is likely when he would turn on britain, as it would give more then enough time to take russia) is a fool and a dumbass, not even the USA could win then.
MitchofSmeg 2 years ago
The USSR taking of europe could have been stopped if the US leaders were not so stupid to think that Stalin would leave it alone, i mean, look at it, Churchill wanted to do the attack on the balkans for a reason which is well known and the US wouldnt allow it,
As for "empire to an island", much of the empire was now its own lands, and were giving support as they could, shame that india isnt to good for giving iron or steel huh?
MitchofSmeg 2 years ago
britain still has remants of the empire
jedatpompey09 2 years ago
@MitchofSmeg
"Churchill wanted to do the attack on the balkans for a reason"--How, why and with what? Fight the USSR and Germany simultaneously or after Germany? Btw, I disagree with Buchanan.
RattlerBK 1 year ago
@RattlerBK
The reason being that should we have launched the major assault from the balans then we would be able to rush north through eastern europe in a pincer against the germans with the russians, but we would also be able to lock the russian forces out of the war, because the americans being americans thought they would be able to convince stalin to give up the europian land he would take in the war, churchill being british didnt trust stalin, 1 turned out to be right and decades of hell.
MitchofSmeg 1 year ago
@MitchofSmeg
Launch an assault in the Balkans? That would've been nice but it sounds like it would've been impossible and definately suicidal. Churchill said that? If so can you give me a source please? It seems something like this kind of operation would've needed to take place before SU got in the war in, plus the Soviets had the man power the Allies needed; they really did 70% of the total Allied work, with many multiple times the casualties.
RattlerBK 1 year ago
@RattlerBK
it was more of a question of keeping the russians out, ofcourse it would have been more dead in the british and american forces, but Churchill knew stalin wouldnt give up the ground, i tried to find some internet sources but cant, sorry, all i remember is from books i read years ago/tv programs i watched.
Though i dont remember the original plan name, i remember a sorta quote of"you attack a crocodile from the belly, away from the mouth/scales".
Also Operation Unthinkable too.
MitchofSmeg 1 year ago
@RattlerBK
And i know how much the russians did, but what i am saying is that churchill knew what was going to happen and tried to stop it, it was the arrogance of the US government thinking they could control stalin that fucked up eastern europe for decades.
MitchofSmeg 1 year ago
It was 8 months standing alone against an airforce that outnumbered ours something like 50-1 at a time when the said opposing airforce had the factories and resources of the whole of europe at its disposal. It was the country that forced us to pay for whole terrortories and bases in exchange for old warships. It was the country who only joined the war when the battle for britain had be won and had not faced a pearl harbour on both coasts simulatiously. That was what ended the british empire
rulebrittaniaPTBB 2 years ago
Pat speaks truth!
dex216sims 2 years ago
no he dosnt its just you arogant americans blaming everyone els but yourself
downlandsalex 2 years ago
You got me confused with a neocon, buddy. I'm not arrogant at all. There's plenty of blame to go around for WWII
dex216sims 2 years ago
pat, is a dumbass who doesnt understand military imperial or econimic war
MitchofSmeg 2 years ago
How can u say declaring war on germany was unnesersary thaty were planing to invade britain and europe and slaughter any one who got in the way on the other hand we were fighting a war for 3 years before the americans joined they were prepared to let us die and rot but as soon as japan attacked them they decide to enter the war and claim thay on it sure they helped but the british had to stop invasion on britain america were quite happy to sit and watch europe die.
downlandsalex 2 years ago 5
I agree should of let the europeans rot under the germans.. They hate America and great Britain anyway.
steve1mufc 2 years ago
"Oh yeah"
helicoptered 2 years ago
The british didn't cause the holocaust, Hitler would have done that anyway. wwii was completely necessary, wwi was the uneccessary one. if we hadn't have joined wwii then Russia would have pwned Europe and taken all the way up to France. Read "what if"
Wazzilinki 2 years ago
I haven't read the book. But I do think the allies of WWI did contribute to the outbreak of WWII. Look at the Treaty of Versailles. They crippled Germany, both financially and morally. That poverty and sense of wrong doing only aided the rise of someone like Hitler.
dazeoftheweak 3 years ago
Yep that is a fact.
hi262779 3 years ago
The destruction of hitler was unnecessary.
