5stars! People must see this, but so many will lose interest when faced with words they don't understand. Agreed if it's not Rebecca Black it doesn't get views it seems :(
So sad that this only has 3,731 views when stupid stuff like "Friday" has millions... We need more smart people! Thanks for the amazing information!! <3
Myth-busters recently "debunked" Tesla's 'oscillator device' (the one purported to almost take down a half-built sky scraper in NYC in the 1900's). Now that we know how to calculate the vibrational speed of a given atom, wouldn't Tesla's device be quite feasible to build? All we would need to do is create an artificial vibrational force slight out of sync on both the high point and low point of the atom's natural vibration wave: a slightly out of step impedance match, timed correctly = crash!?
Another top notch installment of the best series on youtube. Kudos for making the maths fun, normally if someone shows me an equation it gives me the urge to tear the monitor off the laptop and hurl it through my closed window. And ultra-mega-respect for the Dave Elsewhere. That chap can strobe!!
@seattle4truth: When I see the picture at 02:39 I get this strange feeling..
Because those in and out motions look EXACTLY like the wrong 2-D wave Nassim Haramein was talkin about.
Maybe the electron also does a 3-D Vortex around its path.. just like the planets do around the sun. But in the atom the sun would be the circles in the picture, circling also as a 3-D vortex around something bigger: the nucleus.
I have no idea what I'm talkin about, but what do you think? :)
@eneaenea9 The electron's orbit the nucleus in a 3D spiral or vortex pattern due to the mechanical vibration of the nucleus and the electromagnetic right hand twist of the electrostatic field oscillations. If the electron did not oscillate in a 3D fashion the matter wave functions and the frequency of the electron would not be able to collapse at the proper impedance match. I think he will cover this in the next video. Euclidean geometry does not truly exist in nature in a 2 dimensional form.
Also, I was going to mention this to them and see what they think... but, and I am sure I am not along in this feeling, I felt that they would just laugh and dismiss it... it is like going to talk to anyone about conspiracy theories... they just stair at you with a glare of pity in their eyes... For some reason I feel like michio kaku would listen.
This one felt like a good ending to the series, especially due to the "call to arms" to the audience to help develop the theory... I was in Fourier class a few days ago and some physics majors were talking about maxwells equations and apparently that is some very very difficult stuff... so I am worried about digging into the math and finding that I have to learn EM-theory :*( ....
@ChaeoS117 Ending??? We are far from done mon frere. :D
And BTW... if you want to mention it to them... Come to them straight with the math. And say that you can show how planck's constant is irrelevant. That is what will impress them, if anything.
Well, I think that this area of energetic disconnect might be caused by a property of space time it self..I've been working on an Idea that can define the properties of spatial permeability that might be able to explain this. :)
I can make a computer simulation of this theory if you want. I did my thesis on computational physics.
webfulfill 3 months ago
5stars! People must see this, but so many will lose interest when faced with words they don't understand. Agreed if it's not Rebecca Black it doesn't get views it seems :(
Boss narration imo
moolie666 5 months ago
So sad that this only has 3,731 views when stupid stuff like "Friday" has millions... We need more smart people! Thanks for the amazing information!! <3
natalie90koerner 11 months ago
there must be a repelling force between proton and electron, but how and what? it can be only released/charged in steps, puzzling..
gmankl 11 months ago
4:09 what does that have to do with what your talking about?
TENNSUMITSUMA 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We hit it off so well after another visit busizz4me.info
sasinihsani 1 year ago
Why is the gravitomagnetic fields of both electrons and protons amplified when the rate of change in energy between them becomes zero?
p75213 1 year ago
Hey nice video I like it, I think, good job!
xIndca 1 year ago
Myth-busters recently "debunked" Tesla's 'oscillator device' (the one purported to almost take down a half-built sky scraper in NYC in the 1900's). Now that we know how to calculate the vibrational speed of a given atom, wouldn't Tesla's device be quite feasible to build? All we would need to do is create an artificial vibrational force slight out of sync on both the high point and low point of the atom's natural vibration wave: a slightly out of step impedance match, timed correctly = crash!?
