Added: 2 years ago
From: purplejamifan
Views: 6,280
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • well enjoy it lol :) i'm sticking with jamiroquai - 17 years and 26 million albums speaks for itself. Dynamite was not a disaster! it was number 3 in the album chart ffs!

  • Who hell cares about charts? Lady Gaga is also in the charts, that doesn't make her any good. Anyone with ears could tell that the bands sound has declined. Dynamite had NOT the same quality as EOPE, RTOTSC or TWM. Jay's voice is absolutely horrendous nowadays. They sure ain't the essance of what they were.

  • He sucks without jamiroquai!

  • No it's Jamiroquai who sucks without Stuart.

  • who's more successful? more popular? who's sold more albums? who's just signed a new record deal with columbia? who's getting the big gigs? Who's managed to stay firmly in the sight's of the public and who is the more committed? I'm not saying stu isn't great, he is but he was just so much better when he was with jamiroquai!

  • After Stuart left the band declined, and has continued to do so ever since. There are no original members left that played an integral part of the Jamiroquai-sound except Derrick. It's basically the Jason Kay Experience, they sound like a freakin coverband. Dynamite was a such disaster. I am looking forward to Stuarts upcoming project featuring Toby Smith on keys way more than the next jmq-album.

  • zzzZZZZ old school fan

    Paul turner is a god

    and mattt J. is the best!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more