@lebrent It is not a foul because there is no referee. If there was a ref it would be all ball fouls...which basically means all cue ball fouls count plus if you touch any object ball its a foul as well. With no referee it is cue ball fouls only...touchin it with the tip, scratch, failure to contact the lowest numbered ball first...etc....
@lebrent It is not a foul because there is no referee. If there was a ref it would be all ball fouls...which basically means all cue ball fouls count plus if you touch any object ball its a foul as well. With no referee it is cue ball fouls only...touchin it with the tip, scratch, failure to contact the lowest numbered ball first...etc....
no one said anything about the foul... what the?
huyiy 2 years ago
blatantly obvious foul how was that not called?
jasonconrad 2 years ago
the world will end now because of that foul. This kind of stuff happens in the tournaments all the time.
pepamethodman 2 years ago
im not even sure there playing all ball foul, stupid rule anyway
pigdisposal 2 years ago
his cue stick hit the 7ball at 39.26. omg that was so obvious! no foul?!
lebrent 2 years ago 7
@lebrent It is not a foul because there is no referee. If there was a ref it would be all ball fouls...which basically means all cue ball fouls count plus if you touch any object ball its a foul as well. With no referee it is cue ball fouls only...touchin it with the tip, scratch, failure to contact the lowest numbered ball first...etc....
plmijnygcrdzwaquyijo 1 year ago
@lebrent It is not a foul because there is no referee. If there was a ref it would be all ball fouls...which basically means all cue ball fouls count plus if you touch any object ball its a foul as well. With no referee it is cue ball fouls only...touchin it with the tip, scratch, failure to contact the lowest numbered ball first...etc....
plmijnygcrdzwaquyijo 1 year ago
i love Francisco Bustamante
lebrent 2 years ago
1ST TO VIEW!
deathinflctor 2 years ago