Hamking1 1 year ago
I understand the impedence matching better now.
krevency 1 year ago
This is good stuff.
hamil4444 1 year ago
I hate to be one of those guys, but @ 7:55 it should be "you're" and not "your".
I just want you to get this perfect too!!
Daemo4 1 year ago
Another top notch installment of the best series on youtube. Kudos for making the maths fun, normally if someone shows me an equation it gives me the urge to tear the monitor off the laptop and hurl it through my closed window. And ultra-mega-respect for the Dave Elsewhere. That chap can strobe!!
educution 1 year ago
Fuck me thats just too exciting.....
Would absolutely love to see you and A.S. come up and present a theory on this!!
Excellent work and videos once again :-)
bardistass 1 year ago
@seattle4truth: When I see the picture at 02:39 I get this strange feeling..
Because those in and out motions look EXACTLY like the wrong 2-D wave Nassim Haramein was talkin about.
Maybe the electron also does a 3-D Vortex around its path.. just like the planets do around the sun. But in the atom the sun would be the circles in the picture, circling also as a 3-D vortex around something bigger: the nucleus.
I have no idea what I'm talkin about, but what do you think? :)
eneaenea9 1 year ago
youtube /watch?v=zBlAGGzup48
eneaenea9 1 year ago
@eneaenea9 The electron's orbit the nucleus in a 3D spiral or vortex pattern due to the mechanical vibration of the nucleus and the electromagnetic right hand twist of the electrostatic field oscillations. If the electron did not oscillate in a 3D fashion the matter wave functions and the frequency of the electron would not be able to collapse at the proper impedance match. I think he will cover this in the next video. Euclidean geometry does not truly exist in nature in a 2 dimensional form.
ImJacksAmygdala 1 year ago
@eneaenea9 no. because an electron is not in the particle form while its circling.
the graph was just a 2d representation. you cant visualize an electron as a particle / planet though, as i will explain in part 18
also photons do not travel through space as a particle, and they are not physically moving in a wave.
Nassim is wrong on that aspect. Photons don't travel like a spiral.
seattle4truth 1 year ago
Also, I was going to mention this to them and see what they think... but, and I am sure I am not along in this feeling, I felt that they would just laugh and dismiss it... it is like going to talk to anyone about conspiracy theories... they just stair at you with a glare of pity in their eyes... For some reason I feel like michio kaku would listen.
ChaeoS117 1 year ago
This one felt like a good ending to the series, especially due to the "call to arms" to the audience to help develop the theory... I was in Fourier class a few days ago and some physics majors were talking about maxwells equations and apparently that is some very very difficult stuff... so I am worried about digging into the math and finding that I have to learn EM-theory :*( ....
ChaeoS117 1 year ago
@ChaeoS117 Ending??? We are far from done mon frere. :D
And BTW... if you want to mention it to them... Come to them straight with the math. And say that you can show how planck's constant is irrelevant. That is what will impress them, if anything.
seattle4truth 1 year ago 5
If the ground state area of energetic discontinuity around the nucleus were to suddenly disappear, what would happen next?
RockStarholic 1 year ago
Well, I think that this area of energetic disconnect might be caused by a property of space time it self..I've been working on an Idea that can define the properties of spatial permeability that might be able to explain this. :)
gsusreloded 1 year ago 2
i lov the freemason checkboard on the kids add..... lol
baboonsquadron 1 year ago
@baboonsquadron 07:24
baboonsquadron 1 year ago
Thanks for the thought recognition ; )
Snowflake70 1 year ago
@Snowflake70 yeah man thanks for bring up the clutch thing... its a great analogy
seattle4truth 1 year ago
Elementary!
baalisgod666 1 year ago
welkom back
marsL001 1 year ago