I
Think
Not
chairehead 3 years ago
i say his name is pat duche-of-a-man
thefraggenator 3 years ago
dud u read his book?
tonylee1973 3 years ago
no1 wanted a war except germany after ww1 (which was cuased by hungarian terrorists!) hitler increased his power, he took many countries. the allied forces made an agreement with hitler that he could keep the land he gained as long as that was it, any more war was declared. but no1 was fully prepafred for a war except germany, and the US were the cause of many deaths, and i mean allied forces were killed by u, just like u bombed some GB soldiers in iraq recently, then blamed it on the GB army!
thefraggenator 3 years ago
I love it how someone who has a degree in journalism, feels he is an expert in European history.
monorail1990 3 years ago 2
This, WW1 was caused by rapidly advancing political events and a messy patchworks of alliances that drew all European powers into the conflict.
WW2 was caused by Germany not quite getting over WW1 along with un-neccisarilly crippling post-war conditions set upon it by the victors.
Sorry America, your problems are your own.
P.S. Britain gave up its empire mostly willingly as Europe grew past petty imperialism and such backward notions, how about the US?.
nurizeko 3 years ago 13
Couldn't defend poland? is this guy a fucking retarded american or what? so we couldn't stop them from taking it over first... TELL ME THIS U OLD AMERICAN CUNT, which small coutry declared war against hitler? oh, wouldn't be britian would it? old piece of shit go die in a fukin old people home.
Bungle12345678 3 years ago
Britain should never have pledge to defend Poland and should not have declared war on Germany. So no, obviously, UK could not defend Poland and should not have, ever.
and stop your vile words, please, young man.
Hadgoux 2 years ago
An unnecessary war???? seriously... TWAT
askitso 3 years ago
Yes, very unnecessary. Britain had no interest in defending Poland. By declaring war, they prompted a French declaration of war, resulting in the german invasion of the Nordic countries, the low countries, France and the battle of Britain.
They should have let the soviets and Germany fight it out until mutual destruction.
Hadgoux 2 years ago
@Hadgoux
apart from what you say is pish mate, Hitler would not have sat idle, he took over several nations before poland, had the tiger in production and had atomic weapons also in design along with having several scientists trying to give ieas such as the stg44, the high alt jet bomber and so on. Should the UK have stayed out, he would likely have crushed the russians to the point he took over the oil reserves russia had thus eliminating the russiand powering his own and a nuke, hmmm.
MitchofSmeg 1 year ago
boooooooooo to this arsehole hes talking complete shit. hes a complete wanker. true our empire went down in flames but this guy seems to have the wrong idea.
WellImHereNow 3 years ago
thats a well thought out answer based on facts.
tonylee1973 3 years ago
Well this guy knows about as much pre world war 2 history as a brain dead swan.Can't you ever just blame yourselves for whats happened to you instead of blaming other countries wen it was neville chamberlian the pri minister of britain that let ww2 happen,not britain as a whole,and if giving up our empire for trying to fight for the freedom of the people of europe then so be it,but wer wer u,oh yeah thats it,sittin at home watchin until they declared war on u,then suddenly u wer all up for it
jameshaz35 3 years ago
IT was not chamberlain who was responsible, it was Churchill who was a warmonger.
I don't think the US should have entered the war at all.
Hadgoux 2 years ago
yank talking shit again shouldnt he be in a old peoples home talking to his cock
cymrucymreig 3 years ago
Hahahahaha What a Comment
RyanPr2 2 years ago
the interviewer sounds exactly like keith olbermann!!
jimmyfellatio 3 years ago
lol your all wrong
whiteninja001 3 years ago
Aww, he wants to be Queen.
kaferere 3 years ago
"Dedicated to my four uncles, three of whom are dead, one of whom are alive."
MicahTheZombie 3 years ago 2
Listen again. He clearly says "is alive", after a pause, no less.
josephjstern 3 years ago
What an idiot. Hitler clearly said in Mein Kampf his plan was to invade Eastern Europe. Either he would have conquered it and wiped out millions, more than he as specifically planned in Mein Kampf or the soviets would have won and we would have been run by commies. We fucking gave up our empire because we elected the labour party who wanted India to be free. India was given itl;s freedom. You ignorant pratt.
zzxzqwq 3 years ago
He said in Mein Kampf he wanted to exterminate the jews. So? doesnt mean he could have. i think the brits could have done better if they left the work to the russians.
