When was this made? The crash at 1:14 looks almost not that bad when compared to one that happened in Germany about 10 or 15 years ago. The cars ended up stacked together like in their CGI simulation.
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
This is god damn scary. The whole point of lateral buckling is it transfers impact energy lateraly, instead of stoping dead into a wall (which is what kills you). If you remove the lateral, the victims now have to absorb the whole energy instead because it cant find a lateral outlet. Who the hell cares if it protects the train, it's the passengers that people should worry about.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
but why dont the lazy feckers us crash zone thingys. like the new tecnology to make buildings sway during an earthquake. reduced the no of peeps killed.
First of all, springs would NOT absorb the shock--they would bounce back out again, which would actually make the situation worse. Secondly, the crush zones in the end do exactly what you describe--absorb the shock.
excelent system, but why dont used now, modificate now all models around the world!!, why we need to die!!. Yeah I know, the insurance pay for us.. but...
It would be better if they kept the jack-knifing, and put crash zones on the sides of the carriages. If they're impractical, i.e. too big, put massive stretchy airbags on the sides which deploy when the train crashes...converting the energy into heat. Then you still get the energy loss from the trains skidding along the ground, and a not-so-sudden impact to the passengers. Why don't they use this idea already? Or do they? Is this a money making idea?!
Airbags are good to ensure that the passengers do not get tossed about & hit the insides of the train. However, the sides of the carriages cave in crushing the passengers when a train jackknifes. Airbags will not help in that case. (In a car the hood is crushable, but the passenger compartment is not, so airbags are useful)
You must be watching a different video to me as he doesn't say that in the one I'm watching... He says they carried out the test in 2000. You're going to have a hard time convincing me that 2000 came before 1981, which is when the french (crumple-zone equipped) TGVs were launched...
so Always a good time with me
lovelygirl622 2 months ago
TGV12 = topgear sports train
surredneck66 2 months ago
lool Im here 4u
MrAnggeilbabe67 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ehm I am a sesy latin girl who loves to have fun everywhere
RessieSueannus23 3 months ago
cool I would advise You to sit back, relax and enjoy my company
maryellenswyriek6565 4 months ago
"There's only one way to find out..." CRASH MORE TRAINS!!
JSFER2 7 months ago in playlist Car Crash test videos
I didn't know kilometers were used in America -.-
KartKing4ever 10 months ago
so why 11 years later, do we still not see crush zones on trains?
jaffacake1578 10 months ago
what program is this?
NerfZoo 11 months ago
When was this made? The crash at 1:14 looks almost not that bad when compared to one that happened in Germany about 10 or 15 years ago. The cars ended up stacked together like in their CGI simulation.
Yora21 1 year ago
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
violafinishda 1 year ago
So where is the rest then??? C'mon!
matthewt1501 1 year ago
The small rail equipment I build can withstand a 20mph crash with minimal damage.
deepscan101 1 year ago
As long as everyone in the train is wearing seatbelts, You probably wouldn't even get injured in a train wreck anymore :D
sweetenedicedtea 1 year ago
@sweetenedicedtea Possible: the train cars did not shatter unlike those of paveroad vehicles.
TheLfwjo 1 year ago
wow i actually learned something today! lol
bond1011 1 year ago 2
thats one badass wall
MTxHulk 1 year ago 4
Good work at the angeneeries
Америкосы всё таки думают о безопасности людей и не жалеют на это денег, у нас же локомотивы и вагоны 40 лет не обновлялись, в прочем как и машины :)
wwwMishanyaCom 2 years ago
it would be very fun to work there
Huskek 2 years ago 2
Ka BOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MrGH3Man4 2 years ago
Could somebody please tell me the name of this show and the episode name?
mikey380sx 2 years ago 4
they cut the show off right at what would be the most interesting
cdsida 2 years ago 4
I Didn`t Knwo This!
This Is beatiofull! And Good
krisraps 2 years ago
what show is this
sgtstagusmc 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hate it when they say speeds in kmh, that doesnt give me any idea how fast somthing is
bronzeonion 2 years ago
let me guess... you are american?
brumbola 2 years ago
no Im english
bronzeonion 2 years ago
There's more of a blunt impact with the new design, will they outfit the new ones with seatbelts?
ExoticSpotting 2 years ago
And is this safety technology being put into trains? I wouldn't really know cause I don't use trains as my main mode of travel.
PearlJammer07 2 years ago
Not safety is all.
Halfback1990 2 years ago
This is god damn scary. The whole point of lateral buckling is it transfers impact energy lateraly, instead of stoping dead into a wall (which is what kills you). If you remove the lateral, the victims now have to absorb the whole energy instead because it cant find a lateral outlet. Who the hell cares if it protects the train, it's the passengers that people should worry about.
Very unimpressed.
thedarkallies 2 years ago
Your logic is like saying you'd rather not be wearing a seatbelt in a car crash so you can be thrown clear of the car instead of being trapped inside.
Would you rather be in a derailed train crushed under several other cars weighting many tons each, or in a train that's still on the rails?
gguru1 2 years ago
depend on speeding and long trailer train
bestamerica 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and what car your in
sheeveington 2 years ago
finally they make things more safer. if no one would die, they wouldnt do anything. before titanic no one took the radio seriously on ships.
HolySpringRolls 3 years ago
tua nonna
ruggeroEco 3 years ago
You just said my granmother.
XDared45X 3 years ago
why cant i see the video
funny video lets chat K6
123ezza123 3 years ago
you could of showd the rest of the vid fuking dumm ass
rapzeh2issocool 3 years ago
true ! lol
mklkmr 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shit
megaVotze 3 years ago
let me see this work on the terns lift and right. @@ americans
necromakouls 3 years ago
geil ^^
hahacu 3 years ago
Yay science!
