I don't think SC2 will be good enough to be a competition to Red Alert 3... Anyway, I'm sure we can see a lot of "familiar" things in SC2 from other sci-fis.
"We are the Bor... Zer... Blizzard. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile."
haha, what are yo saying? starcraft is not only a game, is a truly epic history, very reallistic. People is tired about stories like Rusians against North americans, evil ones against good ones.
starcraft 2 will be much grater than red alert 3 now that it will be a trilogy, and this dirty publicity is a prove of it, and the marks as spam are prove of desesperation haha lol
I accept your OPINION, but an argument about which game is better is unnecessary, because OPINIONs are different. (Please, don't mention how much StarCraft copies have been sold arround the world, because it's totally irrelevant in this topic, statistics can't change a game). I THINK SC is good, but not as epic or legendary as many people believe. However, the FACT is that Blizzard use many ideas of WH40K or Star Trek to create this game. It's not bad at all, but don't call it a legend. IMHO
I was not the one who compared the games, it was you, and if you think how many copies a game sells is irrelevant to say if a game is good. What dou you consider relevant?
Also saying that red alert 3 is better than SC2 because the took things from WH40K is a bad argument. It says nothing
Sucky says in other clip (sucky... haha) "another expansion pack" referingo to another blizzard's game WotLK.
So if EA is sure they are making good games why do they need this kind of publicity?
I've never said RA3 is better than SC2 because that took things from WH40K (BTW I was talking about SC1). Yes, I think RA3 will be better than SC or SC2 FOR ME (my own opinion), because I like its gameplay, atmosphere, etc. The fact that Blizzard copied ideas is not important in this matter.
"What dou you consider relevant?" - pretty simple: my own, personal, subjective experience, opinion. E.g. I don't care how many copies of RA2 was sold in 2000, I like it, because I find it good.That's all
So, okay, but again, a personal feeling is not relevan. I can say mario bross or troll is better than red alert 3 or starcraft or gears of war in a personal point of view, but all know thats not true however is valid for me.
So you'd better say "I like red alert 3 more" than saying "red alert 3 is better"
"I THINK RA3 will be better than SC or SC2 FOR ME (MY OWN OPINION)"
I've been saying the same on other words. I know this is only my own opinion (Ok, not only mine, but you understand), and it is not an unquestionable truth, just a simple opinion out of many.
Better or not... who knows. "God is dead" as Nietzsche has said, so there is no absolute truth. It doesn't even matter. Maybe we were just wasting our time.
ironic, seeing as how her japanese name means 'like'.
tristeonz 3 years ago
I don't think SC2 will be good enough to be a competition to Red Alert 3... Anyway, I'm sure we can see a lot of "familiar" things in SC2 from other sci-fis.
"We are the Bor... Zer... Blizzard. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile."
GO RED ALERT!!!
AtrHkOrd2 3 years ago
haha, what are yo saying? starcraft is not only a game, is a truly epic history, very reallistic. People is tired about stories like Rusians against North americans, evil ones against good ones.
starcraft 2 will be much grater than red alert 3 now that it will be a trilogy, and this dirty publicity is a prove of it, and the marks as spam are prove of desesperation haha lol
savagemessiah82 3 years ago
I accept your OPINION, but an argument about which game is better is unnecessary, because OPINIONs are different. (Please, don't mention how much StarCraft copies have been sold arround the world, because it's totally irrelevant in this topic, statistics can't change a game). I THINK SC is good, but not as epic or legendary as many people believe. However, the FACT is that Blizzard use many ideas of WH40K or Star Trek to create this game. It's not bad at all, but don't call it a legend. IMHO
AtrHkOrd2 3 years ago
I was not the one who compared the games, it was you, and if you think how many copies a game sells is irrelevant to say if a game is good. What dou you consider relevant?
Also saying that red alert 3 is better than SC2 because the took things from WH40K is a bad argument. It says nothing
Sucky says in other clip (sucky... haha) "another expansion pack" referingo to another blizzard's game WotLK.
So if EA is sure they are making good games why do they need this kind of publicity?
savagemessiah82 3 years ago
I've never said RA3 is better than SC2 because that took things from WH40K (BTW I was talking about SC1). Yes, I think RA3 will be better than SC or SC2 FOR ME (my own opinion), because I like its gameplay, atmosphere, etc. The fact that Blizzard copied ideas is not important in this matter.
"What dou you consider relevant?" - pretty simple: my own, personal, subjective experience, opinion. E.g. I don't care how many copies of RA2 was sold in 2000, I like it, because I find it good.That's all
AtrHkOrd2 3 years ago
So, okay, but again, a personal feeling is not relevan. I can say mario bross or troll is better than red alert 3 or starcraft or gears of war in a personal point of view, but all know thats not true however is valid for me.
So you'd better say "I like red alert 3 more" than saying "red alert 3 is better"
savagemessiah82 3 years ago
"I don't THINK SC2 will be good enough..."
"I THINK RA3 will be better than SC or SC2 FOR ME (MY OWN OPINION)"
I've been saying the same on other words. I know this is only my own opinion (Ok, not only mine, but you understand), and it is not an unquestionable truth, just a simple opinion out of many.
Better or not... who knows. "God is dead" as Nietzsche has said, so there is no absolute truth. It doesn't even matter. Maybe we were just wasting our time.
AtrHkOrd2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You know what really suck? RED ALERT 3 I played the beta man did it suck hard....sigh so disappointing...so very disappointing
sofa12367 3 years ago
Lol
SC2 reference?
aptspire 3 years ago
Yes, starcraft 2 reference, the enemy to beat.
savagemessiah82 3 years ago
SHE SAID CRAPTASTIC
zoticfps 3 years ago 2
...at least she's cute?
ChaosxEnvy 3 years ago
yes she is, but not as cute as lissette ;)
Eqvaliser 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
EA GAMES - FUCK UP EVERYTHING
Killerratte 3 years ago
i like EA game but yeah they have fucking shit AI like BF and Merc 2 o my fucking days they are sooo fucking stupid it piss me off
NoMONKEYS 3 years ago
An indirect swipe @ SC2
RedFenril 3 years ago
Dah.... but it was directed at Star Trek XI.
Corporate Wars lolol.... But I'd still watch Star Trek XI... just for the JJ Abrams.
charliec81 3 years ago 4
na, sar trek is a movie, starcraft is direct competition to starcraf 2, and I tinhk SC2 will be better xD
savagemessiah82 3 years ago
starcraft is direct competition to red alert jeje sorry for the mitake
savagemessiah82 3 years ago
Of course it'll be better.... Blizzard is taking more time to produce it !
charliec81 3 years ago
FUCK STAR CRAFT!!!!!!!!!!!
jelloman17 3 years ago 5