And the brits left india because of mass protests and civil disobediance. Not to mention the japanesse indian nation al army lead by subash chandra bose. The britishers couldint handle it after ww2 because indians refused to work for them.
grotesquenn 3 years ago
He did try and exterminate the jews though.
zzxzqwq 3 years ago
Anti-British? Absurd. His book is about the follies of the British statesmanship of Churchill. It is not more of an attack, then to say that because you disagree with the policies of George W. Bush you're anti-American.
peddler66 3 years ago 2
I said that because of a statement he used on another video aswell as this one.
I can understand things could have went different if we hadn't made Germany pay for WW2 along with whatever sactions we had. But the same goes for the American-Japanese war, that could have been prevented if America hadn't cut off trade with Japan.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
***WW2 should say WW1***
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Agreed. Like Pres. Hoover said, "We can only stick pin-cushions into rattle-snakes for so long." Yes, America helped to antagonize the Japanese. However, none of that negates the follies committed by the British in its war-guarantee to a Polish junta.
peddler66 3 years ago
There are a fair amount of refutals online of his selective memory for history as written in his book, and even the Washington Times cites him as an Anglophobe as I previously stated.
w w w . washingtontimes . com/news/2008/jun/10/letter-anglophobe/
w w w . yourish . com /2008/06/20/4989
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Buchanan is a admirer of the British empire, not an Anglophobe.
Hadgoux 2 years ago
Just for the record, Pat Buchanan comes across as anti-Briton, I've listened to some other stuff he said just a min ago.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
"Great Britain isn't worth an old shoe" Comical Ali. And yes i also Fucking live there.
blujufirst 3 years ago
Britain pretty much founded the USA I am british before any one thinks im a stupid american. about 99.99% of the american populus think that america lead the world in every thing. Think again. Britain led the world in everything until just recently and the USSR were on even terms Eg first to space. so America stop thinking your all that and come to terms with the weak nation that you really are thinking you are the greatest, Gokalon
Gokalon 3 years ago
The GDP of the entire EU in 2007 was barely larger than that of the US. If you by led the world you mean led a huge empire then sure, you led the world. But you certainly didn't lead the world. I know some very smart British people, and I know some utterly retarded British people. You get off your high horse, and realize that what's happening now in America has happened many times in your own history. When did the Russians hit the moon? Oh they're just getting around to it now? BS analogy
bighitter42 3 years ago
He said first into space, not first on the moon, note the difference.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
There is a difference, but explain to me how not being one of the first two countries in space is leading the world. I'm so fucking tired of brits explaining to me how stupid Americans are. The way the view history is flawed with historical amnesia, just like us. He also finished by explaining that we need to realize that we're a weak nation. LOL We aren't exactly doing anything to benefit ourselves nor the free world at the moment.
bighitter42 3 years ago
But the fact remains that we are the sole superpower in the world. How long that will last is up to nobody but ourselves. Admittedly with the route and pace we're going it won't last long, but by god it's true today. The only way Europe stood a chance was to throw all their national sovereignty out the window. China will do very well in the next 20 years.
bighitter42 3 years ago
"China will do very well in the next 20 years."
True by what I've heard
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Alas there is agreement and peace. I couldn't be any sorrier than I am for our foreign policy over the last 50 years. I couldn't be any sorrier for most of our media. I tend to think thats a function of running our own empire. Don't worry, it won't last, yours didn't either.
bighitter42 3 years ago
"I couldn't be any sorrier for most of our media"
Its not your fault that they lie. In the words on Bush "a fooled man will never get fooled again", lol.
"Don't worry, it won't last, yours didn't either."
It lasted a pretty decent amount of time when you look at it, and I doubt yours is going to crumble anytime soon if McCain gets in or if Obama fails to negotiate.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
"I'm so fucking tired of brits explaining to me how stupid americans are"
lol, it isn't just Britons, I've seen people from every country say it. Blame Greenday & Miss Teen America & Bush for some of his comments & whoever the mystery man from the past was who started that stereotype :P
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Fair enough, it's not just Britons. A large part of that is due to how large and pervasive throughout the world our media is. The crap they shove down our throats is also shoved down the throats of the rest of the world. Do you think that beauty queens from the rest of the world are smart? GWB is very smart and one of the most effective politicians in a long time. He's just an asshole who's policies are stupid and flawed.
bighitter42 3 years ago
"Do you think that beauty queens from the rest of the world are smart?"
Don't know.