Typet360 3 years ago
What is the name of the original video? I want to watch all of it.
1maxsilk1 3 years ago 10
Crash Science on National Geographic. The episode is called Trains.
kazo 3 years ago 3
i wanna see the bit about the TGV!!!
Boristhe3rd 3 years ago 43
i wanna see more what's the name of this national geographic video
roninotakuknight 3 years ago 2
@Boristhe3rd tgv? yeah... the fastest train ever... but search for: ICE eschede crash
a german ICE at 300kmh with 15 parts crashed at a bridge. after that it was long like ONE part of these 15
lol (ps normally there would be a smiley but thats not funny.. over 100 people died!)
Dominomusicians 7 months ago
They spent how much testing this? Something that a 10 year old could have found out.
salemcripple 3 years ago 7
lol was thinking the same thing.
TofferB 3 years ago
way to improve the horrible future
wintersinia 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
but why dont the lazy feckers us crash zone thingys. like the new tecnology to make buildings sway during an earthquake. reduced the no of peeps killed.
andrea00mc 3 years ago
why dont they use it?
XtReMeToMo 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
boring!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
cooler123999 3 years ago
if it's boring then why did you search for the video.
BDFPA 3 years ago
the only prob it that is now you going 40 to 0 in 1 ec
squidman101 3 years ago
before it was some about 1.3
if you sit inside this train, it does not matter to you how fast you stop, you fly around at any speed
listamin 3 years ago
same with school buses and pretty much any other bus =P
nasa186 3 years ago
DOMMM
wizard1935 3 years ago
what show is this?
1976MUSTANG 3 years ago
cool man..
difaren95 3 years ago
cool\
=I
Flonominal123 3 years ago
nice
Niklas45 3 years ago
technologyyyy
elsotonacho 3 years ago
cool i hope i ride a new one
Weiberts 3 years ago
with their launch of the tgv
emersondavis 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I know... put dicks instead of crash zones.
nokata619 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how about some fucking huge springs in every end so it can absorb the shock?
mnn2k 4 years ago
Uhh, yeah smart arse, that's exactly what they just demonstrated!
Nimsoft 4 years ago 3
First of all, springs would NOT absorb the shock--they would bounce back out again, which would actually make the situation worse. Secondly, the crush zones in the end do exactly what you describe--absorb the shock.
trainiax 4 years ago 4
lol nicely said speedgeek123
Elfmurderer 4 years ago 4
ahaha ahahaha inertia got pwned
speedgeek123 4 years ago 16
What is the title of this National Geography programme? I want to download the full version.
sunnymiu 4 years ago 5
it called "railroad crashes" it's on every now and again!
MaxItOut1543 4 years ago
Thankyou Guy =D
sunnymiu 4 years ago
strong train
tandis97 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
god this is fagish
meanboy35 4 years ago
excelent system, but why dont used now, modificate now all models around the world!!, why we need to die!!. Yeah I know, the insurance pay for us.. but...
elreservista 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
boring
meanboy35 4 years ago
Your boring
FDKII 4 years ago 11
Good one
1976MUSTANG 4 years ago
It would be better if they kept the jack-knifing, and put crash zones on the sides of the carriages. If they're impractical, i.e. too big, put massive stretchy airbags on the sides which deploy when the train crashes...converting the energy into heat. Then you still get the energy loss from the trains skidding along the ground, and a not-so-sudden impact to the passengers. Why don't they use this idea already? Or do they? Is this a money making idea?!
willsd87 4 years ago
Airbags are good to ensure that the passengers do not get tossed about & hit the insides of the train. However, the sides of the carriages cave in crushing the passengers when a train jackknifes. Airbags will not help in that case. (In a car the hood is crushable, but the passenger compartment is not, so airbags are useful)
xmtz 4 years ago
they couldnt with narrow tunnels
boo7297 4 years ago
Hang on, i've just paused it after hearing that it's a "phenomenon"...it's fucking basic physics! Stupid American crash testers!
willsd87 4 years ago
Do you happen to know the name of this program? I may have to see if it is available on DVD or something...
VFB1210 4 years ago
One more reason not to stand in the vestibule between cars.
ibook133 4 years ago 2
Just a question: but if it happens on a bend?!?
NO WAY the cars are staying into the railway.
Virtuoso23 4 years ago
Use more car.
I want to see more than two stripped down cars.
Floridaman98 4 years ago
one flaw they prevent the train from turning!?!?!!?!?!?!
lbj18 4 years ago
brillant
cesko80 4 years ago
that could actually save some lives.
breakoutboi22 4 years ago
wow the americans only figured this out in April 2000?
jivebunnystudios 4 years ago
WOW your stupid.. Euro used this info..
12GSlug 4 years ago
Yes... they were using it in the early 1980s. Thanks for backing my point up dumbass :)
jivebunnystudios 4 years ago
Really is that why he said Brits and American made the new desing in 2000?
God I hate euro trash..
12GSlug 4 years ago
You must be watching a different video to me as he doesn't say that in the one I'm watching... He says they carried out the test in 2000. You're going to have a hard time convincing me that 2000 came before 1981, which is when the french (crumple-zone equipped) TGVs were launched...
jivebunnystudios 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW and other wow...
Go pick your butt.... No one cares about trains any ways..
12GSlug 4 years ago
why'd you watch it then?
InfluxUK 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I want to see them crash..
12GSlug 4 years ago
WOW "you're" stupid.
willsd87 4 years ago
neat
maxitrain989 4 years ago