I don't doubt that he must have a decent amount of intelligence, but he has said a lot of stupid crap since he got into his presidency and I agree, him and his buds are assholes for fabricating lies for war.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Said stupid things...agreed. Utterly smashed his competition with his ability to get exactly what he wanted? I think the answer is also yes. However his policies were essentially a continuation of Bill Clinton's.
They fabricated lies for Iraq, I do believe we were justified in Afghanistan though. Maybe we aren't justified in staying there either. We certainly can't afford it.
bighitter42 3 years ago
i know sure smart brits and u aint one. britain was the first in industrial revolution but not in everything and the soviets and america were never on the same block. did u know 700 years b4 the advent of industrial revolution china had the same amount of heavy industry as britain had right b4 industrial revolution.
sarjil 3 years ago
Sounds like another good book.
WyattKaldenberg 3 years ago
I'm really starting to like this guy.
Liberaliter 3 years ago
.....
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Would you care to slander Germany?
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Explain?
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
According to the "conspiracy theories" the Rothschilds have had a lot of power ever since the begining, so if it is true, then they were also the making and the breaking of this country. Besides, I've seen on one of your previous account the "Hitler the Great" video. He also reportedly had good Jewish friends and supporters, hmmmm.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Pat Buchanan, isn't he a favourite of Fox News? =) And talking of failure of British diplomacy, what about American diplomacy with Japan? He's probably grieving his families loss and just wants some1 to blame, oh well.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
No, actually he's on MSNBC and he's dead right.
abudi20 3 years ago
I'd make a bet that you aren't as versed in ww2 knowledge as you'd think, and neither am i. If anything was different back then, results could have been mightely different, if we had allied with Germany, we would have owned Europe no doubt, but would likely have been taking the risk of getting nuked by the USSR as a last resort. Things went the way they did, and things are the way they are.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
If he thinks Bush should do things different, fine, but don't go blaming other countries and people for shit that your dumbass president has got himself into.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
what r u a 2 year old fucking kid. He's relating how a great power went down and how it relates to us.god u r stupid, no to mention getting worked up over if he blames other countires, why not stand up for ur own country.
sarjil 3 years ago
to the delusioal 10 yer old moron, first he's talking about not beiing invilved in european wars so no alliance with germany. 2nd we were the first with nukes. made in 1944 i beleive, while the leadup to ww2 has been since the 20's and the actual war started in 1939. 3rd the ruskies got nukes from US, 4th and ww2 and lend lease cooperation made it possible for russia to infiltrate more in america and hence grab nukes.
sarjil 3 years ago
The person who's video this is has been deleting other peoples comments of whom I was replying to, so fuck off.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
great, when u don't know shit attack the person. pat is also against provoking japan. and america didn't get involved in ww2 till hitler declared war on germany. when japan bombed us it was still a war different from the one in europe.
sarjil 3 years ago
Who was the one who attacked me 1st? You called me a 10 yr old delusional kid, is that not an attack? I know the Japanese war was a different war to the one if Europe, where did you get the idea that I thought anything else? I just checked and yes, you are right, Russia didn't get nukes until after the war, my bad, SORRY!
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
"till hitler declared war on germany"
Hilter didn't declare war on Germany, lol.
Just for a little extra info, I have just read up and you didn't sell them the nukes, the documents on how they are made were released and the Soviets made them themselves.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
"hitler declared war on usa." no nukes were sold, SOVIETS STOLE THEM. the soviets had at least 5 spies working in los alamos, which was the TOPMOST SECRET US project during ww2. and i'm excluding all other soviet intrusion....like algier hess, assistant to president roosevelt, was a soviet agent. google search george koval, he did the most damage at los alamos. Plus i'd like to see ur sources where u got ur information from , cuz they are erroneous.
sarjil 3 years ago
Well you've changed your story twice now, so I can't be bothered with this
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
lol pat Buchanan always puts his footnotes at the end of his books if you are really that skeptical.
x3onr3g1z 3 years ago
Rassisten the racist anti-Brit, go fuck yourself.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
The term racist is overused, still you're still a arrogant shit.
WizzoSchizo 3 years ago
Hello Irag 'War'.....
RazielCuts 3 years ago
True...
Dutchdrummer99 3 years ago
and alamannic, the popularity of America world wide, which has dropped so much is due to British politics, believe me it is.
CilicianAri 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The 'Brits' said they would defend poland because they didnt want an evil dictator ruling every1 but if we hadnt you would probably be dead. so. Your welcome
JackMack1995 3 years ago
The US is screwed... the dollar is falling...
Dutchdrummer99 3 years ago